Hidrolizada con alto contenido de trigliceridos de cadena media en pacientes pediátricos con linfangiectasia intestinal primaria y alergia a la leche de vaca / Hydrolyzed with high content of medium chain triglycerides in pediatric patients with primary intestinal lymphangiectasia and allergy to cow's milk

ANTECEDENTES En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución de Institución de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen, el que expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de la fórmula extensamente hidrolizada con alto contenido de triglicéridos de cadena media en pacientes pediátricos con linfangiectasia intestinal primaria y alergia a la leche de vaca. Así, el Dr. Marco Antonio Morales Acosta, médico especialista en Pediatría del Servicio de Pediatría Especializada del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de la Red Prestacional Rebagliati, siguiendo la Directiva N° 003-IETSI-ESSALUD-2016, envía al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación ­ IETSI la solicitud de uso fuera del petitorio del producto fórmula extensamente hidrolizada alta en triglicéridos de cadena media. ASPECTOS GENERALES La linfangiectasia intestinal primaria (LIP) es una enfermedad poco frecuente caracterizada por una dilatación de los vasos linfáticos de la mucosa o submucosa del intestino delgado. Debido a la estasis y, finalmente, a la rotura de los vasos linfáticos, el líquido linfático, rico en albúmina y otras proteínas, se filtra hacia el tracto gastrointestinal (Brownell and Piccoli 2021). La LIP afecta principalmente a niños y adultos jóvenes, y generalmente se diagnostica antes de los 3 años de edad. El síntoma principal es el edema predominantemente bilateral de miembros inferiores relacionado con la gastroenteropatía perdedora de proteínas. También puede haber fatiga, dolor abdominal, pérdida de peso, incapacidad para aumentar de peso, retraso del crecimiento en los niños, diarrea moderada, deficiencias de vitaminas liposolubles debido a malabsorción, o deficiencia de hierro con anemia moderada (Brownell and Piccoli 2021; Orphanet 2021). La etiología y la prevalencia de la LIP es desconocida. En todo el mundo, se han notificado menos de 500 casos (Orphanet 2021). Su diagnóstico se confirma por la observación endoscópica de los vasos linfáticos intestinales dilatados con la correspondiente histología de las muestras de biopsia intestinal (Orphanet 2021). Y los objetivos del tratamiento incluyen maximizar el estado nutricional y la calidad de vida de los pacientes, mediante la reducción de los síntomas y de las secuelas. El pilar de la terapia dietética es una dieta baja en grasas, alta en proteínas y alta en triglicéridos de cadena media (TCM) (Brownell and Piccoli 2021). METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática utilizando las bases de datos PubMed, Cochrane Library y LILACS. Además, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de bases de datos pertenecientes a grupos que realizan evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC), incluyendo el Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), la Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), el Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), el Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud de Colombia (IETS), la Comissáo Nacional de Incorporacáo de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC), entre otros. Asimismo, se revisó la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA) y páginas web de sociedades especializadas en nutrición en pediatría como la North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), la European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), y la American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). De manera adicional, se hizo una búsqueda en la página web del registro de ensayos clínicos administrado por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de los Estados Unidos (https://clinicaltrials.qov/) e International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) (https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/) para poder identificar ensayos clínicos en curso o cuyos resultados no hayan sido publicados. Las estrategias de búsqueda para identificar la evidencia de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) se encuentran en las Tabla 1, 2 y 3 del Material Suplementario. ANÁLISIS DE LA EVIDENCIA: En la presente evaluación no se identificaron guías, consensos de expertos o estudios que ayudaran a responder la pregunta PICO establecida en este dictamen. En ese sentido la evaluación se centró en la evidencia descrita previamente por el IETSI para el uso de la FEH en niños con APLV y la fórmula con alto contenido de TCM en niños con LIP, la plausibilidad biológica de la eficacia de la intervención de interés, y la opinión de los expertos de EsSalud. CONCLUSIONES: Por todo lo expuesto, el IETSI recomienda el uso de la fórmula extensamente hidrolizada con alto contenido de TCM en pacientes pediátricos con LIP y alergia la leche de vaca. Dado que actualmente el producto farmacéutico fórmula extensamente hidrolizada con alto contenido de triglicéridos de cadena media no cuenta con registro sanitario en el mercado peruano; de requerirse la autorización de este producto farmacéutico se recomienda seguir el procedimiento TUPA 118 "Autorización excepcional para la importación y uso de productos farmacéuticos, dispositivos médicos o productos sanitarios para la prevención y tratamiento individual" en el marco de lo establecido en el artículo 16 de la Ley N° 29459 "Ley de Productos Farmacéuticos, Dispositivos Médicos y Productos Sanitarios".

Detection of serum and salivary IgE and IgG1 immunoglobulins specific for diagnosis of food allergy.

Given the growing incidence and prevalence of life-threatening food allergies, health concerns have raised new perspectives for in vivo and in vitro diagnostic methodologies, pointing to saliva as a promising material, already used to diagnose other pathologies. Based on the above considerations, this study aimed to verify the possible use of saliva for the detection of IgE and IgG1 in the diagnosis of food allergy. This was a randomized, cross-sectional clinical study with a quantitative approach, developed at a hospital referral center in allergy in the state of Ceará, from January to July 2015. The sample consisted of 36 children of both sexes, aged between 1 and 60 months, with a diagnosis of cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) by the RAST test. Children hospitalized or under immunosuppressive drugs were excluded from the study. Serum and saliva samples of the participants were collected and subsequently subjected to the indirect immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) for the detection of specific serum and salivary immunoglobulins for food: corn, papaya, cow's milk, egg white, wheat, soybeans, peanuts, nuts, kiwi, cacao, fish, shrimp, bananas and tomatoes. For comparison of serum and saliva results, the T-test of independent samples and Mann-Whitney were adopted, for samples with normal and non-normal distribution respectively. A confidence interval of 95% was adopted for significant results. It was observed that 100% (n = 36) of the participants presented cow's milk allergy through the indirect ELISA, detecting IgE or IgG1 in serum and saliva. When serum IgE and IgG1 concentrations were compared, there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) in 12 of the 14 foods evaluated. The same amount (n = 12) of non-significant differences (p > 0.05) was observed in the comparison of the 14 foods under IgE and IgG1 contractions in saliva. In the verification of the average values of IgE present in the serum and saliva of the foods, only cow's milk, fish and papaya showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Of the total food evaluated, only the average levels of IgG1 present in serum and saliva showed a significant value (p < 0.05) in banana and tomato. These findings indicate that the detection of IgE and IgG1 in saliva proves to be as efficient as in the serum. The use of the salivary technique for use in the diagnosis of food allergy is suggested.

Cross-over clinical trial for evaluating the safety of camel's milk intake in patients who are allergic to cow's milk protein.

BACKGROUND: Cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) affects between 0.6 and 0.9% of the general population, and its treatment implies the total elimination of the intake of this protein. Camel's milk has been suggested as an alternative for patients over one year of age who suffer from CMPA due to the difference in the amino acid sequence from that of cow's milk. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of camel's milk in children with CMPA. METHODS: Crossed clinical trial for the use of camel's milk vs. amino acid formula, carried out at the Dr. Federico Gómez Children's Hospital of Mexico (HIMFG) on patients between one and 18 years of age with diagnosed CMPA confirmed through double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs). Only those whose allergies were confirmed were randomly placed into two groups: those to be administered camel's milk and those to be administered the amino-acid formula for two weeks, followed by a six-week wash-out period, and then a group crossing for a further two weeks. RESULTS: 49 patients with suspected CMPA were included in the study; the diagnosis was confirmed through DBPCFCs in 15 patients, who were those who participated in the study. After having been administered camel's milk, none of the patients presented adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Camel's milk is safe and tolerable in patients above one year of age with CMPA and can be considered as a good alternative given the benefit of its taste compared to other formulas.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: exaggerations, evidence and clinical practice / Doença do refluxo gastroesofágico: exageros, evidências e a prática clínica

OBJECTIVE: there are many questions and little evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children. The association between GERD and cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA), overuse of abdominal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of GERD, and excessive pharmacological treatment, especially proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some aspects that need clarification. This review aimed to establish the current scientific evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD in children. DATA SOURCE: a search was conducted in the MEDLINE, PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, and Cochrane Library electronic databases, using the following keywords: gastroesophageal reflux; gastroesophageal reflux disease; proton-pump inhibitors; and prokinetics; in different age groups of the pediatric age range; up to May of 2013. DATA SYNTHESIS: abdominal ultrasonography should not be recommended to investigate gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Simultaneous treatment of GERD and CMPA often results in unnecessary use of medication or elimination diet. There is insufficient evidence for the prescription of prokinetics to all patients with GER/GERD. There is little evidence to support acid suppression in the first year of life, to treat nonspecific symptoms suggestive of GERD. Conservative treatment has many benefits and with low cost and no side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: there have been few randomized controlled trials that assessed the management of GERD in children and no examination can be considered the gold standard for GERD diagnosis. For these reasons, there are exaggerations in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease, which need to be corrected. .

OBJETIVO: há muitas dúvidas e poucas evidências para o diagnóstico e tratamento da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE) na criança. A relação entre a DRGE e a alergia às proteínas do leite de vaca (APLV), o uso exagerado da ultrassonografia abdominal para diagnóstico da DRGE e o excesso de medicamentos, especialmente dos inibidores de bomba de prótons (IBP), são alguns aspectos que necessitam esclarecimentos. Esta revisão tem como objetivo estabelecer as evidências científicas atuais para o diagnóstico e tratamento da DRGE em pediatria. FONTES DOS DADOS: foram pesquisadas nas bases de dados eletrônicos do Medline, Pubmed, Lilacs, Cochrane Library e Scielo, nas diferentes faixas etárias da pediatria, até maio de 2013, as seguintes palavras-chave: refluxo gastroesofágico, doença do refluxo gastroesofágico, inibidores da bomba de prótons e procinéticos. SíNTESE DOS DADOS: a ultrassonografia de abdome não deve ser recomendada para pesquisa de refluxo gastroesofágico (RGE). O tratamento simultâneo da DRGE e da APLV induz, muitas vezes, ao uso desnecessário de medicação ou dieta de exclusão. Não existem evidências suficientes para prescrição de procinéticos em todos os portadores de RGE/DRGE. Poucas evidências fornecem suporte para a supressão ácida, no primeiro ano de vida, para tratamento de sintomas inespecíficos, sugestivos de DRGE. O tratamento conservador traz muitos benefícios e poucos gastos, sem efeitos colaterais. CONCLUSÕES: existem poucos estudos controlados e randomizados que avaliam a DRGE na criança e nenhum exame pode considerado padrão-ouro para o seu diagnóstico. Por esses motivos, ocorrem exageros no diagnóstico e no tratamento dessa doença, e que necessitam ...

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: exaggerations, evidence and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: there are many questions and little evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children. The association between GERD and cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA), overuse of abdominal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of GERD, and excessive pharmacological treatment, especially proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some aspects that need clarification. This review aimed to establish the current scientific evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD in children. DATA SOURCE: a search was conducted in the MEDLINE, PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, and Cochrane Library electronic databases, using the following keywords: gastroesophageal reflux; gastroesophageal reflux disease; proton-pump inhibitors; and prokinetics; in different age groups of the pediatric age range; up to May of 2013. DATA SYNTHESIS: abdominal ultrasonography should not be recommended to investigate gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Simultaneous treatment of GERD and CMPA often results in unnecessary use of medication or elimination diet. There is insufficient evidence for the prescription of prokinetics to all patients with GER/GERD. There is little evidence to support acid suppression in the first year of life, to treat nonspecific symptoms suggestive of GERD. Conservative treatment has many benefits and with low cost and no side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: there have been few randomized controlled trials that assessed the management of GERD in children and no examination can be considered the gold standard for GERD diagnosis. For these reasons, there are exaggerations in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease, which need to be corrected.