The pharmacokinetic interaction between nasally administered naloxone and the opioid remifentanil in human volunteers.

PURPOSE: Remifentanil has been shown to increase the bioavailability of nasally administered naloxone. The aim of this study was to explore the nature of this observation. METHODS: We analysed samples from three pharmacokinetic studies to determine the serum concentrations of naloxone-3-glucuronide (N3G), the main metabolite of naloxone, with or without exposure to remifentanil. To enable direct comparison of the three studies, the data are presented as metabolic ratios (ratio of metabolite to mother substance, N3G/naloxone) and dose-corrected values of the area under the curve and maximum concentration (Cmax). RESULTS: Under remifentanil exposure, the time to maximum concentration (Tmax) for N3G was significantly higher for intranasal administration of 71 min compared to intramuscular administration of 40 min. The dose-corrected Cmax of N3G after intranasal administration of naloxone under remifentanil exposure was significantly lower (4.5 ng/mL) than in subjects not exposed to remifentanil (7.8-8.4 ng/mL). The metabolic ratios after intranasal administration rose quickly after 30-90 min and were 2-3 times higher at 360 min compared to intravenous and intramuscular administration. Remifentanil exposure resulted in a much slower increase of the N3G/naloxone ratio after intranasal administration compared to intranasal administration with the absence of remifentanil. After remifentanil infusion was discontinued, this effect gradually diminished. From 240 min there was no significant difference between the ratios observed after intranasal naloxone administration. CONCLUSION: Remifentanil increases the bioavailability of naloxone after nasal administration by reducing the pre-systemic metabolism of the swallowed part of the nasal dose.

The Effects of Intramuscular Naloxone Dose on Mu Receptor Displacement of Carfentanil in Rhesus Monkeys.

Naloxone (NLX) is a mu receptor antagonist used to treat acute opioid overdoses. Currently approved doses of naloxone to treat opioid overdoses are 4 mg intranasal (IN) and 2 mg intramuscular (IM). However, higher mu receptor occupancy (RO) may be required to treat overdoses due to more potent synthetic opioids such as fentanyl and carfentanil that have entered the illicit drug market recently. To address this need, a higher dose of NLX has been investigated in a 5 mg IM formulation called ZIMHI but, while the effects of intravenous (IV) and IN administration of NLX on the opioid mu receptor occupancy (RO) have been studied, comparatively little is known about RO for IM administration of NLX. The goal of this study was to examine the effect of IM dosing of NLX on mu RO in rhesus macaques using [11C]carfentanil positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The lowest dose of NLX (0.06 mg/kg) approximated 51% RO. Higher doses of NLX (0.14 mg/kg, 0.28 mg/kg) resulted in higher mu RO of 70% and 75%, respectively. Plasma levels were 4.6 ng/mL, 16.8 ng/mL, and 43.4 ng/mL for the three IM doses, and a significant correlation between percent RO and plasma NLX level was observed (r = 0.80). These results suggest that higher doses of IM NLX result in higher mu RO and could be useful in combating overdoses resulting from potent synthetic opioids.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intranasal and intravenous naloxone hydrochloride administration in healthy dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of naloxone hydrochloride in dogs following intranasal (IN) and IV administration. ANIMALS: 6 healthy adult mixed-breed dogs. PROCEDURES: In a blinded crossover design involving 2 experimental periods separated by a washout period (minimum of 7 days), dogs were randomly assigned to receive naloxone IN (4 mg via a commercially available fixed-dose naloxone atomizer; mean ± SD dose, 0.17 ± 0.02 mg/kg) or IV (0.04 mg/kg) in the first period and then the opposite treatment in the second period. Plasma naloxone concentrations, dog behavior, heart rate, and respiratory rate were evaluated for 24 hours/period. RESULTS: Naloxone administered IN was well absorbed after a short lag time (mean ± SD, 2.3 ± 1.4 minutes). Mean maximum plasma concentration following IN and IV administration was 9.3 ± 2.5 ng/mL and 18.8 ± 3.9 ng/mL, respectively. Mean time to maximum concentration following IN administration was 22.5 ± 8.2 minutes. Mean terminal half-life after IN and IV administration was 47.4 ± 6.7 minutes and 37.0 ± 6.7 minutes, respectively. Mean bioavailability of naloxone administered IN was 32 ± 13%. There were no notable changes in dog behavior, heart rate, or respiratory rate following naloxone administration by either route. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Use of a naloxone atomizer for IN naloxone administration in dogs may represent an effective alternative to IV administration in emergency situations involving opioid exposure. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of IN naloxone administration in dogs with opioid intoxication, including a determination of effective doses.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Naloxone and Naltrexone Following Intranasal Administration to Healthy Subjects.

Naloxone (17-allyl-4,5α-epoxy-3,14-dihydroxymorphinan-6-one HCl), a µ-opioid receptor antagonist, is administered intranasally to reverse an opioid overdose but its short half-life may necessitate subsequent doses. The addition of naltrexone [17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4,5α-epoxy-3,14-dihydroxymorphinan-6-one], another µ-receptor antagonist, which has a reported half-life of 3 1/2 hours, may extend the available time to receive medical treatment. In a phase 1 pharmacokinetic study, healthy adults were administered naloxone and naltrexone intranasally, separately and in combination. When administered with naloxone, the C max value of naltrexone decreased 62% and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) decreased 38% compared with when it was given separately; lower concentrations of naltrexone were observed as early as 5 minutes postdose. In contrast, the C max and AUC0-inf values of naloxone decreased only 18% and 16%, respectively, when given with naltrexone. This apparent interaction was investigated further to determine if naloxone and naltrexone shared a transporter. Neither compound was a substrate for organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2, OCT3, OCTN1, or OCTN2. There was no evidence of the involvement of a transmembrane transporter when they were tested separately or in combination at concentrations of 10 and 500 µM using Madin-Darby canine kidney II cell monolayers at pH 7.4. The efflux ratios of naloxone and naltrexone increased to six or greater when the apical solution was pH 5.5, the approximate pH of the nasal cavity; there was no apparent interaction when the two were coincubated. The importance of understanding how opioid antagonists are absorbed by the nasal epithelium is magnified by the rise in overdose deaths attributed to long-lived synthetic opioids and the realization that better strategies are needed to treat opioid overdoses.

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic Properties of Naloxone Following the Use of FDA-Approved Intranasal and Intramuscular Devices Versus a Common Improvised Nasal Naloxone Device.

For more than a decade, first responders and the general public have been able to treat suspected opioid overdoses using an improvised nasal naloxone device (INND) constructed from a prefilled syringe containing 2 mg of naloxone (1 mg/mL) attached to a mucosal atomization device. In recent years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved Ezvio, an autoinjector that delivers 2 mg by intramuscular injection and Narcan nasal spray (2- and 4-mg strengths; 0.1 mL/dose) for the emergency treatment of a known or suspected opioid overdose. The present study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of naloxone using the FDA-approved devices (each administered once) and either 1 or 2 administrations using the INND. When naloxone was administered twice using the improvised device, the doses were separated by 2 minutes. The highest maximum plasma concentration was achieved using the 4-mg FDA-approved spray. The highest exposures at 5 minutes postdose, based on AUC values, were after administration with the autoinjector and the 4-mg FDA-approved spray; at 10, 15, and 20 minutes postdose, the latter yielded the greatest exposure. Even after 2 administrations, the INND failed to achieve naloxone plasma levels comparable to the FDA-approved devices at any time. The ease of use and higher plasma concentrations achieved using the 4-mg FDA-approved spray, compared with the INND, should be considered when deciding which naloxone device to use.

Addressing the Fentanyl Analogue Epidemic by Multiplex UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Whole Blood.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl and fentanyl analogues (fentanyls) are very potent opioids posing a serious threat to the public health. Thousands of overdose deaths across the world are caused by fentanyls, and the numbers are increasing. Rapid mapping of current trends in opioid abuse is necessary to accelerate preventive measures. To ensure this, there is a need for sensitive targeted multiplex MS/MS methods to pinpoint drugs of abuse. We present a fully validated UHPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of 26 fentanyls, including several structural isomers, and the opioid antagonist naloxone in human whole blood. METHODS: Blood samples were prepared by liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate and heptane. The fentanyls were separated with UHPLC, using a Kinetex biphenyl column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 µm; Phenomenex, Verløse, Denmark) with an acidic mobile phase. Quantification was performed by MS/MS. The method was validated according to SWGTOX guidelines. RESULTS: The developed method could successfully separate all 27 analytes, including 7 isomers, and was validated according to SWGTOX guidelines with very low limits of quantification (4-20 pg/mL). The applicability of the method was demonstrated by determination of fentanyls in postmortem blood samples from 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: A selective, highly sensitive, and robust method for determination of a large panel of fentanyls and naloxone in blood was developed and validated. Naloxone was included to monitor use and efficacy of the opioid antidote in cases of fentanyl overdoses. The method demonstrated good ability to separate structural isomers, which is important to differentiate between the numerous available fentanyls with variable potency, toxicity, and legal status. The developed method can be used to identify fentanyls on the drug market to help combat the fentanyl crisis.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmaceutical properties of a novel buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablet for opioid substitution therapy versus conventional buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablet in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: A novel sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly-dissolving tablet (BNX-RDT) for opioid substitution therapy has been developed for improved bioavailability, rapid disintegration and improved taste masking. We compared the bioavailability and pharmaceutical properties of BNX-RDT with conventional buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablets (BNX). METHODS: Fasting, open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-cohort crossover study in healthy volunteers under naltrexone block. Cohort 1 (high-dose, N = 64) received BNX-RDT 11.4/2.9 mg and BNX 16/4 mg. Cohort 2 (low-dose, N = 61) received BNX-RDT 2.9/0.71 mg and BNX 4/1 mg. Plasma samples were collected over 72 h. Relative systemic exposures of buprenorphine and naloxone were assessed using standard statistical models for bioequivalence analysis. Pharmaceutical assessments included dissolve time, taste and mouthfeel assessments, and overall preference. RESULTS: BNX-RDT 11.4/2.9 mg provided equivalent buprenorphine and naloxone exposure to BNX 16/4 mg. BNX-RDT 2.9/0.71 mg provided ~20% lower buprenorphine and 35% lower naloxone exposure compared with BNX 4/1 mg. The comparison of BNX-RDT 2.9/0.71 mg with BNX 4/1 mg did not fully meet equivalence criteria. BNX-RDT was associated with improved dose proportionality across strengths compared with BNX (post hoc analysis), resulting in lower exposure from BNX-RDT relative to BNX at the lower strength. Median perceived dissolve times were significantly shorter for BNX-RDT than BNX at high (8.5 versus 16.2 min) and low (7.6 versus 9.1 min) doses. Taste and mouthfeel were rated significantly more pleasant than BNX, with ~78% of subjects preferring BNX-RDT. CONCLUSION: BNX-RDT provided improved buprenorphine absorption compared to a conventional sublingual tablet, with shorter dissolve times and improved taste and mouthfeel, resulting in a high preference for the novel formulation.

Pharmacokinetic properties of intranasal and injectable formulations of naloxone for community use: a systematic review.

AIM: To assess the pharmacokinetic properties of community-use formulations of naloxone for emergency treatment of opioid overdose. METHODS: Systematic literature review based on searches of established databases and congress archives. RESULTS: Seven studies met inclusion criteria: two of US FDA-approved intramuscular (im.)/subcutaneous (sc.) auto-injectors, one of an FDA-approved intranasal spray, two of unapproved intranasal kits (syringe with atomizer attachment) and two of intranasal products in development. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of im./sc. auto-injector 2 mg and approved intranasal spray (2 and 4 mg) demonstrated rapid uptake and naloxone exposure exceeding that of the historic benchmark (0.4 mg im.), indicating that naloxone exposure was adequate for reversal of opioid overdose.

Pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of intramuscular and intranasal naloxone: an explorative study in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a model for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies of naloxone antagonism under steady-state opioid agonism and to compare a high-concentration/low-volume intranasal naloxone formulation 8 mg/ml to intramuscular 0.8 mg. METHODS: Two-way crossover in 12 healthy volunteers receiving naloxone while receiving remifentanil by a target-controlled infusion for 102 min. The group were subdivided into three different doses of remifentanil. Blood samples for serum naloxone concentrations, pupillometry and heat pain threshold were measured. RESULTS: The relative bioavailability of intranasal to intramuscular naloxone was 0.75. Pupillometry showed difference in antagonism; the effect was significant in the data set as a whole (p < 0.001) and in all three subgroups (p < 0.02-p < 0.001). Heat pain threshold showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: A target-controlled infusion of remifentanil provides good conditions for studying the pharmacodynamics of naloxone, and pupillometry was a better modality than heat pain threshold. Intranasal naloxone 0.8 mg is inferior for a similar dose intramuscular. Our design may help to bridge the gap between studies in healthy volunteers and the patient population in need of naloxone for opioid overdose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02307721.

Pharmacokinetics of concentrated naloxone nasal spray for opioid overdose reversal: Phase I healthy volunteer study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Take-home naloxone can prevent death from heroin/opioid overdose, but pre-provision is difficult because naloxone is usually given by injection. Non-injectable alternatives, including naloxone nasal sprays, are currently being developed. To be effective, the intranasal (i.n.) spray dose must be adequate but not excessive, and early absorption must be comparable to intramuscular (i.m.) injection. We report on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a specially produced concentrated novel nasal spray. The specific aims were to: (1) estimate PK profiles of i.n. naloxone, (2) compare early systemic exposure with i.n. versus i.m. naloxone and (3) estimate i.n. bioavailability. DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, five-way cross-over PK study. SETTING: Clinical trials facility (Croydon, UK). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (age 20-54 years; 11 female). INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Three doses of i.n. (1 mg/0.1 ml, 2 mg/0.1 ml, 4 mg/0.2 ml) versus 0.4 mg i.m. (reference) and 0.4 mg intravenous (i.v.) naloxone. MEASUREMENTS: Regular blood samples were taken, with high-frequency sampling during the first 15 minutes to capture early systemic exposure. PK parameters were determined from plasma naloxone concentrations. Exploratory analyses involved simulation of repeat administration. FINDINGS: Mean peak concentration (Cmax ) values for 1 mg (1.51 ng/ml), 2 mg (2.87 ng/ml) and 4 mg (6.02 ng/ml) i.n. exceeded 0.4 mg i.m. (1.27 ng/ml) naloxone. All three i.n. doses rapidly achieved plasma levels > 50% of peak concentrations (T50%) by 10 minutes, peaking at 15-30 minutes (Tmax ). For comparison, the i.m. reference reached Tmax at 10 minutes. Mean bioavailability was 47-51% for i.n. relative to i.m. naloxone. Simulation of repeat dosing (2 × 2 mg i.n. versus 5 × 0.4 mg i.m. doses) at 3-minute intervals showed that comparable plasma naloxone concentrations would be anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrated 2 mg intranasal naloxone is well-absorbed and provides early exposure comparable to 0.4 mg intramuscular naloxone, following the 0.4 mg intramuscular curve closely in the first 10 minutes post-dosing and maintaining blood levels above twice the intramuscular reference for the next 2 hours.

No Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions between Methadone or Buprenorphine-Naloxone and Antiviral Combination Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir.

The combination of glecaprevir (formerly ABT-493), a nonstructural protein 3/4A (NS3/4A) protease inhibitor, and pibrentasvir (formerly ABT-530), an NS5A protein inhibitor, is being developed as treatment for HCV genotype 1 to 6 infection. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone when coadministered with the glecaprevir-pibrentasvir combination in HCV-negative subjects on stable opioid maintenance therapy were investigated in a phase 1, single-center, two-arm, multiple-dose, open-label sequential study. Subjects received methadone (arm 1) or buprenorphine-naloxone (arm 2) once daily (QD) per their existing individual prescriptions alone (days 1 to 9) and then in combination with glecaprevir at 300 mg QD and pibrentasvir at 120 mg QD (days 10 to 16) each morning. Dose-normalized exposures were similar with and without glecaprevir and pibrentasvir for (R)- and (S)-methadone (≤5% difference) and for buprenorphine and naloxone (≤24% difference); the norbuprenorphine area under the curve was 30% higher with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, consistent with maximum and trough plasma concentrations that increased by 21% to 25%. No changes in pupil response, short opiate withdrawal scale score, or desire for drugs questionnaire were observed when glecaprevir and pibrentasvir were added to methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone therapy. No dose adjustment is required when glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are coadministered with methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone.

Pharmacokinetics of a new, nasal formulation of naloxone.

PURPOSE: Nasal naloxone is wanted for bystander administration in opioid overdose and as a needle-free alternative for emergency medical personnel. Epidemiologic studies have indicated a therapeutic effect of bystander administration of low-concentration/high-volume formulations. The objective for this study was to describe the nasal pharmacokinetics of a new high-concentration/low-volume nasal formulation of naloxone. METHODS: This was an open, randomized triple crossover trial in healthy, human volunteers (n = 12) where two doses of nasal naloxone (0.8 and 1.6 mg) and one intravenous dose (1.0 mg) were compared. Fifteen serum samples were collected before and until 6 h after naloxone administration. Quantification of naloxone was performed by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: Bioavailability was 0.54 (0.45-0.63) for the 0.8 mg and 0.52 (0.37-0.67) for the 1.6 mg nasal naloxone formulation. Maximum concentration levels (C max) were 1.45 ng/ml (1.07-1.84) for 0.8 mg and 2.57 ng/ml (1.49-3.66) for the 1.6 mg. Time to maximum concentrations (T max) were reached at 17.9 min (11.4-24.5) and 18.6 min (14.4-22.9) for the 0.8 mg and the 1.6 mg doses, respectively. CONCLUSION: This nasal naloxone formulation had a rapid, systemic uptake and higher bioavailability than naloxone formulations not designed for IN use. This indicates that an optimized high-concentration/low-volume nasal spray formulation may deliver a therapeutic dose. The 1.6 mg nasal dose provided serum concentrations that surpassed those of 1.0 mg IV after 15-20 min and stayed above for the rest of the study period.

Quantitative determination of buprenorphine, naloxone and their metabolites in rat plasma using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

A rapid and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of buprenorphine and its three metabolites (buprenorphine glucuronide, norbuprenorphine and norbuprenorphine glucuronide) as well as naloxone and its metabolite naloxone glucuronide in the rat plasma. A hydrophilic interaction chromatography column and a mobile phase containing acetonitrile and ammonium formate buffer (pH 3.5) were used for the chromatographic separation. Mass spectrometric detection was achieved by an electrospray ionization source in the positive mode coupled to a triple quadrupole mass analyzer. The calibration curves for the six analytes displayed good linearity over the concentration range 1.0 or 5.0-1000 ng/mL. The intra and inter-day precision (CV) ranged from 2.68 to 16.4% and from 9.02 to 14.5%, respectively. The intra- and inter-day accuracy (bias) ranged from -14.2 to 15.2% and from -9.00 to 4.80%, respectively. The extraction recoveries for all the analytes ranged from 55 to 86.9%. The LC-MS/MS method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of buprenorphine-naloxone combination in rats.

Improving the oral bioavailability of buprenorphine: an in-vivo proof of concept.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to improve the oral bioavailability of buprenorphine by inhibiting presystemic metabolism via the oral co-administration of 'Generally Recognized as Safe' compounds, thus providing an orally administered drug product with less variability and comparable or higher exposure compared with the sublingual route. METHODS: The present studies were performed in Sprague Dawley rats following either intravenous or oral administration of buprenorphine/naloxone and oral co-administration of 'Generally Recognized as Safe' compounds referred to as 'adjuvants'. Plasma samples were collected up to 22 h postdosing followed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. KEY FINDINGS: The adjuvants increased Cmax (21 ± 16 ng/ml vs 75 ± 33 ng/ml; 3.6-fold) and AUC(0-22 h) (10.6 ± 8.11 µg min/ml vs 22.9 ± 11.7 µg min/ml; 2.2-fold) values of buprenorphine (control vs adjuvant-treated, respectively). The absolute oral bioavailability of buprenorphine doubled (from 1.24% to 2.68%) in the presence of the adjuvants. CONCLUSIONS: One may suggest that the adjuvant treatment most likely inhibited the presystemic metabolic enzymes, thus decreasing the intestinal 'first-pass effect' on buprenorphine. Additional studies are now required to further explore the concept of inhibiting presystemic metabolism of buprenorphine by adjuvants to potentially increase the oral bioavailability of buprenorphine.

Abuse Potential Study of ALO-02 (Extended-Release Oxycodone Surrounding Sequestered Naltrexone) Compared with Immediate-Release Oxycodone Administered Orally to Nondependent Recreational Opioid Users.

Objective: To evaluate the abuse potential of ALO-02, an abuse-deterrent formulation comprising pellets of extended-release oxycodone hydrochloride surrounding sequestered naltrexone hydrochloride. Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-/active-controlled, 6-way crossover study, with naloxone challenge, drug discrimination, and treatment phases. Subjects: Nondependent, recreational opioid users. Methods: Oral administration of crushed and intact ALO-02, crushed immediate-release (IR) oxycodone, and placebo. Primary endpoints were Drug Liking and High measured on visual analog scales and reported as maximum effect (E max ) and area-under-the-effect-curve from 0 to 2 hours (AUE 0-2h ). Other pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were included. Results: Drug Liking and High (E max ) for crushed oxycodone IR 40 mg were significantly higher compared with placebo, confirming study validity ( P < 0.0001). Drug Liking and High (E max, AUE 0-2h ) for crushed ALO-02 (40 mg/4.8 mg and 60 mg/7.2 mg) were significantly lower compared to corresponding doses of crushed oxycodone IR (40 and 60 mg; P < 0.0001). Likewise, Drug Liking and High (E max and AUE 0-2h ) for intact ALO-02 60 mg/7.2 mg were significantly lower compared with crushed oxycodone IR 60 mg ( P < 0.0001). Secondary pharmacodynamic endpoints and plasma concentrations of oxycodone and naltrexone were consistent with these results. Fewer participants experienced adverse events (AEs) after ALO-02 (crushed or intact: 71.1-91.9%) compared with crushed oxycodone IR (100%). Most common AEs following crushed ALO-02 and oxycodone IR were euphoric mood, pruritus, somnolence, and dizziness. Conclusions: The results suggest that ALO-02 (crushed or intact) has lower abuse potential than crushed oxycodone IR when administered orally in nondependent, recreational opioid users.

Comparison of (+)- and (-)-Naloxone on the Acute Psychomotor-Stimulating Effects of Heroin, 6-Acetylmorphine, and Morphine in Mice.

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling is implied in opioid reinforcement, reward, and withdrawal. Here, we explored whether TLR4 signaling is involved in the acute psychomotor-stimulating effects of heroin, 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), and morphine as well as whether there are differences between the three opioids regarding TLR4 signaling. To address this, we examined how pretreatment with (+)-naloxone, a TLR4 active but opioid receptor (OR) inactive antagonist, affected the acute increase in locomotor activity induced by heroin, 6-AM, or morphine in mice. We also assessed the effect of pretreatment with (-)-naloxone, a TLR4 and OR active antagonist, as well as the pharmacokinetic profiles of (+) and (-)-naloxone in the blood and brain. We found that (-)-naloxone reduced acute opioid-induced locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner. By contrast, (+)-naloxone, administered in doses assumed to antagonize TLR4 but not ORs, did not affect acute locomotor activity induced by heroin, 6-AM, or morphine. Both naloxone isomers exhibited similar concentration versus time profiles in the blood and brain, but the brain concentrations of (-)-naloxone reached higher levels than those of (+)-naloxone. However, the discrepancies in their pharmacokinetic properties did not explain the marked difference between the two isomers' ability to affect opioid-induced locomotor activity. Our results underpin the importance of OR activation and do not indicate an apparent role of TLR4 signaling in acute opioid-induced psychomotor stimulation in mice. Furthermore, there were no marked differences between heroin, 6-AM, and morphine regarding involvement of OR or TLR4 signaling.

Simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine, naloxone and phase I and II metabolites in plasma and breastmilk by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Opioid abuse during pregnancy is associated with fetal growth restriction, placental abruption, preterm labor, fetal death, and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Current guidelines for medication-assisted opioid addiction treatment during pregnancy are methadone or buprenorphine monotherapy. Buprenorphine/naloxone combination therapy (Suboxone(®)) has not been thoroughly evaluated during pregnancy and insufficient naloxone safety data exist. While methadone- and buprenorphine-treated mothers are encouraged to breastfeed, no studies to date investigated naloxone concentrations during breastfeeding following Suboxone administration. For this reason, we developed and fully validated a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine, buprenorphine-glucuronide, norbuprenorphine, norbuprenorphine-glucuronide, naloxone, naloxone-glucuronide and naloxone-N-oxide in 100µL human plasma and breastmilk in a single injection following protein precipitation and solid-phase extraction. Lowest limits of quantification were 0.1-2µg/L with 20-100µg/L upper limits of linearity. Bias and imprecision were <±16%. Matrix effects ranged from -57.9 to 11.2 and -84.6 to 29.3% in plasma and breastmilk, respectively. All analytes were stable (within ±20% change from baseline) under all tested conditions (24h room temperature, 72h at 4°C, 3 freeze/thaw cycles at -20°C, and in the autosampler for 72h at 4°C). For proof of concept, buprenorphine and its metabolites were successfully quantified in authentic positive maternal and infant plasma and paired breastmilk specimens. This comprehensive, highly sensitive and specific method detects multiple buprenorphine markers in a small specimen volume.

Simultaneous determination of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and naloxone in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

A simple, sensitive and rapid liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for simultaneous quantification of naloxone, buprenorphine and its metabolite norbuprenorphine in human plasma. Human plasma samples were extracted using a single step liquid-liquid extraction, and then separated on an Imtakt Unison UK-C18 column (2.1×50mm, 3µm) using alkaline mobile phases with gradient elution. All of the analytes were detected in positive ion mode using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The method was validated and the specificity, linearity, lower limit of quantitation, precision, accuracy, recoveries and stability were determined. The linear range was 20-10000pg/mL for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine; and 1-500pg/mL for naloxone. The correlation coefficient (R(2)) values for all three analytes were ≥0.995. The precision and accuracy for intra-day and inter-day were <11.0%. The recoveries were >63% and matrix effects were tracked by the deuterated internal standards (IS) with the IS-normalized matrix factor ranging from 0.96 to 1.33 for all three analytes. The validated method was successfully applied in a clinical pharmacokinetic study with low dose administration of sublingual buprenorphine and naloxone.

Effect of a high-dose target-controlled naloxone infusion on pain and hyperalgesia in patients following groin hernia repair: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Central sensitization is modulated by the endogenous opioid system and plays a major role in the development and maintenance of pain. Recent animal studies performed following resolution of inflammatory pain showed reinstatement of tactile hypersensitivity induced by administration of a mu-opioid-antagonist, suggesting latent sensitization is mediated by endogenous opioids. In a recent crossover study in healthy volunteers, following resolution of a first-degree burn, 4 out of 12 volunteers developed large secondary areas of hyperalgesia areas after a naloxone infusion, while no volunteer developed significant secondary hyperalgesia after the placebo infusion. In order to consistently demonstrate latent sensitization in humans, a pain model inducing deep tissue inflammation, as used in animal studies, might be necessary. The aim of the present study is to examine whether a high-dose target-controlled naloxone infusion can reinstate pain and hyperalgesia following recovery from open groin hernia repair and thus consistently demonstrate opioid-mediated latent sensitization in humans. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients submitted to unilateral, primary, open groin hernia repair will be included in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. The experimental days take place 6-8 weeks after surgery, time-points at which patients are expected to be almost pain- free. Prior to administration of naloxone or placebo, the primary outcome (a summated measure of pain: at rest, during transition from supine to standing position, and evoked by pressure algometry) and the secondary outcomes (secondary hyperalgesia/allodynia, pressure pain thresholds, assessed at the surgical site and at the mirror-site in the contralateral groin, and, opioid withdrawal symptoms) will be assessed. These assessments will be repeated at each step of the target-controlled infusion of placebo or naloxone at estimated median (95 % CI) plasma concentrations of 344 ng/ml (130;567), 1059 ng/ml (400;1752) and 3196 ng/ml (1205;5276). DISCUSSION: We aim to demonstrate opioid-mediated latent sensitization in a post-surgical setting, using pain as a clinical relevant variable. Impairment of the protective endogenous opioid system may play an important role in the transition from acute to chronic pain. In order to sufficiently block the endogenous opioid system, a high-dose target-controlled naloxone-infusion is used, in accordance with recent findings in animal studies. EUDRACT: 2015-000793-36 (Registration date: 16 February 2015) Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01992146 (Registration date: 12 December 2014).

Prediction of in-vivo iontophoretic drug release data from in-vitro experiments-insights from modeling.

A strategy was developed to predict in-vivo plasma drug levels from data collected during in-vitro transdermal iontophoretic delivery experiments. The method used the principle of mass conservation and the Nernst-Planck flux equation to describe molecular transport across the skin. Distribution and elimination of the drug in the body followed a one- or two-compartment open model. Analytical expressions for the relaxation constant and plasma drug concentration were developed using Laplace transforms. The steady-state dermal flux was appropriate for predicting drug absorption under in-vivo conditions only when the time constant in the skin was far greater than its value in the blood compartment. A simulation study was conducted to fully assess the performance of estimations based on the equilibrium flux approximation. The findings showed that the normalized integral of squared error decreased exponentially as the ratio of the two time constants (blood/skin) increased. In the case of a single compartment, the error was reduced from 0.15 to 0.016 when the ratio increased from 10 to 100. The methodology was tested using plasma concentrations of a growth-hormone releasing factor in guinea pigs and naloxone in rats.