Therapeutic efficacy of Nano-formulation of lactoperoxidase and lactoferrin via promoting immunomodulatory and apoptotic effects.

This study identifies promising potential of a novel and safer nanocombination of bovine milk lactoperoxidase (LPO) and lactoferrin (LF) to target breast cancer in vitro and in adult female albino rat model. Favorable selective anticancer effects of the prepared nanocombination were observed, in a dose-dependent manner, against both MCF-7 and MDA cell lines, sparing normal HFB-4 cells. The administration of LPO + LFNPs markedly improved the induced-breast cancer disorders, prolonged survival and reduced the values of serum TNF-α, IL1ß, CD4+, ALAT, ASAT, urea, creatinine, cholesterol and triglycerides with remarkable elevation in mammary SOD and GPx activity and GSH level. Moreover, the histopathological findings showed that LPO + LFNPs succeeded in prevention of mammary gland tumorigenesis. Superior efficacy of LPO + LFNPs was observed against pro-inflammatory cytokines through their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. The treatment of LPO + LFNPs more significantly modulated the apoptosis and enhanced the expression of cell cycle regulator genes, which demonstrates a successful tumor therapy in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, this study provided evidence that the chemo-preventive feature of LPO + LFNPs may offer a novel alternative therapy for the treatment of breast cancer through enhances apoptosis pathway, improvement of immune response, reduction of inflammation and restoration of the impaired oxidative stress.

Long-term quality of life and cost-effectiveness of treatment of partial thickness burns: A randomized controlled trial comparing enzyme alginogel vs silver sulfadiazine (FLAM study).

The clinical effectiveness and scar quality of the randomized controlled trial comparing enzyme alginogel with silver sulfadiazine (SSD) for treatment of partial thickness burns were previously reported. Enzyme alginogel did not lead to faster wound healing (primary outcome) or less scar formation. In the current study, the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), costs, and cost-effectiveness of enzyme alginogel compared with SSD in the treatment of partial thickness burns were studied. HRQoL was evaluated using the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire 1 week before discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months postburn. Costs were studied from a societal perspective (health care and nonhealth-care costs) for a follow-up period of 1 year. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and comparing differences in societal costs and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) at 1 year postburn. Forty-one patients were analyzed in the enzyme alginogel group and 48 patients in the SSD group. None of the domains of BSHS-B showed a statistically significant difference between the treatment groups. Also, no statistically significant difference in QALYs was found between enzyme alginogel and SSD (difference -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.09 to 0.03; P = .30). From both the health care and the societal perspective, the difference in costs between enzyme alginogel and SSD was not statistically significant: the difference in health-care costs was €3210 (95% CI, €-1247 to €7667; P = .47) and in societal costs was €3377 (95% CI €-6229 to €12 982; P = .49). The nonsignificant differences in costs and quality-adjusted life-years in favor of SSD resulted in a low probability (<25%) that enzyme alginogel is cost-effective compared to SSD. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in quality of life between both treatment groups. Enzyme alginogel is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with SSD in the treatment of partial thickness burns.

Effect of tablets containing lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase on gingival health in adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of tablets containing lactoferrin (LF) and lactoperoxidase (LPO) on gingival health and oral health-related quality of life in healthy adults. BACKGROUND: Lactoferrin and LPO are host defense factors found in saliva that may contribute to oral health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty adults were randomly assigned to the administration of high-dose tablets (LF 60 mg/d, LPO 7.8 mg/d), low-dose tablets (LF 20 mg/d, LPO 2.6 mg/d), or placebo tablets for 12 weeks. The gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PlI) were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. Oral health-related quality of life was assessed by the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred and nine healthy subjects were included in the efficacy analysis. In the high-dose group, the GI was significantly reduced after 12 weeks of treatment, and the reduction in GI in the high-dose group was significant compared with the placebo group. In both the high-dose group and the low-dose group, PlI showed a significant decrease at 12 weeks compared with baseline. The total OHIP score was significantly reduced at 12 weeks in the high-dose group. In addition, the OHIP functional limitation subscale displayed significant improvement in the high-dose groups compared with the placebo group at 12 weeks. No adverse reactions or serious adverse events related to the test tablets were observed in any of participants during the study, and the incidence of adverse events unrelated to the tablets did not differ significantly among the groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that intake of tablets containing LF (60 mg/d) and LPO (7.8 mg/d) can potentially improve gingival inflammation and oral health-related quality of life in healthy adults.

Flaminal® versus Flamazine® in the treatment of partial thickness burns: A randomized controlled trial on clinical effectiveness and scar quality (FLAM study).

Although partial thickness burns are the most frequently reported burn injuries, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and scar quality of Flaminal® Forte to silver sulfadiazine (Flamazine®) in the treatment of partial thickness burns. In this two-arm open label multicenter randomized controlled trial, adult patients with acute partial thickness burns and an affected total body surface area of less than 30% were randomized between Flaminal® Forte and Flamazine® and followed for 12 months. Dressing changes in the Flamazine® group were performed daily, and in the Flaminal® group during the first 3 days post burn and thereafter every other day until complete wound healing or surgery. Forty-one patients were randomly allocated to Flaminal® Forte and 48 patients to Flamazine®. The primary outcome was time to wound healing, which did not differ between the groups: median 18 days with Flaminal® Forte (range 8-49 days) versus 16 days with Flamazine® (range 7-48 days; p = 0.24). Regarding the secondary outcomes during hospital admission, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups concerning need for surgery, pain scores, pruritus, or pain-related and anticipatory anxiety. More patients in the Flaminal® group developed wound colonization (78% versus 32%, p < 0.001), but the treatment groups did not differ regarding the incidence of local infections and use of systemic antibiotics. In terms of scar quality, no statistically significant differences between both treatment groups were found regarding subjective scar assessment (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)), scar melanin and pigmentation (DermaSpectrometer®), and scar elasticity and maximal extension (Cutometer®) during 12 month postburn. In conclusion, time to wound healing did not differ, but the use of Flaminal® Forte seemed favorable because less dressing changes are needed which lowers the burden of wound care.

Efficacy of GUM® Hydral versus Biotène® Oralbalance mouthwashes plus gels on symptoms of medication-induced xerostomia: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of GUM® Hydral versus Biotène® Oralbalance (both a mouthwash plus gel) on the subjective burden and clinical symptoms of patients with medication-induced xerostomia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects (N = 40) with medication-induced xerostomia (minimum 4/10 mm visual analog scale [VAS]) were randomized to treatment with GUM Hydral or Biotène Oralbalance mouthwash, both with gel, for 28 days. Subjects then entered a 21-day wash-out period, before crossing over to the other treatment for 28 days. Outcomes measured included the VAS, German Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIPG)-14, Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ), after-use questionnaire, and clinical parameters. RESULTS: Both GUM Hydral and Biotène Oralbalance significantly (p < 0.05) reduced VAS, OHIPG-14 total score and single items, and XQ Part 1 (oral dryness, oral pain, taste loss) and Part 2 items. GUM Hydral also significantly reduced the XQ Part 1 dysphagia score, while Biotène Oralbalance significantly reduced the halitosis organoleptic score and plaque index. Significant increases in saliva secretion did not reach clinical relevance. No significant between-group differences were observed, apart from OHIPG-14 items "trouble pronouncing words" and "uncertainty" in favor of GUM Hydral. No adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Both products effectively improve oral health and xerostomia-related quality of life. However, they cannot completely substitute the continuous in-mouth secretion of saliva, and symptomatic relief is temporary. Product selection will be based on personal preference. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both products diminish xerostomic burden and should be part of the management strategy. Affected patients should be informed of these treatments, since no adverse effects were reported.

Effectiveness of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate and lysozyme, lactoferrin, and lactoperoxidase in reducing Streptococcus mutans counts in dentinal caries.

This study compared the capacity of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) to that of a combination of lysozyme, lactoferrin, and lactoperoxidase (LLL) in root canal disinfectant for reducing the Streptococcus mutans counts from dentinal caries. Forty human permanent third molars were selected, and flat dentin surfaces were created. Carious lesions were induced using a microbiological model. The specimens were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 20) according to the type of agent used: group 1, CPP-ACP; group 2, LLL. The S mutans counts were performed before application and after the first, second, and third applications of the agents. The duration of each application was 3 minutes. Carious dentin specimens were homogenized, diluted, and seeded onto mitis salivarius-bacitracin plates for viable counts of S mutans. Results showed that there was no significant reduction in the number of S mutans in group 1 after the applications of CPP-ACP (P > 0.05). In group 2, a significant reduction of S mutans was observed after the third application of LLL (P < 0.01). These results indicate that 3 applications of LLL enzymes can be used to reduce the number of S mutans in dentinal caries lesions.

Subjective Assessment of Enamelon® Preventive Treatment Gel in a Self-Reported Dry-Mouth Population.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of stannous fluoride toothpastes is well established for reducing caries, plaque, and gingivitis and relieving the discomfort of dentin hypersensitivity. Management of dry mouth may include relief remedies in addition to usual oral hygiene methods to maintain oral health and improve quality of life. This 6-week, single-blind, randomized, two-period crossover clinical study was designed to evaluate the oral tolerance and potential of Enamelon® Preventive Treatment Gel (EPTG), with 0.4% stannous fluoride, to relieve subject-perceived dry-mouth symptoms in a self-reported dry-mouth population, after 14 days of use, compared to a marketed over-the-counter (OTC) artificial saliva gel product (Biotene® Oral Balance Gel [BOBG]). METHODS: Following a 7-day washout period, 52 qualified subjects with self-reported dry-mouth symptoms received EPTG or BOBG for once-daily use for 14 days. All subjects brushed each morning and evening with a standard fluoride toothpaste (Sensodyne® ProNamel). Each evening and following brushing with the Sensodyne ProNamel, subjects used their assigned gel product (EPTG or BOBG) as directed. On Days 1, 8, and 15, subjects received an oral examination and assessed relief of dry-mouth symptoms using a product-performance questionnaire (PPQ). Procedures were repeated with the alternate product for another 14-day period, following a 7-day washout. Data for each efficacy endpoint were analyzed using crossover ANOVA model. RESULTS: No treatment-related adverse events were reported in this study, and both products were well tolerated by the subjects. Compared to pre-study ratings of usual dry-mouth remedies, both BOBG and EPTG significantly reduced dry-mouth symptoms following 14 days of use. BOBG was statistically significantly better than EPTG in relieving many of the principal dry-mouth symptoms such as providing immediate relief, having an immediate moisturizing and immediate lubricating effect, feeling comfortable in the mouth, soothing the mouth, effectively lubricating the mouth, and protecting the mouth from drying out (P < .05). Compared with subjects' ratings of their usual dry-mouth remedies, EPTG also provided relief of several dry-mouth symptoms at both Days 8 and 15 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Based on subjective measures of dry mouth and compared with pre-study ratings of usual remedies, subjects perceived that EPTG helped to manage symptoms such as relieving the discomfort of dry mouth, immediately moisturizing and lubricating, effectively lubricating, protecting from drying out, and providing long-lasting moisturization and long-lasting lubrication, and was not irritating to dry-mouth tissues. BOBG, the positive control, was significantly better than EPTG in relieving dry-mouth symptoms over a 2-week period and was not irritating. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients with dry-mouth symptoms may benefit from daily use of a non-irritating, OTC fluoride preventive treatment gel product to relieve symptoms while also reducing the risks of developing dental caries, demineralization, dentin hypersensitivity, and gingivitis.

A randomized clinical trial in subjects with dry mouth evaluating subjective perceptions of an experimental oral gel, an oral rinse and a mouth spray compared to water.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized, parallel group study analyzed the effectiveness of an experimental oral gel, a commercially available oral rinse and a commercially available mouth spray versus water alone at relieving self-reported symptoms of dry mouth over a 28-day home use treatment period. The effects of the study treatments on dry mouth-related quality of life (QoL) were also investigated. METHODS: Eligible subjects were stratified by dry mouth severity (mild, moderate or severe) and randomized to receive one of the study treatments. Prior to first use they completed a questionnaire designed to assess their baseline dry mouth-related QoL. Following first use and on Day 8 (2 hours post-treatment only) and Day 29, subjects completed the modified Product Performance and Attributes Questionnaire (PPAQ) I at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hours post-treatment. Subjects further assessed treatment performance using the PPAQ II questionnaire on Days 8 and 29 and the dry mouth-related QoL questionnaire on Day 29. RESULTS: In 396 randomized subjects almost all comparisons of responses to PPAQ I, including those for the primary endpoint (response to PPAQ I Question 1 'Relieving the discomfort of dry mouth' after 2 hours on Day 29), were statistically significant in favor of active treatment groups versus water (P < 0.05). All comparisons of responses to PPAQ II on Days 8 and 29 were statistically significant in favor of active treatments versus water (P < 0.05). Moreover, nearly all comparisons for dry mouth-related QoL scores on Day 29 were statistically significant in favor of the active treatments versus water. All the dry mouth management strategies in this trial were well tolerated.

Clinical effectiveness, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of Flaminal® versus Flamazine® in the treatment of partial thickness burns: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Partial thickness burns are painful, difficult to manage and can have a negative effect on quality of life through scarring, permanent disfigurement and loss of function. The aim of burn treatment in partial thickness burns is to save lives, stimulate wound healing by creating an optimumly moist wound environment, to have debriding and analgesic effects, protect the wound from infection and be convenient for the patient and caregivers. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment of partial thickness wounds. Flaminal® and Flamazine® are two standard treatment options that provide the above mentioned properties in burn treatment. Nevertheless, no randomized controlled study has yet compared these two common treatment modalities in partial thickness burns. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of Flaminal® versus Flamazine® in the treatment of partial thickness burns. METHODS/DESIGN: In this two-arm open multi-center randomized controlled trial, 90 patients will be randomized between Flaminal® and Flamazine® and followed for 12 months. The study population will consist of competent or temporarily non-competent (because of sedation and/or intubation) patients, 18 years of age or older, with acute partial thickness burns and a total body surface area (TBSA) of less than 30 %. The main study outcome is time to complete re-epithelialization (greater than 95 %). Secondary outcome measures include need for grafting, wound colonization/infection, number of dressing changes, pain and anxiety, scar formation, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and costs. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to the optimal treatment of patients with partial thickness burn wounds and will provide evidence on the (cost-)effectiveness and quality of life of Flaminal® versus Flamazine® in the treatment of partial thickness burns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR4486 , registered on 2 April 2014.

A randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess effects of the single ingestion of a tablet containing lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, and glucose oxidase on oral malodor.

BACKGROUND: The main components of oral malodor have been identified as volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) including hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methyl mercaptan (CH3SH). VSCs also play an important role in the progression of periodontal disease. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of the single ingestion of a tablet containing 20 mg of lactoferrin, 2.6 mg of lactoperoxidase, and 2.6 mg of glucose oxidase on VSCs in the mouth. METHOD: Subjects with VSCs greater than the olfactory threshold in their mouth air ingested a test or placebo tablet in two crossover phases. The concentrations of VSCs were monitored at baseline and 10 and 30 min after ingestion of the tablets using portable gas chromatography. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects were included in the efficacy analysis based on a full analysis set (FAS). The concentrations of total VSCs and H2S at 10 min were significantly lower in the test group than in the placebo group (-0.246 log ng/10 ml [95 % CI -0.395 to -0.098], P = 0.002; -0.349 log ng/10 ml; 95 % CI -0.506 to -0.192; P < 0.001, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, a significant difference in the concentration of total VSCs between the groups was also observed when subjects were fractionated by sex (male or female) and age (20-55 or 56-65 years). The reducing effect on total VSCs positively correlated with the probing pocket depth (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the ingestion of a tablet containing lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, and glucose oxidase has suppressive effects on oral malodor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (number: UMIN000015140 , date of registration: 16/09/2014).

Clinical efficacy of a bleaching enzyme-based toothpaste. A double-blind controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a bleaching enzyme-based toothpaste. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was carried out, comprising 48 participants with teeth exhibiting color A3 or higher according to the Vita Classical guide. One-half of the sample received the bleaching enzyme-based toothpaste (White Kin(®)), while the other received placebo toothpaste. Both products were supplied in identical containers and had the same composition except for the active components. The teeth color was measured with a spectrophotometer. The patients were instructed to brush their teeth three times a day during 3 min with the assigned product, during 12 weeks. The color measurements were repeated after 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks of treatment. Color variation was based on the CIE L*a*b* coordinates, ΔE and the EW index. The relationship of these variables at different observation times were performed using a generalized estimating equations model, which evaluated the effect of treatment, time and interaction. RESULTS: The patients using the bleaching enzyme-based toothpaste showed an increase in lightness (80.14 -treatment- versus 79.25 -control group-) and a reduction in component b*. ΔE was found higher in the treatment group (p=0.064), close to statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The bleaching enzyme-based toothpaste could be potentially efficient in the modification in tooth color progressing from the third to ninth week of treatment, tending to stabilize after the ninth week. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A very low carbamide peroxide concentration, with the incorporation of lactoperoxidase, tooth paste, tends to offer clinically satisfactory results, in terms of modifications in tooth color, nevertheless no significant differences were founded when compared to the control group, with an oral hygiene controlled along the study.

Acute external ear lesions: clinical aspects, assessment and management.

Acute external ear lesions: clinical aspects, assessment and management. We reviewed the literature concerning the assessment and the management of the external ear traumas, which is not very rich. Nevertheless, we outlined the practical attitudes in the four major conditions met: the auricular haematoma, the auricular perichondritis, the auricular laceration and auricular bums. All these pathologies must be promptly treated because there is a risk of perichondritis, which can destroy the cartilage and will result in a severely deformed ear. Auricular haematomas must be drained as soon as possible, lacerations with exposed cartilage must be stitched urgently, and burnt ears should be washed, coated with alginates (Flaminal@) and covered with a loose dressing. Antibioprophyl- axy should always be prescribed after a complete microbiological sampling.

A randomized, crossover trial to evaluate the effect of two mouthrinses on plaque regrowth in the absence of brushing.

This study assessed the effects on plaque in the absence of brushing of two twice-daily mouthrinses, one with an enzymatic-based formulation (Biotène) and one with an antimicrobial chlorhexidine-based formulation (Peridex), and sterile water. Plaque levels were assessed in 23 participants using a 4-day, nonbrushing plaque regrowth model after twice-daily rinsing with sterile water (negative control), the enzyme-based mouthrinse, or the chlorhexidine-based mouthrinse (positive control). Peridex showed significantly greater prevention of plaque regrowth when compared with water and the enzyme-based Biotène mouthrinse. After 4 days, the enzyme-based mouthrinse was associated with a small but nonsignificant reduction in plaque regrowth compared with water. This study confirmed that Peridex is effective at prevention of plaque regrowth. Twice-daily rinsing with a Biotène formula that contained enzymes showed a small but nonsignificant trend toward prevention of plaque regrowth versus rinsing with water.

Efficacy and safety of a new oral saliva equivalent in the management of xerostomia: a national, multicenter, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE AND STUDY DESIGN: The clinical efficacy, safety, and acceptability of a new oral saliva equivalent (Novasial) administered four times daily in the treatment of xerostomia in various medical conditions was compared with that of oxygenated glycerol triester oral spray (Aequasyal) and a moisturizing spray (Biotene) in a 2-week, multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Assessment included patient-based evaluation of mouth dryness score (primary endpoint) with a visual analog scale (VAS), blinded assessment of the oral tissue condition by a four-point ordinal scale, and patient-based assessment of tolerability and acceptability. RESULTS: At day 14, Novasial decreased oral mouth dryness by 19.5%, (12.5 ± 22.6 mm, P < .0001 versus baseline), versus 10% (6.6 ± 17.9 mm with Aequasyal, P < .0001 versus Baseline; and P < .0156 versus Novasial) and 13% (8.6 ± 18.9 mm) with Biotene (P < .0001 versus baseline). The 50% decrease in the primary endpoint was not achieved, and the overall efficacy of Novasial and Aequasyal were similar with respect to xerostomia. Novasial was preferred to Aequasyal and Biotene in alleviating taste alteration and chewing difficulty. Treatment compliance was higher with Novasial (P = .0014 versus Aequasyal). The treatments improved the oral condition with equal efficacy and were safe and well tolerated (VAS 72-77 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Novasial was a safe, well-tolerated, and acceptable treatment in patients with xerostomia induced by various treatments or pathologic conditions.

Oral care may reduce pneumonia in the tube-fed elderly: a preliminary study.

Pneumonia is one of the most important diseases in terms of mortality in the elderly. In particular, bedridden patients who are forbidden oral ingestion during enteral nutrition may have a poor outcome resulting from a respiratory infection. Oral hygiene can play a positive role in preventing aspiration pneumonia in the elderly. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of oral hygiene for bedridden and tube-fed patients at an increased risk of pneumonia. This retrospective study was conducted from July 2011 to June 2013 on a long-term-care hospital unit. The oral care protocol (OCP) intervention commenced in July 2012, during the study period. The subjects of this study were 63 elderly patients with a mean age of 81.7 years. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the OCP intervention group, and the mean observation length was 130.4 days; the mean observation length for the 32 patients in the control group was 128.4 days. The incidence of pneumonia and the numbers of days with a recorded fever, antibiotics administration, blood tests, and radiological examinations were reduced from 1.20 to 0.45, 24.57 to 17.48, 25.52 to 10.12, 10.91 to 6.54, and 6.33 to 3.09 %, respectively. These reductions were significantly less in the OCP intervention group. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that daily oral care for tube-fed patients who do not receive nutrition by mouth reduced the incidence of pneumonia. In addition to patients consuming food by mouth, all tube-fed patients require dedicated oral care to maintain healthy oral conditions.

A pilot study of Biotene OralBalance® gel for oral care in mechanically ventilated preterm neonates.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In adults on mechanical ventilation, timed oral care decreases the frequency of VAP, but this approach has not been studied in neonates. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized trial of timed oral care with Biotene OralBalance® gel and estimate the required sample size for such a trial. METHODS: Infants were eligible for enrollment if they were born before 28 weeks of gestation, and were mechanically ventilated between 7 and 10 postnatal days. Infants were randomized to receive timed oral care with Biotene OralBalance® gel or sterile water. All subjects were treated with a standard bundle of procedures to reduce the risk of VAP. RESULTS: We enrolled 41 of 46 eligible infants (89%). Compliance with timed oral care protocol was 97%. No local oral side effects of Biotene OralBalance® gel were observed. There were no significant group differences in mortality or short-term outcomes, except length of hospital stay which was significantly shorter in the Sterile water group (p = 0.02). A lower rate of VAP was found in the Biotene group, although the difference was not statistically significant (9/1000 ventilator-days versus 17/1000 ventilator-days in the Sterile water group, respectively; p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study support the feasibility of a randomized trial of timed oral care with Biotene OralBalance® gel for prevention of VAP in mechanically ventilated neonates.

Reduction of erosion by protein-containing toothpastes.

AIM: To assess the effect of protein-containing toothpastes on the progression of dental erosion in situ (with pellicle) and in vitro (without pellicle). METHODS: A combined split-mouth (extraoral water or toothpaste brushing) and crossover (type of toothpaste) setup was used. Two protein-containing (high/low concentrations of colostrum) and one nonprotein (placebo) toothpaste were investigated. Sixteen volunteers wore intraoral appliances containing 2 human enamel samples on 3 afternoons for pellicle growth during 90 min. One enamel sample was brushed for 5 s with one of the three toothpastes and subsequently exposed to a slurry of the corresponding toothpaste for 2 min. The other sample was exposed to water. Both samples were subsequently exposed to citric acid (extraorally). Loss of calcium and inorganic phosphate were determined. The same sequence of exposures was applied to 16 enamel samples in an in vitro setup without pellicle. RESULTS: With the in situ-formed pellicle, all toothpastes significantly reduced calcium loss compared to water brushing, although no significant differences were found among toothpastes (p = 0.073). For the loss of phosphate, a significant reduction could be found with the use of the high-protein toothpaste compared to the nonprotein toothpaste. Overall there were only slight differences between the toothpastes. Toothpaste effects were less clear in the in vitro experiment. CONCLUSION: The addition of proteins to toothpaste shows some promise for the prevention of erosion. Further research is needed to investigate the performance of the protein-containing toothpastes in longer in situ studies with regard to erosive wear.

Therapeutic effectiveness of a new enzymatic bleaching dentifrice.

BACKGROUND: Research into bleaching focuses on new products in order to minimize undesirable effects. This study evaluated the bleaching effectiveness of a new enzymatic-activated dentifrice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 volunteers were bleached with a dentifrice containing 5% lactoperoxidase and 3% carbamide peroxide applied three times a day for two minutes over 21 days. Color was recorded before and after the treatment using a spectrophotometer. CIELAB differences were calculated before and after treatment using the paired t test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Lightness was significantly higher after treatment (P < 0.001), ΔE was 5.14. The maxillary central incisors showed greater lightness than the laterals and canines, both before and after treatment, and a greater tendency towards green and blue; the same occurred in the mandibular central incisors in comparison to the canines and laterals. CONCLUSIONS: The use of brush-applied enzyme-activated carbamide peroxide at low concentrations with short exposure time is effective for whitening teeth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Enzymatic dental bleaching is able to increase the efficiency of low concentration peroxides, reducing the potential risk of peroxides on oral tissues.

Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system combined with edible Laminaria hot-water extract as a source of halide ions.

Hot-water extracts prepared from nine out of 12 samples of dried edible Laminaria reduced the viable numbers of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Esherichia coli below the detection limit after incubation for 5 min when combined with lactoperoxidase, glucose oxidase, and glucose. Some extracts showed higher bactericidal activity and a higher OI(-) concentration in the assay mixture after ultrafiltration.

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Biotène Oral Balance in patients with secondary Sjögren's syndrome: a pilot study.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of Oral Balance saliva substitute in alleviating dry mouth symptoms in a sample of patients with secondary Sjögren's syndrome. Twenty-one consecutive secondary Sjögren's syndrome patients with dry mouth complaints and hyposalivation were included in this study. Patients used a lactoperoxidase-system-containing gel (Biotène Oral Balance) for 4 weeks. The effects on subjective oral symptoms were recorded by means of a 7-items questionnaire which contained questions regarding dry mouth sensation and its effect on chewing, swallowing, taste, speech, burning sensation and denture retention. The severity of symptoms was assessed using a visual analogical scale. Oral symptom scores and unstimulated whole salivary flow were recorded at baseline and after 4 weeks' use of the product. Two patients withdrew from the study, because of nausea and unpleasant taste caused by the product. Nineteen patients (all women, mean age 52.7 years) participated throughout the entire study. Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests indicated significant improvements in visual analogical scale scores posttreatment for 5 of the 7 items on the oral dryness questionnaire, although no increase in salivary flow was found. However, the improvement in certain variables did not take a positive course in all cases. Patients with lower salivary flow at baseline tended to have greater improvement in oral symptoms. The study suggests that the use of Oral Balance gel is effective in alleviating the dry mouth symptoms in secondary Sjögren's syndrome patients, but a randomized controlled trial is needed to assess the placebo effect.