[Pathology and Pathophysiology of BPH and Relevant Incidental Findings in TUR-P]. / Pathologie und Pathophysiologie der BPH und relevante Zufallsbefunde in der TUR-P.

Pathology and Pathophysiology of BPH and Relevant Incidental Findings in TUR-P Abstract: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is defined as nodular prostate enlargement due to cellular proliferation of prostate glands and stroma. Beside adenocarcinoma, BPH is one of the most common diseases in the prostate. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is surgical treatment of choice for BPH. Resected tissue fragments are examined in the pathology and belong to the most commonly submitted urologic specimens. Up to date, pathophysiology of BPH is not yet completely understood. Different hormones such as androgens, dihydrotestosterone, estrogens as well as growth factors, inflammation, and environmental influences are important in the process. The diagnosis of BPH is usually straightforward. In this context, it is important to mention incidental findings, which may come along as "bad surprises" while examining TURP tissue fragments. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) or incidental acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate as well as the potential preneoplastic atypical adenomatoid hyperplasia (AAH) represent a few examples. According to literature, the histologic examination of TURP tissue reveals a high-grade PIN in up to 5%. Incidental adenocarcinoma is encountered in 5-13%. These frequencies justify a relatively laborious examination of the entire or majority resected TURP tissue.

Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate without High-Grade Invasive Adenocarcinoma: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is usually associated with high grade, aggresive acinar adenocarcinomas. IDC-P is supposed to result from the spread of the adenocarcinoma along the prostatic ducts. IDC-P rarely occurs without invasive carcinoma or with a coexistent low grade adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report two patients, 66 and 75 year-old, who presented IDC-P and low-grade acinar adenocarcinoma foci in their radical prostatectomy surgical specimens. RESULTS: Acinar adenocarcinomas were grade group 1, PTEN+, pT2. In the first case, the invasive adenocarcinoma was adjacent but nor intermingled with the IDC-P, and a discordance in the immunophenotype between them was outstanding (positivity for ERG in the acinar carcinoma being negative in the IDC-P). In the second case, the foci of adenocarcinoma were distant from the IDC-P. The first patient had not biochemical recurrence after a 34 month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This kind of cases supports the existence of an infrequent subtype of IDC-P that could be considered as an in situ neoplasia.

Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate without High-Grade Invasive Adenocarcinoma: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature

Objectives: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is usually associated with high grade, aggresive acinar adenocarcinomas. IDC-P is supposed to result from the spread of the adenocarcinoma along the prostatic ducts. IDC-P rarely occurs without invasive carcinoma or with a coexistent low grade adenocarcinoma. Material and Methods: We report two patients, 66 and 75 year-old, who presented IDC-P and low-grade acinar adenocarcinoma foci in their radical prostatectomy surgical specimens. Results: Acinar adenocarcinomas were grade group 1, PTEN+, pT2. In the first case, the invasive adenocarcinoma was adjacent but nor intermingled with the IDC-P, and a discordance in the immunophenotype between them was outstanding (positivity for ERG in the acinar carcinoma being negative in the IDC-P). In the second case, the foci of adenocarcinoma were distant from the IDC-P. The first patient had not biochemical recurrence after a 34 month follow-up period. Conclusions: This kind of cases supports the existence of an infrequent subtype of IDC-P that could be considered as an in situ neoplasia (AU)

Objetivos: El carcinoma intraductal de la próstata(CIDP) aparece generalmente asociado a adenocarcinomasacinares agresivos, de alto grado. En general se cree que elCIDP representa una forma de diseminación deladenocarcinoma a los ductos prostáticos. En ocasiones elCIDP aparece, sin embargo, sin tumor infiltrante o conadenocarcinomas de bajo grado.Material y Métodos: Presentamos dos pacientes de66 y 75 años, que en las piezas de prostatectomía radicalpresentaron CIDP y focos de adenocarcinoma acinar degrupo de grado bajo.Resultados: Los adenocarcinomas acinares eran degrupo de grado 1, PTEN+, pT2. En el primer caso, eladenocarcinoma se localizaba adyacente, pero noentremezclado, con el CIDP, y destacaba la discordanciaen el inmunofenotipo entre el adenocarcinoma, ERG+, y elCIDP, que era ERG-. En el segundo, los focos de adenocarcinoma se localizaban a distancia del CIDP. Elprimer paciente no ha presentado recidiva bioquímica tras34 meses de seguimiento.Conclusiones: Las características de los casos quepresentamos apoyan la existencia de un subtipoinfrecuente de CIDP que se podría considerar como unaneoplasia in situ. (AU)

Evaluation of angiogenic apelin/apelin receptor axis in normal prostate, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostatic adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in American men. Apelin is an endogenous peptide identified as the ligand of the G protein-associated apelin receptor. Apelin and apelin receptor have many tissues distribution and they participate in pathological processes, such as cancer. Apelin stimulates cancer angiogenesis. However, there are insufficient data in the literature regarding the role of apelin/apelin receptor in normal tissue, highgrade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and prostatic adenocarcinoma tissues. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the apelin and apelin receptor expression levels in tissues of normal prostate tissue, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and prostatic adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 38 samples of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were used. Among 38 samples; 20 patients were with prostatic adenocarcinoma, 18 patients were with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adjacent normal prostatic tissue areas. The immunolocalisation of apelin and apelin receptor in these tissues were determined immunohistochemically. RESULTS: Apelin and apelin receptor expressions were higher in prostatic adenocarcinoma than normal prostate tissue and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Apelin receptor expression was also increased in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia compared to normal tissue. CONCLUSION: Apelin and apelin receptor are increase in the process of prostate carcinogenesis. This increase may adversely affect the clinical course of prostate cancer patients by stimulating angiogenesis, which is important for invasion and metastasis in prostate cancer.

FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in normal prostate tissue, postatrophic hyperplasia, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and tumor histological lesions in men with and without prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The tumor promoting or counteracting effects of the immune response to cancer development are thought to be mediated to some extent by the infiltration of regulatory T cells (Tregs ). In the present study we evaluated the prevalence of Treg populations in stromal and epithelial compartments of normal, post atrophic hyperplasia (PAH), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and tumor lesions in men with and without prostate cancer. METHODS: Study subjects were 102 men consecutively diagnosed with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy and 38 men diagnosed with bladder cancer undergoing cystoprostatectomy without prostate cancer at the pathological examination. Whole mount sections from all patients were evaluated for the epithelial and stromal expression of CD4+ Tregs and CD8+ Tregs in normal, PAH, PIN, and tumor lesions. A Friedmans test was used to investigate differences in the mean number of Tregs across histological lesions. Logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for prostate cancer for each histological area. RESULTS: In men with prostate cancer, similarly high numbers of stromal CD4+ Tregs were identified in PAH and tumor, but CD4+ Tregs were less common in PIN. Greater numbers of epithelial CD4+ Tregs in normal prostatic tissue were positively associated with both Gleason score and pT-stage. We observed a fourfold increased risk of prostate cancer in men with epithelial CD4+ Tregs in the normal prostatic tissue counterpart. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may suggest a possible pathway through which PAH develops directly into prostate cancer in the presence of CD4+ Tregs and indicate that transformation of the anti-tumor immune response may be initiated even before the primary tumor is established.

"Finding the needle in a haystack": oncologic evaluation of patients treated for LUTS with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

PURPOSE: To evaluate oncologic parameters of men with bothersome LUTS undergoing surgical treatment with HoLEP or TURP. METHODS: Five hundred and eighteen patients undergoing HoLEP (n = 289) or TURP (n = 229) were retrospectively analyzed for total PSA, prostate volume, PSA density, history of prostate biopsy, resected prostate weight, and histopathological features. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of incidental PCa (iPCa). RESULTS: Men undergoing HoLEP had a significantly higher total PSA (median 5.5 vs. 2.3 ng/mL) and prostate volume (median 80 vs. 41 cc), and displayed a greater reduction of prostate volume after surgery compared to TURP patients (median 71 vs. 50%; all p < 0.001). With a prevalence of incidental PCa (iPCa) of 15 and 17% for HoLEP and TURP, respectively, the choice of procedure had no influence on the detection of iPCa (p = 0.593). However, a higher rate of false-negative preoperative prostate biopsies was noted among iPCa patients in the HoLEP arm (40 vs. 8%, p = 0.007). In multivariate logistic regression, we identified patient age (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.013) and PSA density (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.09-4.18, p = 0.028) as independent predictors for the detection of iPCa. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in oncologic parameters, the choice of technique had no influence on the detection of iPCa. Increased patient age and higher PSA density were associated with iPCa. A higher rate of false-negative preoperative prostate biopsies was noted in HoLEP patients. Therefore, diagnostic assessment of LUTS patients requires a more adapted approach to exclude malignancy, especially in those with larger prostates.

Atypical Intraductal Cribriform Proliferations of the Prostate Exhibit Similar Molecular and Clinicopathologic Characteristics as Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate.

Atypical intraductal cribriform proliferations of the prostate (AIP) are loose cribriform proliferations of luminal cells that exhibit greater architectural complexity and/or nuclear atypia than high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), but lack the diagnostic criteria for intraductal carcinoma (IDC). The significance of AIP has not been formally established. We compared the clinical, morphologic, and immunohistochemical characteristics of AIP with classic IDC in 310 radical prostatectomy specimens that were received over an 18-month period. Of the 310 cases, 46 cases had AIP only (n=10), IDC only (n=6), or AIP coexisting with IDC (n=30). The ERG status of all 46 AIP/IDC cases was identical to the nearby acinar carcinoma, contrasted to just 3 cases of HGPIN (7%, P<0.01). The degree of uniform phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss in 34 selected cases was identical in AIP and IDC (66.7%). No foci of HGPIN showed uniform PTEN loss; there was only 38% concordance of PTEN expression pattern between HGPIN and the nearby acinar carcinoma, unlike AIP and IDC (77% and 81%, respectively, P<0.01). AIP-associated and/or IDC-associated carcinoma (n=46) showed a higher stage and grade compared with acinar-only carcinoma (n=264, P<0.01). AIP-associated carcinoma had similar clinicopathologic features as IDC-associated carcinoma, including preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node metastasis (n=36, P>0.05). In conclusion, AIP shares similar ERG/PTEN immunoprofiles and exhibits similar clinical behavior as IDC, warranting immediate repeat biopsy when AIP is identified on biopsy, as is recommended in the most recent WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs, 2016.

Ankyrin G expression is associated with androgen receptor stability, invasiveness, and lethal outcome in prostate cancer patients.

Ankyrin G (ANK3) is a member of the Ankyrin family, which functions to provide cellular stability by anchoring the cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane. Deregulation of ANK3 expression has been observed in multiple human cancers but its mechanism remains unknown. ANK3 expression in relation to disease progression and patients' outcome was investigated in two cohorts of prostate cancer (PCA). Mechanistic studies were carried out in vitro and in vivo using several PCA cell lines and the avian embryo model. Silencing ANK3 resulted in significant reduction of cell proliferation through an AR-independent mechanism. Decreased ANK3 expression delayed S phase to G2/M cell cycle transition and reduced the expression of cyclins A and B. However, cells with knocked-down ANK3 exhibited significant increase in cell invasion through an AR-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, we found that ANK3 is a regulator of AR protein stability. ANK3 knockdown also promoted cancer cell invasion and extravasations in vivo using the avian embryo model (p < 0.01). In human samples, ANK3 expression was dramatically upregulated in high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and localized PCA (p < 0.0001). However, it was downregulated castration resistant stage (p < 0.0001) and showed inverse relation to Gleason score (p < 0.0001). In addition, increased expression of ANK3 in cancer tissues was correlated with better cancer-specific survival of PCA patients (p = 0.012). KEY MESSAGE: Silencing ANK3 results in significant reduction of cell proliferation through an AR-independent mechanism. ANK3 knockdown results in significant increase in cell invasion through an AR-dependent mechanism. ANK3 is a regulator of AR protein stability. ANK3 knockdown also promotes cancer cell invasion and extravasation in vivo using the avian embryo model.

MAGI-2 Is a Sensitive and Specific Marker of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison With AMACR.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the utility of membrane-associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain-containing protein 2 (MAGI-2) and α-methylacyl CoA (AMACR) by immunohistochemistry in diagnosing prostatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-eight radical prostatectomies were used to construct three tissue microarrays with 512 cores, including benign prostatic tissue, benign prostatic hyperplasia, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and adenocarcinoma. AMACR and MAGI-2 immunohistochemistry were evaluated by visual and image analysis. RESULTS: MAGI-2 and AMACR were significantly higher in adenocarcinoma and HGPIN compared with benign tissue. At H-score cutoffs of 300 and 200, MAGI-2 was more accurate in distinguishing benign from malignant glands than AMACR. Areas under the curve by image and visual analysis were 0.846 and 0.818 for MAGI-2 and 0.937 and 0.924 for AMACR, respectively. The accuracy of MAGI-2 in distinguishing benign from malignant glands on the same core was higher (95% vs 88%). CONCLUSIONS: MAGI-2 could represent a useful adjunct for diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma, especially when AMACR is not discriminatory.

ERG and PTEN status of isolated high-grade PIN occurring in cystoprostatectomy specimens without invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is widely believed to represent a precursor to invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma. However, recent molecular studies have suggested that retrograde spread of invasive adenocarcinoma into pre-existing prostatic ducts can morphologically mimic HGPIN. Thus, previous molecular studies characterizing morphologically identified HGPIN occurring in radical prostatectomies or needle biopsies with concurrent invasive carcinoma may be partially confounded by intraductal spread of invasive tumor. To assess ERG and PTEN status in HGPIN foci likely to represent true precursor lesions in the prostate, we studied isolated HGPIN occurring without associated invasive adenocarcinoma in cystoprostatectomies performed at Johns Hopkins between 2009 and 2014. Of 344 cystoprostatectomies, 33% (115/344) contained invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma in the partially submitted prostate (10 blocks/case on average) and were excluded from the study. Of the remaining cases without sampled cancer, 32% (73/229) showed 133 separate foci of HGPIN and were immunostained for ERG and PTEN using genetically validated protocols. Of foci of HGPIN with evaluable staining, 7% (8/107) were positive for ERG. PTEN loss was not seen in any HGPIN lesion (0/88). Because these isolated HGPIN foci at cystoprostatectomy are unlikely to represent retrograde spread of invasive tumor, our study suggests that ERG rearrangement, but not PTEN loss, is present in a minority of potential neoplastic precursor lesions in the prostate.

MAGI-2 in prostate cancer: an immunohistochemical study.

Membrane-associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain-containing protein 2 (MAGI-2) is a scaffolding protein that links cell adhesion molecules, receptors, and signaling molecules to the cytoskeleton and maintains the architecture of cell junctions. MAGI-2 gene rearrangements have recently been described in prostate cancer. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of MAGI-2 protein in prostate tissue. Seventy-eight radical prostatectomies were used to construct 3 tissue microarrays consisting of 512 cores, including benign tissue, benign prostatic hyperplasia, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and adenocarcinoma, Gleason patterns 3 to 5. Immunohistochemistry for phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) and double-stain MAGI-2/p63 was performed and analyzed by visual and image analysis, the latter as percent of analyzed area (%AREA), and mean optical density multiplied by %AREA (STAIN). By visual and image analysis, MAGI-2 was significantly higher in adenocarcinoma and HGPIN compared with benign (benign versus HGPIN P < .001; benign versus adenocarcinoma, P < .001). HGPIN and adenocarcinoma did not significantly differ by either modality. Using visual intensity to distinguish benign tissue and adenocarcinoma, a receiver operating curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.902. A STAIN threshold of 1470 yielded a sensitivity of 0.66 and specificity of 0.96. There was a significant correlation between PTEN and MAGI-2 staining for normal and benign prostatic hyperplasia, but this was lost in HGPIN and cancer. We conclude that MAGI-2 immunoreactivity is elevated in prostate cancer and HGPIN compared with normal tissue, and suggest that MAGI-2 may contribute to prostate carcinogenesis. This is the first report of MAGI-2 staining by immunohistochemistry in prostate cancer.

Expression of store-operated channel components in prostate cancer: the prognostic paradox.

In vitro studies in prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines have suggested a key and complex role of the store-operated channels (SOCs) in major cancer hallmarks, including proliferation, apoptosis, and migration. In the present study, we investigated in vivo the expression of the SOC components transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) 1, TRPC4, Orai1, and stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), during all stages of PCa progression, and evaluated their prognostic impact in clinically localized cancer (CLC). The expressions of TRPC1, TRPC4, Orai1, STIM1, and the androgen receptor and the proliferation marker Ki-67 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays containing samples of normal prostate tissues (n=91), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (n=61), CLC surgically treated (n=238), and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC; n=45). All markers significantly increased in CLC compared with normal tissues and (for Orai1 and STIM1) in advanced pT3 tumors compared with pT2. In contrast, their expression decreased in CRPC, particularly for Orai1. In CLC, staining for TRPC1, Orai1 and STIM1 correlated with androgen receptor expression, and TRPC1 status was associated with lower proliferation and longer recurrence-free survival, after adjusting for classical prognostic markers. Although increased SOC expression during PCa progression supports a role in cancer cell migration, the inverse association between TRPC1 and biochemical relapse suggests a protective effect in CLC. Moreover, the dramatic down-regulation of Orai1 in CRPC supports its role in apoptosis at this stage of the disease. These results call for caution when considering SOCs as potential therapeutic targets for PCa.

ERG overexpression and multifocality predict prostate cancer in subsequent biopsy for patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

PURPOSE: The most important clinical significance of an isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) diagnosis is the risk of missed prostate cancer (PCa) in subsequent biopsies. Because most patients with HGPIN do not harbor or develop PCa, clinical, pathological, or molecular markers that predict of PCa risk are of clinical significance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 155 men with a diagnosis of isolated HGPIN, which was based on the results of extended biopsy, and who underwent at least one repeat biopsy were analyzed for ERG oncoprotein (ERG) expression and clinicopathological parameters to determine the risk of finding PCa in subsequent biopsies. RESULTS: Of 155 patients diagnosed with HGPIN on initial biopsy, 39 (25%) had PCa on subsequent biopsies. For men with only one repeat biopsy, the cancer detection rate was 22%. Most (54%) PCas were detected in≤6 months of rebiopsy. ERG expression was present in 15 patients with HGPIN (9.6%). Patients with ERG expression in HGPIN were more likely to have PCa in repeat biopsy, with 9 (60%) ERG-positive and 30 (21%) of ERG-negative patients having PCa (P = 0.001). Multifocal involvement (P = 0.0001), cribriform morphology (P = 0.004), and bilaterality (P = 0.0075) of HGPIN were other significant risk factors. On multivariable analysis, only the presence of ERG positivity and multifocality remained significant parameters in detecting PCa on a repeat biopsy. The presence of ERG-negative focal HGPIN involving one core, which accounted for 46% of patients, had minimal (16%) PCa risk on subsequent biopsy. In total, 8 patients (89%) ERG-positive HGPIN had PCa identified at identical sites on subsequent biopsy, of which 5 (71%) were ERG positive. CONCLUSIONS: The status of ERG expression in HGPIN along with other histological parameters stratifies patients into low- and high-risk groups for having PCa on subsequent biopsy. Our results further support molecular characterization of HGPIN as a means to improve risk stratification and optimize surveillance strategies.

Multiple cores of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and any core of atypia on first biopsy are significant predictor for cancer detection at a repeat biopsy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in the cancer detection rate and pathological findings on a second prostate biopsy according to benign diagnosis, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on first biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,323 patients who underwent a second prostate biopsy between March 1995 and November 2012. We divided the patients into three groups according to the pathologic findings on the first biopsy (benign diagnosis, HGPIN, and ASAP). We compared the cancer detection rate and Gleason scores on second biopsy and the unfavorable disease rate after radical prostatectomy among the three groups. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients (16.2%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer on a second biopsy. The rate of cancer detection was 14.6% in the benign diagnosis group, 22.1% in the HGPIN group, and 32.1% in the ASAP group, respectively (p<0.001). When patients were divided into subgroups according to the number of positive cores, the rate of cancer detection was 16.7%, 30.5%, 31.0%, and 36.4% in patients with a single core of HGPIN, more than one core of HGPIN, a single core of ASAP, and more than one core of ASAP, respectively. There were no significant differences in Gleason scores on second biopsy (p=0.324) or in the unfavorable disease rate after radical prostatectomy among the three groups (benign diagnosis vs. HGPIN, p=0.857, and benign diagnosis vs. ASAP, p=0.957, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multiple cores of HGPIN or any core number of ASAP on a first biopsy had a significantly higher cancer detection rate on a second biopsy. Repeat biopsy should be considered and not be delayed in those patients.

Prostate cancer after initial high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and benign prostate biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist on long term pathological outcomes in patients with initial prostate biopsies showing either high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) or benign findings, who are subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative characteristics of patients showing either HGPIN or benign initial prostate biopsies were investigated and compared in patients with and without a subsequent diagnosis of prostate cancer. We also compared the biopsy and prostatectomy findings in patients with prostate cancer in both groups. RESULTS: We evaluated 161 and 85 patients with initial HGPIN and benign prostate biopsies, respectively, who underwent a subsequent biopsy. After a median follow up of 11 years, prostate cancer was detected in 26.7% patients after HGPIN and in 22.3% patients after initial benign biopsy. Ninety-eight percent of positive biopsies after initial HGPIN demonstrated either Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 (86%) or GS 3 + 4 (12%). In the benign group, 100% of patients demonstrated prostate cancer on biopsy with either GS 3 + 3 (58%) or GS 3 + 4 (42%). Of 35 patients who underwent prostatectomy (22 after initial HGPIN biopsy and 13 after initial benign biopsy), all had node negative, organ-confined disease; 86% and 54% patients had GS6 disease, with = 5% tumor volume found in 91% and 62% of the HGPIN and benign group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with initial HGPIN or benign biopsies preceding a diagnosis of prostate cancer usually show favourable pathology on positive biopsy and prostatectomy, most commonly exhibiting low volume and low grade disease. These findings may help clinicians risk-stratify patients who may benefit from conservative management options.

Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: Morphologic Features, Differential Diagnoses, Significance, and Reporting Practices.

The differential diagnosis for atypical cribriform lesions of the prostate has become increasingly complex and includes intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and atypical intraductal proliferations. In this review, we summarize the morphologic and molecular features and significance of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. We also summarize our institution's strategy for reporting and treatment recommendations for intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

Clinical features and prognosis of prostate cancer with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical features and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 893 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy for PCa between 2011 and 2012 at Asan Medical Center; 752 of these patients who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy and were followed up for more than 1 year were included. The cohort was divided into two groups-patients with and without HGPIN-and their characteristics were compared. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze factors affecting BCR. RESULTS: In total, 652 study patients (86.7%) had HGPIN. There were no significant differences in preoperative factors between the two groups, including age (p=0.369) and preoperative prostate-specific antigen concentration (p=0.234). Patients with HGPIN had a higher Gleason score (p=0.012), more frequent multiple tumor (p=0.013), and more perineural invasion (p=0.012), but no other postoperative pathologic characteristics were significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in BCR (13.0% vs. 11.5%, p=0.665) and HGPIN was not associated with BCR (p=0.745). In multivariate analysis, only the T stage (p<0.001) was associated with BCR. CONCLUSIONS: PCa patients with HGPIN have a higher Gleason score, more frequent multiple tumors, and more perineural invasion than those without HGPIN. The presence of HGPIN is not an independent predictor of BCR.

The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypia on prostate biopsy does not adversely affect prostatectomy outcomes for patients otherwise eligible for active surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if the presence of concomitant high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) or atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on biopsy increases the risk of occult adverse pathology in patients otherwise suitable for active surveillance (AS). METHODS: Patients with D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer on ≥ 10-core biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy at our academic center were evaluated for eligibility for AS by either Epstein criteria or Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. Prostatectomy specimens of patients eligible for AS were compared to determine if the presence of clinical HGPIN or ASAP affected the primary outcomes of pathologic upstaging and Gleason score upgrading. RESULTS: Of 553 patients with low-risk prostate cancer, 400 patients (72.3%) met the MSKCC criteria, whereas only 170 patients (30.7%) met the Epstein criteria. HGPIN was present in approximately 32%, and ASAP in approximately 12%, of each AS cohort. On univariate and multivariate analyses, HGPIN and ASAP had no impact on the rate of upgrading and upstaging in either Epstein or MSKCC AS-eligible patients. Furthermore, the presence of HGPIN and ASAP had no impact on the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION: The presence of HGPIN or ASAP does not increase the risk of upgrading, upstaging, or adverse pathology at the time of prostatectomy for patients who meet the AS criteria. If otherwise suitable, HGPIN and ASAP should not impact the decision to choose AS. However, analysis of prospective AS trials is required to determine if HGPIN or ASAP impacts tumor progression once on AS.

Heterogeneous clinicopathological features of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: a comparison between "precursor-like" and "regular type" lesions.

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) has been described as a lesion associated with intraductal spread of invasive carcinoma and consequently aggressive disease. However, there are a few reported cases of pure IDC-P without an associated invasive component, strongly suggesting that this subset of IDC-P may represent a precursor lesion. We compared the clinicopathological features between the morphologically "regular type" IDC-P and "precursor-like" IDC-P. IDC-P was defined as follows; 1) solid/dense cribriform lesions or 2) loose cribriform/micropapillary lesions with prominent nuclear pleomorphism and/or non-focal comedonecrosis. We defined precursor-like IDC-P as follows; 1) IDC-P without adjoining invasive adenocarcinoma but carcinoma present distant from the IDC-P or 2) IDC-P having adjoining invasive microcarcinoma (less than 0.05 ml) and showing a morphologic transition from high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) to the IDC-P. IDC-P lacking the features of precursor-like IDC-P was categorized as regular type IDC-P. Of 901 radical prostatectomies performed at our hospital, 141 and 14 showed regular type IDC-P and precursor-like IDC-P in whole-mounted specimens, respectively. Regular type IDC-P cases had significantly higher Gleason score, more frequent extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion, more advanced pathological T stage, and lower 5-year biochemical recurrence-free rate than precursor-like IDC-P cases. Multivariate analysis revealed nodal metastasis and the presence of regular type IDC-P as independent predictors for biochemical recurrence. Our data suggest that IDC-P may be heterogeneous with variable clinicopathological features. We also suggest that not all IDC-P cases represent intraductal spread of pre-existing invasive cancer, and a subset of IDC-P may be a precursor lesion.

Limited significance of activated Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway in prostate cancer progression.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the significance of the activated Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin (Akt-mTOR) signaling pathway in the progression of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression levels of Akt, phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt), mTOR and phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR) in 175 prostate specimens, including 61 normal prostate tissues as a control, 24 high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias (HGPINs) and 90 clinically localized prostate cancers, were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. p-Akt and p-mTOR ratios, which were defined as the expression level of p-Akt in relation to that of Akt and the expression level of p-mTOR in relation to that of mTOR, respectively, in these specimens were calculated. RESULTS: Expression levels of all four molecules, including Akt, p-Akt, mTOR and p-mTOR, were significantly greater in the HGPIN group compared with the normal control and prostate cancer groups. Furthermore, the p-Akt ratio in the prostate cancer group was significantly lower than that in the HGPIN group, while there was no significant difference in the p-mTOR ratio between the HGPIN and prostate cancer groups. In the prostate cancer group, no significant relationships were observed between major clinicopathological parameters and the expression levels as well as the ratios of p-Akt or p-mTOR. CONCLUSIONS: The Akt-mTOR signaling pathway may play a limited role in the progression of prostate cancer.