Renal Autotransplantation for Uncontrolled Hypertension in Nonatherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis-2 Case Reports and a Brief Review of the Literature.

Fibromuscular dysplasia is the most common cause of renovascular hypertension in young adults under 40 years old. It is potentially amenable to renal artery angioplasty, which frequently normalizes blood pressure. However, limited options exist if angioplasty is not technically possible, or restenosis occurs. Here, we describe 2 patients who presented with hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis. In the first case, a young adult with hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis (fibromuscular dysplasia), developed restenosis 11 weeks after an initially successful renal artery angioplasty. In the second case, a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 was diagnosed with hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis. Angioplasty was not possible due to multiple branch occlusions. Both individuals went on to have successful renal autotransplantations, which ultimately cured their hypertension. In this article, we review the background, indications, and blood pressure outcomes in relation to renal autotransplantation in nonatherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

Cardiovascular outcomes improve in children with renovascular hypertension following endovascular and surgical interventions.

BACKGROUND: Renovascular hypertension (RenoVH) is a cause of hypertension in children. A common cause of RenoVH is renal artery stenosis which acts by reducing blood supply to renal parenchyma and activating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, often leading to cardiac remodelling. This longitudinal observational study aims to describe occurrence of cardiovascular changes secondary to RenoVH and also any improvement in cardiac remodelling after successful endovascular and/or surgical intervention. METHODS: All patients with RenoVH referred to our centre, who received ≥ 1 endovascular intervention (some had also undergone surgical interventions) were included. Data were collected by retrospective database review over a 22-year period. We assessed oscillometric blood pressure and eight echocardiographic parameters pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria and had on average two endovascular interventions; of these children, six presented in heart failure. Blood pressure (BP) control was achieved by 54.4% of patients post-intervention. Average z-scores improved in interventricular septal thickness in diastole (IVSD), posterior Wall thickness in diastole (PWD) and fractional shortening (FS); left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and relative wall thickness (RWT) also improved. PWD saw the greatest reduction in mean difference in children with abnormal (z-score reduction 0.25, p < 0.001) and severely abnormal (z-score reduction 0.23, p < 0.001) z-scores between pre- and post-intervention echocardiograms. Almost half (45.9%) had reduction in prescribed antihypertensive medications, and 21.3% could discontinue all antihypertensive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reports improvement in cardiac outcomes after endovascular + / - surgical interventions. This is evidenced by BP control, and echocardiogram changes in which almost half achieved normalisation in systolic BP readings and reduction in the number of children with abnormal echocardiographic parameters. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Stent-Graft Placement for Radiation-Induced Abdominal Aortic Stenosis after Renal Autotransplantation.

Renovascular hypertension (RVH) is a common cause of secondary hypertension. However, there have been no reports on RVH due to radiation-induced abdominal aorta stenosis after renal autotransplantation. A 27-year-old woman with a history of neuroblastoma treated by radiation therapy and RVH treated with renal autotransplantation presented with hypertension and dyspnea. At age 19, she had experienced hypertensive heart failure due to RVH from radiation-induced left renal artery stenosis and had undergone renal autotransplantation involving the extraction of her left kidney. Her systolic blood pressure (BP) was well-controlled but had increased progressively. She was diagnosed with hypertensive heart failure and admitted to hospital. Although her dyspnea soon subsided after treatment, her BP remained high. Renal artery ultrasound revealed no obvious stenosis. The ankle brachial pressure index (ABI) showed a significant bilateral decrease to 0.71/0.71 (right/left) from 0.94/0.95 eight years before. Magnetic resonance angiography and aortic angiography revealed severe stenosis in the abdominal aorta, and the systolic pressure gradient of intra-aortic blood flow, distal and proximal to a stenotic lesion, was 58 mmHg. These arterial stenoses in the irradiated area were highly suggestive of radiation-induced vasculopathy. She finally underwent an endovascular VIABAHN VBX balloon-expandable stent-graft placement for this radiation-induced abdominal aorta stenosis, which resolved the pressure gradient. After the procedure, her ABI improved to 0.91/0.88 and her BP was well-controlled. This is the first case of successful stent-graft placement for RVH after renal autotransplantation due to radiation-induced abdominal aorta stenosis as a consequence of neuroblastoma.

Renal Stem Cells, Renal Resistive Index, and Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin Changes After Revascularization in Patients With Renovascular Hypertension and Ischemic Nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) with or without stenting is the gold standard therapy in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (aRAS). However, therapeutic success depends on the correct timing of revascularization and the reversibility of the renal damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a case series of patients treated with PTRA for renovascular hypertension and ischemic nephropathy. We measured bilateral renal resistive index (RRI), circulating renal stem cells (RSC), and Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) at baseline and after PTRA at different time points to understand their changes in post-revascularization. RESULTS: At baseline, the studied patients (n = 5) had different RSC levels. After PTRAs, all patients showed an improvement in blood pressure, while renal function varied differently within the studied subjects. RRI > 0.75 at baseline and the absence of NGAL decrease after PTRAs were associated with post-PTRA renal function worsening, despite an increase of RSC in all patients. CONCLUSION: Although limited to a few patients, our observation allowed the exploration of the behaviour of the studied parameters in different degrees of renal ischemia. This revealed different disease models suggesting the importance of further investigations in larger and homogeneous cohorts to confirm that a greater basal RSC percentage, low RRI values before PTRA, and a post-revascularization NGAL reduction could be related to better renal outcomes in aRAS patients.

Revascularization for Renovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Renovascular disease is a major causal factor for secondary hypertension and renal ischemic disease. However, several prospective, randomized trials for atherosclerotic disease failed to demonstrate that renal revascularization is more effective than medical therapy for most patients. These results have greatly reduced the generalized diagnostic workup and use of renal revascularization. Most guidelines and review articles emphasize the limited average improvement and fail to identify those clinical populations that do benefit from revascularization. On the basis of the clinical experience of hypertension centers, specialists have continued selective revascularization, albeit without a summary statement by a major, multidisciplinary, national organization that identifies specific populations that may benefit. In this scientific statement for health care professionals and the public-at-large, we review the strengths and weaknesses of randomized trials in revascularization and highlight (1) when referral for consideration of diagnostic workup and therapy may be warranted, (2) the evidence/rationale for these selective scenarios, (3) interventional and surgical techniques for effective revascularization, and (4) areas of research with unmet need.