Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is defined by the International Urogynecology Association (IUGA) and International Continence Society as the complaint of involuntary leakage of urine associated with urgency and also with exertion, effort, sneezing or coughing. It therefore implies the coexistence of both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). MUI is a heterogeneous diagnosis that requires an assessment of its individual components of SUI and UUI. Management requires an individualised approach to the symptom components. The aim of this review is to identify the assessment/investigations and management options for MUI. METHODS: A working subcommittee from the IUGA Research & Development (R&D) Committee was created and volunteers invited from the IUGA membership. A literature review was performed to provide guidance focused on the recommended assessment and management of MUI. The document was then evaluated by the entire IUGA R&D Committee and IUGA Board of Directors and revisions made. The final document represents the IUGA R&D Committee Opinion. RESULTS: The R&D Committee MUI opinion paper provides guidance on the assessment and management of women with MUI and summarises the evidence-based recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed urinary incontinence is a complex problem and successful management requires alleviation of both the stress and urge components. Care should be individualised based on patient preferences. Further research is needed to guide patients in setting goals and to determine which component of MUI to treat first. The evidence for many of the surgical/procedural treatment options for MUI are limited and needs to be explored in more detail.

Bladder neck incompetence could be an etiology of overactive bladder syndrome in women with stress urinary incontinence after anti-incontinence surgery: insights from transrectal sonography.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of bladder neck incompetence (BNI) and the anatomic differences between different types of urinary incontinence (UI) and overactive bladder (OAB) by transrectal sonography, and to investigate these differences among those with stress UI (SUI) or mixed UI (MUI) who exhibited de novo or persistent OAB symptoms following anti-incontinence surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 184 patients with SUI, MUI, urge UI (UUI), or OAB dry who underwent transrectal ultrasound between 2017 and 2022. The presence of BNI and urethral incompetence assessed by transrectal ultrasound were recorded in all included patients, and recorded preoperatively and postoperatively among patients with SUI and MUI who underwent anti-incontinence surgery. RESULTS: Among the patients, 91%, 84%, 76%, and 71% exhibited BNI in MUI, SUI, UUI, OAB dry group, respectively. Significantly higher rate of patients with BNI were found in MUI than in OAB dry group. Patients with OAB symptoms after anti-incontinence surgery exhibited significantly higher rates of BNI and urethral incompetence than those who did not have postoperative OAB symptoms. Among MUI patients with preoperative BNI, significantly lower rate of postoperative BNI and urethral incompetence was observed in individuals who had improved OAB symptoms after surgery, compared to those without improvement. CONCLUSION: A higher BNI rate was observed in the MUI group. A significantly higher BNI rate was observed in women with OAB symptoms after anti-incontinence surgery. Patients with MUI had improved OAB symptoms if BNI was successfully corrected after anti-incontinence surgery.

Longitudinal urgency outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a well-known adverse outcome following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Although postoperative SUI has been extensively studied, little focus has been placed on understanding the natural history and impact of urgency symptoms following RALP. The UVA prostatectomy functional outcomes program (PFOP) was developed to comprehensively assess and optimize continence outcomes following RALP. The present study focuses on assessing urgency outcomes in this cohort. METHODS: PFOP patients with a minimum of 6-months follow up following RALP were included. The PFOP includes prospectively assessed incontinence and quality of life outcomes utilizing ICIQ-MLUTS, Urgency Perception Score (UPS), and IIQ-7 questionnaires. The primary study outcome was urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) as determined by ICIQ-MLUTS UUI domain. Secondary outcomes included urgency (UPS score) and quality of life (IIQ-7). RESULTS: Forty patients were included with median age 63.5 years. Fourteen (35%) patients reported UUI at baseline. UUI and QOL scores worsened compared to baseline at all time-points. Urgency worsened at 3-weeks and 3-months but returned to baseline by 6-months. Notably, 63% of patients without baseline UUI reported de-novo UUI at 6 months. Although QOL was lower in patients with versus without UUI (IIQ-7 score 3.0 vs 0.0, p = 0.009), severity of UUI was not associated with QOL when controlling for SUI severity. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate significantly worsened UUI from baseline and a large incidence of de-novo UUI following RALP. Further study is needed to inform how urgency and UUI and its treatment affect health-related quality of life following RALP.

Total fluid intake, caffeine, and other bladder irritant avoidance among adults having urinary urgency with and without urgency incontinence: The Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN).

INTRODUCTION: Caffeine has long been vilified as a cause for urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) along with other potential bladder irritants such as carbonation, alcohol, and acidic juices. The objective of this study was to assess the fluid intake behavior of people with urgency, UUI, and those with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) without UUI or urgency to assess if they avoided certain potential bladder irritants or had different fluid intake. We hypothesized that patients with UUI would avoid caffeine as a self-management method more so than these other two groups. METHODS: Treatment-seeking men and women with LUTS in the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN) Observational Cohort study completed a baseline 3-day voiding and intake diary. "Complete" diaries had 3 days of data and no missing intake or voided volumes. Beverages with any caffeine, alcohol, carbonation, or acidic juice were identified and the total volume was recorded as well as the type of beverage containing caffeine to calculate the daily caffeine dose. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-one participants (277 men and 214 women) with a median age of 63 had complete diaries. Urinary urgency was more prevalent in women than men (79% vs. 55%, p < 0.0001) as was UUI (84% vs. 47%, p < 0.0001). Total fluid intake over 3 days was lower among the urgency group versus the nonurgency group (median [interquartile range] 5.2 [4.0-6.8] L vs. 5.7 [4.3-7.0] L, p = 0.028) and the UUI group compared to the urgency without incontinence group were less likely to consume alcohol (26% vs. 37%, p = 0.04). After adjusting for sex, BMI, age, and total intake volume, UUI participants had 54% lower odds of consuming any caffeine (odds ratio = 0.46, 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.96, p = 0.04) than those without incontinence, but among those that did consume caffeine, no difference in the volume of caffeinated beverages or milligrams of caffeine consumed was detected between those with UUI and those with urgency without incontinence. No difference in carbonation or acidic juice intake was detected between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with urgency consume a lower volume of fluid than those without urgency. UUI participants more often abstain from caffeine, but among those that consume caffeine, the dose is similar to those without UUI. One explanation for these results is that only a subset of individuals with urgency or UUI are caffeine sensitive.

Phenotyping of Urinary Urgency Patients Without Urgency Incontinence, and Their Comparison to Urgency Incontinence Patients: Findings From the LURN Study.

PURPOSE: We characterize patients with urinary urgency with vs without urgency urinary incontinence who presented to clinics actively seeking treatment for their symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants who enrolled in the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network were categorized into urinary urgency with vs without urgency urinary incontinence. Participants were followed for 1 year; their urinary symptoms, urological pain, psychosocial factors, bowel function, sleep disturbance, physical activity levels, physical function, and quality of life were compared. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to examine the relationships between urgency urinary incontinence and these factors. RESULTS: Among 683 participants with urinary urgency at baseline, two-thirds (n=453) also had urgency urinary incontinence; one-third (n=230) had urinary urgency-only without urgency urinary incontinence. No differences were detected in urological pain between urinary urgency-only and urgency urinary incontinence. Those with urgency urinary incontinence had more severe urgency and frequency symptoms, higher depression, anxiety, perceived stress scores, more severe bowel dysfunction and sleep disturbance, lower physical activity levels, lower physical function, and worse quality of life than those with urinary urgency-only. Among those with urinary urgency-only at baseline, 40% continued to have urinary urgency-only, 15% progressed to urgency urinary incontinence, and 45% had no urgency at 12 months. Fifty-eight percent with urgency urinary incontinence at baseline continued to report urgency urinary incontinence at 12 months, while 15% improved to urinary urgency-only, and 27% had no urgency. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with urgency urinary incontinence have severe storage symptoms, more psychosocial symptoms, poorer physical functioning, and worse quality of life. Our data suggested urgency urinary incontinence may be a more severe manifestation of urinary urgency, rather than urinary urgency and urgency urinary incontinence being distinct entities.

Factors predicting the treatment success of bladder training for urgency urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of bladder training (BT) for urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and to determine women characteristics that are predictors for success. METHODS: Clinical data of 110 women with UUI who had received BT over 8 weeks were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were evaluated in terms of incontinence severity (24-h pad test), 3-day voiding diary (frequency of voiding, nocturia, incontinence episodes, and the number of pads), symptom severity (OAB-V8), incontinence-related QoL (IIQ-7) and treatment success. Treatment success was evaluated at a ≥50% reduction in incontinence episodes at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement was found in all parameters (incontinence severity, frequency of voiding, nocturia, incontinence episodes and the number of pads, symptom severity, and incontinence-related QoL) at the end of the treatment compared to the baseline values in women with UUI who had received BT (p < 0.001). The treatment success rate was 35.5%. In the multivariate analysis (OR, 95% CI), the treatment was found to be more successful in women with higher education levels (p = 0.012, p = 0.029) and of younger ages (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the BT given to women with UUI is effective in reducing incontinence severity, frequency, nocturia, incontinence episodes, number of pads, symptom severity, and improving QoL. Young age and high education levels are the predictive factors in the treatment success of BT in women with UUI. For this reason, these predictive factors should be considered in determining the treatment strategy for women with UUI.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Urinary Incontinence.

CONTEXT: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition in elderly men causing a severe worsening of quality of life, and a significant cost for both patients and health systems. OBJECTIVE: To report a practical, evidence-based, guideline on definitions, pathophysiology, diagnostic workup, and treatment options for men with different forms of UI. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive literature search, limited to studies representing high levels of evidence and published in the English language, was performed. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. A level of evidence and a grade of recommendation were assigned. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: UI can be classified into stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and mixed urinary incontinence. A detailed description of the pathophysiology and diagnostic workup has been reported. Simple clinical interventions, behavioural and physical modifications, and pharmacological treatments comprise the initial management for all kinds of UI. Surgery for SUI includes bulking agents, male sling, and compression devices. Surgery for UUI includes bladder wall injection of botulinum toxin A, sacral nerve stimulation, and cystoplasty/urinary diversion. CONCLUSIONS: This 2022 European Association of Urology guideline summary provides updated information on definition, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of male UI. PATIENT SUMMARY: Male urinary incontinence comprises a broad subject area, much of which has been covered for the first time in the literature in a single manuscript. The European Association of Urology Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Guideline Panel has released this new guidance, with the aim to provide updated information for urologists to be able to follow diagnostic and therapeutic indications for optimising patient care.

Healthcare resource use and cost burden of urinary incontinence to United States payers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess healthcare resource utilization and costs for female patients diagnosed with stress or mixed urinary incontinence (SUI/MUI) compared to a matched cohort of patients without SUI/MUI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study of women using the IBM MarketScan research database. Women diagnosed with SUI/MUI between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016 were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 codes for SUI or MUI with the date of first diagnosis as the index date from which 2-year postindex healthcare resource use and direct cost data were derived from claims, examined, and compared 1:1 with patients without a SUI/MUI diagnosis, matched by age and Charlson's Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: A total of 68 636 women with SUI/MUI were matched 1:1 with controls. In the 2-year postindex date, a significantly higher proportion of SUI/MUI patients had ≥1 inpatient visit and ≥1 outpatient visit compared to the control group (inpatient: 18.89% vs. 12.10%, p < 0.0001; outpatient: 88.44% vs. 73.23%, p < 0.0001). Mean primary care visits were significantly higher in SUI/MUI patients compared to controls (7.33 vs. 5.53; p < 0.0001) as were specialist visits (1.2 vs. 0.08; p < 0.0001). Mean all-cause outpatient costs were higher in SUI/MUI patients compared to controls ($7032.10 vs. $3348.50; p < 0.0001), as were inpatient costs ($3990.70 vs. $2313.70; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Women with SUI/MUI consume significantly higher medical resources and incur higher costs to payers, compared to women without SUI/MUI. While reasons for this are not fully understood, improved and standardized treatment for women with SUI/MUI may positively affect cost and outcomes.

¿Existe concordancia entre vejiga hiperactiva e hiperactividad del detrusor en varones con síntomas predominantemente de llenado derivados a Unidades de Urología Funcional y Urodinámica? / Is there concordance between overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity in men with predominant storage urinary symptoms referred to Functional Urology and Urodynamics Units?

Objetivo Estudiar el grado de concordancia diagnóstica entre vejiga hiperactiva (VH) e hiperactividad del detrusor (HD) en varones con síntomas del tracto urinario inferior (STUI) predominantemente de llenado, y el perfil clínico y urodinámico según presencia de HD y grado de obstrucción del tracto urinario inferior (OTUI).Material y métodos Estudio epidemiológico, transversal, multicéntrico y nacional. Se cumplimentaron: diario miccional de 3 días (DM3d), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) y Cuestionario de Autoevaluación del Control de la Vejiga (CACV). Se determinó el volumen prostático (Vp) por ecografía y se realizó estudio urodinámico (EUD). Se analizó la prevalencia de VH y HD y la concordancia (kappa). Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de características clínicas y urodinámicas; posteriormente se comparó su frecuencia según presencia de HD y OTUI.ResultadosSe evaluaron 445 pacientes con edad media±DE de 54,8±9,9 años. Según el DM3d, un 89,8% presentaba frecuencia miccional aumentada, un 87,9% nicturia, un 72,8% urgencia y un 31,9% incontinencia urinaria de urgencia (IUU). Un 36,8% tenía OTUI. El 54,5% presentaba VH y HD. La concordancia diagnóstica entre HD y VH fue baja (κ=0,1702). Más pacientes con HD que sin ella presentaron urgencia (DM3d y CACV; p<0,001), IUU (DM3d; p=0,008) y nicturia (CACV; p<0,001). Hubo diferencias en IPSS-vaciado, flujo máximo (Qmax) y residuo posmiccional (p<0,05) según el grado de obstrucción.ConclusionesEn pacientes varones de 18 a 65 años con STUI predominantemente de llenado derivados a unidades especializadas, aproximadamente la mitad tienen coexistencia de VH y HD y un tercio tenía obstrucción. Hay baja concordancia diagnóstica entre VH y HD (AU)

Objective To assess the diagnostic concordance of overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor overactivity (DO) in male patients with predominant storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and evaluate their clinical and urodynamic profile according to DO presence and degree of obstruction.Material and methods Epidemiological, cross-sectional multicenter study. A 3-day bladder diary (3dBD), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ) questionnaires were analyzed. Prostate volume was determined by ultrasound. Urodynamic study (UDS) tests were performed. The prevalence of OAB and DO and the degree of clinical concordance (kappa index) were investigated. Descriptive analysis of clinical variables and UDS results was performed, followed by comparisons based on the presence of DO and degree of obstruction.ResultsA total of 445 patients were included. The mean age was (SD) 54.8 (9.9) years. According to 3dBD, 89.9% presented increased urinary frequency, 87.9% nocturia, 72.1% urgency, and 31.9% urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Obstruction was present in 36.8%. Concomitant OAB and DO were present in 54.5%. The degree of diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO was low (κ=0.1772). There were more patients with DO presenting urgency (3dBD and B-SAQ; p<0.001), UUI (3dBD; p=0.008) and nocturia (B-SAQ; p<0.001). Differences were found in terms of prostate volume, IPSS-voiding, maximum flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (p<0.05) according to the obstruction degree.ConclusionsApproximately 50% of male patients aged 18-65 years old with predominant storage LUTS, referred to specialized units, have both OAB and DO. Obstruction is present on 1/3. Diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO is poor (AU)

Is there concordance between overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity in men with predominant storage urinary symptoms referred to Functional Urology and Urodynamics Units?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic concordance of overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor overactivity (DO) in male patients with predominant storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and evaluate their clinical and urodynamic profile according to DO presence and degree of obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Epidemiological, cross-sectional multicenter study. A 3-day bladder diary (3dBD), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ) questionnaires were analyzed. Prostate volume was determined by ultrasound. Urodynamic study (UDS) tests were performed. The prevalence of OAB and DO and the degree of clinical concordance (kappa index) were investigated. Descriptive analysis of clinical variables and UDS results was performed, followed by comparisons based on the presence of DO and degree of obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 445 patients were included. The mean age was (SD) 54.8 (9.9) years. According to 3dBD, 89.9% presented increased urinary frequency, 87.9% nocturia, 72.1% urgency, and 31.9% urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Obstruction was present in 36.8%. Concomitant OAB and DO were present in 54.5%. The degree of diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO was low (κ = 0.1772). There were more patients with DO presenting urgency (3dBD and B-SAQ; p < 0.001), UUI (3dBD; p = 0.008) and nocturia (B-SAQ; p < 0.001). Differences were found in terms of prostate volume, IPSS-voiding, maximum flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (p < 0.05) according to the obstruction degree. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 50% of male patients aged 18-65 years old with predominant storage LUTS, referred to specialized units, have both OAB and DO. Obstruction is present on 1/3. Diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO is poor.

Female Urgency, Trial of Urodynamics as Routine Evaluation (FUTURE study): a superiority randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of invasive urodynamic investigations in management of women with refractory overactive bladder symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a symptom complex affecting 12-14% of the UK adult female population. Symptoms include urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, increased daytime urinary frequency and nocturia. OAB has a negative impact on women's social, physical, and psychological wellbeing. Initial treatment includes lifestyle modifications, bladder retraining, pelvic floor exercises and pharmacological therapy. However, these measures are unsuccessful in 25-40% of women (refractory OAB). Before considering invasive treatments, such as Botulinum toxin injection or sacral neuromodulation, most guidelines recommend urodynamics to confirm diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO). However, urodynamics may fail to show evidence of DO in up to 45% of cases, hence the need to evaluate its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. FUTURE (Female Urgency, Trial of Urodynamics as Routine Evaluation) aims to test the hypothesis that, in women with refractory OAB, urodynamics and comprehensive clinical assessment is associated with superior patient-reported outcomes following treatment and is more cost-effective, compared to comprehensive clinical assessment only. METHODS: FUTURE is a pragmatic, multi-centre, superiority randomised controlled trial. Women aged ≥ 18 years with refractory OAB or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, and who have failed/not tolerated conservative and medical treatment, are considered for trial entry. We aim to recruit 1096 women from approximately 60 secondary/tertiary care hospitals across the UK. All consenting women will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 15 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome is participant-reported success at 15 months post-randomisation measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The primary economic outcome is incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 15 months. The secondary outcomes include adverse events, impact on other urinary symptoms and health-related quality of life. Qualitative interviews with participants and clinicians and a health economic evaluation will also be conducted. The statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be by intention-to-treat. Results will be presented as estimates and 95% CIs. DISCUSSION: The FUTURE study will inform patients, clinicians and policy makers whether routine urodynamics improves treatment outcomes in women with refractory OAB and whether it is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN63268739 . Registered on 14 September 2017.

Evaluation and management of female urinary incontinence.

INTRODUCTION Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition in all demographics of women and consists of stress UI (SUI), Urgency UI (UUI), and mixed UI (MUI). Treatment includes lifestyle modifications, medical treatment, and surgery depending on the type of UI and severity of symptoms. This review is an update on the evaluation and management of UI in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review article covers the evaluation and management options for UI in women and includes the most recent guidelines from the American Urological Association (AUA) as well as recently published literature on the management of UI. RESULTS: Any evaluation of UI should include a thorough targeted history and physical, and counseling for treatment should consider patient goals and desired outcomes. For both SUI and UUI, behavioral therapy and lifestyle modifications are effective first line treatments. Patients with UUI can benefit from medical therapy which includes anticholinergics and ß3-agonist medications, as well as neuromodulation in treatment refractory patients. SUI patients may further benefit from mechanical inserts which prevent leaks, urethral bulking agents, and surgical treatments such as the mid urethral sling and autologous fascial pubovaginal sling. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of UI in women requires a graded approach that considers patient goals and symptom severity, beginning with lifestyle and behavioral modifications before progressing to more aggressive interventions.

The effect of ß3-adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms on lower urinary tract function in males.

PURPOSE: To clarify the role of Trp64Arg polymorphisms of the gene encoding the ß3-adrenoceptor for lower urinary tract function in males, the present study investigated the association between the Trp64Arg polymorphisms and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and function. METHODS: This prospective observational study included patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Before surgery, blood samples were collected, and analyses of ß3-adrenoceptor gene polymorphism were performed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The present cohort was divided into patients with wild type (Trp64Trp) and with variant type (Trp64Arg + Arg64Arg), and LUTS and lower urinary tract function before surgery were compared between them. RESULTS: Wild type was found in 247 patients, with variant type in 129. There were no significant differences in LUTS between the two groups. Residual urine volume (PVR) (wild type: variant type = 47 ± 53 mL: 58 ± 77 mL, P = 0.04) and voiding time on uroflowmetry (wild type: variant type = 29 ± 15 s: 33 ± 17 s, P = 0.04) were significantly increased in the variant type. CONCLUSION: The Trp64Arg variant of the ß3-adrenoceptor gene significantly increased PVR and voiding time in men. However, it was not significantly associated with the emergence of LUTS. Thus, since the effect of ß3-adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms on the genitourinary organs might be weak, whether men possess the Trp64Arg variant of the ß3-adrenoceptor gene might not critically affect urinary quality of life, but modestly affect the lower urinary tract function.

The Effect of Cardiovascular Morbidity on Clinical Responsiveness to Anticholinergics in Postmenopausal Women With Urge Urinary Incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there is an association between severity of cardiovascular morbidity and urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and to assess the clinical responses of postmenopausal female patients in different cardiovascular risk groups to anticholinergics. METHODS: A total of 220 postmenopausal female patients aged 43-70 years old with overactive bladder with UUI between December 2019 and July 2020 were included. They were divided into 3 groups according to the Framingham risk score that calculates the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease development: low-risk (n: 90, 40.9%), intermediate-risk (n: 47, 21.3%), and high-risk (n: 83, 37.8%).Their demographic and clinical data were recorded. The intensity of UUI and its effect on quality of life (QoL) were evaluated at admission, 8th week and 16th week of anticholinergic therapy. RESULTS: At admission attendance, BMI, smoking rate, presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol level and severity of UUI were higher in the high-risk group, whereas HDL level was lower and the effect of UUI on QoL was worse (P< .001). At the 16-week follow-up the improvement of UUI severity and QoL was significantly more pronounced in the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups (P< .001).The highest daily-dryness rates were observed in the low-risk group (65.6%), while the highest rates for refractory overactive bladder (OAB) were seen in the high-risk group (19.3%). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that more severe UUI and more impaired QoL is observed in high-risk patients for cardiovascular morbidity. Individualized treatment may be important in the high-risk group since they may benefit less from anticholinergics and refractory OAB can be more common.

Incontinencia urinaria de urgencia en mujeres adultas: ¿Qué tratamientos ofrecer en APS? / Emergency Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: what treatments do we offer at PHC?

La incontinencia urinaria de urgencia corresponde a la pérdida involuntaria de orina, cuya causa es presumida multifactorial: hiperactividad del detrusor, hipersensibilidad vesical y distensibilidad reducida del detrusor. Esta patología es bastante frecuente tanto en Chile como en el mundo, con una prevalencia local entre 10% y 15%, a su vez genera un gran impacto en el bienestar físico, mental y socioeconómico del paciente. El diagnóstico es clínico, con apoyo en el uroanálisis y su tratamiento de primera línea puede ser realizado en APS. En cuanto al tratamiento existen tanto terapias no farmacológicas como farmacológicas; correspondiendo las técnicas de reentrenamiento vesical, los cambios de estilo de vida y los fármacos anticolinérgicos a tratamientos efectivos de primera línea. Existen, además, otros fármacos que pueden ser utilizados para el tratamiento de la IUU, cuya evidencia será igualmente revisada en este artículo.

Urge incontinence is defined as an involuntary leakage of urine, presumably with a multifactorial cause: detrusor overactivity, bladder hypersensibility and a reduced bladder compliance. It's a common disease worldwide, with local studies reporting a prevalence around 10-15%, causing a great impact in the physical, mental and socioeconomic well-being of the affected patients. Diagnosis is mainly based on the clinical history, supporting it with laboratory tests to rule out other conditions, and uncomplicated cases can be treated and followed in a primary care setting. There are pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies, being healthy lifestyles changes, bladder retraining programs and anticholinergic drugs the first line of treatment. Additional pharmacologic treatments will be revised in this article.

Content analysis of nursing diagnoses related to urinary incontinence. / Análise de conteúdo dos diagnósticos de enfermagem relacionados à incontinência urinária.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the content of nursing diagnoses related to urinary incontinence according to NANDA International and others identified in the literature. METHOD: Methodological study conducted with judges who were experts in urinary dysfunctions and nursing diagnosis. The analysis included diagnoses of Stress Urinary Incontinence, Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Functional Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence due to Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (previously denominated Reflex Urinary Incontinence in NANDA International's taxonomy), Mixed Urinary Incontinence, and Transient Urinary Incontinence. Wilcoxon test was applied and Content Validity Index ≥ 0.85 was considered appropriate. RESULTS: Fifty-one judges participated in this study. The judges recommended modifications in elements of all diagnoses (inclusion, exclusion or change of previous element type). CONCLUSION: The four diagnoses analyzed in NANDA International's taxonomy are recommended to be maintained with modifications; inclusion of nursing diagnoses Mixed and Transient Urinary Incontinence is also recommended.

Reproducing situationally triggered urgency incontinence in a controlled environment.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms often report urgency and incontinence episodes which are triggered by environmental scenarios, for example, "latch-key incontinence." To better understand the extent of this phenomenon, and how best to reduce its impact, we tested ways to recreate these situational cues in a controlled environment and obtain cue reactivity measures. METHODS: We developed a standardized set of urgency cue scenarios from interviews with sufferers of situational urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), personalized urgency, and safe cue sets consisting of photographs of specific locations, and measurements of cue reactivity during computer-based presentation and urodynamic monitoring. RESULTS: Common urgency and safe cues were identified for the standardized cue set. Exposure to these standardized cues elicited change in bladder sensation in 7 of 12 participants. Participants created personalized cue sets with photographs depicting their own urgency triggering scenarios; exposure to personalized cue photos elicited change in sensation in 11 of 12 participants. In addition, personalized cues elicited measurable detrusor overactivity and leakage during urodynamic monitoring. Safe cues reduced bladder sensation in five participants. CONCLUSION: We developed a computer-based means of displaying cue photos which elicited cue reactivity from women suffering from situational urgency incontinence. Cue reactivity was increased by personalizing photos of cue scenarios and obtaining physiological measures from urodynamics. We have developed an appropriate way to test cue reactivity in women with situational UUI.

Urinary Frequency as a Possibly Overlooked Symptom in COVID-19 Patients: Does SARS-CoV-2 Cause Viral Cystitis?

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a challenge for physicians in triaging patients in emergency rooms. We found a potentially dangerous overlap of classical urinary symptoms and the as yet not fully described symptoms of COVID-19. After a patient was primarily triaged as a urosepsis case and then subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19, we focused on an increase in urinary frequency as a symptom of COVID-19 and identified this in seven males out of 57 patients currently being treated in our COVID-19 wards. In the absence of any other causes, urinary frequency may be secondary to viral cystitis due to underlying COVID-19 disease. We propose consideration of urinary frequency as an anamnestic tool in patients with infective symptoms to increase awareness among urologists during the current COVID-19 pandemic to prevent fatal implications of misinterpreting urological symptoms.

A prediction model for detrusor overactivity at ambulatory urodynamics in women with urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE(S): To develop a multivariable model using both clinical examination findings and validated questionnaires' scores for predicting the presence of detrusor overactivity observed during ambulatory urodynamic monitoring in women with urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: The study population was chosen from a registry of women evaluated with urodynamics for urinary incontinence retrospectively. Data for baseline characteristics, clinical findings, and ambulatory urodynamic records were evaluated for all women included to the study. Urodynamic data were obtained by retrospective review of urodynamic traces with a standardized protocol during single voiding cycle, compatible to the standards of International Continence Society (ICS) for ambulatory urodynamic monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 395 women with urinary incontinence were included in the study. Detrusor overactivity was diagnosed in 57.1% of women included to the study. Clinical factors positively associated with detrusor overactivity were higher body-mass index (OR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.03-1.15, p < 0.001), higher OAB-V8 (Overactive bladder awareness tool - version 8) scores (OR = 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p < 0.001) and presence of urgency urinary incontinence (OR = 2.39; 95% CI 1.47-3.81, p < 0.001). The presence of postural urinary incontinence (OR = 0.51; 95%CI 0.28-0.90, p = 0.021) and insensible loss of urine (OR = 0.33; 95%CI 0.27-0.93, p = 0.005) had negative associations with detrusor overactivity in the final multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION(S): BMI, OAB-V8 scores, urgency urinary incontinence, postural urinary incontinence and insensible loss of urine were associated with the presence of detrusor overactivity according to our prediction model. However, the overall model accuracy suggests urodynamic studies are still needed for a definitive diagnosis. Nevertheless, the prediction may be beneficial for selecting a subgroup of women who are unlikely to benefit from ambulatory urodynamic monitoring for the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity.

Fecal Urgency: Clinical and Manometric Characteristics in Patients With and Without Diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Fecal urgency is classically associated with diarrhea, but is also common in individuals with normal bowel habits or constipation. Its etiology, particularly in non-diarrhea individuals, is unclear. METHODS: We examined data from 368 individuals with and without diarrhea who underwent three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion test. All patients completed the Rome III constipation module and the pelvic floor distress inventory (PDFI-20) survey. Patients were considered to have fecal urgency if they reported being bothered "moderately" or "quite a bit" by it in the past 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (28.0%) met our definition of fecal urgency. These patients were significantly more likely to meet criteria for irritable bowel syndrome and to report fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and diarrhea. Fecal urgency was associated with rectal hypersensitivity in those with diarrhea, but not in those without diarrhea. Fecal urgency was associated with urinary urge incontinence in those without diarrhea, but not those with diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diarrhea, fecal urgency is associated with rectal hypersensitivity, whereas in patients without diarrhea, fecal urgency is associated with urinary urge incontinence. This suggests that fecal urgency has different pathophysiological mechanisms in patients with different underlying bowel habits.