Selective ABO immunoadsorption in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with major ABO incompatibility.

OBJECTIVE: ABO mismatch between donor and recipient occurs in 40% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HCT). Different strategies have been described to reduce isohemagglutinins (IHA) before HCT. We describe the effect of selective ABO immunoadsorption (ABO IA) on erythrocyte transfusion rate and the development of post-transplant pure red cell aplasia (ptPRCA). METHODS: 63 patients with major ABO incompatibility were retrospectively analyzed. Nine patients with major ABO incompatibility and high-IHA titer were treated by ABO IA before HCT. We analyzed the need for transfusion and the occurrence of ptPRCA. We compared the outcome with patients treated by other methods to reduce IHA. RESULTS: In all nine patients treated by ABO IA, IHA decreased in a median four times. PtPRCA occurred in one patient. The median number of transfusions was 8 (range: 0-36) between d0 and d100. In 25 patients with high-IHA titer without treatment or treated by other methods to reduce IHA, the need for transfusions was comparable. No difference in the incidence of ptPRCA was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Selective ABO IA is a feasible, safe, and effective method to reduce IHA before HCT in major ABO incompatibility. No effect on transfusion rate or ptPRCA compared to other strategies could be observed.

Treatment for pure red cell aplasia after major ABO-incompatible allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a multicentre study.

Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) with major ABO incompatibility is responsible for transfusion dependent anaemia, impaired quality of life and iron overload. We conducted a retrospective study, over a 10-year period, which included all consecutive patients who received a major ABO mismatched aHSCT, to assess the impact of specific treatment on PRCA. We did not observe any PRCA in the 57 aHSCT issued from cord blood. Among the remaining 631 patients, cumulative incidence of PRCA was 10·5% [range 8·2-13.0]. The median duration of resolved PRCA was 171 days [IQR 116; 261]. Pre-transplant high isohaemagglutinins titre was associated with an increased risk of PRCA (P < 10-4 ). PRCA did not affect overall survival (P = 0·95). Twenty-two patients (33·3%) received at least one specific treatment. The most commonly used treatments were rituximab (17 patients) and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; seven patients). Regarding PRCA resolution, we did not observe a significant difference between treated or untreated subjects (HR = 0·93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·48- 1·80; P = 0·82). Similar results were observed with erythropoietin treatment (22 patients, HR = 0·86 95% CI: [0·47-1·57] P = 0·62). Our data do not support the use of erythropoietin, rituximab or DLI for the treatment of PRCA.

ABO-Incompatible Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation in a Developing Country: A Multicenter Experience in Malaysia.

Malaysia has a low deceased-donor donation rate and has not embarked on a paired kidney exchange program; therefore, ABO-incompatible and HLA-incompatible transplantation remain the main contributor to the sustainability of the national kidney transplantation (KT) program. There were 26 cases of ABO-incompatible KTs performed from 2011 to 2018 in 3 major transplant centers, namely, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, University Malaya Medical Centre, and Prince Court Medical Centre. We collected perioperative and follow-up data through June 2019. The desensitization protocol varies and is center specific: the localized Japanese protocol and Swedish protocol with a target anti-A/B isoagglutinin titer of 16 or 32 on the day of transplant. The induction and tacrolimus-based maintenance protocol was nearly identical. The median follow-up time was 62.3 months (interquartile range, 37.0-79.7). Fifteen subjects had the highest predesensitization anti-A/B titer of ≥32 (57.7%). The acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection incidence were 12.5% (3 cases) and 8.3% (2 cases), respectively. Patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival rates were 96.2%, 92.3%, and 96.0%, respectively, 1 year post-living-donor KT (LDKT) and 96.2%, 87.2%, and 90.7%, respectively, 5 years post-LDKT. Our experience shows that ABO-incompatible LDKT using a suitable desensitization technique could be a safe and feasible choice for LDKT even with varied desensitization regimens for recipients with relatively high baseline isoagglutinin titers.

Long-term Follow-up of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation in Freiburg, Germany: A Single-Center Outcome Report.

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT) is an established way to enlarge the donor pool around the world. Comparability of long-term success and complications to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABOc-KT) are still under debate. METHODS: We evaluated all patients with a living donor kidney transplantation performed between April 1, 2004, and March 31, 2019. RESULTS: A total of 137 ABOi-KT and 346 ABOc-KT were analyzed. We excluded 4 ABOi-KT recipients and 178 ABOc-KT recipients with cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression or without basiliximab induction. Three patients of the ABOi-KT cohort and 6 patients of the ABOc-KT cohort were lost to follow-up and therefore excluded. The patient characteristics were comparable except for the higher age of transplant recipients in the ABOc-KT cohort and longer follow-up of the ABOi-KT cohort. The mean estimated 15-year recipient survival was 89% in the ABOi-KT cohort and 91% in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .39). Mean estimated graft survival was 71% in the ABOi-KT cohort and 87% in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .68). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) measured in the last follow-up was 51 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the ABOi-KT cohort and 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .36). The incidence for antibody-mediated rejection, T cell-mediated rejections, and infectious complications requiring hospitalization was not different between the cohorts. In the ABOi-KT cohort, we found significantly more lymphoceles and consequent surgical revision procedures. CONCLUSIONS: At our center, ABOi-KT has as good long-term results as ABOc-KT in terms of patient survival, graft survival, and complications, with the exception of increased lymphocele formation.

Acute Rejection and Infectious Complications in ABO- and HLA-Incompatible Kidney Transplantations.

BACKGROUND Patients receiving ABO-incompatible (ABOi) or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible (HLAi) kidney transplantation (KT) require potent immunosuppression and are thus at a higher risk of infectious complications. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of KT stratified by ABO and HLA incompatibilities and identified the factors associated with the clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Recipients who underwent living-related KT between 2012 and 2017 were included and classified into 4 groups: ABO-compatible and HLA-compatible (ABOc/HLAc), HLA-incompatible (ABOc/HLAi), ABO-incompatible (ABOi/HLAc), and ABO-incompatible and HLA-incompatible (ABOi/HLAi). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the risk factors of acute rejection. Out of the 1732 patients who underwent KT, 1190, 131, 358, and 53 were in the ABOc/HLAc, ABOi/HLAc, ABOc/HLAi, and ABOi/HLAi groups, respectively. RESULTS The ABO/HLAi group showed the lowest 5-year graft survival rate (91.7%). Death-censored graft survival was not significantly different among the groups. The mortality rate from infections was significantly higher in the ABOi/HLAi group (7.5%) than the other groups. Antibody-mediated rejection-free graft survival was the lowest in the ABOi/HLAi group, with significant differences compared with the ABOi/HLAc group (P=0.02) and the ABOc/HLAi group (P=0.03). ABOi/HLAi (hazard ratio [HR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-6.65; P<0.01) and combined infection (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.45-2.51; P<0.01) were significant risk factors for acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS Patients with both ABO and HLA incompatibilities showed inferior rates of overall patient and graft survival due to infectious complications. Infection was a prominent risk factor of acute rejection following KT after adjusting for possible confounders including ABO and HLA incompatibility.

Impact of HLA-DPB1 Matching on Outcome of Unrelated Transplant for Hematologic Malignant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Human leukocyte antigen match is the most important donor factor affecting transplant outcome. The HLA-DPB1 mismatch on the clinical outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is less clear. This study is the first meta-analysis to investigate the impact of HLA-DPB1 loci mismatch on clinical outcome after unrelated donor HSCT for hematologic malignant disease. METHODS: We electronically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and a related database (January 1995-December 2018) for all relevant articles. Comparative studies were carried out to investigate the impact of HLA-DPB1 loci mismatch on clinical outcome after unrelated donor HSCT, that is, the disease-free survival, engraftment, graft-vs-host disease, relapse, and transplant-related mortality (TRM). We performed a meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3.5 software and adopted funnel plot regression to assess the publication bias. RESULTS: A total of 1570 articles were retrieved; 21 studies including 27,852 patients were assessed. Pooled comparisons of studies found that the HLA-DPB1-mismatched group had a lower rate of disease-free survival than the DPB1-matched group and lower overall survival in non-T cell-depleted transplant than the DPB1-matched group. The DPB1-mismatched group has higher incidence of acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) and severe (≥ III degree) aGVHD, lower relapse rate, and higher TRM. Moreover, compared with 1-antigen mismatch, 2-antigen mismatch in DPB1 had a higher risk of TRM and a lower relapse rate, and the nonpermissive DPB1 mismatch had significantly higher rate of severe aGvHD and lower rate of disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirmed that HLA-DPB1 has important influence on survival and transplant-related complications during unrelated donor HSCT, and HLA-DPB1 donor selection strategies have been proposed based on personalized algorithm.

Human errors in manual techniques for ABO/D grouping are associated with potentially lethal outcomes.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To review if ABO/D grouping errors are more likely to occur with manual intervention compared to automation. BACKGROUND: Human errors in manual pre-transfusion testing may result in ABO/D-incompatible transfusions and catastrophic outcomes. Accurate ABO/D grouping is a critical part of pre-transfusion testing. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of reports made to Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) between January 2004 and December 2016 where ABO/D grouping errors led to the transfusion of an incorrect blood component to review if errors are more likely to occur with manual intervention compared to automation. RESULTS: In 148 of 158 (93%) ABO/D grouping errors, manual intervention took place. In the remaining 10, causes were not reported. No errors occurred with full automation. Interpretation errors occurred in 86 of 148 (58%) and 42 of 148 (28%) transcription errors, and in 20 of 148, wrong or no samples were selected. Of 148 errors, 21 (14%) resulted in ABO-incompatible transfusion, with one death in 2004 due to an interpretation error in a manual ABO group. In 30 of 148 (20%), D-positive red cells were given to D-negative recipients, where three women of child-bearing potential became sensitised and developed anti-D. ABO grouping errors have reduced from 18 of 539 (3%) of total reports analysed in 2004 (3·3%) to 3 of 3091 (0·10%) in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Where manual testing cannot be avoided, results should be confirmed using automated techniques as soon as possible, and a back-up process should be available 24/7. SHOT data confirm that manual interventions are prone to human error, especially in transcription and interpretation, and demonstrate a continuing need for appropriate serological knowledge and understanding by transfusion laboratory staff to underpin safety provided by automation and information technology (IT).

Red blood cell transfusion burden by day 30 predicts mortality in adults after single-unit cord blood transplantation.

Increased red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements are associated with morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, its impact on the outcomes after cord blood transplantation (CBT) is unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 278 adult patients who received single-unit CBT in our institute. The median number of RBC transfusions for each patient was 12 units (range, 4-66) by day 30 and 14 units (range, 4-70) by RBC engraftment. Sex, cord blood CD34+ cell dose, cytomegalovirus serostatus, total body irradiation dose in the conditioning regimen, ABO blood group incompatibility, and pre-CBT RBC transfusion requirements were significantly associated with the number of RBC transfusion units in the linear regression analysis. In the multivariate analysis, RBC transfusion ≥18 units by day 30 was significantly associated with higher overall mortality (hazard ratio, 1.86; P = 0.018). These data suggested that early RBC transfusion burden was significantly associated with overall mortality in adult patients undergoing single CBT. Early RBC transfusion burden might be a surrogate marker for poor outcomes after single CBT.

A comparison of desensitization methods: Rituximab with/without plasmapheresis in ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Plasmapheresis is a desensitization method used prior to ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation. However, studies on its usefulness in the rituximab era are lacking. METHODS: Fifty-six adult patients underwent ABO-I living donor liver transplantation between January 2012 and October 2015. A single dose of rituximab (300 mg/m2) was administered 2 weeks before surgery with plasmapheresis in all patients until February 2014 (RP group, n = 26). Patients were administered rituximab only, without plasmapheresis between March 2014 and October 2015 (RO group, n = 30). RESULTS: The 6-, 12- and 18-month overall survival rates were 92.3%, 80.8% and 76.9% in the RP group and 96.6%, 85.4% and 85.4% in the RO group, respectively (P = 0.574). When the initial isoagglutinin titers < 16, neither group showed a rebound rise of isoagglutinin titers. For patients with initial isoagglutinin titers ≥ 16, the rebound rise of isoagglutinin titers was more prominent in the RP group. There was no difference in time-dependent changes in B cell subpopulations and ABO-I-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient desensitization for ABO-I living donor liver transplantation can be achieved using rituximab alone. This desensitization strategy does not affect the isoagglutinin titers, ABO-I-related complications and patient survival.

Results of a multicenter prospective clinical study in Japan for evaluating efficacy and safety of desensitization protocol based on rituximab in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Deceased organ donations are rare in Japan, with most kidney transplants performed from a limited number of living donors. Researchers have thus developed highly successful ABO-incompatible transplantation procedures, emphasizing preoperative desensitization and postoperative immunosuppression. A recent open-label, single-arm, multicenter clinical study prospectively examined the efficacy and safety of rituximab/mycophenolate mofetil desensitization in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy. METHODS: Mycophenolate mofetil and low dose steroid were started 28 days pretransplant, followed by two doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2 at day -14 and day -1, and postoperative immunosuppression with tacrolimus or ciclosporin and basiliximab. The primary endpoint was the non-occurrence rate of acute antibody-mediated rejection. Patient survival and graft survival were monitored for 1 year posttransplant. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received rituximab and underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. CD19-positive peripheral B cell count decreased rapidly after the first rituximab infusion and recovered gradually after week 36. The desensitization protocol was tolerable, and most rituximab-related infusion reactions were mild. No anti-A/B antibody-mediated rejection occurred with this series. One patient developed anti-HLA antibody-mediated rejection (Banff 07 type II) on day 2, which was successfully managed. Patient and graft survival were both 100 % after 1 year. CONCLUSION: Our desensitization protocol was confirmed to be clinically effective and with acceptable toxicities for ABO-I-KTx (University Hospital Medical Information Network Registration Number: UMIN000006635).

Immune Desensitization Allows Pediatric Blood Group Incompatible Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Blood group incompatible transplantation (ABOi) in children is rare as pretransplant conditioning remains challenging and concerns persist about the potential increased risk of rejection. METHODS: We describe the results of 11 ABOi pediatric renal transplant recipients in the 2 largest centers in the United Kingdom, sharing the same tailored desensitization protocol. Patients with pretransplant titers of 1 or more in 8 received rituximab 1 month before transplant; tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were started 1 week before surgery. Antibody removal was performed to reduce titers to 1 or less in 8 on the day of the operation. No routine postoperative antibody removal was performed. RESULTS: Death-censored graft survival at last follow-up was 100% in the ABOi and 98% in 50 compatible pediatric transplants. One patient developed grade 2A rejection successfully treated with antithymocyte globulin. Another patient had a titer rise of 2 dilutions treated with 1 immunoadsorption session. There was no histological evidence of rejection in the other 9 patients. One patient developed cytomegalovirus and BK and 2 others EBV and BK viremia. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored desensitization in pediatric blood group incompatible kidney transplantation results in excellent outcomes with graft survival and rejection rates comparable with compatible transplants.

Cascade plasmapheresis as preconditioning regimen for ABO-incompatible renal transplantation: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Removal of anti-ABO is an important component of the preconditioning regimen for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplant. Cascade plasmapheresis (CP) is one of the extracorporeal methods of antibody removal, others being conventional plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption. There is no previous published experience with CP in this context. The purpose of this study was to present an early experience with this approach. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Consecutive ABOi renal transplant recipients in whom CP was used for pre- and posttransplant anti-ABO removal were included. All the patients received intravenous rituximab 2 weeks before transplant. After 1 week, CP was started along with oral tacrolimus and mycophenolate sodium. Alternate-day CP was done to attain immediate pretransplant antibody titer of not more than 8. RESULTS: Fifteen ABOi renal transplant recipients had baseline (pretreatment) antibody titers ranging from 16 to 512. Desensitization rate was 100%. The mean number of procedures before transplant to achieve titer of not more than 8 was 3.27 ± 1.39. Patient survival was 93% and death-censored graft survival was 87%. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was seen in three patients (20%), one (6.67%) being acute antibody mediated rejection. The complication rate during CP was 4% and two patients had bleeding complication after surgery. Posttransplant infection rate was 13%. CONCLUSION: Based on limited number of patients, we conclude that CP is a safe and effective extracorporeal method for pretransplant ABO antibody removal in patients undergoing ABOi transplant. Patients undergoing CP met target preoperative antibody titers and the clinical outcomes were acceptable.

Preconditioning Therapy in ABO-Incompatible Living Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation is now an established form of renal replacement therapy, but the efficacy and safety of the different types of preconditioning therapies are unclear. We aimed to synthesize the totality of the published evidence about the effects of any form of preconditioning therapies in living donor ABOi kidney transplantation on graft and patient outcomes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Clinicaltrial.gov databases (inception through June 2015) to identify all studies that described the outcomes of adult living donor ABOi kidney transplantations using any form of preconditioning therapies. Two independent reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Data were summarized using the random effects model, and heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analyses. We assessed confidence in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. RESULTS: Eighty-three studies (54 case reports and case series, 25 cohort, 2 case-control, and 2 registry studies) involving 4810 ABOi transplant recipients were identified. Overall, confidence in the available evidence was low. During a mean follow-up time of 28 (standard deviation [SD], 26.6) months, the overall graft survival for recipients who received immunoadsorption or apheresis was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 88.2%-97.1%) and 88.0% (95% CI, 82.6%-91.8%), respectively. For those who received rituximab or underwent splenectomy, the overall graft survival was 94.5% (95% CI, 91.6%-96.5%) and 79.7% (95% CI, 72.9%-85.1%), respectively. Data on other longer-term outcomes, including malignancy, were sparse. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab or immunoadsorption appeared to be promising preconditioning strategies before ABOi kidney transplantation. However, the overall quality of evidence and the confidence in the observed treatment effects are low. The increased use of ABOi kidney transplantation needs to be matched with randomized trials of different types, dosing, and frequency of preconditioning therapies so that this scarce resource can be used most effectively and efficiently.

Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Across ABO-Incompatibility.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of adult ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).ABO-incompatible LDLT is an aggressive treatment that crosses the blood-typing barrier for saving lives from liver diseases. Although graft and patient survival have been improved recently by various treatments, the results of adult ABO-incompatible LDLT require further evaluation.Two regimens were designed based on isoagglutinin IgG and IgM titers and the time course of immunological reactions at this institute. When isoagglutinin IgG and IgM titers were ≤64, liver transplantation was directly performed and rituximab (375 mg/m) was administrated on postoperative day 1 (regimen I). When isoagglutinin titers were >64, rituximab (375 mg/m) was administered preoperatively with or without plasmapheresis and boosted on postoperative day 1 (regimen II). Immunosuppression was achieved by administration of mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and steroids.Forty-six adult ABO-incompatible and 340 ABO-compatible LDLTs were performed from 2006 to 2013. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores for ABO-incompatible recipients ranged from 7 to 40, with a median of 14. The graft-to-recipient weight ratio ranged from 0.61% to 1.61% with a median of 0.91%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 81.7%, 75.7%, and 71.0%, respectively, for ABO-incompatible LDLT recipients, compared to 81.0%, 75.2%, and 71.5% for ABO-C recipients (P = 0.912). The biliary complication rate was higher in ABO-incompatible LDLT recipients than in the ABO-compatible recipients (50.0% vs 29.7%, P = 0.009).In the rituximab era, the blood type barrier can be crossed to achieve adult ABO-incompatible LDLT with survival rates comparable to those of ABO-compatible LDLT, but with more biliary complications.

Trends in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

The ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation was developed in Japan in 1989. Currently, most transplant physicians and surgeons have noted that outcomes are unexpectedly excellent, and no hyperacute rejections have been reported since 2001. In the registry of the Japanese ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Committee, the data of 2434 ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplants were collected from 120 Japanese kidney transplant centers. Overall patient and graft survival rates were 97% and 94% at 1 year, 93% and 86% at 5 years, 90% and 71% at 10 years, and 73% and 52% at 20 years. The patient survival and graft rates in 2001 to 2012 were 93% and 81%, which were significantly better than 83% and 55% reported in 1989 to 2000. The addition of novel immunosuppressive treatments has improved results. Azathioprine has been replaced by mycophenolate mofetil since 2000 to 2001, and basiliximab and rituximab were introduced in 2002 and 2004. The titer of antidonor blood group antibody before transplantation was not correlated with graft survival in 2001 to 2012. De novo antibodies against vascular endothelium of peritubular and glomerular capillaries seemed to be more important than natural antibodies against red blood cells. Therefore, recipients with antidonor blood group antibody titers < 1:128 did not require antibody-removal procedures such as plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption. In particular, children (regard less of their peritoneal dialysis status) do not need to be catheterized for plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption. It is better to avoid the risks of catheterization and antibody removal procedures in children with end-stage renal failure.

ABO-incompatible living-donor pediatric kidney transplantation in Japan.

The Japanese ABO-Incompatible Transplantation Committee officially collected and analyzed data on pediatric ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation in July 2012. The age of a child was defined as <16 years, and 89 children who had undergone ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation from 1989 to 2011 were entered in a registry. These data were presented as the Japanese registry of pediatric ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation at the regional meetings of the International Pediatric Transplantation Association (IPTA) in Nagoya in September 2012 and in Sao Paulo in November 2012.

Section 15. A desensitizing protocol without local graft infusion therapy and splenectomy is a safe and effective method in ABO-incompatible adult LDLT.

BACKGROUND: The use of rituximab (Rit) to prevent antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) adult living donor liver transplants (ALDLTs) has raised questions about the role of local graft infusion therapy (LGIT) and splenectomy (SPN); however, they are still regarded as essential components of the desensitization (DSZ) protocol. METHODS: The DSZ protocol consisted of plasma exchange and Rit. None of the patients underwent SPN. The patients were divided into two groups. The patients in Group I (n=20) received LGIT via the hepatic artery or portal vein. The patients in Group II (n=100) did not receive LGIT. RESULTS: One hundred twenty ABOi ALDLTs were performed from November 2008 to June 2012, and there was only one case of operative mortality (0.8%). There was no significant difference in the 3-year patient survival rates between patients receiving ABO-compatible and ABOi ALDLT (88.8% vs. 94.8%; P=0.11). LGIT catheter-related complications occurred in six patients (30.0%). There was no statistically significant difference in the 3-year patient survival rates between the groups (90.0% vs. 95.0%; P=0.26). One patient in Group 1 (0.8%) experienced AMR. Diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture occurred in two patients (10.0%) in Group I and in five patients (5.0%) in Group II, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.11). The incidence of biliary stricture was similar in both groups (P=0.06), but the incidence of infection was significantly higher in Group I (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: The DSZ protocol without LGIT and splenectomy is a safe and effective method of attaining a successful outcome of ABOi ALDLT.

A questionnaire on survival of kittens depending on the blood groups of the parents.

Cats more than 2 months of age have alloantibodies against the blood type antigen that they do not possess. Maternal antibodies, including alloantibodies against blood groups, are transferred to the kittens' systemic circulation when they suckle colostrum during the first 12-16 h after birth. If kittens with blood group A or AB nurse from a mother with blood group B they may develop neonatal isoerythrolysis (NI). Breeders can prevent kittens at risk of NI from nursing during the first 16-24 h; after this period it is safe to let them nurse. Kittens depend, however, on the passive transfer of antibodies from the colostrum for early protection against infections. Although it is known that kittens deprived of colostrum will also be deprived of passive systemic immunity, it is not known if this will affect their health. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate kitten mortality in litters with B-mothers and A-fathers compared to litters with A-mothers. In addition, the aim was to evaluate the effects of colostrum deprivation on the health of the mothers, and the breeders' opinions and experiences of these combinations of breedings. A web-based questionnaire was constructed and distributed to breeders. The results indicate that there is no difference in mortality between planned litters that have mothers with blood group A and litters with mothers that have blood group B and fathers that have blood group A. When managing blood group incompatibility in cat all factors affecting the health of the cats, including genetic variation, should be considered.

ABO-incompatible living-donor pediatric kidney transplantation in Japan

The Japanese ABO-Incompatible Transplantation Committee officially collected and analyzed data on pediatric ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation in July 2012. The age of a child was defined as <16 years, and 89 children who had undergone ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation from 1989 to 2011 were entered in a registry. These data were presented as the Japanese registry of pediatric ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation at the regional meetings of the International Pediatric Transplantation Association (IPTA) in Nagoya in September 2012 and in Sao Paulo in November 2012.

Impact of the baseline anti-A/B antibody titer on the clinical outcome in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We investigated the impact of the baseline anti-A/B antibody titer on the clinical outcome in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (IKT). METHODS: We included 183 patients who had undergone KT (40 ABO IKT and 143 ABO-compatible KT). Eight patients with a baseline titer of ≥1:512 were assigned to the high-titer group and 32 patients with a baseline titer of ≤1:256 were assigned to the low-titer group. Patients who underwent ABO-compatible KT were used as the control group. We compared the clinical outcomes of the three groups. RESULTS: Before transplantation, the high-titer group displayed more frequent antibody rebound, as shown in a lower titer reduction rate, and more difficulty reaching the target titer (1:16) than the low-titer group. During the postoperative period and out-clinic follow-up, antibody rebound was more frequent, and the rate of acute rejection and infection were significantly higher and allograft function was lower in the high-titer group than in the low-titer and control groups. Multivariate analysis showed that high baseline antibody titer was an independent risk factor for acute rejection. CONCLUSION: ABO IKT in the high-titer group (baseline titer ≥1:512) required greater caution compared to the low-titer group because of the higher tendency of antibody rebound and the risk for acute rejection.