Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Lurbinectedin Administrated with Itraconazole in Cancer Patients: A Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

This open-label, two-part, phase Ib drug-drug interaction study investigated whether the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of lurbinectedin (LRB), a marine-derived drug, are affected by co-administration of itraconazole (ITZ), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. In Part A, three patients were sequentially assigned to Sequence 1 (LRB 0.8 mg/m2, 1-h intravenous [IV] + ITZ 200 mg/day oral in Cycle 1 [C1] and LRB alone 3.2 mg/m2, 1 h, IV in Cycle 2 [C2]). In Part B, 11 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either Sequence 1 (LRB at 0.9 mg/m2 + ITZ in C1 and LRB alone in C2) or Sequence 2 (LRB alone in C1 and LRB + ITZ in C2). Eleven patients were evaluable for PK analysis: three in Part A and eight in Part B (four per sequence). The systemic total exposure of LRB increased with ITZ co-administration: 15% for Cmax, area under the curve (AUC) 2.4-fold for AUC0-t and 2.7-fold for AUC0-∞. Co-administration with ITZ produced statistically significant modifications in the unbound plasma LRB PK parameters. The LRB safety profile was consistent with the toxicities described in previous studies. Co-administration with multiple doses of ITZ significantly altered LRB systemic exposure. Hence, to avoid LRB overexposure when co-administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, an LRB dose reduction proportional to CL reduction should be applied.

Effectiveness and safety of oral terbinafine for dermatophyte distal subungual onychomycosis.

INTRODUCTION: Terbinafine has been a cornerstone in dermatophyte infection treatment. Despite its global efficacy, the emergence of terbinafine resistance raises concerns, requiring ongoing vigilance. AREAS COVERED: This paper focuses on evaluating the efficacy and safety of terbinafine in treating dermatophyte toenail infections. Continuous and pulse therapies, with a 24-week continuous regimen and a higher dosage of 500 mg/day have demonstrated superior efficacy to the FDA approved regimen of 250 mg/day x 12 weeks. Pulse therapies, though showing comparable effectiveness, present debates with regards to their efficacy as conflicting findings have been reported. Safety concerns encompass hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal, cutaneous, neurologic, hematologic and immune adverse-effects, and possible drug interactions, suggesting the need for ongoing monitoring. EXPERT OPINION: Terbinafine efficacy depends on dosage, duration, and resistance patterns. Continuous therapy for 24 weeks and a dosage of 500 mg/day may enhance outcomes, but safety considerations and resistance necessitate individualized approaches. Alternatives, including topical agents and alternative antifungals, are to be considered for resistant cases. Understanding the interplay between treatment parameters, adverse effects, and resistance mechanisms is critical for optimizing therapeutic efficacy while mitigating resistance risks. Patient education and adherence are vital for early detection and management of adverse effects and resistance, contributing to tailored and effective treatments.

Effects of Strong Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 3A and UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 and Strong Induction of Cytochrome P450 3A on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Soticlestat: Two Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Healthy Volunteers.

Two open-label, phase 1 studies (NCT05064449, NCT05098041) investigated the effects of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibition (via itraconazole), UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A9 inhibition (via mefenamic acid), and CYP3A induction (via rifampin) on the pharmacokinetics of soticlestat and its metabolites M-I and M3. In period 1 of both studies, participants received a single dose of soticlestat 300 mg. In period 2, participants received itraconazole on days 1-11 and soticlestat 300 mg on day 5 (itraconazole/mefenamic acid study; part 1); mefenamic acid on days 1-7 and soticlestat 300 mg on day 2 (itraconazole/mefenamic acid study; part 2); or rifampin on days 1-13 and soticlestat 300 mg on day 11 (rifampin study). Twenty-eight healthy adults participated in the itraconazole/mefenamic acid study (14 per part) and 15 participated in the rifampin study (mean age, 38.1-40.7 years; male, 79-93%). For maximum observed concentration, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of soticlestat + itraconazole, mefenamic acid, or rifampin to soticlestat alone were 116.6%, 107.3%, and 13.2%, respectively, for soticlestat; 10.7%, 118.0%, and 266.1%, respectively, for M-I, and 104.6%, 88.2%, and 66.6%, respectively, for M3. For area under the curve from time 0 to infinity, the corresponding GMRs were 124.0%, 100.6%, and 16.4% for soticlestat; 13.3%, 117.0%, and 180.8% for M-I; and 120.3%, 92.6%, and 58.4% for M3. Soticlestat can be administered with strong CYP3A and UGT1A9 inhibitors, but not strong CYP3A inducers (except for antiseizure medications, which will be further evaluated in ongoing phase 3 studies). In both studies, all treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: These drug-drug interaction studies improve our understanding of the potential changes that may arise in soticlestat exposure in patients being treated with CYP3A inhibitors, UGT1A9 inhibitors, or CYP3A inducers. The results build on findings from previously published soticlestat studies and provide important information to help guide clinical practice. Soticlestat has shown positive phase 2 results and is currently in phase 3 development for the treatment of seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole affect pharmacokinetic behavior of famitinib and its active metabolite: results of a single-center, single-arm, open-label and fixed sequence study.

BACKGROUND: Famitinib, the novel oral multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was developed for treatment of patients with advanced solid cancer. This investigation assessed the pharmacokinetic (PK) effects of itraconazole, an officially recommended CYP3A4 strong inhibitor, on famitinib and its metabolite (SHR116637). METHODS: A single-center, single-arm, open-label, and fixed sequence study was conducted in 22 healthy subjects. Famitinib was administered as a single oral 15 mg on Day1. Itraconazole 200 mg once daily was given from Day12 to Day24, concomitantly with famitinib on Day15 and for follow-up during Day30 to Day32. Blood sampling followed each famitinib dosage for PK analysis of famitinib and SHR116637. Safety and tolerability were also assessed throughout the treatment. RESULTS: Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were raised by 40.6%, 77.7% and 81.6%, respectively, and t1/2 was prolonged from 36.08 hours to 48.24 hours for famitinib. In contrast, Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were reduced by 63.5%, 42.6%, and 39.0%, respectively, for SHR116637. Eight (36.4%) subjects reported seventeen treatments that emerged adverse events (all grade 1-2 in severity) all recovered at follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Single oral dose of 15 mg famitinib and co-therapy with 200 mg intraconazole were safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects. Famitinib should be avoided in conjunction with strong CYP3A inhibitors if possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html. (Registration number: CTR20201824.).

The safety of oral antifungals for the treatment of onychomycosis.

INTRODUCTION: Oral antifungals are used for the treatment of moderate-severe onychomycosis. Terbinafine and itraconazole are approved for onychomycosis treatment in North America; additionally, fluconazole is indicated for onychomycosis in Europe. Other oral antifungals such as ketoconazole and griseofulvin are no longer used for the treatment of onychomycosis due to safety concerns and relatively lower efficacy. SEARCH STRATEGY: On 7 March 2023, we conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed and Google Scholar, while also manually examining selected article bibliographies and package inserts. AREAS COVERED: Terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole have several interactions with cytochrome-p450, and either alone, or when co-administered with other drugs these interactions can facilitate a multitude of adverse events. This article identifies possible hepatic, renal, cutaneous, cardiovascular, neurological, hemopoietic, and obstetric adverse events. We have also compared the rates of hepatotoxicity, clinically apparent liver injury, and alanine transaminase elevations between oral antifungals, and recommendations for hepatic monitoring. EXPERT OPINION: We recommend laboratory testing of liver function tests prior to the administration of any oral antifungals, especially when clinically indicated. In the event of a first treatment failure, the diagnosis of onychomycosis must be confirmed, and consideration given to antifungal susceptibility testing. Antifungal stewardship will help reduce the incidence of antifungal resistance.

Phase 1 study to evaluate the effects of rifampin or itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of limertinib (ASK120067), a novel mutant-selective inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor in healthy Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Limertinib is a novel mutant-selective and irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor under development. A phase 1 open, two-period, single-sequence, self-controlled, two-part study was initiated to characterize the effects of a strong CYP3A4 inducer (rifampin) or inhibitor (itraconazole) on the pharmacokinetics of limertinib. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects in each part received a single dose of limertinib alone (160 mg, Part A; 80 mg, Part B) and with multiple doses of rifampin 600 mg once daily (Part A) or itraconazole 200 mg twice daily (Part B). RESULTS: Coadministration of rifampin decreased exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, AUC0-inf) of limertinib and its active metabolite CCB4580030 by 87.86% (geometric least-squares mean [GLSM] ratio, 12.14%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 9.89-14.92) and 66.82% (GLSM ratio, 33.18%; 90% CI, 27.72-39.72), respectively. Coadministration of itraconazole increased the AUC0-inf of limertinib by 289.8% (GLSM ratio, 389.8%; 90% CI, 334.07-454.82), but decreased that of CCB4580030 by 35.96% (GLSM ratio, 64.04%; 90% CI, 50.78-80.77). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the concomitant use of limertinib with strong CYP3A inducers or inhibitors is not recommended. A single dose of limertinib, administered with or without rifampin or itraconazole, is generally safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05631678.

Iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome in a case of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis treated with oral itraconazole and inhaled budesonide.

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a hypersensitivity reaction to Aspergillus fumigatus that occurs in patients with asthma or cystic fibrosis. Here, we report a case of a young female with bronchial asthma who presented to our hospital with worsening breathlessness on exertion. She was diagnosed to have ABPA and was initiated on oral itraconazole while continuing inhaled long acting beta-2 adrenergic agonist and medium dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for her asthma. Three months after initiation of therapy, the patient had significant improvement in breathlessness. However, she had weight gain, facial puffiness, increased facial hair and development of striae on her inner thighs, calf and lower abdomen. Her serum cortisol levels were found to be suppressed and hence a diagnosis of iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome was made. Our case describes the potentially serious interaction between ICS and oral itraconazole, a treatment very commonly prescribed in patients with ABPA.

Comparing the Efficacy for Pulse Versus Continuous Dose Terbinafine Therapy in Patients With Onychomycosis.

Recently, treatment outcomes in patients with toenail onychomycosis have improved considerably due to more effective oral antifungal medications such as terbinafine and itraconazole. These medications can either be used continuously for several weeks at a lower dose or intermittently (pulsed) at a higher dose. Previous literature comparing pulse and continuous therapy has generated mixed results.  Our study aims to compare the efficacy, in terms of clinical cure rate, of continuous vs pulse dose terbinafine regimens for toenail onychomycosis. Sixty patients with onychomycosis of Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI, between 15 and 65 years of age, were divided into a continuous treatment group receiving 250 mg terbinafine once daily for 12 weeks and a pulse treatment group receiving 250 mg twice daily terbinafine for 1 week repeated every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Each patient was followed up at weeks 4, 8, and 12.  Efficacy of the continuous treatment group was significantly greater at 76.67% compared with 26.67% in the pulse treatment group. Thus, we conclude that the clinical cure rate of a continuous dose regimen of terbinafine is a superior treatment option for toenail onychomycosis. However, we also suggest further studies including combinations of multiple agents and hybrid regimen models for the optimal onychomycosis treatment.   J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(10):     doi:10.36849/JDD.7323R1.

Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome Caused by Itraconazole in a 17-Year-Old Girl.

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe adverse drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. We report a case of DRESS syndrome in a 17-year-old female caused by itraconazole, confirmed by patch testing, that required treatment with both corticotherapy and cyclosporine. Our case highlights the importance of clinical suspicion of this syndrome in pediatric age and the novelty of an antifungal drug being identified as the culprit.

Effect of itraconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of valemetostat: An open-label, phase I study in healthy subjects.

Valemetostat tosylate (valemetostat) is an oral, potent, dual inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog (EZH) 2 and EZH1 under investigation for the treatment of cancer, including non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and solid tumors. Itraconazole and fluconazole are antifungal medications often used as typical inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A [itraconazole and fluconazole]) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp [itraconazole]) in drug-drug interaction studies. Valemetostat is a substrate of CYP3A and P-gp in vitro. This phase I, open-label, single-sequence crossover study (JapicCTI-183902) assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of valemetostat when co-administered with itraconazole (a strong CYP3A inhibitor and P-gp inhibitor) or fluconazole (a moderate CYP3A inhibitor) in healthy Japanese male participants 20-45 years of age. Participants were equally allocated to receive two doses of valemetostat 25 mg, once alone and once with either itraconazole or fluconazole (400-mg induction and 200-mg once daily maintenance). Valemetostat PK parameters with versus without itraconazole or fluconazole were compared using analysis of variance models. Overall, 32 participants were enrolled. Co-administration with itraconazole increased valemetostat peak concentration (Cmax ) by 2.9-fold and area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) by 4.2-fold compared with valemetostat alone. When co-administered with fluconazole, the Cmax and AUCinf of valemetostat were each increased by 1.6-fold. No treatment-related or grade ≥3 adverse events were reported. Appropriate valemetostat dose reductions are warranted when used concomitantly with strong CYP3A and P-gp dual inhibitors.

Effects of itraconazole and carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in healthy adults.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a strong cytochrome P450 family (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (carbamazepine) on the pharmacokinetics and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics were measured in two phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence studies in healthy adults. During Period 1, oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg twice daily was administered alone; during Period 2, it was administered with itraconazole or carbamazepine. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered as repeated doses or one dose in the itraconazole and carbamazepine studies, respectively. Nirmatrelvir and ritonavir plasma concentrations and adverse event (AE) rates in both periods were analysed. RESULTS: Each study included 12 participants. Following administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with itraconazole (Test) or alone (Reference), test/reference ratios of the adjusted geometric means (90% CIs) for nirmatrelvir AUCtau and Cmax were 138.82% (129.25%, 149.11%) and 118.57% (112.50%, 124.97%), respectively. After administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with carbamazepine (Test) or alone (Reference), test/reference ratios (90% CIs) of the adjusted geometric means for nirmatrelvir AUCinf and Cmax were 44.50% (33.77%, 58.65%) and 56.82% (47.04%, 68.62%), respectively. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was generally safe when administered with or without itraconazole or carbamazepine. No serious or severe AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor with a strong CYP3A inhibitor used for pharmacokinetic enhancement (i.e., ritonavir) resulted in small increases in plasma nirmatrelvir exposure, whereas coadministration of a strong inducer substantially decreased systemic nirmatrelvir and ritonavir exposures suggesting a contraindication in the label with CYP3A4 strong inducers. Administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir alone or with itraconazole or carbamazepine was generally safe.

Real world co-prescribing contraindicated drugs with fluconazole and itraconazole.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate co-prescribing of contraindicated drugs with fluconazole and itraconazole using real-world nationwide data. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using claims data collected by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea during 2019-2020. To determine the drugs that should be avoided in patients taking fluconazole or itraconazole, Lexicomp® and Micromedex® were used. The co-prescribed medications, co-prescription rates, and potential clinical consequences of the contraindicated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 197 118 prescriptions of fluconazole, 2847 co-prescriptions with drugs classified as contraindicated DDI by either Micromedex® or Lexicomp® were identified. Further, of the 74 618 prescriptions of itraconazole, 984 co-prescriptions with contraindicated DDI were identified. Solifenacin (34.9%), clarithromycin (18.1%), alfuzosin (15.1%), and donepezil (10.4%) were frequently found in the co-prescriptions of fluconazole, whereas tamsulosin (40.4%), solifenacin (21.3%), rupatadine (17.8%), and fluconazole (8.8%) were frequently found in the co-prescriptions of itraconazole. In 1105 and 95 co-prescriptions of fluconazole and itraconazole, accounting for 31.3% of all co-prescriptions, potential DDIs were associated with a risk of corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. Of the total 3831 co-prescriptions, 2959 (77.2%) and 785 (20.5%) were classified as contraindicated DDI by Micromedex® alone and by Lexicomp® alone, respectively, whereas 87 (2.3%) were classified as contraindicated DDI by both Micromedex® and Lexicomp®. CONCLUSIONS: Many co-prescriptions were associated with the risk of DDI-related QTc prolongation, warranting the attention of healthcare providers. Narrowing the discrepancy between databases that provide information on DDIs is required for optimized medicine usage and patient safety.

Q-switched Nd:YAG laser versus itraconazole pulse therapy in treatment of onychomycosis: A clinical dermoscopic and mycologic study.

BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis (OM) represents about 50% of nail disorders. Oral antifungals have proven efficacy in the treatment of onychomycosis but their associated side effects limit their use. Accordingly, there is an increased need for a safe and effective therapy to induce clearance and improve the esthetic appearance of diseased nails. OBJECTIVE: The current study is an attempt to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Q-Switched Nd:YAG (1064 nm) laser as monotherapy versus pulse itraconazole in the clearance of onychomycosis. METHODS: In this prospective study, 40 onychomycosis patients were equally divided into two groups: Groups I (laser group) and II (Itraconazole group). Patients of Group I are treated with six biweekly sessions of Q-Switched Nd:YAG (1064 nm) laser. Patients of Group II are treated with itraconazole pulse therapy. The assessment of clearance was rated using the "Onychomycosis Severity Index (OSI)", photographs, dermoscopy, and mycology. All 40 patients were followed up for 3 months after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Group I's clinical improvement response was a marked improvement in 19 cases and moderate improvement in one case (OSI before treatment was 24.5 and after was 0). A dermoscopic cure occurred in 19 cases. Mycological cure was obtained in 19 cases. Group II's clinical improvement response was marked in 15 and moderate in 5 (OSI before treatment was 24 and after was 0). Dermoscopic cure occurred in 15 cases. Mycological cure was obtained in 15 cases. There were no adverse effects. The clinical response, the dermoscopic cure, and the mycological cure were equal in both groups, with no significant difference found between them. CONCLUSION: Q-Switched Nd:YAG (1064 nm) laser can be used as an effective and safe modality in the clearance of nail onychomycosis, particularly in patients who have a contraindication to or refuse the use of oral antifungals.

Evaluation of the inhibitory effects of itraconazole on letermovir.

AIMS: Letermovir, a cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA terminase complex inhibitor, is a substrate of ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein; P-gp), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1/3, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1, UGT1A3 and possibly ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein; BCRP). A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of itraconazole, a prototypic ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor, on letermovir pharmacokinetics (PK) and the effects of letermovir on itraconazole PK. METHODS: In an open-label, fixed-sequence study in 14 healthy participants, 200 mg oral itraconazole was administered once daily for 4 days. Following a 10-day washout, 480 mg oral letermovir was administered once daily for 14 days (Days 1-14) and then coadministered with 200 mg itraconazole once daily for 4 days (Days 15-18). Intensive PK sampling was performed for letermovir and itraconazole. PK and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Letermovir geometric mean ratio (GMR; 90% confidence interval [CI]) for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24 ) was 1.33 (1.17, 1.51) and for maximum concentration (Cmax ) was 1.21 (1.05, 1.39) following administration with/without itraconazole. Itraconazole GMR (90% CI) for AUC0-24 was 0.76 (0.71, 0.81) and for Cmax was 0.84 (0.76, 0.92) following administration with/without letermovir. Coadministration of letermovir with itraconazole was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in letermovir exposure with coadministration of itraconazole is likely predominantly due to inhibition of intestinal ABCB1 and potentially ABCG2 transport. The mechanism for the decrease in itraconazole exposure is unknown. The modest changes in letermovir and itraconazole PK are not considered clinically meaningful.

Characterization of endogenous markers of hepatic function in patients receiving itraconazole treatment for prophylaxis of deep mycosis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of itraconazole (ITZ) is associated with a risk of inducing hepatotoxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of plasma concentrations of ITZ and its hydroxylated metabolite (OH-ITZ) with endogenous markers of hepatic function. METHODS: Thirty six patients treated with oral ITZ solution for prophylaxis of deep mycosis were enrolled. Plasma concentrations of ITZ and OH-ITZ were determined on the 14th day or later after administration of ITZ. Their associations with endogenous marker levels of hepatic function including plasma coproporphyrin (CP)-I and OATP1B1 genotypes were assessed. RESULTS: The serum level of total bilirubin (T-Bil) was moderately correlated with the plasma concentration of total ITZ (tITZ) and OH-ITZ (tOH-ITZ). T-Bil elevation above 0.3 mg/dL was observed in 19% of patients, although statistically significant difference was not identified. The plasma concentration of tITZ had no correlation with other endogenous markers levels including AST, ALT, albumin, and plasma CP-I. The serum AST and plasma CP-I levels were correlated with the plasma concentration of free OH-ITZ (fOH-ITZ). T-Bil and plasma CP-I, a marker of OATP1B1 activity, were not correlated with each other, and neither was associated with the OATP1B1 genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma ITZ and OH-ITZ had a positive association with T-Bil. The patients with a higher fOH-ITZ level had lower OATP1B1 activity on the basis of plasma CP-I level. ITZ and OH-ITZ have the potential to slightly increase endogenous marker levels of hepatic function, although most likely by different mechanisms.

Effect of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and inducer on the pharmacokinetics of senaparib (IMP4297) in healthy volunteers: A drug-drug interaction study.

AIMS: A phase I open-label study assessed the effect of multiple oral doses of a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetic profile of a single oral dose of senaparib, a novel, highly potent poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor and CYP3A4 substrate, in Chinese healthy male volunteers (HMV). METHODS: Adult HMV were enrolled to the itraconazole or rifampicin group (n = 16 each). In Period 1, all participants received a single oral dose of senaparib 40 mg (itraconazole group) or 100 mg (rifampicin group). In Period 2, the same dose was coadministered with itraconazole (200 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg), respectively. The primary endpoints were senaparib exposure parameters. RESULTS: Coadministration with itraconazole significantly increased exposure of senaparib and decreased that of its major metabolites M9 and M14. Maximum plasma senaparib concentration (Cmax ) was increased by ~79% and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by ~2.8-fold. Coadministration with rifampicin significantly reduced the Cmax and AUC of senaparib by ~59 and 83%, respectively. The Cmax for both M9 and M14 was slightly increased, although AUC was decreased. All treatment-emergent adverse events were grade ≤2, regardless of the treatment administered. CONCLUSION: In Chinese HMV, the exposure of senaparib was significantly increased when coadministered with itraconazole and significantly decreased when coadministered with rifampicin. It is recommended to avoid concomitant use of senaparib and strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4.

Efficacy and safety of miconazole muco-adhesive tablet versus itraconazole in oropharyngeal candidiasis: A randomized, multi-centered, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) is an opportunistic infection treated with anti-fungal agents. Herein, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of miconazole buccal tablets (MBT) and itraconazole capsules in the localized treatment of patients with OPC. In this multi-centered, double-blinded, phase III trial (CTR20130414), both males and non-pregnant females (≥18 years) with OPC were randomized (1:1) to MBT plus placebo (experimental group) or itraconazole capsules plus placebo (control group). The primary endpoint was clinical cure at the end-of-treatment period [visit 4 (V4)] while secondary endpoints were clinical remission rates, partial remission rates, mycological cure, clinical relapse, and adverse events (AEs). All endpoints were statistically analyzed in both the full analysis set (FAS) and per-protocol (PP) set. A total of 431 (experimental: 216; control: 215) subjects were included. At V4, in the FAS set, the clinical cure was achieved in 68% and 59% patients in experimental and control groups, respectively with a treatment difference of 9% [95% confidence interval (CI): -1,19; P < .001] demonstrating non-inferiority of MBT over itraconazole. At V4, mycological cure rates were 68.2% and 42.0% in the experimental group and control groups (P < .001), respectively in FAS. The relapse rates were 5.4% and 6.6%, respectively, in the experimental and control groups. A total of 210 patients experienced AEs during treatment with 47.7% in the experimental group and 49.8% in the control group with no deaths. This study demonstrated that once-daily treatment with MBT was non-inferior to itraconazole with higher mycological cure rates and was tolerable with mild AE in patients with OPC.

Miconazole is an antifungal drug against certain types of fungus or yeast infections. In this study, we showed that treatment with once-daily miconazole buccal tablets was as effective as systemic itraconazole capsules in Chinese patients infected by oropharyngeal candidiasis with minimum side effects.