Inhaled methoxyflurane - an explorable alternative to nitrous oxide?

Nitrous oxide is a widely used and well-established form of inhalation sedation in dentistry. Its properties have a wide margin of safety and allow for anxious, paediatric and adult patients to receive dental treatment with minimal impact upon discharge. Nitrous oxide has drawbacks, however, including its environmental impact and need for specialist equipment. Methoxyflurane is another drug which could prove to be an alternative to nitrous oxide. Methoxyflurane's use has proved popular within emergency medicine in Australia and New Zealand for its potent analgesic effects and recognition of its anxiolytic effect. As a result, its use in invasive outpatient procedures has now become popular. Unfortunately, there is very limited evidence of its use within dentistry as a form of inhalation sedation and analgesic. A wider evidence base should be established, as methoxyflurane could prove to be an effective and environmentally friendly alternative to nitrous oxide.

Environmental impact of low-dose methoxyflurane versus nitrous oxide for analgesia: how green is the 'green whistle'?

BACKGROUND: The NHS has the target of reducing its carbon emission by 80% by 2032. Part of its strategy is using pharmaceuticals with a less harmful impact on the environment. Nitrous oxide is currently used widely within the NHS. Nitrous oxide, if released into the atmosphere, has a significant environmental impact. Methoxyflurane, delivered through the Penthrox 'green whistle' device, is a short-acting analgesic and is thought to have a smaller environmental impact compared with nitrous oxide. METHODS: Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of all products and processes involved in the manufacture and use of Penthrox, using data from the manufacturer, online sources and LCIA inventory Ecoinvent. These data were analysed in OpenLCA. Impact data were compared with existing data on nitrous oxide and morphine sulfate. RESULTS: This LCIA found that Penthrox has a climate change effect of 0.84 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). Raw materials and the production process contributed to majority of the impact of Penthrox across all categories with raw materials accounting for 34.40% of the total climate change impact. Penthrox has a climate change impact of 117.7 times less CO2e compared with Entonox. 7 mg of 100 mg/100 mL of intravenous morphine sulfate had a climate change effect of 0.01 kg CO2e. CONCLUSIONS: This LCIA has shown that the overall 'cradle-to-grave' environmental impact of Penthrox device is better than nitrous oxide when looking specifically at climate change impact. The climate change impact for an equivalent dose of intravenous morphine was even lower. Switching to the use of inhaled methoxyflurane instead of using nitrous oxide in certain clinical situations could help the NHS to reach its carbon emission reduction target.

Pain Self-Management with Inhaled Methoxyflurane by Emergency Department Trauma Patients: A Prospective, Interventional, Single-Center Study.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to overcrowding in many emergency departments (EDs). The present single-center, prospective, interventional study (conducted at Bichat University Medical Center (Paris, France)) was designed to assess the impact of self-administered, inhaled, low-dose methoxyflurane on trauma pain in a pre-ED fast-track zone dedicated to the management of lower-acuity non-COVID-19 patients. In the first phase of the study, the control group consisted of patients with mild-to-moderate trauma pain, for whom the triage nurse initiated pain management (based on the World Health Organization (WHO)'s analgesic ladder). In the second phase, the intervention group consisted of similar patients who self-administered methoxyflurane as an adjuvant to the standard analgesic ladder. The primary endpoint was the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) score (from 0 to 10) recorded at different time points during the patient's care (T0: arrival in the ED, T1: exit from the triage box, T2: in the radiology department, T3: clinical examination, and T4: discharge from the ED). The level of agreement between the NPRS and the WHO analgesic ladder was assessed by the calculation of Cohen's kappa. Pairwise comparisons of continuous variables were performed with Student's t-test or a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Changes over time in the NPRS were analyzed in an analysis of variance (with Scheffe's post hoc test if a pairwise comparison was significant) or a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis H test. In all, 268 and 252 patients were included in the control and intervention groups, respectively. The two groups had similar characteristics. The level of agreement between the NPRS score and the analgesic ladder was high in both the control and intervention groups (Cohen's kappa: 0.74 and 0.70, respectively). The NPRS score decreased significantly between T0 and T4 in both groups (p < 0.001), but the decrease between T2 and T4 was significantly greater in the intervention group (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients still in pain on discharge was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (p = 0.001). In conclusion, a combination of self-administered methoxyflurane and the WHO analgesic ladder improves pain management in the ED.

Use of ketamine wafer for pain management by volunteer emergency medical technicians in rural Western Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of sublingual ketamine wafers administered by volunteer emergency medical technicians (EMTs) for pain management to patients in rural Western Australia (WA). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients older than 12 years who were attended by volunteer EMTs in Esperance, Lancelin and Kalbarri, WA and received analgesic medications from 2018 to 2021. Patients who received ketamine wafers with/without other analgesics were compared to (i) patients who received only oral paracetamol and (ii) patients who received inhalational methoxyflurane without ketamine wafers with/without paracetamol. RESULTS: The present study included 826 patients, among whom 149 patients received ketamine wafer with/without other analgesics, 82 paracetamol only and 595 methoxyflurane with/without paracetamol. Patients who received ketamine wafers were younger (median age 49 years vs 54 years for the paracetamol group vs 58 years for the methoxyflurane group), required a longer median transport interval (56 min vs 20 min vs 8 min), trauma-related (73% vs 35% vs 54%), and presented higher median initial pain score (9 vs 3 vs 8 out of 10) than those who received paracetamol and those who received methoxyflurane, respectively. Eight in the ketamine wafers group (5.4%) had a record of nausea/vomiting after the administration of ketamine wafers. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual ketamine wafer was administered by volunteer EMTs without any evidence of major adverse events in rural WA and deemed useful as an additional pain management option when long transport to hospital was needed. No other symptoms that may be associated with the use of ketamine were recorded.

Literature review on the use of methoxyflurane in the management of pain in cancer-related procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Self-administered methoxyflurane, also known as Penthrox, at a sub-anesthetic dose is a short-term, fast-acting, and safe analgesic that may provide suitable pain relief for cancer patients. This review aims to compile the existing evidence on methoxyflurane and its efficacy in reducing pain during cancer-related procedures. METHODS: A literature search was conducted through OVID Medline and Embase. The search was limited to articles published between 2012 and 2021 and studies were included if they assessed the efficacy of methoxyflurane to reduce pain in cancer-related procedures. All types of cancer were included. RESULTS: The literature search yielded seven studies published between 2012 and 2021. The studies analyzed assessed methoxyflurane use in prostate biopsy, colonoscopy, removal of brachytherapy rods, and bone marrow biopsy. Various research designs were employed, including three randomized controlled trials, two prospective observational studies, one retrospective, and one non-randomized controlled trial. In all, methoxyflurane has a demonstrated ability to reduce pain in these procedures. CONCLUSION: In the limited studies available in evaluating the efficacy of methoxyflurane for reducing procedural pain during cancer-related procedures, all have demonstrated clinical equivalency or superiority. Pain relief appears to be equivalent however methoxyflurane overcomes the standard limitations of respiratory sedation and has demonstrated quicker procedural recovery times than traditional sedation methods. The accumulated data to date supports the use of methoxyflurane which can supplement or supplant current methods of analgesia in cancer-related procedures.

How I Do It: Penthrox in Urology.

Penthrox is a portable handheld inhaler that delivers a low dose of methoxyflurane - an anesthetic with analgesic effects, rapid onset of action, and a favorable side-effect profile. It has been widely used for acute pain management in Australia for the past 40 years. Currently, it is approved for use in over 55 countries, including Canada. Prospective randomized studies highlight Penthrox analgesic effectiveness and safety profile for emergency, prehospital and outpatient settings. In addition, the use of multimodal analgesia, specifically Penthrox, can play an important role in the analgesic management of urological procedures, such as prostatic biopsies and office-based minimally invasive surgical therapies. Herein readers will familiarize themselves with Penthrox, significant studies, and technique used for outpatient urological procedures.

Penthrox enables quicker management of fractures, dislocations and more: learning lessons from expedited care of trauma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Methoxyflurane is an historical anaesthetic agent that has undergone a renaissance with the introduction of a smaller dose in a handheld 'Penthrox' device. The benefits of Penthrox include its ease of use, with disposable individual packets, and the need for less monitoring and staff, when compared with deeper sedation. The literature acknowledges its use for analgesia and in the management of anterior shoulder dislocation but in no other procedural orthopaedic circumstance. METHODS: Following institutional approval, we undertook a retrospective review of all incidences of Penthrox use to facilitate minor procedures within a 2-month period starting 24 March 2020. Time to procedure and success were recorded using the surrogate markers of patient attendance and x-Ray occurrence times. RESULTS: Some 101 Penthrox doses were given to 89 patients over 97 unique episodes between 24 March and 26 May 2020. No complications were recorded following the use of Penthrox during this period. Patient demographics were explored. Fracture manipulations and casting (n=54) had a 100% success rate in achieving adequate and safe reduction. Joint dislocations (n=34) were treated with varying success. Native elbow dislocations were reduced most successfully (4/4, 100%). Native shoulder dislocations were seen in 17 patients and successful relocation was seen in 11 cases, giving a success rate of 65%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, outside anterior shoulder dislocations, to report on the efficacy of Penthrox within emergent orthopaedic scenarios. We have demonstrated Penthrox to be a safe tool for helping to manage trauma procedures in the emergency department.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of inhaled methoxyflurane versus usual analgesia for prehospital injury and trauma: non-randomised clinical study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate clinical benefits and economic costs of inhaled methoxyflurane when used by ambulance staff for prehospital emergency patients with trauma. Comparison is to usual analgesic practice (UAP) in the UK in which patient records were selected if treatment had been with Entonox® or intravenous morphine or intravenous paracetamol. METHODS: Over a 12-month evaluation period, verbal numerical pain scores (VNPS) were gathered from adults with moderate to severe trauma pain attended by ambulance staff trained in administering and supplied with methoxyflurane. Control VNPS were obtained from ambulance database records of UAP in similar patients for the same period. Statistical modelling enabled comparisons of methoxyflurane to UAP, where we employed an Ordered Probit panel regression model for pain, linked by observational rules to VNPS. RESULTS: Overall, 96 trained paramedics and technicians from the East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust (EMAS) prepared 510 doses of methoxyflurane for administration to a total of 483 patients. Comparison data extracted from the EMAS database of UAP episodes involved: 753 patients using Entonox®, 802 patients using intravenous morphine, and 278 patients using intravenous paracetamol. Modelling results included demonstration of faster pain relief with inhaled methoxyflurane (all p-values < 0.001). Methoxyflurane's time to achieve maximum pain relief was estimated to be significantly shorter: 26.4 min (95%CI 25.0-27.8) versus Entonox® 44.4 min (95%CI 39.5-49.3); 26.5 min (95%CI 25.0-27.9) versus intravenous morphine 41.8 min (95%CI 38.9-44.7); 26.5 min (95%CI 25.1-28.0) versus intravenous paracetamol 40.8 (95%CI 34.7-46.9). Scenario analyses showed that durations spent in severe pain were significantly less for methoxyflurane. Costing scenarios showed the added benefits of methoxyflurane were achieved at higher cost, eg versus Entonox® the additional cost per treated patient was estimated to be £12.30. CONCLUSION: When administered to adults with moderate or severe pain due to trauma inhaled methoxyflurane reduced pain more rapidly and to a greater extent than Entonox® and parenteral analgesics. Inclusion of inhaled methoxyflurane to the suite of prehospital analgesics provides a clinically useful addition, but one that is costlier per treated patient.

Trauma pain management in the emergency department: use of methoxyflurane as a patient-administered analgesic.

Evidence suggests that pain is highly prevalent among patients with traumatic injuries who attend emergency departments (EDs), yet accurate assessment and management of patients with acute pain can be challenging in this setting. Effective and rapid pain management is beneficial for patients and can support timely discharge from the ED, which is particularly important in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This article describes a service development project that introduced the use of a patient-administered analgesic, methoxyflurane, for patients with traumatic injuries with moderate to severe pain in one ED. The author outlines the benefits and rationale for using methoxyflurane as a first-line analgesic in this patient group and describes the main elements of training sessions for emergency nurses and other ED clinicians in the administration and supervision of patient-administered methoxyflurane.

Pain management with methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) in Swedish ambulance care - An observational pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In ambulance care, patients are often classified as high-risk, particularly when they are in immediate need of pain relief. It has been shown that, after ambulance nurses administer intravenous analgesic drugs, patients delivered to the emergency department tend to complain of moderate to severe pain. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the overall patient-perceived pain during treatment with methoxyflurane (MTX) in an ambulance-care setting. We also explored potential demographic variations. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 50 patients in need of ambulance care that perceived acute pain, defined as a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) value ≥4 (scale range: 1-10). We monitored the vital parameters of patients and MTX treatment characteristics, including the total number of inhaled MTX breaths and the average number of treatment sequences. RESULTS: Among the 50 patients initially assessed, we excluded 8 patients (16%), due to MTX contraindications. We excluded 10 patients (24%), due to discontinued treatment. The remaining cohort (n = 32) that fulfilled the pain-relieving procedure, included equal numbers of men and women. The average time spent in ambulance care was 29 ±â€¯15 min. The NRS scores for pain measured at the scene (median 8.0, interquartile range [IQR]: 7.25-10.0) were significantly higher than those measured at hospital admission (median 5.0, IQR: 4.0 7.0; p = .001). The median NRS scores measured at the hospital were different between sexes (men: 6.0, IQR: 5-7.25; women: 4.0, IQR: 3.76-6.0; p = .036). The average number of treatment sequences was 2. The overall average number of inhaled breaths was 17 ±â€¯9. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MTX provided clinically significant lower pain scores among patients in ambulance care without significant effects on vital parameters. However, the pharmacological characteristics of MTX appeared to affect the potential of achieving standardized treatment objectives.

The Reincarnation of Methoxyflurane.

Methoxyflurane was an inhaled agent commonly used for general anesthesia in the 1960s, but its clinical role gradually decreased in the 1970s because of reports of dose-dependent nephrotoxicity. In 1999 its manufacturer, Abbott Laboratories, discontinued distribution of methoxyflurane in the United States and Canada. Outside of North America, however, methoxyflurane has been reborn as an inhaled analgesic used for pain relief in the prehospital setting and for minor surgical procedures. First used in Australia and New Zealand, and subsequently in over thirty-seven other countries, low concentrations of methoxyflurane are administered with a hand-held inhaler which provides conscious sedation, so that patients can self-assess their level of pain and control the amount of inhaled agent. The Penthrox inhaler, originally developed in Australia after several other hand-held vaporizers were tried, is currently being used worldwide as a portable and disposable self-administered agent delivery system. Methoxyflurane-induced nephrotoxicity continues to be a major concern, but with cautious administration of recommended doses methoxyflurane has been established as a remarkably safe analgesic agent with minimal side effects for patients in need of rapid and potent pain relief.

Inhaled methoxyflurane for the management of trauma related pain in patients admitted to hospital emergency departments: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial (PenASAP study).

BACKGROUND: Oligo-analgesia is common in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed at reporting, when initiated by triage nurse, the superior efficacy of inhaled methoxyflurane plus standard of care (m-SoC) analgesia versus placebo plus SoC (p-SoC) for moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in the hospital ED. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at eight EDs. Adults with pain score ≥4 (11-point numerical rate scale, NRS) at admission were randomised to receive one or two inhalers containing m-SoC or p-SoC. Primary outcome measure was time until pain relief ≤30 mm, assessed on the 100-mm Visual Analogic Scale (VAS). RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were analysed (178 m-SoC; 173 p-SoC). Median pain prior to first inhalation was 66 mm, 75% had severe pain (NRS 6-10). Median time to pain relief was 35 min [95% confidence interval (CI), 28-62] for m-SoC versus not reached in p-SoC (92 - not reached) [hazard ratio), 1.93 (1.43-2.60), P < 0.001]. Pain relief was most pronounced in the severe pain subgroup: hazard ratio, 2.5 (1.7-3.7). As SoC, 24 (7%) patients received weak opioids (6 versus 8%), 4 (1%) strong opioid and 44 (13%) escalated to weak or strong opioids (8 versus 17%, respectively, P = 0.02). Most adverse events were of mild (111/147) intensity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we report that methoxyflurane, initiated at triage nurse as part of a multimodal analgesic approach, is effective in achieving pain relief for trauma patients. This effect was particularly pronounced in the severe pain subgroup.

Service Evaluation of Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Care for Overall Management of Patients with Pain Due to Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled methoxyflurane is an analgesic used for the emergency relief of moderate to severe pain in conscious adult patients with trauma and associated pain that is increasingly being used in hospital emergency departments to provide rapid analgesia. It is widely accepted that effective pain relief can facilitate patient care and flow through the emergency department (ED). The main aim of this evaluation was to assess the impact of inhaled methoxyflurane on patient length of stay (LOS) in the ED compared with standard care. METHODS: Adult patients with moderate to severe trauma pain and Glasgow coma score of 15 were included in the evaluation. Evaluation forms were completed for 79 patients who received methoxyflurane and were matched with 80 patients who received standard care. RESULTS: Overall the mean time spent in the ED was reduced by 71 min in those patients who were administered methoxyflurane compared with patients who received standard care. Furthermore, analysis of LOS by injury type demonstrated a reduction in ED LOS by 183 min for patients with shoulder dislocation who were treated with methoxyflurane compared with patients who received standard care. There was no reduction in ED LOS for patients with lower limb, hip or pelvic injuries between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Use of methoxyflurane in adult patients with trauma pain significantly reduced the ED LOS and may potentially improve patient flow through the ED.

[Acute pain management†: the role of inhaled methoxyflurane in clinical practice]. / Traitement de la douleur aiguë†: la place du méthoxyflurane inhalé dans la pratique clinique.

Since 2018, a new analgesic drug has been made available in Switzerland : methoxyflurane. This halogenated gas, controlled by the patient, offers a very effective analgesic effect comparable to opiates. Known since the 1960s and used mainly in pre-hospital emergency medicine in Australia and New Zealand, its use in Europe is increasing alongside standard analgesic treatments in the traumatic setting. Administered by inhalation, it does not require an intravenous access, which is ideal in prehospital emergency situations. This treatment could be used for the management of acute pain of various origins, such as renal lithiasis, or to facilitate different procedures, such as closed fracture reduction or chest tube insertion. Its indications are growing and its use will probably become commonplace with clinicians in a near future.

Depuis 2018, une nouvelle modalité antalgique est disponible en Suisse : le méthoxyflurane. Ce gaz halogéné, contrôlé par le·la patient·e, offre une antalgie très efficace, comparable aux opiacés. Utilisé depuis les années 1960 en médecine préhospitalière dans les régions d'Australie et de Nouvelle-Zélande, il fait ses preuves en Europe où on l'emploie avec les différents antalgiques habituels dans les situations traumatiques d'urgence. Par son administration inhalée, il ne nécessite aucune perfusion. Ce traitement pourrait être utilisé pour la gestion de douleurs aiguës d'origines diverses, telles que la colique néphrétique, ou encore faciliter différentes procédures, comme la réduction fermée de fracture ou la pose de drains. Son indication thérapeutique est croissante et son utilisation deviendra vraisemblablement commune.

Penthrox: a breath of PHEC air for the military?

Prehospital analgesia is vital to good clinical care and inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) would be a valuable addition to the armed forces medical armoury. Penthrox would provide strong, fast-acting, self-administered and safe analgesia to patients with moderate to severe injuries. In addition, it would provide an option for strong analgesia which would not be subject to the regulations that govern controlled or accountable drugs which gives it a unique position as the military moves its focus from large enduring operations to small short-term training teams supported by lone combat medics in remote locations across the globe.

[Use of methoxyflurane on acute pain during burn dressing in adult consultation]. / Utilisation du méthoxyflurane sur la douleur aiguë lors du pansement en consultation des brûlés adultes.

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to compare the short-term efficacy of methoxyflurane vs. MEOPA on acute pain during burn dressing in consultation, the secondary outcome was to assess the patient's comfort and the quality of the dressing performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monocentric, prospective study from April 2018 to January 2019. Men and women>18 years presenting acute burn on<10% SCT were included. A pain≥4 on the numerical scale (from 0 to 10) at the beginning of the treatment established the indication of methoxyflurane or MEOPA, with randomization done by a nurse. The following data were collected: burn description, performed debridement, pain assessment by numerical scale: on arrival, at the beginning of care, after 6 to 10 inhalations for methoxyflurane or 3 to 4minutes of inhalation for MEOPA and at the end of care. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included, 30 in each group. There was a decrease of -2.47 points of numerical scale when initiating methoxyflurane against -1.53 points for MEOPA (P=0.08). Patients were significantly less painful when stopping treatment in the methoxyflurane group -4 points vs -2 points (P=0.001). Methoxyflurane significantly improved the debridement of the burn (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane is more effective than MEOPA in acute pain in burn dressing, improved patient comfort, and improved dressing quality.

Inhaled Methoxyflurane Provides Greater Analgesia and Faster Onset of Action Versus Standard Analgesia in Patients With Trauma Pain: InMEDIATE: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Emergency Departments.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of the InMEDIATE study was to evaluate the change in intensity of traumatic pain over the first 20 min in adult patients treated with methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment in Spain. This the first randomized, active-controlled, multicenter trial of methoxyflurane in the emergency setting in Europe. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled study that enrolled adult patients with acute moderate to severe (score ≥4 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale) trauma-associated pain in 14 Spanish emergency departments. Patients were randomized 1:1 to methoxyflurane (up to 2×3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment. Coprimary endpoints were the change from baseline in Numeric Rating Scale pain intensity score during the first 20 minutes of treatment and time to first pain relief. RESULTS: Three hundred five patients were randomized (methoxyflurane 156; standard analgesic treatment 149). Most patients in the standard analgesic treatment group (70%) received intravenous first-step analgesics and 9.4% of patients were treated with opioids. Mean decrease from baseline in Numeric Rating Scale pain intensity score was greater for methoxyflurane than standard analgesic treatment at all points, with a significant treatment difference overall up to 20 minutes (repeated-measures model 2.47 versus 1.39; treatment difference 1.00; 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.32). Median time to first pain relief was significantly shorter for methoxyflurane than standard analgesic treatment (3 versus 10 minutes). Methoxyflurane achieved better patient and clinician ratings for pain control and comfort of treatment than standard analgesic treatment and exceeded patient and clinician expectations of treatment in, respectively, 77% and 72% of cases compared with 38% and 19% for standard analgesic treatment. CONCLUSION: These results support consideration of methoxyflurane as a nonnarcotic, easy-to-administer, rapid-acting, first-line alternative to currently available analgesic treatments for trauma pain.

Multimodal oral analgesia for non-severe trauma patients: evaluation of a triage-nurse directed protocol combining methoxyflurane, paracetamol and oxycodone.

Insufficient analgesia affects around 50% of emergency department patients. The use of a protocol helps to reduce the risk of oligoanalgesia in this context. Our objective was to describe the feasibility and efficacy of a multimodal analgesia protocol (combining paracetamol, oxycodone, and inhaled methoxyflurane) initiated by triage nurse. We performed a prospective, observational study in an emergency department (Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, France) between December 2017 and April 2018. Adult non-severe trauma patients with a numerical pain rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 4 were included. The primary efficacy criterion was the proportion of patients with an NRS score ≤ 3 at 15 min. Pain intensity was measured for 60 min and during radiography. Data on adverse events and satisfaction were recorded. A total of 200 adult patients were included (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age: 32 [23-49] years; 126 men (63%)). Sixty-six patients (33%) reported an NRS score ≤ 3 at 15 min. The time required to achieve a decrease of at least 2 points in the NRS score was 10 (5-20) min. The median [IQR] pain intensity was 4 [2-5] before radiography and 4 [2-6] during radiography. Adverse events were frequent (n = 128, 64%). No serious adverse events were reported. The patients and caregivers reported good levels of satisfaction. The administration of a nurse-driven multimodal analgesia protocol (combining paracetamol, oxycodone, and methoxyflurane) was feasible on admission to the emergency department. It rapidly produced long-lasting analgesia in adult trauma patients.Trial registration: NCT03380247.

BET 1: Green or blue for you? Methoxyflurane (Penthrox) or nitrous oxide/oxygen 50% mixture (Entonox) for the management of acute pain in the ED.

A short-cut review of the literature was carried out to establish whether inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) is comparable or superior with a standard inhalational analgesia for the management of acute pain. Only two papers were identified as suitable for inclusion using the reported search strategy. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of the best papers are tabulated. It is concluded that both methods of inhaled analgesia appear to be useful options for acute pain in the ED when compared with placebo. No evidence was found to suggest superiority of methoxypenflurane. International studies directly comparing the use of both drugs for in acute trauma are ongoing and will develop the evidence base.

Analgesia protocols for burns dressings: Challenges with implementation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare doctors' knowledge regarding analgesia in paediatric burns patients in a setting where analgesia protocols are provided but not reinforced to a setting where the same protocols are used but with constant re-enforcement from burns surgeons. METHODS: We reviewed questionnaires completed anonymously by doctors managing burns children in the Pietermaritzburg (PMB) Hospital Complex and the referral hospitals. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 43 doctors with 53% of the participants working in the referral hospitals. Procedural sedation was given by 98% of doctors. All PMB doctors giving procedural sedation used ketamine compared to 39% in the referral hospitals, which was statistically significant (×2 = 18.237; p < 0.001). Eighty percent of PMB doctors were aware of the correct doses of ketamine and compared to 8% of referral doctors. This was statistically significant (×2 = 21.778; p < 0.001). When assessing the adequacy of analgesia, all of the doctors from PMB used a scoring system or clinical impression. In the referral doctor group, 54% used a scoring system, 38% used the child screaming as an indicator of inadequate analgesia. CONCLUSION: We have identified a discrepancy in knowledge between staff in an academic burn centre and those in peripheral referral hospitals. This discrepancy translates into differences in quality of burn analgesia which patients receive. Ongoing efforts must be directed towards changing the culture of district institution and strengthening attempts to standardize care across the region.