Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nursing ; 50(2): 24-29, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31904617

RESUMO

Historically, MRI was contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices because the devices' metallic components made this imaging study unsafe. Advances over the last decade have now made MRI safe for many of these patients. This article examines the risks of MRI technology for this patient population and reviews recent guidelines from the Heart Rhythm Society.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Marca-Passo Artificial , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/efeitos adversos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/enfermagem , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos
2.
Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP ; Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP;50(6): 961-964, Nov.-Dec. 2016. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BDENF - Enfermagem | ID: biblio-842688

RESUMO

Abstract OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of radiology nursing intervention in abdominal examination at 3-T MRI. METHOD 60 patients with abdominal diseases were divided into two groups randomly: MR nursing intervention group and control group. All the patients underwent abdominal MR examination at 3-T. The MR nursing interventions were performed in nursing intervention group. The outcomes, including one-time success rate, the ratio of diagnosable MR images and the points of image quality, were compared between these two groups. RESULTS The one-time success rates in control group and MR nursing intervention group were 66.67% and 96.67% with significant difference ( χ2 =9.017, P<0.05). The ratios of diagnosable images in the two groups were 76.67% and 96.67% with significant difference (χ2 =5.192, P<0.05). The points of MR image quality in the two groups were 1.87±0.86 and 2.33±0.55, respectively. There was significant difference between these two groups (t=-2.508, P<0.05). CONCLUSION The effective nursing intervention can make the patients cooperation better in abdominal MR examination and improve the image quality significantly.


Resumen OBJETIVO Se objetivó investigar el efecto de la intervención de enfermería radiológica en examen abdominal de IRM 3-T. MÉTODO Sesenta pacientes con enfermedades abdominales fueron divididos aleatoriamente en dos grupos: grupo intervención de enfermería RM y grupo control. Todos fueron sometidos a examen abdominal de RM 3-T. Las intervenciones de enfermería RM se efectuaron en el grupo establecido. Los resultados, incluyendo tasa de éxito en única vez, relación de imágenes de RM diagnosticables y puntos de calidad de imagen, fueron comparadas entre ambos grupos. RESULTADOS La tasa de éxito en única vez en grupo control y grupo intervención de enfermería RM fueron de 66,67% y 96,67%, expresando diferencias significativas (χ2 =9.017, P<0.05). Los puntos de calidad de imagen de RM en ambos grupos fueron 1,87±0,86 y 2,33±0,55, respectivamente. Existió diferencia significativa entre los grupos (t=-2.508, P<0.05). CONCLUSIÓN La intervención de enfermería efectiva puede mejorar la cooperación de los pacientes en examen abdominal de RM y mejorar significativamente la calidad de imagen.


Resumo OBJETIVO O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar o resultado da intervenção de enfermagem na radiologia em exame de ressonância magnética (RM) abdominal 3 Tesla. MÉTODO 60 pacientes com patologias abdominais foram aleatoriamente divididos em dois grupos: grupo de intervenção de enfermagem em RM e grupo controle. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos ao exame de RM abdominal 3 Tesla. As intervenções de enfermagem em RM foram realizadas no grupo de intervenção de enfermagem. Os resultados foram comparados entre os dois grupos, incluindo a taxa de sucesso único, o coeficiente das imagens de RM diagnosticáveis e os pontos da qualidade de imagem. RESULTADOS As taxas de sucesso único no grupo controle e no grupo de intervenção de enfermagem em RM foram 66,67% e 96,67%, com diferença significativa de (χ2 =9,017, P<0,05). Os coeficientes das imagens diagnosticáveis nos dois grupos foram 76,67% e 96,67%, com diferença significativa de (χ2 =5,192, P<0,05). Os pontos da qualidade de imagem da RM nos dois grupos foram respectivamente 1,87±0,86 e 2,33±0,55. Houve uma diferença significativa entre estes dois grupos (t=-2,508, P<0,05). CONCLUSÃO A intervenção de enfermagem eficaz pode melhorar a cooperação dos pacientes no exame de RM abdominal e melhorar consideravelmente a qualidade da imagem.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/enfermagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Enfermagem Radiológica e de Imagem , Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Projetos Piloto
3.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 50(6): 961-964, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28198961

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of radiology nursing intervention in abdominal examination at 3-T MRI. METHOD: 60 patients with abdominal diseases were divided into two groups randomly: MR nursing intervention group and control group. All the patients underwent abdominal MR examination at 3-T. The MR nursing interventions were performed in nursing intervention group. The outcomes, including one-time success rate, the ratio of diagnosable MR images and the points of image quality, were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: The one-time success rates in control group and MR nursing intervention group were 66.67% and 96.67% with significant difference ( χ2 =9.017, P<0.05). The ratios of diagnosable images in the two groups were 76.67% and 96.67% with significant difference (χ2 =5.192, P<0.05). The points of MR image quality in the two groups were 1.87±0.86 and 2.33±0.55, respectively. There was significant difference between these two groups (t=-2.508, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The effective nursing intervention can make the patients cooperation better in abdominal MR examination and improve the image quality significantly.


Assuntos
Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/enfermagem , Enfermagem Radiológica e de Imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto
4.
Arch Cardiol Mex ; 77 Suppl 4: S4-254-6, 2007.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18938737

RESUMO

The cardiovascular magnetic resonance is a method diagnose noninvasive that does not use radiation obtaining itself a space resolution and temporary that allows to analyze the anatomy and cardiovascular function. The material of used paramagnetic resistance is the gadolinium which causes increase of signal in vascularized weaves and better characterization of the visualized weave, acute east allows to the analysis of the perfusion of the myocardium Subsequent to the coronary syndrome study allows to determine with exactitude the extension of the zone of necrosis, to stratify the risk and of identifying the viable weave as well as of determining the affected territory. This revision must like intention describe the provided interventions of infirmary to the patient with acute coronary syndrome that is put under this type of study since without a doubt our recent incorporation to the Department of Magnetic Resonance has been translated in an integral attention.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/enfermagem , Diagnóstico de Enfermagem , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA