Novel Use of Circulating Tumor DNA to Identify Muscle-invasive and Non-organ-confined Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Optimal patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgical extirpation is limited by the inaccuracy of contemporary clinical staging methods in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the detection of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can predict muscle-invasive (MI) and non-organ-confined (NOC) UTUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Plasma cell-free DNA was prospectively collected from chemotherapy-naïve, high-risk UTUC patients undergoing surgical extirpation and sequenced using a 152-gene panel and low-pass whole-genome sequencing. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: To test for concordance, whole-exome sequencing was performed on matching tumor samples. The performance of ctDNA for predicting MI/NOC UTUC was summarized using the area under a receiver-operating curve, and a variant count threshold for predicting MI/NOC disease was determined by maximizing Youden's J statistic. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated survival, and Mantel-Cox log-rank testing assessed the association between preoperative ctDNA positivity and clinical outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 30 patients enrolled prospectively, 14 were found to have MI/NOC UTUC. At least one ctDNA variant was detected from 21/30 (70%) patients, with 52% concordance with matching tumor samples. Detection of at least two panel-based molecular alterations yielded 71% sensitivity at 94% specificity to predict MI/NOC UTUC. Imposing this threshold in combination with a plasma copy number burden score of >6.5 increased sensitivity to 79% at 94% specificity. Furthermore, the presence of ctDNA was strongly prognostic for progression-free survival (PFS; 1-yr PFS 69% vs 100%, p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; 1-yr CSS 56% vs 100%, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The detection of plasma ctDNA prior to extirpative surgery was highly predictive of MI/NOC UTUC and strongly prognostic of PFS and CSS. Preoperative ctDNA demonstrates promise as a biomarker for selecting patients to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to nephroureterectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Here, we show that DNA from upper tract urothelial tumors can be detected in the blood prior to surgical removal of the kidney or ureter. This circulating tumor DNA can be used to predict that upper tract urothelial carcinoma is invasive into the muscular lining of the urinary tract and may help identify those patients who could benefit from chemotherapy prior to surgery.

Copy number gain of ACTN4 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

α-Actinin4 (ACTN4), an isoform of non-muscular α-actinin, is involved in enhancing cell motility and promoting cancer infiltration and metastasis in various cancers. However, information remains limited regarding the pathological significance of ACTN4 expression in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUTUCs). We obtained tumor samples from 168 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed UUTUCs (92 with renal pelvic cancers and 76 with ureteral cancers), who were treated with nephroureterectomy or partial ureterectomy, and analyzed the expression of the ACTN4 protein and the amplification of ACTN4 using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), respectively. The median follow-up duration was 65 months. Among 168 cases, 49 (29%) showed ACTN4 protein overexpression and 25 (15%) showed copy number gain (≥4 copies per cell) of ACTN4. The copy number gain of ACTN4 detected using FISH significantly correlated with ACTN4 protein overexpression and several adverse clinicopathological factors, including higher pathological T stage, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, positive surgical margin, concomitant subtype histology, and non-papillary gross finding. Cox univariate regression analyses revealed that both copy number gain of ACTN4 and ACTN4 protein overexpression were significant risk factors for extraurothelial recurrence and death (each p < 0.0001), but multivariate analysis revealed that only copy number gain of ACTN4 was an independent risk factor for extraurothelial recurrence and death (p = 0.038 and 0.027, hazard ratio = 2.16 and 2.17, respectively). This is the first study demonstrating the aberrant expression status of ACTN4 in UUTUC and indicating its putative usefulness as a prognostic indicator in patients with UUTUC.

A Urine-based DNA Methylation Marker Test to Detect Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: We explored the accuracy of a urine-based epigenetic test for detecting upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol, urine samples were prospectively collected from primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients before radical nephroureterectomy, ureterectomy, or ureteroscopy between December 2019 and March 2022. Samples were analyzed with Bladder CARE, a urine-based test that measures the methylation levels of 3 cancer biomarkers (TRNA-Cys, SIM2, and NKX1-1) and 2 internal control loci using methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes coupled with quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results were reported as the Bladder CARE Index score and quantitatively categorized as positive (>5), high risk (2.5-5), or negative (<2.5). The findings were compared with those of 1:1 sex/age-matched cancer-free healthy individuals. RESULTS: Fifty patients (40 radical nephroureterectomy, 7 ureterectomy, and 3 ureteroscopy) with a median (IQR) age of 72 (64-79) years were included. Bladder CARE Index results were positive in 47, high risk in 1, and negative in 2 patients. A significant correlation was found between Bladder CARE Index values and tumor size. Urine cytology was available for 35 patients, of whom 22 (63%) results were false-negative. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients had significantly higher Bladder CARE Index values compared to the controls (mean 189.3 vs 1.6, P < .001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Bladder CARE test for detecting upper tract urothelial carcinoma were 96%, 88%, 89%, and 96%, respectively.Conclusions:Bladder CARE is an accurate urine-based epigenetic test for the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, with much higher sensitivity than standard urine cytology.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of HER2, EGFR, and Nectin-4 Expression in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, often discovered at an advanced stage at diagnosis. Nectin-4 is expressed in a broad range of patients with UTUC and is associated with poor progression-free survival. The receptors of the erythroblastosis oncogene B (ErbB) family are potential therapeutic targets for urothelial carcinoma. Herein, we aimed to investigate the relationship of nectin-4 and ErbB family receptors, namely epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in patients with UTUC. Targeted therapies for these receptors could be used in sequence or in combination for increasing treatment efficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed immunohisto-chemical analysis for HER2, EGFR, and nectin-4 using tissue microarrays. A total of 98 UTUC patients were included in the study. We investigated the impact of EGFR and HER2 expression status on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of all patients. RESULTS: The percentages of patients positive for HER2, EGFR, and nectin-4 were 97%, 70%, and 65%, respectively. The co-expression rates of HER2-EGFR, HER2-nectin-4, and EGFR-nectin-4 were 69%, 64%, and 47%, respectively. The number of patients positive for all three receptors was 47%. Higher HER2 levels were significantly associated with worse CSS and RFS. Higher EGFR levels were associated with a worse CSS. CONCLUSION: HER2, EGFR, and nectin-4 were highly expressed in UTUC. Combination of HER2-, EGFR-, and nectin-4-targeted therapy may be an effective option for the treatment of patients with UTUC.

Urinary bladder recurrences following ureteroscopic biopsies of upper tract urothelial cancers: a multi-centre observational study with genomic assessment for clonality.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Urinary bladder recurrences (UBRs) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) are a known challenge in patients with upper-tract urothelial cancers (UTUCs). We aim to assess factors associated with UBR and clonal-relatedness with resected UTUC. METHODS: Patients who underwent RNUx for UTUC between 1998 and 2015 in five institutions were identified. Clonal relatedness between primary UTUC and subsequent UBR in a sub-cohort was assessed using next-generation sequencing. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess differences in UBR between two groups (with or without ureteroscopic biopsy). RESULTS: Of 267 patients with complete records, 73 (27.3%) had UBR during follow-up. The five-year UBR-free survival in all patients was 64.7%. The five-year UBR-free-survival was inferior in patients who underwent URS biopsy compared with patients who did not undergo ureteroscopic biopsy (49.9% vs 76.4%, p < 0.001). History of bladder tumour (HR, 95% CI; 2.94, 1.73-5.00, p < 0.001), ureteroscopic biopsy (HR, 95% CI; 2.21, 1.38-3.53, p = 0.001) and preoperative urine cytology ≥C3 (HR, 95% CI; 2.06, 1.24-3.40, p = 0.005) were independently associated with UBR. Patients with ureteroscopic biopsy (n = 3/5) showed identical mutational changes for common genes (TP53 and FGFR3) between primary UTUC and subsequent UBR. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteroscopic biopsy of UTUC is a significant risk factor for UBR. Qualitative clonality assessment showed identical mutational signatures between primary UTUC and UBR.

ANXA10 Expression Is Inversely Associated with Tumor Stage, Grade, and TP53 Expression in Upper and Lower Urothelial Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common type of malignant disease, but little is known about the diagnostic and prognostic markers of upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) because of its rarity. To clarify the significance of ANXA10 in UTUC, we studied ANXA10 expression with immunohistochemistry (IHC). METHODS: The expression of ANXA10 was analyzed in the upper and lower urinary tract of UC by IHC in combination with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data analysis. The association between ANXA10 expression and representative cancer-related molecules was also evaluated. RESULTS: ANXA10 expression was weak in normal upper tract urothelium but was positive in 39/117 (33%) UTUCs. ANXA10 was more frequently positive in tumors with pure UC (36%, p < 0.05), papillary morphology (50%, p < 0.01), low grade (G1/2: 57%, p < 0.01), and pTa/is/1 stage (55%, p < 0.01) than in those with histological variants (0%), nodular morphology (9%), G3 (16%), and pT2/3/4 (13%), respectively. ANXA10-positive patients showed better cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival than ANXA10-negative patients (p < 0.05). IHC showed that ANXA10 positivity was detected more in cases with the low expression of TP53 (p < 0.01) and Ki-67 labeling index <20% (p < 0.01). In TCGA dataset of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, higher ANXA10 expression correlated with papillary morphology, lower grade/stage, luminal papillary subtype, wild-type TP53, and FGFR3 gene mutation. CONCLUSION: We revealed that ANXA10 expression was increased during carcinogenesis and was observed more frequently in papillary UC of lower grade and stage. However, its expression decreased as cancer progressed. Therefore, the ANXA10 expression in UTUC might be clinically useful for decision-making.

Prevalence and risk estimation of cancer-predisposing genes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Japanese.

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is a rare cancer that has been associated with mismatch repair genes such as MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. In addition, patients with pathogenic variants of cancer-predisposing genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been reported. However, how cancer-predisposing genes affect the risk of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in the Japanese population remains unclear. Thus, we performed a case-control sequencing study of 27 cancer-predisposing genes in 208 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients and 37 727 controls. Only MSH6 and MSH2 were observed with a value of P < 0.05. However, there was no difference in the prevalence of pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2, which does not support the use of a poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitor in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Only mismatch repair genes were associated with patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, but the prevalence of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes was lower than that reported in previous studies from other populations.

Differences in genomic profile of high-grade urothelial carcinoma according to tumor location.

OBJECTIVES: To establish targeted therapies based on the molecular landscape in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), we tried to investigate the molecular characteristics of UTUC compared with those of bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLUC) by next-generation sequencing (NGS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected 71 high-grade infiltrating urothelial carcinoma tissue specimens from 33 UTUC and 38 BLUC patients. NGS analysis was performed with the Illumina TruShigt Oncology-500 panel. RESULTS: Both UTUC and BLUC showed similar clinicopathologic characteristics, as well as morphologic similarities. The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) of all cases was 7.8 mutations/Mb. The majority of alterations were missense mutations. TP53 (40/71, 56.3%), KDM6A (30/71, 42.3%), and TERT promoter mutations (23/71, 32.4%) were observed regardless of tumor location. Compared with UTUC, BLUC showed frequent mutations in several genes: ARID1A (P = 0.001), ASXL1 (P = 0.017), ERBB3 (P = 0.005), PRKDC (P = 0.004) and RB1 (P = 0.041). On the contrary, copy number loss of FGFR3 was observed more in UTUC than BLUC (P = 0.018). Also, 6 cases showed oncogenic fusions: 3 cases with FGFR2 fusion in UTUC and 3 cases with FGFR3-TACC3 fusion in BLUC. CONCLUSION: Despite the small cohort size, we identified genetic differences between UTUC and BLUC in Korean patients by NGS. An understanding of the comprehensive molecular characteristics of UTUC and BLUC may be helpful in detecting candidates for targeted therapy.

Molecular classification and diagnostics of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is one of the common urothelial cancers. Its molecular pathogenesis, however, is poorly understood, with no useful biomarkers available for accurate diagnosis and molecular classification. Through an integrated genetic study involving 199 UTUC samples, we delineate the landscape of genetic alterations in UTUC enabling genetic/molecular classification. According to the mutational status of TP53, MDM2, RAS, and FGFR3, UTUC is classified into five subtypes having discrete profiles of gene expression, tumor location/histology, and clinical outcome, which is largely recapitulated in an independent UTUC cohort. Sequencing of urine sediment-derived DNA has a high diagnostic value for UTUC with 82.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. These results provide a solid basis for better diagnosis and management of UTUC.

Expression Analysis of Same-Patient Metachronous and Synchronous Upper Tract and Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We compared upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) in same-patient metachronous UTUC and synchronous UTUC and BUC using next-generation sequencing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive untreated same-patient samples of UTUC and BUC were macrodissected from unstained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides after quality control. Samples were divided into 4 groups: 1) UTUC-metachronous BUC, 2) BUC-metachronous UTUC, 3) synchronous UTUC-BUC, 4) UTUC without BUC. Exclusions were inadequate clinical data or histological tumor purity <30%. Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing was performed. After quality assessment, gene expression clusters using unsupervised hierarchical consensus clustering and correlation with pertinent clinicopathologic variables, a prior RNASeq data set and other published data were performed. RESULTS: RNAseq was performed on 95 samples (UTUC=61, BUC=34) from 40 untreated patients. Unsupervised consensus clustering segregated the tumors into 2 clusters that were enriched with BASE47 basal-like or luminal-like gene expression. Almost two-thirds (61.9%) of Group 2 tumors were basal-like, while the majority of Groups 1, 3, 4 (80.6%, 70.0% and 69.6%, respectively) were luminal-like (p=0.017). Further analyses revealed that the differences in basal-like and luminal-like gene expression were associated with differential fibroblast and immune cell gene expression signatures. In all, 87.5% of metachronous tumors maintained subtype membership. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression analysis of same-patient metachronous UTUC-BUC suggests that the majority of mUTUC developing after BUC appear more basal-like, while synchronous and initial UTUC tumors appear luminal-like. Metachronous tumors largely maintain molecular subtype membership of the initial tumor regardless of chronologic development or anatomical origin.

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Upper-tract and Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Characterization of the different genomic alterations (GAs) in urothelial carcinoma (UC), by site of origin, may identify contrasting therapeutic opportunities and inform distinct putative pathogenetic mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: To describe the genomic landscape of UC based on the anatomic site of the primary tumor. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 479 upper tract UC (UTUC) and 1984 bladder UC (BUC) patients underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to evaluate all classes of GAs, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Targetable GAs and signatures were assessed according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT). INTERVENTION: Hybrid-capture-based CGP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses and differences between anatomic subgroups were reported. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 39% of patients with UC harbored one or more tier 1-2 GAs, suggesting potential benefit from approved or investigational therapies. UTUC cases were enriched in FGFR3 short variant (SV) GA (20% vs 13%) and HRAS SV GA (7.3% vs 3%), the latter attributed specifically to enrichment in renal pelvis UC (9.5%) versus ureteral UC (1.8%, p=0.002). RB1 GAs were more frequent in BUC than in UTUC (21% vs 7.8% p<0.001). Non-FGFR3 kinase fusions were observed in 1% of patients, including BRAF/RAF1 fusions in 0.5%. BRAF mutations/fusions were observed in 2% of cases and were mutually exclusive with FGFR3 GA (p=0.002). There were no differences of TMB high/MSI high for primary tumor and metastatic sites, but UTUC was enriched for MSI high (3.4%) relative to BUC (0.8%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the genomic landscapes of UTUC and BUC were modest; however, patients with UTUC were enriched for FGFR3 and HRAS SV relative to BUC. Further investigation on UC, stratified by the site of origin, is warranted. In addition, these results suggest an opportunity for the routine incorporation of CGP prior to systemic therapy initiation in metastatic UC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Genomic profiling of advanced urothelial carcinoma can inform several therapeutic opportunities for patients, particularly those with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, an infrequent and generally aggressive tumor entity with nonoverlapping clinical features compared with its bladder counterpart, which is often treated based on the data extrapolated from bladder cancer.

The clonal relation of primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and paired urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

The risk of developing urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) in patients treated by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for an upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is 22% to 47% in the 2 years after surgery. Subject of debate remains whether UTUC and the subsequent UCB are clonally related or represent separate origins. To investigate the clonal relationship between both entities, we performed targeted DNA sequencing of a panel of 41 genes on matched normal and tumor tissue of 15 primary UTUC patients treated by RNU who later developed 19 UCBs. Based on the detected tumor-specific DNA aberrations, the paired UTUC and UCB(s) of 11 patients (73.3%) showed a clonal relation, whereas in four patients the molecular results did not indicate a clear clonal relationship. Our results support the hypothesis that UCBs following a primary surgically resected UTUC are predominantly clonally derived recurrences and not separate entities.

Molecular Characterization of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in the Era of Next-generation Sequencing: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.

CONTEXT: While upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) share histological appearance with bladder cancer (BC), the former has differences in etiology and clinical phenotype consistent with characteristic molecular alterations. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate current genomic sequencing and proteomic data examining molecular alterations in UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed in December 2019 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 46 publications were selected for inclusion in this report, including 13 studies assessing genome-wide alterations, 18 studies assessing gene expression or microRNA expression profiles, three studies assessing proteomics, one study assessing genome-wide DNA methylation, and 14 studies evaluating distinct pathway alteration patterns. Differences between sporadic and hereditary UTUC, and between UTUC and BC, as well as molecular profiles associated with exposure to aristolochic acid are highlighted. Molecular pathways relevant to UTUC biology, such as alterations in FGFR3, TP53, or microsatellite instability, are discussed. Our findings are limited by tumor and patient heterogeneity and different platforms used in the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular events in UTUC and BC can be shared or distinct. Consequently, molecular subtypes differ according to location. Further work is needed to define the epigenomic and proteomic features of UTUC, and understand the mechanisms by which they shape the clinical behavior of UTUC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We report the current data on the molecular alterations specific to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), resulting from novel genomic and proteomic technologies. Although UTUC biology is comparable with that of bladder cancer, the rates and UTUC-enriched alterations support its uniqueness and the need for precision medicine strategies for this rare tumor type.

Use of the Nuclear Matrix Protein 22 BladderChek Test for the Detection of Primary and Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test in urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1318 patients who performed the NMP22 BladderChek tests. Of them, 103 were primary UC patients, 90 were surgical treatment UC patients, and 1125 were benign disease patients. The performance of the NMP22 BladderChek test for the diagnosis of primary and recurrent UC was evaluated. Moreover, the performance of urine cytology and the NMP22 BladderChek test for the diagnosis of primary UC was compared in 90 available subjects including 48 primary UC patients and 42 benign disease patients. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 37.9% and 95.8%, respectively, for the diagnosis of primary UC (n = 1228). The corresponding parameters of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 31.0% and 88.5%, respectively, for the diagnosis of recurrent UC (n = 90). The sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology were 54.2% and 97.6%, respectively, for the diagnosis of primary UC (n = 90); the corresponding parameters of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 41.7% and 83.3%, respectively; the corresponding parameters of the two tests combination were 64.6% and 83.3%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the performance between the NMP22 BladderChek test and urine cytology or the combination of two tests (P = 0.017 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The NMP22 BladderChek test has a low sensitivity for detecting primary and recurrent UC. Urine cytology is superior to the NMP22 BladderChek test, and combined use of the two tests improves the sensitivity in the detection of primary UC.

Synchronous and metachronous urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and the bladder: Are they clonally related? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Following radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), intravesical recurrence (IVR) is found in 22% to 47% of patients. Patients with a primary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) have an increased risk of a future UTUC (1%-5%). Paired UTUC and UCB might represent clonally related tumors due to intraluminal seeding of tumor cells or might be separate entities of urothelial carcinoma caused by field cancerization. We systematically reviewed all the relevant literature to address the possible clonal relation of UTUC and paired UCB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases were systematically searched for relevant citations published between January 2000 and July 2019. This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Of 5038 citations identified, 86 full papers were screened, and 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The populations studied and the molecular techniques used to assess clonality of UTUC and paired UCB differed largely over time. Eight studies reported on primary UTUC and meta- or synchronous IVR without a history of UCB. A total of 118 tumors (55 UTUC and 63 IVR) from 49 patients were included, of which 94% seemed to be clonally related. Five studies reported on primary UCB and subsequent UTUC with a total of 61 tumors (30 UCB and 31 UTUC) from 14 patients; a possible clonal origin was identified for 85% of the tumors. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the limitations of microsatellite technology in comparison to Next Generation Sequencing and currently accepted concepts of tumor heterogeneity and evolution, this systematic review shows that most, if not all, UTUC and paired UCB likely are clonally related.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma has a luminal-papillary T-cell depleted contexture and activated FGFR3 signaling.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is characterized by a distinctly aggressive clinical phenotype. To define the biological features driving this phenotype, we performed an integrated analysis of whole-exome and RNA sequencing of UTUC. Here we report several key insights from our molecular dissection of this disease: 1) Most UTUCs are luminal-papillary; 2) UTUC has a T-cell depleted immune contexture; 3) High FGFR3 expression is enriched in UTUC and correlates with its T-cell depleted immune microenvironment; 4) Sporadic UTUC is characterized by a lower total mutational burden than urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Our findings lay the foundation for a deeper understanding of UTUC biology and provide a rationale for the development of UTUC-specific treatment strategies.

High expression of Chitinase 3-like-1 is an unfavorable prognostic factor in urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract and urinary bladder.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic adaptation in cancer cells is important for cancer cell survival. Alternation in cellular metabolism getting more energy to support cell proliferation played a critical role in disease progression. We initially analyzed the public transcriptome of urothelial carcinoma in Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE31684) with particular focus on genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism, and found that Chitinase 3-like-1 (CHI3L1) was a significantly up-regulated gene associated with advanced disease status. This study was aimed to evaluate the expression and prognostic significance of CHI3L1 in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma (UBUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed immunohistochemical study to evaluate CHI3L1 expression in 2 well-defined cohorts of urothelial carcinoma, including UTUC (n = 340) and UBUC (n = 295). CHI3L1 expression level was determined by H-score method. The associations between CHI3L1 expression and clinicopathological features, disease-specific survival (DSS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: High expression of CHI3L1 was significantly associated with adverse clinicopathological features in UTUC or UBUC, including advanced tumor status (pT), nodal metastasis, high histological grade, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and high mitotic activity (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with high CHI3L1 expression had shorter DSS and MFS in both UTUC and UBUC (all P < 0.05). In multivariate survival analyses, high expression of CHI3L1 acted as an independent prognostic factor for worse DSS (P < 0.001 in UTUC and P = 0.036 in UBUC) and MFS (P = 0.002 in UTUC and P = 0.003 in UBUC) in both UTUC and UBUC groups. CONCLUSIONS: High expression of CHI3L1 was significantly associated with aggressive clinicopathological features and acted as an independent prognostic factor for worse outcome in urothelial carcinoma.