Nanoliposomal irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy: A real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), accompanied by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), is an effective and safe therapy for patients in whom metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has progressed after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and gemcitabine-based treatment failure in the real world. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the baseline characteristics, treatment courses and dosage, treatment response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse effects of patients treated with the nal-IRI-based regimen at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients who received the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen from August 2018 to June 2019 were identified. Their median age was 65 years and 52% were male. Most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, but patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 to 4 before initiation of the nal-IRI regimen were also enrolled (31%). The median dose intensity was 40.4 mg/m2 and the median treatment duration was 8.3 weeks (range: 5 days-75.7 weeks). Objective response and disease control rates were 10.4% and 38.8%, respectively. The median OS)was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6-10.1 months) and the median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.6-4.1 months). Elevated total bilirubin (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.31, 95% CI: 1.21-15.30, p = 0.024), carcinomatosis (HR: 3.75, 95% CI: 1.46-9.66, p = 0.006), and previous treatment with irinotecan (HR: 4.86, 95% CI: 1.67-14.10, p = 0.004) were associated with a worse OS. Previous treatment with irinotecan (HR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.22-7.49, p = 0.02) was associated with a worse PFS. The most common all-grade adverse effects were anemia (73.9%), nausea (66.2%), and fatigue (61.5%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse effects were neutropenia (21.5%), anemia (18.5%), and diarrhea (15.4%). CONCLUSION: Clinically, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is effective and tolerable at reduced doses in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma that has progressed after gemcitabine-based therapy.

Irinotecan monotherapy as third- or further-line treatment for patients with small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive cancer and recurrence is inevitable. Treatment of recurrent disease is important for improving the prognosis of patients with SCLC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan monotherapy as third- or further-line treatment in patients with SCLC. RESULTS: Data of 15 patients who had received irinotecan monotherapy as third- or further-line treatment between 2004 and 2019 were analyzed. The median progression-free survival duration (95% confidence interval) from the initiation of treatment with irinotecan was 2.7 (1.4-3.8) months, and the median overall survival duration (95% confidence interval) from the initiation of irinotecan treatment was 10.0 (3.9-12.9) months. Partial response, stable disease or non-complete response/non-progressive disease, and progressive disease were observed in 1, 6, and 8 patients, respectively. Adverse events ⩾ grade 3 in severity were observed in 2/2 (100%) patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1 mutation, 2/3 (66.7%) patients who were heterozygous for UGT1A1 mutation, 4/6 (66.7%) patients who had wild-type UGT1A1, and 2/4 (50.0%) patients in whom the UGT1A1 mutation status was unknown. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that irinotecan monotherapy can be a useful alternative treatment option in the third-line setting for patients with SCLC.

pH-responsive and folate-coated liposomes encapsulating irinotecan as an alternative to improve efficacy of colorectal cancer treatment.

Irinotecan (IRN) is a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin that acts as a topoisomerase I inhibitor. IRN is used worldwide for the treatment of several types of cancer, including colorectal cancer, however its use can lead to serious adverse effects, as diarrhea and myelosuppression. Liposomes are widely used as drug delivery systems that can improve chemotherapeutic activity and decrease side effects. Liposomes can also be pH-sensitive to release its content preferentially in acidic environments, like tumors, and be surface-functionalized for targeting purposes. Herein, we developed a folate-coated pH-sensitive liposome as a drug delivery system for IRN to reach improved tumor therapy without potential adverse events. Liposomes were prepared containing IRN and characterized for particle size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, concentration, encapsulation, cellular uptake, and release profile. Antitumor activity was investigated in a murine model of colorectal cancer, and its toxicity was evaluated by hematological/biochemical tests and histological analysis of main organs. The results showed vesicles smaller than 200 nm with little dispersion, a surface charge close to neutral, and high encapsulation rate of over 90%. The system demonstrated prolonged and sustained release in pH-dependent manner with high intracellular drug delivery capacity. Importantly, the folate-coated pH-sensitive formulation had significantly better antitumor activity than the pH-dependent system only or the free drug. Tumor tissue of IRN-containing groups presented large areas of necrosis. Furthermore, no evidence of systemic toxicity was found for the groups investigated. Thus, our developed nanodrug IRN delivery system can potentially be an alternative to conventional colorectal cancer treatment.

Elucidating the role of pharmacogenetics in irinotecan efficacy and adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Irinotecan is a cytotoxic agent that is widely used in the treatment of several types of solid tumors. However, although it is generally well tolerated, approximately 20% to 35% of patients develop severe toxicity, particularly delayed-type diarrhea and neutropenia. As the incidence of such toxicities is often associated with the UGT1A1 *28/*28, *6/*28 and *6/*6 genotypes, individualized dosing could reduce these adverse events. Furthermore, prospective trials have shown that patients harboring the UGT1A1 *1/*1 and *1/*28 genotypes can tolerate higher doses of irinotecan, which may in turn impact on a better outcome. Upfront UGT1A1 genotyping could therefore be a usefulness strategy in order to individualize irinotecan dosing, but consensus on the recommended dose based on the UGT1A1 genotype is still lacking. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the results of the main pharmacogenetic studies focused on irinotecan. We provide an overview of current evidence and recommendations for individualized dosing of irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. EXPERT OPINION: Implementation of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 genotyping in clinical practice is a first step toward personalizing irinotecan therapy. This approach is likely to improve patient care and reduce healthcare costs. Future large and prospective studies will help to clarify the clinical value of other genetic markers in irinotecan treatment personalization.

Minimal contribution of the hepatic uptake transporter OATP1B1 to the inter-individual variability in SN-38 pharmacokinetics in cancer patients without severe renal failure.

PURPOSE: SN-38, a pharmacologically active metabolite of irinotecan, is taken up into hepatocytes by organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1. The effects of functional OATP1B1 521T>C on the pharmacokinetics of SN-38 remain controversial. Here, we prospectively examined the effects of OATP1B1 function on the area under the plasma total or unbound concentration-time curve (tAUC or uAUC) of SN-38 by assessing OATP1B1 521T>C and the plasma levels of endogenous OATP1B1 substrates, coproporphyrin (CP)-I and III, in cancer patients treated with irinotecan. METHODS: We enrolled cancer patients who were treated with an irinotecan-containing regimen and did not have severe renal failure. The total and unbound concentrations of SN-38 in the plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. AUC values were calculated and normalized to the actual irinotecan dose (AUC/dose). The OATP1B1 521T>C was analyzed by direct sequencing. Concentrations of the endogenous substrates in plasma before irinotecan treatment (baseline) were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with a median estimated glomerular filtration rate of 74.8 mL/min (range 32.6-99.6) were examined. Both tAUC/dose and uAUC/dose were associated with the grade of neutropenia; however, they were not associated with OATP1B1 521T>C or baseline CP-I and III levels. It is worth noting that these baseline concentrations were significantly higher in patients with OATP1B1 521C, supporting functional changes in OATP1B1. CONCLUSION: The contribution of OATP1B1 activity to inter-patient variability in the systemic exposure to SN-38 is likely minimal in patients without severe renal failure.

Randomized phase 2 study comparing irinotecan versus amrubicin as maintenance therapy after first-line induction therapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer (HOT1401/NJLCG1401).

BACKGROUND: A cisplatin plus irinotecan (CPT-11) regimen is used for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Amrubicin (AMR) is primarily used for relapsed SCLC. The HOT1401/NJLCG1401 trial, an open-label randomized phase II trial, was designed to assess the benefit of maintenance therapy in patients with ED-SCLC who responded to induction therapy. METHODS: Patients with histologically- or cytologically-confirmed ED-SCLC were included and were treated with an induction therapy of four cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1) plus CPT-11 (60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) every four weeks. After induction therapy, patients who had nonprogressive disease were randomized to receive either maintenance CPT-11 (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) every three weeks, or AMR (35 mg/m2 on days 1-3) every three weeks. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled; 20 patients had progressive disease or received incomplete induction chemotherapy. Finally, 14 patients were randomly assigned to receive CPT-11 (n = 7) or AMR (n = 7). This study was terminated prematurely because of low patient accrual. The overall objective response rate was 73%, the median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6-11.8), and the median overall survival was 20.1 months (95% CI: 13.7-not reached). No statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) were noted between patients treated with CPT-11 and those treated with AMR. There were no treatment-related deaths in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance therapy with CPT-11 or AMR after induction therapy might be effective in some patients.

Phase I study of liposomal irinotecan (LY01610) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This phase I trial was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LY01610, a novel liposome-encapsulated irinotecan, in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: This trial was conducted in two stages. In the dose-escalation stage, patients with advanced ESCC refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy received escalating doses of LY01610. A recommended dose based on patient tolerance was then expanded in the second stage. LY01610 was administered intravenously every 2 weeks, except that the first cycle in dose escalation was 3 weeks to allow observation of DLTs. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled across 4 dose levels (30, 60, 90 and 120 mg/m2). The DLTs included vomiting and febrile neutropenia, and the MTD was 90 mg/m2. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia in six patients (25.0%), anemia in six patients (25.0%) and neutropenia in five patients (20.8%). One patient achieved complete response, and four had partial response, including one patient receiving LY01610 at the starting dose of 30 mg/m2. Compared with conventional irinotecan, the PK profile of LY01610 was characterized by increased and prolonged exposure of total irinotecan and the active metabolite SN-38 in plasma. CONCLUSION: LY01610 demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced ESCC. Future clinical development of LY01610 as single agent or in combination with other anti-cancer agents in treating ESCC patients is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04088604 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Inhalation delivery dramatically improves the efficacy of topotecan for the treatment of local and distant lung cancer.

Topotecan is potent anti-cancer drug approved for various malignancies but hematopoietic toxicities undermine its wider application and use of its most effective dose. This study aims to improve these limitations through inhalation-delivery. The pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity of 2-5 times lower inhalation doses of topotecan dry-powder were compared with the standard intravenous (IV) delivery once/twice-a-week. Human-derived EGFR-mutant (H1975), KRAS-mutant (A549), and EGFR/KRAS wild-type (H358) orthotopic and distant lung tumors were evaluated in murine models. Inhalation of 1 mg/kg topotecan significantly improved the half-life and drug exposure (area under the curve, AUC) compared to 5 mg/kg via IV-delivery. AUCs (h*ng/mL) for inhaled/IV topotecan in plasma, lung, liver, and brain were, 831/888, 60,000/1080, 8380/4000, and 297/15, respectively; while the half-life was also greatly increased in these tissues. The average lung tumor burden of H358-derived tumors was reduced from 15.0 g to 8.4 g (44%) in rats treated once-a-week with 2 mg/kg IV and 1.8 g (88%) with 1 mg/kg inhaled topotecan, corroborating previous findings using A549- and H1975-derived orthotopic lung tumors. Importantly, inhaled topotecan showed superior efficacy in suppressing lung tumors at distant sites. The growth of H1975- and H358-derived subcutaneous xenografts were completely arrested and A549-derived tumors were significantly reduced in mice treated twice-a-week with 1 mg/kg inhaled topotecan compared to a minor (H1975 and H358) or no reduction (A549) with twice-a-week 5 mg/kg IV topotecan.

Possible roles of intestinal P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A on the limited oral absorption of irinotecan.

OBJECTIVES: Irinotecan is a widely intravenously used drug for the treatment of certain types of solid tumours. The oral administration of irinotecan has recently been recognized as being a more effective method for the treatment than intravenous administration. However, the limited oral bioavailability of irinotecan poses a problem for its oral delivery. In this study, we report on an investigation of the mechanism responsible for the limited oral absorption of irinotecan using rats as models. METHODS: The intestinal absorption of irinotecan in the absence and presence of several compounds was examined using intestinal loop method. The pharmacokinetics of irinotecan was investigated when verapamil, an inhibitor of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) was pre-administered. KEY FINDINGS: The intestinal absorption of irinotecan was enhanced in the presence of verapamil, indicating that efflux by intestinal P-gp contributes to its limited oral absorption. Indeed, the oral bioavailability of irinotecan was increased when verapamil was orally pre-administered. This increased oral bioavailability was accompanied by a slight but significant decrease in the formation of a metabolite produced by the action of CYP3A. CONCLUSION: The findings presented herein suggest that intestinal efflux by P-gp is mainly and intestinal metabolism by CYP3A is partially responsible for the limited oral absorption of irinotecan.

A novel irinotecan-lipiodol nanoemulsion for intravascular administration: pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in the normal and tumor bearing rat liver.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the United States and treatment options are limited for patients who develop liver metastases. Several chemotherapeutic regimens have been used for transvascular liver-directed therapy in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases without clear evidence of superiority of one therapy over another. We describe the development of a novel nanoemulsion through combining irinotecan (IRI), a first line systemic agent used for the treatment of colon cancer, with lipiodol, an oily contrast medium derived from poppy seed oil, and evaluated its pharmacokinetic and biodistribution profile as a function of portal venous chemoembolization (PVCE) versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) delivery. The Tessari technique was used to create a stable emulsion (20 mg IRI mixed with 2 mL lipiodol) with resultant particle size ranging from 28.9 nm to 56.4 nm. Pharmacokinetic profile established through venous sampling in Buffalo rats demonstrate that the area under the curve (AUC0-∞) of IRI was significantly less after PVCE with IRI-lipiodol as compared to IRI alone (131 vs. 316 µg*min/mL, p-value = .023), suggesting significantly higher amounts of IRI retention in the liver with the IRI-lipiodol nanoemulsion via first-pass extraction. Subseqent biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing WAG/Rjj rats revealed more IRI present in the tumor following TACE versus PVCE (29.19 ± 12.33 µg/g versus 3.42 ± 1.62; p-value = .0033) or IV (29.19 ± 12.33 µg/g versus 1.05 ± 0.47; p-value = .0035). The IRI-lipiodol nanoemulsion demonstrated an acceptable hepatotoxicity profile in all routes of administration. In conclusion, the IRI-lipiodol nanoemulsion via TACE showed promise and warrants further investigation as an option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Efficacy of topotecan nanoparticles for intravitreal chemotherapy of retinoblastoma.

Retinoblastoma (Rb) is the most common intraocular malignancy in children that accounts for approximately 4% of all pediatric malignancies. Since chemotherapy is a widely practiced treatment for Rb, there is a growing interest in developing new and effective drugs to overcome systemic and local side effects of chemotherapy to improve the quality of life and increase the chances of survival. This study sought to fabricate thiolated chitosan nanoparticles containing topotecan (TPH-TCs-NPs) with a view of enhancing drug loading and release control. This research was also designed to assess the ability of TPH-TCs-NPs to improve cell association, increase treatment efficacy in retinoblastoma cells and xenograft-rat-model of retinoblastoma, and overcome current topotecan hydrochloride (TPH) intravitreal administration challenges, including stability loss and poor cellular uptake. Modified ionic gelation method was optimized to fabricate TPH-TCs-NPs and TPH-TMC-NPs (N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles containing TPH). We characterized the NPs and quantified topotecan loading and release against a free TPH standard. The efficacy of TPH-NPs was quantified in human retinoblastoma cells (Y79) by XTT and flow cytometry measurement. In addition, Y79 cells were injected intravitreally in both eyes of immunodeficient wistar albino rats to create a xenograft-rat-model to compare the antitumor effectiveness of TPH-NPs and TPH by intravitreal administration. TPH-NPs complexation was confirmed by EDX, FTIR, and DSC techniques. TPH-TCs-NPs and TPH-TMC-NPs had high encapsulation efficiency (85.23 ± 2 and 73.34 ± 2% respectively). TPH-TCs-NPs showed a mean diameter, polidispersity index, and zeta potential of 25±2 nm, 0.21 ± 0.03 and +12 ± 2 mV, respectively. As a function of dose, TCs and TMC NPs were more efficacious than free topotecan (IC50s 53.17 and 85.88 nM, relative to 138.30 nM respectively, P = 0.012). Kruskal-Wallis test showed a statistically significant difference between the groups. Additionally, a significant difference between the tumor control and TPH-TCs-NPs treated group in xenograft-rat-model ( Range of P-value: 0.026 to 0.035) was shown by Bonferroni post hoc test. The current investigation demonstrated enhanced efficacy and association of TPH-TCs-NPs relative to free TPH in retinoblastoma cells and tumor in vitro and in vivo.

Berberine-10-hydroxy camptothecine-loaded lipid microsphere for the synergistic treatment of liver cancer by inhibiting topoisomerase and HIF-1α.

10-HCPT is a topoisomerase I inhibitor effective in the treatment of liver cancer but its use is hampered by its resistance. The expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is reportedly upregulated in liver cancer tissues, which is directly linked to the resistance of 10-HCPT. While BBR can significantly decrease the level of HIF-1α according to the literature report. Thus, the aim of this study was to prepare a novel intravenous 10-HCPT-BBR-loaded lipid microsphere (LM) and evaluate their synergistic effect on liver cancer treatment. The optimal preparation mainly included 10.0% oil phase (medium-chain triglyceride:long-chain triglyceride = 1:1), emulsifier (egg lecithin E80 and pluronic F68), antioxidant (0.02% NaHSO3), and pH regulator (0.1 mol/L Hcl). Then, the behaviors of BBR-10-HCPT loaded LM in vitro and in vivo were systematically investigated. In vitro, it showed an obvious sustained-release effect in different release mediums, good physicochemical stability at accelerated and long-term storage conditions, and great anti-proliferative capability toward human liver cancer Hep-3B cells. In vivo, the prepared LM exhibited a longer half-life and higher AUC compared to BBR injection and 10-HCPT injection. More importantly, it was found that The LM was distributed more in the liver, spleen, and tumors, but less in the lungs and heart, especially in the lung. And then, it showed significant inhibition of tumor growth against nude mouse with Hep-3B tumor, and the tumor inhibition rate reached 91.55%. Thus, the data obtained in our study suggested that BBR combined with 10-HCPT can raise curative effect and reduce the toxicity of 10-HCPT.

Is intravitreal topotecan toxic to retinal function?

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injections of topotecan are used in the management of retinoblastoma with vitreous seeds. This study evaluated whether intravitreal topotecan was associated with retinal toxicity. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with retinoblastoma who were treated with intravitreal topotecan at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between December 2014 and May 2019. Electroretinogram (ERG) responses under anaesthesia were measured immediately before treatment with intravitreal topotecan and at the next visitor approximately one-month. Ocular toxicity was defined by a decrease in the ERG response at 30 Hz at follow-up. RESULTS: Ocular toxicity was evaluated by ERG on 50 evaluable injections administered to 28 eyes. 22 (44.0%) injections were performed with concurrent intravitreal melphalan. The median time to ERG measurement following an injection was 27 days. By using a paired t-test, intravitreal topotecan combined with melphalan (n=22) at a dose of 25 µg or 30 µg was associated with a significant decrease in ERG amplitude at follow-up (p=0.046, 95% CI -20.4 µV to -0.2 µV). Among eyes that only received topotecan (n=28) at doses of 20 µg or 30 µg, there was not a significant difference in ERG amplitude measured (p=0.85, 95% CI -7.0 µV to 5.8 µV). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal topotecan combined with intravitreal melphalan was associated with a decrease in ERG amplitude; there was not a significant decrease in ERG amplitude observed in patients who received topotecan alone. These findings suggest that intravitreal topotecan injections at doses of 20 µg or 30 µg are not associated with retinal toxicity in patients with retinoblastoma.

Intra-arterial Chemotherapy as Primary Treatment for Cavitary Retinoblastoma: Excellent Response in Eight Tumors.

PURPOSE: The "cavitary" form of retinoblastoma has historically demonstrated minimal treatment response with intravenous chemoreduction, showing less robust regression and less reduction in tumor size. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has been reported to more effectively treat retinoblastoma, allowing many previously unsalvageable eyes to now be saved. The purpose was to report treatment response of cavitary retinoblastoma tumors to IAC. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients presenting with cavitary retinoblastoma who were treated with IAC. METHODS: Retrospective case series of all patients presenting with cavitary retinoblastoma between August 2014 and January 2019 who were treated with primary IAC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor regression, recurrence, resolution of vitreous and subretinal seeds, number of treatments required, globe salvage, metastasis, and death. RESULTS: Eight cavitary retinoblastoma tumors in 6 eyes of 4 patients were treated with IAC. One hundred percent of the cavitary tumors regressed (8/8 tumors, in 6/6 eyes), and 100% of vitreous and subretinal seeds regressed, with 100% globe salvage. None of the tumors recurred, no patients developed metastases, and no patients died. Eyes were treated with a median of 4.5 cycles of IAC (range, 1-7), with fewer IAC treatments used in the later patients (1-3 treatments per eye for the most recent 3 eyes, compared with 6-7 treatments per eye for the earliest 3 eyes). Mean reduction in thickness was 73.4% (range, 59.7%-84.6%). Mean reduction in basal diameter was 45.5% (range, 24.8%-56.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IAC results in regression of cavitary retinoblastoma, often with greater reduction in tumor size than has been reported previously with intravenous chemotherapy (IVC). Using up-front triple therapy (e.g., melphalan 0.4 mg/kg, carboplatin 50 mg, and topotecan 2 mg) and noting certain subtle signs of early regression can help to minimize unnecessary additional cycles of treatment.

The Addition of Topotecan to Melphalan in the Treatment of Retinoblastoma with Intra-arterial Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of adding topotecan to melphalan for the treatment of retinoblastoma using intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC). DESIGN: Single-center, consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: All eyes treated with IAC at the University of Siena, Siena, Italy, from 2008 to 2019. METHODS: Eyes were treated via IAC with either melphalan monotherapy or melphalan plus topotecan. The characteristics and outcomes of these 2 groups were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was globe salvage rate. Additionally, a complete summary of all adverse events for all eyes was compared between groups and included local, regional, and systemic events causing both transient and permanent effects. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients and 208 eyes were treated with IAC between April 2008 and October 2019. Melphalan alone (MA) was used to treat 44 patients and 50 eyes for a total of 191 procedures. The combination of melphalan plus topotecan (MPT) was used to treat 149 patients and 158 eyes for a total of 780 procedures. Groups were similar in terms of age at presentation. The MPT group included more advanced eyes (P < 0.001) and had shorter follow-up time (mean 47 vs. 120 months in the MA group, P < 0.001). The MPT group required less laser and cryotherapy after treatment (32% of eyes vs. 50% of eyes in the MA group, P < 0.001); there was no other difference in the number of adjuvant treatments required between groups. There was no difference in the number of acute adverse events, both systemic and local, between groups. There was no difference in the number of transient or permanent intraocular side effects between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated a better globe salvage rate in the MPT group (66%) compared with the MA group (58%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, the addition of topotecan to melphalan did not alter the IAC side effect profile and may contribute to improved globe salvage.

Irinotecan-induced intestinal mucositis in mice: a histopathological study.

PURPOSE: Intestinal mucositis is an important adverse effect of antineoplastic therapy, which remains without adequate treatment. The present study aimed to carry out a complete evaluation of the histopathological changes during irinotecan-induced intestinal mucositis, using the protocol most found in the pharmacological reports nowadays to better understand irinotecan toxicity and support future studies on drug discovery. METHODS: Intestinal mucositis was induced by treating swiss mice for 4 days with irinotecan (75 mg/kg, i.p.). After 72 h post irinotecan, the mice were sacrificed and the small intestine and colon were excised to performed histological analysis by stained tissue with hematoxylin/eosin (H&E). RESULTS: Histoarchitecture loss, villus/crypt ratio reduction, atrophy of the muscular layer, hypertrophy in the submucosal and mucous layers, ruptures in the epithelium, as well as extent cellular infiltrate and presence of micro abscesses and the fusion of the crypts were observed in the histological analysis. Moreover, duodenum and colon had increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and mitotic figures. However, submucosal ganglia were decreased in the duodenum and increased in the colon. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained in the present study provides new evidence that irinotecan-induced intestinal mucositis highly affects small intestine and colon, further contributing to establish criteria in light of the histopathological changes induced by irinotecan during intestinal mucositis and facilitating inter-study comparisons.

The AI-discovered aetiology of COVID-19 and rationale of the irinotecan+ etoposide combination therapy for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

We present the AI-discovered aetiology of COVID-19, based on a precise disease model of COVID-19 built under five weeks that best matches the epidemiological characteristics, transmission dynamics, clinical features, and biological properties of COVID-19 and consistently explains the rapidly expanding COVID-19 literature. We present that SARS-CoV-2 implements a unique unbiased survival strategy of balancing viral replication with viral spread by increasing its dependence on (i) ACE2-expressing cells for viral entry and spread, (ii) PI3K signaling in ACE2-expressing cells for viral replication and egress, and (iii) viral- non-structural-and-accessory-protein-dependent immunomodulation to balance viral spread and viral replication. We further propose the combination of irinotecan (an in-market topoisomerase I inhibitor) and etoposide (an in-market topoisomerase II inhibitor) could potentially be an exceptionally effective treatment to protect critically ill patients from death caused by COVID-19-specific cytokine storms triggered by sepsis, ARDS, and other fatal comorbidities.

Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Capecitabine and Irinotecan Guided by UGT1A1 Status in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Differentiating the irinotecan dose on the basis of the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) genotype improves the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. In this study, we further investigated preoperative irinotecan combined with capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III trial in China. Eligible patients with clinical T3-4 and/or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma, UGT1A1 genotype *1*1 or *1*28 were randomly allocated to the control group: pelvic radiation of 50 Gy/25 fractions with concurrent capecitabine, followed by oxaliplatin and capecitabine; or the experimental group: radiation with capecitabine combined with weekly irinotecan 80 mg/m2 for patients with UGT1A1*1*1 or 65 mg/m2 for patients with UGT1A1*1*28, followed by irinotecan and capecitabine. The primary end point was pCR. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02605265). RESULTS: Of the 360 patients initially enrolled, 356 were evaluated as the modified intention-to-treat population (n = 178 in both groups). Surgery was performed in 87% and 88% of patients in the control and experimental groups, respectively. The pCR rates were 15% (n = 27 of 178) and 30% (n = 53 of 178) in the control and experimental groups (risk ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.97; P = .001). Four and 6 patients achieved complete clinical response in the control and experimental groups, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 11 (6%) and 68 (38%) patients in the control and experimental groups, respectively (P < .001). The commonest grade 3-4 toxicities were leukopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhea. The overall surgical complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups (11% v 15%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Adding irinotecan guided by UGT1A1 genotype to capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly increased complete tumor response in Chinese patients.