Triglicéridos, colesterol HDL y dislipidemia aterogénica en la guía europea para el control de las dislipidemias 2019 / Triglycerides, HDL cholesterol and atherogenic dyslipidaemia in the 2019 European guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias

En general, las guías de práctica clínica tanto europeas con americanas han abordado el control de la dislipidemia aterogénica de forma poco convincente e incluso superficial, en gran medida por las limitaciones terapéuticas disponibles. En consecuencia, esta dislipidemia está infradiagnosticada, infratratada e infracontrolada. Dada la reciente aparición de la guía 2019 de la European Atherosclerosis Society y de la European Society of Cardiology sobre el control de las dislipidemias, parece oportuno examinar su posicionamiento con respecto a la dislipidemia aterogénica y/o sus principales componentes, el aumento en las lipoproteínas ricas en triglicéridos y la disminución del colesterol de las lipoproteínas de alta densidad

In general, both European and American clinical guidelines have addressed the management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia in an unconvincing and even superficial way, largely because of the available therapeutic limitations. Consequently, this type of dyslipidaemia is underdiagnosed, under-treated, and under-controlled. Given the recent presentation of the 2019 guidelines of the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Cardiology on the management of dyslipidaemias, it seems appropriate to examine its position with respect to atherogenic dyslipidaemia and/or its main components, the increase in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and the decrease of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HDL cholesterol performance using an ultracentrifugation reference measurement procedure and the designated comparison method.

BACKGROUND: Accurate high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) measurements are important for management of cardiovascular diseases. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network (CRMLN) perform ultracentrifugation (UC) reference measurement procedure (RMP) to value assign HDL-C. Japanese CRMLN laboratory (Osaka) concurrently runs UC procedure and the designated comparison method (DCM). Osaka performance of UC and DCM was examined and compared with CDC RMP. METHODS: CDC RMP involved UC, heparin-MnCl2 precipitation, and cholesterol analysis. CRMLN DCM for samples containing <200 mg/dl triglycerides involved 50-kDa dextran sulfate-MgCl2 precipitation and cholesterol determination. RESULTS: HDL-C regression equations obtained with CDC (x) and Osaka (y) were y=0.992x+0.542 (R(2)=0.996) for Osaka UC and y=1.004x-0.181 (R(2)=0.998) for DCM. Pass rates within ±1 mg/dl of the CDC target value were 91.9 and 92.1% for Osaka UC and DCM, respectively. Biases at 40 mg/dl HDL-C were +0.22 and -0.02 mg/dl for Osaka UC and DCM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Osaka UC and DCM were highly accurate, precise, and stable for many years, assisting manufacturers to calibrate products for clinical laboratories to accurately measure HDL-C for patients, calculate non-HDL-C, and estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the Friedewald equation.

Non-competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for human apolipoprotein SAA or S.

Purified antibodies against human apolipoprotein S were used to measure apo S levels in human plasma by a sandwich ELISA technique. The method developed was highly sensitive and specific. A reliable calibration of a plasma standard was obtained by reassociating the purified protein with plasma HDL. A significant correlation (r = 0.69) was found between plasma apo S and CRP values. This correlation coefficient reached 0.97 when the plasma samples were selected according to additional clinical and laboratory criteria.