An updated single center experience with plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for stem cell mobilization in light chain amyloidosis.

The use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without chemotherapy to mobilize hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) can result in significant morbidity in light chain (AL) amyloidosis patients. Plerixafor, a strong inducer and mobilizer of HPCs, can be used as an adjunct to G-CSF to improve mobilization efficiency. We describe the outcomes for combined G-CSF/plerixafor mobilized patients with AL amyloidosis. We reviewed data of 53 consecutive AL amyloidosis patients who underwent combined G-CSF/plerixafor HPC mobilization between May 2011 and October 2017 at our institution. We evaluated patients for HPC collection efficiency, perimobilization toxicity and postautologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) outcomes. Median CD34+ cell collection was 12.4 × 106 cells/kg (range 2.5 × 106 to 34.1 × 106 cells/kg) and 45 (85%) patients had collections of ≥5.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. There were no mobilization failures or perimobilization mortality. During mobilization, 37 (70%) patients had weight gain (median 1.3 kg, range 0.1-4) but none >10% body weight, 5 (10%) patients had diarrhea, and one patient each had hypotension and cardiac arrhythmia. Among the 31 patients analyzed for CD34 collection efficiency (CE), the median CD34 CE was 47% (range 36-62). At 5 years follow-up 82% and 84% of patients were progression-free and alive, respectively. Our results suggest that G-CSF/plerixafor mobilization is safe, well tolerated, and effective in AL amyloidosis.

Plerixafor Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma: Long-Term Follow-Up Report.

The purpose of this report is to analyze long-term clinical outcomes of patients exposed to plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for stem cell mobilization. This was a study of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; n = 167) and multiple myeloma (MM; n = 163) who were enrolled in the long-term follow-up of 2 pivotal phase III studies (NCT00741325 and NCT00741780) of 240 µg/kg plerixafor plus 10 µg/kg G-CSF, or placebo plus 10 µg/kg G-CSF to mobilize and collect CD34+ cells for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated over a 5-year period following the first dose of plerixafor or placebo. The probability of OS was not significantly different in patients with NHL or MM treated with plerixafor or placebo (NHL: 64%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 56% to 71% versus 56%; 95% CI, 44% to 67%, respectively; MM: 64%; 95% CI, 54% to 72% versus 64%; 95% CI, 53% to 73%, respectively). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the probability of PFS over 5 years between treatment groups in patients with NHL (50%; 95% CI, 44% to 67% for plerixafor versus 43%; 95% CI, 31% to 54% for placebo) or those with MM (17%; 95% CI, 10% to 24% for plerixafor versus 30%; 95% CI, 21% to 40% for placebo). In this long-term follow-up study, the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF for stem cell mobilization did not affect 5-year survival in patients with NHL or patients with MM.

The effect of the dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) regimen on stem cell mobilization and transplant outcomes of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who are candidates for up-front autologous stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data on dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) as a mobilization regimen, compared to high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC), for up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is limited. METHODS: Consecutive patients with aggressive NHL treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or rituximab-CHOP who underwent chemomobilization using HDC or DHAP plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for up-front ASCT were enrolled from three institutions between 2004 and 2014. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (57 men) were included. Sixty-five patients (67.7%) received HDC; and 31 (32.3%), DHAP. The total CD34+ cells mobilized were significantly higher in patients receiving DHAP (16.1 vs. 6.1 × 106/kg, p = 0.001). More patients achieved successful mobilization with DHAP (CD34+ cells ≥ 5.0 × 106/kg) compared to HDC (87.1% vs. 61.5%, respectively; p = 0.011), particularly within the first two sessions of apheresis (64.5% vs. 32.3%, respectively; p = 0.003). Mobilization failure rate (CD34+ cells < 2.0 × 106/kg) was significantly higher in patients receiving HDC (20.0% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, the DHAP regimen (odds ratio, 4.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 15.17) was an independent predictor of successful mobilization. During chemomobilization, patients receiving HDC experienced more episodes of febrile neutropenia compared to patients receiving DHAP (32.3% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The DHAP regimen was associated with a significantly higher efficacy for stem cell mobilization and lower frequency of febrile neutropenia. Therefore, DHAP plus G-CSF is an effective for mobilization in patients with aggressive NHL who were candidates for up-front ASCT.

Adverse Prognostic Factors for Morbidity and Mortality During Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Light Chain Amyloidosis.

Patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis undergoing peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell (PBSC) mobilization for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) can experience significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to characterize the adverse events and identify prognostic factors associated with the development of morbidity and mortality in patients with AL amyloidosis who had begun PBSC mobilization for auto-HCT. A retrospective study was performed in 101 consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent PBSC mobilization for auto-HCT between January 2006 and December 2013. A composite primary endpoint of morbidity and mortality during PBSC mobilization was used. Forty-one patients (41%) experienced at least 1 adverse event, including 4 deaths during PBSC mobilization. Adverse events included in this composite endpoint were cardiac events, thromboembolic events, bleeding events, unplanned hospitalization, weight gain >2% necessitating diuretic intervention, and death. Low serum albumin levels, elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and increased interventricular septal thickness were significantly associated with the composite primary endpoint (P = .024, .001, and .006, respectively). The median progression-free survival from the start of PBSC mobilization was 4.7 years, and the median overall survival was 6.5 years. In general, PBSC mobilization is associated with minimal complications, but patients with AL amyloidosis can experience more frequent and severe complications, such as volume overload and weight gain. Careful patient selection is warranted in patients with AL amyloidosis before proceeding to PBSC mobilization and auto-HCT.

Chemotherapy-Based Stem Cell Mobilization Does Not Result in Significant Paraprotein Reduction in Myeloma Patients in the Era of Novel Induction Regimens.

Novel induction agents markedly improved remission rates in multiple myeloma (MM), and the continued use of chemotherapy for CD34+ stem cell mobilization (SCM) has been questioned. We examined the additional effect of chemotherapy in SCM regarding remission status/morbidity. We reviewed 236 consecutive MM patients (aged 36 to 75 years) with first autologous stem cell transplantation from January 2009 to March 2016 after chemotherapy-based SCM. Responses were measured by changes in intact Ig and free light chain levels before and after chemomobilization (International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] criteria). Most patients (225/236, 95.3%) received novel induction regimens, which were bortezomib-based (n = 223) and/or lenalidomide-based (n = 19). Most patients (170/190, 89.5%) achieved at least partial remission postinduction and pre-SCM. Stem cells were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and cyclophosphamide-based (212/227, 93.4%) or etoposide-based (15/227, 6.6%) regimens. There were insignificant changes in serum Ig and free light chain levels before and after chemomobilization either in the whole cohort or subgroups. Significant improvements of the IMWG remission status were documented in only 7 of 236 patients (3.0%). Sixty-seven patients (28.4%) developed chemotherapy-related complications (neutropenic fever, sepsis, and others), resulting in 9 hospitalizations (3.8%). Our study suggests that although causing significant morbidity, chemotherapy-based mobilization fails to improve remission status. The value of incorporating additional chemotherapy for SCM is thus not evident.

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death in developed countries, and current treatment modalities have failed to regenerate the dead myocardium resulting from the ischemic damage. Stem cells have the potential to regenerate the damaged myocardium. These cells can be mobilized from the bone marrow by factors such as granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of stem cell mobilization following granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2010), MEDLINE (1950 to November week 3, 2010), EMBASE (1980 to 2010 week 48), BIOSIS Previews (1969 to 30 November 2010), ISI Science Citation Index Expanded (1970 to 4 December 2010) and ISI Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (1990 to 4 December 2010). We also checked reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials including participants with a clinical diagnosis of AMI who were randomly allocated to the subcutaneous administration of G-CSF through a daily dose of 2.5, 5 or 10 microgram/kg for four to six days or placebo. No age or other restrictions were applied for the selection of patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected trials, assessed trials for eligibility and methodological quality, and extracted data regarding the clinical efficacy and adverse outcomes. Disagreements were resolved by the third author. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven trials reported in 30 references in the review (354 participants). In all trials, G-CSF was compared with placebo preparations. Dosage of G-CSF varied among studies, ranging from 2.5 to 10 microgram/kg/day. Regarding overall risk of bias, data regarding the generation of randomization sequence and incomplete outcome data were at a low risk of bias; however, data regarding binding of personnel were not conclusive. The rate of mortality was not different between the two groups (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.80, P = 0.55). Regarding safety, the limited amount of evidence is inadequate to reach any conclusions regarding the safety of G-CSF therapy. Moreover, the results did not show any beneficial effects of G-CSF in patients with AMI regarding left ventricular function parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction (RR 3.41, 95% CI -0.61 to 7.44, P = 0.1), end systolic volume (RR -1.35, 95% CI -4.68 to 1.99, P = 0.43) and end diastolic volume (RR -4.08, 95% CI -8.28 to 0.12, P = 0.06). It should also be noted that the study was limited since the trials included lacked long enough follow up durations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence from small trials suggested a lack of benefit of G-CSF therapy in patients with AMI. Since data of the risk of bias regarding blinding of personnel were not conclusive, larger RCTs with appropriate power calculations and longer follow up durations are required in order to address current uncertainties regarding the clinical efficacy and therapy-related adverse events of G-CSF treatment.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor therapy improves survival in patients with hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure.

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with HBV-associated ACLF were randomized into two groups: the treatment group and the control group. Twenty-seven patients in the treatment group received G-CSF (5 µg/kg per day, six doses) treatment plus standard therapy, and 28 patients in the control group received standard therapy only. The peripheral CD34(+) cell count was measured consecutively by flow cytometry. Circulating white blood cell count, biochemical parameters, and other clinical data of these patients were recorded and analyzed. All patients were followed up for a period of 3 mo to evaluate the changes in liver function and survival rate. RESULTS: The peripheral neutrophil and CD34(+) cell counts in the G-CSF group increased on day 3 from the onset of therapy, continued to rise on day 7, and remained elevated on day 15 compared to those of the control group. Child-Turcotte-Pugh score of patients in the treatment group was improved on day 30 from the onset of G-CSF therapy, compared to that in the controls (P = 0.041). Model for End-Stage of Liver Disease score of patients in the treatment group was improved on day 7 (P = 0.004) and remained high on day 30 from the onset of G-CSF therapy (P < 0.001) compared to that in controls. After 3 mo of follow-up observation, the survival rate in the treatment group (48.1%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (21.4%) (P = 0.0181). CONCLUSION: G-CSF therapy promoted CD34(+) cell mobilization in patients with HBV-associated ACLF, and improved the liver function and the survival rate of these patients.

Preoperative mobilization of bone marrow-derived cells followed by revascularization surgery: early and long-term outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease (CAD), along with its main complications such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and congestive heart failure (CHF), remains a serious worldwide problem and affects many patients despite the improvement of medical treatment. The possibility of the replacement of the infarcted areas by the re-generation of the myocardial cells has been long discussed and the mobilization of the stem cells from bone marrow (BMCs) to the peripheral blood (PB) induced by cytokines, represents a potential pathway to activate the regenerative process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe BMC mobilization and direct/indirect revascularization in 15 patients operated on for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or mitral valve surgery and/or ventricular remodeling combined to multiple trans-myocardial punctures (Sen technique) in ungraftable non-viable fibrotic areas. RESULTS: Peak values of circulating BMCs were recorded between day +4 and day +6. We had no in-hospital (0-30 days) mortality. All the patients were discharged from the ICU after a median period of 2 days while the in-hospital length of stay was 10.5+4.2 days (range 7-21) and all patients were discharged in good clinical condition. There were two sudden deaths over the mid-term, at postoperative day (POD) 32 and 45 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the combination of BMC mobilization and CABG may be safely performed. However, considering the small series, final conclusions about the benefit of this procedure must await a larger prospective study comparing the role of cytokines alone, myocardial perforation, and the combination of both.

Impact of intensive PBSC mobilization therapy on outcomes following auto-SCT for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The best method to mobilize PBSCs in patients with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) is uncertain. We hypothesized that PBSC mobilization using an intensive chemotherapy regimen would improve outcomes after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in NHL patients at high risk for relapse. Fifty NHL patients were prospectively allocated to intense mobilization with high-dose etoposide plus either high-dose cytarabine or CY if they were 'high risk' for relapse, whereas 30 patients were allocated to nonintense mobilization with CY if they were 'standard risk' (all patients, +/-rituximab). All intensely mobilized patients were hospitalized compared with one-third of nonintensely mobilized patients. The EFS after ASCT was the same between the two groups, but overall survival (OS) was better for intensely mobilized patients (<0.01), including the diffuse large B-cell subgroup (P<0.04). We conclude that the intense mobilization of PBSCs in patients with NHL is more efficient than nonintense mobilization, but with greater toxicity. The equalization of EFS and superiority of OS in patients intensely mobilized to those nonintensely mobilized suggests that a treatment strategy using intensive chemotherapy for mobilization may be improving NHL outcomes after ASCT.

Presence of FLT3 mutations does not impair stem cell mobilization and feasibility of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Fetal liver tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations represent a powerful prognostic indicator in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Further, interaction between FLT3 and its ligand plays a role in normal hematopoiesis. Accordingly, FLT3 mutations may affect mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) and feasibility of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in AML. We analyzed the effect of FLT3 mutations on mobilization of CD34(+) cells and on PBASCT feasibility from 111 patients with AML, with a median age of 58 years and normal karyotype. Overall, 23 patients (21%) had FLT3 mutations. The complete remission rate was 74% and was not influenced by FLT3 mutations (73% for patients with FLT3(-) and 78% for those with FLT3(+); P= .78). The successful mobilization rate was 79% and was comparable for patients with FLT3(-) and with FLT3(+) (P = .42). Median numbers of CD34(+) cells collected were 7.6 x 10(6)/kg and 7.1 x 10(6)/kg for patients with FLT3(-) and those with FLT3(+), respectively (P = .64). Among 73 patients evaluated for mobilization, feasibility of ASCT was 71%, and there was no difference between patients with FLT3(-) (74%) and those with FLT3(+) (61%), P = .43. We conclude that the FLT3 mutations have no influence on mobilization of CD34(+) cells or on feasibility of PBASCT in patients with AML and normal karyotype.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for progressive multiple sclerosis: update of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation autoimmune diseases working party database.

Over the last decade, hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT) has been increasingly used in the treatment of severe progressive autoimmune diseases. We report a retrospective survey of 183 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, recorded in the database of the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (EBMT). Transplant data were available from 178 patients who received an autologous graft. Overall, transplant related mortality (TRM) was 5.3% and was restricted to the period 1995-2000, with no further TRM reported since then. Busulphan-based regimens were significantly associated with TRM. Clinical status at the time of transplant and transplant techniques showed some correlations with toxicity. No toxic deaths were reported among the 53 patients treated with the BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytosine-arabinoside, melphalan)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG) regimen without graft manipulation, irrespective of their clinical condition at the time of the transplant. Improvement or stabilization of neurological conditions occurred in 63% of patients at a median follow-up of 41.7 months, and was not associated with the intensity of the conditioning regimen. In this large series, HSCT was shown as a promising procedure to slow down progression in a subset of patients affected by severe, progressive MS; the safety and feasibility of the procedure can be significantly improved by appropriate patient selection and choice of transplant regimen.

Engraftment syndrome in children undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.

There is limited experience on engraftment syndrome (ES) in children. The present study analyzes the characteristics of ES in pediatric patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells transplantation (PBPCT). From 1993 to 2001, 30 of 156 patients (19.2%) who underwent PBPCT developed ES (skin rash which involved more than 27% of the body surface and temperature >38.3 degrees C with no compatible infectious disease etiology, during neutrophil recovery). Of the 30 patients who developed ES, 20 (66%) developed hypoxia and/or pulmonary infiltrates, seven (23%) had hepatic dysfunction, six (20%) developed renal insufficiency, 16 (53%) showed weight gain and three (10%) experienced transient encephalopathy. Multivariate analysis showed that the only positive predictive factor for developing ES was mobilization with high-dose G-CSF (12 microg/kg twice daily) (RR 3.88, CI 95% 1.73-8.67; P < 0.0005). The overall transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 8.33% and this was significantly higher in the patients who developed ES than in those who did not (23% vs 4.76%; P < 0.0001). We also found a higher morbidity in patients who developed ES, expressed as a statistically significant increase in supportive care (transfusion requirement, parenteral nutrition) and increase in the length of hospital stay. In summary, we have found ES to be the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing autologous PBPCT.

G-CSF modulates cytokine profile of dendritic cells and decreases acute graft-versus-host disease through effects on the donor rather than the recipient.

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is increasingly used instead of bone marrow transplantation, particularly in HLA identical sibling pairs. Despite the presence of significantly increased numbers of T cells in the PBSC graft, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is not increased. We have investigated whether granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration to PBSCT recipients, both with and without donor G-CSF pretreatment, further modulates acute GVHD in a murine model of PBSCT. Recipients of G-CSF mobilized splenocytes showed a significantly improved survival (P<0.001) and a reduction in GVHD score and serum LPS levels compared with control recipients. G-CSF treatment of donors, rather than recipients, had the most significant effect on reducing levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNFalpha) 7 days after transplantation. As a potential mechanism of the reduction in TNFalpha, we demonstrate G-CSF decreased dendritic cells TNFalpha, and interleukin-12 production to lipopolysaccharide. In conclusion, G-CSF modulates GVHD predominantly by its effects on donor cells, reducing the production of TNFalpha. G-CSF treatment of bone marrow transplantation recipients, without pretreatment of the donor, does not have an impact on acute GVHD.