Update on Total Auricular Construction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand principles of preoperative planning for microtia repair. 2. Understand key techniques for flap design, skin envelope dissection, framework creation, and donor-site reconstruction. 3. Describe important components of postoperative management. SUMMARY: Total auricular construction remains a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. This article describes current surgical strategies and advancements for microtia construction. The authors' focus is to describe the several keys for success that are useful for young surgeons who wish to train themselves to create satisfactory results.

Retrospective study on unilateral polyotia combined with microtia utilizing the technique of preserving residual ear tissue.

BACKGROUND: The presence of polyotia in individuals with microtia is a rare deformity. Due to the intricate structure of the auricle, uncertain etiology, and challenging corrective techniques, it has always been a focal point in the field of plastic surgery. The present study presents a technique for correcting the combination of polyotia and microtia by utilizing residual ear tissue as graft material. METHODS: The retrospective study included 23 patients with polyotia and microtia from 2018 to 2022. The residual ear tissue was used to rectify auricular deformities in all patients. The patients were instructed to evaluate the satisfaction of the auricle shape using a visual analog scale (VAS) both before and 6 months after the surgical procedure. The esthetic outcomes of auricle subunits were simultaneously assessed by a senior physician pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up in this study was 8.73 months. The preoperative VAS satisfaction score was recorded as 2.26 ± 0.86, while the post-operative VAS score significantly increased to 7.86 ± 0.86. The preoperative auricle esthetic outcomes score was recorded as 9.95 ± 1.74, while the post-operative score significantly increased to 24.04 ± 2.16. The follow-up period did not present any cases of flap necrosis, hematoma, infection, or wound dehiscence. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that comprehensive utilization of residual auricular tissue can lead to optimal outcomes in correcting polyotia with concha-type microtia. The utilization of residual ear tissue can be maximized to streamline the operation, minimize bodily harm, and enhance patient satisfaction.

[Cochlear implantation through retro-facial approach with congenital microtia malformation with facial nerve deformity: a case report].

The difficulty of cochlear implantation in patients with congenital microtia is usually increased due to the vague anatomical marks and facial nerve malformation. The common types of facial nerve malformation include facial nerve bony cover loss, aberrant position, and bifurcation malformation. Bifurcation malformation may obscure the oval window, press against stapes, and bifurcate in the vestibular window while obscuring the round window. It is important to correctly identify the facial nerve and choose a reasonable surgical approach to avoid postoperative complications. This article describes a case of profound sensorineural hearing loss due to facial nerve malformation in our institution. The patient underwent cochlear implantation through the retro-facial approach. There was no facial nerve injury or dysfunction symptoms such as facial paralysis and hemifacial spasm 2 years after the operation, and the cochlear implant works well. The score of the categories of the auditory performance（CAP） questionnaire was 7, and the score of the speech intelligibility rating（SIR） questionnaire was 4. When the round window cannot be exposed through the facial recess approach during surgery, the retro-facial approach is a feasible method. To avoid facial nerve injury, a thin-section CT of the temporal bone should be performed before the middle and inner ear surgery for patients with facial nerve malformation, and the intraoperative facial nerve monitor should be used to clarify the course of the facial nerve to avoid injury.

Perioperative position management of 46 cases with simultaneous bilateral auricle reconstruction: A summary of experience.

OBJECTIVES: The primary problem in simultaneous bilateral auricle reconstruction is the fragility of the reconstructed ear structure. Postoperative pressure is strictly prohibited to ensure the operation's effectiveness. The study aimed to summarize the experience of perioperative postural management in simultaneous bilateral auricular reconstruction. METHOD: This study summarizes the experience of perioperative postural management, providing preoperative sleeping posture adaptability training, neck movement training, standardization of the head position angles and the head suspension time in surgery, using protective headrests, paying attention to the transfer and handover procedures, and using specially designed pillows. RESULTS: The comprehensive nursing approach in simultaneous bilateral auricular reconstruction significantly reduced complications, improved patient comfort, and optimized postoperative adaptation. Preoperative posture training, standardized intraoperative head positions, and vigilant postoperative care played pivotal roles, demonstrating positive outcomes in 46 cases. DISCUSSION: Perioperative position management can reduce the risk of complications and pressure injuries, improving patients' postoperative comfort, emotional state, tolerance, and adaptability. CONCLUSION: All ears were viable and in good shape after long-term follow-up. The experiences discussed in this study can be broadly applied to technically mature ear reconstruction teams.

Prograde transposition for anteriorly low-set earlobe in lobule-type microtia reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Lobule transposition, a common procedure in auricle reconstruction, has been successfully performed over the past few decades. However, the transposition methods for unilateral microtia with evident asymmetry of bilateral earlobe positions still remain a challenge. The objective of this study was to investigate the application of prograde transposition for anteriorly low-set earlobes. METHOD: A total of 25 patients with lobule-type microtia with anteriorly low-set residual earlobe underwent prograde transposition during auricle reconstruction between 2020 and 2022. The post-operative earlobe aesthetic assessment and patient satisfaction were evaluated, and the data on any complications that occurred when followed-up were collected. This study provides a comprehensive analysis and summary of the techniques used in earlobe transposition for auricular reconstruction. RESULTS: The patients with evident asymmetry between the residual and healthy earlobes were usually concomitant with hemifacial microsomia and the residual ear was located in the anterior and lower region. No instances of flap necrosis, hematoma, or wound dehiscence were observed following auricular reconstruction. The mean aesthetic score of the auricle was 3.52, with 23 patients attaining good or excellent aesthetic outcomes. The mean Visual Analog Scale satisfaction score was 3.68, with 24 patients reporting relative satisfaction or satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The prograde transposition of anteriorly low-set earlobe in lobule-type microtia reconstruction can effectively ensure adequate blood supply, enhance aesthetic appearance, and significantly improve patient satisfaction.

Comparing the Analgesic Effects Between the Pre- and Post-costal Cartilage Harvest Cohorts Using Ultrasound-Guided Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Children with Microtia Undergoing Auricular Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Pain following costal cartilage harvest surgery is the most common complaint of auricular reconstruction (AR). Anesthesiologists are continuously searching for an effective postoperative pain control method. METHODS: This study was conducted from 10 April 2022 to 10 June 2022. Sixty children undergoing AR using costal cartilage were randomly assigned to either a serratus anterior plane block performed before costal cartilage harvest (SAPB-pre-cohort; n = 30) or the SAPB-post-cohort (Post-costal cartilage Harvest Cohort: n = 30). The primary endpoint measures were the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores of the chest and ear pain degrees recorded at 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h after surgery. Intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic dosages, sufentanil consumption and rescue analgesia consumption during the first 24 h post-operation, cough score during extubation, extubation agitation score, length of stay, the extubation time, first ambulatory time, analgesia duration, and opioid-related adverse effects and SAPB-related adverse effects were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The rest and coughing NRS scores were significantly reduced in the SAPB-pre-cohort 6 and 12 h post-operation in comparison with the SAPB-post-cohort (rest 6 h p = 0.002, others p < 0.001). No significant difference in the NRS ear scores existed between the two cohorts (p > 0.05). The use of propofol and remifentanil for general anesthesia during the SAPB-pre-procedure was significantly reduced compared to the SAPB-post-group, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). Sufentanil consumption and rescue analgesia consumption were significantly reduced in the SAPB-pre-cohort (p = 0.001, p = 0.033). The extubation time and first ambulatory time were markedly shorter in the SAPB-pre-cohort (all p < 0.001). Analgesia duration was markedly longer in the SAPB-pre-cohort (p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in the cough score during extubation, extubation agitation score, length of stay between the two cohorts (all p > 0.05). Opioid-related adverse effects occurred more in the SAPB-post-cohort, while there was no statistical significance (16.7 vs. 36.7%; p = 0.082). There were no blockade-related complications observed in either cohort. CONCLUSION: The analgesic effect of the SAPB-pre-cohort was better than the SAPB-post-cohort suggesting both efficacy and feasibility of preemptive analgesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Anatomical variant of the superficial temporal artery in temporoparietal fascia flap for microtia reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Single-stage microtia auricular reconstruction is becoming more relevant. The determining factor is a temporoparietal fascia flap (TPF) with both branches of the superficial temporal artery (STA). There are not many studies regarding vascular branching in people with microtia. METHODS: We conducted an anatomical study on the TPF flap harvested during single-stage endoscopic-assisted microtia auricular reconstruction from May 2018 to July 2021. We observed the flaps under endoscopic and surgical microscopes to determine several variables (vascular size, number of frontal/parietal branches, distance from the branching location to the estimated external ear canal, distance from the frontal artery to projected course of facial nerve's frontal branch, etc.). RESULTS: The study included 55 flaps from 54 patients. Of the 55 flaps, 50 (90.9%) had a parietal branch, and all 55 (100%) had a frontal branch with a mean diameter of 0.98 and 0.91 mm, respectively. Regarding the frontal artery, 1.8%, 25.5%, 50.9%, 16.35% and 5.45% had 0-4 traverse frontal branch(es), respectively. The mean distance from the frontal artery to the estimated course of the frontal nerve was 10.56 mm. Parietal artery absence is more likely in patients with severe hemifacial microsomia or STA trunk go under the auricular cartilage remnants (p < 0.05). Either frontal or parietal artery absence or small diameter can cause necrosis. Frontal arteries travelling near the frontal nerve may result in post-operative nerve palsy. CONCLUSIONS: Microtia auricular reconstructive surgery is always a big challenge for plastic surgeons. Anatomical variants are common. A detailed anatomical description of the STA, with the help of microsurgery and endoscopy, allows arterial-based flap designing and harvest, which tremendously improves surgical success rate by diminishing flap necrosis and nerve damage. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Effects of Radial Cartilage Incision on the Growth of Rabbit Ear.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, radial cartilage incision (first-stage) at an early age combined with free auricular composite tissue grafting (second-stage) can effectively correct the concha-type microtia with the moderate or severe folded cartilage in the middle and upper third auricle, but radial cartilage incision's effects on the growth of the ear remain to be determined. The authors aimed to evaluate the effects of radial cartilage incision in young rabbits model. METHODS: Ten New Zealand white rabbits were included in our experiment. Two ears of each rabbit were divided randomly into two groups. The experimental group was operated with radial cartilage incision, and no intervention was given to the control group. The ear width, length, and perimeter were noted every two weeks. Auricular surface area was noted at 4 and 22 weeks old. The repeated measures ANOVA was used to describe ears' growth trend. A paired-sample's t test is conducted to test whether there are significant differences among the variables through the SPSS25.0 software. RESULTS: The growth tendencies of the ear length, width, and perimeter were observed and analyzed. The growth curves of the experimental ears were similar to that of the control. There was no significant difference in the increased ratio of surface area among the two groups. The cartilage of the experimental ears showed no change in biomechanical properties compared to that of control group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that radial cartilage incision at an early age does not influence the growth of rabbit ear length, width, perimeter, and surface area and also does not change the biomechanical properties of the cartilage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Stakeholders' Views on Information Needed in a Patient Decision Aid for Microtia Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess which information about microtia and the possible reconstructive options health care providers (HCPs), patients and parents believe should be included in a patient decision aid (PtDA). DESIGN: A mixed-methods study comprised of an online survey of HCPs and focus group discussions with patients and parents. PARTICIPANTS: Survey respondents were members of the International Society for Auricular Reconstruction (ISAR). Focus group participants were patients with microtia and their parents, recruited through the microtia outpatient clinic at Amsterdam UMC, and through a Dutch patient organization for cleft and craniofacial conditions. METHODS: An online, investigator-made survey was sent to ISAR members in December 2021. Semi-structured focus group discussions were held in February 2022. Quantitative results were summarized, and qualitative results were thematically grouped. RESULTS: Thirty-two HCPs responded to the survey (response rate 41%). Most respondents (n = 24) were plastic surgeons, who had a median of 15 years of experience (IQR: 7-23 years). Two focus groups were held with a total of five patients and two parents. HCPs, patients and parents generally agreed on the information needed in a PtDA, emphasizing the importance of realistic expectation management. Patients and parents also considered psychosocial and functional outcomes, patient experiences, as well as patients' involvement in decision-making important. CONCLUSIONS: A PtDA for microtia reconstruction should target all patients with microtia, and include information on at least technique-related information, expected esthetic results, possible adverse effects, psychosocial and functional outcomes and patient experiences. Preference eliciting questions should be developed for both pediatric patients and their parents.

Reconstruction of Concha-Type Microtia Using a Delayed Postauricular Skin Flap.

SUMMARY: Understanding how to remove and retain the relatively large residual auricle is important in concha-type microtia reconstruction. The authors present a method for concha-type microtia reconstruction using a delayed postauricular skin flap. A total of 40 patients with concha-type microtia who underwent ear reconstruction using a delayed postauricular skin flap were retrospectively examined. Reconstruction was performed in three stages. The first stage consisted of preparing a delayed postauricular skin flap and dealing with the residual auricle including removal of the upper residual auricular cartilage. In the second stage, an autogenous rib cartilage framework was placed and covered with a delayed postauricular skin flap, postauricular fascia flap, and autologous medium-thickness skin graft. The ear framework was carefully articulated and secured with the retained residual auricular cartilage to achieve a smooth junction between the two. The third stage involved modification of the reconstructed ear. Patients were followed up for 12 months after ear reconstruction. All reconstructed auricles had a good appearance, and there was a smooth connection between the reconstructed auricle and the residual ear, with similar color as well as a flat and thin scar. All patients were satisfied with the results. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Optimal surgical timing for ear reconstruction with autologous cartilage: Analysis of the computed tomography scan characteristics of the ribs.

BACKGROUND: The approach to constructing the cartilage framework for ear reconstruction is sufficiently established. However, there is still no consensus about the age of initiation of surgical treatment. This study aims to assess the development and growth of the costal cartilage to determine the best age to perform ear reconstruction surgery. METHODS: Out of 107 patients, we used presurgical treatment data for 40 patients and medical records for 67 patients aged 5-40. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed, and average parameters were calculated (length, width, thickness, cartilage density, and standard deviation in Hounsfield units) of the cartilaginous part of the 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th ribs. RESULTS: The required values were reached at 9-10 years old. CONCLUSION: The criteria for starting surgical treatment in the Russian population was determined by the width of the 6th-7th ribs synchondrosis, which must be equal to the width of a healthy auricle, and the length of the 8th rib should be longer than 9 cm. Therefore, the optimal age for ear reconstruction with autologous costal cartilage is 10 years and older. However, reconstruction can be made earlier in specific cases, according to height and weight and the preoperative CT scan.

A Hybrid Auricular Framework of Autologous Rib Cartilage and a Porous Polyethylene Implant for Reconstruction of Congenital Microtia: A Modification of Nagata's Technique.

Background: An implant (porous polyethylene) is an alternative to rib cartilage for microtia reconstruction but carries a risk of extrusion. Objective: To evaluate the outcome of a hybrid framework of implant with rib cartilage for microtia reconstruction. Methods: Patients who underwent Nagata's technique for microtia reconstruction were reviewed for complications and aesthetic score. In stage 1, a rib cartilage framework or a hybrid framework of implant with rib cartilage was used. In stage 2, the framework was elevated and supported by an implant for projection. Postoperative outcomes were reported for both groups. Results: Forty-four ears of 40 patients underwent surgery. Eleven ears received a rib auricular framework and 33 ears a hybrid auricular framework. The mean postoperative follow-up for the rib and hybrid groups was 76.3 and 43.1 months, respectively. No supporting postauricular implant extruded, whereas stainless-steel wires extruded in seven ears (15.9%). Five (15.2%) hybrid frameworks were removed due to infection or extrusion. Mean operating time was 2 h shorter in the hybrid group. Aesthetic outcomes were similar for both groups. Conclusion: A hybrid framework of rib and implant that requires less harvested cartilage is feasible for microtia reconstruction, but caution should be used due to its higher explantation rate.

Quantitative Framework Fabrication with Autogenous Costal Cartilage in Microtia Reconstruction.

Hearing improvement is another basic requirement for microtia patients in addition to aesthetic needs. This quantitative framework fabrication method can reduce the learning curve, obtain satisfactory aesthetic results with few complications, and reserve a certain space for future canalplasty. Laryngoscope, 134:148-153, 2024.

Brent Technique of Repair Versus Nagata Auricular Reconstruction for Microtia Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Up to 17.4 in every 10,000 births are affected by microtia, but no consensus exists on a gold standard technique for autogenous repair. In this study, the authors compare 2 common methods-the Brent and Nagata autogenous costal cartilage ear reconstruction techniques. A systematic review of the literature and a quantitative meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of these 2 approaches were performed. The outcomes analyzed included rates of infection, necrosis, cartilage exposure, cartilage resorption, hematoma, wire extrusion, and hypertrophic scar. METHODS: A MEDLINE database systematic review with the following keywords: microtia, Brent, and Nagata was performed. Case reports and articles without original data or patient outcomes were excluded. Inclusion methods for study selection are outlined in Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SCS/F461 , below. The prevalence of outcomes for each study was analyzed through meta-analysis of proportions using Stata. RESULTS: A total of 536 potential studies were retrieved for review. Twelve of these studies met inclusion criteria. Four studies utilized the Brent method of repair with the inclusion of 563 ear reconstructions. Nine studies implemented the Nagata technique in 2304 reconstructions. Two studies directly compared the Brent (327 ears) and Nagata (471 ears) techniques. The calculated rate and 95% confidence intervals are summarized in Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/SCS/F461 . There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the Brent and Nagata microtic reconstruction techniques identified in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The Brent and Nagata microtia reconstruction techniques have no difference in the risk of infection, necrosis, cartilage exposure, cartilage resorption, hematoma, wire extrusion, or hypertrophic scars.

Early Postoperative Complications in Microtia Reconstruction: An Analysis of the NSQIP-P Database.

OBJECTIVES: Microtia and anotia repair require techniques that consider both aesthetics and function. The outcomes of different reconstructive frameworks such as costal cartilage or a porous polyethylene implant have not been evaluated on a national scale. We aim to understand differences in outcomes/complication rates and operative times between different reconstructive frameworks used in microtia/anotia reconstruction. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database between 2012-2019. Patients with ICD-9/10 codes for microtia/anotia were isolated. Reconstruction methods were identified using CPT codes for rib graft, ear cartilage graft, and alloplastic implants (biocompatible implants, porous polyethylene, etc). Outcomes included operative-time, wound complications, and unplanned re-operations within 30 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for confounders. RESULTS: We included 593 patients for analysis. Reconstruction with rib grafts (N = 506, 85%) was the most common. In 58 patients (9.8%), an implant was used for the auricular framework, whereas in 47 (7.9%) ear cartilage grafts were used. The overall wound complication rate was 3.4%. On univariate analysis, alloplastic implants exhibited a higher rate of wound complications (8.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.037) and longer operative times (350 min vs. 235 min, p < 0.001). After controlling for demographics and comorbidities, implants conferred an independently increased risk of wound complications (OR 3.52, 1.10-9.54, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Although the use of alloplastic implants (e.g., porous polyethylene) may confer an increased risk of early complications, the long-term clinical implications of these findings are unclear relative to aesthetic benefits. Multi-institutional studies are needed to validate these findings using patient-specific and surgeon-specific data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:1214-1219, 2024.

Role of early hearing aid experience in speech recognition in patients with bilateral congenital microtia following Bonebridge implantation: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To identify audiological and demographic variables that predict speech recognition abilities in patients with bilateral microtia who underwent Bonebridge (BB) implantation. METHODS: Fifty patients with bilateral microtia and bilateral conductive hearing loss (CHL) who underwent BB implantation were included. Demographic data, preoperative hearing aid use experience, and audiological outcomes (including pure-tone hearing threshold, sound field hearing threshold [SFHT], and speech recognition ability) for each participant were obtained. The Chinese-Mandarin Speech Test Materials were used to test speech recognition ability. The word recognition score (WRS) of disyllabic words at 65 dB SPL signals was measured before and after BB implantation in quiet and noisy conditions. RESULTS: The mean preoperative WRS under quiet and noisy conditions was 10.44 ± 12.73% and 5.90 ± 8.76%, which was significantly improved to 86.38 ± 9.03% and 80.70 ± 11.34%, respectively, following BB fitting. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that lower preoperative SFHT suggested higher preoperative WRS under both quiet and noisy conditions. Higher age at implantation predicted higher preoperative WRS under quiet conditions. Furthermore, patients with more preoperative hearing aid experience and lower postoperative SFHT were more likely to have higher postoperative WRS under both quiet and noisy testing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first attempt to identify predictors of preoperative and postoperative speech recognition abilities in patients with bilateral microtia with BB implantation. These findings emphasize that early hearing intervention before implantation surgery, combined with appropriate postoperative fitting, contributes to optimal benefits in terms of postoperative speech recognition ability.

New Strategies for Remnant Ear Treatment in Microtia Reconstruction Based on Morphometric Studies.

OBJECTIVE: Given the lack of specific evaluation indices, it is difficult to determine whether to transpose or abandon remnant ears in lobule-type microtia reconstruction. The authors illuminate referable parameters beneficial for proper treatment of remnant ear in an efficient manner. METHODS: A series of 359 lobule-type microtia patients underwent autogenous costal cartilage auricular reconstruction between 2016 and 2021. Fourteen measuring points and defined distances as well as six ratios of specific distances based on position, plumpness, similarity and the width-to-length ratio of the remnant ear have been described, and relevant tactics for appropriate treatments are introduced. RESULTS: Definite morphometric results contribute to attaining satisfactory contours of reconstructed auricles with harmonious earlobes, which exhibit highly similar dimensions and appearances compared to the contralateral normal ears. CONCLUSION: With the help of the proposed locating points and measuring approaches, the procedure of remnant ear treatment is systematically clarified. This technique ensures operation safety and contributes to the aesthetic contour of the auricle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Laryngoscope, 134:2741-2747, 2024.

Vascular variation of temporoparietal fascia in microtia associated with hemifacial microsomia.

The study analyzed vascular variations in microtia associated with hemifacial microsomia (HFM). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 47 patients with microtia and HFM, who underwent computed tomography angiography between November 2011 and May 2022. The vascular course and branching supplying the TPF were analyzed. Craniometric measurements were conducted to determine the horizontal distance from the porion and fronto-zygomatic suture (F-Z suture) to the vessels. On the affected side, the TPF was primarily supplied by either the superficial temporal artery (STA) or the postauricular artery-originated STA (Po-STA). The Po-STA (n = 29) was more prevalent than the STA (n = 18), and mostly exhibited a single frontal branch (n = 20). Craniometric analysis revealed that the Po-STA was closer to the porion, ear vestige, and F-Z suture than the STA on the non-affected side. Furthermore, a significant correlation was observed between the severity of mandibular hypoplasia and presence of Po-STA variation (Cramer's V = 0.498, p = 0.005). Microtia associated with HFM exhibits vascular variations in the TPF - in particular, a unique Po-STA variation. The Po-STA is prone to injury during ear reconstruction because of its proximity to the external auditory canal and ear vestige. Surgeons should be cautious of these anatomical variations for safer ear reconstruction procedures, and utilize preoperative imaging for meticulous planning.