Ozonetherapy protects from in-stent coronary neointimal proliferation. Role of redoxins.

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis and poor re-endothelization usually follow percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, even using drug-eluting stents, due to inflammation and oxidative stress. Medical ozone has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and has not been evaluated in this context. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether ozonotherapy might reduce restenosis following bare metal stents implantation in relation to the redoxin system in pigs. METHODS: Twelve male Landrace pigs (51±9kg) underwent percutaneous transluminal circumflex coronary arteries bare metal stent implantation under heparine infusion and fluoroscopical guidance, using standard techniques. Pigs were randomized to ozonetherapy (n=6) or placebo (n=6) treatment. Before stenting (24h) and twice a week for 30days post-stenting, venous blood was collected, ozonized and reinfused. Same procedure was performed in placebo group except for ozonation. Both groups received antiplatelet treatment. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry studies were performed. RESULTS: Severe inflammatory reaction and restenosis with increase in the immunohistochemical expression of thioredoxin-1 were observed in placebo group 30days after surgery. Oppositely, ozonetherapy drastically reduced inflammatory reaction and restenosis, and showed no increase in the Trx-1 immunohistochemical expression 30days after surgery. Immunolabeling for Prx-2 was negative in both groups. Ozonated autohemotherapy strikingly reduced restenosis 30days following PTCA with BMS implantation in pigs. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation of the redoxin system by ozone pretreatment might neutralize oxidative damage from the start and increase antioxidative buffering capacity post-injury, reducing further damage and so the demand for antioxidant enzymes. Our interpretation agrees with the ozone oxidative preconditioning mechanism, extensively investigated.

First-in-man study of simvastatin-eluting stent in de novo coronary lesions: the SIMVASTENT study.

BACKGROUND: Statins have anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative properties irrespective of their cholesterol-lowering effects. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a simvastatin-eluting stent (SimvES) in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two patients with de novo coronary artery lesions were assigned to SimvES, bare-metal stent (BMS) or everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation followed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for neointimal quantitative analysis. Six months later, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS were repeated. QCA showed no binary restenosis, a mean in-stent late loss of 1.05 ± 0.25 mm (BMS, 1.12 ± 0.48 mm; EES, 0.20 ± 0.16 mm) and a diameter stenosis of 33.5 ± 7.1% (BMS, 35.5 ± 15.30%; EES, 7.2 ± 3.12%). Control IVUS showed a mean in-stent obstruction of 18.3 ± 9.4% (BMS, 32.8 ± 19.1%; EES, 9.8 ± 2.4%) and a neointimal volume index of 1.58 ± 0.75 mm(3)/mm (BMS, 2.93 ± 1.76 mm(3)/mm; EES, 0.80 ± 0.16 mm(3)/mm). Thrombus, late incomplete apposition and major adverse cardiac events were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of patients with de novo coronary lesions, the use of a SimvES was not related to major adverse cardiac events, but it was associated with a higher level of neointimal proliferation than expected.

Assessing the temporal course of neointimal hyperplasia formation after different generations of drug-eluting stents.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the temporal course of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) formation following implantation of 2 different generations of drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND: The amount of NIH following DES implantation correlates with the potency of the antiproliferative drug, its kinetic release, as well as some individual characteristics, as the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM). Recently, some publications have suggested a continuous growth of NIH following DES, which in some cases, might result in late "catch-up." METHODS: Twenty-five patients with single, de novo lesions were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) (n = 12) and biolimus-eluting stents (BES) (n = 13) and underwent intravascular ultrasound evaluation immediately after the procedure and at 9-month and 5-year follow-ups. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the percentage of NIH obstruction between mid- and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age was 59 years and 28% of patients had DM. Overall, the percentage of NIH obstruction significantly increased from 9 months to 5 years (1.3% at first follow-up vs. 4.8% at second follow-up, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the variation of vessel volume (Δ = -0.70 mm(3)/mm BES vs. Δ = 0.18 mm(3)/mm SES, p = 0.56), lumen volume (Δ = 0.40 mm(3)/mm BES vs. Δ = -0.05 mm(3)/mm SES, p = 0.71), and percentage of NIH obstruction (Δ = 3.0% BES vs. Δ = 3.8% SES, p = 0.55) among DES. However, diabetic patients had a marked NIH increase along the years (NIH volume at second follow-up: 10.15 mm(3) DM vs. 5.11 mm(3) non-DM, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: The present serial intravascular ultrasound assessment supports the occurrence of continuous NIH growth following different generations of DES. These findings seem to be particularly more pronounced among patients with DM.

Rosiglitazona e lesão vascular em coelhos hipercolesterolêmicos: avaliação da formação neointimal / Rosiglitazone and vascular injury in hypercholesterolemic rabbits: neointimal formation assessment / Rosiglitazona y lesión vascular en conejos hipercolesterolémicos

FUNDAMENTO: O uso da rosiglitazona tem sido o objeto de extensas discussões. OBJETIVO: Avaliar os efeitos da rosiglitazona nas artérias ilíacas, no local da injúria e na artéria contralateral, de coelhos hipercolesterolêmicos submetidos à lesão por cateter-balão. MÉTODOS: Coelhos brancos machos receberam uma dieta hipercolesterolêmica através de gavagem oral por 6 semanas e foram divididos em 2 grupos: grupo rosiglitazona (GR - 14 coelhos tratados com rosiglitazona por 6 semanas) e grupo controle (GC - 18 coelhos sem rosiglitazona). Os animais foram submetidos a lesão por cateter-balão na artéria ilíaca direita no 14º dia. RESULTADOS: Na artéria ilíaca contralateral, não houve diferença significante na razão entre as áreas intimal e medial (RIM) entre os grupos GR e GC. A rosiglitazona não reduziu a probabilidade de lesões tipo I, II ou III (72,73 por cento vs 92,31 por cento; p=0,30) e lesões tipo IV ou V (27,27 por cento vs 7,69 por cento; p=0,30). Na artéria ilíaca homolateral, a área intimal era significantemente menor no GR quando comparado ao GC (p = 0,024). A área luminal era maior no GR quando comparado ao GC (p < 0,0001). Houve uma redução significante de 65 por cento na IMR no GR quando comparado ao GC (p = 0,021). Nenhum dos critérios histológicos para lesões ateroscleróticas tipos I a V (American Heart Association) foram encontrados na artéria ilíaca homolateral. CONCLUSÃO: Esses achados demonstram que a administração de rosiglitazona por 6 semanas impede a aterogênese no local da lesão, mas não em um vaso distante do sítio da lesão.

BACKGROUND: Rosiglitazone has been the focus of extensive discussion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of rosiglitazone on iliac arteries, both at the injury site and the contralateral artery, of hypercholesterolemic rabbits undergoing balloon catheter injury. METHODS: White male rabbits were fed a hypercholesterolemic diet by oral gavage for 6 weeks and divided into two groups as follows: rosiglitazone group (14 rabbits treated with rosiglitazone during 6 weeks) and the control group (18 rabbits without rosiglitazone). Animals underwent balloon catheter injury of the right iliac artery on the 14th day. RESULTS: In the contralateral iliac artery, there was no significant difference in the intima/media layer area ratio (IMR) between the control and rosiglitazone groups. Rosiglitazone did not reduce the probability of type I, II, or III lesions (72.73 percent vs 92.31 percent; p=0.30) and type IV or V lesions (27.27 percent vs 7.69 percent; p=0.30). As for the homolateral iliac artery, the intimal area was significantly lower in the rosiglitazone group, as compared to the control group (p = 0.024). The luminal layer area was higher in the rosiglitazone group vs. the control group (p < 0.0001). There was a significant reduction of 65 percent in the IMR in the rosiglitazone group vs the control group (p = 0.021). None of the histological criteria for type I-V atherosclerotic lesions (American Heart Association) were found in the homolateral iliac artery. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that rosiglitazone given for 6 weeks prevents atherogenesis at the injury site, but not in a vessel distant from the injury site.

FUNDAMENTO: El uso de rosiglitazona ha estado siendo el objeto de extensas discusiones. OBJETIVO: Evaluar los efectos de la rosiglitazona en las arterias ilíacas, en el local de la injuria y en la arteria contralateral, de conejos hipercolesterolémicos sometidos a la lesión por catéter-balón. MÉTODOS: Conejos blancos machos recibieron una dieta hipercolesterolémica a través de gavage oral por 6 semanas y se los dividieron en 2 grupos: grupo rosiglitazona (GR - 14 conejos tratados con rosiglitazona por 6 semanas) y grupo control (GC - 18 conejos sin rosiglitazona). Los animales se sometieron a lesión por catéter-balón en la arteria ilíaca derecha en el 14º día. RESULTADOS: En la arteria ilíaca contralateral, no hubo diferencia significativa en la razón entre las áreas íntima y media (RIM) entre los grupos GR y GC. La rosiglitazona no redujo la probabilidad de lesiones tipo I, II ó III (72,73 por ciento vs 92,31 por ciento; p=0,30) y lesiones tipo IV ó V (27,27 por ciento vs 7,69 por ciento; p=0,30). En la arteria ilíaca homolateral, el área intima era significantemente menor en el GR cuando comparado al GC (p = 0,024). El área luminal era mayor en el GR cuando comparado al GC (p < 0,0001). Hubo una reducción significante del 65 por ciento en la IMR en el GR cuando comparado al GC (p = 0,021). Ningún de los criterios histológicos para lesiones ateroscleróticas tipos I a V (American Heart Association) se encontraron en la arteria ilíaca homolateral. CONCLUSIÓN: Estos hallazgos demuestran que la administración de rosiglitazona por 6 semanas impide la aterogénesis en el local de la lesión, pero no en un vaso distante del sitio de la lesión.

Rosiglitazone and vascular injury in hypercholesterolemic rabbits: neointimal formation assessment.

BACKGROUND: Rosiglitazone has been the focus of extensive discussion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of rosiglitazone on iliac arteries, both at the injury site and the contralateral artery, of hypercholesterolemic rabbits undergoing balloon catheter injury. METHODS: White male rabbits were fed a hypercholesterolemic diet by oral gavage for 6 weeks and divided into two groups as follows: rosiglitazone group (14 rabbits treated with rosiglitazone during 6 weeks) and the control group (18 rabbits without rosiglitazone). Animals underwent balloon catheter injury of the right iliac artery on the 14th day. RESULTS: In the contralateral iliac artery, there was no significant difference in the intima/media layer area ratio (IMR) between the control and rosiglitazone groups. Rosiglitazone did not reduce the probability of type I, II, or III lesions (72.73% vs 92.31%; p=0.30) and type IV or V lesions (27.27% vs 7.69%; p=0.30). As for the homolateral iliac artery, the intimal area was significantly lower in the rosiglitazone group, as compared to the control group (p = 0.024). The luminal layer area was higher in the rosiglitazone group vs. the control group (p < 0.0001). There was a significant reduction of 65% in the IMR in the rosiglitazone group vs the control group (p = 0.021). None of the histological criteria for type I-V atherosclerotic lesions (American Heart Association) were found in the homolateral iliac artery. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that rosiglitazone given for 6 weeks prevents atherogenesis at the injury site, but not in a vessel distant from the injury site.