RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic intestinal failure (CIF) is a heterogeneous disease that affects pediatric and adult populations worldwide and requires complex multidisciplinary management. In recent years, many advances in intravenous supplementation support, surgical techniques, pharmacological management, and intestinal transplants have been published. Based on these advances, international societies have published multiple recommendations and guidelines for the management of these patients. The purpose of this paper is to show the differences that currently exist between the recommendations (ideal life) and the experiences published by different programs around the world. METHODS: A review of the literature in PubMed from 1980 to 2024 was carried out using the following terms: intestinal failure, CIF, home parenteral nutrition, short bowel syndrome, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, intestinal transplant, enterohormones, and glucagon-like peptide-2. CONCLUSIONS: There is a difference between what is recommended in the guidelines and consensus and what is applied in real life. Most of the world's countries are not able to offer all of the steps needed to treat this pathology. The development of cooperative networks between countries is necessary to ensure access to comprehensive treatment for most patients on all continents, but especially in low-income countries.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Intestinal , Nutrição Parenteral no Domicílio , Humanos , Doença Crônica , Adulto , Insuficiência Intestinal/terapia , Síndrome do Intestino Curto/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pseudo-Obstrução Intestinal/terapia , Peptídeo 2 Semelhante ao GlucagonAssuntos
Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Síndrome do Intestino Curto/enfermagem , Insuficiência Intestinal/enfermagem , Insuficiência Intestinal/reabilitação , Insuficiência Intestinal/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Enfermagem Pediátrica/tendências , Transferência de PacientesAssuntos
Cobre/deficiência , Insuficiência Intestinal/história , Insuficiência Intestinal/terapia , Soluções de Nutrição Parenteral/história , Nutrição Parenteral/história , Criança , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Insuficiência Intestinal/complicações , Nutrição Parenteral/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Parenteral/métodos , Soluções de Nutrição Parenteral/química , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare extrahepatic adverse events during fish oil lipid emulsion (FOLE) or soybean oil lipid emulsion (SOLE) treatment in children with intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD). STUDY DESIGN: In this multicenter integrated analysis, bleeding, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), infections, and signs of lipid emulsion intolerance were compared between FOLE recipients (1 g/kg/d) (n = 189) and historical controls who received SOLE (≤3 g/kg/d) (n = 73). RESULTS: When compared with SOLE recipients, FOLE recipients had a lower gestational age (30.5 vs 33.0 weeks; P = .0350) and higher baseline direct bilirubin (DB) (5.8 vs 3.0 mg/dL; P < .0001). FOLE recipients had a decreased incidence of bleeding (P < .0001), BPD (P < .001), ROP (P < .0156), bacterial and fungal infections (P < .0001), and lipid intolerance signs (P < .02 for all). Patients with bleeding vs patients without bleeding had higher baseline DB; the ORs for baseline DB (by mg/dL) and treatment (FOLE vs SOLE) were 1.20 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.31; P ≤ .0001) and 0.22 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.46; P ≤ .0001), respectively. In preterm infants, a higher BPD (P < .0001) and ROP incidence (P = .0071) was observed in SOLE recipients vs FOLE recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Children with IFALD who received FOLE had fewer extrahepatic adverse events, including a decreased incidence of bleeding, preterm comorbidities, and lipid intolerance signs compared with children with IFALD who received SOLE. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00910104 and NCT00738101.