Dentoalveolar effects of skeletally anchored extrusion arch in anterior open bite patients: A prospective clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective clinical trial was to explore the dental and soft tissue changes accompanying the use of skeletally anchored nickel-titanium (NiTi) extrusion arch in the correction of anterior open bite (AOB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty female patients with a mean age of 16.5 ± 1.5 years and a mean dentoalveolar AOB of 2.38±0.7 mm participated in this study. All patients were treated with an maxillary 0.017×0.025-in NiTi extrusion arch, with the aid of miniscrews inserted between the maxillary second premolars and first molars bilaterally, to act as indirect anchorage. Three-dimensional digital models and lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken just before the insertion of the extrusion arch (T0) and after 10 months (T1). Paired-sample t-tests were used in analyzing the data, to evaluate the changes after treatment (T1-T0). A significance level of p < 0.05 was used. RESULTS: AOB was successfully closed in all patients, with a 4.35 ± 0.61 mm increase in the overbite. Maxillary incisors significantly extruded (2.52 ± 1.02 mm) and significantly reclined (5.78 ± 0.77°), with a resultant decrease in the overjet of 1.58 ± 0.5mm. A significant intrusion of maxillary first molars with no change in their inclination was observed. The upper lip showed a significant retraction tendency to the E-plane, and a significant increase in the nasolabial angle was observed. CONCLUSION: The skeletally anchored NiTi extrusion arch was an effective technique in treating AOB, with no adverse effects on the molars.

Comparison of mesiodistal angulations of premolars and molars in anterior open bite subjects with different sagittal malocclusions: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Mesiodistal angulation of premolars and molars can be altered by forces of open bite malocclusion. The aim of this study was to compare the mesiodistal angulations of the posterior teeth in class I, II, and III individuals with anterior open bite (AOB) versus individuals with harmonious occlusion. METHODS: This comparative cross-sectional study used 299 lateral head radiographs of individuals with permanent dentition. There were 4 groups (harmonious occlusion [n=89], Class I open bite [OB] [n=75], Class II OB [n=66], and Class III OB [n=69]). Premolar (1UPM, 2UPM) and molar (1UM, 2UM) angulations were measured relative to the occlusal plane and the palatal or mandibular plane by a trained and calibrated evaluator. ANOVA and Scheffe tests were used for statistical analyses (P<0.05). RESULTS: The mesial angulation of the upper premolars showed greater angulation of between approximately 2° and 5° in the OB groups compared to the harmonious occlusion group (P<0.05). Only in the Class II OB group did the first and second upper molars show distal angulation in relation to the palatal plane (1UM 81.85°±5.42°; 2UM 75.32±7.4°) (P<0.05). The Class III OB group presented the greatest distal angulations of the lower premolars and molars (between 3° to 5° of difference, P<0.05) in relation to those of the harmonious occlusion group. CONCLUSIONS: The upper first premolars in all the AOB groups and the lower second premolars in the Class II OB group had greater mesioangulation. Additionally, the upper molars of the Class II OB group and the lower molars of the Class III OB group showed distoangulation compared with the molars in the group with harmonious occlusion.

Nonextraction anterior open bite treatment with distalization and intrusion.

This case report describes successful orthodontic retreatment for vertical control with nonextraction orthodontic therapy. A 31-year-old woman complained of anterior open bite and crowding. She had slightly protrusive lips but wanted to correct her malocclusion without extraction. Two palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices were used for the distalization of the maxillary arch along with posterior intrusion. Mandibular distalization was performed with Class III elastics. The duration of active treatment was 22 months. The plain and efficient mechanics used contributed to the effective distalization of both arches, the intrusion of the maxillary posterior teeth, and favorable profile changes. The results were still stable at the five-year follow-up period.

Stability of anterior open bite cases treated with upper and lower extrusion arches in adults: a follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the post-treatment stability of anterior open bite (AOB) cases treated with upper and lower extrusion arches in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 patients with AOB were treated with extrusion arches and evaluated for dentoskeletal changes using lateral cephalometric radiographs before treatment (T0), after treatment (T1), and 12 months post-treatment (T2). Patients received bondable tongue spurs and vacuum-formed retainers as post-treatment retention/stability measures for 12 months. Post-treatment stability was further assessed qualitatively by the Photographic Openbite Severity Index. RESULTS: All the cases showed positive overlap between the anterior teeth at the end of orthodontic treatment, and 20 of 23 treated patients attended the recall visit after 12 months. A total of 85% of the cases maintained positive overlap at least 1 year post-treatment, 10% showed edge-to-edge bite, and only 5% showed no overbite. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of AOB in adults with extrusion arches proved to be stable 1 year post-treatment. Changes in the overbite after 1 year of follow-up were not significant.

Predictability of anterior open bite treatment with Invisalign.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior open bite correction with Invisalign has been claimed to have relatively good predictability because of the proposed function of clear aligners to function as occlusal bite-blocks, limiting extrusion of the posterior teeth or possibly even intruding posterior teeth. This proposal, however, remains relatively unsubstantiated. The objective of this study was to investigate and determine the accuracy of Invisalign treatment in correcting anterior open bite by comparing the predicted outcome from ClinCheck to the achieved outcome for the initial aligner sequence. METHODS: A retrospective study used pretreatment and posttreatment intraoral scans and predicted outcomes (ClinCheck) stereolithography files of 76 adult patients from private specialist orthodontic practices. Inclusion criteria comprised nonextraction treatment, with a minimum of 14 dual arch Invisalign aligners. Geomagic Control X software was used to measure overbite and overjet in the pretreatment, posttreatment, and predicted outcomes stereolithography files for each patient. RESULTS: Approximately 66.2% of the programmed open bite closure was expressed compared with the prescribed ClinCheck outcome. The use of posterior occlusal bite-blocks and prescribed movement of teeth via anterior extrusion, posterior intrusion, or a combination of the 2 made no difference to the efficacy of open bite closure. Two-week aligner changes resulted in 0.49 mm more bite closure on average. CONCLUSIONS: The prescribed bite closure in ClinCheck software overestimates the bite closure that is clinically achieved.

Three-dimensional dentoskeletal effects of the Angelalign A6 clear aligners in a skeletal Class II growing patient: A case report.

This case report illustrates the successful nonsurgical and nonextraction treatment of a 12-year-old boy with skeletal Class II deep bite malocclusion undergoing two-phase clear aligner treatment. During A6 mandibular advancement phase, Class II buccal segment relationship was corrected by differential forward growth of the mandible, unplanned distalization of maxillary posterior teeth, and unplanned mesialization of mandibular posterior teeth. The maxillary sagittal curve of occlusion was deepened, the mandibular curve of Spee was not fully levelled, and the maxillary arch experienced downward-backward rotation resulting in premature contact on anterior and posterior open bite. Buccal crown tipping of maxillary posterior teeth was observed after arch expansion. The forward growth of the mandible improved the skeletal relationship, and the advancement of the chin position and sagittal movements of the incisors altered the nose-lip-chin relationship, resulting in an improved profile of the patient. During refinement phase, the posterior open bite was corrected. The mandibular plane angle did not increase throughout the treatment. The patient was satisfied with the aesthetic and functional outcome.

Combined orthodontic-orthognathic management of a patient with generalized short root anomaly and anterior open bite.

Short root anomaly is a rare dental disorder affecting tooth root development. It is characterized by reduced root-to-crown ratios (1:1 or less) and rounded apices. The short roots introduce a potential complication during orthodontic treatment. This case report describes managing a girl with generalized short root anomaly, an open bite, impacted maxillary canines, and a bilateral crossbite. In the first phase of treatment, the maxillary canines were extracted, and the transverse discrepancy was corrected with a bone-borne transpalatal distractor. In the second phase of treatment, a mandibular lateral incisor was removed, fixed appliances were placed in the mandibular arch, and bimaxillary orthognathic surgery was performed. A satisfactory result was obtained without further root shortening, adequate smile esthetics, and 2.5-year posttreatment stability.

Long term stability of a high-angle skeletal Class II open bite treated with high-pull headgear and modified transpalatal arch: A case report.

This case report describes the treatment of an adolescent patient with an Angle Class II malocclusion, severe open bite and overjet, proclined incisors, skeletal Class II anteroposterior dysplasia, high mandibular plane angle and convex profile. The importance of stopping of a prolonged thumb sucking habit, which was a major causative factor of the open bite is discussed. A combination of a high-pull headgear and a modified transpalatal arch with a loop embedded with resin, at a distance from the palate, were used along with an Edgewise appliance. Treatment timing, favourable growth and good patient response led to an optimal outcome with excellent stability of the treatment results five years and five months post-treatment.

Mini-implant assisted posterior intrusion: A quantification of anterior bite closure in nongrowing subjects.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify the vertical radiographic changes in nongrowing patients after treatment of anterior open bites (AOBs) using mini-implant assisted intrusion and to provide a predictive model to quantify the achievable intrusion. METHODS: This retrospective radiographic study evaluated the dentoskeletal changes in adults using orthodontic mini-implants in 53 treated patients with AOB. Radiographs before and after posterior intrusion were utilized to evaluate the associated changes. Conventional cephalometric analyses provided data for assessment. A paired t test was used to identify significant changes. A regression model (best subsets selection algorithm) was generated to quantify the relationship between mini-implant-assisted intrusion and the resultant change in overbite. A matched, untreated control sample was used for comparison. RESULTS: One hundred percent of AOBs were corrected using mini-implant-assisted intrusion of the maxillary molars. The overbite increased by an average of 3.6 mm. The average amount of maxillary first molar intrusion was 2.67 mm. The mandibular first molar moved an average of 1.93 mm closer to the palatal plane because of an average clockwise mandibular rotation of 0.78°. The occlusal plane steepened by an average of 3.95°. If all other inputs are held constant, 1 mm of intrusion of the maxillary first molar results in a 0.86 mm increase in overbite. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-implant-assisted intrusion successfully treated AOB in adults with significant dentoalveolar but no significant skeletal changes. An average of 2.67 mm of intrusion of the maxillary first molars is achievable with this method showing that 1 mm of intrusion of the maxillary first molar increased overbite by 0.86 mm. Longer periods of intrusion resulted in greater amounts of bite closure.

Bias in the superimposition of lateral cephalograms in adult patients with anterior open bite.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior open bite malocclusion can be treated nonsurgically using fixed appliances, clear aligners, or temporary anchorage devices (TADs). Proponents of clear aligners and TADs often attribute bite closure to molar intrusion and counterclockwise rotation of the mandibular plane. These changes may be supported by superimpositions. However, the process of creating a superimposition is subjective and may be influenced by practitioner bias. METHODS: The initial and final lateral cephalograms from 30 adult anterior patients with open bite were used in this study. Ten patients were treated with fixed appliances, 10 with clear aligners, and 10 with TADs. We asked 6 orthodontic graduate students and 6 orthodontic practitioners to complete superimpositions using these radiographs in 3 separate sessions. In the first session, the raters were told that all patients only received treatment with fixed appliances. In the second session, the raters were told that all patients were treated with clear aligners only, and in the third session, they were told all patients were treated with fixed appliances and TADs. Superimpositions were performed using Dolphin software, and each superimposition was saved as a Portable Document Format image. Change in the mandibular plane was the primary outcome and was assessed categorically (closed, no change, opened). Cephalometric values were measured and used to investigate the dental and skeletal changes associated with treatment. RESULTS: Although the raters demonstrated a slight tendency toward the mandibular plane closing or staying the same when told the treatment was clear aligners or TADs, these differences were not statistically significant. A high degree of intrarater and interrater variability in the mandibular plane change was present in all 3 superimposition sessions. The measurements from the lateral cephs showed significant changes for overbite and incisor vertical and angular movements. Almost no change was observed in anterior facial height, mandibular plane angle, or vertical movement of the first molars. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not observe a significant amount of superimposition bias. However, there was considerable intrarater and interrater reliability. This suggests that the same initial and final cephs may be interpreted very differently on the basis of the subjective superimposition of the raters.

Comparison of regional soft tissue changes after bimaxillary rotational surgery between class III deformity with overbite and open bite: A 3D imaging analysis.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to compare regional soft tissue changes between patients with class III overbite and open bite deformities treated with bimaxillary surgery involving clockwise and counter-clockwise mandibular setback, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class III deformity adults receiving Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were grouped according to the incisal occlusion: overbite (n = 30) and open bite (n = 30). Combined cone-beam CT scans and 3D facial photographs preoperative and at least 1-year postoperative were taken to assess the soft tissue changes. RESULTS: Postoperative changes for the overbite and open bite groups included anterior repositioning of nose (-0.8 ± 1.2 mm and -1.1 ± 1.1 mm, respectively) and cheek (-1.9 ± 1.3 mm and -1.7 ± 2.6 mm, respectively), posterior repositioning of chin (5.2 ± 4.0 mm and 4.9 ± 3.2 mm, respectively), and medial (-1.7 ± 2.0 mm and -1.9 ± 2.1 mm, respectively) and posterior (2.7 ± 1.4 mm and 2.8 ± 2.3 mm, respectively) repositioning of bilateral angles. Posterior (1.2 ± 2.0 mm and 5.1 ± 3.3 mm) and inferior (-1.4 ± 2.2 mm and -2.4 ± 2.7 mm) repositioning of upper lip and lower lip occurred in overbite group. Inferior (-2.3 ± 2.4 mm) and superior (3.7 ± 3.4 mm) repositioning of chin occurred in the overbite and open bite groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of class III overbite and open bite deformities with bimaxillary rotational surgery resulted in comparable regional soft tissue changes, except for upper lip, lower lip and chin.

Mandibular morphometric analysis in open bite early treatment relapse subjects: a retrospective observational pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the mandibular shape differences between a group of success and a group of failure Anterior Open Bite (AOB) malocclusion early orthodontic treatment in growing subjects, in order to identify mandibular features of relapse. METHODS: Twenty three patients (7 males, 16 females, 9.3 years ±1,5 years) were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Rome Tor Vergata. Inclusion criteria were: white ancestry, overbite < 0 mm, mixed dentition phase, end-to-end or Class I molar relationship, first skeletal class assessed on lateral cephalograms (0° < ANB < 4°), cervical skeletal maturation CS1-CS2, no previous orthodontic treatment, no congenital diseases. Pre-treatment (T1) lateral cephalograms were acquired. Each patient underwent early orthodontic treatment with Rapid Maxillary Expander (RME) and Bite Block (BB) or Quad-Helix Crib (QHC) until open bite correction. Radiographic records were recollected at T2 (permanent dentition, skeletal cervical maturation CS3-CS4). Mean interval time T2-T1 was 4.2 years ±6 months. According to treatment stability, a Relapse Group (RG 11 patients, 3 M, 8F; 13.7 years ±8 months, 7 subjects treated with RME/BB, 4 with QH/C) and a Success Group (SG, 12 patients, 4 M, 8F; 13.4 ± 10 months, 7 subjects treated with QH/C, 5 with RME/BB) were identified. On the lateral radiographs the mandibular length (Co-Gn), the inferior gonial angle (NGo^GoMe) and the antegonial notch depth (AND) were analyzed. Then the mandibular Geometric Morphometric analysis (GMM) was applied. Intergroup statistically significant differences were found using student's t-tests. Procrustes analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed for the GMM. RESULTS: At T1 no statistically significant differences were found between RG and SG, however higher values of antegonial notch depth were found in RG. T2-T1 comparison showed in RG statistically significant increases in Co-Gn (p = 0.04), NGo^GoMe angle (p = 0.01) and antegonial notch depth (p = 0,04). PC1 confirmed the increase in the antegonial notch depth in RG when compared to SG at T2. CONCLUSIONS: The increased antegonial notch depth associated with the increased mandibular length and the increased gonial angle could be responsible of relapse of early orthodontic treatment in open bite growing subjects.

Mandibular angle morphology in open bite subjects according to the skeletal relationship: a cbct short report / Morfología del ángulo mandibular en sujetos con mordida abierta de acuerdo a la relación esquelética: un informe breve en cbct

Aim: The purpose of this research was to three-dimensionally evaluate the mandibular angle morphology in open bite subjects with different sagittal skeletal relationships. Material and Methods: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 26 subjects (12 men and 14 women) with anterior open bite were evaluated. The sample included 3 groups categorized by their sagittal skeletal relationship (based on ANB angle and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator (APDI)): Class I (n=9), Class II (n=6) and Class III (n=11). The total gonial angle, upper gonial angle, lower gonial angle, intergonial width, interantegonial width and antegonial notch depth were measured. ANOVA and Tukey tests were used for intergroup comparison. The Kruskal Wallis test was also used when necessary. In addition, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate significant correlations between overbite and antegonial notch depth with gonial angle, Frankfurt mandibular plane angle (FMA) and the palatal plane-mandibular plane (PP-MP). Results: A significant difference was only found on the upper gonial angle between Class II and Class III (p=0.047). The upper gonial angle showed greater values (48°±3°) with the mandibular branch toward backward in Class III subjects and lower values (42.42°±4.39°) with the mandibular ramus leaning forward in subjects with Class II skeletal relationship. Besides, only a statistically significant correlation was found between overbite and the lower gonial angle (r=-0.418, p=0.034). Conclusion: Mandibular angle morphology is similar in anterior open bite subjects with different sagittal skeletal relationships, except for the upper gonial angle which is increased in Class III and decreased in Class II subjects with open bite. Lower gonial angle is negatively correlated with overbite. This difference should be considered by orthodontists when planning their treatments.

Objetivo: El propósito de esta investigación fue evaluar tridimensionalmente la morfología del ángulo mandibular en sujetos de mordida abierta con diferentes relaciones esqueléticas sagitales. Material y Métodos: Se evaluaron imágenes de tomografía computarizada de haz cónico (CBCT) de 26 sujetos (12 hombres y 14 mujeres) con mordida abierta anterior. La muestra incluyó 3 grupos categorizados por su relación esquelética sagital (según el ángulo ANB y el indicador de displasia anteroposterior (APDI)): Clase I (n=9), Clase II (n=6) y Clase III (n=11). Se midieron el ángulo goniaco total, el ángulo goniaco superior, el ángulo goniaco inferior, el ancho intergonial, el ancho interantegonial y la profundidad de la entalladura antegonial. Se utilizaron las pruebas ANOVA y Tukey para la comparación intergrupal. La prueba de Kruskal Wallis también se utilizó cuando fue necesario. Además, se calculó el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson para evaluar correlaciones significativas entre la sobremordida y la profundidad de la entalladura antegonial con el ángulo goniaco, el ángulo del plano mandibular de Frankfurt (FMA) y el plano palatino-plano mandibular (PP-MP). Resultados: Solo se encontró una diferencia significativa en el ángulo goniaco superior entre la Clase II y la Clase III (p=0.047). El ángulo gonial superior mostró valores mayores (48°±3°) con la rama mandibular hacia atrás en sujetos Clase III y valores más bajos (42,42°±4,39°) con la rama mandibular inclinada hacia adelante en sujetos con Clase II esquelética relación. Además, solo se encontró una correlación estadísticamente significativa entre la sobremordida y el ángulo goniaco inferior (r= -0,418, p= 0,034). Conclusión: La morfología del ángulo mandibular es similar en sujetos con mordida abierta anterior con diferentes relaciones esqueléticas sagitales, excepto por el ángulo goniaco superior que aumenta en la Clase III y disminuye en sujetos de Clase II con mordida abierta. El ángulo gonial inferior se correlaciona negativamente con la sobremordida. Los ortodoncistas deben considerar esta diferencia al planificar sus tratamientos.

Condylar degeneration in anterior open bite patients: A cone beam computed tomography study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of condylar degeneration in patients with anterior open bites (AOB). STUDY DESIGN: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 194 patients with AOB (108 with skeletal open bites and 86 with dental open bites) and 100 patients serving as controls were included in this retrospective study. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists categorized each of the 588 condyles as normal, degenerative-active, or degenerative-repair. The χ2 analysis with Bonferroni adjustment was used to evaluate the relationship of condylar status (normal vs degenerative) to anterior open bites. RESULTS: Of the 103 degenerative condyles, there were 59 in the group with skeletal open bites, 14 in the group with dental open bites, and 30 in the control group. Condylar degeneration occurred twice as frequently in patients with skeletal open bites as it did in the control group (P < .0001). Conversely, a greater frequency of normal condyles was found in the group of patients with dental open bites (P = .0002). The group with skeletal open bites also showed a significantly higher frequency of bilateral degenerative condyles (P = .0001). The frequency of condylar degeneration did not differ significantly between female and male individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Degenerative condylar change was significantly more likely in patients with skeletal open bites and less likely in patients with dental open bites.

Three-dimensional volumetric evaluation of dental pulp cavity/tooth ratio in anterior open bite malocclusion using cone beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare pulp cavity/tooth volume ratio of maxillary permanent teeth between patients exhibiting anterior open bite malocclusion and those exhibiting anterior normal overbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D dental images from 44 patients aged between 15 and 29 years were analyzed. The DICOM files of all dental images were imported into an image processing software for calculating pulp cavity volume and tooth volume. Differences of pulp cavity volume, tooth volume, and pulp cavity/tooth volume ratio of each tooth type from both types of occlusions were analyzed using the independent t test. The intra-class correlation coefficient was used to evaluate intra-examiner reliability. RESULTS: The means of pulp cavity/tooth volume ratio in anterior open bite group were significantly greater than those in anterior normal overbite group (central incisor p = 0.001; lateral incisor p = 0.00025 and canine p = 0.004). The means of root canal/root volume ratio in anterior open bite group were significantly greater than anterior normal overbite group (central incisor p = 0.00001; lateral incisor p = 0.00007; and canine p = 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences of the means of pulp chamber/crown volume was observed. CONCLUSION: Anterior open bite malocclusion might lead to an increase of the pulp cavity volume and decrease of the tooth volume due to occlusal hypofunction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthodontic force should be carefully determined in anterior open bite patient due to the greater root canal volume and lesser root volume.

Multiloop edgewise archwire treatment for a patient with a severe anterior open bite and amelogenesis imperfecta.

Amelogenesis imperfecta is a rare hereditary disorder that affects dental enamel and is often associated with an anterior open bite. Orthodontic treatment of a 16-year-old female patient with hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta and a 9-mm anterior open bite was presented. Radiographic examination revealed a steep mandibular plane angle, an increased lower face height, a Class II skeletal pattern, and a convex profile. Additionally, the patient had stainless steel crowns on all upper and lower posterior teeth and composite veneers on the upper anterior teeth. The patient was treated nonsurgically using a multiloop edgewise archwire (MEAW). MEAW mechanics allowed for successful correction of the anterior open bite, with significant reduction in the mandibular plane angle and improvement in the patient's profile. No fixed retainers were used, and the results remained stable 78 months after removal of orthodontic appliances. MEAW mechanics should be considered for patients with large anterior open bites, although this technique requires excellent patient compliance.

Cephalometric evaluation of intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth by miniscrews in the treatment of open bite.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrews for skeletal anchorage during anterior open bite treatment using cephalometric radiographs. METHODS: This study sample included 20 patients (mean age, 14.71; standard deviation, 1.77) with an anterior open bite. A total of 250 g of force was applied using elastic chains with anchorage from palatal miniscrew to an occlusal splint covering the posterior maxillary teeth. Cephalograms were obtained at the beginning of the treatment when the appliance was first applied and at the 8-month visit when treatment was completed. Paired t tests were used to identify statistically significant differences between initial and final measurements of skeletal and dental parameters. RESULTS: A decrease of 2.72 ± 1.90° in the SN-GoGn angle and 3.63 ± 1.87 mm in the anterior height (N-Me) parameter in the cephalometric evaluations indicated a significant improvement of vertically increased facial dimensions, with the intrusion of the maxillary posterior teeth (P <0.05). Anterior rotation of the mandible was determined by a 1.76 ± 1.09° increase in the SNB angle and a 1.86 ± 0.90° decrease in the ANB angle (P <0.05). Reductions in the open bite amount by 5.8 ± 0.90 mm, Mx6-SN by 4.00 ± 1.01 mm, and Mx6-PP by 4.01 ± 1.00 mm were indicative of significant intrusion in the maxillary posterior teeth (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirmed that palatal miniscrew and maxillary occlusal splint caused intrusion of the maxillary posterior teeth, a decrease in the anterior open bite, and mandibular advancement, with anterior rotation after the maxillary posterior intrusion. We concluded that the treatment method in our study was appropriate for patients with Class I and mild Class II malocclusions and open bite anomalies.

Computer-aided surgical workflow in a surgery - First orthognathic approach to correct anterior open bite in a young adult with temporomandibular disorders.

An 18-year-old female patient with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) history sought medical care in orthodontic-orthognathic interdisciplinary department with chief complaint of anterior open bite. After splint therapy to seat the condylar into the musculo-skeletally stable position, a surgery-first approach was formulated assisted by 3D virtual planning and transferred to the surgery by computer-aided manufacturing splint. No TMD symptom reoccurrence was reported or noted. Stable occlusion and satisfactory facial aesthetics were achieved. In the 18-month follow-up, no clinically significant open bite relapse occurred. This case report describes the remarkable role that computer-assisted surgical simulation could play throughout the surgical-orthodontic procedure to correct the skeletal open bite deformity.

Comparison and reproducibility of three methods for maxillary digital dental model registration in open bite patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and assess the reproducibility of 3 methods for registration of maxillary digital dental models in patients with anterior open bite. Settings and sample population Digital dental models of 16 children with an anterior open bite in the mixed dentition were obtained before (T1) and after 12 months of treatment with bonded spurs (T2). METHODS: Landmarks were placed on all T2 models and 3 registration methods (R1, R2 and R3) were independently performed by 2 observers. R1 was based on 10 landmarks placed on posterior teeth. R2 was based on 5 landmarks on the palate (2 anterior, 2 posterior and 1 central). R3 used regions of interest around the 5 palatal landmarks used in R2. The differences between the registration methods were calculated by comparing the mean differences and standard deviations between the corresponding x, y and z coordinates of 6 corresponding landmarks in the T2 registered models. Repeated measures analysis of variance followed by post-hoc Bonferroni tests were used for comparisons (P < .05). The agreement between methods and the intra and interobserver reproducibility were assessed with Bland-Altman tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Comparisons of R2 with R3 methods showed greater agreement, mean differences ≤0.50 mm for all landmarks, than comparisons of R1 with R2, and R1 with R3, mean differences >0.50 mm for most of the y and z coordinates (P < .05). The R1 and R3 methods presented excellent intra and interobserver reproducibility and R2 method had moderate interobserver reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal assessments of open bite treatment using digital dental models could consider the posterior teeth and/or the palate as references. The R1 and R3 methods showed adequate reproducibility and yield different quantitative results. The choice will depend on the posterior teeth changes and dental models' characteristics.

Intermaxillary elastics on skeletal anchorage and MARPE to treat a class III maxillary retrognathic open bite adolescent: A case report.

Class III malocclusion when accompanied with transverse and vertical maxillomandibular discrepancies such as posterior crossbite and vertical open bite leads to complicated orthodontic treatment. Proper diagnosis and treatment planning are important in such patients for a successful orthodontic outcome. A common treatment approach for patients with class III malocclusion is to wait for the completion of growth and plan orthognathic surgery in conjunction with orthodontic treatment. However, performing no treatment and waiting for growth to be completed during teen years could lead to negative effects on the patient's self-esteem. In such cases, a non-surgical option with skeletal anchorage could be used to correct the malocclusion without surgical intervention. This case report shows that in patients with severe class III malocclusion, skeletal anchorage can be used for the correction of anterior crossbite with intermaxillary elastics.