Impulse oscillometry in the diagnosis of cough variant asthma in children.

BACKGROUND: Cough variant asthma (CVA) is one of the most common causes of chronic cough in children worldwide. The diagnosis of CVA in children remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of impulse oscillometry (IOS) pulmonary function in children with CVA. METHODS: This study included children aged 4 to 12 years diagnosed with CVA who underwent IOS pulmonary function and bronchodilation (BD) tests. A control group of healthy children was matched. Pre- and post-BD IOS parameters were recorded and presented as mean ± standard deviation or median. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the discriminatory potential of the IOS parameters for diagnosing CVA. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients with CVA and 65 control subjects were included. The baseline IOS parameters in the CVA group, except X5%pred, were significantly greater compared to the control group. After inhalation of salbutamol sulfate, all IOS parameters improved significantly in the CVA group. However, Z5%pred, R5%pred, and R20%pred remained greater in the CVA group compared to the control group. The improvement rates of IOS parameters in the CVA group significantly surpassed those in the control group. The ROC curve results for pre-BD IOS parameters and the improvement rate during the BD test showed that the combinations of pre-Z5%pred+△Z5% and pre-R5%pred+△R5% achieved the highest AUC value of 0.920 and 0.898, respectively. The AUC values of these combined parameters surpassed those of individual ones. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that children with CVA exhibit greater IOS parameters compared to healthy children. The changes in IOS parameters during the BD test provided valuable diagnostic information for CVA, and the combination of various parameters can help pediatricians accurately identify CVA in children.

Validation of oscillometric ratio and maximum gradient methods for non-invasive blood pressure measurement with intra-arterial blood pressure measurements as reference.

Most non-invasive blood pressure (BP) measurements are carried out using instruments which implement either the Ratio or the Maximum Gradient oscillometric method, mostly during cuff deflation, but more rarely during cuff inflation. Yet, there is little published literature on the relative advantages and accuracy of these two methods. In this study of 40 lightly sedated individuals aged 64.1 ± 9.6 years, we evaluate and compare the performance of the oscillometric ratio (K) and gradient (Grad) methods for the non-invasive estimation of mean pressure, SBP and DBP with reference to invasive intra-arterial values. There was no significant difference between intra-arterial estimates of mean pressure made via Korotkoff sounds (MP-OWE) or the gradient method (MP-Grad). However, 17.7% of MP-OWE and 15% of MP-Grad were in error by more than 10 mmHg. SBP-K and SBP-Grad underestimated SBP by 14 and 18 mmHg, whilst accurately estimating DBP with mean errors of 0.4 ±â€Š5.0 and 1.7 ±â€Š6.1 mmHg, respectively. Relative to the reference standard SBP-K, SBP-Grad and DBP-Grad were estimated with a mean error of -4.5 ±â€Š6.6 and 1.4 ±â€Š5.6 mmHg, respectively, noting that using the full range of recommended ratios introduces errors of 12 and 7 mmHg in SBP and DBP, respectively. We also show that it is possible to find ratios which minimize the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean error for any particular individual cohort. We developed linear models for estimating SBP and SBP-K from a range of demographic and non-invasive OWE variables with resulting mean errors of 0.15 ±â€Š5.6 and 0.3 ±â€Š5.7 mmHg, acceptable according to the Universal standard.

Comparison of cardiac output estimates obtained from the Antares oscillometric pulse wave analysis algorithm and from Doppler transthoracic echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: In cardiology, cardiac output (CO) is an important parameter for assessing cardiac function. While invasive thermodilution procedures are the gold standard for CO assessment, transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) has become the established method for routine CO assessment in daily clinical practice. However, a demand persists for non-invasive approaches, including oscillometric pulse wave analysis (PWA), to enhance the accuracy of CO estimation, reduce complications associated with invasive procedures, and facilitate its application in non-intensive care settings. Here, we aimed to compare the TTE and oscillometric PWA algorithm Antares for a non-invasive estimation of CO. METHODS: Non-invasive CO data obtained by two-dimensional TTE were compared with those from an oscillometric blood pressure device (custo med GmbH, Ottobrunn, Germany) using the integrated algorithm Antares (Redwave Medical GmbH, Jena, Germany). In total, 59 patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization for clinical reasons (71±10 years old, 76% males) were included. Agreement between both CO measures were assessed by Bland-Altman analysis, Student's t-test, and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: The mean difference in CO was 0.04 ± 1.03 l/min (95% confidence interval for the mean difference: -0.23 to 0.30 l/min) for the overall group, with lower and upper limits of agreement at -1.98 and 2.05 l/min, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in means between both CO measures (P = 0.785). Statistically significant correlations between TTE and Antares CO were observed in the entire cohort (r = 0.705, P<0.001) as well as in female (r = 0.802, P<0.001) and male patients (r = 0.669, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric PWA algorithm Antares and established TTE for a non-invasive estimation of CO are highly correlated in male and female patients, with no statistically significant difference between both approaches. Future validation studies of the Antares CO are necessary before a clinical application can be considered.

One size does not fit all: universal cuff overestimates oscillometric blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference.

OBJECTIVE: Some brachial cuffs for oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement are claimed to cover a wide range of upper-arm circumferences; however, their validation is rarely conducted. Our aim was to compare oscillometric BP measurements obtained with a universal cuff with those obtained with an appropriately sized cuff. METHODS: We utilised the Microlife B6 Connect monitor, conducting oscillometric BP measurements in a random sequence with both a universal cuff (recommended for arm circumferences from 22 to 42 cm) and an appropriately sized cuff (medium for circumference 22-32 cm and large for 32-42 cm). We included 91 individuals with an arm circumference of 22-32 cm and 64 individuals with an arm circumference of 32-42 cm. RESULTS: For arm circumferences > 32 cm, systolic and diastolic BP measured with the universal cuff was higher than that measured with the large cuff (systolic 6.4 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI]). 3.9-8.8, diastolic 2.4 mmHg, 95%CI, 1.2-3.7, p < 0.001 for both). Overestimation of BP with the universal cuff was statistically significant after correcting for the sequence of measurements. No statistical difference was found between the universal cuff and medium cuff for circumferences in the 22-32 cm range. The bladder size in the universal cuff matched the dimensions of the medium-sized cuff; however, the cuff was larger. CONCLUSION: Overestimation of BP measured with a universal cuff in persons with large arm circumferences is clinically important. It poses the risk of unnecessary initiation or intensification of antihypertensive medication in persons using the universal cuff.

What is the context?Clinical guidelines recommend individualisation of the size of the cuff used for blood pressure measurement according to the circumference of the upper arm.Many blood pressure monitors are sold with a single "universal" cuff claimed to cover a wide range of upper arm sizes.We compared blood pressure obtained with the Microlife B6 Connect monitor and a "universal" cuff with the results obtained with individual sized cuffs (medium size for arm circumference between 22 and 32 cm and large size for arm circumference between 32 and 42 cm).What is new?In persons with large upper arm circumference is the systolic blood pressure 6.4 mmHg higher and the diastolic blood pressure 2.4 mmHg higher with the universal cuff than with the individual-sized large cuff.What is the impact?The universal cuff overestimates blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference.

Respiratory Oscillometry and Functional Performance in Different COPD Phenotypes.

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotypes may introduce different characteristics that need to be known to improve treatment. Respiratory oscillometry provides a detailed analysis and may offer insight into the pathophysiology of COPD. In this paper, we used this method to evaluate the differences in respiratory mechanics of COPD phenotypes. Patients and Methods: This study investigated a sample of 83 volunteers, being divided into control group (CG = 20), emphysema (n = 23), CB (n = 20) and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS, n = 20). These analyses were performed before and after bronchodilator (BD) use. Functional capacity was evaluated using the Glittre­ADL test, handgrip strength and respiratory pressures. Results: Initially it was observed that oscillometry provided a detailed description of the COPD phenotypes, which was consistent with the involved pathophysiology. A correlation between oscillometry and functional capacity was observed (r=-0.541; p = 0.0001), particularly in the emphysema phenotype (r = -0.496, p = 0.031). BD response was different among the studied phenotypes. This resulted in an accurate discrimination of ACOS from CB [area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) = 0.84] and emphysema (AUC = 0.82). Conclusion: These results offer evidence that oscillatory indices may enhance the comprehension and identification of COPD phenotypes, thereby potentially improving the support provided to these patients.

Lower Arginine Bioavailability, Increased FeNO Levels, and Airway Resistance on Impulse Oscillometry Are Characteristics of Asthma in Children and Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease.

Background and Objectives: Data on characteristics of asthma in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) is conflicting. Recently, the L-arginine pathway has gained attention in the pathogenesis of asthma and SCD. This study aimed to determine the distinctive clinical and laboratory features and the role of arginine metabolism in asthmatic children with SCD. Materials and Methods: A total of 52 children and adolescents with SCD, including 24 with asthma (SCD-A) and 28 without asthma (SCD-NA), and 40 healthy controls were included. A questionnaire, atopy tests, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and lung function tests were employed. Serum metabolites of the arginine pathway were measured. The results of the three groups were compared. Results: The demographic characteristics and atopy markers of the three groups were similar. FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, MMEF%, and total lung capacity (TLC%) values of SCD-A patients were not significantly different from the SCD-NA group, but they were significantly lower than the values measured in the controls. FeNO values greater than 35 ppb were present only in the SCD-A group. In impulse oscillometry, median resistance values at 5 Hz (R5)% were higher in both SCD subgroups than in healthy controls (p = 0.001). The (R5-20/R5)% values were higher in the SCD-A group (p = 0.028). Serum arginine levels and arginine bioavailability indices were significantly lower in the SCD-A group than in the SCD-NA group and healthy controls (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). Conclusions: Asthma in children with SCD was not associated with atopy or low FEV1/FVC levels. However, lower arginine bioavailability and higher FeNO levels differentiated asthma in patients with SCD. High R5% and (R5-20/R5)% values indicated increased airway resistance in SCD, with a predominance of small airway disease in asthmatics.

Impulse oscillometry in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: an exploratory study.

INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest peripheral airway abnormalities in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH). Impulse Oscillometry (IOS) is a noninvasive and sensitive technique for assessing the small airways. It evaluates the impedance of the respiratory system ‒ Resistance (R) and reactance (X) ‒ to a pulse of sound waves sent to the lungs, in a range of frequencies (5‒20 Hz). METHOD: Resistance variables: R5, R20, R5-R20 and reactance variables: AX (reactance area) and Fres (resonance frequency). The aim is to evaluate R and X in patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH) and to investigate whether there is a correlation between IOS and spirometry. RESULTS: Thirteen IPAH patients and 11 healthy subjects matched for sex and age underwent IOS and spirometry. IPAH patients had lower FVC and FEV1 values (p < 0.001), VEF1/CVF (p = 0.049) and FEF 25-75 (p = 0.006) than healthy patients. At IOS, IPAH patients showed lower tidal volumes and higher AX (p < 0.05) compared to healthy individuals, and 53.8 of patients had R5-R20 values ≥ 0.07 kPa/L/s. Correlation analysis: X5, AX, R5-R20 and Fres showed moderate correlation with FVC (p = 0.036 r = 0.585, p = 0.001 r = -0.687, p = 0.005 r = -0.726 and p = 0.027 r = -0.610); Fres (p = 0.012 r = -0.669) and AX (p = 0.006 r = -0.711) correlated with FEV1; [R5 and R20, (R5-R20)] also correlated with FEV1 (p < 0.001 r = -0.573, p = 0.020 r = -0.634 and p = 0.010 r = -0.683, respectively) in the IPAH group. There were also moderate correlations of FEF 25-75 % with Z5 (p = 0.041), R5 (p = 0.018), Fres (p = 0.043) and AX (p = 0.023). DISCUSSION: Patients showed changes suggestive of increased resistance and reactance in the IOS compared to healthy individuals, and the IOS findings showed a good correlation with spirometry variables.

Comparison of Doppler ultrasonic sphygmomanometry, oscillometry and high-definition oscillometry for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic arterial hypertension is a common occurrence and can have serious adverse consequences in cats. Therefore, measuring blood pressure is very important. There are many indirect blood pressure measurement devices available. This study compared Doppler, oscillometric (petMAP Graphic II, SunTech Vet20, the Cardell Insight-X0000) and high-definition oscillometry devices for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure in conscious cats. METHODS: In this prospective study, blood pressure was measured in 32 cats using the different devices according to the recommendations of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Consensus Statement. Blood pressures (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP]), time to complete measurements, number of attempts needed, coefficient of variation (CV) between the blood pressure measurements of the different devices, ease of completing measurements and apparent stress level of the cat were assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between devices in the time taken to obtain blood pressure readings and the number of attempts necessary to obtain six reliable measurements. The CV of the Doppler device was significantly smaller than that of the rest of the devices, but there were no other differences between the devices. The mean SBP, DBP and MAP measured by the petMAP device were significantly higher than the measurements from the other devices. The perceived ease of measurement was not significantly different between the various machines. The perceived level of stress of measurement with the Doppler device was significantly higher compared with the other devices but did not lead to an increased SBP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using a Doppler device to measure blood pressure in conscious cats is fast, relatively easy and gives reliable results. A disadvantage is that the Doppler device can only measure SBP, while oscillometric devices also provide DBP and MAP. However, in veterinary medicine, systolic hypertension is considered the most relevant.

Comparisons of an automated oscillometric device with a hybrid manual auscultatory device for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

This study evaluated an oscillometric device (OD), Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB, and a hybrid manual auscultatory device (AD), Greenlight 300TM, to determine a suitable blood pressure (BP) measurement device for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in a mercury-free context. Adhering to the 2018 Universal Standard's suggested consensus, the study involved 800 subjects (mean age 51.2 ± 17.5 years; 44.3% male), who underwent triplicate BP measurements following 5 min of rest in a randomized order (OD-first: 398 participants; AD-first: 402 participants). BP difference was calculated as OD value minus AD value, with results stratified by measurement sequence. The overall BP difference and tolerable error probability were -1.1 ± 6.5/-2.6 ± 4.9 mmHg and 89.2%/92.5% for systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP), respectively. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.907/0.844 for SBP/DBP (OD-first/AD-first: 0.925/0.892 for SBP, 0.842/0.845 for DBP). The overall agreement for hypertension (BP ≥ 140 and/or 90 mmHg) was 0.71 (p < 0.0001), and the OD underestimated the overall hypertension prevalence by 5.1%. Analysis of the AD-first data revealed a lower level of agreement compared to the OD-first data; however, the observed blood pressure difference adhered to Criterion 1 of the 2018 Universal Standard. Microlife met the Criterion 1 of 2018 Universal Standard but underestimated the prevalence of hypertension. The BP discrepancy increased with higher BP levels, male sex, and smaller AC. With increasing age, the discrepancy decreased for SBP and increased for DBP.

Impulse oscillometry bronchodilator response in preschool children.

BACKGROUND: In preschoolers, performing an acceptable spirometry and measuring bronchodilator response (BDR) is challenging; in this context, impulse oscillometry (IOS) represents a valid alternative. However, more studies on the standardization of BDR for IOS in young children are required. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify optimal thresholds to define a positive BDR test with IOS in preschoolers with suspected asthma. METHODS: Children aged 3-6 years with suspected asthma and their lung function investigated with both IOS and spirometry pre- and post-BDR were retrospectively analyzed. The spirometric BDR was defined as positive when the change of FEV1 was ≥12% or ≥200 mL. The oscillometric BDR was defined as positive in case of change of at least -40% in R5, +50% in X5, and -80% in AX. RESULTS: Among 72 patients, 36 (age 5.2 ± 1 years; 64% boys) were selected for the subsequent analysis according to ATS/ERS quality criteria of measurements; specifically, 19 patients did not meet IOS and 36 did not meet spirometry criteria. The spirometric BDR was found positive in seven subjects (19.4%); conversely, a positive oscillometric BDR was identified in four patients (11.1%). No patient presented a positive BDR response with both methods. In IOS, the mean decrease in R5 and AX was 19.9% ± 10% and 44% ± 22.1%, and the mean increase in X5 was 23.3% ± 17.8%, respectively. A decrease in R5 of 25.7% (AUC 0.77, p = .03) and an increase in X5 of 25.7% (AUC 0.75, p = .04) showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity to detect an increase of FEV1 ≥ 12% and/or ≥200 mL. CONCLUSION: The IOS represents a valid alternative to spirometry to measure BDR in preschool children and should be the gold standard in this age group. We are considering a decrease of 26% in R5 and an increase of 26% in X5 as diagnostic threshold for BDR.

Impulse oscillometry assessment of respiratory function in pediatric patients with a history of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: While coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is generally considered to exhibit a less severe clinical course in children than in adults, studies have demonstrated that respiratory symptoms can endure for more than 3 months following infection in at least one-third of pediatric cases. The present study evaluates the respiratory functions of children aged 3-15 years within 3-6 months of their recovery from COVID-19 using impulse oscillometry (IOS) and compares them with the values of healthy children. METHODS: Included in this prospective cross-sectional study were 63 patients (patient group) aged 3-15 years who contracted COVID-19 between December 2021 and May 2022, as well as 57 healthy children as a control group, matched for age and sex. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the patients were recorded, and respiratory function was assessed based on airway resistance (zR5, zR20, R5-20) and reactance (zX5, zX20, reactance area [AX], resonant frequency [Fres]) using an IOS device. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the age, weight, height, and body weight z score values of the two groups (p > .05). While the zR5 and R5-20 levels of the patient group were higher (p = .008 and p < .001, respectively) than those of the controls, the zR20, AX, and Fres values did not differ significantly between the groups (p > .05). The parameters indicating the reactance, including zX5 and zX20, were significantly lower in the patient group than in the control group (p = .028 and p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Total and peripheral airway resistances were found to be elevated in children who had recovered from COVID-19 in the preceding 3-6 months.

The impact of respiratory reactance in oscillometry on survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease with a poor prognosis. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) aid in evaluating the disease status of IPF. The clinical significance of oscillometry measurements in interstitial lung diseases has recently been reported. Our previous study showed that respiratory reactance (Xrs) measured by oscillometry reflected disease severity and predicted subsequent lung capacity decline in patients with IPF. However, the direct impact of Xrs on survival needs to be determined, and there are currently no reference values in oscillometry to predict prognosis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between oscillometry measurements, particularly Xrs, and survival in patients with IPF and to determine the cutoff values of Xrs that predict 3-year survival. METHODS: We analyzed the relationship between the measured values of PFT and oscillometry derived from 178 patients with IPF. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to investigate the relationships between clinical indices at the time of the first oscillometry and survival. We performed the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to set the optimized cutoff values of Xrs for 3-year survival prediction. We examined the discriminating power of cutoff values of Xrs on survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Xrs components, especially in the inspiratory phase (In), significantly correlated with the PFT values. In the multivariate analyses, Xrs (all of reactance at 5 Hz [X5], resonant frequency [Fres], and low-frequency reactance area [ALX] in the inspiratory phase) had a significant impact on survival (X5, p = 0.003; Fres, p = 0.016; ALX, p = 0.003) independent of age, sex, and other prognostic factors derived from the univariate analysis. The area under the ROC curve was 0.765, 0.759, and 0.766 for X5 In, Fres In, and ALX In, with cutoff values determined at - 0.98, 10.67, and 5.32, respectively. We found significant differences in survival after dividing patients using each of the cutoff values of Xrs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IPF, Xrs measured by oscillometry significantly impacted survival. We also determined the cutoff values of Xrs to discriminate patients with poor prognoses.

Impulse Oscillometry as an Alternative Lung Function Test for Hospitalized Adults.

BACKGROUND: Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a noninvasive technique that measures lung physiology independently of patient effort. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the utility of IOS parameters in comparison with pulmonary function testing (PFT) among hospitalized subjects, with emphasis on obstructive and small airway diseases. METHODS: Sixty-one subjects hospitalized either with unexplained dyspnea or for pre-surgery evaluation were included in the study. All subjects underwent PFTs and IOS test. The correlation between IOS results and PFTs was examined in different subgroups. The ability of IOS parameters to predict abnormal PFTs was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and optimal cutoff values were calculated. RESULTS: IOS results were found to correlate with PFT values. Subgroup analysis revealed that these correlations were higher in younger (age < 70) and non-obese (body mass index < 25kg/m2) subjects. The resonant frequency was an independent predictor and had the best predictive ability for abnormal FEV1/FVC (area under the ROC curve 0.732 [95% CI 0.57-0.90], optimal cutoff 17 Hz, 87% sensitivity, 62% specificity) and abnormal forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC maneuver (area under the ROC curve 0.667 [95% CI 0.53-0.81], optimal cutoff 15 Hz, 77% sensitivity, 54% specificity). Area of reactance and the difference in respiratory resistance at 5 Hz and 20 Hz also showed a good predictive ability for abnormal FEV1/FVC (area under the ROC curve 0.716 and 0.730, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the IOS performed well in diagnosing small airway and obstructive diseases among hospitalized subjects. IOS might serve as an alternative to standard PFTs in non-cooperative or dyspneic hospitalized patients.

Adding oscillometry to spirometry in guidelines better identifies uncontrolled asthma, future exacerbations, and potential targeted therapy.

The objective of this review is to provide new advances in our understanding of the clinical importance of establishing peripheral airway impairment (PAI) by impulse oscillometry (IOS) and targeted therapy, which could result in better asthma outcomes. Data sources include PubMed and Google search, limited to English language and human disease, with key words IOS and asthma. Key findings include PAI being consistently associated with uncontrolled asthma across ethnicities, using IOS reference equations factoring Hispanic and White reference algorithms. It is noted that PAI is common even in patients considered well-controlled by asthma guidelines. In a large longitudinal analysis (Assessment of Small Airways Involved in Asthma or ATLANTIS study), a composite of R5-R20, AX, and X5 ordinal scores were independently predictive of asthma control and exacerbation in a multivariate analysis, but forced expiratory volume in 1 second was not significantly predictive of morbidities. However, combining forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 80% with PAI resulted in greater odds of identifying uncontrolled asthma and exacerbations, than either alone. Applying an external validation method in children with asthma offers the clinician the IOS reference equations best fit for their own specific population. Several clinical phenotypes can also identify PAI with high probability, useful when IOS is not available. Poor asthma outcomes for obese patients with asthma are associated with dysanapsis and PAI, not obesity alone. Extrafine inhaled corticosteroids achieve better asthma control and improve peripheral airway function with fewer exacerbations at lower dosages than nonextrafine inhaled corticosteroid aerosols. In conclusion, these data support the benefit of adding IOS to spirometry in future asthma guidelines and suggest the potential benefit from targeted therapy.

Impulse Oscillometry Versus Spirometry to Detect Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Bilateral Lung Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Diagnostic Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and especially bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), remain dominant causes of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Interest is growing in the forced oscillation technique, of which impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a form, as a tool to improve our understanding of these disorders. However, data remain limited and no longitudinal studies have been published, meaning there is no information regarding any capacity IOS may have for the early detection of CLAD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective longitudinal study enrolling a consecutive sample of adult bilateral lung transplant recipients with healthy lung allografts or CLAD and performed ongoing paired IOS and spirometry tests on a clinically determined basis. We assessed for correlations between IOS and spirometry and examined any predictive value either modality may hold for the early detection of BOS. RESULTS: We enrolled 91 patients and conducted testing for 43 mo, collecting 558 analyzable paired IOS and spirometry tests, with a median of 9 tests per subject (interquartile range, 5-12) and a median testing interval of 92 d (interquartile range, 62-161). Statistically significant moderate-to-strong correlations were demonstrated between all IOS parameters and spirometry, except resistance at 20 Hz, which is a proximal airway measure. No predictive value for the early detection of BOS was found for IOS or spirometry. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first longitudinal data from IOS after lung transplantation and adds considerably to the growing literature, showing unequivocal correlations with spirometry but failing to demonstrate a predictive value for BOS.

[The possibilities of impulse oscillometry in the diagnosis of the lung function disorders after COVID-19].

BACKGROUND: Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is an effort independent method of studying lung mechanics. AIM: To study the diagnostic significance of IOS in assessing lung mechanics after COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion test (DLco), IOS parameters were analyzed in 315 patients (the median age 48 years), the median period from the beginning of COVID-19 to the study was 50 days. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and one-dimensional logistic regression analysis with an assessment of odds ratios. RESULTS: In general group, spirometry and body plethysmography parameters were in normal values, while DLCO was reduced in 61% of patients. Parameters of IOS were analyzed in the general group and between the groups, depending on the value of DLco and total lung capacity (TLC): normal or reduced. In general group, reactance area (AX), hererogeneity of resistance Rrs5-Rrs20, resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5), reactance at 5 Hz (ΔXrs5) were increased in 29.8%, 17.8%, 6%, 4.8% of patients, respectively, and were statistically significantly higher in the group with reduced TLC, whereas in the group with reduced DLco AX, Rrs5-Rrs20 were statistically significantly higher. Logistic regression analysis showed that patients with Rrs5-Rrs20>0.07 kPa×sec/l or AX>0.32 kPa/l had a 1.99-fold and 2.24-fold increased risk for decrease DLco, respectively, while the risk of decrease in TLC was 2.25-fold (p=0.012) and 3.16-fold (p<0.001) higher, respectively. CONCLUSION: IOS allow to detect both dysfunction of small airways (if AX or Rrs5-Rrs20 are increased) and the risk of restrictive pattern and lung diffusion impairment after COVID-19.

Oscillometry in Stable Single and Double Lung Allograft Recipients Transplanted for Interstitial Lung Disease: Results of a Multi-Center Australian Study.

Peak spirometry after single lung transplantation (SLTx) for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is lower than after double lung transplantation (DLTx), however the pathophysiologic mechanisms are unclear. We aim to assess respiratory mechanics in SLTx and DLTx for ILD using oscillometry. Spirometry and oscillometry (tremoflo® C-100) were performed in stable SLTx and DLTx recipients in a multi-center study. Resistance (R5, R5-19) and reactance (X5) were compared between LTx recipient groups, matched by age and gender. A model of respiratory impedance using ILD and DLTx data was performed. In total, 45 stable LTx recipients were recruited (SLTx n = 23, DLTx n = 22; males: 87.0% vs. 77.3%; median age 63.0 vs. 63.0 years). Spirometry was significantly lower after SLTx compared with DLTx: %-predicted mean (SD) FEV1 [70.0 (14.5) vs. 93.5 (26.0)%]; FVC [70.5 (16.8) vs. 90.7 (12.8)%], p < 0.01. R5 and R5-19 were similar between groups (p = 0.94 and p = 0.11, respectively) yet X5 was significantly worse after SLTx: median (IQR) X5 [-1.88 (-2.89 to -1.39) vs. -1.22 (-1.87 to -0.86)] cmH2O.s/L], p < 0.01. R5 and X5 measurements from the model were congruent with measurements in SLTx recipients. The similarities in resistance, yet differences in spirometry and reactance between both transplant groups suggest the important contribution of elastic properties to the pathophysiology. Oscillometry may provide further insight into the physiological changes occurring post-LTx.

Correlation of Impulse Oscillometry with Spirometry in Deployed Military Personnel with Airway Obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of chronic respiratory symptoms in deployed military personnel has been conducted at Brooke Army Medical Center as part of the Study of Active Duty Military for Pulmonary Disease Related to Environmental Deployment Exposures III study. Although asthma and airway hyperreactivity have been the most common diagnoses, the clinical findings in these patients may be multifactorial. This study aims to evaluate the utility of impulse oscillometry (IOS) in diagnosing airway obstruction in patients undergoing multiple pulmonary function testing (PFT) studies. METHODS: Military personnel referred for deployed-related pulmonary symptoms underwent a standardized evaluation at Brooke Army Medical Center and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center over a 5-year span. Initial studies included laboratory tests, high-resolution computed tomography imaging, cardiac evaluation with electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. PFT consisted of full PFTs, forced inspiratory/expiratory pressures, post-spirometry bronchodilator testing, IOS, exhaled nitric oxide, and methacholine challenge testing. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients have completed an evaluation to date. In this cohort, 108 patients (30.0%) have evidence of obstruction by spirometry, whereas 74 (20.6%) had IOS values of both an R5 > 150% and X5 < -1.5. Only 32 (8.9%) had evidence of obstruction by both spirometry and IOS, whereas 210 (57.3%) had neither. A comparison among R5 (resistance at 5 Hz), R20 (resistance at 20 Hz), and X5 (reactance at 5 Hz) was performed in those individuals with and without spirometric obstruction. R5 (% predicted) was 156.2 ± 57.4% (obstruction) vs. 129.1 ± 39.6% (no obstruction) (P < .001); R20 (% predicted) was 138.1 ± 37.7% (obstruction) vs. 125.3 ± 31.2% (no obstruction) (P = .007); and X5 (cmH2O/L/s) was -1.62 ± 1.28 (obstruction) vs. -1.25 ± 0.55 (no obstruction) (P < .001). DISCUSSION: Impulse oscillometry has been advocated as a supplemental pulmonary function test to aid in the diagnosis of airway obstruction. The use of IOS has been primarily used in pediatrics and elderly populations as a validated tool to establish a diagnosis of airway obstruction but is limited in the adult population because of a well-validated set of reference values. Prior studies in adults have most often demonstrated a correlation with an elevated R5 > 150%, elevated resonant frequency, and a negative X5 < -1.5 or a decrease of 30 to 35% in R5 post-bronchodilator. CONCLUSION: Impulse oscillometry may serve as an adjunct to diagnosis but likely cannot replace a standard spirometric evaluation. Our study highlights the future utility for diagnosing early obstructive disease in the symptomatic individual.