Clinicopathological implications to micropapillary bladder urothelial carcinoma of the presence of sialyl Lewis X-decorated mucin 1 in stroma-facing membranes.

OBJECTIVES: Bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) comprises more than 90% of all bladder cancers. Among several UC variants, micropapillary UC (MPUC) is a rare one with high potential for lymphovascular invasion and subsequent lymph node metastasis. Histologically, MPUC is characterized by the presence of small papillary carcinoma cell clusters surrounded by lacunar spaces. Immunohistochemically, the outer circumference of these clusters, that is, the stroma-facing membrane of carcinoma cells, is reportedly almost invariably positive for mucin 1 (MUC1) protein and to a lesser extent for sialyl Lewis X (sLeX) carbohydrates; however, the clinicopathological implications of these expression patterns have not been fully investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed immunohistochemical analysis of MPUC (n = 11) and conventional UC (n = 57) for MUC1 and sLeX to determine whether these factors immunolocalized. Dual immunofluorescence staining was also carried out to assess MUC1 and sLeX colocalization. We also performed Western blot analysis of Chinese hamster ovary cells misexpressing both recombinant epitope-tagged MUC1 and glycosyltransferases enabling sLeX biosynthesis. RESULTS: MPUC samples preferentially exhibited both MUC1 protein and sLeX carbohydrate expression on the stroma-facing membrane of carcinoma cells. Based on univariate analysis, MUC1 expression in that pattern was positively correlated with tumor extension, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, disease stage, and relatively poor patient prognosis. A comparable sLeX expression pattern also correlated positively with tumor extension and nodal metastasis. Based on multivariate analysis, localization of MUC1 and sLeX on the stroma-facing side of the membrane was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our immunofluorescence findings as well as immunoprecipitation analyses of Chinese hamster ovary cell transfectants strongly suggest that MUC1 is a potential scaffold protein for sLeX carbohydrates in MPUC. Both MUC1 and sLeX may cooperatively contribute to MPUC histogenesis and clinicopathological characteristics.

Pre-clinical toxicity and immunogenicity evaluation of a MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine.

Mucin 1 (MUC1), as an oncogene, plays a key role in the progression and tumorigenesis of many human adenocarcinomas and is an attractive target in tumor immunotherapy. Our previous study showed that the MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine induced a MUC1-specific Th1-dominant immune response, simulated MUC1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte killing activity, and could significantly inhibit MUC1-expression B16 cells' growth in mice. To help move the vaccine into a Phase I clinical trial, in the current study, a pre-clinical toxicity and immunogenicity evaluation of the vaccine was conducted. The evaluation was comprised of a single-dose acute toxicity study in mice, repeat-dose chronic toxicity and immunogenicity studies in rats, and pilot toxicity and immunogenicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys. The results showed that treatment with the MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine did not cause any organ toxicity, except for arthritis or local nodules induced by BCG in several rats. Furthermore, the vaccine significantly increased the levels of IFN-γ in rats, indicating that Th1 cells were activated. In addition, the results showed that the MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine induced a MUC1-specific IgG antibody response both in rats and cynomolgus monkeys. Collectively, these data are beneficial to move the MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine into a Phase I clinical trial.

Pitfalls of vaccinations with WT1-, Proteinase3- and MUC1-derived peptides in combination with MontanideISA51 and CpG7909.

T cells with specificity for antigens derived from Wilms Tumor gene (WT1), Proteinase3 (Pr3), and mucin1 (MUC1) have been demonstrated to lyse acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts and multiple-myeloma (MM) cells, and strategies to enhance or induce such tumor-specific T cells by vaccination are currently being explored in multiple clinical trials. To test safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine composed of WT1-, Pr3-, and MUC1-derived Class I-restricted peptides and the pan HLA-DR T helper cell epitope (PADRE) or MUC1-helper epitopes in combination with CpG7909 and MontanideISA51, four patients with AML and five with MM were repetitively vaccinated. No clinical responses were observed. Neither pre-existing nor naive WT1-/Pr3-/MUC1-specific CD8+ T cells expanded in vivo by vaccination. In contrast, a significant decline in vaccine-specific CD8+ T cells was observed. An increase in PADRE-specific CD4+ T helper cells was observed after vaccination but these appeared unable to produce IL2, and CD4+ T cells with a regulatory phenotype increased. Taken into considerations that multiple clinical trials with identical antigens but different adjuvants induced vaccine-specific T cell responses, our data caution that a vaccination with leukemia-associated antigens can be detrimental when combined with MontanideISA51 and CpG7909. Reflecting the time-consuming efforts of clinical trials and the fact that 1/3 of ongoing peptide vaccination trails use CpG and/or Montanide, our data need to be taken into consideration.

Phase I immunotherapy with a modified vaccinia virus (MVA) expressing human MUC1 as antigen-specific immunotherapy in patients with MUC1-positive advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: The MUC1 protein is a highly glycosylated mucin normally found at the apical surface of mucin-secreting epithelial cells in many types of tissues. MUC1 is expressed, but heavily underglycosylated, in different human tumors. TG4010 is a viral suspension of a recombinant vaccinia vector (MVA) containing DNA sequences coding for the human MUC1 antigen and interleukin-2 (IL-2). This product was developed for use as a vaccine in cancer patients whose tumors express the MUC1 antigen. The objective of the present study was to determine the safety of the product and to define the dose of TG4010 to be used in further clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with different solid tumors were treated by repeated intramuscular injection with increasing doses of TG4010 in two separate phase I studies, one in Europe (Basel-CR) and one in the United States (UCLA-RF): a total of 6 patients were treated at a dose of 5 x 10(6) pfu, 3 patients at 5 x 10(7) pfu, and 4 patients at 10(8) pfu. Safety, efficacy, and different immunological tests were the endpoints of the study. RESULTS: Tolerance of TG4010 was excellent, and side effects mainly consisted of injection site pain and influenza-like symptoms. There was no apparent detrimental effect of repeated injections of the vaccinia virus. Four of thirteen evaluable patients showed stabilization of their disease for 6 to 9 months. One lung cancer patient who was initially progressing after the first injections later showed a marked decrease in the size of his metastases that lasted for 14 months. Some T cell proliferative immune responses were seen in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of TG4010 was generally well tolerated in patients with metastatic tumors, and transient disease stabilization was observed in several patients, warranting further clinical studies with the product.

Vaccination of high-risk breast cancer patients with mucin-1 (MUC1) keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugate plus QS-21.

Our objective was to determine whether an immune response can be generated against MUC1 peptide and against tumor cell MUC1 after vaccination with MUC1-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) conjugate plus QS-21 in breast cancer patients. Nine patients with a history of breast cancer but without evidence of disease were treated with MUC1-KLH conjugate plus QS-21, containing 100 microg of MUC1 and 100 microg of QS-21. s.c. vaccinations were administered at weeks 1, 2, 3, 7, and 19. Peripheral blood was drawn at frequent intervals to assess antibody titers. Skin tests were placed at weeks 1, 3, 9, and 21 to determine delayed type hypersensitivity reactions. Common toxicities included a local skin reaction at the site of the vaccine, usually of 4-5 days' duration, and mild flu-like symptoms usually of 1-2 days' duration. High IgM and IgG antibody titers against synthetic MUC1 were detected. IgG antibody titers remain elevated from a minimum of 106-137 weeks after the first vaccination. Binding of IgM antibody to MCF-7 tumor cells was observed in seven patients, although there was minimal binding of IgG antibody. Two patients developed significant antibody titers post-high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell reinfusion. There was no evidence of T cell activation. This MUC1-KLH conjugate plus QS-21 was immunogenic and well tolerated in breast cancer patients. Additional trials are ongoing to determine the optimal MUC1 peptide for use in larger clinical trials. Further investigation of vaccine therapy in high-risk breast cancer is warranted.

A phase I trial of a synthetic mucin peptide vaccine. Induction of specific immune reactivity in patients with adenocarcinoma.

We tested a 105 amino acid synthetic mucin MUC-1 peptide that has 5 repeated immunodominant epitopes to evaluate toxicity and detect mucin-specific immune responses in patients with adenocarcinoma. We also studied the enhancement of these responses by vaccinating patients with the synthetic mucin peptide admixed with BCG. Mucins are glycoproteins present on the luminal surface of ductal epithelial cells and on tumors derived from them. The MUC-1 mucin is hypoglycosylated and nonpolarized on tumors and this exposes epitopes that can stimulate cytotoxic T-Cells (CTL). We vaccinated 63 patients with 100 micrograms of the 105aa mucin peptide mixed with BCG. Two additional vaccinations were given at 3-week intervals. All patients were able to tolerate vaccination, with most experiencing local ulceration at the vaccination site. All patients underwent hypersensitivity (DTH) testing with the 105aa and shorter mucin peptides, prior to vaccination. DTH responses were evaluated at 48 hr and the sites of highest peptide concentration were biopsied. Only 3 patients had a strong skin response to the long peptide. Examination of 55 biopsies showed intense T-Cell infiltration in 37 patients and lesser infiltration in 7. Seven of 22 patients tested had a 2- to 4-fold increase in mucin-specific CTLp. Serum levels of IL-6 were measured sequentially using the B9 hybridoma bioassay. Increasing serum levels of IL-6 correlated with constitutional symptoms (significance 0.001) and hypoalbuminemia (significance 0.007) but not with the extent of skin breakdown at vaccination sites. We conclude that mucin vaccination is safe and might serve to enhance specific responses to tumor antigens. IL-6 may be responsible for the constitution symptoms and hypoalbuminemia in these patients.