Prospective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated proton therapy for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma: the PRONTO study rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Oncologic surgical resection is the standard of care for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS), often accompanied by the addition of pre- or postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT may decrease the risk of joint stiffness and fibrosis at the cost of higher rates of wound complications. Hypofractionated, preoperative RT has been shown to provide acceptable outcomes in prospective trials. Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides the means to decrease dose to surrounding organs at risk, such as the skin, bone, soft tissues, and adjacent joint(s), and has not yet been studied in patients with extremity and truncal sarcoma. METHODS: Our study titled "PROspective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated protoN therapy for extremity and Truncal soft tissue sarcOma (PRONTO)" is a non-randomized, prospective phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative, hypofractionated PBT for patients with STS of the extremity and trunk planned for surgical resection. Adult patients with Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status ≤ 2 with resectable extremity and truncal STS will be included, with the aim to accrue 40 patients. Treatment will consist of 30 Gy radiobiological equivalent of PBT in 5 fractions delivered every other day, followed by surgical resection 2-12 weeks later. The primary outcome is rate of major wound complications as defined according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada Sarcoma2 (NCIC-SR2) Multicenter Trial. Secondary objectives include rate of late grade ≥ 2 toxicity, local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival at 1- and 2-years, functional outcomes, quality of life, and pathologic response. DISCUSSION: PRONTO represents the first trial evaluating the use of hypofractionated PBT for STS. We aim to prove the safety and efficacy of this approach and to compare our results to historical outcomes established by previous trials. Given the low number of proton centers and limited availability, the short course of PBT may provide the opportunity to treat patients who would otherwise be limited when treating with daily RT over several weeks. We hope that this trial will lead to increased referral patterns, offer benefits towards patient convenience and clinic workflow efficiency, and provide evidence supporting the use of PBT in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05917301 (registered 23/6/2023).

Impact of resection margin on outcome in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities treated with limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The standard curative treatments for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) include surgical resection with negative margins and perioperative radiotherapy. However, the optimal resection margin remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes in ESTS between microscopically positive margin (R1) and microscopically negative margin (R0) according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) (R + 1 mm) classification. METHODS: Medical records of patients with localized ESTS who underwent primary limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed for at least 5 years or till local or distant recurrence was diagnosed during follow-up. Outcomes were local and distal recurrences and survival. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included in this study, in which 17 underwent R0 resection and 35 underwent R1 resection. No significant differences were observed in rates of local recurrence (11.4% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.062) or distant recurrence (40.0% vs. 41.18%, p = 0.935) between R0 and R1 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that distant recurrences was associated with a Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) grade (Grade III vs. I, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 12.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.67-58.88, p = 0.001) and tumor location (lower vs. upper extremity, aHR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.7, p = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier plots showed no significant differences in local (p = 0.444) or distant recurrent-free survival (p = 0.161) between R0 and R1 groups. CONCLUSIONS: R1 margins, when complemented by radiotherapy, did not significantly alter outcomes of ESTS as R0 margins. Further studies with more histopathological types and larger cohorts are necessary to highlight the path forward.

Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Risk Assessment and Multidisciplinary Management.

Extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare cancers that arise from mesenchymal tissues. Hence, the adoption of tailored risk assessment and prognostication tools plays a crucial role in optimizing the decision-making for which of the many possible treatment strategies to select. Management of these tumors requires a multidisciplinary strategy, which has seen significant development in recent decades. Surgery has emerged as the primary treatment approach, with the main goal of achieving microscopic negative tumor margins. To reduce the likelihood of local recurrence, loco-regional treatments such as radiation therapy and isolated limb perfusion are often added to the treatment regimen in combination with surgery. This approach also enables surgeons to perform limb-sparing surgery, particularly in cases where a positive tumor margin is expected. Chemotherapy may also provide a further benefit in decreasing the probability of local recurrence or reducing distant metastasis in selected patients. Selecting the optimal treatment strategy for these rare tumors is best accomplished by an experienced multi-disciplinary team.

The role of 18F-FDG PET in minimizing variability in gross tumor volume delineation of soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Accurate gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation is a critical step in radiation therapy treatment planning. However, it is reader dependent and thus susceptible to intra- and inter-reader variability. GTV delineation of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) often relies on CT and MR images. PURPOSE: This study investigates the potential role of 18F-FDG PET in reducing intra- and inter-reader variability thereby improving reproducibility of GTV delineation in STS, without incurring additional costs or radiation exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three readers performed independent GTV delineation of 61 patients with STS using first CT and MR followed by CT, MR, and 18F-FDG PET images. Each reader performed a total of six delineation trials, three trials per imaging modality group. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to assess both intra- and inter-reader variability using generated simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) GTVs as ground truth. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon signed-ranked test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in both intra- and inter-reader variability in GTV delineation using CT, MR 18F-FDG PET images vs. CT and MR images. This was translated by an increase in the DSC score and a decrease in the HD for GTVs drawn from CT, MR and 18F-FDG PET images vs. GTVs drawn from CT and MR for all readers and across all three trials. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of 18F-FDG PET into CT and MR images decreased intra- and inter-reader variability and subsequently increased reproducibility of GTV delineation in STS.

Radiotherapy versus limb-sparing surgery alone in low-grade soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremity and trunk wall: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Current guidelines recommend the use of radiotherapy in the management of intermediate and high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremity and trunk wall. Its use in low-grade sarcoma is less clear. To date there have been no pooled data analyses regarding its role in this context. Its use is not without complications and therefore must be justified. We aim to assess the oncological impact of radiotherapy versus limb-sparing surgery alone in this subset of sarcoma. Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane's databases were searched from 1982 to present. Studies on or having a subgroup analysis of low-grade soft tissue sarcoma, with a radiotherapy and a surgery only arm were included. Outcomes included local recurrence and overall survival. Patients were at least 16 years of age with primary de-novo sarcoma who had not undergone prior resection or treatment. Those undergoing concomitant therapy were excluded. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Results were pooled using a random-effects model and presented as a forest plot. Primary outcome measures included local recurrence and overall survival. Eleven unique studies were included, consisting of two RCTs and nine non-randomized studies. Overall, there were 12 799 patients. Four studies were included in meta-analysis and the overall pooled effect showed a limited role of radiotherapy in overall survival outcomes when compared to limb-sparing surgery alone HR 1.00 [0.83-1.20] P = 0.41. Descriptive analysis suggests there is limited role of radiotherapy in improving local recurrence outcomes. This study suggests there is limited role for radiotherapy versus limb-sparing surgery alone in low-grade soft-tissue sarcoma. These findings strongly suggest there is lack of high-quality data and that further research must be undertaken prior to forming any strong conclusions regarding the management of low-grade soft-tissue sarcoma. Demonstrating a role for radiotherapy may help improve the quality of excisional margins and thus potentiate limb-sparing surgery.

Moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy and pathologic response for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of limbs and trunk: experience from a tertiary cancer center

Background Preoperative radiation therapy following by limb-sparing or conservative surgery is a standard approach for limb and trunk STS. Data supporting hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules are scarce albeit biological sensitivity of STS to radiation would justify it. We sought to evaluate the impact of moderate hypofractionation on pathologic response and its influence on oncologic outcomes. Material and methods From October 2018 to January 2023, 18 patients with limb or trunk STS underwent preoperative radiotherapy at a median dose of 52.5 Gy (range 49.5–60 Gy) in 15 fractions of 3.5 Gy (3.3-4 Gy) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A favorable pathologic response (fPR) was considered as ≥ 90% tumor necrosis on specimen examination. Results All patients completed planned preoperative radiotherapy. Eleven patients (61.1%) achieved a fPR, and 7 patients (36.8%) a complete pathologic response with total disappearance of tumor cells. Nine patients (47%) developed grade 1–2 acute skin toxicity, and 7 patients (38.8%) had wound complications on follow-up. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1–40), no cases of local relapse were observed, and actuarial 3-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) are 87% and 76.4%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the presence of a favorable pathologic response (fPR) was associated with improved 3-year OS (100% vs. 56.03%, p = 0.058) and 3-year DMFS (86.91% vs. 31.46%, p = 0.002). Moreover, both complete or partial RECIST response and radiological stabilization of the tumor lesion showed a significant association with higher rates of 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (83% vs. 83% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (100% vs. 80% vs. 0, p = 0.002) (AU)

Moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy and pathologic response for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of limbs and trunk: experience from a tertiary cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiation therapy following by limb-sparing or conservative surgery is a standard approach for limb and trunk STS. Data supporting hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules are scarce albeit biological sensitivity of STS to radiation would justify it. We sought to evaluate the impact of moderate hypofractionation on pathologic response and its influence on oncologic outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 2018 to January 2023, 18 patients with limb or trunk STS underwent preoperative radiotherapy at a median dose of 52.5 Gy (range 49.5-60 Gy) in 15 fractions of 3.5 Gy (3.3-4 Gy) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A favorable pathologic response (fPR) was considered as ≥ 90% tumor necrosis on specimen examination. RESULTS: All patients completed planned preoperative radiotherapy. Eleven patients (61.1%) achieved a fPR, and 7 patients (36.8%) a complete pathologic response with total disappearance of tumor cells. Nine patients (47%) developed grade 1-2 acute skin toxicity, and 7 patients (38.8%) had wound complications on follow-up. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-40), no cases of local relapse were observed, and actuarial 3-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) are 87% and 76.4%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the presence of a favorable pathologic response (fPR) was associated with improved 3-year OS (100% vs. 56.03%, p = 0.058) and 3-year DMFS (86.91% vs. 31.46%, p = 0.002). Moreover, both complete or partial RECIST response and radiological stabilization of the tumor lesion showed a significant association with higher rates of 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (83% vs. 83% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (100% vs. 80% vs. 0, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative moderate hypofractionated radiation treatment for STS is feasible and well tolerated and associates encouraging rates of pathologic response that could have a favorable impact on final outcomes.

SABR for Sarcoma Lung Metastases: Indications for Treatment and Guidance for Patient Selection.

PURPOSE: The lungs are the most common site of metastasis for patients with soft tissue sarcoma. SABR is commonly employed to treat lung metastases among select patients with sarcoma with limited disease burden. We sought to evaluate outcomes and patterns of failure among patients with sarcoma treated with SABR for their lung metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated at a tertiary cancer center between 2006 and 2020. Patient disease status at the time of SABR was categorized as either oligorecurrent or oligoprogressive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease outcomes. Uni- and multivariable analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We identified 70 patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated with SABR to 98 metastatic lung lesions. Local recurrence-free survival after SABR treatment was 83% at 2 years. On univariable analysis, receipt of comprehensive SABR to all sites of pulmonary metastatic disease at the time of treatment was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.51 [0.29-0.88]; P = .02). On multivariable analysis, only having systemic disease controlled at the time of SABR predicted improved PFS (median PFS, 14 vs 4 months; HR, 0.37 [0.20-0.69]; P = .002) and overall survival (median overall survival, 51 vs 14 months; HR, 0.17 [0.08-0.35]; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: SABR provides durable long-term local control for sarcoma lung metastases. The most important predictor for improved outcomes was systemic disease control. Careful consideration of these factors should help guide decisions in a multidisciplinary setting to appropriately select the optimal candidates for SABR.

Preoperative radiation therapy increases adherence in patients with high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Surgery and radiation therapy remain the standard of care for patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma that are >5 cm. Radiation therapy is time and labor-intensive for patients, and social determinants of health may affect adherence. The aim of this study was to define demographic, clinical, and treatment factors associated with the completion of radiation therapy and determine if preoperative radiation therapy improved adherence compared to postoperative radiation therapy. METHODS: The cohort included patients in the National Cancer Database with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma >5 cm without nodal or distant metastases who received limb-sparing surgery and radiation therapy with microscopically negative R0 margins. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with radiation therapy sequencing and adherence (defined as completion of 50 Gy preoperative radiation therapy or at least 60 Gy postoperative radiation therapy). A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model assessed overall survival. RESULTS: Among 2,145 patients, 47.1% received preoperative radiation therapy (n = 1,010), and 52.9% (n = 1135) received postoperative radiation therapy. A greater proportion of patients treated with preoperative (77.2%) versus postoperative radiation therapy (64.9%, P < .0001) received the recommended dose. More patients with private insurance (49.8% vs 35.3% Medicaid vs 44.9% Medicare, P = .011) and patients treated at an academic medical center (52.6% vs 47.4%, P < .001) received preoperative radiation therapy. Patients who received preoperative radiation therapy had lower odds of receiving insufficient doses of radiation therapy (odds ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.27-0.47]). Neither radiation therapy adherence nor sequencing were independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received preoperative radiation therapy were more likely to complete therapy and receive an optimal dose than patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy. Preoperative radiation therapy improves adherence and should be widely considered in patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma, particularly in patients at risk for not completing therapy.

Management of tumor volume changes during preoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma: a new strategy of adaptive radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Using adaptive radiotherapy (ART), to determine objective clinical criteria that identify extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) patients requiring adaptation of their preoperative radiotherapy (RT) plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 17 patients with a lower extremity ESTS treated between 2019 and 2021 with preoperative RT, using helicoidal intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) tomotherapy, before surgical resection. We collected clinical, tumor parameters and treatment data. Repositioning was ascertained by daily Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) imaging. Using the PreciseART technology we retrospectively manually delineated at least one MVCT for each patient per week and recorded volume and dosimetric parameters. A greater than 5% change between target volume and planned target volume (PTV) dosimetric coverage from the initial planning CT scan to at least one MVCT was defined as clinically significant. RESULTS: All 17 patients experienced significant tumor volume changes during treatment; 7 tumors grew (41%) and 10 shrank (59%). Three patients (18%), all undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS) with increased volume changes, experienced significant reductions in tumor dose coverage. Seven patients required a plan adaptation, as determined by practical criteria applied in our departmental practice. Among these patients, only one ultimately experienced a significant change in PTV coverage. Three patients had a PTV decrease of coverage. Among them, 2 did not receive plan adaptation according our criteria. None of the patients with decreased tumor volumes had reduced target volume coverage. Monitoring volume variations by estimating gross tumor volume (GTV) on MVCT, in addition to axial and sagittal linear tumor dimensions, appeared to be most effective for detecting reductions in PTV coverage throughout treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in ESTS volume are evident during preoperative RT, but significant dosimetric variations are rare. Specific attention should be paid to grade 2-3 UPSs during the first 2 weeks of treatment. In the absence of dedicated software in routine clinical practice, monitoring of tumor volume changes by estimating GTV may represent a useful strategy for identifying patients whose treatment needs to be replanned.

Toll-Like Receptor 4 Agonist Injection With Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Phase 1 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) have limited systemic therapy options, and immunomodulation has not yet meaningfully improved outcomes. Intratumoral (IT) injection of the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist glycopyranosyl lipid A in stable-emulsion formulation (GLA-SE) has been studied as immunotherapy in other contexts. Objective: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and immunomodulatory effects of IT GLA-SE with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with metastatic STS with injectable lesions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 1 nonrandomized controlled trial of patients with STS was performed at a single academic sarcoma specialty center from November 17, 2014, to March 16, 2016. Data analysis was performed from August 2016 to September 2022. Interventions: Two doses of IT GLA-SE (5 µg and 10 µg for 8 weekly doses) were tested for safety in combination with concurrent radiotherapy of the injected lesion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were safety and tolerability. Secondary and exploratory end points included local response rates as well as measurement of antitumor immunity with immunohistochemistry and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing of tumor-infiltrating and circulating lymphocytes. Results: Twelve patients (median [range] age, 65 [34-78] years; 8 [67%] female) were treated across the 2 dose cohorts. Intratumoral GLA-SE was well tolerated, with only 1 patient (8%) experiencing a grade 2 adverse event. All patients achieved local control of the injected lesion after 8 doses, with 1 patient having complete regression (mean regression, -25%; range, -100% to 4%). In patients with durable local response, there were detectable increases in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In 1 patient (target lesion -39% at 259 days of follow-up), TCR sequencing revealed expansion of preexisting and de novo clonotypes, with convergence of numerous rearrangements coding for the same binding sequence (suggestive of clonal convergence to antitumor targets). Single-cell sequencing identified these same expanded TCR clones in peripheral blood after treatment; these T cells had markedly enhanced Tbet expression, suggesting TH1 phenotype. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial, IT GLA-SE with concurrent radiotherapy was well tolerated and provided more durable local control than radiotherapy alone. Patients with durable local response demonstrated enhanced IT T-cell clonal expansion, with matched expansion of these clonotypes in the circulation. Additional studies evaluating synergism of IT GLA-SE and radiotherapy with systemic immune modulation are warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02180698.

[Predictive factors assessment of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy of soft tissue sarcomas]. / Évaluation de facteurs prédictifs de réponse pathologique à la radiothérapie néoadjuvante des sarcomes des tissus mous.

PURPOSE: Conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy in presence of local recurrence risk factors is standard treatment of soft tissue sarcomas, a group of rare and heterogeneous tumours. Radiotherapy is performed before or after surgery. In neoadjuvant setting, late radiation-induced toxicity is reduced and pathological response to radiotherapy could be achieved. A complete pathological response to radiotherapy has recently been shown to predict better survival. Our study aims at identifying predictive factors of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy (clinical, radiological or histological) of soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical, imaging (MRI: perilesional oedema, necrosis, tumour heterogeneity, vasculonervous relationships) and pathological (pathological subtype, tumour grade, anticipated/obtained resection quality) data were retrospectively collected. Tumour response (imaging and pathological), patient outcome, acute and late radiation-induced toxicity, predictive factors of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy were studied. The 2-test or exact-Fisher test (qualitative variables) and by Student's t-test or Kruskal-Wallis test (quantitative variables) were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: From April 2017 to April 2021, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (50Gy in 25 fractions) followed by surgical excision was performed to 36 consecutive patients with liposarcomas (n=17/36), or undifferentiated sarcomas (n=8/36). MRI response was complete in 1 patient, partial in 9 patients (n=9/36, 25%), stable in 21 patients (n=21/36, 58%) or in progression in 5 patients (n=5/36, 14%). Pathological response was observed in 22 patients (61%). No grade 3-4 acute radiation-induced toxicity was observed. Regarding late toxicity, 28% of patients had grade 1-2 oedema (n=10/36), 39% had a grade 1 fibrosis (n=14/36), and 30% grade 1 pain (n=11/36). No predictive factors of response to radiotherapy was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is well-tolerated. No clinical, radiological or pathological predictive factors was identified for radiotherapy tumour response.

The incidence, risk factors and outcomes of wound complications after preoperative radiotherapy and surgery for high grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas: A 14-year retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the wound complication (WC) rate and to determine the risk factors for WC in patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated with preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgical resection. METHODS: Using the database of Oxford University Hospital (OUH) we retrospectively studied 126 cases of soft tissue sarcomas treated with preoperative radiotherapy and surgery between 2007 and 2021. WC were defined as minor wound complication (MiWC) not requiring surgical intervention or major wound complication (MaWC) if they received a secondary surgical intervention. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed using frequency of WC and MaWC as a dependent variable. RESULTS: The incidence of WC and MaWC was 43.7% (55/126) and 19% (24/126). Age (OR:1.03, 95%CI: 1.00-1.06, p = 0.016), tumor size (OR:1.11, 95%CI:1.01-1.21, p = 0.027) and tumor site namely proximal lower limb vs upper limb (OR:10.87, 95%CI 1.15-103.03, p = 0.038) were risk factors on multivariate analysis. In nested case control analysis, the incidence of MaWC was 43.6% (24/55), the mean recovery time is 143 days in patients with MaWC. Smoking increases the risk for MaWC (OR:8.32, 95%CI:1.36-49.99, p = 0.022). The time interval between surgery and wound complication reduces the risk for MaWC (OR:0.91, 95%CI:0.84-0.99, p = 0.028) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Age, tumor site and size are risk factors for WC requiring preoperative radiotherapy. Smoking and the time interval between surgery and wound complication are risk factors for MaWC as compared with MiWC. MaWC rate (19%) are comparable to those in postoperative radiotherapy and surgery alone.

Radiotherapy for pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: a comprehensive review.

BACKGROUND: For children with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas, a risk-adapted treatment approach is generally used in order to minimize treatment-related morbidity and mortality in low-risk patients and maximize the benefit in high-risk patients. Our aim in this review is to discuss the prognostic factors, riskadapted treatment options and the details of radiotherapy. METHODS: The publications reached by searching the keywords `pediatric soft tissue sarcoma`, `nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS)`, and `radiotherapy` in Pubmed database were evaluated in detail. RESULTS: Today, based on prospective COG-ARST0332 and EpSSG studies, a risk-adapted multimodal treatment approach has become the standard in pediatric NRSTS. According to them, adjuvant chemotherapy/ radiotherapy can be safely omitted in low-risk patients, while adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy or both are recommended in intermediate and high-risk groups. Recent prospective studies for pediatric patients have reported excellent treatment outcomes with smaller radiotherapy fields and lower doses than adult series. The primary goal of surgery is maximal tumor resection with negative margins. In cases that are initially unresectable, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: A risk-adapted multimodal treatment approach is the standard in pediatric NRSTS . Surgery alone is sufficient in low-risk patients, and adjuvant therapies may safely be omitted. On the contrary, in intermediateand high-risk patients, adjuvant treatments should be applied to reduce recurrence rates. In unresectable patients, the chance of surgery increases with the neoadjuvant treatment approach and thus treatment results may improve. In the future, outcome might be improved with further clarification of molecular features and targeted therapies in such patients.

CivaSheet® use for soft tissue sarcoma: A single institution experience.

OBJECTIVE: CivaSheet is a palladium-103, implantable, intraoperative radiation therapy device which emits unidirectional radiation that enables boost doses in patients who have otherwise received the maximum radiation dose. Here, we present our initial clinical experience with the first 10 cases using this new technology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective chart review of all patients with STS treated with surgical resection and CivaSheet placement at the University of Miami Hospital, a tertiary care center, from January 2018 to December 2019, was performed. Adjuvant radiation was administered by a palladium-103 implant, which delivered an average of 47 Gy (35-55) to a depth of 5 mm. RESULTS: Nine patients underwent CivaSheet placement from January 2018 until December 2019 for a total of 10 CivaSheets placed (1 patient had 2 CivaSheets inserted) and followed for a mean of 27 months (4-45 months). Four tumors were located in the retroperitoneum, two in the chest, two in the groin, and two within the lower extremity. At the time of tumor resection and CivaSheet placement, tumor sizes ranged from 2.5 cm to 13.8 cm with an average of 7.6 cm. Four patients necessitated musculocutaneous tissue flaps for closure and reconstruction. All patients with Grade 4 complications had flap reconstruction and prior radiation. Four patients' tumors recurred locally for a local recurrence rate of 40%. Three patients had modified accordion Grade 4 complications necessitating additional surgery for CivaSheet removal. Extremity tumors unanimously developed modified accordion Grade 4 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: CivaSheet may be an acceptable alternative treatment modality compared to prior brachytherapy methods.

Brachytherapy for Organ and Function Preservation in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas in Adult and Paediatric Patients.

Adjuvant radiotherapy is an integral component in the management of soft-tissue sarcomas. Brachytherapy is a very convenient and conformal way of delivering adjuvant radiotherapy in such tumours, which spares the surrounding normal tissue. Randomised studies have established the efficacy of brachytherapy in the adjuvant setting, with a 5-year local control of 80-85%. High dose rate, low dose rate and pulsed dose rate have shown equivalent local control, but high dose rate has gained popularity owing to patient convenience, radiation safety and flexibility in dose optimisation. Freehand insertion perioperative brachytherapy (intraoperative placement and postoperative treatment) is the most commonly used technique in soft-tissue sarcomas, with intraoperative radiotherapy and radioactive seed placement being the less commonly used techniques. Brachytherapy can be used as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiotherapy, such as in cases of close/positive margins for safe dose escalation. Although the quantum of side-effects with external beam radiotherapy has considerably reduced with the evolution of technology and the introduction of intensity modulation (intensity-modulated radiotherapy), brachytherapy still scores better in terms of dose conformality, especially in recurrent tumours (previously irradiated) and when used to treat paediatric and geriatric patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Intensity-modulated Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for bone and soft tissue tumors (BSTs) has been reported to have favorable clinical outcomes. Intensity-modulated CIRT (IMCT) techniques have been developed to further reduce dose delivery to adjacent organs compared to conventional CIRT. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical results of IMCT for BSTs and investigated treatment efficacy and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 9 consecutive BSTs patients who underwent IMCT at the Kanagawa Cancer Center from January 2016 to April 2021. IMCT was administered at a dose of 60.8-70.4 Gy (relative biological effect) in 16 fractions. The time to event was calculated from the initiation of IMCT. Toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS: The median age was 49 (range=16-71) years. The median observation period was 57.6 (range=7.0-77.8) months. There were 7 and 2 cases for IMCT because of proximity to the spinal cord and intestinal tract, respectively. There was one death during the observation period, which occurred 7.0 months after the initiation of treatment. Clinical recurrence occurred in 3 patients at 1.3, 17.8, and 22.4 months after the initiation of treatment, respectively. Acute toxicity of Grade 2 or higher was seen in 2 patients with Grade 2 pharyngeal mucositis. Late toxicities of Grade 2 or higher included 1 case each of Grade 2 neuralgia and peripheral neuropathy, as well as 1 case of Grade 3 fracture. CONCLUSION: IMCT for BSTs showed good local therapeutic efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with bone and soft tissue tumors.

Local relapse of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk wall operated on with wide margins without radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: The quality of surgical margins is the most important factor affecting local control in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Despite this, there is no universally accepted consensus on the definition of an adequate surgical margin or on which patients should be offered radiation therapy. This study focuses on local control and its prognostic factors in patients with trunk wall and extremity STS. METHODS: Adult patients with a final diagnosis of trunk wall or extremity STS referred to a single tertiary referral centre between August 1987 and December 2016 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patients were treated according to a protocol instituted in 1987. The classification of surgical margins and indications for radiation therapy were based on anatomy and strict definition of surgical margins as metric distance to the resection border. Local treatment was defined as adequate if patients received either surgery with wide margins alone or marginal surgery combined with radiation therapy. Margins were considered wide if the tumour was excised with pathological margins greater than 2.5 cm or with an uninvolved natural anatomical barrier. After treatment, patients were followed up with local imaging and chest X-ray: 5 years for high-grade STS, 10 years for low-grade STS. RESULTS: A total of 812 patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.8 (range 0.5-19.5) years. Forty-four patients had a grade 1 tumour: there were no instances of recurrence in this group thus they were excluded from further analysis. Five-year local control in the 768 patients with grade 2-3 STS was 90.1 per cent in patients receiving adequate local treatment according to the protocol. Altogether, 333 patients (43.4 per cent) were treated with wide surgery alone and their 5-year local control rate was 91.1 per cent. Among patients treated with wide surgery alone, deep location was the only factor adversely associated with local relapse risk in multivariable analysis; 5-year local control was 95.3 per cent in superficial and 88.3 per cent in deep-sited sarcomas (hazards ratio 3.154 (95% c.i. 1.265 to 7.860), P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: A high local control rate is achievable with surgery alone for a substantial proportion of patients with STS of the extremities or superficial trunk wall.

Radiation osteitis: incidence and clinical impact in the setting of radiation treatment for soft tissue sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy is an important component of soft tissue sarcoma management. Radiation osteitis is a common radiographic finding identified in the setting of radiotherapy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aims to identify the incidence of radiation osteitis in patients who received radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma and if a further workup, including a biopsy, was performed for concerning MRI findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients with soft tissue sarcoma who received radiotherapy from 2008 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with at least one MRI of the sarcoma site following radiotherapy and information regarding radiotherapy treatments were included. MRIs of these patients were reviewed for the presence of radiation osteitis by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The clinical course of these patients including biopsy for concerning MRI findings, local recurrence, and metastasis was recorded. RESULTS: Thirty soft tissue sarcoma patients who received radiation for soft tissue sarcoma were included. Radiation osteitis was present in 18 patients. The time to osteitis present on MRI following radiotherapy completion was a median of 4.5 months. Biopsy for concerning MRI findings was performed in eight patients, five for local recurrence, and three for regional osseous metastasis. Three patients had confirmed osseous metastases. CONCLUSION: Although radiation osteitis is often a benign imaging finding, it can be difficult to discern these lesions from potentially malignant sites of disease. We recommend multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma at sarcoma centers to appropriately identify benign from malignant lesions and decide the necessity of a biopsy.