Lung surveillance following colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasectomy: Utilization of clinicopathologic risk factors to guide strategy.

BACKGROUND: Appropriately selected patients clearly benefit from resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastases (PMs). However, there remains equipoise surrounding optimal chest surveillance strategies following pulmonary metastasectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors that may inform chest surveillance in this population. METHODS: Patients who underwent CRC pulmonary metastasectomy were identified from a single institution's prospectively maintained surgical database. Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics were collected. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of subsequent PM within 6 months of the index lung resection. Multivariate modeling was used to evaluate risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, of whom 52.3% (n = 103) developed subsequent PM, at a median of 9.51 months following the index metastasectomy. Patients with KRAS alterations (odds ratio [OR], 3.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.363-6.926; P = .007), TP53 alterations (OR, 3.109; 95% CI, 1.318-7.341; P = .010) were found to be at risk of PM diagnosis within 6 months of the index metastasectomy, while those with an APC alteration (OR, .218; 95% CI, 0.080-0.598; P = .003) were protected. Moreover, patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months of the initial PM diagnosis also were more likely to develop early lung recurrence (OR, 2.105; 95% CI, 0.971-4.563; P = .059). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with KRAS alterations, TP53 alterations, and no APC alterations developed early recurrence in the lung following pulmonary metastasectomy, as did those who received chemotherapy after their initial PM diagnosis. As such, these groups benefit from early lung imaging after metastasectomy, as chest surveillance protocols should be based on patient-centered clinicopathologic and genomic risk factors.

Impact of primary tumor resection and metastasectomy among gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases only on survival.

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations for primary tumor resection (PTR) with or without liver resection (LR) in the patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and isolated liver metastases, there are conflicting data for their impact on overall survival (OS). METHODS: 2320 patients with GEP-NETs and isolated liver metastases were identified from NCDB. Multiple imputations were used to accommodate missing data, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted to minimize bias. RESULTS: Patients with PTR had a greater OS than those without PTR (3-year rate of 88.6% vs. 69.9%, P < 0.001), which was preserved in the adjusted analysis (IPTW-adjusted HR = 0.387, 95% CI: 0.264-0.567; P < 0.001). Patients with LR had a greater OS than those without LR (3-year rate 87.7% vs. 75.2%, P = 0.003), which was also preserved in adjusted analysis (IPTW-adjusted HR = 0.450, 95% CI: 0.229-0.885; P = 0.021). Patients undergoing both PTR and LR had the greatest survival advantage than those with other surgical interventions (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Either PTR or LR is associated with improved survival for GEP-NET patients with isolated liver metastases. However, there remains significant selection bias in the current study, and caution should be exercised when selecting patients for resection.

Survival outcomes and surgical morbidity based on surgical approach to pulmonary metastasectomy in pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients with osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Thoracotomy is considered the standard surgical approach for the management of pulmonary metastases in osteosarcoma (OST). Several studies have identified the advantages of a thoracoscopic approach, however, the clinical significance of thoracotomy compared to thoracoscopy is yet to be evaluated in a randomized trial. AIMS: The primary aim was to determine the survival outcomes in OST patients based on surgical approach for pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) and secondary aim was to assess the post-operative morbidities of OST PM through various surgical approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single institution retrospective study to compare survival outcomes and surgical morbidity according to the surgical approach of the management of pulmonary metastases in patients with OST. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with OST underwent PM. Twenty-one patients were metastatic at diagnosis and underwent PM during primary treatment; nine had thoracotomy, six thoracoscopy, and six combined thoracoscopy with thoracotomy (CTT). Forty-three patients with first pulmonary relapse or progression underwent PM; 18 had thoracotomy, 16 thoracoscopy and nine CTT. There was no difference in survival between surgical approaches. There were significantly more postoperative morbidities associated with thoracotomy for initial PM (pain and postoperative chest tube placement), and for PM at first relapse (pneumothoraces, pain, Foley catheter use and prolonged hospitalizations). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that patients with OST pulmonary metastases have comparable poor outcomes despite varying surgical approaches for PM. There were significantly more postoperative morbidities associated with thoracotomy for PM. Surgical bias and other competing risks could not be assessed given the limitations of a retrospective study and may be addressed in a prospective trial evaluating surgical approach for PM in OST.

Prognostic Impact of Visceral Pleural Invasion in Resected Solitary Lung Metastases from Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary resection of metastases from gastric cancer is extremely rare because gastric cancer metastasis to the lungs or thoracic cavity occurs as multiple pulmonary metastases, carcinomatous lymphangitis, or carcinomatous pleurisy. Therefore, the significance of surgery for pulmonary metastasis of gastric cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for survival after the resection of pulmonary metastases from gastric cancer. METHODS: From 2007 to 2019, 13 patients with pulmonary metastasis of gastric cancer underwent metastasectomy. Surgical outcomes were analyzed to determine the prognostic factors for recurrence and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: All the patients underwent pulmonary resection for solitary metastases. At the median follow-up time of 45.6 months (range, 4.8-106.8 months), five patients experienced a recurrence of gastric cancer after metastasectomy. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 44.4%, and the 5-year OS rate after pulmonary resection was 45.3%. Univariate analysis revealed that visceral pleural invasion (VPI) was an unfavorable prognostic factor for both recurrence-free and OS. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary resection of solitary metastases from gastric cancer may be an effective therapeutic option to improve survival. VPI in gastric cancer metastasis is a negative prognostic factor.

Experience of Simultaneous Bilateral Open Surgery and VATS for Pulmonary Metastasectomy.

BACKGROUND: Resection is the current treatment of choice for resectable bilateral pulmonary metastases. This study aimed to compare the differences in outcomes between simultaneous bilateral open and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary metastasectomy. METHODS: Forty-three patients underwent pulmonary metastasectomy through one-stage bilateral open thoracotomy (n = 16) and VATS (n = 27) between 2011 and 2020. Perioperative and oncological data were analyzed. RESULTS: The predominant primary tumor histology in both groups was colorectal cancer. The operative time, blood loss, and pain score on postoperative day 1 (POD1) were higher in the open group (p < 0.001, 0.009, and 0.03, respectively). No significant differences in pain score on POD2 and POD3, postoperative length of stay, or complications were found. Notably, numbers of the resected metastatic lung nodules were significantly greater in the open group (median number: 9.5 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparable. The median RFS was 15 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-22) in the open group and 18 months (IQR, 8-47) in the VATS group. The median OS was 28 months (IQR, 14-44) and 29 months (IQR, 15-54) in the open group and VATS group, respectively. CONCLUSION: One-stage bilateral pulmonary metastasectomy is safe and reduces medical expenditures in selected patients regardless of surgical approach. Although the open group harbored a greater number of metastatic foci, perioperative and oncological outcomes were similar to that of the VATS group.

Outcome of Repeated Resection of Pulmonary Metastases for Renal Cell Cancer.

BACKGROUND: To date, many studies investigated results and prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) in renal cell cancer (RCC). However, reports concerning repeated resection for patients with recurrent pulmonary metastases (RPM) are limited. In this study, we analyzed safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for survival after PM focusing on RPM for RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical, operative, and follow-up data of patients who underwent PM or RPM for RCC in our institution were retrospectively collected and correlated with each other from January 2005 to December 2019. RESULTS: Altogether 154 oncological pulmonary resections in curative intention as PM or RPM were performed in 82 and 26 patients. Postoperative complications were similar in both groups (n = 22 [26.8%] vs. 4 [15.4%], p = 0.2). Zero mortality was documented up to the 30th postoperative day. RPM was not associated with decreased 5-year-survival compared with PM (66.2 vs. 57,9%, p = 0.5). Patients who underwent RPM for recurrent lung metastases had a better overall survival in comparison with the other treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and best supportive care (p = 0.04). In the multivariate analysis, disease-free survival was identified as an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio: 0.969, 0.941-0.999, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: RPM is a safe and feasible procedure. The resection of recurrent lung metastases shows to prolong survival in comparison with the other therapeutic options for selected patients with RCC.

Long-term survival after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with lung metastasis.

OBJECTIVES: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis has a poor prognosis, and the only treatment modality is systemic therapy such as chemotherapy. Previous studies showed that pulmonary metastasectomy may provide benefits and has been suggested in selected patients with colorectal cancer, renal cancer, and sarcoma. However, there were few literatures evaluating the impact and treatment outcome of pulmonary metastasectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with isolated lung metastases. Therefore, we conducted this study. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis. Patients with extrapulmonary metastasis were excluded. We categorized them into two groups - the pulmonary resection group and the systemic treatment only group. We compared the overall survival and progression-free survival between groups, and also analyzed the surgical modality, which includes single or multiple port surgery. RESULTS: The analysis included 44 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with lung metastasis. Among these 44 patients, 14 patients have received pulmonary metastasectomy, and 30 patients received systemic treatment only. Patients who received pulmonary metastasectomy had significantly better overall survival (p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (p = 0.038) than those who received only systemic treatment. The one-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 100% and 48% in patients receiving pulmonary metastatectomy, and 49% and 33% in patients receiving only systemic treatment. Among 14 patients receiving pulmonary metastatectomy, 10 patients underwent single port surgery. There were no postoperative complications in these 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with lung metastasis who can receive pulmonary metastasectomy have better prognosis, and some patients can achieve long-term survival. Our findings suggest that aggressive pulmonary metastasectomy is suggested in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with if no contraindication. Key question: How about the role of pulmonary metastasectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with isolated lung metastasis? KEY FINDINGS: Patients who received pulmonary metastasectomy had better overall survival and progression-free survival than those who received only systemic treatment. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Esophageal cancer with isolated pulmonary metastasis can be treated aggressively with pulmonary metastasectomy if no contraindication.

Metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma: where are we now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Metastatic RCC has a variable natural history. Treatment choice depends on disease and patient factors, but most importantly disease burden and site of metastasis. This article highlights key variables to consider when contemplating metastasectomy for RCC and provide a narrative review on the evidence for metastasectomy in these patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Tumour subtype is associated with differing patterns of recurrence. Patients with single or few metastatic sites have better outcomes, and those with greater time interval from initial nephrectomy. Local recurrence is particularly amenable to minimally invasive surgical resection and is oncologically sound. Very well selected cases of liver or brain metastases may benefit from metastectomy, although lung and endocrine metastases have more favourable outcomes. Although site and burden of disease is important, the key determinate of outcome in metastasectomy depends mostly on the ability to achieve a complete resection. Adjuvant treatment is not currently advocated. SUMMARY: Metastasectomy should be generally reserved for cases where complete resection is achievable, unless the goal of treatment is to palliate symptoms. This field warrants ongoing research, particularly as systemic therapy and minimally invasive surgical techniques evolve. Elucidating tumour biology to inform patient selection will be important in future research.

Optimal timing for lung metastasectomy in patients with colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The possibility of occult metastasis remains a concern when deciding on lung metastasectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of our two-step determination, which required confirmation that no new metastases had occurred over 3 months before surgery. METHODS: Patients who were referred for colorectal lung metastases between 2007 and 2015 were reviewed. Immediate wedge resection was performed for cases with a single peripheral metastasis, whereas surgical indications for others were determined by the two-step determination. Early increase was defined as the emergence of new metastases within 4 months after the diagnosis of lung metastases. RESULTS: Among 369 patients included, 92 were unresectable upon initial diagnosis, and 74 with single peripheral metastasis underwent immediate wedge resection. Surgical indications for the remaining 203 patients were ascertained based on the two-step determination. Surgery was not indicated in 48 patients (24%) due to new metastases or a favourable response to chemotherapy, with a median waiting duration of 4.8 months. Those who did not receive surgery had a worse prognosis than those who did (5-year overall survival: 21% vs 69%, P < 0.001) and were comparable to the initially unresectable group (5-year overall survival: 23%). Thirty-eight patients with early increase had lower surgical resection rates and worse prognoses than those without. Multivariable analysis identified early increase as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 4.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with colorectal lung metastasis who developed new metastasis during the waiting period exhibited poor prognosis, suggesting the utility of the two-step determination of surgical indications.

Impact of Surgery and Chemotherapy on Metastatic Extrauterine Leiomyosarcoma.

Background: Few studies have described the characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with metastatic extrauterine leiomyosarcoma (euLMS). Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological features, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of patients with euLMS. Methods: We recruited 61 patients with metastatic euLMS treated from 2006 to 2020 and collected and statistically analyzed information on patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors. The median follow-up period was 21.1 months. Results: Sixty-one patients with euLMS and a median age of 59 years were included. Furthermore, their five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 38.3%. Univariate analysis revealed that primary tumor size >10 cm, synchronous metastasis, initial metastatic sites >1, and no metastasectomy with curative intent were significantly associated with poor OS rate. Multivariate analysis identified primary tumor size >10 cm as an independent prognostic factor for poor OS. Among 24 patients who received metastasectomy with curative intent, the interval from the initial diagnosis to development of metastasis ≤6 months was significantly correlated with unfavorable OS. Among 37 patients who did not receive metastasectomy, chemotherapy after metastasis development was significantly related to better OS. Conclusions: Complete metastasectomy should be considered for metastatic euLMS treatment. Moreover, chemotherapy could prolong survival in patients with metastasis who are ineligible for metastasectomy.

Impact of Intraoperative Molecular Imaging after Fluorescent-Guided Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) has been shown to improve lesion detection during pulmonary sarcomatous metastasectomy. Our goal in this study was to evaluate whether data garnered from IMI-guided resection of pulmonary sarcoma metastasis translate to improved patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-two of 65 consecutive patients with a previous history of sarcomas found to have pulmonary nodules during screening were enrolled in a nonrandomized clinical trial. Patients underwent TumorGlow the day before surgery. Data on patient demographics, tumor biologic characteristics, preoperative assessment, and survival were included in the study analysis and compared with institutional historical data of patients who underwent metastasectomy without IMI. p values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: IMI detected 42 additional lesions in 31 patients (59%) compared with the non-IMI cohort where 25% percent of patients had additional lesions detected using tactile and visual feedback only (p < 0.05). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with IMI-guided pulmonary sarcoma metastasectomy was 36 months vs 28.6 months in the historical cohort (p < 0.05). IMI-guided pulmonary sarcoma metastasectomy had recurrence in the lung with a median time of 18 months compared with non-IMI group at 13 months (p < 0.05). Patients with synchronous lesions in the IMI group underwent systemic therapy at a statistically higher rate and tended to undergo routine screening at shorter interval. CONCLUSIONS: IMI identifies a subset of sarcoma patients during pulmonary metastasectomy who have aggressive disease and informs the medical oncologist to pursue more aggressive systemic therapy. In this setting, IMI can serve both as a diagnostic and prognostic tool without conferring additional risk to the patient.

Survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for relapsed osteosarcoma.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postrelapse survival of relapsed osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastases in patients who received pulmonary metastasectomy using intent to treat and propensity score analysis. METHODS: Patients with osteosarcoma who relapsed with pulmonary metastases between 2004 and 2018 who were treated in a hospital affiliated with a medical school were included. All the enrolled patients were evaluated as operable with assessment algorithm at the time of diagnosis of pulmonary relapse and intent to treat analysis was done. Multiple propensity score methods (eg, matching, stratification, covariate adjustment, and inverse probability of treatment weighting) were performed to balance confounding bias. Cox proportional hazards regression and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate patient survival. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients met the study criteria. Of these, 59 (47.2%) patients received pulmonary metastasectomy combined with chemotherapy and 66 (52.8%) received chemotherapy alone. The 2-year and 5-year postrelapse survival rate of metastasectomy group and nonmetastasectomy group were 68.4% versus 25.0% and 41.0% versus 0%, respectively. The median postrelapse survival was 24.9 versus 13.5 months, respectively. Pulmonary metastasectomy was independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.185; 95% confidence interval, 0.103-0.330; P < .001). These results were confirmed by multiple propensity score analyses. Further stratified analysis revealed that the survival advantage associated with metastasectomy was not significant in patients with metastases involving ≥3 lung lobes and patients with very high pretreatment serum alkaline phosphatase (more than twice the upper limit). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary metastasectomy is associated with improved survival in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma.

Impact of Intraoperative Blood Loss and Blood Transfusion on the Prognosis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis Following Curative Resection.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The identification of risk factors for recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastasis is necessary in order to establish a more effective treatment strategy. In addition to well-known prognostic factors, such as the tumor diameter and number of metastatic tumors, a large amount of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and blood transfusion have recently been reported to be associated with shorter long-term survival. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of IBL and blood transfusion on the prognosis of colorectal liver metastasis after curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients who underwent R0 resection for colorectal liver metastasis were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The high-IBL (>300 ml) group had significantly shorter relapse-free survival after hepatic resection in comparison to the low-IBL (≤300 ml) group (p=0.0025). Patients with blood transfusion had significantly shorter relapse-free survival after hepatic resection in comparison to patients without blood transfusion (p=0.0026). CONCLUSION: A large amount of IBL and blood transfusion may have a negative impact on long-term survival in patients who undergo hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for adrenal gland metastases: outcome and predictive factors from a multicenter analysis.

Adrenal metastases occur in 15-35% of oncological patients. Surgery is the first treatment option. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been largely explored in oligometastatic patients unfit for surgery, representing an effective and non-invasive local treatment. The results of a multi-institutional experience of SBRT on adrenal metastases in the oligorecurrent or oligoprogressive setting are herein reported. We collected data of adrenal gland metastases treated with SBRT in three Italian centers from 2010 to 2020. End-points of the present study were: Overall survival (OS), Local control of treated metastases (LC), Progression free survival (PFS), and toxicity. 149 adrenal gland metastases were treated with SBRT in 142 patients. The most common primary tumor was lung cancer (58.4%), followed by kidney cancer (9.4%). Median lesion's volume was 28.5 cm3 (2.5-323.4). The median SBRT dose was 40 Gy (10-60). Median follow-up was 14.4 months. One- and two-year OS were 72.3% and 53.5%. At univariate analysis performance status correlated with survival (HR 1.57, p = 0.006). One- and two-year LC were 85.4% and 79.2%, with lung primary tumor (HR 0.33, p = 0.021) and BED10 (HR 0.97, p = 0.036) significant independent factors. One- and two-year PFS were 37.7% and 24.8%. Median time to polymetastatic disease was 11.3 months. Grade 1 and 2 toxicity occurred in 21 (14.7%) and 3 (2.1%) patients. The results from this large multi-center study confirm the efficacy and safety of SBRT in the management of adrenal gland metastases, as a valid alternative to other more invasive local approaches.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in bone and soft tissue sarcoma with metastasis to the lung.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the outcomes of sarcoma patients with lung metastases who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy (PM), compared to patients who underwent medical management alone. The secondary objective was to compare survival after PM between variables of interest. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 565 sarcoma patients with confirmed, isolated pulmonary metastasis identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. 1:4 propensity score matching was used to select PM and non-PM groups. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse prognostic factors of disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Of the eligible 565 patients, 59 PM patients were matched to 202 non-PM patients in a final ratio of 3.4. After propensity matching, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between PM and non-PM patients. The median DFS after PM was 32 months (interquartile range 18-59), compared to 20 months (interquartile range 7-40) in patients without PM (P = 0.032). Using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, metastasectomy (hazard ratio 0.536, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.85; P = 0.008) was associated with improved DFS. In a subset analysis of patients who underwent PM only, the median DFS was longer in males compared to females (P = 0.021), as well as in bone sarcoma compared to soft tissue sarcoma (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: For sarcoma patients with metastatic lung disease, PM appears to improve the prognosis compared to medical management. Furthermore, there may be a survival association with gender and tumour origin in patients who underwent PM. These data may be used to inform the surgical indications and eligibility criteria for metastasectomy in this setting.

The evolving role of neurosurgery for central nervous system metastases in the era of personalized cancer therapy.

Recent therapeutic advances involving the use of systemic targeted treatments and immunotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced cancers have translated into improved survival rates. Despite the emergence of such promising pharmacological therapies and extended survival, the frequency of metastases in the central nervous system has steadily increased. Effective medical and surgical therapies are available for many patients with brain metastases and need to be incorporated into multi-disciplinary care protocols. The role of neurosurgeons is evolving within these multi-disciplinary care teams. Surgical resection of brain metastases can provide immediate relief from neurological symptoms due to large lesions and provides the histopathological diagnosis in cases of no known primary malignancy. In situations where immunotherapy is part of the oncological treatment plan, surgery may be proposed for expeditious relief of edema to remove the need for steroids. In patients with multiple brain metastases and mixed response to therapeutics or radiosurgery, tumour resampling allows tissue analysis for druggable targets or to distinguish radiation effects from progression. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting may improve quality of life in patients with hydrocephalus associated with leptomeningeal tumour dissemination and may allow for time to administer more therapy thus prolonging overall survival. Addressing the limited efficacy of many oncological drugs for brain metastases due to insufficient blood-brain barrier penetrance, clinical trial protocols in which surgical specimens are analysed after pre-surgical administration of therapeutics offer pharmacodynamic insights. Comprehensive neurosurgical assessment remains an integral element of multi-disciplinary oncological care of patients with brain metastases and is integral to tumour biology research and therapeutic advancement.

Assessment of Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic and Open Liver Surgery.

Importance: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure that captures the most desirable surgical outcomes as a single indicator, yet to date TO has not been defined and assessed in the field of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR). Objective: To obtain international agreement on the definition of TO in liver surgery (TOLS) and to assess the incidence of TO in LLR and OLR in a large international multicenter database using a propensity-score matched analysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for all liver diseases between January 2011 and October 2019 were analyzed using a large international multicenter liver surgical database. An international survey was conducted among all members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) to reach agreement on the definition of TOLS. The rate of TOLS was assessed for LLR and OLR before and after propensity-score matching. Factors associated with achieving TOLS were investigated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Textbook outcome, with TOLS defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents of grade 2 or higher, postoperative bile leak grade B or C, severe postoperative complications, readmission within 30 days after discharge, in-hospital mortality, and the presence of R0 resection margin. Results: A total of 8188 patients (4559 LLR; median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 55-73 years]; 2529 were male [55.8%] and 3629 OLR; median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 56-71 years]; 2204 were male [60.7%]) were included in the analysis of whom 69.1% achieved TOLS; 74.8% for LLR and 61.9% for OLR (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III, previous abdominal surgery, histological diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases (odds ratio [OR], 0.656 [95% CI, 0.457-0.940]; P = .02), cholangiocarcinoma, non-CRLM, a tumor size of 30 mm or more, minor resection of posterior/superior segments (OR, 0.716 [95% CI, 0.577-0.887]; P = .002), anatomically major resection (OR, 0.579 [95% CI, 0.418-0.803]; P = .001), and nonanatomical resection (OR, 0.612 [95% CI, 0.476-0.788]; P < .001) were associated with a worse TOLS rate after LLR. For OLR, only histological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (OR, 0.360 [95% CI, 0.214-0.607]; P < .001) and a tumor size of 30 mm or more (30-50 mm = OR, 0.718 [95% CI, 0.565-0.911]; P = .01; 50.1-100 mm = OR, 0.729 [95% CI, 0.554-0.960]; P = .02; >10 cm = OR, 0.550 [95% CI, 0.366-0.826]; P = .004) were associated with a worse TOLS rate. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter study, TOLS was found to be a useful tool for assessing patient-level hospital performance and may have utility in optimizing patient outcomes after LLR and OLR.