Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 141(23): 1915-1926, 2020 06 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32511001

RESUMO

The interrelationships between atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are complex and poorly understood, yet the number of patients with AF and HF continues to increase worldwide. Thus, there is a need for initiatives that prioritize research on the intersection between AF and HF. This article summarizes the proceedings of a virtual workshop convened by the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to identify important research opportunities in AF and HF. Key knowledge gaps were reviewed and research priorities were proposed for characterizing the pathophysiological overlap and deleterious interactions between AF and HF; preventing HF in people with AF; preventing AF in individuals with HF; and addressing symptom burden and health status outcomes in AF and HF. These research priorities will hopefully help inform, encourage, and stimulate innovative, cost-efficient, and transformative studies to enhance the outcomes of patients with AF and HF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Educação/normas , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/normas , Relatório de Pesquisa/normas , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Educação/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/métodos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Am J Epidemiol ; 187(11): 2265-2278, 2018 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29982273

RESUMO

Chronic lower respiratory diseases (CLRDs) are the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. To support investigations into CLRD risk determinants and new approaches to primary prevention, we aimed to harmonize and pool respiratory data from US general population-based cohorts. Data were obtained from prospective cohorts that performed prebronchodilator spirometry and were harmonized following 2005 ATS/ERS standards. In cohorts conducting follow-up for noncardiovascular events, CLRD events were defined as hospitalizations/deaths adjudicated as CLRD-related or assigned relevant administrative codes. Coding and variable names were applied uniformly. The pooled sample included 65,251 adults in 9 cohorts followed-up for CLRD-related mortality over 653,380 person-years during 1983-2016. Average baseline age was 52 years; 56% were female; 49% were never-smokers; and racial/ethnic composition was 44% white, 22% black, 28% Hispanic/Latino, and 5% American Indian. Over 96% had complete data on smoking, clinical CLRD diagnoses, and dyspnea. After excluding invalid spirometry examinations (13%), there were 105,696 valid examinations (median, 2 per participant). Of 29,351 participants followed for CLRD hospitalizations, median follow-up was 14 years; only 5% were lost to follow-up at 10 years. The NHLBI Pooled Cohorts Study provides a harmonization standard applied to a large, US population-based sample that may be used to advance epidemiologic research on CLRD.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/fisiopatologia , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pesos e Medidas Corporais , Bronquiectasia/epidemiologia , Bronquiectasia/fisiopatologia , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Coortes , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição por Inalação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/etnologia , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/normas , Fenótipo , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Função Respiratória , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 67(16): 1956-64, 2016 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27102511

RESUMO

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect, affecting about 0.8% of live births. Advances in recent decades have allowed >85% of children with CHD to survive to adulthood, creating a growing population of adults with CHD. Little information exists regarding survival, demographics, late outcomes, and comorbidities in this emerging group, and multiple barriers impede research in adult CHD. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Adult Congenital Heart Association convened a multidisciplinary working group to identify high-impact research questions in adult CHD. This report summarizes the meeting discussions in the broad areas of CHD-related heart failure, vascular disease, and multisystem complications. High-priority subtopics identified included heart failure in tetralogy of Fallot, mechanical circulatory support/transplantation, sudden cardiac death, vascular outcomes in coarctation of the aorta, late outcomes in single-ventricle disease, cognitive and psychiatric issues, and pregnancy.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Cardiopatias Congênitas/mortalidade , Cardiopatias Congênitas/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Coartação Aórtica/diagnóstico , Coartação Aórtica/mortalidade , Coartação Aórtica/cirurgia , Congressos como Assunto , Feminino , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Prognóstico , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Análise de Sobrevida , Tetralogia de Fallot/diagnóstico , Tetralogia de Fallot/mortalidade , Tetralogia de Fallot/cirurgia , Estados Unidos
4.
JAAPA ; 28(3): 30-6, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25675326

RESUMO

Elevated serum lipoproteins in childhood and adolescence are associated with health consequences and poor outcomes in adulthood. Universal screening, recommended in recent guidelines from the National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute and supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics, may help identify a significant number of children who would be missed by targeted screening.


Assuntos
Lipídeos/sangue , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/normas , Pediatria/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos
5.
Circ Res ; 115(7): 617-24, 2014 Sep 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25214575

RESUMO

RATIONALE: We previously demonstrated absence of association between peer-review-derived percentile ranking and raw citation impact in a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute cardiovascular R01 grants, but we did not consider pregrant investigator publication productivity. We also did not normalize citation counts for scientific field, type of article, and year of publication. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether measures of investigator prior productivity predict a grant's subsequent scientific impact as measured by normalized citation metrics. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 1492 investigator-initiated de novo National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01 grant applications funded between 2001 and 2008 and linked the publications from these grants to their InCites (Thompson Reuters) citation record. InCites provides a normalized citation count for each publication stratifying by year of publication, type of publication, and field of science. The coprimary end points for this analysis were the normalized citation impact per million dollars allocated and the number of publications per grant that has normalized citation rate in the top decile per million dollars allocated (top 10% articles). Prior productivity measures included the number of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-supported publications each principal investigator published in the 5 years before grant review and the corresponding prior normalized citation impact score. After accounting for potential confounders, there was no association between peer-review percentile ranking and bibliometric end points (all adjusted P>0.5). However, prior productivity was predictive (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Even after normalizing citation counts, we confirmed a lack of association between peer-review grant percentile ranking and grant citation impact. However, prior investigator publication productivity was predictive of grant-specific citation impact.


Assuntos
Financiamento Governamental/normas , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/normas , Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares/normas , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Controle de Qualidade , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Estados Unidos
6.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 29(9): 957-62, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23974712

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine how frequently emergency department (ED) physicians prescribe inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and describe commonly cited barriers. METHODS: We surveyed members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine between May and August 2011. Demographic data were collected. Using the knowledge-attitude-behavior model for barriers to physician guideline adherence, we asked 20 Likert scale questions regarding barriers to ICS prescribing. Our primary outcome was reported frequency of ICS prescribing. We defined frequent prescribers as those who prescribe ICS more than 25% of the time. Logistic regression models were built for each barrier category and identified barriers that predict infrequent prescribing. RESULTS: Two hundred seven (19.5%) of the 1062 surveyed responded; 75.8% report prescribing ICS 25% of the time or less. For knowledge, those who agreed that the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines are not clear regarding the ED physician's role were less likely to be frequent prescribers compared with those who disagreed (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.90). For attitude, those who agreed it is not the role of the ED physician to prescribe long-term medications were less likely to be frequent prescribers (adjusted OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.37). For behavior, those who agreed they do not routinely start long-term medications because they cannot see patients in follow-up were less likely to be frequent prescribers (adjusted OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department physicians report low rates of ICS prescribing. Commonly cited barriers include unclear guidelines, believing that long-term medication prescribing is not within their role, and inability to see patients in follow-up. Addressing guideline discrepancies may improve preventive care delivery in the ED.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/normas , Pediatria , Papel do Médico , Médicos/psicologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos
7.
Trials ; 14: 201, 2013 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23837497

RESUMO

There are numerous benefits to the research community from data sharing, and yet the open sharing of participant level data is not without potential pitfalls. In addition to the scientific community, the interests of study participants who volunteered their data must be considered, along with the interests of study investigators who expend a substantial amount of effort into the design, conduct, and analytical plans for the study. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) has developed a data-sharing protocol focused on balancing the interests of study participants, study investigators, and the research community with independent oversight by the NHLBI IRB. The data repository presently includes individual level data on more than 560,000 participants from 100 Institute-supported clinical trials and observational studies.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Comportamento Cooperativo , Bases de Dados Factuais , Disseminação de Informação , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.) , Projetos de Pesquisa , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Base de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais/normas , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)/normas , Direitos do Paciente , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Pesquisadores , Sujeitos da Pesquisa , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA