Saliva as a potential matrix for evaluating pharmacologically active dolutegravir concentration in plasma.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is used in certain clinically selected cases and in research settings to optimize the response to antiretroviral therapy. Plasma of blood is commonly used for TDM, but blood sampling is invasive and at risk for transmission of infectious agents. On the other hand, saliva sampling is noninvasive, safe, cheap, and easily performed compared to blood. Dolutegravir (DTG) is now widely prescribed as a key component of antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection. In this study, we examined the relationship between DTG concentrations in plasma and saliva of treated patients to explore the possibility of using saliva as an alternative body fluid of TDM. A total of 17 pairs of blood and saliva samples were obtained from 15 consented HIV-1-infected subjects treated with DTG containing regimens for more than one month. Both blood and saliva samples were collected within 1 h of each other. Drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using DTG-d5 as an internal standard. The LLOQ was 0.5 ng/mL. The calibration curves were prepared with pooled plasma or saliva containing DTG in a range of 0.5-100 ng/mL with precision of <14.4% and accuracy within ±14.7%. The DTG concentrations in the plasma and saliva were significantly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.76, p < 0.001). The median ratio of the drug concentration in saliva to those in plasma was 0.0056, which is close to the rate of non-protein-bound DTG in plasma (0.70%), suggesting that only free DTG in plasma is transported to the salivary glands and secreted into saliva. The present study demonstrates that DTG concentration in saliva reflects the pharmacologically active drug concentration in plasma and may provide an easily accessible alternative for monitoring effective antiretroviral treatment.

Low plasmatic concentration of intensified antiretroviral therapy in a pregnant woman: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Identifying the most appropriate antiretroviral regimen for pregnant women with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1) infection can be challenging, mainly due to pregnancy-related physiological alterations which can significantly reduce maternal drug plasma concentration. We would like to report our experience as it consists of an unusual case of low plasmatic concentration of antiretroviral drugs despite regimen intensification in a HIV-positive pregnant woman. It also underlines the need for accurate monitoring and treatment adjustment in pregnant women with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old Brazilian woman with HIV-1 infection attending our out-patient clinic presented with low plasmatic concentration of antiretroviral drugs and persistent detectable viral load despite regimen intensification during pregnancy. Trough plasma concentrations of dolutegravir and darunavir were measured by validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. At 23 weeks of gestation it showed a lower value than expected in non-pregnant adults, compared to a normal level of plasma concentration measured at 10 weeks after delivery. Our patient and the baby had no regimen-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Physiological changes during pregnancy can affect pharmacokinetics and reduce a mother's bioavailability of antiretroviral drugs, potentially altering their pharmacological activity. A personalized treatment and a careful follow-up are hence mandatory for this key population.

Drug resistance emergence in macaques administered cabotegravir long-acting for pre-exposure prophylaxis during acute SHIV infection.

A long-acting injectable formulation of the HIV integrase inhibitor cabotegravir (CAB-LA) is currently in clinical development for PrEP. Although the long plasma half-life of CAB-LA is an important attribute for PrEP, it also raises concerns about drug resistance emergence if someone becomes infected with HIV, or if PrEP is initiated during undiagnosed acute infection. Here we use a macaque model of SHIV infection to model risks of drug resistance to CAB-LA PrEP. Six macaques infected with SHIV received CAB-LA before seroconversion. We show integrase mutations G118R, E92G/Q, or G140R in plasma from 3/6 macaques as early as day 57, and identify G118R and E92Q in viruses from vaginal and rectal fluids. G118R and G140R confer > 800-fold resistance to CAB and cross-resistance to all licensed integrase inhibitors. Our results emphasize the need for appropriate HIV testing strategies before and possibly shortly after initiating CAB LA PrEP to exclude acute infection.

A potential drug interaction between phenobarbital and dolutegravir: A case report.

In this report, we describe a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patient in whom changes in phenobarbital (PB) dosage resulted in associated changes in plasma concentrations of dolutegravir (DTG). His plasma concentrations of DTG were 0.934, 0.584, 1.003 and 3.25 µg/mL, respectively, with concomitant daily PB doses of 40, 70, 30 and 0 mg, respectively. This case suggests that PB can lead to a remarkable reduction in the plasma concentration of DTG in a dose-dependent manner.

Pharmacokinetics of a Long-Acting Nanoformulated Dolutegravir Prodrug in Rhesus Macaques.

A nanoformulated myristoylated dolutegravir prodrug (NMDTG) was prepared using good laboratory practice protocols. Intramuscular injection of NMDTG (118 ± 8 mg/ml, 25.5 mg of DTG equivalents/kg of body weight) to three rhesus macaques led to plasma DTG levels of 86 ± 12 and 28 ± 1 ng/ml on days 35 and 91, respectively. The NMDTG platform showed no significant adverse events. Further modification may further extend the drug's apparent half-life for human use.

Impact of UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms on plasma dolutegravir trough concentrations and neuropsychiatric adverse events in Japanese individuals infected with HIV-1.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir (DTG) is metabolized mainly by uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1), and partly by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A). Therefore, we focused on UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms (*6 and *28) in Japanese individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 to examine the relationship between their plasma trough concentration of DTG and gene polymorphisms. Recently, neuropsychiatric adverse events (NP-AEs) after the use of DTG have become a concern, so the association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms and selected NP-AEs was also investigated. METHODS: The study subjects were 107 Japanese patients with HIV-1 infections who were receiving DTG. Five symptoms (dizziness, headache, insomnia, restlessness, and anxiety) were selected as NP-AEs. The subjects were classified by their UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms for the group comparison of DTG trough concentration and the presence or absence of NP-AEs. RESULTS: The subjects consisted of eight (7%) *6 homozygotes, three (3%) *28 homozygotes, four (4%) for *6/*28 compound heterozygotes, 23 (21%) *6 heterozygotes, 18 (17%) *28 heterozygotes, and 51 (48%) patients carrying the normal allele. The plasma DTG trough concentration of the *6 homozygous patients was significantly higher than that of the patients carrying the normal allele (median, 1.43 and 0.82 µg/mL, respectively, p = 0.0054). The *6 and *28 heterozygous patients also showed significantly higher values than those shown by patients with the normal allele. Multivariate analysis revealed that carrying one or two UGT1A1*6 gene polymorphisms, one UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, and age of < 40 years were independent factors associated with high DTG trough concentrations. The median DTG trough concentration was significantly higher in the patients with NP-AEs (1.31 µg/mL) than in those without NP-AEs (1.01 µg/mL). Consistent with these results, subjects carrying UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28, or both alleles showed a higher cumulative incidence of having selected NP-AEs than those carrying the normal alleles (p = 0.0454). CONCLUSION: In addition to younger age, carrying UGT1A1*6 and/or UGT1A1*28 was demonstrated to be a factor associated with high DTG trough concentrations. Our results also suggest a relationship between plasma DTG trough concentrations and NP-AEs, and that carrying UGT1A1*6 and/or UGT1A1*28 alleles might be a risk factor for NP-AEs.

A Two-Way Steady-State Pharmacokinetic Interaction Study of Doravirine (MK-1439) and Dolutegravir.

INTRODUCTION: Doravirine, a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor in development for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection, has potential to be used concomitantly in antiretroviral therapy with dolutegravir, an integrase strand transfer inhibitor. The pharmacokinetic interactions between these drugs were therefore assessed. METHODS: Oral formulations of doravirine and dolutegravir were dosed both individually and concomitantly once daily in healthy adults. Twelve subjects (six were male), 23-42 years of age, were enrolled and 11 completed this phase I, open-label, three-period, fixed-sequence study per protocol; one subject was discontinued for a positive cotinine test at admission to period 2. In period 1, dolutegravir 50 mg was administered for 7 days. After a 7-day washout, doravirine 200 mg was dosed for 7 days in period 2, followed (without washout) by both doravirine and dolutegravir simultaneously for 7 days in period 3. Plasma samples were taken to determine dolutegravir and doravirine concentrations. RESULTS: The steady-state concentration 24 h post-dose (C24) of dolutegravir was not substantially altered by co-administration of doravirine multiple doses; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to 24 h post-dose (AUC0-24), maximum concentration (C max), and C24 geometric mean ratios were 1.36, 1.43, and 1.27, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of doravirine was not affected by multiple doses of dolutegravir (geometric mean ratios: 1.00, 0.98, and 1.06 for AUC0-24, C24, and C max, respectively). Both drugs were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that concomitant administration of doravirine and dolutegravir in healthy subjects causes no clinically significant alteration in the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of the two drugs, thereby supporting further evaluation of co-administration of these agents for human immunodeficiency virus-1 treatment.

Dolutegravir plasma concentrations according to companion antiretroviral drug: unwanted drug interaction or desirable boosting effect?

BACKGROUND: Studies in healthy volunteers have shown that the recently approved HIV integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has limited drug-to-drug interaction profile. Here we carried out a pharmacokinetic survey in HIV-infected patients given dolutegravir as part of their antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations were measured in 78 HIV-infected patients given the drug in combination with a protease inhibitor, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or abacavir/lamivudine. Drug concentrations were assessed by high performance liquid chromatography method with UV-detection. RESULTS: All patients were given dolutegravir at 50 mg once daily, with median trough drug concentrations of 1,096 (664-2,356) ng/ml (interindividual coefficient of variation: 85.3%). Patients given dolutegravir with atazanavir had significantly higher drug concentrations compared with those given darunavir, rilpivirine or abacavir/lamivudine (2,399 [1,929-4,070] versus 738 [552-1,048], 603 [432-1,373] or 1,045 [856-1,115] ng/ml; P<0.001 for all comparisons). By multivariate analyses, only companion antiretroviral drug resulted in significant association with dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir coadministration significantly inhibited dolutegravir metabolism, ultimately resulting in a two- to fourfold increase in drug disposition compared with other antiretroviral drugs. This boosting effect of atazanavir could be used to optimize dolutegravir dosing in particular clinical settings.

Atazanavir increases the plasma concentrations of 1200 mg raltegravir dose.

Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor currently marketed at a dose of 400 mg twice-daily (b.i.d.). Raltegravir 1200 mg once-daily (q.d.) (investigational q.d. formulation of 2 × 600 mg tablets; q.d. RAL) was found to be generally well tolerated and non-inferior to the marketed 400 mg b.i.d. dose at 48 weeks in a phase 3 trial. Since raltegravir is eliminated mainly by metabolism via a uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1-mediated glucuronidation pathway, co-administration of UGT1A1 inhibitors may increase the plasma levels of q.d. RAL. To assess this potential, the drug interaction of 1200 mg raltegravir using atazanavir, a known UGT1A1 inhibitor, was studied. An open-label, randomized, 2-period, fixed-sequence phase 1 study was performed in adult healthy male and female (non-childbearing potential) subjects ≥ 19 and ≤ 55 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5 and ≤ 32.0 kg/m2 . Subjects (n = 14) received a single oral dose of 1200 mg raltegravir in period 1. After a washout period of at least 7 days, the subjects received oral doses of 400 mg atazanavir q.d. for 9 consecutive days, with a single oral dose of 1200 mg raltegravir co-administered on day 7 of period 2. Serial blood samples were collected for 72 h following raltegravir dosing and analysed using a validated bioanalytical method to quantify raltegravir plasma concentrations. Co-administration with atazanavir yielded GMRs (90% CIs) for raltegravir AUC0-∞ , Cmax and C24 of 1.67 (1.34, 2.10), 1.16 (1.01, 1.33) and 1.26 (1.08, 1.46), respectively. There was no effect of raltegravir on serum total bilirubin. In contrast, atazanavir increased the mean bilirubin by up to 200%, an effect that was preserved in the atazanavir/raltegravir treatment group. Administration of single q.d. RAL alone and co-administered with multiple oral doses of atazanavir were generally well tolerated in healthy subjects. The results show that atazanavir increased the PK exposure of raltegravir; therefore, co-administration of atazanavir with raltegravir q.d. is not recommended. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Effect of metal-cation antacids on the pharmacokinetics of 1200 mg raltegravir.

OBJECTIVES: Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor currently marketed at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (BID). Raltegravir for once-daily regimen (QD) at a dose of 1200 mg is under development. The effect of calcium carbonate and magnesium/aluminium hydroxide antacids on the pharmacokinetics of a 1200 mg dose of raltegravir was assessed in this study. METHODS: An open-label, four-period, four-treatment, fixed-sequence study in 20 HIV-infected patients was performed. Patients needed to be on raltegravir as part of a stable treatment regimen for HIV, and upon entry into the trial received 5 days of 1200 mg raltegravir as pretreatment, before they entered the four-period study: 1200 mg of raltegravir alone (period 1), calcium carbonate antacid as TUMS® Ultra Strength (US) 1000 and 1200 mg raltegravir given concomitantly (Period 2), magnesium/aluminium hydroxide antacid as 20 ml MAALOX® Maximum Strength substitute MS given 12 h after administration of 1200 mg raltegravir (period 3), and calcium carbonate antacid as TUMS® US 1000 given 12 h after administration of 1200 mg raltegravir (period 4). Patients received their dose of 1200 mg QD raltegravir during the intervals between periods to re-establish steady state. AUC0-24 , C24 , Cmax and Tmax were calculated from the individual plasma concentrations of 1200 mg QD raltegravir after administration alone or with a calcium carbonate antacid or with a staggered dose of a calcium carbonate antacid or magnesium/aluminium hydroxide antacid. Adverse events, in addition to laboratory safety tests (haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis), 12-lead electrocardiograms and vital signs were assessed. KEY FINDINGS: All treatments were well tolerated in the study. Metal-cation antacids variably affected the pharmacokinetics of 1200 mg QD raltegravir. When calcium carbonate antacid was given with 1200 mg raltegravir concomitantly, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and its associated 90% confidence interval (90% CI) for AUC0-24 , Cmax and C24 h were 0.28 (0.24, 0.32), 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) and 0.52 (0.45, 0.61), respectively. When calcium carbonate antacid and magnesium/aluminium hydroxide were given 12 h after raltegravir 1200 mg QD dosing, the GMR (90% CI) values for AUC0-24 and Cmax were 0.90 (0.80, 1.03), 0.98 (0.81, 1.17), and 0.86 (0.73, 1.03), 0.86 (0.65, 1.15), respectively. However, significant reduction in the trough concentrations of raltegravir was observed: C24 h 0.43 (0.36, 0.51) in the presence of calcium carbonate antacids and 0.42 (0.34, 0.52) in presence of magnesium/aluminium hydroxide, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of metal-cation antacids with 1200 mg QD raltegravir is not recommended.

No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between dolutegravir and daclatasvir in healthy adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: Daclatasvir (DCV) is an NS5A replication complex inhibitor recently approved for chronic hepatitis C virus treatment. METHODS: To assess drug interactions between the HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) and DCV, subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 sequences in an open-label, 3-period, crossover study. Subjects received either DTG 50 mg once daily or DCV 60 mg once daily for 5 days in periods 1 and 2 and DTG 50 mg plus DCV 60 mg once daily for 5 days in period 3, with no washout between periods 2 and 3. Between periods 1 and 2, there was a washout period of at least 7 days. RESULTS: The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90 % confidence intervals) of DCV area under the concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (AUC0-τ), maximum observed concentration (Cmax), and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cτ) were 0.978 (0.831-1.15), 1.03 (0.843-1.25), and 1.06 (0.876-1.29), respectively, when DCV was administered with DTG compared with DCV alone. Compared with DTG alone, coadministration of DTG with DCV increased DTG AUC0-τ, Cmax, and Cτ by approximately 33, 29, and 45 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DCV plasma exposure was not meaningfully affected by DTG. Coadministration of DTG with DCV resulted in slight increases in DTG AUC0-τ, Cmax, and Cτ. Accumulated safety and tolerability data in humans receiving DTG to date suggests this effect is not considered clinically significant. DTG and DCV can be coadministered without dose adjustment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on March 6, 2014 with ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT02082808 and as Study ID: 201102 on the ViiV Clinical Study Registry.

The development and application of a novel LC-MS/MS method for the measurement of Dolutegravir, Elvitegravir and Cobicistat in human plasma.

Dolutegravir and Elvitegravir belongs to a class of integrase inhibitors which has recently been approved by the FDA for the treatment of HIV-infection. Elvitegravir and its co-administered booster drug, Cobicistat, has shown the potential to be a candidate for a one pill once a day regimen and is currently a component of many clinical trials. A sensitive LC-MS/MS method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of these three drugs in human plasma. A liquid- liquid extraction was used as a sample preparation technique using 100µL of plasma. The method was validated from 10 to 4000ng/mL for Dolutegravir, Elvitegravir and Cobicistat. Chromatography was performed on XBridge C18 2.1mm×50mm column, using an 80:20 methanol/water mobile phase containing 0.1% formic acid on a gradient program. This method was successfully applied for ongoing clinical trials.

Brief Report: High Peak Level of Plasma Raltegravir Concentration in Patients With ABCB1 and ABCG2 Genetic Variants.

Raltegravir was recently identified to be a substrate of ATP-binding cassette transporter B1 (ABCB1) and G2 (ABCG2), which are efflux transporters and expressed in the intestines. We analyzed the relations between plasma raltegravir concentrations and single nucleotide polymorphism of ABCB1 and ABCG2 genes. The peak plasma concentration of raltegravir was significantly higher in the patients with ABCB1 4036 AG/GG and ABCG2 421 CA/AA than in other genotype holders (P = 0.0052), though no difference was identified in trough raltegravir concentrations, which may be explained by reduced expression of efflux transporters in intestine by these genetic variants.

Effect of carbamazepine on dolutegravir pharmacokinetics and dosing recommendation.

PURPOSE: Dolutegravir (DTG) is primarily metabolized by UGT1A1 with CYP3A as a minor route. Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a potent inducer of these enzymes; thus, the effect of oral extended-release CBZ on DTG pharmacokinetics (PK) was evaluated to provide dose recommendation when co-administered. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence, crossover study in healthy adults. Subjects received three treatments: DTG 50 mg every 24 h (q24h) × 5 days in period 1, followed by CBZ 100 mg every 12 h (q12h) × 3 days, then 200 mg q12h × 3 days, then 300 mg q12h × 10 days in period 2, and DTG 50 mg q24h + CBZ 300 mg q12h × 5 days in period 3. No washout intervals occurred. Each dose was administered with a moderate-fat meal. Serial PK samples for DTG were collected on day 5 of periods 1 and 3. Plasma DTG PK parameters were determined with non-compartmental analysis. Geometric least-squares mean ratios (GMRs) and 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) were generated by the mixed-effect model for within-subject treatment comparisons. Safety assessments were performed throughout the study. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects enrolled; 14 completed the study. CBZ significantly reduced DTG exposure: GMRs (90 % CI) for DTG + CBZ versus DTG alone were 0.51 (0.48-0.549), 0.67 (0.61-0.73), and 0.27 (0.24-0.31) for area under the curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (AUC(0-τ)), maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), and plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cτ), respectively. DTG alone and co-administered with CBZ was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Integrase strand transfer inhibitor-naive subjects taking CBZ should receive DTG 50 mg twice daily versus once daily, as is recommended with other potent UGT1A/CYP3A inducers. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01967771.

Disposition and metabolism of cabotegravir: a comparison of biotransformation and excretion between different species and routes of administration in humans.

1. Cabotegravir [(3S,11aR)-N-[(2,4-difluorophenyl)methyl]-6-hydroxy-3-methyl-5,7-dioxo-2,3,5,7,11,11a-hexahydro[1,3]oxazolo[3,2-a]pyrido[1,2-d]pyrazine-8-carboxamide] is an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor under development as a tablet for both oral lead-in therapy and long-acting (LA) injectable for intramuscular dosing. 2. Metabolism, pharmacokinetics and excretion were investigated in healthy human subjects who received either a single oral dose (28.2 mg) of [(14)C]cabotegravir in a mass balance study, or LA formulations of unlabeled cabotegravir (200-800 mg), intramuscularly or subcutaneously, in a separate study. Metabolism, distribution and excretion of [(14)C]cabotegravir were also investigated in mice, rats and monkeys. 3. Recovery of radioactivity in humans represented a mean total of 85.3% of the dose, including 26.8% in the urine. The mean apparent terminal phase half-life was similar for both cabotegravir and radioactivity, 39 h compared to 41 h. 4. Following oral, intramuscular and subcutaneous administration, cabotegravir was the major component in plasma and the glucuronic acid conjugate (M1) represented the predominant component in urine. Cabotegravir was present in bile along with its major metabolite (M1). 5. The primary metabolite of [(14)C]cabotegravir in mouse, rat and monkey was the same as that in human. In vitro phenotyping experiments demonstrated that cabotegravir was metabolized by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and UGT1A9.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Boosted-Elvitegravir in HIV-Infected Patients.

Elvitegravir (EVG) is an HIV strand transfer integrase inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV infection as a part of antiretroviral regimens containing cobicistat (COBI) or ritonavir (RTV) as a booster. The population pharmacokinetics of EVG in treatment-naive and -experienced HIV patients was determined, and the effects of demographic, biometric, and formulation covariates on EVG pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated. Data from 31 clinical studies (25 in healthy subjects, 6 phase 1b to phase 3 in HIV-1-infected patients) with COBI-boosted EVG studies (as EVG/co or EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF single-tablet regimen) or RTV-boosted EVG studies (EVG/r) were analyzed using NONMEM. The effect of the covariates age, sex, race, health status (healthy volunteers vs HIV patients), weight, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), creatinine clearance (estimated GFR), and formulation were evaluated. EVG PK, with COBI or RTV, was described by a 2-compartment model, with first-order absorption and elimination and an absorption lag time. A statistically significant, but not clinically relevant, effect of BSA on EVG clearance (CL) was observed. Coadministration of atazanavir or lopinavir with EVG/r had an effect on EVG CL consistent with the known interaction with these agents. No other covariate had a meaningful effect on EVG PK. EVG PK was well described in a population PK model with HIV-infected patients, with low PK variability and no relevant effect of demographic or biometric covariates.

Population pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in HIV-infected treatment-naive patients.

AIM: Dolutegravir is the newest integrase inhibitor approved for HIV treatment and has demonstrated potent antiviral activity in patient populations with a broad range of treatment experience. This analysis aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in treatment-naive patients and to evaluate the influence of patient covariates. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using a non-linear mixed effect modelling approach based on data from 563 HIV-infected, treatment-naive adult patients in three phase 2/3 trials who received dolutegravir (ranging from 10-50 mg once daily) alone or in combination with abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir were adequately described by a linear one compartment model with first order absorption, absorption lag time and first order elimination. Population estimates for apparent clearance, apparent volume of distribution, absorption rate constant and absorption lag time were 0.901 l h(-1) , 17.4 l, 2.24 h(-1) , and 0.263 h, respectively. Weight, smoking status, age and total bilirubin were predictors of clearance, weight was a predictor of volume of distribution and gender was a predictor of bioavailability. However, the magnitude of the effects of these covariates on steady-state dolutegravir plasma exposure was relatively small (<32%) and was not considered clinically significant. Race/ethnicity, HBV/HCV co-infection, CDC classification, albumin, creatinine clearance, alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase did not influence the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A population model that adequately characterizes dolutegravir pharmacokinetics has been developed. No dolutegravir dose adjustment by patient covariates is necessary in HIV-infected treatment-naive patients.

Raltegravir pharmacokinetics during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of raltegravir in HIV-infected women during pregnancy and postpartum. METHODS: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials 1026s is an ongoing prospective study of antiretroviral PK during pregnancy (NCT00042289). Women receiving 400 mg raltegravir twice daily in combination antiretroviral therapy had intensive steady-state 12-hour PK profiles performed during pregnancy and at 6- to 12-week postpartum. Targets were trough concentration above 0.035 µg/mL, the estimated 10th percentile in nonpregnant historical controls. RESULTS: Median raltegravir area under the curve was 6.6 µg·h/mL for second trimester (n = 16), 5.4 µg·h/mL for third trimester (n = 41), and 11.6 µg·h/mL postpartum (n = 38) (P = 0.03 postpartum vs second trimester, P = 0.001 pp vs third trimester). Trough concentrations were above the target in 69%, 80%, and 79% of second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum subjects, respectively, with wide variability (<0.010-0.917 µg/mL), and no significant difference between third trimester and postpartum trough concentrations was detected. The median ratio of cord blood/maternal raltegravir concentrations was 1.5. HIV RNA levels were <400 copies per milliliter in 92% of women at delivery. Adverse events included elevated liver transaminases in 1 woman and vomiting in 1. All infants with known status are HIV uninfected. CONCLUSIONS: Median raltegravir area under the curve was reduced by approximately 50% during pregnancy; trough concentrations were frequently below target both during late pregnancy and postpartum. Raltegravir readily crossed the placenta. High rates of viral suppression at delivery and the lack of a clear relationship between raltegravir concentration and virologic effect in nonpregnant adults suggest that despite the decreased exposure during pregnancy, a higher dose is not necessary.