C-factor: a summary measure for systemic arterial calcifications.

BACKGROUND: Arterial calcification, the hallmark of arteriosclerosis, has a widespread distribution in the human body with only moderate correlation among sites. Hitherto, a single measure capturing the systemic burden of arterial calcification was lacking. In this paper, we propose the C-factor as an overall measure of calcification burden. METHODS: To quantify calcification in the coronary arteries, aortic arch, extra- and intracranial carotid arteries, and vertebrobasilar arteries, 2384 Rotterdam Study participants underwent cardiac and extra-cardiac non-enhanced CT. We performed principal component analyses on the calcification volumes of all twenty-six possible combinations of these vessel beds. Each analysis' first principal component represents the C-factor. Subsequently, we determined the correlation between the C-factor derived from all vessel beds and the other C-factors with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses. Finally, we examined the association of the C-factor and calcification in the separate vessel beds with cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular, and overall mortality using Cox-regression analyses. RESULTS: The ICCs ranged from 0.80 to 0.99. Larger calcification volumes and a higher C-factor were all individually associated with higher risk of cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular, and overall mortality. When included simultaneously in a model, the C-factor was still associated with all three mortality types (adjusted hazard ratio per standard deviation increase (HR) > 1.52), whereas associations of the separate vessel beds with mortality attenuated substantially (HR < 1.26). CONCLUSIONS: The C-factor summarizes the systemic component of arterial calcification on an individual level and appears robust among different combinations of vessel beds. Importantly, when mutually adjusted, the C-factor retains its strength of association with mortality while the site-specific associations attenuate.

Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: Outcomes, influencing factors and imaging characteristics from the Tama-REgistry of acute thrombectomy (TREAT) study.

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) remains unknown. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endovascular treatment for ABAO. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients with ABAO who underwent MT using modern stent retrievers and an aspiration device between January 2015 and March 2019 at 12 comprehensive stroke centers. Functional outcomes and 90-day mortality rates were analyzed as primary outcomes. Factors influencing outcomes were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Relationships between outcome and affected area of infarction on arrival were also analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included. Good outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2) was achieved in 25/73 patients (34.2%) and the all-cause 90-day mortality rate was 23.3% (17/73). Successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction grade 2b and 3) was achieved in 70/73 patients (95.9%). In univariate analyses, age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS) differed significantly between good and poor functional outcome groups. Age and pc-ASPECTS were significantly associated with functional outcomes in the logistic regression model. Positive findings for the midbrain on diffusion-weighted imaging on pc-ASPECTS and brainstem score were significantly associated with poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: MT with modern devices for ABAO resulted in highly successful recanalization and good outcomes. A positive finding for the midbrain on initial imaging might predict poor outcomes. Further studies are required to confirm our results.

Impact of the Perioperative Blood Pressure on Clinical Outcome after Thrombectomy in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion.

AIM: Optimal blood pressure (BP) management in vertebrobasilar circulation stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy remains undetermined. We aimed to evaluate the impact of perioperative BP on clinical outcome after MT in acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients hospitalized with acute basilar artery occlusion administered endovascular treatment within 24 h from January 2012 to July 2018 in Beijing Tiantan Hospital. BP was measured at regular intervals during the first 24 h after stroke onset, during and after thrombectomy. The clinical outcomes assessed at 3-month follow up were functional independence (mRS score of 0-2) and mortality (mRS score of 6). RESULTS: Of the 187 treated patients, 157 were male; patient ages were 60±10 years. The median NIHSS on admission was 22. Totally in 179 patients had complete BP level assessment. In these individuals, univariate analysis revealed significant associations of postoperative Max SBP and Max MAP with mortality (all P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis also demonstrated that postoperative Max SBP (OR=0.964, 95% CI 0.941 to 0.987, P < 0.003) and Max MAP (OR=0.942, 95% CI 0.907 to 0.979, P < 0.002) were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In acute BAO patients administered thrombectomy, Max SBP between 120 and 160 mmHg may be associated with better outcome, with a trend of reduced risk of mortality.

Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Stenosis: A 10-Year Single Centre Experience Using Balloon-Expandable Coronary Artery Stents.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic intracranial vertebro-basilar stenoses (SIVBS) are associated with high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, even in patients receiving the best medical treatment. Although medical treatment is still the standard of care, non-responding patients may require endovascular treatment; balloon-mounted coronary stents (BMCS) could be successfully employed. This study aims to retrospectively analyze our high volume Interventional Neurovascular center ten-year experience in the off-label use of BMCS for the treatment of SIVBS, in order to assess its feasibility and safety. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with SIVBS treated with BMCS in the last ten years in our center. Data collected included patient demographics, stenosis location and characteristics, early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) stroke and death rates, pre-symptomatic and post-treatment modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. RESULTS: 42 patients (35 males, average age 65,7 ± 10,7, range 37-85) with SIVBS were treated with BMCS. Thirty-four (80,9%) patients were symptomatic despite ongoing best medical therapy; eight (19,1%) patients were treated in emergency for large vessel occlusion, due to an underlying stenosis. BMCSs were successfully deployed in all cases. The incidence of stroke and death at one month was 7,1% (3/42). The incidence of TIA, stroke and death at long-term follow-up (average time of 3 years) was 14,3% (4,7 per 100 person-years). At long-term follow-up, mRS improved in 82% of patients who underwent elective treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the off-label use of BMCS in the endovascular treatment of SIVBS resistant to medical treatment is feasible and safe.

Outcome and recanalization rate of tandem basilar artery occlusion treated by mechanical thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Tandem basilar artery occlusions (tBAO) are defined as concomitant basilar artery and extracranial dominant vertebral artery occlusions. The prognosis of such tBAO treated by mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been scantly reported. The purpose of our study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of MT for patients with tBAO compared to those with non-tandem basilar artery occlusions (ntBAO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a database of patients who underwent MT at two academic centres. All patients treated for BAO were retrieved. Patients with tBAO, defined as a concomitant BAO and extracranial vertebral artery (VA) occlusion or severe stenosis ≥70% (V1 or proximal V2 segment) were compared with patients with ntBAO. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients with tBAO and 74 patients with ntBAO were enrolled. Successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score ≥2b) was obtained in 73.3% versus 90.5% (OR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.07-1.15), good clinical outcome (3-months modified Rankin scale ≤2) was reached by 26.7% versus 32.4% (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.24-2.63) and mortality at 3-months was 46.7% versus 31% (OR = 1.94; 95%CI: 0.63-6) of patients with tBAO versus ntBAO, respectively. Two patients (13.3%) with tBAO and three (4%) with ntBAO had symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (OR = 3.64; 95% CI: 0.55-24). CONCLUSION: Mechanical thrombectomy for patients with tandem basilar artery occlusion tends to be associated with lower rates of successful reperfusion and good clinical outcome, and higher rate of mortality. Larger multicentre studies are warranted to better precise the proper selection and management of such patients.

Predictors of Very Poor Outcome after Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion.

Prognosis for patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains poor. Successful revascularization is a main predictor of favorable clinical outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy for BAO. However, even if mechanical thrombectomy is successful, some patients have a poor clinical outcome, including vegetative state and mortality. This study investigated the factors that are predictive of extremely poor clinical outcomes despite successful revascularization after mechanical thrombectomy for BAO. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke due to BAO and who were successfully treated with mechanical thrombectomy. A very poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 5 or 6 at 3 months after treatment. The associations between the clinical, imaging, procedural factors, and poor outcome were evaluated. Using univariate analyses, there were significant differences in the preoperative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (22.0 ± 9.0 vs. 30.5 ± 4.3, p <0.001), and infarct volume in brain stem (0.11 ± 0.19 cc vs. 2.55 ± 1.56 cc, p <0.001) between the control and very poor outcome groups. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under ROC curve of infarct volume in brain stem was 0.891 to predict very poor outcome. Preoperative infarct volume in brain stem is strong predictor for very poor outcome. The infarct volume in brain stem is useful for deciding treatment indications.

Distal arterial occlusions in patients with mild strokes - is endovascular therapy superior to thrombolysis alone?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with mild stroke syndromes is unclear, especially in distal vessel occlusions. METHODS: We analysed in our stroke database (HeiReKa) between 2002 and April 2019 safety and efficacy of EVT compared to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with occlusions distal to the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery and the top of the basilar artery who presented with a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) below 6. Excellent (good) outcome was defined as modified rankin scale (mRS) 0-1 (0-2) or return to baseline mRS (good) after 3 months. Safety endpoints were mortality after 3 months and intracranial hemorrhage according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC). RESULTS: Of 4167 patients 94 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four patients were allocated to the IVT group and 30 to the EVT group of which 15 also received IVT; three patients (4.6%) in the IVT group received rescue EVT. Baseline characteristics did not differ but more M2 occlusions were found in the EVT group (93.3% vs. 64.1%, p = 0.02). Intracranial bleeding occurred more often in EVT patients (HBC class 2: 13.3% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.01). Excellent and good outcome were not significantly different (75% vs. 70%, p = 0.65 and 87.5% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.14). Mortality was significantly lower in IVT patients (1.6% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Rates of excellent and good outcome after IVT or EVT were almost similar, but safety parameters were increased after EVT. EVT may be considered in selected patients after careful risk/benefit analysis.

Surgical Treatment of Vertebral Artery Stenosis: An Overlooked Surgery with Low Morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral artery (VA) stenosis as a cause of ischemic events and its surgical treatment is an overlooked subject. After reporting our initial results, the results of VA stenosis operations and the follow-up studies are analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study includes 43 symptomatic proximal VA stenosis patients between September 2012 and March 2019. The demographics and clinical data were obtained from the hospital records. Doppler ultrasonography and computed tomography angiography were used to establish the diagnosis and for follow-up. The surgical procedures were as follows: VA transposition in 30 (69.8%), VA bypass 8 (18.6%), saphenous vein interposition in VA in 4 (9.3%), and decompression of kinking in 1 (2.3%) patient. Eleven patients (25.5%) had concomitant carotid surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival and patency rates. RESULTS: Most common symptoms were vertigo and loss of balance in 38 (88.4%) and 14 (32.6%) patients, respectively. Twenty-five patients were males (58.1%), and the average age was 64.6 ± 9.8 (50-90) years. The 30-day death, 30-day stroke, and 30-day death/stroke rates were 2.3%, 4.7%, and 7%, respectively. Ten patients (23.3%) had morbidities which were related to the intervention. Horner syndrome was found in 5 (11.6%) patients, and facial nerve injury was found in one (2.3%) patient. Three (7.1%) patients died during the follow-up period, and overall survival of the patients at 3 years was 91.4% ± 5.8%. Two (4.7%) patients had cerebrovascular events (CVEs) occurred during the follow-up. One- and three-year CVE-free survivals were 97.1% ± 2.9% and 90.1% ± 7.2%, respectively. Two patients (5.4%) had restenosis. One- and three-year patency of VA after procedure was 89.1% ± 7.4%. Thirty-seven (86%) patients had complete recovery of symptoms after surgery; 5 patients (11.6%) kept their preoperative symptoms in different levels. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral artery surgery can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates. Restenosis-free, CVE-free, and overall survival rates are satisfactory.

Two- to five-year follow-up of 78 patients after treatment with the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow-diverter stents are well-established for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device differs from other flow-diverter stents by its dual-layer design and has proved equality to other devices in numerous short-term surveys. However, follow-up data covering substantially more than one year are still limited for this device. We present our long-term experience with Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients harboring distal internal carotid artery (91%) or vertebrobasilar (9%) cerebral aneurysms treated with Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device with or without adjunctive coiling met the inclusion criteria. All cases were evaluated for aneurysm occlusion (according to Modified Raymond Roy Classification, MRRC), for flow-diverter stents patency and configuration and for procedure- and device-related morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Mean follow-up interval was 36.9 ± 9.5 months (<30 months: n = 18; 31-42 months: n = 31; >42 months: n = 24). Total and subtotal aneurysm occlusion after six months was assessed in 92.0% (MRRC1 = 77.3%, MRRC2 = 14.7%, MRRC3a =2.7%, MRRC3b = 4.1%) and increased to 95.9% (MRRC1 = 90.5%, MRRC2 = 5.4%, MRRC3a = 2.7%). There was one case of aneurysm growth requiring early re-treatment. Procedure-related morbidity was observed in three cases (3.8%; one transient hemiparesis, one suspected foreign-body reaction, and one micro-wire perforation). There was no procedure- or device-related mortality. In-stent stenosis due to intimal hyperplasia was observed in two cases and fish-mouthing in three cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our long-term data covering two to five years after flow diversion confirm that Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device is a safe and effective device for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with progressive high aneurysm occlusion rates; recurrence rates were very low. Overall device-related morbidity was low and was not observed later than six months after intervention.

Basilar artery thrombectomy: assessment of outcome and identification of prognostic factors.

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), thanks to large vessel occlusion (LVO), especially in case of anterior cerebral artery with many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) every year. On the other hand, there is a limited number of basilar artery occlusion (BAO)-related studies which have been conducted. The fact prompts our range of case studies, which furnish BAO understanding with our experience, results and some prognosis factors of MT. This retrospective and single-center study was conducted on 22 patients who were diagnosed with BAO and underwent the treatment of MT from October 2012 to January 2018. Clinical feature such as radiological imaging, procedure complications, and intracranial hemorrhage were all documented and evaluated. All the studies' results based on performance using modified Rankin scale score (mRS) and mortality at 90 days. The results from these BAO patients study indicated that the posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early CT Score (pcASPECTS) recorded before the intervention was 7.7 ± 1.6, while the admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 17.5 ± 5.4. 15/22 cases achieved successful recanalization (TICI, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale, of 2b-3), accounting for 68.2%. The results highlighted 50% of the favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) occupying 11 out of 22 patients in total and the overall mortality was 36.4%. The intracranial hemorrhagic complication was detected in three cases (13.6%). Placing in juxtaposition the poor-outcome group and the favorable-outcome group, we could witness statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) suggesting both good baseline image (pc-ASPECTS ≥ 7) and recanalization (TICI 2b-3) were two good prognosis factors. Our case series showed that MT would be an effective and feasible treatment for BAO. The pre-procedural pcASPECTS ≥ 7 and post-procedural good recanalization (TICI 2b-3) were two important prognosis factors for predicting good clinical outcome.

Long-term mortality, disability and stroke recurrence in patients with basilar artery occlusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The long-term outcomes and stroke recurrence after basilar artery occlusion (BAO) are largely unknown. We aimed to assess these variables in a comparatively large series of consecutive patients. METHODS: Adults with acute BAO were retrospectively identified from 1976 to 2011. Post-discharge records were reviewed to assess for stroke recurrences, mortality and disability. Exploratory analysis of survival was carried out using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Factors associated with survival time were determined using Cox models. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients (34% female, median age 72 [interquartile range (IQR), 60-79] years) with a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 11 (IQR, 6-27) were included. Twenty-nine patients (34%) died during the initial hospitalization. Median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge among survivors was 4 (IQR, 2.5-5.5). At 1 and 5 years, 70% of survivors ad a mRS ≤3. Seventeen patients had recurrent strokes during the hospitalization and 12 patients had 19 recurrent strokes after discharge. The median survival time was 52 days (IQR, 6-1846). Older age per decade on admission [adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.66, P = 0.02] and a higher mRS at discharge (aHR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.72-7.39, P < 0.0001) were associated with mortality. Patients who were not treated with any reperfusion therapy had a trend towards reduced mortality (aHR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.14-1.08, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Survivors from BAO had severe short-term functional disability. Most deaths and stroke recurrences occurred within the first year following the initial event. The risk of death was higher in older and more disabled survivors. However, favorable long-term recovery was possible.

Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (BEST): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous randomised trials have shown an overwhelming benefit of mechanical thrombectomy for treating patients with stroke caused by large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation. Whether endovascular treatment is beneficial for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acute strokes due to vertebrobasilar artery occlusion. METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial, with blinded outcome assessment of thrombectomy in patients presenting within 8 h of vertebrobasilar occlusion at 28 centres in China. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to endovascular therapy plus standard medical therapy (intervention group) or standard medical therapy alone (control group). The randomisation sequence was computer-generated and stratified by participating centres. Allocation concealment was implemented by use of sealed envelopes. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 3 or lower (indicating ability to walk unassisted) at 90 days, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary safety outcome was mortality at 90 days. Secondary safety endpoints included the rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, device-related complications, and other severe adverse events. The BEST trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02441556. FINDINGS: Between April 27, 2015, and Sept 27, 2017, we assessed 288 patients for eligibility. The trial was terminated early after 131 patients had been randomly assigned (66 patients to the intervention group and 65 to the control group) because of high crossover rate and poor recruitment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was no evidence of a difference in the proportion of participants with mRS 0-3 at 90 days according to treatment (28 [42%] of 66 patients in the intervention group vs 21 [32%] of 65 in the control group; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1·74, 95% CI 0·81-3·74). Secondary prespecified analyses of the primary outcome, done to assess the effect of crossovers, showed higher rates of mRS 0-3 at 90 days in patients who actually received the intervention compared with those who received standard medical therapy alone in both per-protocol (28 [44%] of 63 patients with intervention vs 13 [25%] of 51 with standard therapy; adjusted OR 2·90, 95% CI 1·20-7·03) and as-treated (36 [47%] of 77 patients with intervention vs 13 [24%] of 54 with standard therapy; 3·02, 1·31-7·00) populations. The 90-day mortality was similar between groups (22 [33%] of 66 patients in the intervention vs 25 [38%] of 65 in the control group; p=0·54) despite a numerically higher prevalence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in the intervention group. INTERPRETATION: There was no evidence of a difference in favourable outcomes of patients receiving endovascular therapy compared with those receiving standard medical therapy alone. Results might have been confounded by loss of equipoise over the course of the trial, resulting in poor adherence to the assigned study treatment and a reduced sample size due to the early termination of the study. FUNDING: Jiangsu Provincial Special Program of Medical Science.

Acute Stroke Treatment in Patients with Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Single-Center Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO) represents 1-4% of all ischemic strokes. BAO results in strokes associated with a high risk of a poor functional outcome and, in 86-95% of the untreated cases, it results in death because of the vital cerebral structures involved. Diagnosis can be delayed because of the variability in presenting symptoms, and acute treatment is often attempted even beyond 6 h from symptoms onset because of the high risk of a fatal prognosis. OBJECTIVE: In this observational study, we retrospectively analyzed patients with AIS due to BAO referred to the stroke center of the University Hospital of Messina. We aimed to assess prognostic factors and to evaluate the association between clinical outcome and posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS) and collateral status. METHOD: BAO was confirmed by cerebral computed tomography (CT) angiography or cerebral angiography. All patients underwent CT scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the pc-ASPECTS on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MR images and the Posterior Circulation Collateral Score (PC-CS) for every patient. Functional outcome was assessed at 3 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: The study population consisted of 27 patients; 16 males and 11 females. The mean age was 66 (±14) years. We observed a favorable outcome (mRS 0-3) in 40.7% of cases, 25.9% reached mRS 0-2, and 29.6% had a poor clinical outcome (mRS 4-5). Patient survival was 70.4%, whereas 8 patients died (29.6%). In 7 patients, pc-ASPECTS was ≥7. According to the PC-CS, 33.3% had moderate collaterals and 63.0% had good collateral status prior to receiving the treatment. Favorable outcome was significantly associated with age, NIHSS score at admission, pc-ASPECTS, hypercholesterolemia, and female sex but not with the other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found that younger age, low NIHSS score at admission, and high pc-ASPECTS, but not onset to treatment time, are associated with a favorable clinical outcome. Transferred patients did not have a significantly poorer outcome. These findings confirm that acute stroke treatment improves clinical outcome in BAO patients, in spite of a delayed diagnosis and an extended therapeutic window, considering lesion volume and localization in DWI MRI.

Stent Retriever Thrombectomy Potentially Increases the Recanalization Rate, Improves Clinical Outcome, and Decreases Mortality in Acute Basilar Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a devastating condition if untreated. The optimal treatment strategy, however, is unknown. Historically, interventional approaches have been favored over intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), although this is not supported by good evidence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and compare the results for treatment modalities of BAO, namely, IVT and interventional stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT). METHODS: Studies on IVT and SRT in BAO were systematically searched. Successful recanalization (TICI ≥2b), favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), mortality, and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) were the target parameters. Only studies with ≥15 patients were included. IVT prior to SRT was allowed. Studies were excluded (1) if >1 thrombectomy device was used in >50% of the patients and (2) when data on outcome or treatment could not be parsed (e.g. registries). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio estimation. Results are given as OR and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The χ2 test was used to compare the outcome parameters clinical outcome, recanalization, mortality, and SICH. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies (4 on IVT and 13 on SRT) with a total of 672 patients (IVT, n = 314; SRT, n = 358) were identified. Cumulatively, we found a highly significantly improved clinical outcome (43 vs. 31%, p = 0.004, OR [95% CI] = 1.66 [1.21, 2.76]), increased recanalization rate (88 vs. 60%, p < 0.00001, OR [95% CI] = 3.99 [2.73, 5.84]), and decreased mortality (26 vs. 41%, p = 0.0004, OR [95% CI] = 1.86 [1.33, 2.61]), as well as an equal rate of SICH (5 vs. 7%, p = 0.15, OR [95% CI] = 1.68 [0.82, 3.43]), in patients treated with SRT compared to those treated with IVT alone. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this meta-analysis suggest a possible superiority of SRT over IVT, pending positive results of randomized controlled trials. According to international recommendations, patients with BAO should preferentially be treated with SRT; if no contraindications exist, IVT should not be withheld.

Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis.

This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of stenting compared with standardized medical treatment in patients with moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS).Patients diagnosed with moderate to severe VAOS and indicated to undergo vertebral artery stenting were enrolled. Patients were divided into stenting group and standardized medical treatment group. All patients underwent transcranial Doppler (TCD) before and after treatment. Incidence of new cerebral infarction, transient ischemic attack (TIA), improvement of clinical symptoms, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score were observed.A total of 98 patients were enrolled. Vertebral artery stenting implant was accepted by 43 patients. Two weeks after treatment, the NIHSS score in the stenting group decreased significantly compared to that in the standardized medical treatment group. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in the stenting group at three months was significantly lower than that in the medical treatment group (P = .044). The extent of vascular stenosis in the stent group decreased significantly (76.5 ±â€Š10.0% vs. 13.7 ±â€Š5.9%, t = 35.878, P = .000). The adverse events occurred in 9 (16.4%) patients in the medical treatment group and 5 (11.6%) in the stenting group (P = .506). There was one case with new cerebral infarction in the stenting group, whereas the medical treatment group showed 1 case with TIA and three with new cerebral infarction during follow-up after 3 months. The peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility index (PI) of stenosis vertebral artery, and PSV of basilar artery were significantly higher in the stent group than those in the standardized medical group (P < .05).Stenting for VAOS, rather than standardized medical treatment, can effectively relieve vascular stenosis, alter vertebral-basilar artery hemodynamics, and improve neurological function, with low perioperative complications.

One-Year Risk of Recurrent Stroke and Death Associated with Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenosis and Occlusion in a Cohort of 10,515 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) stenosis or occlusion remains understudied. METHODS: Patients with diagnosis of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) who were noted to have VBA stenosis based on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging or catheter-based angiogram were selected from Taiwan Stroke Registry. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the hazards ratio (HR) of recurrent stroke and death within 1 year of index event in various groups based on severity of VBA stenosis (none to mild: 0-49%; moderate to severe: 50-99%: occlusion: 100%) after adjusting for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups at baseline evaluation. RESULTS: None to mild or moderate to severe VBA stenosis was diagnosed in 6972 (66%) and 3,137 (29.8%) among 10,515 patients, respectively, and occlusion was identified in 406 (3.8%) patients. Comparing with patients who showed none to mild stenosis of VBA, there was a significantly higher risk of recurrent stroke (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.45) among patients with moderate to severe VBA stenosis. There was a nonsignificantly higher risk of recurrent stroke (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.99-2.22) and significantly higher risk of death (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.72-2.83), among patients with VBA occlusion after adjustment of potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: VBA stenosis or occlusion was relatively prevalent among patients with TIA or ischemic stroke and associated with higher risk of recurrent stroke and death in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA who had large artery atherosclerosis.

Vertebral Artery Patency and Thrombectomy in Basilar Artery Occlusions.

Background and Purpose- Factors influencing recanalization success in basilar artery occlusions are largely unknown. Preliminary evidence has suggested that flow arrest in the vertebral artery contralateral to the catheter bearing vertebral artery may facilitate recanalization. The aim of this analysis was to assess the impact of anatomic variations and flow conditions on recanalization success in basilar artery occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Methods- Consecutive basilar artery occlusions treated with second-generation thrombectomy devices at a single-center were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline patients' characteristics, occlusion length, collateral circulation, underlying stenosis, incomplete occlusions, and patency of the vertebral arteries were analyzed with regards to recanalization success. Aplastic or hypoplastic vertebral artery contralateral to the catheter position was defined as contralateral low flow condition. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between anatomic variations and flow conditions in relation to complete recanalization and the modified Rankin Scale score while controlling for several potentially confounding variables. Clinical impact was evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale score of ≤3. Results- One hundred fifteen patients were included (mean age 71.5±12.8, m:f=2:1, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale =15, interquartile range =10-22). Complete recanalization was more often observed in patients with contralateral low flow conditions (80.6% versus 50.0%), which remained an independent predictor of complete recanalization in multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 5.81; 95% CI, 1.97-17.19). Patients with complete posterior recanalization had lower in-hospital mortality (16.4% versus 41.7%) and more often achieved modified Rankin Scale score of ≤3 (49.4% versus 8.3%), even after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 15.93; 95% CI, 1.42-179.00). Conclusions- Contralateral low flow condition (vertebral artery aplasia or hypoplasia) seems to be an independent factor for fewer distal emboli and complete recanalization in basilar artery occlusion patients treated by modern endovascular devices. Complete recanalization reflecting the absence of peri-interventional clot fragmentation brings clear clinical benefit. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the need for contralateral flow modulation or ipsilateral balloon guide catheter during posterior circulation thrombectomy in patients with bilaterally patent vertebral arteries.

Value of Posterior circulation ASPECTS and Pons-Midbrain Index on non-contrast CT and CT Angiography Source Images in patients with basilar artery occlusion recanalized after mechanical thrombectomy. / Valor de la escala ASPECTS de circulación posterior y del índice puente-mesencéfalo en imágenes de TC sin contraste y angiografía por TC en pacientes con oclusiones de la arteria basilar recanalizados tras trombectomía mecánica.

PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment with mechanical thrombectomy devices demonstrated high recanalization rates but functional outcome did not correlate with high rates of recanalization obtained. Patient selection prior to the endovascular treatment is very important in the final outcome of the patient. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic value of posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS) and Pons-Midbrain Index (PMI) scores in patients with Basilar Artery Occlusion (BAO) treated with successful angiographic recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study including 18 patients between 2008 and 2013 who had acute basilar artery occlusion managed with endovascular treatment within 24hours from symptoms onset and with successful angiographic recanalization. The patients were initially classified into two groups according to clinical outcome and mortality at 90 days. For analysis we also divided patients into groups based on pc-ASPECTS (≥8vs.<8) and PMI (≥3vs.<3) on non-contrast CT (NCCT) and CT Angiography Source Images (CTASI). Imaging data were correlated to clinical outcome and mortality rate. RESULTS: CTASI pc-ASPECTS, dichotomized at <8 versus≥8, was associated with a favorable outcome (RR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.3-5.2) and a reduced risk of death (RR: 6.5: 95% CI: 7.8-23.3). All patients that survived and were functionally independent had pc-ASPECTS score≥8. None of the 5 patients with CTASI pc-ASPECTS score less than 8 survived. CONCLUSION: PC-ASPECTS on CTASI is helpful for predicting functional outcome after BAO recanalization with endovascular treatment. These results should be validated in a randomized controlled trial in order to decide whether or not to treat a patient with BAO.

Revascularization Techniques for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion : Technical Considerations and Outcome in the Setting of Severe Posterior Circulation Steno-Occlusive Disease.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and radiological characteristics, frequency, technical aspects and outcome of endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion (ABO) in the setting of vertebrobasilar steno-occlusive disease. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of databases of two universitary stroke centers including all consecutive patients from January 2013 until May 2017 undergoing thrombectomy for a) acute stroke due to basilar artery occlusion and either significant basilar artery stenosis or vertebral artery stenosis/occlusion as well as b) presumed embolic basilar artery occlusions. Demographics, stroke characteristics, time metrics, recanalization results and outcome were recorded. Interventional strategies were evaluated concerning the thrombectomy technique, additional angioplasty, type of approach with respect to lesion pattern (ipsilateral to steno-occlusive VA lesion: dirty road or contralateral: clean road) and sequence of actions. RESULTS: Out of 157 patients treated for ABO 38 (24.2%) had associated significant vertebrobasilar steno-occlusive lesions. An underlying significant basilar artery stenosis was present in 23.7% and additionally significant steno-occlusive vertebral lesions were present in 81.5%. Thrombectomy was performed with primary aspiration in 15.8% and with stent-retrievers in 84.2%. Successful revascularization (TICI 2b-3) was achieved in 86.8%. In 52.6% additional stent angioplasty was performed, in 7.9% balloon angioplasty only. The clean road approach was used in 22.5% of cases, the dirty road in 77.4%. Final modified Rankin scale (mRS) was 0-2 in 6 patients (15.8%) and 3-5 in 32 (84.2%). The in-hospital mortality was 36.8%. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome compared to presumed cases of embolisms. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of ABO with underlying significant vertebrobasilar steno-occlusive lesions is effective and reasonably safe. Specific procedural strategies apply depending on individual patient pathology and anatomy. Although high rates of recanalization can be achieved, outcomes tend to be poor.

Safety and feasibility of simultaneous endovascular therapy for supra-arch multivessel stenosis in 256 Chinese patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of simultaneous endovascular therapy for supra-arch multivessel stenosis. BACKGROUND: Limited data are currently available on simultaneous intervention for supra-arch multivessel stenosis because of concerns regarding the high incidence of procedure-related complications. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2012, the clinical data of 256 consecutive inpatients who underwent simultaneous intervention for supra-arch multivessel stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was a composite of any type of stroke or neurological death within 30 days. RESULTS: In total, 535 supra-arch vessels underwent endovascular therapy. In total, 234, 21, and 1 patient underwent simultaneous intervention of 2, 3, and 4 supra-arch vessels, respectively. The lesions involved only the anterior circulation in 40.2% (103/256), only the posterior circulation in 10.5% (27/256), and the combined circulations in 49.2% (126/256) patients. The overall procedural success rate was 99.6% (533/535). The incidence of the primary end point was 3.5%. According to the lesion location, the incidence of the primary end point was 3.9% (4/103), 0% (0/27), and 4.0% (5/126) in the patients who underwent endovascular treatment for the anterior circulation alone, posterior circulation alone, and combined circulations, respectively. According to the number of supra-arch lesions, the incidence of the primary end point was 3.4% (8/234), 4.8% (1/21), and 0% (0/1) in the patients who underwent simultaneous intervention of 2, 3, and 4 vessels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that simultaneous intervention for supra-arch multivessel stenosis was safe and technically feasible.