The efficacy of meniscus posterior root tears repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To report of efficacy repair treatment for meniscus posterior root tears repair. METHODS: We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles. Coleman Methodology Score was used for a quality assessment of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze for efficacy of MMPRTs repair. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies, 14 level III and 8 level IV, were included in this systematic review, with a total of 926 cases. Studies comparing repair with either meniscectomy or conservative treatment found greater improvement and slower progression of Kellgrene-Lawrence grade with meniscal repair. Decreased meniscus extrusion is beneficial to the prognosis of patients undergoing MMPRTs repair. As treatment efficacy, the Lysholm score increased 28.87 (P < 0.001), IKDC score increased 31.73. The overall pooled event rates of progression of K-L grade is 0.200. Difference of Lysholm score and IKDC score between repair and meniscectomy were 8.72 and 9.67. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical subjective score after MMPRT repair was significantly improved compared with the preoperative status. Considering the progression of joint K-L grade, it can prevent the progression of arthrosis to some extent, but not completely. Decreased meniscus extrusion is beneficial to the prognosis of patients undergoing MMPRTs repair. Based on these results, MMPRTs repair cloud result favorable outcomes.

Patient Satisfaction Is Equivalent Using Telemedicine Versus Office-Based Follow-up After Arthroscopic Meniscal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has increasingly been considered as a viable alternative to traditional office-based health care, including postoperative follow-up visits. The purpose of the present study was to determine if patient satisfaction with overall care is equivalent for telemedicine follow-up (i.e., synchronous face-to-face video) and office-based follow-up after arthroscopic meniscectomy and repair. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled from August 1, 2019, to March 1, 2020. Patients were included who were ≥18 years old, consented to isolated arthroscopic meniscal repair or meniscectomy, and were able to properly utilize telemedicine software on a computer, tablet, or smartphone with a built-in camera. Patient demographic data, including complication events and postoperative satisfaction data, were recorded and analyzed for significance. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 122 (81.3%) were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of patient demographics or satisfaction scores. Patient satisfaction with overall care was equivalent based on the results of two 1-sided t-test analysis for equivalence (9.77 ± 0.60 in the office-based group versus 9.79 ± 0.53 in the telemedicine group; p < 0.001). When patients were asked to indicate their preferred follow-up type with the options listed as the type they received versus an alternative, 58 patients (84.1%) in the office-based group preferred their received type of follow-up, whereas 42 (79.2%) in the telemedicine group preferred their received follow-up (p = 0.493). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that patient satisfaction with overall care is equivalent between telemedicine and office-based follow-up in the immediate postoperative period following an arthroscopic meniscal surgical procedure, and should be considered a reasonable alternative to the traditional in-office modality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Trends in knee arthroscopy utilization: a gap in knowledge translation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the longitudinal trends in knee arthroscopy utilization in relation to published negative randomized controlled trials, focusing on annual rates, patient demographics and associated 30-day post-operative complications. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology billing codes to identify arthroscopy cases between 2006 and 2016. 30-day post-operative complications were identified, and potential risk factors analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: 68,346 patients underwent knee arthroscopy, of which 47,446 (69.5%) represented partial meniscectomies. The annual procedural rate, as a proportion of all reported cases, increased significantly from 2006 (0.3%) to 2016 (1.6%; p < 0.001), along with a significant increase in average patient age (44.3 ± 15.5 to 48.4 ± 14.5; p < 0.001). Specifically focusing on the meniscectomy cohort, average patient age significantly increased from 47.9 ± 15.1 to 50.7 ± 13.5 (p = 0.001). The overall incidence of complications was 2.0% (n = 1333), with major complications in 0.9% (n = 639) and minor complications in 1.0% (n = 701). Common complications included a return to the operating room (0.5%), deep vein thrombosis/thrombophlebitis (0.4%), and superficial infection (0.2%). Operating time > 90 min, diabetes, steroid use, ASA class 2+, and dialysis-dependency were the predictors of overall complication rates. CONCLUSION: Despite the publication of negative trials and new clinical practice guidelines, knee arthroscopy utilization and average patient age continue to increase. Given the high utilization, even low adverse event rates equate to substantial numbers of patients with minor and major complications. The NSQIP data show a gap in knowledge translation to clinical practice and highlight the need for improved clinical guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cohort study; Level III.

Trends in the surgical treatment of meniscal tears in patients with and without concurrent anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Objectives: Meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine trends in meniscal repair and meniscectomy both in the presence and absence of ACL reconstruction (ACLR).Methods: The PearlDiver database (www.pearldiverinc.com, Fort Wayne, IN) was queried for surgical management of patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 29880, 29881), meniscus repair (29882, 29883), and ACLR (29888) from 2010 to 2015. Patient groups included meniscectomy alone, meniscus repair alone, meniscus repair followed by meniscectomy, ACLR with meniscus repair, and ACLR with meniscus repair followed by meniscectomy. Linear regression was performed to determine the significance of yearly trend across each procedure. Statistical analysis was performed with RStudio, Version 1.1.442 (RStudio Inc. Boston, MA) for α value of .05.Results: The incidence of isolated meniscectomies decreased from 32.5/10,000 to 28.3/10,000 across the study period (p = 0.0230), whereas the incidence of isolated meniscus repairs and all meniscus repairs remained unchanged (p = 0.3000, p = 0.1260). For patients undergoing concomitant meniscal repair and ACLR, the highest proportion of patients was in the age range 15-24 years old with 45.7% of patients being 15-19. Of the ACLR, 18.6% involved a concomitant meniscus repair, and 54.0% involved a concomitant meniscectomy. The risk of subsequent meniscectomy was less in patients undergoing meniscal repair with ACLR than in patients undergoing isolated meniscal repair (10.8% versus 12.4%; aOR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95, p = 0.0226).Conclusions: The highest rates of concurrent meniscal repair with ACLR are in the 15-24-year-old population. From 2010 to 2015, the rate of meniscectomy declined while that of isolated meniscal repairs, as well as meniscal repair with ACLR, remained stable. Patients undergoing meniscal repair with ACLR had lower rates of subsequent meniscectomy compared to patients undergoing isolated meniscal repair in the absence of ACL tear.Level of evidence: Level III.

National Trends of Meniscectomy and Meniscus Repair in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Meniscus surgeries are frequently performed in orthopaedics. However, their current status is not well known in many countries, including Korea. This study aimed to investigate the national trends of meniscus surgery in Korea. METHODS: Information from the national database was acquired through the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from 2010 to 2017. All cases coded as meniscectomy or meniscus repair were included. The total number and incidence of cases of meniscus surgery per 100,000 persons were determined, and the results were stratified by age and gender. The meniscus repair ratio for the total number of meniscus surgeries was evaluated. RESULTS: The total number and incidence of meniscectomy cases were 65,752 and 137, respectively, in 2010, which increased to 74,088 and 154, respectively, in 2017. The number of meniscectomies increased by 12.67% in 8 years. The total number and incidence of meniscus repair cases were 9,055 and 18, respectively, in 2010, which increased to 14,947 and 31 in 2017. The number of meniscus repairs increased by 65.04%. The meniscus repair ratio was 12.1% in 2010, which increased to 16.8% in 2017. The highest peak was noted for patients who underwent meniscus surgeries in their 50s and 60s. Meniscectomy was performed more frequently in women (57%) than in men (43%), whereas repair was performed more frequently in men (54%) than in women (46%) over the study period. CONCLUSION: The total number and incidence of meniscus surgeries increased from 2010 to 2017; the number and incidence of meniscus repair procedures increased more rapidly than those of meniscectomy, with the peak treatment age for both surgeries being in the 50s and 60s. The current study will contribute to understanding the epidemiology of meniscus surgery, its prevention, and cost-saving measures in Korea.

Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a valid measure of results after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Revision ACL reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes when compared with primary ACL reconstruction. Understanding positive and negative predictors of PROs will allow surgeons to modify and potentially improve outcome for patients. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to describe PROs after revision ACL reconstruction and test the hypothesis that patient- and technique-specific variables are associated with these outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled by 83 surgeons over 52 sites. Data included baseline demographics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated PRO instruments: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Marx Activity Rating Scale. Patients were followed up at 2 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Multivariate regression models were used to control for a variety of demographic and surgical factors to determine the positive and negative predictors of PRO scores at 2 years after revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1205 patients met the inclusion criteria and were successfully enrolled: 697 (58%) were male, with a median cohort age of 26 years. The median time since their most recent previous ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Two-year questionnaire follow-up was obtained from 989 patients (82%). The most significant positive predictors of 2-year IKDC scores were a high baseline IKDC score, high baseline Marx activity level, male sex, and having a longer time since the most recent previous ACL reconstruction, while negative predictors included having a lateral meniscectomy before the revision ACL reconstruction or having grade 3/4 chondrosis in either the trochlear groove or the medial tibial plateau at the time of the revision surgery. For KOOS, having a high baseline score and having a longer time between the most recent previous ACL reconstruction and revision surgery were significant positive predictors for having a better (ie, higher) 2-year KOOS, while having a lateral meniscectomy before the revision ACL reconstruction was a consistent predictor for having a significantly worse (ie, lower) 2-year KOOS. Statistically significant positive predictors for 2-year Marx activity levels included higher baseline Marx activity levels, younger age, male sex, and being a nonsmoker. Negative 2-year activity level predictors included having an allograft or a biologic enhancement at the time of revision surgery. CONCLUSION: PROs after revision ACL reconstruction are associated with a variety of patient- and surgeon-related variables. Understanding positive and negative predictors of PROs will allow surgeons to guide patient expectations as well as potentially improve outcomes.

Analysis of the trends in arthroscopic meniscectomy and meniscus repair procedures in France from 2005 to 2017.

INTRODUCTION: In 2008, the French National Authority for Health (HAS) recommended that "conservative" treatments be adopted for meniscal lesions. This recommendation and the lack of superiority of meniscectomy over non-operative treatment for meniscus degeneration have modified the treatment pathway. However, the impact of these findings on French clinical practice is not known. The objective of this study was to evaluate the change over time in the number of alternative surgical procedures (meniscectomy and meniscus repair) and regional variation in France using data from the French agency for information on hospital care (ATIH). HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the number of meniscectomy procedures will decrease, and the number of repair procedures will increase over time at various healthcare facilities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2017, the number of hospitalizations in the Medicine-Surgery-Obstetrics wards for meniscectomy (NFFC003 and NFCC004) or meniscus repair (NFEC001 and NFEC002) was evaluated overall and then based on whether the stay occurred in public or private sector hospitals in France. Data were extracted from the ATIH database and the findings were (1) related to French demographics during the period in question; (2) separated into public or private sector hospitals; (3) distributed into various regions in France and; (4) stratified by patient age. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2017, 1,564,461 meniscectomy and 63,142 meniscus repair procedures were done in France. Over this period in the entire country, the meniscectomy rate gradually decreased from 19.80/10,000 inhabitants in 2005 to 15.77/10,000 inhabitants in 2017 (21.4% reduction) (p<0.0001) while the meniscus repair rate increased from 0.42/10,000 inhabitants in 2005 to 1.36/10,000 inhabitants in 2017 (320% increase) (p<0.0001). The largest meniscectomy reduction effort occurred in private sector hospitals, going from 15.79 to 12.01/10,000 inhabitants in 12 years; the decrease was smaller in public hospitals (going from 4.01 to 3.77/10,000 inhabitants) (p<0.0001 in both cases). The change in the procedure ratio between private and public hospitals was asymmetric, with the meniscus repair/meniscectomy ratio clearly increasing more in public hospitals (4% to 12.6%) between 2005 and 2017 than in private hospitals (1.6% to 6.6%) (p<0.0001). We found large regional differences: regions in Eastern France had higher meniscectomy rates, while regions in Western France had higher meniscus repair rates. When the analysis of procedures between 2008 and 2017 was stratified by age, a similar increase in repair procedures was found in all age brackets. Conversely, the reduction in meniscectomy was most apparent before 40 years of age, and the number of meniscectomy procedures was stable after 60 years of age. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest there has been a significant shift in the surgical management of meniscal injuries towards more conservative treatments. But the large variations between regions in France is evidence of a continued disparity in clinical practices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study without control group.

Increased rates of knee arthroplasty and cost of patients with meniscal tears treated with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus non-operative management.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), one of the most common surgeries performed by orthopaedic surgeons, and the associated rate of progression to knee arthroplasty (KA) compared to patients treated non-operatively after diagnosis of meniscal tear. METHODS: Utilizing data mining software (PearlDiver, Colorado Springs, CO), a national insurance database of approximately 23.5 million orthopaedic patients was queried for patients diagnosed with a meniscal tear. Patients were classified by treatment: non-operative and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and were followed after initial diagnosis for cost and progression to knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: There were 176,407 subjects in the non-op group and 114,194 subjects in the arthroscopic partial meniscectomy group. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy generated more cost than non-operative ($3842.57 versus $411.05, P < 0.001). Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy demonstrated greater propensity to need future knee arthroplasty (11.4% at 676 days) than those treated non-operatively (9.5% at 402 days) (P < 0.001). Female patients demonstrated a higher rate of progression to knee arthroplasty in the arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and non-operative groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to non-operative treatment for meniscal tears, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is more expensive and does not appear to decrease the rate of progression to knee arthroplasty. Patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy yielded on average a delay of only 9 months (274 days) before undergoing knee arthroplasty. Female patients experienced a significantly higher rate of progression to knee arthroplasty. The authors recognize the limitations of this type of study including its retrospective nature, reliance upon accurate coding and billing information, and the inability to determine whether symptoms including mechanical locking played a role in the decision to perform an APM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Rates of knee arthroplasty within one-year of undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in England: temporal trends, regional and age-group variation in conversion rates.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) then subsequently receiving a knee arthroplasty within one or two years, with focus on patients over the age of 60 years and regional variation. METHODS: Patients undergoing APM in England over 20-years (01-April-1997 to 31-March 2017) were identified in the national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). The proportion of patients undergoing arthroplasty in the same knee within one or two years of APM was determined and trends were analysed over time nationally and by NHS Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) region. RESULTS: 806,195 APM patients were eligible for analysis with at least one-year of follow up and 746,630 with two-years. The odds of arthroplasty conversion within one year increased over the study period (odds ratio [OR] 3.10 within 1-year in 2014 vs 2000; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.75-3.50). For patients undergoing APM aged 60 years or older in 2015-16, 9.9% (1689/17,043; 95% CI 9.5-10.4) underwent arthroplasty within 1-year and, in 2014-15, 16.6% (3100/18,734; 95% CI 16.0-17.1) underwent arthroplasty within 2-years. There was greater than 10-fold variation by CCG. CONCLUSIONS: Over the study period, the proportion of patients undergoing arthroplasty within one-year of APM increased. In 2015-16, of patients aged 60 years or older who underwent APM, 10% subsequently underwent knee arthroplasty within one year (17% within two years in 2014-15) and there was a high level of regional variation in this outcome. The development and adoption of national treatment guidance is recommended to improve and standardise treatment selection.

Are Orthopaedic Surgeons Performing Fewer Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomies in Patients Greater Than 50 Years Old? A National Database Study.

PURPOSE: To report the trends in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for degenerative meniscal tears in a large private insurance database among patients older than 50 years. METHODS: The Humana database between 2007 and 2015 was queried for this study. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria with degenerative meniscal tears who underwent APMs were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, followed by Current Procedural Terminology codes. A linear regression analysis was performed with a significance level set at F < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 21,759 APMs were performed between 2007 and 2015 in patients older than 50 years. Normalized data for total yearly enrollment showed a significant increase in APMs performed from 2007 to 2010 (R2 = 0.986, P = .007). The average percentage increase per year from 2007 to 2010 was 18.59%. However, there was a significant decrease in APMs performed from 2010 to 2015 (R2 = 0.748, P = .026). The average percentage decrease per year from 2010 to 2015 was 7.74%. The percentage decrease overall from 2010 to 2015 was 71.68%. No difference in statistical significance was found when age was broken into 5-year age intervals. We found a significant difference in APM based on region (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of APMs in patients older than 50 years increased from 2007 until 2010. Since 2010, the rate of APMs in patients older than 50 years has significantly decreased. These trends are likely multifactorial. Regardless of cause, it appears that the orthopaedic surgery community is performing fewer APMs in this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective database epidemiological study.

A new scoring system for prediction of meniscal repair in traumatic meniscal tears.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, MRI has not been used to predict meniscus tear reparability. An attempt has been made in this study to predict meniscal reparability using MRI, and a new scoring system to help with the same has been developed and tested. METHODS: Thirty repaired menisci were compared with equal number of meniscectomy cases retrospectively. Various clinical and radiological (radiographs and MRI) characteristics like chronicity of tear, pattern of tear, etc, were tabulated. Based on their association with the outcome of repair or meniscectomy, odds ratio of each attribute were calculated. A scoring system-Ortho One PROMT Score (Prediction of Reparability of Meniscal Tears)-to predict meniscal repair was formulated. Using this score, meniscus surgery outcomes were prospectively predicted in 120 cases and results tabulated. RESULTS: The newly devised Ortho One PROMT score predicted medial meniscus repair with a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 93.2% and medial meniscectomy with a sensitivity of 93.2% and a specificity of 90.9%. It predicts lateral meniscus repair with a sensitivity of 69.2% of patients and lateral meniscectomy with a sensitivity of 78.8% of patients. CONCLUSION: Ortho One PROMT score is a useful scoring system to predict the outcomes of meniscus surgery preoperatively. It uses a combination of clinical and radiological (MRI and plain radiograph) characteristics. With this scoring system, both the surgeon and the patient are better prepared preoperatively regarding the outcome of a particular meniscus surgery. The scoring shall make day-to-day arthroscopic meniscus surgery less stressful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Contemporary Surgical Trends in the Management of Symptomatic Meniscal Tears among United States Military Servicemembers from 2010 to 2015.

The purpose of this investigation is to report on trends over time in the treatment of meniscal pathology among military orthopaedic surgeons, as well as to evaluate the impact of patient demographics and concomitant procedure on the type of meniscal procedure performed. We performed a retrospective analysis of all active-duty United States military servicemembers who underwent a meniscal procedure from 2010 to 2015 within the Military Health System. Patient demographics and surgical variables were extracted from the electronic medical record. Treatments were categorized by location and by type of intervention (i.e., repair or debridement). Chi-square and linear regression analyses were performed to identify temporal trends in meniscal procedures and factors that were correlated with the type of meniscal procedure performed. Out of 29,571 meniscal procedures analyzed, partial meniscectomy was performed in 81.3% (n = 24,343) of cases, meniscal repair in 20.3% (n = 6,073), and meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) in 0.7% (n = 206). The rates of debridement, repair, and concomitant surgeries did not demonstrate any significant temporal trends, whereas MAT demonstrated a significant decrease in overall utilization. Nearly two-thirds of all meniscal procedures were performed in the medial compartment. MAT occurred equally between the medial and lateral compartments. Lateral meniscal lesions demonstrated significantly higher rates of debridement. With each year of advancing age, there was a 3.7% increasing likelihood of meniscectomy and 6.5% decreasing likelihood of repair. Females were more likely to undergo meniscal repair than males. Patients in the military population were more likely to undergo meniscal repair compared with previously reported rates in the civilian population. In this physically active cohort of nearly 30,000 military patients, 1 in 5 meniscal tears were treated with meniscal repair. Meniscal repairs were performed at a higher rate for all age groups compared with previously reported rates in the civilian population. Further research is required to elucidate the causative factors behind these differences and the effect on postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : IV, cross-sectional study.

Adipose-to-muscle area ratio at the knee is superior to BMI in predicting post-operative outcome following arthroscopic meniscectomy.

PURPOSE: To determine if measurement of leg adipose tissue area by MRI is a better predictor of post-operative clinical outcome compared to body mass index (BMI) following arthroscopic meniscectomy. METHODS: Patients that underwent an arthroscopic partial meniscectomy between 2011 and 2016 were identified and a retrospective chart review was performed. Patients with additional knee pathology other than a meniscal tear with or without associated articular cartilage injury were excluded. Leg adipose tissue and muscle area measurements at the level of the knee joint were performed for patients on their preoperative axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study and adipose-to-muscle area ratio (AMR) was calculated. Correlations among AMR, BMI, and post-operative clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (32 females and 42 males) were included (mean age 50.0 years, std. dev. 12.3 years). 35 patients underwent a partial medial meniscectomy, 15 underwent a partial lateral meniscectomy, and 24 underwent both. Linear regression analysis showed that the AMR, compared to BMI, had a significantly stronger correlation to both mean post-operative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) across all 5 subscales (KOOS5) and Tegner Current score. Patients that had cartilage damage and concurrent chondroplasty tended to be older and have lower post-operative KOOS5 compared to those with no cartilage damage. AMR was also significantly correlated to age and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that compared to BMI, leg adiposity as determined by the ratio of adipose tissue to muscle area on axial MRI (AMR), is a stronger predictor of functional outcome following meniscectomy. This suggests a role of obesity in the progression of OA beyond the increased joint forces associated with increased BMI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Temporal trends and regional variation in the rate of arthroscopic knee surgery in England: analysis of over 1.7 million procedures between 1997 and 2017. Has practice changed in response to new evidence?

OBJECTIVES: We investigated trends and regional variation in the rate of arthroscopic knee surgery performed in England from 1997-1998 to 2016-2017. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of the national hospital episode statistics (HES) for England. METHODS: All hospital episodes for patients undergoing a knee arthroscopy between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 2017 were extracted from HES by procedure code. Age and sex-standardised rates of surgery were calculated using Office for National Statistic population data as the denominator. Trends in the rate of surgery were analysed by procedure both nationally and by Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG). RESULTS: A total of 1 088 872 arthroscopic partial meniscectomies (APMs), 326 600 diagnostic arthroscopies, 308 618 knee washouts and 252 885 chondroplasties were identified (1 759 467 hospital admissions; 1 447 142 patients). The rate of APM increased from a low of 51/100 000 population (95% CI 51 to 52) in 1997-1998 to a peak at 149/100 000 (95% CI 148 to 150) in 2013-2014; then, after 2014-2015, rates declined to 120/100 000 (95% CI 119 to 121) in 2016-2017. Rates of arthroscopic knee washout and diagnostic arthroscopy declined steadily from 50/100 000 (95% CI 49 to 50) and 47/100 000 (95% CI 46 to 47) respectively in 1997-1998, to 4.8/100 000 (95% CI 4.6 to 5.0) and 8.1/100 000 (95% CI 7.9 to 8.3) in 2016-2017. Rates of chondroplasty have increased from a low of 3.2/100 000 (95% CI 3.0 to 3.3) in 1997-1998 to 51/100 000 (95% CI 50.6 to 51.7) in 2016-2017. Substantial regional and age-group variation in practice was detected. In 2016-2017, between 11% (22/207) and 16% (34/207) of CCGs performed at least double the national average rate of each procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last 20 years, and likely in response to new evidence, rates of arthroscopic knee washout and diagnostic arthroscopy have declined by up to 90%. APM rates increased about 130% overall but have declined recently. Rates of chondroplasty increased about 15-fold. There is significant variation in practice, but the appropriate population intervention rate for these procedures remains unknown.

Medicare Accountable Care Organizations and Use of Potentially Low-Value Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) on the use of vertebroplasty and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, 2 procedures for which randomized controlled trials suggest similar outcomes to sham surgery and therefore may provide low value. Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs aim to improve quality and decrease health care spending. Reducing the use of potentially low-value procedures can accomplish both of these goals. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent potentially low-value orthopedic procedures (vertebroplasty and partial meniscectomy) and a control (hip fracture) from 2010 to 2015 using a 20% sample of national Medicare claims. We performed an interrupted time-series analysis using linear spline models to evaluate the count of each procedure per 1000 patients, stratified by ACO participation. RESULTS: We identified 76 256 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, 44 539 patients who underwent vertebroplasty, and 50 760 patients who underwent hip fracture admission. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy rates decreased, vertebroplasty rates remained stable, and hip fracture rates increased for both groups during the study period, with similar trends among ACO and non-ACO patients. After January 1, 2013, ACO and non-ACO populations had similar trends for vertebroplasty (ACO incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.15 [1.08-1.23] vs non-ACO IRR = 1.11 [1.05-1.16]), meniscectomy (ACO IRR = 1.06 [1.01-1.12] vs non-ACO IRR = 1.03 [0.99-1.07]), and hip fracture (ACO IRR = 1.08 [1.01-1.14] vs non-ACO IRR = 1.08 [1.03-1.13]). CONCLUSIONS: ACOs were not associated with a reduction in the frequency of vertebroplasty and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Epidemiological Evaluation of Meniscal Ramp Lesions in 3214 Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knees From the SANTI Study Group Database: A Risk Factor Analysis and Study of Secondary Meniscectomy Rates Following 769 Ramp Repairs.

BACKGROUND: Ramp lesions are characterized by disruption of the peripheral meniscocapsular attachments of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Ramp repair performed at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to improve knee biomechanics. PURPOSE: The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for ramp lesions among a large series of patients undergoing ACLR. Secondary objectives were to determine the reoperation rate for failure of ramp repair, defined by subsequent reoperations for partial medial meniscectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: All patients underwent transnotch posteromedial compartment evaluation of the knee during ACLR. Ramp repair was performed if a lesion was detected. Potentially important risk factors were analyzed for their association with ramp lesions. A secondary analysis of all patients who underwent ramp repair and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years was undertaken to determine the secondary partial meniscectomy rate for failed ramp repair. RESULTS: The overall incidence of ramp lesions in the study population was 23.9% (769 ramp lesions among 3214 patients). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of ramp lesions was significantly associated with the following risk factors: male sex, patients aged <30 years, revision ACLR, chronic injuries, preoperative side-to-side laxity >6 mm, and concomitant lateral meniscal tears. The secondary meniscectomy rate was 10.8% at a mean follow-up of 45.6 months (range, 24.2-66.2 months). Patients who underwent ACLR + anterolateral ligament reconstruction had a >2-fold reduction in the risk of reoperation for failure of ramp repair as compared with patients who underwent isolated ACLR (hazard ratio, 0.457; 95% CI, 0.226-0.864; P = .021). CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of ramp lesions among patients undergoing ACLR. The identification of important risk factors for ramp lesions should help raise an appropriate index of suspicion and prompt posteromedial compartment evaluation. The overall secondary partial meniscectomy rate after ramp repair is 10.8%. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction appears to confer a protective effect on the ramp repair performed at the time of ACLR and results in a significant reduction in secondary meniscectomy rates.

The Demographic and Geographic Trends of Meniscal Procedures in New York State: An Analysis of 649,470 Patients Over 13 years.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the geographic and demographic variations and time trends of different types of meniscal procedures in New York State to determine whether disparities exist in access to treatment. METHODS: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) outpatient database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent elective, primary knee arthroscopy between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2015, for 1 of the following diagnosis-related categories: Group 1, meniscectomy; Group 2, meniscal repair; and Group 3, meniscal allograft transplantation, with or without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The 3 groups of meniscal procedures were compared on geographic distribution, patient age, insurance, concomitant ACLR, and surgeon and hospital volume over the study period. RESULTS: A total of 649,470 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy between 2003 and 2015 were identified for analysis. Both meniscectomies and meniscal repairs had a scattered distribution throughout New York State, with allograft volume concentrated at urban academic hospitals. The majority of patients who underwent any meniscal procedure had private insurance, with Medicaid patients having the lowest rates of meniscal surgery. At high-volume hospitals, meniscal repairs and allografts are being performed with increasing frequency, especially in patients <25 years of age. Meniscal repairs are being performed concomitantly with ACLR with increasing frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Meniscal repairs and allografts are being performed at high-volume hospitals for privately insured patients with increasing frequency. Geographic access to these treatments, particularly allografts, is limited. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Disparities in the availability of advanced meniscal treatment require further investigation and understanding to improve access to care.

Adverse outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a study of 700 000 procedures in the national Hospital Episode Statistics database for England.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is one of the most common orthopaedic procedures worldwide. Clinical trial evidence published in the past 6 years, however, has raised questions about the effectiveness of the procedure in some patient groups. In view of concerns about potential overuse, we aimed to establish the true risk of serious complications after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. METHODS: We analysed national Hospital Episode Statistics data for all arthroscopic partial meniscectomies done in England between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 2017. Simultaneous or staged (within 6 months) bilateral cases were excluded. We identified complications occurring in the 90 days after the index procedure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of at least one serious complication within 90 days, which was defined as either myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, infection requiring surgery, fasciotomy, neurovascular injury, or death. Logistic regression modelling was used to identify factors associated with complications and, when possible, risk was compared with general population data. FINDINGS: During the study period 1 088 782 arthroscopic partial meniscectomies were done, 699 965 of which were eligible for analysis. Within 90 days, serious complications occurred in 2218 (0·317% [95% CI 0·304-0·330]) cases, including 546 pulmonary embolisms (0·078% [95% CI 0·072-0·085]) and 944 infections necessitating further surgery (0·135% [95% CI 0·126-0·144]). Increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1·247 per decade [95% CI 1·208-1·288) and modified Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted OR 1·860 per 10 units [95% CI 1·708-2·042]) were associated with an increased risk of serious complications. Female sex was associated with a reduced risk of serious complications (adjusted OR 0·640 [95% CI 0·580-0·705). The risk of mortality fell over time (adjusted OR 0·965 per year [95% CI 0·937-0·994]). Mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke occurred less frequently in the study cohort than in the general population. The risks of infection and pulmonary embolism did not change during the study, and were significantly higher in the study cohort than in the general population. For every 1390 (95% CI 1272-1532) fewer knee arthroscopies done, one pulmonary embolism could be prevented. For every 749 (95% CI 704-801) fewer procedures done, one native knee joint infection could be prevented. INTERPRETATION: Overall, the risk associated with undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was low. However, some rare but serious complications (including pulmonary embolism and infection) are associated with the procedure, and the risks have not fallen with time. In view of uncertainty about the effectiveness of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, an appreciation of relative risks is crucial for patients and clinicians. Our data provide a basis for decision making and consent. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research.

Race and Insurance Status Are Associated With Surgical Management of Isolated Meniscus Tears.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a population-level analysis to evaluate the effect of socioeconomic markers on the use of meniscus surgery in patients with meniscus tears. METHODS: We queried all hospital-based clinic visits from 2011 to 2014 in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database, which also contains all New York inpatient/outpatient visits. Patients with known prior knee surgery, meniscus tear before 2011, or other ligament injuries were excluded. The primary outcome was a meniscus procedure (meniscectomy or meniscus repair). Survival analysis was used to calculate the rate of meniscus surgery within 6 months. A multivariate model identified patient factors (age, sex, race, and payer) associated with surgical intervention. RESULTS: There were 32,012 patients identified who met the inclusion criteria. The rate of meniscus procedure within 6 months of diagnosis was 49.6%. Meniscectomy was performed in 98.8% of cases compared with 1.2% for meniscus repair. Rates of meniscus procedures were higher in patients who were older, male, and white, as well as those first diagnosed by a surgeon. The highest rates of meniscus procedures were in those with private, worker's compensation, or other insurance types. Multivariable analysis showed that female sex, non-white race, and public or self-pay insurance were independently associated with lower rates of meniscus surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest both insurance-based and race-based disparities regarding surgical treatment. Additionally, the strongest variable for surgical management was a meniscus tear being first diagnosed by a surgeon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of Evidence IV, retrospective case-control study.