Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 394
Filtrar
1.
J Perinatol ; 44(5): 724-730, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of active surveillance and decolonization strategies on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection rates in a NICU. STUDY DESIGN: MRSA infection rates were compared before (2014-2016) and during (2017-2022) an active surveillance program. Eligible infants were decolonized with chlorohexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing and/or topical mupirocin. Successful decolonization and rates of recolonization were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-two (0.57%) of 9 100 hospitalized infants had invasive MRSA infections from 2014 to 2022; infection rates declined non-significantly. During the 6-year surveillance program, the risk of infection was 16.9-times [CI95 8.4, 34.1] higher in colonized infants than uncolonized infants. Those colonized with mupirocin-susceptible MRSA were more likely successfully decolonized (aOR 9.7 [CI95 4.2, 22.5]). Of 57 infants successfully decolonized who remained hospitalized, 34 (60%) became recolonized. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA infection rates did not significantly decline in association with an active surveillance and decolonization program. Alternatives to mupirocin and CHG are needed to facilitate decolonization.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Clorexidina , Infecção Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Mupirocina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Recém-Nascido , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/análogos & derivados , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Banhos
2.
JAMA ; 330(14): 1337-1347, 2023 10 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815567

RESUMO

Importance: Universal nasal mupirocin plus chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing in intensive care units (ICUs) prevents methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and all-cause bloodstream infections. Antibiotic resistance to mupirocin has raised questions about whether an antiseptic could be advantageous for ICU decolonization. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of iodophor vs mupirocin for universal ICU nasal decolonization in combination with CHG bathing. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two-group noninferiority, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial conducted in US community hospitals, all of which used mupirocin-CHG for universal decolonization in ICUs at baseline. Adult ICU patients in 137 randomized hospitals during baseline (May 1, 2015-April 30, 2017) and intervention (November 1, 2017-April 30, 2019) were included. Intervention: Universal decolonization involving switching to iodophor-CHG (intervention) or continuing mupirocin-CHG (baseline). Main Outcomes and Measures: ICU-attributable S aureus clinical cultures (primary outcome), MRSA clinical cultures, and all-cause bloodstream infections were evaluated using proportional hazard models to assess differences from baseline to intervention periods between the strategies. Results were also compared with a 2009-2011 trial of mupirocin-CHG vs no decolonization in the same hospital network. The prespecified noninferiority margin for the primary outcome was 10%. Results: Among the 801 668 admissions in 233 ICUs, the participants' mean (SD) age was 63.4 (17.2) years, 46.3% were female, and the mean (SD) ICU length of stay was 4.8 (4.7) days. Hazard ratios (HRs) for S aureus clinical isolates in the intervention vs baseline periods were 1.17 for iodophor-CHG (raw rate: 5.0 vs 4.3/1000 ICU-attributable days) and 0.99 for mupirocin-CHG (raw rate: 4.1 vs 4.0/1000 ICU-attributable days) (HR difference in differences significantly lower by 18.4% [95% CI, 10.7%-26.6%] for mupirocin-CHG, P < .001). For MRSA clinical cultures, HRs were 1.13 for iodophor-CHG (raw rate: 2.3 vs 2.1/1000 ICU-attributable days) and 0.99 for mupirocin-CHG (raw rate: 2.0 vs 2.0/1000 ICU-attributable days) (HR difference in differences significantly lower by 14.1% [95% CI, 3.7%-25.5%] for mupirocin-CHG, P = .007). For all-pathogen bloodstream infections, HRs were 1.00 (2.7 vs 2.7/1000) for iodophor-CHG and 1.01 (2.6 vs 2.6/1000) for mupirocin-CHG (nonsignificant HR difference in differences, -0.9% [95% CI, -9.0% to 8.0%]; P = .84). Compared with the 2009-2011 trial, the 30-day relative reduction in hazards in the mupirocin-CHG group relative to no decolonization (2009-2011 trial) were as follows: S aureus clinical cultures (current trial: 48.1% [95% CI, 35.6%-60.1%]; 2009-2011 trial: 58.8% [95% CI, 47.5%-70.7%]) and bloodstream infection rates (current trial: 70.4% [95% CI, 62.9%-77.8%]; 2009-2011 trial: 60.1% [95% CI, 49.1%-70.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Nasal iodophor antiseptic did not meet criteria to be considered noninferior to nasal mupirocin antibiotic for the outcome of S aureus clinical cultures in adult ICU patients in the context of daily CHG bathing. In addition, the results were consistent with nasal iodophor being inferior to nasal mupirocin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03140423.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Banhos , Clorexidina , Iodóforos , Mupirocina , Sepse , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração Intranasal , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Banhos/métodos , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Iodóforos/administração & dosagem , Iodóforos/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Pragmáticos como Assunto , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 44(11): 1707-1716, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34719647

RESUMO

Mupirocin nanoparticle-loaded hydrogel (MLH) was successfully developed. This study focused on the safety of cell lines and the biocompatibility of MLH for wound healing in rat models. MLH was assessed by an analysis of cytotoxicity and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines in cell lines. The cytocompatibility of MLH was compared with mupirocin ointment on full-thickness burn wounds in rats. The results indicated that MLH and blank hydrogel had no toxicity to human epidermal keratinocytes and human fibroblast cells. MLH inhibited lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activity in macrophage-like cells resulting in low nitric oxide production and reduced inflammatory cytokine production (interleukin (IL)-1ß) compared with a positive control (LPS only). In burn wounds, MLH and hydrogel healed the wound better than the other groups determined by wound contraction, reduced secretion, and the generation of new blood vessels, as well as promotion of hair follicle cells. Better granulation tissue proliferation, less necrosis, and a lower degree of inflammation were found in the MLH and blank hydrogel than in the mupirocin ointment. The hydrogel group reduced the macrophages (CD68) on day 14 at the edge of the wound. On day 28, T cells (CD3), B cells (CD20), and CD68+ cells were concentrated in the deeper subcutaneous tissue. Additionally, the transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1) concentration and matrix prometalloproteinase-2/tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 ratio in the MLH and hydrogel groups were less than those in the other groups. The MLH formulation was safe and effective in burn wound healing. Therefore, MLH formulations are promising candidates for further evaluation in clinical trials.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Queimaduras/tratamento farmacológico , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Linhagem Celular , Movimento Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Colágeno/metabolismo , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Hidrogéis , Masculino , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/efeitos adversos , Sistemas de Liberação de Fármacos por Nanopartículas , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos
5.
Dermatol Online J ; 27(7)2021 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391333

RESUMO

Periungual pyogenic granulomas are benign vascular tumors that present as painful, round, spontaneously bleeding lesions composed of rapidly proliferating capillaries and excess tissue. The vast majority of pyogenic granulomas are caused by physical trauma or infectious agents and they may resolve spontaneously. Herein, we highlight a very rare case of periungual pyogenic granulomas induced by the regularly prescribed oral retinoid acitretin during treatment for congenital palmoplantar keratoderma. This unique case showed that it is feasible to continue acitretin therapy in the presence of pyogenic granuloma development if proper dose reduction and topical therapies are utilized. The patient's lesions resolved within two weeks of this protocol's initiation and the pyogenic granulomas did not recur over the course of a six-month follow-up observation period. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed databases for the clinical features and treatments in other reported acitretin-induced pyogenic granuloma cases; we compiled a comprehensive list of other prescription drugs known to cause pyogenic granulomas up-to-date.


Assuntos
Acitretina/efeitos adversos , Granuloma Piogênico/induzido quimicamente , Ceratolíticos/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Unha/induzido quimicamente , Acitretina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Clobetasol/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Ceratodermia Palmar e Plantar/tratamento farmacológico , Ceratolíticos/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem
6.
Pharm Dev Technol ; 26(8): 852-866, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34193003

RESUMO

The goal of this study was to develop and examine the nanogel-based topical delivery system of mupirocin. Nanogels were prepared with chitosan and bovine serum albumin by ionic gelation and Carbopol 940 was added to improve the gelling/adhesive properties. Detailed characterization studies were performed and the cellular binding capacity of radiolabeled nanogels was investigated on CCD-1070Sk cell lines. Results indicate the successful formation of nanogels with particle size and zeta potential ranged between 341.920-603.320 nm and 13.120-24.300 mV, respectively. The mechanical and rheological studies proved pseudoplastic and strong elastic gel behavior (G' > G''). Mupirocin was successfully entrapped into nanogels with a ratio of more than 95% and the loaded drug was slowly released up to 93.89 ± 3.07% within 24 h. The ex vivo penetration and permeation percentages of mupirocin were very low (1.172 ± 0.202% and 0.161 ± 0.136%) indicating the suitability of nanogels for dermal use against superficial skin infections. The microbiological studies pointed out the effectiveness of nanogels against Staphylococcus aureus strains. Nanogels did not show toxicity signs and the cell binding capacity of radiolabeled formulations was found to be higher than [99mTc]NaTcO4 to CCD-1070Sk cell line. Overall, mupirocin nanogels might be considered as a potential and safe topical treatment option for bacterial skin infections.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Nanogéis , Resinas Acrílicas/administração & dosagem , Resinas Acrílicas/química , Administração Cutânea , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Quitosana/administração & dosagem , Quitosana/química , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Humanos , Mupirocina/farmacocinética , Nanogéis/administração & dosagem , Nanogéis/química , Permeabilidade , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Soroalbumina Bovina/administração & dosagem , Soroalbumina Bovina/química , Espectroscopia de Infravermelho com Transformada de Fourier , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos
7.
J Pediatr ; 236: 70-77, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023342

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of topical mupirocin in reducing Staphylococcus aureus colonization in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of mupirocin vs placebo in S aureus-colonized infants was conducted in a tertiary care NICU between October 2016 and December 2019. Weekly universal active surveillance with polymerase chain reaction screening identified colonized infants. Colonized infants received a 5-day course of mupirocin (mupirocin group) or petroleum jelly (control group). Repeat courses were given for additional positive screens. RESULTS: A total of 216 infants were enrolled; 205 were included in data analyses. Primary decolonization was more successful for mupirocin-treated infants (86 of 104 [83%]) than for controls (20 of 101; 20%) (P < .001). Although recurrent S aureus colonization occurred frequently (59 of 81 [73%] mupirocin-treated and 26 of 33 [79%] controls), subsequent decolonization remained more successful for mupirocin-treated infants than for controls (38 of 49 [78%] vs 2 of 21 [10%]; P < .001). Subgroup analyses of infants of ≤30 weeks' gestational age yielded similar results; decolonization occurred more often in mupirocin-treated infants compared with control infants (63 of 76 [83%] vs 13 of 74 [18%]; P < .001). Bacterial sterile site infections tended to be less frequent in mupirocin-treated infants compared with controls (2 of 104 [2%] vs 8 of 101 [8%]; P = .057). No invasive S aureus infections occurred in mupirocin-treated infants, but 50% of infections in controls were from S aureus, and 1 resulted in death. CONCLUSIONS: Universal active surveillance and targeted treatment with topical mupirocin is a successful decolonization strategy for NICU infants and may prevent S aureus infection. However, S aureus colonization frequently recurs, necessitating repeat treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02967432.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Carga Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Administração Tópica , Método Duplo-Cego , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Estudos Prospectivos , Retratamento , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo
8.
Assay Drug Dev Technol ; 19(4): 216-225, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33781090

RESUMO

In the present study, mupirocin (MP), an antimicrobial agent, was formulated as a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) by using a novel method named as melt emulsion ultrafiltration method. For the formulation of NLC, glyceryl monostearate and watermelon seed oil were used as solid and liquid lipids, respectively. The method was optimized for various parameters by Taguchi design of experiment and prepared NLCs were characterized for particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), shape, zeta potential, % drug loading, and in vitro release profile. The optimized NLCs were found to be smooth, monodisperse with PDI 0.229 ± 0.093. NLCs were found to have an average particle size of 139 ± 0.75 nm and +21.9 ± 0.98 mV as zeta potential. The % drug loading of optimized NLCs was found to be 59% ± 0.13%. The optimized NLCs were able to release the drug up to 24 h. The release kinetic study revealed mixed-order kinetics. Hence, it was concluded that the novel method is simple and able to fabricate MP-loaded NLCs with sustained release property and being stable in terms of particle size, PDI, and % drug loading.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/química , Citrullus/química , Portadores de Fármacos , Composição de Medicamentos , Liberação Controlada de Fármacos , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Glicerídeos/química , Cinética , Lipídeos/química , Mupirocina/química , Nanoestruturas , Tamanho da Partícula , Óleos de Plantas/química , Ultrafiltração
10.
J Orthop Res ; 39(2): 333-338, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33258495

RESUMO

Preoperative decolonization, especially of Staphylococcus aureus carriers, has been proposed to reduce periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), but the evidence-based consensus is still lacking and data on long-term outcomes is scarce. In a previous randomized, single-blinded trial, decolonization produced no significant reduction of surgical site infections in overall elective orthopedic surgery at 3-month follow-up. A 2-year follow-up was then performed to specifically detect the impact of decolonization on delayed-onset PJI (3-24 months after surgery). Between November 2015 and September 2017, 613 of 1318 recruited patients underwent prosthetic surgery. Individuals were allocated into either the S. aureus carrier group (34%, 207 of 613 patients) or the noncarrier group (406 of 613 patients), according to nasal swab screening results. Both groups were then randomized into intervention and control arms. In the S. aureus group, the intervention consisted of daily chlorhexidine showers and application of mupirocin nasal ointment twice a day for 5 days before surgery. In noncarriers, only chlorhexidine showers were prescribed. Sample size calculation was based on the initial trial for overall and not for the prosthetic surgery group. No PJI was found at 2 years in either the carrier or in the noncarrier group. Therefore, no definite conclusion about the efficacy of preoperative decolonization to reduce PJI can be drawn. PJI proportions in this study were lower than described in the literature (mostly around 0.3%). Despite the insufficient sample size, this trial is the largest randomized trial on decolonization with a long-term follow-up, and results may be helpful for future meta-analyses.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Administração Intranasal , Idoso , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
11.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 35(1): 107-133, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303331

RESUMO

Staphylococcus aureus infections are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, and health care costs. S aureus colonization has been shown to increase risk for invasive and noninvasive infections. Decolonization of S aureus has been evaluated in multiple patient settings as a possible strategy to decrease the risk of S aureus transmission and infection. In this article, we review the recent literature on S aureus decolonization in surgical patients, patients with recurrent skin and soft tissue infections, critically ill patients, hospitalized non-critically ill patients, dialysis patients, and nursing home residents to inform clinical practice.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Estado Terminal , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Diálise/métodos , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Casas de Saúde , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
12.
J Sci Med Sport ; 24(6): 520-525, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303369

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Skin and soft tissue infections commonly affect athletes and can lead to cluster outbreaks if not managed appropriately. We report the findings of an investigation into an outbreak of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection in an Australian professional football team. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Nose, axilla, groin and throat swab were collected from 47 participants. MRSA and MSSA isolates underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing, binary typing and whole genome sequencing. Infection control practitioners (ICPs) investigated the training grounds for risk factors in the transmission of S. aureus. RESULTS: Almost half of the participants (n=23, 48.9%) were found to be colonised with MSSA. An outbreak cluster of MRSA ST5 closely related to the fusidic acid-resistant New Zealand NZAK3 clone was identified in a group of four players. MSSA ST15 and MSSA ST291 strains were found to have colonised and spread between two and five players, respectively. All participants were advised to undergo decolonisation treatment consisting of 4% chlorhexidine body wash and mupirocin nasal ointment for ten days. The ICP team identified several unhygienic practices within the club's shared facilities that may have played a role in the transmission of S. aureus. CONCLUSIONS: We report for the first time a community-associated S. aureus outbreak involving the highly successful fusidic acid-resistant MRSA ST5 clone in a professional football club associated with inadequate hygiene procedures. Management and prevention of S. aureus relies heavily on hygiene education and adherence to personal and environmental hygiene practices and policies.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Futebol Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Intranasal , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Austrália/epidemiologia , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/transmissão , Estudos Transversais , Ácido Fusídico/farmacologia , Genoma Bacteriano , Humanos , Higiene , Meticilina/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Pomadas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
13.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 77(23): 1965-1972, 2020 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32959059

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be detected via nasal screens. Evidence indicates that negative MRSA nasal screens may be used to de-escalate anti-MRSA antibiotics in pulmonary infections. In the ICU, universal decolonization with intranasal mupirocin is implemented to reduce MRSA infection risk. This study aimed to determine whether mupirocin administration affects the reliability of MRSA PCR nasal screens. METHODS: This retrospective study divided subjects based on timing of intranasal mupirocin administration-before and after MRSA screen. Subjects with confirmed pulmonary infection that received vancomycin, blood/respiratory cultures, and had MRSA PCR screen collected were included. Subjects with concurrent infection requiring vancomycin or MRSA infection in prior 30 days were excluded. Primary outcome of this non-inferiority study was the negative predictive value (NPV) of the screen. Secondary outcomes included the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity of the screen and duration of vancomycin. RESULTS: Ultimately, 125 subjects were included in each group. The NPV in the group receiving mupirocin before screen was 95.2%, whereas the NPV in the group receiving mupirocin after screen was 99%. The difference between groups was -3.8% (90% CI -7.8%-0.2%; p=0.31), which failed to meet non-inferiority criteria. The secondary outcomes of PPV, sensitivity and specificity of the screen were similar in both groups. The duration of vancomycin was significantly longer in subjects receiving mupirocin before screen (3 days vs. 2 days; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intranasal mupirocin prior to the screen may reduce NPV in pulmonary infections. Approach de-escalation of vancomycin based on screen results with caution.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nariz/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
14.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 9: CD007239, 2020 09 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32987448

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the health benefits of breastfeeding, initiation and duration rates continue to fall short of international guidelines. Many factors influence a woman's decision to wean; the main reason cited for weaning is associated with lactation complications, such as mastitis. Mastitis is an inflammation of the breast, with or without infection. It can be viewed as a continuum of disease, from non-infective inflammation of the breast to infection that may lead to abscess formation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of preventive strategies (for example, breastfeeding education, pharmacological treatments and alternative therapies) on the occurrence or recurrence of non-infective or infective mastitis in breastfeeding women post-childbirth. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (3 October 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of interventions for preventing mastitis in postpartum breastfeeding women. Quasi-randomised controlled trials and trials reported only in abstract form were eligible. We attempted to contact the authors to obtain any unpublished results, wherever possible.  Interventions for preventing mastitis may include: probiotics, specialist breastfeeding advice and holistic approaches.   DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials (3034 women). Nine trials (2395 women) contributed data. Generally, the trials were at low risk of bias in most domains but some were high risk for blinding, attrition bias, and selective reporting. Selection bias (allocation concealment) was generally unclear. The certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of bias and to imprecision (low numbers of women participating in the trials). Conflicts of interest on the part of trial authors, and the involvement of industry funders may also have had an impact on the certainty of the evidence. Most trials reported our primary outcome of incidence of mastitis but there were almost no data relating to adverse effects, breast pain, duration of breastfeeding, nipple damage, breast abscess or recurrence of mastitis. Probiotics versus placebo Probiotics may reduce the risk of mastitis more than placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 0.75; 2 trials; 399 women; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain if probiotics reduce the risk of breast pain or nipple damage because the certainty of evidence is very low. Results for the biggest of these trials (639 women) are currently unavailable due to a contractual agreement between the probiotics supplier and the trialists. Adverse effects were reported in one trial, where no woman in either group experienced any adverse effects. Antibiotics versus placebo or usual care The risk of mastitis may be similar between antibiotics and usual care or placebo (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.34; 3 trials; 429 women; low-certainty evidence). The risk of mastitis may be similar between antibiotics and fusidic acid ointment (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.81; 1 trial; 36 women; low-certainty evidence) or mupirocin ointment (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.05 to 3.89; 1 trial; 44 women; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. None of the trials reported adverse effects. Topical treatments versus breastfeeding advice The risk of mastitis may be similar between fusidic acid ointment and breastfeeding advice (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.22; 1 trial; 40 women; low-certainty evidence) and mupirocin ointment and breastfeeding advice (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.35; 1 trial; 48 women; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. One trial (42 women) compared topical treatments to each other. The risk of mastitis may be similar between fusidic acid and mupirocin (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.00; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Specialist breastfeeding education versus usual care The risk of mastitis (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.17 to 4.95; 1 trial; 203 women; low-certainty evidence) and breast pain (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.37; 1 trial; 203 women; low-certainty evidence) may be similar but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Anti-secretory factor-inducing cereal versus standard cereal The risk of mastitis (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.72; 1 trial; 29 women; low-certainty evidence) and recurrence of mastitis (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.03 to 4.57; 1 trial; 7 women; low-certainty evidence) may be similar but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Acupoint massage versus routine care Acupoint massage probably reduces the risk of mastitis compared to routine care (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.78;1 trial; 400 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and breast pain (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.23; 1 trial; 400 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events were not reported. Breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment versus routine care Breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment may reduce risk of mastitis (RR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.21; 1 trial; 300 women; low-certainty evidence). Adverse events were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that acupoint massage is probably better than routine care, probiotics may be better than placebo, and breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment may be better than routine care for preventing mastitis. However, it is important to note that we are aware of at least one large trial investigating probiotics whose results have not been made public, therefore, the evidence presented here is incomplete. The available evidence regarding other interventions, including breastfeeding education, pharmacological treatments and alternative therapies, suggests these may be little better than routine care for preventing mastitis but our conclusions are uncertain due to the low certainty of the evidence. Future trials should recruit sufficiently large numbers of women in order to detect clinically important differences between interventions and results of future trials should be made publicly available.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Aleitamento Materno/efeitos adversos , Mastite/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Viés , Grão Comestível/química , Feminino , Ácido Fusídico/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Massagem/métodos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Neuropeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Pomadas/administração & dosagem , Placebos/uso terapêutico , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
15.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(2): 332-334, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805310

RESUMO

The objective was to describe French hospital nasal screening and decolonization procedures before clean surgery procedures. Information for participants was sent to the French Society for Infection Control members in June 2018. Seventy hospitals participated in the survey; 40% (N = 28) declared having institutional decolonization procedures: 64% (N = 18) in orthopaedic and 56% (N = 15) in cardiac surgeries. All hospitals used mupirocin for nasal decolonization and body decolonization with chlorhexidine (N = 16) or povidone iodine (N = 10). This study is the first to be performed in France giving information in this field. Screening/decolonization procedures are heterogeneous and the evaluation of their clinical impact remains complex.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Descontaminação/métodos , Nariz/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , França , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Povidona-Iodo/administração & dosagem , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Staphylococcus aureus , Inquéritos e Questionários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/efeitos adversos
16.
Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov ; 15(2): 137-156, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32814540

RESUMO

AIM: To design controlled release topical delivery of mupirocin for the treatment of skin infection. BACKGROUND: Mupirocin is an antibacterial drug. Mupirocin works to kill the bacteria, which include strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. It is also used for the treatment of inflammation of a hair follicle. The half-life of mupirocin is only 20-40 min. It has very slight solubility in water. Patent literature had shown work on ointment, antibiotic composition, nasal and topical composition. Emulgel is a duel control release system for the topical delivery of hydrophobic drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to formulate emulgel with controlled delivery of mupirocin using Sepineo P 600. METHODS: Soya oil, tween 80 and polyethylene glycol 400 (Oil:Surfactant:Cosurfactant) were used for emulsion formulation. Emulgel was optimized by 32 factorial design. Sepineo P 600 and hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose K4M were used as independent variables. Drug excipient compatibility analysis was carried out by FTIR, UV and DSC spectra. Emulgel was evaluated for its physical characterization, in vitro release, ex vivo release, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory study. RESULTS: DSC, UV and FTIR analysis confirmed drug excipient compatibility. FE SEM showed a size range between 228-255 nm. Zeta potential was found to be -25.1 mV, which showed good stability of the emulsion. Design expert software showed F2 as an optimized batch. Release studies indicated that the controlled release of drugs forms Sepineo P 600 gel due to its higher gelling capacity. Batch F2 showed comparable results with marketed formulation against Staphylococcus aureus. For batch F2, 40 µg/ml was the minimal inhibitory concentration. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory study proved successful development of stably controlled release mupirocin emulgel.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Excipientes/química , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Cutânea , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Embrião de Galinha , Galinhas , Preparações de Ação Retardada/administração & dosagem , Preparações de Ação Retardada/farmacocinética , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Liberação Controlada de Fármacos , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Emulsões , Géis , Cabras , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mupirocina/farmacocinética , Patentes como Assunto , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/microbiologia , Solubilidade , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
17.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 127: 110189, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32388242

RESUMO

Diabetic wounds are major issues in patients with diabetes. Medicinal plants of Teucrium polium and Aloe vera have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that may be profitable for diabetic patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of co-administration of ointments prepared from Teucrium polium hydroethanolic extract (TPEO) and Aloe vera gel (AVGO) on excisional wound healing in a diabetic mouse model. Following the induction of diabetes and circular excisional wound (7 mm), the mice were divided into six groups, namely (Ⅰ) control mice treated with mupirocin (as a standard drug), (Ⅱ and Ⅲ) the mice treated with 5 and 10 % TPEO, (Ⅳ and Ⅴ) the mice treated with 5 and 10 % AVGO, and (Ⅵ) the mice treated with a combination of 5% TPEO and 5% AVGO (TPEO+AVGO). To investigate the wound area, we further evaluated the wound area ratio, histological analysis and the serum levels of tissue antioxidant capacity (TAC) and malondialdehyde (MDA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), immunohistochemistry staining for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), glucose transporter-1(GLUT-1) and collagen type 1 and mRNA expression levels for VEGF, IGF-1, GLUT-1 and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). The results showed that administration of the ointments, especially in combination form, shortened the inflammatory phase and reduced the levels of tissue MDA, TNF-α and IL-1ß compared to mupirocin group (P < 0.05). Moreover, fibroblasts proliferation, collagen deposition, VEGF, IGF-1, GLUT-1-positive cells and level of TAC, and expressions of VEGF, IGF-1, GLUT-1 and FGF-2 were significantly (P < 0.05) increased in TPEO and AVGO, and especially in the mice treated with the mixed form. Therefore, topical co-administration of TPEO + AVGO accelerated open diabetic wound healing through shortening the inflammatory phase and increasing cell proliferation and collagen deposition.


Assuntos
Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Preparações de Plantas/administração & dosagem , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Tópica , Animais , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/farmacologia , Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Colágeno/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/farmacologia , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Preparações de Plantas/farmacologia , Teucrium
18.
Spine Deform ; 8(5): 931-938, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356280

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: Can a standardized, hospital-wide care bundle decrease surgical site infection (SSI) rate in pediatric spinal deformity surgery? SSI is a major concern in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our primary scoliosis surgeries between 1999 and 2017. In 2008, we implemented a standardized infection reduction bundle. Interventions included preoperative nares screening for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus 2 weeks preoperatively, and treatment with intranasal mupirocin when positive, a bath or shower the night before surgery, a preoperative chlorohexidine scrub, timing of standardized antibiotic administration, standardized intraoperative re-dosing of antibiotics, limiting operating room traffic, and standardized postoperative wound care. In 2011, we added intrawound vancomycin powder at wound closure. Our inclusion criteria were patients 21 years of age or less with idiopathic, neuromuscular, syndromic, or congenital scoliosis who had a primary spinal fusion or a same day anterior and posterior spine fusion with segmental spinal instrumentation of six levels or more. We compared the incidence of early (within 90 days of surgery) and late (> 91 days) SSI during the first postoperative year. RESULTS: There were 804 patients who met inclusion criteria: 404 in the non-bundle group (NBG) for cases prior to protocol change and 400 in the bundle group (BG) for cases after the protocol change. Postoperatively, there were 29 infections (7.2% of total cases) in the NBG: 9 early (2.2%) and 20 late (5.0%) while in the BG there were only 10 infection (2.5%): 6 early (1.5%) and 4 late (1.0%). The reduction in overall SSIs was statistically significant (p = 0.01). There was a trend toward decreased early infections in the BG, without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Standardized care bundles appear effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative pediatric spine SSIs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Administração Intranasal , Adolescente , Banhos , Criança , Clorexidina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Pós , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
19.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 99(1_suppl): 30S-34S, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32182136

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Only a few medications have a United States Food and Drug Administration indications for prevention and/or treatment of infections in patients with tympanic perforations or tympanostomy tubes. We examined 3 off-label agents that have become important in tympanostomy tube care hoping to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of each in experimental assays and human application. METHODS: Computerized literature review. RESULTS: (1) Oxymetazoline nasal spray applied at the time of surgery is equivalent to fluoroquinolone ear drops in the prevention of early postsurgical otorrhea and tympanostomy tube occlusion at the first postoperative visit. (2) Topical mupirocin 2% ointment is effective alone or in combination with culture-directed systemic therapy for the treatment of tympanostomy tube otorrhea caused by community-acquired, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. (3) Topical clotrimazole 1% cream is highly active against the common yeast and fungi that cause otomycosis. A single application after microscopic debridement will cure fungal tympanostomy tube otorrhea in most cases. None of these 3 agents is ototoxic in animal histological or physiological studies, and each has proved safe in long-term clinical use. CONCLUSIONS: Oxymetazoline nasal spray, mupirocin ointment, and clotrimazole cream are safe and effective as off-label medications for tympanostomy tube care in children.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Ventilação da Orelha Média/efeitos adversos , Otite Média com Derrame/cirurgia , Otite/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Administração Tópica , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Clotrimazol/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Sprays Nasais , Uso Off-Label , Otite/microbiologia , Otite Média com Derrame/microbiologia , Oximetazolina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle
20.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 18(2): 153-156, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266440

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Infection is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplant. Based on the well-documented successes of reducing infections with decolonization of patients in intensive care units, we began a universal immediate posttransplant decolonization program for all kidney transplant recipients. Herein, we report safety and efficacy of this decolonization program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared a consecutive cohort of kidney transplant recipients who underwent universal decolonization (intervention group) with a cohort of transplant patients from an era immediately prior to this practice (control group). Universal decolonization included daily chlorhexidine body wash and nasal mupirocin ointment. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients who underwent universal decolonization were compared with 43 patients in the control group. Ten microbiologically proven infections (8.3%) occurred in the 30 days after discharge: 7 (9%) in the intervention group and 3 (7%) in the control group. Forty-five transplant recipients (37.2%) were readmitted in the 30 days after discharge: 31 (39.7%) in the intervention group and 14 (32.6%) in the control group. No patients in the intervention group had adverse drug events from mupirocin and chlorhexidine use. CONCLUSIONS: A universal decolonization protocol was successfully implemented and was well tolerated by all patients. Despite successful implementation, we did not observe any significant differences in infection rates between treated patients and historical controls.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Controle de Infecções , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Administração Intranasal , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Clorexidina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mupirocina/efeitos adversos , Pomadas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...