Graft kidney hydronephrosis caused by transplant ureter inguinal hernia: A case report.

RATIONALE: Ureteral obstruction of the graft kidney is a common complication of kidney transplantation. However, ureteral obstruction caused by inguinal hernia has rarely been reported. We present a rare case of ureteral obstruction with allograft dysfunction caused by an inguinal hernia. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 76-year-old man, who was a renal transplant recipient, presented with bilateral pitting oedema, reduced urine output, and right inguinal hernia. DIAGNOSES: Abdominal computed tomography revealed severe hydroureteronephrosis of the kidney allograft. A right inguinal hernia with ureteral incarceration was observed. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent graft percutaneous nephrostomy, followed by antegrade insertion of a double-J tube (DJ). Gradual improvement was observed in his renal function. Right inguinal herniorrhaphy was performed 5 days later. OUTCOMES: The renal function returned to normal after percutaneous nephrostomy and insertion of the DJ. A right inguinal direct-type hernia with ureter adhesion to the hernial sac was observed during the surgery. The posterior wall defect was repaired by the McVay technique. The DJ was removed after 1 month. The patient's renal function remained stable at 6-month follow-up. LESSONS: The orientation of the graft kidney has a significant influence on the location of the ureter. Upward orientation of the hilum will result in superficial location of the ureter, rendering it close to the hernial sac and susceptible to incarceration. The transplant surgeon should be aware of such a presentation of graft dysfunction with inguinal hernia to prevent a delay in the diagnosis and graft loss.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.

INTRODUCTION: The high success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the clearance of large renal calculi has made it a primary mode of surgical management in adults. Similarly, in children too PCNL has been gaining ground and the indications for the same are on the rise. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of this technique, in children below 18 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the inpatient, outpatient records, imaging films of all children with renal stones undergoing PCNL at our hospital. RESULTS: During the study period, 123 children underwent 129 PCNL at our centre for renal calculi. The mean age was 11.06 years and 87 (70.73%) of the children were males. The size of the stones varied from 15 to 37 mms in the longest diameter. A complete staghorn was noted in six (4.65%) and a partial staghorn in nine (6.97%) children. Supine PCNL was performed in 21 (16.2%) children and remaining 102 (83.7%) children underwent PCNL in prone position. The mean drop in haemoglobin was 1.24 gm%. Stone clearance was achieved in 122 (94.5%) children. Post-operatively four (3.1%) children needed blood transfusions due to excessive bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Refinements in percutaneous access techniques, miniaturization of instruments, and technologic advances in energy sources for lithotripsy have led to improvement of outcomes and have lowered the morbidity rates in children following PCNL. It is a safe and effective means of clearing large volumes of renal calculi with minimal morbidity.

Effect of Active Aspiration and Sheath Location on Intrapelvic Pressure During Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of location of the tip of percutaneous sheath and nephroscope in the collecting system together with active aspiration on the Intrapelvic pressure measurements (IPP) during miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (miniPNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 20 patients underwent miniPNL in supine position was collected prospectively. IPP measurements were done with an 8 Fr urodynamic pressure measurement catheter in 4 different settings with respect to location of tip of sheath and nephroscope. All 4 settings were repeated with active aspiration. Totally measurements were done and compared in 8 different settings for 90 seconds in each patient. RESULTS: Highest mean IPP measurements were recorded in setting II (35.3 ± 11.8 cm H2O) where the sheath was located in the calyx and the tip of the nephroscope was in the renal pelvis. When active aspiration was applied, the mean pressure measurements were significantly lower than the counterpart settings without aspiration (all P values <.0001). When the active aspiration was applied, intrarenal pressure measurements did not exceed 40 cm H2O in any settings in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: Location of the tip of the sheath and the nephroscope has significant effect on IPP measurements. Active aspiration significantly lowers the IPP and keeps it <40 cm H2O. Endourologists should be aware of possible alterations in IPP during miniPNL and active aspiration should be kept in mind as an effective solution to decrease the risk of complications related to high IPP.

An Observational Cohort Study Investigating the Incidence Rate of Infectious Complications After Routine Office Nephrostomy Tube Replacement Without Using Antimicrobial Prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of infectious complications after routine office nephrostomy tube replacement (NTR) in patients that did not receive antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled all patients undergoing routine office NTR between July 2018 and September 2019. Each procedure was considered an independent event. Clinical, microbiological, demographic data were collected. AMP was exclusion criterion. All patients received a questionnaire via phone call within 3 weeks after NTR investigating fever, antibiotics use, hospital admissions. Infectious complications risk was assessed with univariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five routine NTRs were performed. Nineteen patients receiving AMP were excluded. Median age was 78 years (interquartile range 71-81). Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was ≥5 in 53.2% of patients, 34 had positive urine culture, none received AMP. Seventeen (13.49%) patients reported fever after procedure, 9 received antibiotic therapy while fever resolved spontaneously in 8. Three patients needed hospitalization, 2 for nephrostomy malfunction, 1 for infectious complications. At multivariate analysis only CCI score ≥3 was associated (P < .001) with increased infectious complications risk. CONCLUSION: In this study fever occurs after the 13.5% of the routine NTRs, in almost half cases resolves spontaneously rather than with oral antimicrobial therapy. Avoiding AMP before routine NTR does not expose patients to life-threatening infections.

Non-invasive removal of self-locking entrapped nephrostomy tubes.

INTRODUCTION: The removal of an encrusted nephrostomy tube can be a challenging maneuver. Urological literature is very bare in detailing techniques for removal of entrapped percutaneous catheters. We present a simple, safe and non-invasive technique of nephrostomy removal using a vascular introducer sheath, useful to manage complicated situations such as nephrostomies blocked for severe encrustations or disabled in their self-locking system. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The nephrostomy tube is cut and the stump is passed with a suture needle. The suture is passed through the inner vascular introducer sheath tip, and the introducer is then removed. The introducer sheath is advanced over the nephrostomy until joining the pigtail segment, under fluoroscopy guidance. Thus the suture is pulled out with strenght to contrast the opposite stiffness of the encrusted coil, until the nephrostomy has safely come out. COMMENT: The sheath exchange technique is quick, involves less manipulation through the perirenal fascia and kidney, and is suitable for different conditions of entrapped nephrostomies.

A Novel Surgical Technique for Treatment of Renal Stones in Preschool-aged Patients: Initial Experience With Needle-perc.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate our newly developed minimal instrumentation technique, needle-perc, for treatment of preschool-aged patients with renal stones. To the best of our knowledge, this is the smallest endoscopic equipment for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reported thus far. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Needle-perc was performed in 8 patients using a 4.2-Fr needle to achieve access to the collecting system under ultrasonic guidance alone. The mean patient age was 2.4 years (range, 0-5 years). Five of the 8 patients were boys, while 3 were girls. Six patients had unilateral stones and 2 patients had bilateral stones. Six renal units exhibited single calculus, 2 exhibited staghorn stones, and 2 exhibited multiple stones. The mean calculus size was 1.6 cm (range, 0.8-4.5 cm). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed prospectively. RESULTS: Access was successfully achieved in all patients. Puncturing was fully guided by ultrasound. Five patients underwent needle-perc alone. Two patients were transferred to 16-Fr access because of intrarenal infection and large stone burden. One patient underwent reduction of tract number. The mean operative time was 49.2 minutes (range, 22-75 minutes); mean hemoglobin loss was 5.2 g/L (range, 0-13.8 g/L). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range, 3-7 days). Preplaced catheters were kept for 2-3 days to facilitate fragment discharge. Complications occurred in 2 patients: fever >38.5°C. The stone-free rate was 100% at 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Our initial data indicate that needle-perc is feasible and safe for preschool-aged renal patients. Further studies are required to define its usefulness in treatment of larger stones.

Comparison of two different minimally invasive percutaneous nephrostomy sheaths for the treatment of staghorn stones.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of using a conventional nephrostomy sheath (NS) vs using a new NS with suction and evacuation functions in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective and randomised study of 60 patients with staghorn stones randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients. One group underwent MPCNL using conventional NS, whereas the other group underwent MPCNL with suction-evacuation NS (SENS). Patient demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative data, perioperative data, and surgical results were collected and analysed. RESULTS: The patient demographics and stone characteristics were similar amongst the two groups. The SENS group had a significantly lower peak and a significantly lower average renal pelvic pressure (RPP) throughout the procedure. The SENS group was more efficient for stone removal and had a much shorter stone treatment time, a lesser use of the stone extractor, and ultimately a higher stone-free rate (SFR). The effects of a lower RPP and shorter stone treatment time translated into less severe postoperative complications as measured per modified Clavien grade. CONCLUSION: Using SENS in MPCNL for the treatment of staghorn stones has the advantages of lower RPP, increased effectiveness in stone retrieval, decreased surgery related complications, and an improved SFR.

Initial Clinical Experience with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Introduction and Objective: Current available lithotrites have clinical stone clearance rates averaging 24 to 32 mm2/minute. The objective of this study was to critically evaluate the initial experience with the Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy lithotrite during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with a minimum of 15 mm of stone in axial diameter at three locations (Indiana University, University of California Davis, and University of California San Diego) scheduled to undergo PCNL for nephrolithiasis over a 60-day trial period. We assessed objective measures of stone clearance time, stone clearance rate, device malfunction, stone-free rate, and complications. Each surgeon also evaluated subjective parameters from each case related to the use of Trilogy on a 1 to 10 scale (10 = extremely effective), and compared it with their usual lithotrite on a 1 to 5 scale (5 = much better). Results: We included 43 patients and had 7 bilateral (16.3%) cases, for a total of 50 renal units. One case was a mini-PCNL. Two cases experienced device malfunctions requiring troubleshooting but no transition to another lithotrite. The mean stone clearance rate was 68.9 mm2/minute. The stone-free rate on postoperative imaging was 67.6% (25 of 37 patients with available imaging). The lowest subjective rating was the ergonomic score of 6.7, and the highest subjective rating was the ease of managing settings score of 9.2. The surgeon impressions of ultrasound (7.3), ballistics (8.1), combination of ultrasound and ballistics (8.7), and suction (8.4) were high. One patient experienced an intraoperative renal pelvis perforation, one patient required a blood transfusion, one patient had a pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement, and one patient had a renal artery pseudoaneurysm requiring endovascular embolization. Conclusions: This multi-institutional study evaluated a new and efficient combination lithotrite that was perceived by surgeons to be highly satisfactory, with an excellent safety and durability profile.

Dislodgement in Long-Term Patients with Nephrostomy Tube: Risk Factors and Comparative Analysis Between Two Catheter Designs.

Objective: To determine possible risk factors for accidental nephrostomy tube dislodgement and compare two different tube types in this context in patients with chronic catheters. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of long-term patients with nephrostomy tube. We performed a comparative analysis, studying the possible variables that were related to catheter dislodgement. In addition, a subanalysis was also carried out comparing different catheter designs (Pigtail and Foley) in case this could be related to the dislodgement. Results: Two hundred five cases were collected. A total of 51.2% of cases had a pigtail nephrostomy and 48.8% Foley type, and accidental dislodgement occurred in 26.3% of cases. In multivariate analysis, we observed that first time nephrostomy tube placement entailed higher risk of accidental dislodgement than successive placements (odds ratio [OR] 1.95, confidence interval [CI] 1.01-3.74, p = 0.04). In the pigtail-type catheter patient subgroup, tubes placed by a resident were more prone to accidental dislodgement than those placed by an attending physician (OR 3.39, CI 1.29-8.91, p = 0.01), while first episode cases were more likely to have become dislodged than in a subsequent event (OR 3.17, CI 1.17-8.57, p = 0.02). In addition, the mean (in days) until nephrostomy tube dislodgement in cases where this occurred was 20.32 ± 3.52 for pigtail and 60.92 ± 5.15 for Foley (p < 0.01 in Kaplan-Meier's test). Conclusion: Nephrostomy tube displacement in long-term patients is a common problem. Some factors associated with the catheter could increase the risk of involuntary displacement, such as being a first event or being inserted by less experienced resident doctors. In addition, pigtail type nephrostomies tend toward accidental dislodgement earlier than Foley ones.

Trans-tract electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS: The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract electrocoagulation. RESULTS: Between the trans-tract electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P < 0.0001), shorter postoperative catheterization time (2.8 ± 3.8 vs 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6.5 ± 3.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.0001) in the trans-tract electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract electrocoagulation group. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-tract electrocoagulation in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient procedure that decreases the need for nephrostomy tube placement after surgery.

Dislodged Nephrostomy Catheter: An Unusual Case of Idiopathic Transposition of Nephrostomy Catheter From Transplanted Kidney to Adjacent Small Bowel Loop: A Case Report.

A 72-year-old man with a past medical history notable for deceased renal transplant presented to the interventional radiology department for routine right lower quadrant renal transplant nephroureteral catheter exchange. The nephroureteral catheter was placed in 2016 because of the presence of a hematoma causing partial page kidney and hydronephrosis. An antegrade nephrostogram was notable for opacification of the small bowel instead of the renal collecting system. The patient then subsequently developed urinary retention and intractable abdominal pain. Because of the combination of events, it was deemed necessary for laparotomy and surgical repair of the small bowel. Intraoperative findings were notable for small bowel adhesion to the abdominal wall but otherwise no evidence of acute inflammatory changes. In this case report, we describe the first case of an idiopathically dislodged nephrostomy catheter to the small bowel from a transplanted kidney and its successful management.

Safety and Effectiveness of Externalized Ureteral Catheter in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: To review the safety and effectiveness of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with an externalized ureteral catheter (EUC) compared with standard PCNL with nephrostomy tube and tubeless PCNL with double-J (DJ) stent following uncomplicated PCNL and the absence of residual stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with kidney stones who underwent uncomplicated PCNL between January 2000 to December 2017 and had no residual stones were retrospectively evaluated. The 766 patients were divided into standard PCNL with nephrostomy tube (group 1; 350 patients), tubeless PCNL with DJ stent (group 2; 189 patients), and tubeless PCNL with EUC (group 3; 227 patients). Demographic characteristics, stone-related factors, perioperative and postoperative parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: Demographic and stone-related characteristics were comparable. The differences in the mean operative time and complication rates were not significant. Postoperative hospitalization period was shorter in group 3 (3.19 ± 2.2 days) compared with group 1 (4.12 ± 2.4 days; p < .001) but not to that of group 2 (3.44 ± 2.8 days; p = .680). Postoperative pain score was lower in group 3 (3.24 ± 1.1) compared with both group 1 (6.36 ± 1.7; p < .001) and group 2 (4.85 ± 1.1; p < .001). Urine leakage complication was lower in group 3 (0.4%) compared with group 1 (2.9%, p = .038) but not to that of group 2 (0.5%; p = .897). CONCLUSIONS: Tubeless PCNL is effective and safe for uncomplicated PCNL in the absence of residual stones. Tubeless PCNL with EUC is associated with decreased pain, hospitalization time, and urine leakage compared with standard PCNL. However, it is only associated with decreased pain when compared with tubeless PCNL with DJ stent.

The Effect of Irrigation Power and Ureteral Access Sheath Diameter on the Maximal Intra-Pelvic Pressure During Ureteroscopy: In Vivo Experimental Study in a Live Anesthetized Pig.

Objectives: To assess the effect of irrigation settings and the size of ureteral access sheath (UAS) on the maximal intra-pelvic pressure (IPPmax) during ureteroscopy (URS) in pigs. Materials and Methods: In supine position, three anesthetized female pigs underwent cystoscopy to insert a 6F ureteral catheter in each ureter. Pigs were then turned to prone position to establish a percutaneous access, insert a 10F nephrostomy tube in the kidney, and connect it to a urodynamic device. An 8F semi-rigid ureteroscope or the Flex-X2 Flexible Ureteroscope was used with two irrigation settings: gravity flow and manual pumping using a commercial pump. URS was performed without UAS and with the UAS 9.5/11, 12/14, 14/16 at the ureteropelvic junction and the IPPmax was recorded. Results: Under gravity irrigation, the recorded IPPmax during semi-rigid URS in the distal ureter and the renal pelvis was 0 and 30 cmH2O, respectively. Further, the IPPmax during flexible URS in the renal pelvis without UAS, with UAS 9.5/11.5, with UAS 12/14, and with UAS 14/16 was 23, 6, 2, and 1 cmH2O, respectively. Under manual pumping, the IPPmax during semi-rigid URS in the distal ureter and the renal pelvis was 84 and 105 cmH2O, respectively. Further, the IPPmax during flexible URS in the renal pelvis without UAS, with UAS 9.5/11.5, with UAS 12/14, and with UAS 14/16 was 45, 46, 18, and 1 cmH2O, respectively. Conclusion: Manual pumping can significantly increase the IPPmax to unsafe levels during URS. The UAS can significantly decrease the IPPmax, even under manual pumping. The larger the UAS, the lower the IPPmax. The use of UAS can render URS safer by acting as a safeguard against the consequences of increased IPP, even under forced irrigation.

[Study and Analysis on the Test of Representative Products for Percutaneous Renal Puncture Device].

Percutaneous renal puncture device has very important clinical value. Qualified percutaneous renal puncture device is one of the important ways to evaluate its safety and efficacy, and it is also an important prerequisite for the device to be marketed in China. When manufactuers test the product, the selection of representative products is suggested from the aspects of performance parameter, structure, material and production process.

Application of a Self-Made Equipment for Patient Positioning during Percutaneous Nephroscopy in the Oblique-Supine Position.

BACKGROUND: The oblique-supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has advantages, but the position fixation methods are inadequate. This study aimed to analyze the PCNL outcomes using a patented self-made frame for oblique-supine position. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients scheduled to undergo PCNL at 2 hospitals in China between November 2009 and December 2016. The patients underwent PCNL in the oblique-supine position using the self-made position frame (n = 94). Operative time, stone clearance rate, intraoperative average systolic pressure, intraoperative average heart rate, intraoperative average airway pressure, intraoperative average intrapelvic pressure, and complications were observed. RESULTS: The patients were 45.3 ± 19.7 years old and 71% were male. Stones were of the size 2.5 ± 1.1 cm. The operative time was 95.6 min and the stone clearance rate was 81.9%. Intraoperative systolic blood pressure was 15.13 ± 1.68 kPa. Intraoperative airway pressure was 15.5 ± 2.3 cm H2O. Postoperative fever was observed in 3.2% of the patients. None had organ injury. Postoperative stay was 4.8 ± 0.6 days. The nephrostomy tube was routinely removed on the 5th day after surgery and the patients were discharged on the following day. CONCLUSION: The self-made surgical position frame met the position requirements for the oblique-supine PCNL operation. This surgical position frame deserves clinical application and promotion.

Clinical application of fluoroscopic guided percutaneous antegrade ureteral stents placement for the treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of fluoroscopic guided percutaneous antegrade ureteral stents placement used for treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction. METHODS: Between April 2016 and March 2018, fluoroscopic guided percutaneous ureteral stents was performed in 25 patients, including 7 patients (28%) with bilateral obstruction. The most common cancer diagnoses were cervical cancer (28%), rectal cancer (24%) and colon cancer (16%) among these patients. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the efficacy, safety and outcome of this treatment method. RESULTS: Percutaneous antegrade placement of ureteral stents was performed in all cases, including 12 ureters that failed in the initial retrograde ureteral stents placement. The median stent patency time for the antegrade ureteral stents were 10.4 (95% CI: 8.3-12.6) months. The primary complications included mild flank pain and discomfort (44%), hematuria (44%), urinary tract infection (8%), bladder irritation symptoms (4%), and arterial bleeding (4%). CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopic guided percutaneous ureteral stents placement is a safe, efficient procedure and has a high success rate in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction.

Percutaneous antegrade ureteral stent placement: single center experience.

PURPOSE: We aimed to present our clinical experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteral stent placement in a single center. METHODS: Electronic records of patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided ureteral stent placement between September 2005 and April 2017 were reviewed. A total of 461 patients (322 males, 139 females; age range, 19-94 years; mean age, 61.4±15 years) were included in the study. Patients were classified into two main groups: those with neoplastic disease and those with non-neoplastic disease. Failure was defined as persistence of high level of serum creatinine or an inability to place stents percutaneously. Postprocedural complications were grouped as percutaneous nephrostomy and stent placement related complications. RESULTS: A total of 727 procedures in 461 patients were included in the study: 654 procedures (90%) in 407 patients (88.3%) were in the neoplastic group and 73 procedures (10%) in 54 patients (11.7%) were in the non-neoplastic group. Our technical success rates were 97.7% and 100% and complication rates were 3.1% and 4.1% in neoplastic and non-neoplastic groups, respectively. Seven stents retrievals and 112 balloon dilatations were performed successfully. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous antegrade ureteral stent placement is a safe and effective method for management of ureteral injuries and obstructions due to both malignant and benign causes when the retrograde approach has failed.

Ureteral Catheter Versus Nephrostomy Tube for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospectively Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate overnight ureteral catheterization vs nephrostomy tube for urinary diversion in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) under spinal anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled using block randomization between February 2016 and July 2016. Patients with renal stones >2 cm confirmed via noncontrast-enhanced CT were included. All patients underwent PNL under spinal anesthesia. Group 1 refers to patients who had a nephrostomy tube following PNL, whereas group 2 refers to overnight ureteral catheterization. Those who refuse spinal anesthesia, <18 years of age, >70 years of age, and anomalous kidneys (ectopic pelvic kidney, horseshoe kidney, etc.) were excluded. In group 1, nephrostomy tube (14F) was removed 48 hours after surgery, whereas the ureteral catheter (6F) was removed at postoperative 12th hour in group 2. Visual analogue scores (VASs) at 24th hour and mean narcotic analgesic (tramadol) amounts were compared. RESULTS: There were 30 patients in both groups. Mean age, mean body mass index, and stone area were not significant between groups (p > 0.05, for all). With regard to operative measures, mean duration of surgery, mean number of accesses, and mean drop in Hb levels were comparable. Besides, mean hospitalization period in group 1 was 68.8 ± 12 hours, whereas it was 54.5 ± 10 hours in group 2 (p < 0.001). No patients in either group needed transfusion. Stone-free rates were similar in both groups (83% vs 90%, p = 0.391). Mean 24th hour VAS was 6.17 ± 1.4 in group 1 and 3.37 ± 1.4 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Also, there was a statistically significant difference in mean tramadol requirements between groups (181.67 ± 56.45 vs 86.67 ± 57.13, groups 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PNL under spinal anesthesia, using an open-ended ureteral catheter to be removed at early postoperative period reduces analgesic requirement and duration of hospital stay without compromising surgical outcomes and complication rates.

Characterization of Flow-Caused Intrarenal Pressure Conditions During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy In Vitro.

PURPOSE: To investigate renal pelvic pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the standard, mini, and ultramini PCNL systems. METHODS: We studied an ultramini PCNL system (UMP, outer shaft diameter 13F), a mini PCNL system (MPCNL, shaft 18F, nephroscope 12F), and a standard PCNL system (SPCNL, shaft 27F, nephroscope 24F). Pressure profiles were first investigated in an open model setup, subsequently in a closed model, and finally in an ex vivo porcine kidney. Measurements were determined with the nephroscope in an advanced and pulled-back position for all models. RESULTS: In the advanced position, maximum pressures of 41.61 ± 0.20 mmHg (UMP), 15.61 ± 0.15 mmHg (MPCNL), and 15.46 ± 0.14 mmHg (SPCNL) were measured in the closed model. In the pulled-back position, maximum pressures were 16.04 ± 0.22 mmHg (UMP), 17.02 ± 0.11 mmHg (MPCNL), and 20.50 ± 0.11 mmHg (SPCNL). In the ex vivo porcine kidney model, maximum pressures were 13.81 ± 6.04 mmHg (UMP), 5.64 ± 0.21 (MPCNL), and 9.21 ± 0.52 (SPCNL) with the nephroscope pushed to end position. After retracting the nephroscope from the outer shaft, pressures in all systems did not exceed 10 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum pressures achieved with the three PCNL systems in all three models were kept below the 30 mmHg critical threshold value. High pressures were only determined for the UMP system with the nephroscope pushed to its end position. This was attributed to the conical shape of the nephroscope, which occupies the space between the nephroscope and outer shaft, resulting in outflow obstruction.

Are Emergently Placed Nephrostomy Tubes Suitable for Subsequent Percutaneous Endoscopic Renal Surgery?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of emergently placed nephrostomy tubes (NT) that were subsequently deemed usable for definitive percutaneous nephrolithotomy or percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy in patients presenting with nephrolithiasis. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective database review was completed to identify patients who underwent emergent NT placement and then subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy or percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were collected. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients with 41 NTs met inclusion criteria. Indications for emergent NT placement were: obstruction with evidence of urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis (61%) and obstruction with acute kidney injury (39%). After recovery from the acute event and NT placement and during subsequent percutaneous surgical procedures, 9 NTs (22%) were sufficient without need for additional percutaneous access, 2 NTs (5%) were partially sufficient and were used in conjunction with an additional percutaneous access tract, and 30 NTs (73%) were unusable. CONCLUSION: In this multi-institutional review, only 22% of NTs placed for emergent indications were sufficient for subsequent percutaneous surgery without the creation of additional percutaneous tracts. Urologists should be prepared to obtain additional access during definitive percutaneous renal surgery in patients who have had a tube placed under emergent conditions.