Comparative Evaluation of Visual Outcomes in Combined Cataract and Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane with an Advanced or Conventional Intraocular Lens.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of new monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in comparison with conventional monofocal IOL in patients undergoing combined cataract and vitrectomy surgery for epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: This prospective non-randomized comparative study included 65 eyes of 65 patients who underwent combined cataract and vitrectomy for ERM with implantation of advanced monofocal IOL (Eyhance ICB00, 33 patients) and standard monofocal IOL (Tecnis ZCB00, 32 patients). Monocular visual acuities were measured 6 months post-operatively, including corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA, UCDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), and uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA). Furthermore, contrast sensitivity and metamorphopsia were measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between two groups regarding operation time, post-operative CDVA, UCDVA, UCNVA, and spherical equivalent (p > 0.05). Monocular UCIVA was significantly higher in the Eyhance IOL group than in the Tecnis IOL group (p = 0.005). The photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivities were comparable between each group for any spatial frequency (p > 0.05). The correlation coefficients from correlations between retinal wrinkling ratio and M score did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.877), and the degree of metamorphopsia was not significantly related to the type of IOL (p = 0.969). CONCLUSIONS: In combined cataract and vitrectomy for ERM, Eyhance IOL provided significant better visual performance at intermediate distance than standard monofocal IOL without compromising operation time, distance vision, contrast sensitivity, and evaluating metamorphopsia. Eyhance IOL can be a useful option for both surgeons and patients.

Comparison of postoperative morphological changes and retinal displacement in diabetic and idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative retinal displacement by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERM) and diabetic epiretinal membranes (dERM). METHODS: This retrospective study included 36 iERM and 22 dERM cases. In cross-sectional OCT images (B-scan) the presence of foveal pit, subfoveal fluid, cotton ball sign (CBS), intraretinal cystic changes (ICC), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRILs) and ectopic inner foveal layer (EIFL) were recorded. Central macular thickness (CMT) and EIFL thicknesses were calculated. Retinal displacement was quantified using infrared image of OCT approach consisting of the fovea to disc margin, interarcade distance and perimacular distances. RESULTS: The presence of subfoveal fluid (p = 0.014) and DRIL (p = 0.02) was significantly higher in the dERM group. CMT decreased significantly in both groups (p˂0.001). The EIFL was significantly thicker in the iERM group compared to the dERM group (p = 0.049), and it decreased significantly in the iERM group postoperatively. In the iERM group, while the fovea-disc margin distance decreased, the interarcade and perimacular distance increased significantly (p˂0.001). In the dERM group, the disc-fovea distance change was not significant (p = 0.082). Significant visual improvement was achieved with vitrectomy in both groups (p˂0.001). In the dERM group, the presence of DRIL was associated with lower pre and post-op visual acuity (VA) (r = 0.596 and p = 0.004 for pre-operative and r = 0.567 and p = 0.007 for post-operative). CONCLUSION: Significant retinal displacement occurs after vitrectomy in both iERM and dERM. The low VA in the dERM group may be related to the presence of DRILs.

Foveal Microstructure and Visual Outcomes after Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Patients with Different Types of Epiretinal Membrane Foveoschisis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of the epiretinal membrane foveoschisis (ERM-FS) with different morphological types. METHODS: This retrospective observational study reviewed 44 consecutive ERM-FS patients who underwent ERM surgery. According to the optical coherence tomography images, ERM-FS was classified into three groups: group A, FS crossed the fovea with the foveola elevated; group B, FS located at the foveal edges with a near-normal central foveal point thickness; and group C, FS with undermined foveal edges with a near-normal central foveal point thickness. RESULTS: There were 10 eyes in group A, 20 eyes in group B, and 14 eyes in group C. Preoperatively, eyes in group A had the best best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the thickest central foveal point thickness, and the highest ellipsoid zone (EZ) intact rate among the three groups. After surgery, a resolution of foveoschisis was observed in 40.0%, 45.0%, and 50.0% of the eyes in group A, group B, and group C (p = 0.928), respectively. BCVA was significantly improved postoperatively. Although there was no significant difference in BCVA among the three groups at 1 month postoperatively, BCVA of group A was the best at 4 and 10 months. Correlation analysis indicated that the type of ERM-FS, baseline BCVA, central foveal point thickness, and postoperative EZ continuity (all p < 0.05) were important factors for the final BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: The damage to the retinal structure and visual function was milder in group A ERM-FS. Our study emphasized the necessity of OCT-based subtyping in patients with ERM-FS.

25-GAUGE VERSUS 27-GAUGE VITRECTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF VITREORETINAL DISEASES: A Large Prospective Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and performance clinical outcomes of the 27-gauge (G) two-dimensional cutting vitrectomy probe versus a standard 25-G probe for retinal procedures. METHODS: In this large randomized prospective study, all candidates for epiretinal membrane or macular hole surgery were randomized to the 27-G group or 25-G group. Outcome measures included surgery time, changes in best-corrected distance visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and central macular thickness between baseline and 1-month and 3-month follow-up time points. Moreover, intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated as well as the rate of sutureless vitrectomy. RESULTS: A total of 463 patients were included in this study, 227 patients in the 27-G group and 236 patients in the 25-G group. A similar total surgery time was found between both groups ( P = 0.0911). Similar best-corrected distance visual acuity and central macular thickness changes were observed between baseline and the 1-month and 3-month follow-up visits. No significant differences were reported in intraoperative and postoperative complications rates. The rate of sutureless vitrectomy was 96.5% for the 27-G group and 91.1% for the 25-G group ( P = 0.0170). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that 27-G vitrectomy probe is similar to 25-G probe in surgery time and complications, while decreasing the need for vitrectomy sutures.

Long-term functional outcomes and vision-related quality of life after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane: a prospective cohort study.

To investigate the long-term effect of unilateral idiopathic epiretinal membrane (uiERM) removal on monocular and binocular visual function, and on vision-related quality of life (VR-QoL). Prospective, single-center study. The following data were collected before and after surgery: distance monocular and binocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), horizontal and vertical metamorphopsia, horizontal and vertical aniseikonia, stereoacuity and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 item (NEI VFQ-25). Forty-two patients (mean age: 72.7 ± 7.4 years; 24 men) were included. At 6 months postoperatively, distance monocular BCVA (p < 0.001), horizontal metamorphopsia (p = 0.001) and the composite score of NEI VFQ-25 (p < 0.001) significantly improved, in comparison to baseline. At 2 years postoperatively, distance monocular (p < 0.001) and binocular (p = 0.01) BCVA, horizontal (p < 0.001) and vertical (p = 0.02) metamorphopsia, vertical aniseikonia (p = 0.01), stereoacuity (p < 0.001) and 3 subscales scores of the NEI VFQ-25 (p < 0.05) ("general vision", "mental health", "driving") significantly improved in comparison to baseline. Removal of uiERM improves VR-QoL and achieves good visual outcomes on both monocular and binocular visual parameters over long-term. Visual symptoms induced by macular contraction have different improvement kinetics after surgery. Stereopsis, the highest level of binocular vision, can be improved in some cases.

The efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreous macular traction.

PURPOSE: To estimate the efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreous macular traction (VMT). METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE and Ovid were searched up to May 2020 to identify related studies. Statistical analysis was conducted by R software version 3.6.3. Results in proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by means of Freeman-Tukey variant of arcsine square transformation. RESULTS: The pooling results indicated the overall complete release rate was 50% (95% CI [45%-54%]). For VMT patients younger than 65 years old, with smaller adhesion size of VMT (<1500 µm), phakic eyes, with macular hole (MH) and subretinal fluid (SRF), while without epiretinal membrane (ERM), ocriplasmin could achieve much higher complete release rates than those under opposite conditions. The general nonsurgical closure rate of MH was 34% (95% CI [30%-37%]), and it was positively correlated with the MH size. The visual improvement rate was 45% (95% CI [32%-59%]), and it was higher for patients with VMT resolution (59%, 95% CI [41%-75%]). The secondary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) rate for patients without MH closure or VMT resolution was about 31% (95% CI [23%-39%]). The incidence of MH progression was 10% (95% CI [4%-18%]), and other severe adverse events such as endophthalmitis, retinal detachment and retinal tear were relatively rare. CONCLUSION: Ocriplasmin is an effective, reliable and relatively safe intervention for the treatment of VMT. The most suitable candidates were patients younger than 65 years old, with smaller adhesion size (<1500 µm), phakic eyes, with MH and SRF, while without ERM.

PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF ELLIPSOID ZONE DAMAGE AFTER PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE.

PURPOSE: To assess factors associated with external limiting membrane (ELM)/ellipsoid zone (EZ) damage after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for epiretinal membrane and evaluate ELM/EZ damage impact on functional and anatomical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent PPV with epiretinal membrane ± inner limiting membrane peeling were retrospectively analyzed. Best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were longitudinally collected based on the available follow-up. Demographic data, clinical data, and surgical details were included in logistic regression models having ELM/EZ damage as a binary outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 179 eyes (171 patients) were included; 93 had a 12-month follow-up. Thirty-four eyes (19%) had ELM/EZ damage after surgery; in nine eyes (5%), ELM/EZ damage persisted at 12 months. Phacoemulsification during PPV (odds ratio = 6.97; P = 0.007) and ELM/EZ damage before PPV (odds ratio = 6.91; P = 0.007) were risk factors for postoperative ELM/EZ disruption. Thicker outer nuclear layer (P = 0.002), thicker ectopic inner foveal layer (P < 0.001), and higher endoillumination power (P = 0.03) were associated with slower visual recovery. Inner limiting membrane peeling (P = 0.04) was associated with slower anatomical recovery. CONCLUSION: Cataract extraction and outer retinal damage before PPV are associated with higher risk of photoreceptor damage postoperatively. The rate of visual improvement varies as a function of retinal layers' distortion before surgery; additional retinal manipulation slows restoration of the macular anatomy.

LONGITUDINAL ELLIPSOID ZONE AND OUTER RETINAL INTEGRITY DYNAMICS AFTER EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY.

PURPOSE: To quantify ellipsoid zone (EZ) changes in integrity after epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery, correlate findings to visual acuity, and determine predictors for prognosis. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of eyes undergoing ERM surgery pooled from the prospective DISCOVER intraoperative optical coherence tomography study and eyes undergoing conventional ERM surgery without intraoperative optical coherence tomography. Quantitative EZ features were extracted using a multilayer machine learning enabled automated segmentation platform after image analyst review/correction for segmentation accuracy. Visual acuity and EZ integrity were quantitatively assessed and correlated before and after ERM surgery. Multiple linear regression was performed to assess preoperative visual acuity and EZ features as predictors for improvement in visual acuity or EZ integrity. RESULTS: There were 177 eyes from 177 subjects that underwent ERM surgery from the DISCOVER and conventional arms. Improvement in visual acuity and multiple EZ integrity features was noted after ERM surgery, including EZ partial attenuation and EZ-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) volume (P < 0.05). A reduction in EZ partial attenuation and increase in EZ-RPE central subfield thickness (EZ-RPE CST) was significantly correlated with improved visual acuity after ERM surgery (P < 0.05). More robust EZ-RPE CST at baseline predicted visual acuity improvement after ERM peel in regression modeling (ß = 0.005, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal assessment of EZ features demonstrates significant postoperative improvement in multiple EZ integrity metrics after ERM surgery. Improving EZ integrity was correlated to improving the visual acuity. Ellipsoid zone integrity and visual acuity were significant predictors in regression modeling and may have value in clinical prognostication.

MICROVASCULAR LEAKAGE IS A POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTOR FOR IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE: A Fluorescein Angiography Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the angiographic findings assessed using fluorescein angiography and their prognostic values of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. METHODS: Seventy-three eyes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane that had been followed up for 6 months after surgical treatment were included. Midphase fluorescein angiography images were obtained at baseline. Structural changes, including central subfield macular thickness, intraretinal cystic lesion, and ectopic inner retinal layer on the fovea, were assessed using optical coherence tomography. The main outcome measures were microvascular leakage (ML) and its association with optical coherence tomography findings and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Of a total of 73 eyes, 37 showed ML and had worse BCVA (P = 0.040), greater central subfield macular thickness (P = 0.028), and more ectopic inner retinal layer (P < 0.001) than those without ML at baseline. Also, ML was associated with worse postoperative BCVA (P < 0.001) and ectopic inner retinal layers (P < 0.001; P = 0.034) at baseline and 6 months. The baseline factors associated with postoperative BCVA of ≥20/25 were better BCVA (P = 0.027) and the absence of ML (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Half of the idiopathic epiretinal membrane eyes showed that ML was associated with inner retinal deformity and poor visual recovery. Fluorescein angiography helped to predict visual prognosis after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Epiretinal Membrane.

Epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a common retinal disease characterized by cellular proliferation and metaplasia that lead to the formation of a pathological fibrocellular membrane immediately superjacent to the inner retinal surface. The vast majority of ERMs are considered idiopathic. However, ERM formation can result from various primary intraocular diseases, including retinal breaks and detachment, retinal vascular diseases, and vitreoretinal inflammatory conditions. Although ERMs are generally asymptomatic or cause mild metamorphopsia and/or a modest decrease in visual acuity, some can cause severe macular distortion and macular edema, resulting in significantly impaired function. Surgical removal of ERM is the only treatment, and improvements in vitrectomy systems have enabled less invasive treatment. However, there are currently no standardized criteria for ERM surgery, and the indications for surgery are determined from the patient's subjective symptoms. Another problem with ERM surgery is that not all patients show satisfactory postoperative recovery of visual function. Thus, further research is needed to determine the criteria for ERM surgery and methods to improve the postoperative prognosis.

EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIFOCAL VERSUS MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual/anatomical outcomes and feasibility of epiretinal membrane surgery between patients with multifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 46 patients who underwent epiretinal membrane surgery under multifocal or monofocal IOL pseudophakia. The operation time, mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity, and central macular thickness, and complications were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Macular surgery was performed in 22 and 24 eyes with multifocal and monofocal IOLs, respectively. The total operation time and the total membrane peeling time were similar in both groups (P = 0.125, P = 0.462, respectively). The mean time to create a membrane edge or flap with retinal microforceps was longer for multifocal than for monofocal IOLs (P = 0.013). The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were similar in both groups (P = 0.682, P = 0.741, respectively). Complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: With multifocal IOLs, vision outside the central surgical field was blurred, requiring more time to create the membrane flap. Retinal surgeons should anticipate the difficulty in precise focusing when creating a membrane flap in macular surgery in patients with multifocal IOLs and should pay more attention to the macular surgery.

FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION PATIENTS WITH TWO DISTINCT ENTITIES: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: To describe optical coherence tomography characteristics of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) in age-related macular degeneration patients. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, observational case series of patients diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration and FTMHs seen between January 1, 2009, and January 3, 2020. Clinical charts and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images were reviewed. Optical coherence tomography findings included FTMH-inverted trapezoid or hourglass appearance, central macular thickness (CMT), complete retinal pigment epithelium and complete retinal outer retinal atrophy, and presence of pigment epithelium detachment and epiretinal membrane. The mean outcome was the morphologic and functional characterization of different subtypes of FTMHs. RESULTS: A total of 86 eyes of 85 consecutive patients, with mean age of 80.31 ± 8.06 and mean best-corrected visual acuity of 1.17 ± 0.58 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution. Two different subtypes of FTMHs were identified: tractional and degenerative. Fifty (58%) degenerative FTMHs characterized with inverted trapezoid appearance and 36 (42%) tractional FTMHs characterized with hourglass appearance. Degenerative FTMHs presented with 66% of CMT < 240 µm, 14% of CMT > 320, and 70% of complete retinal outer retinal atrophy, in comparison with 41% of CMT < 240 µm, 42.9% of CMT > 320%, and 20% of complete retinal outer retinal atrophy in the tractional FTMH group (P = 0.002, 0.003, <0.001, respectively). The presence of epiretinal membrane and pigment epithelium detachment where significantly higher in tractional FTMHs (P = 0.02, 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: Degenerative and tractional FTMHs may be two distinct clinical entities. Discerning degenerative from tractional FTMHs is possible by using optical coherence tomography features including shape of the FTMHs, CMT, internal-external ratio of FTMHs, and presence of complete retinal outer retinal atrophy, pigment epithelium detachment, and epiretinal membrane.

Relationship Between Optical Coherence Tomography Parameter and Visual Function in Eyes With Epiretinal Membrane.

Purpose: To investigate the associations between visual function and the optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods: Thirty-nine consecutive eyes with ERM were enrolled. In addition to OCT parameters, such as central retinal thickness (CRT), the area of gap between the ERM and the retinal surface (SUKIMA) was newly defined and calculated from the vertical and horizontal OCT images (SUKIMAv and SUKIMAh). The average of SUKIMAv and SUKIMAh (SUKIMAave) was used for the statistical analysis. The vertical and horizontal metamorphopsia scores (MV, MH) and the average of MV and MH (Mave) were also used for the analysis. Results: The Mave was not significantly associated with logMAR visual acuity (VA) (P = 0.57, linear regression analysis). Analysis using second-order bias-corrected Akaike information criterion model selection identified the age, CRT, and SUKIMAave as being associated with logMAR VA. On the other hand, among the OCT parameters, SUKIMAave and CRT were associated with the Mave. In addition, there was a significant relationship between SUKIMAh and MV (P = 0.011) and between SUKIMAv and MH (P = 0.0014). Conclusions: We identified SUKIMA as a novel OCT parameter that is useful to predict both VA and metamorphopsia in patients with ERM.

Spontaneous Conversion of Lamellar Macular Holes to Full-Thickness Macular Holes: Clinical Features and Surgical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients experiencing a spontaneous conversion of a lamellar macular hole (LMH) to a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with LMH who experienced a spontaneous conversion to FTMH and underwent FTMH surgery. METHODS: Clinical charts and OCT features of 20 eyes of 20 patients were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: OCT features and surgical outcomes of FTMH derived from LMH. RESULTS: The mean baseline visual acuity (VA) was 0.21 ± 0.19 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (20/32 Snellen equivalent [SE]). Epiretinal proliferation was noted in 18 eyes (90%), and 14 eyes (75%) had an epiretinal membrane. At the diagnosis of FTMH, the mean VA decreased to 0.61 ± 0.50 logMAR (20/81 SE) (P = 0.001). The mean FTMH diameter was 224.4 ± 194.8 µm, with 15 (75%) small (≤250 µm), 2 (10%) medium (>250-≤400 µm), and 3 (15%) large (>400 µm) FTMHs. Eighteen (90%) FTMHs were sealed after 1 surgery, and 2 (10%) required an additional procedure. At the last follow-up, the mean VA was increased to 0.29 ± 0.23 logMAR (20/38 SE) (P = 0.003), but did not significantly differ from the baseline VA (P = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LMH may develop an FTMH with no evidence of vitreomacular traction. A tangential traction from an epiretinal membrane may contribute to its genesis, but a progressive loss of retinal tissue and an inherent weakness of the foveal architecture in LMH eyes could be sufficient. Most FTMHs derived from LMH had a small diameter, showed epiretinal proliferation, showed limited retinal hydration, and were associated with relatively poor surgical outcomes compared with idiopathic FTMH.

PREOPERATIVE DOMED MACULAR CONTOUR CORRELATES WITH POSTOPERATIVE VISUAL GAIN AFTER VITRECTOMY FOR SYMPTOMATIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE.

PURPOSE: Evaluate macular features on preoperative ocular coherence tomography as indicators of postoperative visual gain following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 66 eyes that underwent vitrectomy with membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling for symptomatic ERM. Inclusion criteria required a pre-op visual acuity of at least 20/200 and minimum follow-up of 1 year. In addition, 31 of these eyes with complete 5-line raster pre-op ocular coherence tomography had segmentation analysis which included noncentral ERM to inner nuclear layer and ERM to outer plexiform layer measurements. RESULTS: Eyes with "domed" pre-op macular contour had a mean preoperative acuity of 20/70 and gained a mean 2.4 lines at one year, compared with those with "flat" or "depressed" macular contour, having a 20/60 mean preoperative acuity and 0.6 lines gained (P = 0.02). Changes for other ocular coherence tomography features examined were not statistically significant. Paracentral ERM to inner nuclear layer measurements had moderate correlation, whereas paracentral ERM to outer plexiform layer measurements had weak correlation with gain in visual acuity. CONCLUSION: An inner macular-domed contour in eyes with ERM predicted better visual gain after vitrectomy with ERM and internal limiting membrane peeling compared with a flat or depressed contour.

POSTOPERATIVE MOVEMENT OF THE FOVEA AFTER SUCCESSFUL SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in the fovea's postoperative location after successful pars plana vitrectomy with combined epiretinal and internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERMs). METHODS: In this prospective study 32 eyes of 32 patients with iERMs were followed from baseline before until 3 months after surgery. Study measures included 4-m Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity, enhanced-depth imaging-optical coherence tomography, and intraoperative fundus photographs. Foveal movement was assessed by measuring the change in the papillofoveal distance (∆PFD). RESULTS: Mean ∆PFD in the study eye was -124 µm (±138) and -272 µm (±213) one day and 3 months after surgery, respectively. Mean ∆PFD after 3 months was greater in the study than in the fellow eye (P < 0.001). ∆PFD at Month 3 did not correlate with the internal limiting membrane area peeled (P = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Foveal movement starts immediately after surgery and causes a statistically significant reduction in PFD after uneventful macular pucker surgery. ∆PFD correlates statistically significantly with baseline best-corrected visual acuity and baseline central retinal thickness. The internal limiting membrane peeling size had no significant effect on the amount of postoperative foveal dislocation.

Seven-Year Outcomes of Uveitic Macular Edema: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial and Follow-up Study Results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of uveitic macular edema (ME). DESIGN: Longitudinal follow-up of a cohort of participants in a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 248 eyes of 177 participants with uveitic ME enrolled in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial and Follow-up Study. METHODS: OCT measurements, taken at baseline and annually, were graded by reading center graders masked to clinical data. Macular edema was defined as a center macular thickness (CMT) ≥240 µm on time-domain OCT or time-domain OCT equivalent. Resolution of ME was defined as normalization of macular thickness on OCT. Relapse of ME was defined as increase in macular thickness to ≥240 µm in an eye that previously had resolution. Visual acuity was measured at each visit with logarithmic visual acuity charts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resolution and relapse of ME. Visual acuity. RESULTS: Among 227 eyes with ME followed ≥1 year, the cumulative percent of eyes with ME resolving at any point during 7 years was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89-97). Epiretinal membranes on OCT were associated with a lower likelihood of ME resolution (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-1.01; P = 0.05). Among 177 eyes with resolved ME, the cumulative percent with relapse within 7 years was 43% (95% CI, 32-51). Eyes in which ME resolved gained a mean of 6.24 letters (95% CI, 4.40-8.09; P < 0.001) compared with eyes that remained free from ME during the 1-year follow-up intervals, whereas eyes in which ME did not resolve experienced no gain in vision (mean change -1.30 letters; 95% CI, -2.70 to 0.09; P = 0.065), and eyes that developed ME during the year (incident or relapsed) experienced a mean loss of -8.65 letters (95% CI, -11.5 to -5.84, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Given sufficient time and treatment, nearly all uveitic ME resolves, but episodes of relapse were common. Visual acuity results were better among eyes with resolved ME, suggesting that control of inflammation and resolution of ME might be visually relevant treatment targets.

Intraretinal microvascular changes after ERM and ILM peeling using SSOCTA.

BACKGROUND: To prospectively investigate retinal vascular changes in patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling using swept source optical coherence tomography angiography (SSOCTA). METHODS: Consecutive patients were grouped based on ERM severity and followed using SSOCTA up to month 3 after surgical intervention. Superficial and deep foveal avascular zone (s/dFAZ) as well as foveal and parafoveal vessel density (VD) were correlated with ERM severity and visual acuity. Differences between groups were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between ERM severity and baseline sFAZ, dFAZ and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal subfield thickness (CST) and ΔCST (r = -0.52, r = -0.43, r = -0.42, r = 0.58, r = 0.39; all p<0.05). Vascular flow parameters did not correlate with age, peeling size, pseudophakia or CST, but correlated with intraretinal cysts presence. No associations of BCVA with any of the OCTA parameters across time were found. Significant differences between ERM severity groups 1 and 2 were found for sFAZ at baseline (p = 0.005) and at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.014), and for dFAZ at baseline (p = 0.017). Superficial foveal and parafoveal VD were not significantly different between groups (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly shows that ERM severity based on ERM staging has to be taken into account when undertaking studies in patients with idiopathic ERM using SSOCTA. Further, specific changes in the superficial and deep retinal vasculature in eyes undergoing ERM and ILM peeling were found. However, the clinical usefulness and prognostic value for post-surgical treatment BCVA of the SSOCTA-derived variables (sFAZ and dFAZ area, as well as foveal and parafoveal VD) used remains questionable.

Binocular Interference vs Diplopia in Patients With Epiretinal Membrane.

Importance: Patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) sometimes close 1 eye for improved vision, but associations have not been rigorously studied. Objective: To evaluate associations with monocular eye closure in patients with ERM, and to report binocular interference (closing 1 eye to improve visual quality). Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective medical record review of an adult strabismus clinic at a tertiary referral center. Patients with ERM referred from retina clinicians between June 2010 and October 2019 who completed the Adult Strabismus (AS)-20 questionnaire, including the question: "I cover or close one eye to see things better." Two groups were identified: (1) patients reporting eye closure sometimes or more, and (2) patients reporting no eye closure (as control patients). Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies of (1) central-peripheral rivalry (CPR)-type diplopia (dragged fovea diplopia); (2) binocular interference (monocular eye closure but no diplopia or strabismus); and (3) other, associated with monocular eye closure. Visual acuity, metamorphopsia, aniseikonia, and AS-20 quality of life domain scores (self-perception, interactions, reading function, and general function) compared between binocular interference, CPR-type diplopia, and control patients. Results: A total of 124 patients with ERM (58 of 124 were women [47%]; mean [SD] age, 70 [9] years) reported monocular eye closure. Associations were binocular interference in 36 (29%; 95% CI, 21%-38%), CPR-type diplopia in 34 (27%; 95% CI, 20%-36%), and other (primarily strabismus) in 54 (44%). Compared with control patients with ERM (n = 11), patients with ERM and binocular interference had worse quality of life on AS-20 reading function (95 vs 62; mean difference, 22 points; 95% CI, 7-27 points; P = .007) and general function (89 vs 68; mean difference, 23 points; 95% CI, 13-34 points; P = .01) domains. Compared with CPR-type diplopia, patients with binocular interference had poorer worst-eye visual acuity (median 0.50 vs 0.30 logMAR [20/63 vs 20/40]; mean difference, 0.13 logMAR; 95% CI, 0.00-0.25 logMAR [20/20 to 20/35]; P = .03), and a larger interocular difference (0.46 vs 0.19 logMAR [20/58 vs 20/30]; mean difference, 0.15 logMAR; 95% CI, 0.03-0.28 logMAR [20/21 to 20/38]; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: Study findings suggest that binocular interference, manifesting as monocular eye closure (without diplopia or strabismus), is a distinct entity affecting quality of life in patients with epiretinal membrane.