Treatment, survival, and costs of laryngeal cancer care in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine associations between treatment and volume with survival and costs in elderly patients with laryngeal squamous cell cancer (SCCA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. METHODS: We evaluated 2,370 patients diagnosed with laryngeal SCCA from 2004 to 2007 using cross-tabulations, multivariate logistic and generalized linear regression modeling, and survival analysis. RESULTS: Chemoradiation was significantly associated with supraglottic tumors (relative risk ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-4.0), additional cancer-directed treatment (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.7), and a reduced likelihood of surgical salvage (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2-0.6). Surgery with postoperative radiation was associated with significantly improved survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6-0.9), after controlling for patient and tumor variables including salvage. High-volume care was not associated with survival for nonoperative treatment but was associated with improved survival (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.8) among surgical patients. Initial treatment and 5-year overall costs for chemoradiation were higher than for all other treatment categories. High-volume care was associated with significantly lower costs of care for surgical patients but was not associated with differences in costs of care for nonoperative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoradiation in elderly patients with laryngeal cancer was associated with increased costs, additional cancer-directed treatment, and a reduced likelihood of surgical salvage. Surgery with postoperative radiation was associated with improved survival in this cohort, and high-volume hospital surgical care was associated with improved survival and lower costs. These findings have implications for improving the quality of laryngeal cancer treatment at a time of both rapid growth in the elderly population and diminishing healthcare resources.

Quality indicators of laryngeal cancer care in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine associations between quality of care, survival, and costs in elderly patients treated for laryngeal squamous cell cancer (SCCA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare data. METHODS: We evaluated 2,370 patients diagnosed with laryngeal SCCA from 2004 to 2007 using multivariate regression and survival analysis. Using quality indicators derived from guidelines for recommended care, summary measures of quality were calculated for diagnosis, initial treatment, surveillance, treatment of recurrence, end-of-life care, performance, and an overall summary measure of quality. RESULTS: High-quality care was associated with significant differences in survival for diagnosis [HR = 0.80, 95% CI (0.66-0.97)], initial treatment [HR = 0.75 (0.63-0.88)], surveillance [HR = 0.54 (0.44-0.66)], treatment of recurrence [HR = 1.54 (1.26-1.89)], end-of-life care [HR = 0.69 (0.52-0.92)], performance [HR = 0.41 (0.33-0.52)], and an overall summary measure of quality [HR = 0.66 (0.54-0.80)], which was significantly associated with lower mean incremental costs [-$24,958 (-$35,873 - -$14,042)]. There was a significant survival advantage for initial treatment with surgery and postoperative radiation [HR = 0.66 (0.53-0.82)] and high-volume surgical care [HR = 0.64 (0.43-0.96)] after controlling for all other variables, including quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality larynx cancer care in elderly patients was associated with improved survival and reduced costs; however, high-quality care for treatment of recurrence was associated with poorer survival. These data suggest that survival outcomes in elderly patients with laryngeal cancer are not entirely explained by differences in the receipt of quality care using existing treatment and performance quality indicators and also suggest a need to develop sensitive and valid quality indicators of larynx cancer care in this population.

Economic burden of resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in a US managed-care population.

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) places a high burden on society and poses complex challenges to healthcare providers. METHODS: Retrospective claims-based analysis of commercially insured patients identified between 01-31-04 and 12-31-07 with diagnostic evidence of cancer of the lip, tongue, oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx who underwent surgical resection during identification period. Outcomes included treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and costs. All study variables were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Among the 1104 patients in the final study sample, 71.9% were male, with mean age 56.6 years. On average, patients were followed for 830 days (range of mean days: 805 for lip or tongue cancer to 847 for pharyngeal cancer). About half received radiation therapy during follow-up, whereas only 16.2% received chemotherapy. Patients with pharyngeal cancer were most likely to undergo chemotherapy. After their index surgery, 57.9% of patients had ≥1 inpatient stay, 44.9% had ≥1 ER visit, and all had ≥1 ambulatory visit. The percentage with ≥1 inpatient stay post-index was highest among patients with pharyngeal cancer (73.0%) and lowest in the laryngeal cancer cohort (49.5%). Mean number of hospitalized days, ER visits, and ambulatory visits was 0.45, 0.69, and 27.4, respectively, per-patient per-year. Overall, patients incurred ~$94 million in cost following index surgery ($85,000 per-person, on average). Mean total healthcare cost was $34,450 per-patient per-year, the bulk of which comprised medical expenses ($32,401). The highest mean healthcare cost was incurred by the pharyngeal cancer cohort ($40,214). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with resected SCCHN incur substantial healthcare costs and have high utilization rates. Results of this analysis are primarily applicable to resected SCCHN in a managed-care setting, and therefore may not be generalizable to the entire US population. Furthermore, disease stage is an important factor impacting outcomes, but these analyses did not stratify patients according to disease stage.

Cetuximab plus radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into the clinical and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab plus radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN) considered inappropriate for chemoradiotherapy but appropriate for radiotherapy, based upon the evidence submission from Merck Pharmaceuticals to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal (STA) process. The manufacturer's submission was generally of good quality and was an accurate representation of the original reference data. One good-quality randomised controlled trial comparing radiotherapy plus cetuximab with radiotherapy alone in patients with stage III or IV non-metastatic LA SCCHN was included, demonstrating that the duration of locoregional control was significantly longer with radiotherapy plus cetuximab than with radiotherapy alone; also, overall and progression-free survival were significantly longer and the overall response rate was significantly better with the combination therapy. Cetuximab did not exacerbate the common toxic effects associated with radiotherapy of the head and neck. No supporting evidence for these findings are available. The patient population in the trial included a high proportion of patients who would be expected to be suitable for chemoradiotherapy and therefore does not match the population described in the submission's decision problem. Also, the radiotherapy regimens used in the trial are not typical of current UK practice. The ERG considered the manufacturer's economic evaluation to comprise the only relevant evidence to consider for the purposes of this STA. The economic model was considered appropriate for the decision problem. The results suggested that cetuximab plus radiotherapy was cost-effective compared with radiotherapy alone under a broad range of different assumptions on the basis of a cost-effectiveness threshold of 20,000 pounds. In the base case the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of cetuximab plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with LA SCCHN was 6390 pounds per additional QALY. Simple sensitivity analyses to examine the robustness of the results were undertaken, suggesting that areas of uncertainty that emerged in the modelling are unlikely to have a material effect on the conclusions. The guidance issued by NICE in May 2007 as a result of the STA states that cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy is not recommended for patients with LA SCCHN.

Cost-effectiveness of dual-head 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for the detection of recurrent laryngeal cancer.

The study is based upon 80 patients, suspected of having recurrent laryngeal cancer, who underwent an 18F-FDG PET study on a coincidence camera and a laryngoscopic biopsy under general anaesthesia. The potential value of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of local relapses of laryngeal cancer after radiotherapy by use of a coincidence camera was prospectively assessed, and a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed retrospectively. The effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET is reflected in sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) using comparison with the biopsy results as a gold standard. In case of a negative biopsy result, follow-up was continued for a minimum of one year. The results showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 85%, a PPV of 87%, and a NPV of 100%. Costs per patient of a 18F-FDG PET scan were 682 euro, whereas the saved costs by reducing CT-scans and panendoscopies were 618 euro. In this scenario implementation of 18F-FDG PET scintigraphy in the detection of recurrent laryngeal cancer has additional costs of 64 euro per patient. However, panendoscopy related complications, and potential improvement in quality of life due to early detection of recurrent disease were not taken into account in this study. In conclusion, the technical efficacy of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of recurrent laryngeal cancer is high. 18F-FDG PET is more accurate than CT, and in addition the cost-effectiveness ratio of 18F-FDG PET lies within an acceptable range and has further improvement potential when a quality of life factor is included in a prospective cost-effectiveness analysis.

Laryngeal cancer: quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: The need to account for the cost of care is being imposed on clinicians by the corporate purchasers of health care. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for laryngeal cancer should be based on measurable and relevant clinical outcomes. Quality-of-life (QL) is a very important outcome, especially if survival is similar between two treatments. METHODS: Using QL data gathered prospectively from a group of 46 patients with glottic cancer, the effects of radiotherapy (RT) are compared with those of surgery (total laryngectomy). RESULTS: Surgery results in greater measurable dysfunction, especially of speech, but with respect to psychological functioning and general well-being, there are no major QL differences between patients treated surgically and those receiving RT. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effectiveness of surgery, from the perspective of patient-based QL outcome, is very similar to that for RT in advanced cancer of the larynx. Each center needs to carefully consider its outcomes and overall average costs per patient before deciding which treatment regimen is to be preferred. These results have implications for the organ-sparing regimens in the treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer.