Role of vitamin D and calcium nutrition in disease expression and parathyroid tumor growth in primary hyperparathyroidism: a global perspective.

Since the classic description by Fuller Albright in the 1940s, primary hyperparathyroidism has evolved from a disease with classic signs and symptoms to a disease in search of symptoms! Since that time, two major events have occurred. First, in the United States, United Kingdom, and in most European countries, there has been a steady rise in the apparent incidence of the disease. Second, there has been a dramatic shift in the pattern of presentation. A majority of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism in countries with multichannel screening panels are asymptomatic. Skeletal and renal complications are uncommon, and osteitis fibrosa is rare. In contrast, the clinical presentation of primary hyperparathyroidism has changed very little in other regions such as the East, the Middle East, and some parts of the southern hemisphere over the same period of observation. Accordingly, we assessed the influence of vitamin D and calcium nutrition on the disease expression and parathyroid tumor growth in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism from different parts of the world. Between 1945 and 1950, both the prevalence of osteitis fibrosa and parathyroid tumor weight declined dramatically in the United States, coinciding with fortification of milk with vitamin D. In contrast, osteitis fibrosa and parathyroid tumor weight changed very little in parts of the world where vitamin D depletion is endemic. Furthermore, for a comparable degree of vitamin D depletion, Asian Indians have significantly larger tumors compared with Americans (3.95 +/- 2.23 vs. 0.66 +/- 2.84 g; p < 0.001). Within the United States, blacks have larger tumors compared with whites (0.78 +/- 2.87 vs. 0.58 +/- 2.78 g; p < 0.01). However, the slopes of regression between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, the best index of vitamin D nutrition, and parathyroid tumor weight, the best available index of parathyroid growth, were not significantly different between Asian Indians, whites, and blacks. We conclude that vitamin D and calcium nutrition of the population affect both the clinical expression and parathyroid tumor growth in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. It will be of interest to see if the pattern of presentation of primary hyperparathyroidism changes when better nutritional policies are implemented in developing countries.

Primary hyperparathyroidism: pathophysiology and impact on bone.

Primary hyperparathyroidism has been associated with bone loss, especially at cortical skeletal sites. Results from studies evaluating the mineral density of cancellous bone have been more difficult to interpret. Most densitometry studies support the concept that the parathyroid hormone appears to be catabolic at cortical sites and may have anabolic effects at cancellous bone sites. Studies completed to date, however, have been limited by design, definitions of fracture and inadequate control groups. Primary hyperparathyroidism is now increasingly being detected during the asymptomatic phase. The need for parathyroidectomy has been questioned in such patients because there may be no disease progression in the absence of surgery. Medical management of primary hyperparathyroidism has to date been limited to estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Identification of the calcium receptor has improved our understanding of calcium homeostasis, and significant reductions in calcium receptor levels have been detected in parathyroid adenomas. Thus, a new class of therapeutics may include the calcimimetic agents. Bisphosphonates are also currently being evaluated with regard to their impact on fracture prevention and their beneficial effects on bone mineral density.

Mineralized bone loss at different sites in dialysis patients: implications for prevention.

To characterize the magnitude and location of mineralized bone loss, 40 patients (20 men, 20 women, 29 white, 11 black) with clinically significant renal osteodystrophy who could be unambiguously classified based on histologic criteria as having osteitis fibrosa (OF; 20 cases) or osteomalacia (OM; 20 cases) were studied; they had been on maintenance hemodialysis for 4.6 +/- 3.0 yr. One hundred forty-two healthy women of similar age and ethnic composition served as control subjects. In all subjects, the proportions of mineralized bone, osteoid, and porosity (nonbone soft tissue) were measured separately in cortical and cancellous bone tissue, from intact full-thickness biopsies of the ilium, representative of the axial skeleton. The results were related to the volumes of cortical and cancellous bone tissue separately and to the volume of the entire biopsy core. Approximately three-quarters of the patients had measurements in the appendicular skeleton by single photon absorptiometry of the radius and morphometry of the metacarpal. Disease effects did not differ significantly between ethnic groups. Mineralized cortical bone volume (per unit of core volume) was reduced by approximately 45% in both patient groups. Mineralized cancellous bone volume was significantly increased by 36% in the patients with OF and nonsignificantly reduced by 9% in the patients with OM; however, the reduction in the latter patients was significant in relation to tissue volume. The combined total deficit for both types of iliac bone was approximately 20% in the patients with OF and approximately 40% in the patients with OM. Significant reductions in appendicular cortical bone were demonstrated in both patient groups at both measurement sites. Regardless of the current histologic classification, the major structural abnormality in the skeleton is generalized thinning of cortical bone due to increased net endocortical resorption, the most characteristic effect on bone of hyperparathyroidism. Protection of the skeleton from the adverse consequences of renal failure will require therapeutic intervention in patients with no symptoms of either renal or bone disease.