Health Care Utilization and Economic Burdens of Hemochromatosis in the United States: A Population-Based Claims Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the health care burden of hemochromatosis in the United States, despite its increased morbidity and mortality due to associated advanced liver diseases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the health care utilization and economic burdens of hemochromatosis in the United States using real-world claims data. METHODS: We performed a case-control analysis of adult participants in the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims database from 2010 to 2015. 37,092 hemochromatosis cases were matched 1:1 by demographics and comorbidities to hemochromatosis-free controls with chronic liver disease using propensity scores. Total and service-specific health care parameters were quantified for the 12 months following versus the 12 months before the first date of hemochromatosis diagnosis and over the 12 months following a randomly selected date for controls. Incremental differences in health care burdens between cases and controls were examined using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and McNemar tests for continuous and dichotomous measures, respectively. Adjusted multivariable regression analyses using generalized linear models were used to compare the health care burdens for cases with controls. RESULTS: In comparison with the year before, the 12 months following first hemochromatosis diagnoses had a higher total number of claims per patient (34.37 vs. 29.99; P < 0.0001) and an increase in the per-patient total health care costs ($20,023 vs. $16,905; P < 0.0001). After hemochromatosis diagnosis, health care costs were 2%, 8%, 23%, and 43% higher for inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and pharmaceutical prescriptions, compared respectively with the 12 months before diagnosis. In the 12 months following the index date, hemochromatosis cases incurred $2,732 more in total unadjusted costs compared with controls. Compared with controls, cases had adjusted incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.26 (95% CI = 1.30-1.77) times the total number of claims (IRR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.38-1.43) more outpatient visits and IRR = 1.10 (95% CI = 1.08-1.11) excess pharmaceutical claims. Compared with controls, cases had significantly higher adjusted mean health care costs for inpatient services ($6,484 vs. $7,854), outpatient services ($7,032 vs. $11,005), and pharmaceutical claims ($2,520 vs. $2,822; all P values < 0.05). The annual health care costs among type 2 diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with hemochromatosis were $6,968, $7,424, $2,967, and $43,847, respectively, higher than type 2 diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, and CKD patients without hemochromatosis (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hemochromatosis in the United States is associated with significant health care utilization and economic burdens driven by outpatient visits, pharmaceutical claims, and a high number of comorbidities DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose. An abstract containing some of the results from this study was accepted for the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Meeting; November 9-13, 2018; San Francisco, CA.

Costs associated with hereditary haemochromatosis in Australia: a cost-of-illness study.

Objective The aim of the present study was to assess health sector, other sector and time-related (productivity) costs associated with hereditary haemochromatosis from societal, government and patient perspectives for the Australian setting. Methods A national web-based survey of people with haemochromatosis was conducted between November 2013 and February 2015. Participants completed a health survey and resource use diaries. Costs were calculated using a bottom-up approach and calculated in 2015 Australian dollars. Results Cost data were available for 157 participants. From a societal perspective, the estimated annual cost of haemochromatosis was A$274million. The mean (95% confidence interval) cost for symptomatic patients was almost threefold greater than that of asymptomatic patients (A$10030 (7705-12670) vs A$3701 (2423-5296) respectively). Health sector and productivity-related time loss were the main cost drivers. When extrapolating costs to the Australian population level, asymptomatic haemochromatosis accounted for higher costs than symptomatic haemochromatosis (A$183million vs A$91million), reflecting the low clinical penetrance estimate used. Total costs increased when higher clinical penetrance estimates were used. Conclusion The present cost-of-illness study, the first to be published for haemochromatosis, found that although costs were substantial, they could be decreased by reducing clinical penetrance. Development of cost-effective strategies to increase early diagnosis is likely to result in better health outcomes for patients and lower total costs. What is known about the topic? To date, no cost-of-illness study has been conducted for haemochromatosis. Previous economic work in this area has relied on cost estimates based on expert opinion. What does the paper add? This paper provides the first cost estimates for haemochromatosis for the Australian population. These estimates, calculated using a bottom-up approach, were extrapolated to the population level based on the most robust epidemiological estimates available for the Australian population. What are the implications for practitioners? Population screening programs have been widely suggested as an approach to reduce clinical penetrance; however, the lack of high-quality economic analyses has been cited as a barrier to implementation. The present study provides the most robust cost estimates to date, which may be used to populate economic models. In addition, the present study illustrates that reducing clinical penetrance of haemochromatosis is likely to result in substantial reductions in cost.

Cost-Effectiveness of Different Population Screening Strategies for Hereditary Haemochromatosis in Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Amongst populations of northern European ancestry, HFE-associated haemochromatosis is a common genetic disorder characterised by iron overload. In the absence of treatment, excess iron is stored in parenchymal tissues, causing morbidity and mortality. Population screening programmes may increase early diagnosis and reduce associated disease. No contemporary health economic evaluation has been published for Australia. The objective of this study was to identify cost-effective screening strategies for haemochromatosis in the Australian setting. METHODS: A Markov model using probabilistic decision analysis was developed comparing four adult screening strategies: the status quo (cascade and incidental screening), genotyping with blood and buccal samples and transferrin saturation followed by genotyping (TfS). Target populations were males (30 years) and females (45 years) of northern European ancestry. Cost-effectiveness was estimated from the government perspective over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: All strategies for males were cost-effective compared to the status quo. The incremental costs (standard deviation) associated with genotyping (blood) were AUD7 (56), TfS AUD15 (45) and genotyping (buccal) AUD63 (56), producing ICERs of AUD1673, 4103 and 15,233/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, respectively. For females, only the TfS strategy was cost-effective, producing an ICER of AUD10,195/QALY gained. Approximately 3% of C282Y homozygotes were estimated to be identified with the status quo approach, compared with 40% with the proposed screening strategies. CONCLUSION: This model estimated that genotyping and TfS strategies are likely to be more cost-effective screening strategies than the status quo.

A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Health Economic Studies Conducted for Hereditary Haemochromatosis.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary haemochromatosis (HH) is a common genetic condition amongst people of northern European heritage. HH is associated with increased iron absorption leading to parenchymal organ damage and multiple arthropathies. Early diagnosis and treatment prevents complications. Population screening may increase early diagnosis, but no programmes have been introduced internationally: a paucity of health economic data is often cited as a barrier. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of all health economic studies in HH. METHODS: Studies were identified through electronic searching of economic/biomedical databases. Any study on HH with original economic component was included. Study quality was formally assessed. Health economic data were extracted and analysed through narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of papers reported on costs or cost effectiveness of screening programmes. Whilst most concluded screening was cost effective compared with no screening, methodological flaws limit the quality of these findings. Assumptions regarding clinical penetrance, effectiveness of screening, health-state utility values (HSUVs), exclusion of early symptomatology (such as fatigue, lethargy and multiple arthropathies) and quantification of costs associated with HH were identified as key limitations. Treatment studies concluded therapeutic venepuncture was the most cost-effective intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of high-quality health economic studies relating to HH. The development of a comprehensive HH cost-effectiveness model utilising HSUVs is required to determine whether screening is worthwhile.

Erythrocytapheresis compared with whole blood phlebotomy for the treatment of hereditary haemochromatosis.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary haemochromatosis may result in severe organ damage which can be prevented by therapy. We studied the possible advantages and disadvantages of erythrocytapheresis as compared with phlebotomy in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, open-label study, patients with hereditary haemochromatosis were randomised to bi-weekly apheresis or weekly whole blood phlebotomy. Primary end-points were decrease in ferritin levels and transferrin saturation. Secondary endpoints were decrease in haemoglobin levels, discomfort during the therapeutic procedure, costs and technicians' working time. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included. Thirty patients were randomised to apheresis and 32 to whole blood phlebotomy. Initially, ferritin levels declined more rapidly in the apheresis group, and the difference became statistically highly significant at 11 weeks; however, time to normalisation of ferritin level was equal in the two groups. We observed no significant differences in decline of transferrin saturation, haemoglobin levels or discomfort. The mean cumulative technician time consumption until the ferritin level reached 50 µg/L was longer in the apheresis group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The cumulative costs for materials until achievement of the desired ferritin levels were three-fold higher in the apheresis group. CONCLUSION: Treatment of hereditary haemochromatosis with erythrocytapheresis instead of whole blood phlebotomy results in a more rapid initial decline in ferritin levels and a reduced number of procedures per patient, but not in earlier achievement of target ferritin level. The frequency of discomfort was equally low with the two methods. The costs and, probably, technician time consumption were higher in the apheresis group.

[Hereditary hemochromatosis HFE: regulatory and economic aspects of diagnosis and medical management]. / Hémochromatose génétique HFE : aspects réglementaires et économiques du diagnostic et de la prise en charge.

HFE hereditary hemochromatosis is a chronic illness (ALD n(o) 17 - Maladies métaboliques et héréditaires) which is the first genetic disease in France (60% of all genetic diseases). The list of medical acts and the services supported by the French national health insurance fund are fully codified by the French national authority for health (HAS) in order to reduce unnecessary health care spending. The search for the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene to confirm the diagnosis is supported by French national health insurance fund since 2007 (under certain conditions). Treatment by phlebotomy is well established. It should begin in hospital and is generally well tolerated. Since April 2009, the use of the patient's blood (phlebotomy - blood donations) in French blood centers provides an additional contribution to blood transfusion. However, if this genetic disease is well known to the scientific viewpoint (mechanism and toxicity of iron overload, gene…) and therapeutically (bleeding), the diagnosis is always made too late by ignorance of the symptoms.

[Using value of information analysis in decision making about applied research. The case of genetic screening for hemochromatosis in Germany]. / Die Nutzung von Informationswertanalysen in Entscheidungen über angewandte Forschung. Der Fall des genetischen Screenings auf Hämochromatose in Deutschland.

Public decision makers face demands to invest in applied research in order to accelerate the adoption of new genetic tests. However, such an investment is profitable only if the results gained from further investigations have a significant impact on health care practice. An upper limit for the value of additional information aimed at improving the basis for reimbursement decisions is given by the expected value of perfect information (EVPI). This study illustrates the significance of the concept of EVPI on the basis of a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model of screening for hereditary hemochromatosis among German men. In the present example, population-based screening can barely be recommended at threshold values of 50,000 or 100,000 Euro per life year gained and also the value of additional research which might cause this decision to be overturned is small: At the mentioned threshold values, the EVPI in the German public health care system was ca. 500,000 and 2,200,000 Euro, respectively. An analysis of EVPI by individual parameters or groups of parameters shows that additional research about adherence to preventive phlebotomy could potentially provide the highest benefit. The potential value of further research also depends on methodological assumptions regarding the decision maker's time horizon as well as on scenarios with an impact on the number of affected patients and the cost-effectiveness of screening.

Therapeutic phlebotomy procedures and their impact on a rural hospital's red blood cell inventory and fiscal stature.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic phlebotomy (TP) programs offer an important community service and often provide financial and donor unit resources for the hospital. This study assessed the financial impact and red blood cell (RBC) inventory contribution of a small, rural hospital-based TP program. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: TP procedures over 13 months were evaluated at a 142-bed rural hospital. The hospital had a Food and Drug Administration variance for a hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) donor program. The revenue for the non-HH therapeutic phlebotomies and the savings attained for units added to RBC inventory from allogeneic eligible HH donors were compiled. RESULTS: During the study, 84 patients were involved in the TP program. Of the 62 HH patients, 43 met eligibility requirements for allogeneic donations resulting in 207 donor units collected for the blood bank inventory and a savings of $21,000 in blood costs. Additionally, 22 non-HH patients underwent 183 TP procedures earning the hospital over $15,000 in net revenue. CONCLUSION: The TP program at this small, rural 142-bed hospital provided a financial gain of $36,000 during the 13-month study period. The HH donor program contributed approximately 4% to the RBC inventory. The TP program at this small, rural 142-bed hospital proved to be financially lucrative and provided a community service to patients.

The cost-effectiveness of screening for hereditary hemochromatosis in Germany: a remodeling study.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic tests for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) are currently included in the German ambulatory care reimbursement scheme but only for symptomatic individuals and the offspring of HH patients. This study synthesizes the most current evidence to examine whether screening in the broader population is cost-effective and to identify the best choice of initial and follow-up screening tests. METHODS: A probabilistic decision-analytic model was constructed to calculate cost per life year gained (LYG) for HH screening among male Caucasians aged 30. Three strategies were considered in both the general population and male offspring of HH patients: phenotypic (transferrin saturation, TS), genotypic (C282Y mutation), and sequential (genotype if TS is elevated) screening. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness of sequential screening among male offspring, sequential population-wide screening, and genotypic screening is 41000, 124000, and 161000 Eero/LYG, respectively. All other strategies were subject to simple or extended dominance. The results are subject to high uncertainty. The most influential parameters in the deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis are discounting of life years gained and the adherence of patients to preventive phlebotomy. DISCUSSION: The current German policy of only screening at-risk individuals is consistent with health economic decision making based on typically accepted thresholds. However, conducting the DNA test after the first elevated TS result is more cost-effective than waiting for a second TS result as recommended by the German guidelines. Further empirical work regarding adherence to long-term prevention recommendations and explicit and well-justified guidance for the choice of discount rates in German economic evaluation are needed.

Genetic screening for iron overload: No evidence of discrimination at 1 year.

PURPOSE: This study measured the extent of insurance and employment problems associated with population screening for hereditary hemochromatosis and iron overload. METHODS: 101,168 primary care patients from the US and Canada were screened for iron phenotypes and HFE genotypes associated with hemochromatosis. Those identified to be at risk (2253) were offered a clinical examination, which 1677 (74%) accepted, and the 1154 of these who responded to an initial questionnaire about psychosocial issues were surveyed 1 year later about whether they had experienced problems with insurance or employment that they attributed to hereditary hemochromatosis and iron overload. RESULTS: 832 (72.1%) of the 1154 participants surveyed after 1 year responded to the second survey. Three (0.4%) had verified problems with insurance or employment that they believed were related to hereditary hemochromatosis and iron overload. Two had problems with life insurance, and one with long-term care insurance. All 3 had elevated iron levels but not a relevant HFE genotype. One of the life insurance problems was resolved; the second one was not serious. The participant who was denied long-term care insurance had other health conditions unrelated to hereditary hemochromatosis and iron overload that could have contributed to the denial. No problems were verified for health insurance or employment, or from any of the comparison group participants (controls and those with inconclusive screening results). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of insurance or employment problems 1 year after phenotype and genotype screening for hereditary hemochromatosis and iron overload is very low.

[Screening for hereditary HFE hemochromatosis]. / Dépistage de l'hémochromatose génétique HFE.

Screening for hereditary HFE hemochromatosis in the general population, by either phenotype or genotype, is not currently recommended by the French High Health Authority. Targeted screening for hereditary HFE hemochromatosis in groups with specific diseases (people with asthenia, arthropathic disorders, liver or heart disease, etc.) has not been shown to be effective. Family screening in first-degree relatives of any proband homozygous for C282Y is strongly advised. This should involve both phenotypic screening, that is, testing for serum iron markers and, if possible, a genotype study of siblings and adult children, conducted according to the rules for genetic counseling and testing. This type of screening is cost-effective. One obstacle today is that the national health insurance fund does not reimburse the HFE test.

Impact of the introduction of a guideline on the targeted detection of hereditary haemochromatosis.

BACKGROUND: In 1998 a clinical guideline for the targeted, accurate and early detection and treatment of HFE-related hereditary haemochromatosis (HH), which comprises a test for the causative HFE-gene mutations, was introduced in our outpatient department. METHODS: The impact of this guideline was evaluated retrospectively. Data were acquired from medical records of patients with discharge diagnosis codes suggestive of HH (n=878 patients), obtained from a period before (n=422) and after guideline introduction (n=456). RESULTS: Combined measurements of serum transferrin saturation and serum ferritin rose from 12.2% (n=53) to 29.5% (n=138, p<0.001), leaving 70% of the patients eligible for HH not tested for iron parameters. The HFE-gene mutation detection test was correctly used in II (40.7%) of 27 tested patients and improperly interpreted in six (22.2%) of these 27 patients. Five new HH patients were diagnosed before and 13 after introduction. Seven of these 13 patients appeared to be incorrectly diagnosed, due to misinterpretation of laboratory results. Diagnostic costs of case detection for each accurately diagnosed patient were euro 2380 before and euro 2600 after introduction of the guideline. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the introduction of a practical guideline for targeted HH detection reveals a low compliance with the guideline, resulting in both a small percentage of patients tested for HH and overdiagnosis of HH. Therefore, the introduction of the guideline should be combined with a more appropriate implementation strategy which includes education on its most critical points, i.e. the indication and interpretation of the iron parameters and the HFE genotype.

Genotype-based screening for hereditary haemochromatosis. I: Technical performance, costs and clinical relevance of a German pilot study.

In 2001, we initiated a pilot study on DNA-based screening of hereditary haemochromatosis (HH) in Germany. A total of 5882 insurants of the German sickness fund Kaufmannische Krankenkasse-KKH requested information on this project, and 3961 of these individuals provided blood samples for testing of the HFE mutation C282Y. Of these, 3930 samples were successfully tested with two independent test methods, and the results were communicated to the referring doctors. In all, 67 of the tested individuals were homozygous for C282Y. Partially, this high rate (1.7%) can be explained by the fact that 42.6% of the homozygotes already knew their clinical diagnosis HH before sending the blood sample. Iron accumulation with further signs or symptoms of HH was present in eight of 34 newly diagnosed C282Y homozygous individuals. Two major aspects of our study were the analytic validity and the direct laboratory costs of different test methods. Of 7860 tests performed, 7841 (99.6%) gave correct results. The overall error rate was 0.24% (95% CI: 0.15-0.38%). The analytic specificity of the tests methods with respect to the detection of homozygosity for C282Y was 100% (7726 of 7726 nonhomozygous test challenges, 95% CI: 99.95-100%), while the analytic sensitivity was 97% (130 of 134 homozygous test challenges, 95% CI: 92.5-99.2%). The direct costs ranged from 11.20-16.35 \[euro] per test method. We conclude that the test methods for C282Y are robust, highly sensitive and specific, and that a DNA-based HH-screening program can be performed at reasonable laboratory costs.

Insurance, employment, and psychosocial consequences of a diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis in subjects without end organ damage.

OBJECTIVES: Asymptomatic individuals with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) may experience difficulties in obtaining employment or insurance, despite their good health. The extent to which these difficulties occur is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the insurance, employment, and psychosocial consequences of a diagnosis of HH in subjects with no end organ damage. METHODS: In three outpatient clinics specializing in the treatment of HH, we performed a survey of individuals diagnosed with HH who were without end organ damage secondary to iron overload, along with their unaffected siblings. A review of the medical records of subjects with HH was performed. Main outcomes were attaining and keeping employment; health, disability and life insurance; and scores on the SF-36, a quality of life measure, and the SCL-90-R, a measure of psychological well-being. RESULTS: Of 130 eligible subjects with HH, 126 (97%) responded. Of the 55 eligible controls, 46 (84%) responded. Of the 126 subjects with HH, 25 (20%) described 28 incidents of insurance denial or increased premium rates, which they attributed to their diagnosis HH. Of the 28 incidents, 16 (57%) involved life insurance, eight (29%) involved health insurance, and four (14%) involved disability insurance. One subject reported an employment refusal. Five of the 25 subjects (20%) reporting insurance denial or increased premiums had significant comorbid conditions. One of 46 sibling controls (2%) reported an increased rate for life insurance (p = 0.003). No differences were noted in either the SF-36 or the SCL-90-R scores between subjects with HH and unaffected siblings. Overall rates of active health, disability, and life insurance were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance denial and increased premium rates are reported commonly among individuals with HH without end organ damage. However, the overall proportion of those with active insurance, the quality of life, and the psychological well-being of these subjects were similar to those of unaffected siblings.

Benefit of population-based screening for phenotypic hemochromatosis in young men.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is a common genetic disease leading to accumulation of iron in the body, most notably in the liver. More men than women become clinically ill. The prognosis is excellent if phlebotomy treatment is started before liver cirrhosis develops. Screening has been recommended, but the benefit of population-based screening has never been shown in a randomized clinical trial. In this article, we estimate the benefit of screening young men, using a theoretical model. METHODS: A phenotypic screening scenario was modelled using a decision tree. Gain of quality-adjusted life-years was used as a measure of benefit, and estimated using Markov processes. Data on the accuracy of the screening tests, the prevalence of HH and the risk of liver cirrhosis were mainly derived from a cross-sectional study on the prevalence and morbidity of HH in 30509 men. Data on the excess mortality of cirrhosis were taken from relevant literature. Sensitivity analysis was done for important variables. RESULTS: Assuming basal case values for variables, screening a cohort of 1000 men aged 30 years for phenotypic HH would gain about 8 quality-adjusted life-years, compared to awaiting symptomatic disease. Based on actual costs of our cross-sectional study, the screening cost was US$250 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The prevalence of phenotypic HH, the excess mortality of liver cirrhosis, the quality of life in non-cirrhotic HH patients, and the fractions of patients compliant with treatment were the most important variables in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Incorporating screening for phenotypic HH in health survey programmes for young men may be worthwhile.