A systematic review of the literature reporting on remote monitoring epileptic seizure detection devices.

BACKGROUND: Early detection and alert notification of an impending seizure for people with epilepsy have the potential to reduce Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Current remote monitoring seizure detection devices for people with epilepsy are designed to support real-time monitoring of their vital health parameters linked to seizure alert notification. An understanding of the rapidly growing literature on remote seizure detection devices is essential to address the needs of people with epilepsy and their carers. AIM: This review aims to examine the technical characteristics, device performance, user preference, and effectiveness of remote monitoring seizure detection devices. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review referenced to PRISMA guidelines was used. RESULTS: A total of 1095 papers were identified from the initial search with 30 papers included in the review. Sixteen non-invasive remote monitoring seizure detection devices are currently available. Such seizure detection devices were found to have inbuilt intelligent sensor functionality to monitor electroencephalography, muscle movement, and accelerometer-based motion movement for detecting seizures remotely. Current challenges of these devices for people with epilepsy include skin irritation due to the type of patch electrode used and false alarm notifications, particularly during physical activity. The tight-fitted accelerometer-type devices are reported as uncomfortable from a wearability perspective for long-term monitoring. Also, continuous recording of physiological signals and triggering alert notifications significantly reduce the battery life of the devices. The literature highlights that 3.2 out of 5 people with epilepsy are not using seizure detection devices because of the cost and appearance of the device. CONCLUSION: Seizure detection devices can potentially reduce morbidity and mortality for people with epilepsy. Therefore, further collaboration of clinicians, technical experts, and researchers is needed for the future development of these devices. Finally, it is important to always take into consideration the expectations and requirements of people with epilepsy and their carers to facilitate the next generation of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.

Impaired post-sleep apnea autonomic arousals in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Sudden and unexpected deaths in epilepsy (SUDEP) pathophysiology may involve an interaction between respiratory dysfunction and sleep/wake state regulation. We investigated whether patients with epilepsy exhibit impaired sleep apnea-related arousals. METHODS: Patients with drug-resistant (N = 20) or drug-sensitive (N = 20) epilepsy and obstructive sleep apnea, as well as patients with sleep apnea but without epilepsy (controls, N = 20) were included. We explored (1) the respiratory arousal threshold based on nadir oxygen saturation, apnea-hypopnea index, and fraction of hypopnea among respiratory events; (2) the cardiac autonomic response to apnea/hypopnea quantified as percentages of changes from the baseline in RR intervals (RRI), high (HF) and low (LF) frequency powers, and LF/HF. RESULTS: The respiratory arousal threshold did not differ between groups. At arousal onset, RRI decreased (-9.42%) and LF power (179%) and LF/HF ratio (190%) increased. This was followed by an increase in HF power (118%), p < 0.05. The RRI decrease was lower in drug-resistant (-7.40%) than in drug-sensitive patients (-9.94%) and controls (-10.91%), p < 0.05. LF and HF power increases were higher in drug-resistant (188%/126%) than in drug-sensitive patients (172%/126%) and controls (177%/115%), p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac reactivity following sleep apnea is impaired in drug-resistant epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: This autonomic dysfunction might contribute to SUDEP pathophysiology.

Asymmetrical cortical surface area decrease in epilepsy patients with postictal generalized electroencephalography suppression.

Postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression is a possible electroencephalographic marker for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. We aimed to investigate the cortical surface area abnormalities in epilepsy patients with postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression. We retrospectively included 30 epilepsy patients with postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression (PGES+), 21 epilepsy patients without postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression (PGES-), and 30 healthy controls. Surface-based analysis on high-resolution T1-weighted images was conducted and cortical surface areas were compared among the three groups, alongside correlation analyses with seizure-related clinical variables. Compared with PGES- group, we identified reduced surface area in the bilateral insula with more extensive distribution in the right hemisphere in PGES+ group. The reduced right insular surface area was associated with younger seizure-onset age. When compared with healthy controls, PGES- group presented reduced surface area in the left caudal middle frontal gyrus; PGES+ group presented more widespread surface area reductions in the right posterior cingulate gyrus, left postcentral gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and middle temporal gyrus. Our results suggested cortical microstructural impairment in patients with postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression. The significant surface area reductions in the insular cortex supported the autonomic network involvement in the pathology of postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression, and its right-sided predominance suggested the potential shared abnormal brain network for postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.

Minimum clinical utility standards for wearable seizure detectors: A simulation study.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy management employs self-reported seizure diaries, despite evidence of seizure underreporting. Wearable and implantable seizure detection devices are now becoming more widely available. There are no clear guidelines about what levels of accuracy are sufficient. This study aimed to simulate clinical use cases and identify the necessary level of accuracy for each. METHODS: Using a realistic seizure simulator (CHOCOLATES), a ground truth was produced, which was then sampled to generate signals from simulated seizure detectors of various capabilities. Five use cases were evaluated: (1) randomized clinical trials (RCTs), (2) medication adjustment in clinic, (3) injury prevention, (4) sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) prevention, and (5) treatment of seizure clusters. We considered sensitivity (0%-100%), false alarm rate (FAR; 0-2/day), and device type (external wearable vs. implant) in each scenario. RESULTS: The RCT case was efficient for a wide range of wearable parameters, though implantable devices were preferred. Lower accuracy wearables resulted in subtle changes in the distribution of patients enrolled in RCTs, and therefore higher sensitivity and lower FAR values were preferred. In the clinic case, a wide range of sensitivity, FAR, and device type yielded similar results. For injury prevention, SUDEP prevention, and seizure cluster treatment, each scenario required high sensitivity and yet was minimally influenced by FAR. SIGNIFICANCE: The choice of use case is paramount in determining acceptable accuracy levels for a wearable seizure detection device. We offer simulation results for determining and verifying utility for specific use case and specific wearable parameters.

Epilepsy's effect on cardiac rhythm and the autonomic nervous system.

OBJECTIVE: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy is the most common cause of death in young patients with epilepsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in interictal electrocardiogram parameters and sympathetic skin responses as markers of autonomic dysfunction in patients with epilepsy and to determine their effects on the type and duration of epilepsy, frequency of seizures, and responses to treatment. METHODS: A total of 97 patients with epilepsy and 94 healthy controls were recruited. We recorded their clinical and demographic characteristics and analyzed sympathetic skin response latency and amplitude, electrocardiogram recordings, and seven cardiac rhythm parameters: P-wave duration, PR segment, QRS duration, QT interval, QT interval distribution, Tpe duration, and Tpe/QT interval ratio. RESULTS: P-wave durations, T-wave durations, QT and QT interval durations, and Tpe and sympathetic skin response latency were significantly longer among patients with epilepsy than the controls, and their heart rate was significantly lower. However, sympathetic skin response latency and heart rate were negatively correlated, and T-wave duration, QT duration, QT interval duration, and Tpe were positively correlated. CONCLUSION: Our results from interictal electrocardiograms indicate clinically significant arrhythmias among patients with epilepsy and the correlation of such arrhythmias with sympathetic skin responses. Thus, noninvasive tests that evaluate the autonomic system should be used to predict the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy among patients with epilepsy.

Seizures and Sudden Death Beyond SUDEP.

Many physicians and researchers are familiar with the tragic phenomenon known as sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), the leading cause of postneonatal mortality in high-resource countries. A less familiar category of unexplained deaths is the problem of sudden unexplained death in childhood (SUDC), a more rare and unusual presentation of sudden death in children who are no longer infants and whose reasons for death defy explanation. A substantial body of research in SUDC now supports the possibility of an overlap with epilepsy and associated sudden death in that context (SUDEP). Stemming from the first contemporary reports of SUDC, we have learned that a disproportionate number of these children have personal and/or family histories of febrile seizures,1 in many cases, inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.2 Their febrile seizures can be associated with abnormalities in their temporal lobes,3,4 including bilamination of the dentate gyrus and other findings conventionally associated with temporal lobe epilepsy, implicating potential epilepsy-related mechanisms.5 Further evaluation of this emerging epilepsy-related phenotype has led to the identification of genetic variants in SCN1A and other epilepsy-associated genes,6,7 moving SUDC away from being considered an unexplained phenomenon to one where the working hypothesis includes a role for genetic predisposition and epilepsy-like mechanisms in the deaths, even without an established history of epilepsy. Nonetheless, because the terminal events of these seemingly healthy children are unexpected and unobserved, the clinical manifestations of whatever underlying vulnerabilities exist-generally discovered posthumously-remain a matter of speculation.

Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy During Ambulatory Video-EEG Monitoring at Home.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We report the recording of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in a 68-year-old man with recent onset cryptogenic epilepsy, captured by video-EEG monitoring, at home in the company of his wife while sitting in a chair. This was only the third seizure of his life, the first 2 occurring 19 days previously. This rare event is a novel case of SUDEP recorded with ambulatory video EEG at home. The video is included by permission. METHODS: Electroclinical seizure and cardiorespiratory analysis was ascertained using a combination of video, EEG (Natus, standard 10-20 electrode), ECG, and sound. Respiratory rate was ascertained based on chest, abdominal, and facial respiratory movements, together with video and audio. RESULTS: The unique video-EEG recording illustrates the time course of apnea and bradycardia leading to terminal apnea in conjunction with prolonged postictal generalized EEG suppression. DISCUSSION: This case is illustrative of a wide spectrum of SUDEP cases, ranging from the highly intractable to the patient with newly diagnosed epilepsy with very few seizures. It illustrates that patients can succumb to SUDEP while awake and in the sitting position (1) very early in their epilepsy course, (2) without recognized risk factors other than generalized convulsive seizures, (3) even when accompanied.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and ictal asystole in patients with autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: As autoimmune encephalitis (AE) often involves the mesial temporal structures which are known to be involved in both sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and ictal asystole (IA), it may represent a good model to study the physiopathology of these phenomena. Herein, we systematically reviewed the occurrence of SUDEP and IA in AE. METHODS: We searched 4 databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) for studies published between database inception and December 20, 2022, according to the PRISMA guidelines. We selected articles reporting cases of definite/probable/possible/near-SUDEP or IA in patients with possible/definite AE, or with histopathological signs of AE. RESULTS: Of 230 records assessed, we included 11 cases: 7 SUDEP/near-SUDEP and 4 IA. All patients with IA were female. The median age at AE onset was 30 years (range: 15-65), and the median delay between AE onset and SUDEP was 11 months; 0.9 months for IA. All the patients presented new-onset seizures, and 10/11 also manifested psychiatric, cognitive, or amnesic disorders. In patients with SUDEP, 2/7 were antibody-positive (1 anti-LGI1, 1 anti-GABABR); all IA cases were antibody-positive (3 anti-NMDAR, 1 anti-GAD65). Six patients received steroid bolus, 3 intravenous immunoglobulin, and 3 plasmapheresis. A pacemaker was implanted in 3 patients with IA. The 6 survivors improved after treatment. DISCUSSION: SUDEP and IA can be linked to AE, suggesting a role of the limbic system in their pathogenesis. IA tends to manifest in female patients with temporal lobe seizures early in AE, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment.

A systematic literature review on the global epidemiology of Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Prevalence, incidence, diagnosis, and mortality.

Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) are rare developmental and epileptic encephalopathies associated with seizure and nonseizure symptoms. A comprehensive understanding of how many individuals are affected globally, the diagnostic journey they face, and the extent of mortality associated with these conditions is lacking. Here, we summarize and evaluate published data on the epidemiology of DS and LGS in terms of prevalence, incidence, diagnosis, genetic mutations, and mortality and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) rates. The full study protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022316930). After screening 2172 deduplicated records, 91 unique records were included; 67 provided data on DS only, 17 provided data on LGS only, and seven provided data on both. Case definitions varied considerably across studies, particularly for LGS. Incidence and prevalence estimates per 100 000 individuals were generally higher for LGS than for DS (LGS: incidence proportion = 14.5-28, prevalence = 5.8-60.8; DS: incidence proportion = 2.2-6.5, prevalence = 1.2-6.5). Diagnostic delay was frequently reported for LGS, with a wider age range at diagnosis reported than for DS (DS, 1.6-9.2 years; LGS, 2-15 years). Genetic screening data were reported by 63 studies; all screened for SCN1A variants, and only one study specifically focused on individuals with LGS. Individuals with DS had a higher mortality estimate per 1000 person-years than individuals with LGS (DS, 15.84; LGS, 6.12) and a lower median age at death. SUDEP was the most frequently reported cause of death for individuals with DS. Only four studies reported mortality information for LGS, none of which included SUDEP. This systematic review highlights the paucity of epidemiological data available for DS and especially LGS, demonstrating the need for further research and adoption of standardized diagnostic criteria.

Personalization of SUDEP risk: A survey of transient subclinical comorbid changes.

OBJECTIVE: Preclinical data report within subject modifiable ailments emerge weeks prior to SUDEP, including sleep disorders and cardiorespiratory changes; findings which support anecdotal clinical data. Here, we bridge preclinical findings with future clinical/preclinical studies, and survey whether caretakers or family members of victims noticed transient changes prior to SUDEP. The aim of this pilot study is to identify potential modifiable changes that may synergistically increase SUDEP risk for future research. METHODS: A mobile electronic survey was posted on SUDEP community websites. The survey queried whether changes in seizures, sleep, physical well-being, emotional well-being, cognition, breathing, or heart rate were noticed before SUDEP. RESULTS: The most profound finding was that 85% of victims had multiple transient ailments prior to SUDEP. Changes in seizures (28/54), and sleep (30/58) occurred in more than 50% of the victims and represent the most influential changes identified. The second and third most influential changes were a reduction in physical well-being (25/57) and emotional well-being (26/56). Changes were observed within the last two months of life in approximately one third of the cases, and more than four months prior to SUDEP in approximately one third of cases, indicating a potential time frame for proactive preventative strategies. Respondents also noted changes in cognition (16/55), breathing (9/54) or heart rate (8/55). Data indicate these changes may be associated with increased SUDEP risk within subject. Study limitations include the responses were based on memory, there was a potential for data to be over reported, and caretakers were not prompted to observe changes a priori, thus some existing changes may have gone unnoticed. SIGNIFICANCE: Data support the preclinical findings that transient, subclinical (i.e., not severe enough to require medical intervention), modifiable ailments may increase risk of SUDEP. This suggests that just as an epilepsy type can change over a lifetime and epilepsy type-specific treatments can reduce SUDEP risk, further personalization of SUDEP risk will improve our understanding as to whether variables contribute to risk differently across lifespan. Thus, with a dynamic capacity to change, differing factors may contribute to the distribution of risk probability within an individual at any given time. Understanding whether different combinations of transient changes are specific to epilepsy type, age, or sex needs to be determined to move the field forward in hopes of developing a personalized approach to preventative strategies.

Imaging biomarkers of sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a review.

In recent years, imaging has emerged as a promising source of several intriguing biomarkers in epilepsy, due to the impressive growth of imaging technology, supported by methodological advances and integrations of post-processing techniques. Bearing in mind the mutually influencing connection between sleep and epilepsy, we focused on sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE) and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), aiming to make order and clarify possible clinical utility of emerging multimodal imaging biomarkers of these two epilepsy-related entities commonly occurring during sleep. Regarding SHE, advanced structural techniques might soon emerge as a promising source of diagnostic and predictive biomarkers, tailoring a targeted therapeutic (surgical) approach for MRI-negative subjects. Functional and metabolic imaging may instead unveil SHE's extensive and night-related altered brain networks, providing insights into distinctions and similarities with non-epileptic sleep phenomena, such as parasomnias. SUDEP is considered a storm that strikes without warning signals, but objective subtle structural and functional alterations in autonomic, cardiorespiratory, and arousal centers are present in patients eventually experiencing SUDEP. These alterations could be seen both as susceptibility and diagnostic biomarkers of the underlying pathological ongoing loop ultimately ending in death. Finally, given that SHE and SUDEP are rare phenomena, most evidence on the topic is derived from small single-center experiences with scarcely comparable results, hampering the possibility of performing any meta-analytic approach. Multicenter, longitudinal, well-designed studies are strongly encouraged.

Medication adherence, anxiety and depression, and safety of epileptic patients following receiving information about sudden unexpected deaths in epilepsy: A quasi-experimental study with before/after design.

INTRODUCTION: It is very important to provide epileptic patients with sufficient knowledge of SUDEP and empower them regarding its prevention. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the educational intervention of receiving information about SUDEP on medication adherence, anxiety and depression, and the safety of epileptic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 60 epilepsy patients referred to the specialized epilepsy clinic of Imam Hossein Hospital in Tehran, Iran, from April 2022 to February 2023. Data were collected by the Morisky medication adherence scale, hospital anxiety and depression scales, and the researcher-made checklists of bathing safety, sleep safety, and patient seizure preparation before and after the intervention. The educational intervention was conducted through the video and pamphlet regarding knowledge about SUDEP. Wilcoxon and paired t-tests were used to compare the data changes following the intervention. RESULTS: Most patients were male, with an age range of 18 to 29 years old. The mean score of anxiety and depression before and after the educational intervention did not show a statistically significant difference (P = 0.928); however, the mean scores of medication adherence, bathing safety, sleep safety, and preparation for seizure after the educational intervention increased significantly (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Knowledge about SUDEP would be able to encourage epileptic patients to better adhere to medication; and make them empower regarding seizure preparation, bathing safety, and sleep safety.

Critical incidents, nocturnal supervision, and caregiver knowledge on SUDEP in patients with Dravet syndrome: A prospective multicenter study in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the monitoring, interventions, and occurrence of critical, potentially life-threatening incidents in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) and caregivers' knowledge about sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study of patients with DS and their caregivers in Germany consisted of a questionnaire and prospective diary querying the disease characteristics and demographic data of patients and caregivers. RESULTS: Our analysis included 108 questionnaires and 82 diaries. Patients with DS were 49.1% male (n = 53), with a mean age of 13.5 (SD ± 10.0 years) and primary caregivers were 92.6% (n = 100) female, with a mean age of 44.7 (SD ± 10.6 years). Monitoring devices were used regularly by 75.9% (n = 82) of caregivers, and most monitored daily/nightly. Frequently used devices were pulse oximeters (64.6%), baby monitors (64.6%), thermometers (24.1%), and Epi-Care (26.8%). Younger caregiver and patient age and history of status epilepticus were associated with increased use of monitoring, and 81% of monitor users reported having avoided a critical incident with nocturnal monitoring. The need for resuscitation due to cardiac or respiratory arrest was reported by 22 caregivers (20.4%), and most cases (72.7%) were associated with a seizure. Caregivers reported frequently performing interventions at night, including oropharyngeal suction, oxygenation, personal hygiene, and change of body position. Most caregivers were well informed about SUDEP (n = 102; 94%) and monitored for a lateral or supine body position; however, only 39.8% reported receiving resuscitation training, whereas 52.8% (n = 57) knew what to do in case the child's breathing or heart activity failed. SIGNIFICANCE: Critical incidents and the need for resuscitation are reported frequently by caregivers and may be related to high mortality and SUDEP rates in DS. Resuscitation training is welcomed by caregivers and should be continuously provided. Oxygen monitoring devices are frequently used and considered useful by caregivers.

Volumetric gray matter findings in autonomic network regions of people with focal epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies of people with focal epilepsies revealed gray matter (GM) alterations in brain regions involved in cardiorespiratory regulation, which have been linked to the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). It remains unclear whether the type and localization of epileptogenic lesions influence the occurrence of such alterations. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that VBM alterations of autonomic network regions are independent of epileptogenic lesions and that they reveal structural underpinnings of SUDEP risk, VBM was performed in 100 people with focal epilepsies without an epileptogenic lesion identifiable on MRI (mean age ± standard deviation = 35 ± 11 years, 56 female). The group was further stratified in high (sample size n = 29) and low risk of SUDEP (n = 71). GM volumes were compared between these two subgroups and to 100 matched controls. RESULTS: People with epilepsy displayed higher GM volume in both amygdalae and parahippocampal gyri and lower GM volume in the cerebellum and occipital (p<.05, familywise error corrected). There were no significant volumetric differences between high and low SUDEP risk subgroups. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that autonomic networks are structurally altered in people with focal epilepsy and they question VBM as a suitable method to show structural correlates of the SUDEP risk score.

Reduced long-term mortality after successful resective epilepsy surgery: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated all-cause and epilepsy-related mortality in patients operated with resective epilepsy surgery and in non-operated patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Our hypothesis was that patients who proceed to surgery have lower mortality over time compared with non-operated patients. METHOD: Data from 1329 adults and children from the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Register and 666 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who had undergone presurgical work-up but not been operated were analysed. The operated patients had follow-ups between 2 and 20 years. We used the Swedish Cause of Death Register to identify deaths. Autopsy reports were collected for patients with suspected sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for mortality and SUDEP. RESULTS: SUDEP accounted for 30% of all deaths. Surgery was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.9), also when adjusted for age, sex and tonic-clonic seizures at inclusion. The benefit of surgery seemed to persist and possibly even increase after 15 years of follow-up. Risk factors of mortality for operated patients were persisting seizures and living alone. Of the operated patients, 37% had seizures, and these had a higher risk of mortality (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.0) and SUDEP (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.3) compared with patients with seizure freedom at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population-based epilepsy surgery cohort, operated patients had a lower all-cause mortality compared with non-operated patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Seizure freedom was the most important beneficial factor for both all-cause mortality and SUDEP among operated patients.

Are we there yet? A critical evaluation of sudden and unexpected death in epilepsy models.

Although animal models have helped to elaborate meaningful hypotheses about the pathophysiology of sudden and unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), specific prevention strategies are still lacking, potentially reflecting the limitations of these models and the intrinsic difficulties of investigating SUDEP. The interpretation of preclinical data and their translation to diagnostic and therapeutic developments in patients thus require a high level of confidence in their relevance to model the human situation. Preclinical models of SUDEP are heterogeneous and include rodent and nonrodent species. A critical aspect is whether the animals have isolated seizures exclusively induced by a specific trigger, such as models where seizures are elicited by electrical stimulation, pharmacological intervention, or DBA mouse strains, or whether they suffer from epilepsy with spontaneous seizures, with or without spontaneous SUDEP, either of nongenetic epilepsy etiology or from genetically based developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. All these models have advantages and potential disadvantages, but it is important to be aware of these limitations to interpret data appropriately in a translational perspective. The majority of models with spontaneous seizures are of a genetic basis, whereas SUDEP cases with a genetic basis represent only a small proportion of the total number. In almost all models, cardiorespiratory arrest occurs during the course of the seizure, contrary to that in patients observed at the time of death, potentially raising the issue of whether we are studying models of SUDEP or models of periseizure death. However, some of these limitations are impossible to avoid and can in part be dependent on specific features of SUDEP, which may be difficult to model. Several preclinical tools are available to address certain gaps in SUDEP pathophysiology, which can be used to further validate current preclinical models.

Temporal manipulation of the Scn1a gene reveals its essential role in adult brain function.

Dravet syndrome is a severe epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by drug-resistant epilepsy, severe cognitive and behavioural deficits, with increased risk of sudden unexpected death (SUDEP). It is caused by haploinsufficiency of SCN1A gene encoding for the α-subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.1. Therapeutic approaches aiming to upregulate the healthy copy of SCN1A gene to restore its normal expression levels are being developed. However, whether Scn1a gene function is required only during a specific developmental time-window or, alternatively, if its physiological expression is necessary in adulthood is untested up to now. We induced Scn1a gene haploinsufficiency at two ages spanning postnatal brain development (P30 and P60) and compared the phenotypes of those mice to Scn1a perinatally induced mice (P2), recapitulating all deficits of Dravet mice. Induction of heterozygous Nav1.1 mutation at P30 and P60 elicited susceptibility to the development of both spontaneous and hyperthermia-induced seizures and SUDEP rates comparable to P2-induced mice, with symptom onset accompanied by the characteristic GABAergic interneuron dysfunction. Finally, delayed Scn1a haploinsufficiency induction provoked hyperactivity, anxiety and social attitude impairment at levels comparable to age matched P2-induced mice, while it was associated with a better cognitive performance, with P60-induced mice behaving like the control group. Our data show that maintenance of physiological levels of Nav1.1 during brain development is not sufficient to prevent Dravet symptoms and that long-lasting restoration of Scn1a gene expression would be required to grant optimal clinical benefit in patients with Dravet syndrome.

Exome analysis focusing on epilepsy-related genes in children and adults with sudden unexplained death.

PURPOSE: Genetic studies in sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and sudden unexplained death (SUD) cohorts have indicated that cardiovascular diseases might have contributed to sudden unexpected death in 20-35 % of autopsy-negative cases. Sudden unexpected death can also occur in people with epilepsy, termed as sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). The pathophysiological mechanisms of SUDEP are not well understood, but are likely multifactorial, including seizure-induced hypoventilation and arrhythmias as well as genetic risk factors. The sudden death of some of the SIDS/SUD victims might also be explained by genetic epilepsy, therefore this study aimed to expand the post-mortem genetic analysis of SIDS/SUD cases to epilepsy-related genes. METHODS: Existing whole-exome sequencing data from our 155 SIDS and 45 SUD cases were analyzed, with a focus on 365 epilepsy-related genes. Nine of the SUD victims had a known medical history of epilepsy, seizures or other underlying neurological conditions and were therefore classified as SUDEP cases. RESULTS: In our SIDS and SUD cohorts, we found epilepsy-related pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the genes OPA1, RAI1, SCN3A, SCN5A and TSC2. CONCLUSION: Post-mortem analysis of epilepsy-related genes identified potentially disease-causing variants that might have contributed to the sudden death events in our SIDS/SUD cases. However, the interpretation of identified variants remains challenging and often changes over time as more data is gathered. Overall, this study contributes insight in potentially pathophysiological epilepsy-related mechanisms in SIDS, SUD and SUDEP victims and underlines the importance of sensible counselling on the risk and preventive measures in genetic epilepsy.

Clinical Perspective: EEG-Based Neuromodulation Technique for Epilepsy.

Epilepsy is the most common brain disorder around the world. The main treatments of epilepsy are through drug treatment or epilepsy surgery. However, examples of EEG-based neuromodulation treatments, such as Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neuro-stimulation (RNS), are also promising therapeutic methods nowadays. The aim of the paper is to recognize the effectiveness and potential risks of the three techniques. By carrying out randomized multicenter double-blind trials, this research studied the effectiveness of VNS, RNS, and DBS by measuring the median seizure reduction rate, rate of the responder, and proportion of seizure-free patients; the sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) of the treated patients; and the possible side effects that each treatment may cause. This review paper discusses the classification of epilepsy, common treatment methods for epilepsy, previous studies related to the three techniques, and data collected from the randomized multicenter double-blind trials. All in all, the result suggested that for short-term treatment, DBS may be the most effective method, but for long-term treatment, RNS may be more recommended. As the SUDEP rates for all three methods are lower than the SUDEP rate for epilepsy surgery, EEG-based neuromodulation techniques may become the main treatment for epilepsy in the future.