The trend of dental check-up and prevalence of dental complications following the use of bone modifying agents in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer: analysis of data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service.

BACKGROUND: Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are key components in the management of cancer patients with bone metastasis. Despite their clinical benefits, the use of BMA is associated with dental adverse events (AEs) including medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study investigated the frequency of dental surveillance before BMA treatment and the prevalence of dental AEs including MRONJ, after BMA treatment in patients with bone metastasis from breast and prostate cancer using data from the national health insurance system. METHODS: Data, including age, cancer diagnosis, administered BMA, and dental AEs during cancer treatment, of patients with bone metastasis from breast and prostate cancer who received at least one infusion of BMA between 2007 and 2019 were extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (KNHIS) dataset. RESULTS: Of the 15,357 patients who received BMA, 1,706 patients (11.1%) underwent dental check-ups before BMA treatment. The proportion of patients receiving dental check-up increased from 4.4% in 2007 to 16.7% in 2019. Referral to dentists for a dental check-up was more active in clinics/primary hospitals than general/tertiary hospitals, and medical doctors and urologists actively consulted to dentists than general surgeons, regardless of the patient's health insurance status. After BMA treatment, 508 patients (3.8%) developed dental AEs, including abscess (42.9%), acute periodontitis (29.7%), acute pericoronitis (14.9%), and MRONJ (12.5% of dental AEs cases, 0.5% of total BMA treated patients). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the long treatment period in patients with metastatic cancer, coordination between dentists and oncologists is necessary to ensure appropriate dental management before the initiation of BMA.

Recognizing bisphosphonate-induced ear osteonecrosis in primary care: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Medication-related ear canal osteonecrosis (MRECO) is a growing concern linked to prolonged anti-resorptive medication use. Despite primary care providers being key prescribers of these medications, there is limited information about MRECO in primary care literature. This article presents a case of bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the external auditory canal (EAC), emphasizing the vital role of primary care providers in identifying this rare yet significant side effect of anti-resorptive medication. MAIN SYMPTOMS AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 65-year-old female, on long-term alendronic acid for osteoporosis, presented to primary care with a 2-year history of left-sided ear blockage and itchiness. Despite prolonged topical treatment for ear wax, symptoms persisted, leading to an Otolaryngology referral. Microsuction revealed exposed bone in the left EAC. DIAGNOSES, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOMES: A computed tomography scan confirmed bony erosion of the left EAC, and in the absence of other osteonecrosis risk factors, bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis was diagnosed. Management involved bisphosphonate discontinuation, regular aural toilet, and topical treatment, achieving complete ear canal epithelialisation within 6 months. CONCLUSION: MRECO, a rare complication of anti-resorptive therapy, is anticipated to rise with increasing antiresorptive medication use in the ageing population. Unexplained ear symptoms in those with a history of current or prior anti-resorptive therapy should raise clinical concern, prompting evaluation for exposed bone in the EAC. Raising awareness of MRECO among primary care providers is crucial for early diagnosis and timely management.

Physicians' awareness of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with osteoporosis.

A serious adverse effect of antiresorptive drugs, which are widely used to treat osteoporosis, is medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Physicians can reduce the risk of MRONJ by educating patients and emphasizing the importance of good oral health. However, limited information is available regarding physicians' awareness and clinical practices associated with MRONJ. Hence, this study aimed to examine physicians' awareness related to MRONJ and associated clinical practices. This study was a cross-sectional study conducted from December 2022 to February 2023. An online self-administered questionnaire was sent to physicians in Thailand who prescribed antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis. Most respondents agreed that antiresorptive drugs might cause MRONJ (92.3%), poor oral health increased the risk of MRONJ (84%), and MRONJ is an important consideration in patients with osteoporosis (85%). Of the respondents, 48.1% and 15.5% always referred patients to dentists before and during antiresorptive therapy, respectively. Approximately 60% of physicians informed patients of the MRONJ risk before prescribing antiresorptive drugs, and 30% inquired about patients' oral symptoms at the follow-up visit. Overall, 44% of physicians advised patients to receive oral health care; the most common reason for not advising this was that respondents did not consider themselves to be adequately knowledgeable to detect oral health problems. These findings indicate that while most physicians who prescribed antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis were aware of and considered MRONJ in their practice, several took insufficient action to prevent it. This highlights the need to emphasize clinical practice guidelines and collaboration between physicians and dentists.

The assessment of halitosis with a new screening tool in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the levels of halitosis in patients with Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and osteoporosis and to suggest a new MRONJ screening method using halitosis measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2019 to April 2023, participants aged 19 years or older without periodontal disease were selected. Seventy-five participants, 25 in each group, were divided into an MRONJ group, an osteoporosis group without MRONJ, and a control group without osteoporosis and not taking osteoporosis drugs or antibiotics. Each participant underwent halitosis assessment twice using an exhaled breath analyzer to measure halitosis twice by blowing a straw for 1 min. Measured concentrations of hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, and methyl mercaptan were compared between groups. RESULTS: Data from 22 patients in the MRONJ group, 25 in the osteoporosis group, and 25 in the control group were analyzed. The concentrations of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan were significantly higher in the MRONJ group than in the other groups, but the concentrations of hydrogen did not differ between the groups. When comparing the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan in osteoporosis patients and solid cancer patients in the MRONJ group, there was a significant difference in hydrogen sulfide concentration, but there was no significant difference in methyl mercaptan. CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying the level of halitosis can be used to screen for MRONJ in patients taking bisphosphonates, such as patients with osteoporosis, prostate cancer, and breast cancer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MRONJ is accompanied by bad breath, and the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan are associated with MRONJ.

Risk of healing impairment following tooth extraction in patients administered with antiresorptive and non-antiresorptive polypharmacy.

INTRODUCTION: Lack of evidence existed related to the essential role by which anticancer medications alone or in combination with other polypharmacy would be accountable for wound healing impairment post-dental extraction. The following study was conducted to assess the influence of antiresorptive (AR) and non-antiresorptive (non-AR) drugs and other patient-related risk factors on wound healing status following tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 353 patients (age range: 40-90 years, average age: 67.4 years, clinical and radiological follow-up) were recruited. All the patients were divided into three groups, which included, patients used polypharmacy with non-AR drugs, polypharmacy with a combination of AR + non-AR drugs, and the control group. Based on time of healing, the outcome was defined as, normal healing, delayed healing, and Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The polypharmacy score was categorized depending on the sum of the number of administered medications. RESULTS: The odds of delayed healing were significantly higher in 80+ years old patients (OR=6.98, 95 %CI:2.45-19.88, p = < 0.001) administered with AR+ non-AR drugs (OR=14.68, 95 %CI:4.67-46.14, p = < 0.001), having a major polypharmacy score (OR= 15.37, 95 %CI:4.83-48.91, p = < 0.001). On the contrary, patient administered with non-AR drugs (OR=11.52, 95 %CI: 4.45-29.83, p = < 0.001) with hyper polypharmacy (OR=58.86, 95 %CI:25.03-138.40, p = < 0.001) were significantly more likely to develop MRONJ. Smoking and extraction sites showed no significant impact on wound healing impairment. DISCUSSION: Wound healing status in patients administered with both non-AR and AR+ non-AR polypharmacy was significantly impaired following tooth extraction. Other risk factors, such as increased age and high polypharmacy scoring, also significantly contributed towards the occurrence of delayed healing and MRONJ.

Navigating the complexities and controversies of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): a critical update and consensus statement.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a critical update identifying the knowledge gaps and controversies in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) within the Belgian healthcare context and outline opportunities for improvement and research in these areas. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify guidelines from international clinical societies in oncology or oral and maxillofacial surgery on diagnosing, preventing, and treating MRONJ. The recommendations were critically assessed in light of recent developments in the field and confronted with the clinical experience of experts. RESULTS: Despite progress in the diagnostic criteria of MRONJ, the continued need for an 8-week timeout period should be reconsidered. Furthermore, 3D imaging techniques should be introduced to improve diagnosis and staging. The staging system remains ambiguous regarding Stage 0 MRONJ, and ongoing confusion exists regarding the term non-exposed MRONJ. The prevention of MRONJ should be tailored, considering the individual patient's risk of MRONJ, frailty, and life expectancy. More research seems needed into the efficacy and safety of drug holidays, considering the risks of rebound remodeling on fractures. With renewed interest in surgical and adjunct management techniques, adequately designed clinical studies are needed to help translate trial outcomes into universally applicable treatment guidelines taking into account individual patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Important knowledge gaps remain and hamper the development of clinical guidelines. Several controversies were identified where consensus is lacking, and further harmonization between stakeholders is necessary. Finally, the need for randomized controlled comparative clinical trials in MRONJ resonates harder than ever to identify the best treatment for individual patients.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Prevalence of Cutaneous Manifestations and the Primary Care Physician's Role in its Early Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a side effect in patients undergoing treatment with bone-modifying agents (BMA) for cancer or osteoporosis. Although most cases are treated by oral medicine specialists, some cases may present extraorally as a fistula in the skin or erythematous swelling localized to the jaw area, causing these patients to consult a primary care physician. This study examined the prevalence and clinical characteristics of extraoral manifestations of MRONJ in a large cohort to raise awareness among primary care physicians of this entity, enabling prompt diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Medical records were retrieved of patients diagnosed with MRONJ between 2003 and June 2020 in the Oral Medicine Unit of The Sheba Medical Center, Israel. Data relating to demographics, medical background, type of BMA, and clinical presentation were collected. RESULTS: In total, 515 patients (378 women [73%] and 137 men [27%]; mean age: 65 years, range: 32-94 years) met the inclusion criteria, among whom 84 (16.5%) presented with extraoral manifestations of MRONJ. Of these 84 patients, 21 (24.7%) presented with extraoral fistulas. Extraoral manifestations were strongly correlated with MRONJ of the mandible (n = 67; P = .0006). CONCLUSIONS: MRONJ is a significant side effect of BMA therapy. Although MRONJ mostly presents intraorally, some patients may initially present with extraoral manifestations of erythematous swelling or fistulas localized to the jaw area. Primary care physicians should consider MRONJ as a differential diagnosis in such patients.

Does medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw affect survival of patients with Multiple Myeloma?: Exploring a large single center database using artificial intelligence.

In addition to randomized clinical trials, consideration of Real-World Evidence is necessary for mirroring clinical reality. However, processing such evidence for large numbers of patients often requires considerable time and effort. This is particularly true for rare tumor diseases such as multiple myeloma (MM) or for adverse effects that occur even more rarely. In such cases, artificial intelligence is able to efficiently detect patients with rare conditions. One of these rare adverse events, and the most discussed, following bone protective treatment in MM is medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The association of bone protective treatment to MM outcome has been intensively studied. However, the impact of MRONJ resulting from such treatment on MM prognosis and outcome is poorly understood. In this retrospective study, we therefore investigated the long-term effects of MRONJ. We used natural language processing (NLP) to screen individual data of 2389 MM patients to find 50 out of 52 patients with MRONJ matching our inclusion criteria. To further improve data quality, we then performed propensity score matching. In comparison to MM patients without MRONJ, we found a significantly longer overall survival (median 126 vs. 86 months) despite slightly worse clinical features.

Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws: Clinical and forensic aspects.

OBJECTIVE: This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and other relevant clinical and forensic aspects of a potentially severe complication known as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) while synthesizing state-of-the-art information on bisphosphonates and introducing a possible differential diagnosis. DESIGN: An extensive search was conducted in PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine) without a time or language constraint, focusing on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, site specificity, signs and symptoms, differential diagnosis, prevention, and forensic aspects of MRONJ. All types of original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, opinion articles, guidelines, and letters to editors were considered to produce a complete review on this subject. RESULTS: MRONJ prevention relies on a multidisciplinary approach and is critical since truly effective treatments are lacking. This therapeutic challenge is partly due to uncertainty regarding this condition's pathophysiology. Differential diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with krokodil abuse, one of the most dangerous and homemade psychoactive illicit substances, should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: Further research into the etiology and site specificity of MRONJ is encouraged, aiming to develop novel treatment prospects. Indeed, comprehending this would allow for increased efficacy and therapeutic options while emphasizing the importance of prevention. In addition, we advocate for greater consensus among the various societies regarding MRONJ's treatment and management.

Multiple myeloma identified within the same site of the mandible with medication-related osteonecrosis of jaw: An unusual case report.

RATIONALE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant disease characterized by abnormal proliferation of plasma cells, which usually occurs in middle-aged and elderly male patients. Bisphosphonates (BP) are commonly used for the treatment of MM bone disease. Long-time use of BP may cause medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). MRONJ occurs in jaw exclusively, and Multiple myeloma can also invade the jaw. The 2 diseases have similar clinical manifestations and imaging findings. This report present a case of MM identified in surgical specimen at the site that had been previously pathologically diagnosed as MRONJ in a patient with MM. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 57-years-old male patient visited our clinic on October 16, 2020 because of gingival swelling and pain in the right mandible for 1 month after extraction of the lower right premolar. The patient had a long-time illness history of multiple myeloma, and received intravenous zoledronic acid treatment. DIAGNOSES: Based on the clinical characteristics, imaging, and pathological findings of sequestrum formation and high inflammatory cell infiltration, the patient was diagnosed with MRONJ. After 1 year, a mandibular osteotomy was performed and pathological analysis showed the presence of necrotic bone and a large number of abnormal plasma cell infiltration, suggesting the presence of MM in the mandible. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with a series of conservative treatments including antibiotic treatment, saline irrigation and laser irradiation, as well as superficial sequestration was. One year later, a mandibular osteotomy was performed. OUTCOMES: For the patient, the symptoms of gingival swelling, pain and discharge disappeared after surgery. LESSONS: These findings suggested MRONJ and MM could occur simultaneously at same site, so patients with MM presenting with symptoms of MRONJ should be screened for concurrent or disease relapse of multiple myeloma to prevent misdiagnosis or inadequate management. Meanwhile, this also suggests long-term inflammatory may lead to invasion of multiple myeloma.

Zoledronate and osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporosis: incidence and risk factors. Analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance Database.

INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) have been characterized with the use of oral bisphosphonates in osteoporosis and zoledronate in oncology. Uncertainties remain, though, with the occurrence of BRONJ related to the use of zoledronate in osteoporosis. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the incidence and characterize the risk factors of zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis as compared with oral bisphosphonates in real life setting. METHODS: Cases of BRONJ associated with zoledronate, alendronate or risedronate were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database up to 2020. The incidence of BRONJ was estimated as their respective numbers related to cases of BRONJ in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis, over the same period, according to the Medic'AM database. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2020, BRONJ incidence with zoledronate was 9.6/100,000 patient-year (PY), significantly higher than with alendronate (5.1/100,000 PY, P<0.001), and risedronate (2.0/100,000 PY, P<0.001). The number of patients treated with bisphosphonates has steadily decreased by 44.5% over 10 years. Meanwhile, the incidence of BRONJ decreased (5.8/100,000 PY in 2011; 1.5/100,000 in 2020), although a rebound was observed in 2018, including 47.6% of BRONJ following denosumab. Apart from classical risk factors, recent dental cares stood out in more than 40% of BRONJ, and zoledronate had a shorter exposure time than oral bisphosphonates. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life setting, our data confirm that zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis is scarce, seeming slightly more common compared with oral bisphosphonates. We also raise awareness of dental care guidelines and greater vigilance when using bisphosphonates in patients with previous exposure to denosumab.

Identification of Potential Biomarkers and Small Molecule Drugs for Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ): An Integrated Bioinformatics Study Using Big Data.

This study aimed to identify potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), a rare but serious side effect of bisphosphonate therapy. This study analyzed a microarray dataset (GSE7116) of multiple myeloma patients with BRONJ (n = 11) and controls (n = 10), and performed gene ontology, a pathway enrichment analysis, and a protein-protein interaction network analysis. A total of 1481 differentially expressed genes were identified, including 381 upregulated and 1100 downregulated genes, with enriched functions and pathways related to apoptosis, RNA splicing, signaling pathways, and lipid metabolism. Seven hub genes (FN1, TNF, JUN, STAT3, ACTB, GAPDH, and PTPRC) were also identified using the cytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape. This study further screened small-molecule drugs using CMap and verified the results using molecular docking methods. This study identified 3-(5-(4-(Cyclopentyloxy)-2-hydroxybenzoyl)-2-((3-hydroxybenzo[d]isoxazol-6-yl) methoxy) phenyl) propanoic acid as a potential drug treatment and prognostic marker for BRONJ. The findings of this study provide reliable molecular insight for biomarker validation and potential drug development for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of BRONJ. Further research is needed to validate these findings and develop an effective biomarker for BRONJ.

Evaluation of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) in Terms of Staging and Treatment Strategies by Dental Students at Different Educational Levels.

Background: The role of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) as a dento-maxillo-facial pathology is becoming increasingly important due to its growing prevalence. The success of preventive and therapeutic measures relies mainly on the dentist's ability to correctly diagnose the disease. Methods: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skills of dental students of different educational levels in choosing the correct stage, diagnostics, and treatment option for MRONJ based on clinical and radiographic imaging (panoramic radiograph, CBCT). The study was designed as a cross-sectional cohort study. Twenty dental students were asked to complete a questionnaire in their third and fifth year of studies in which they had to correctly stage the disease, choose the radiological diagnostics and recommend the treatment. The control group contained experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Results: With an overall performance of 59% (third year: 145.2/248 points; fifth year: 145.3/248 points), no statistically significant difference between the educational levels could be observed. The classification based on CBCT imaging was significantly more often correct compared to panoramic radiographs (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights students' lack of knowledge in staging, diagnostics, and treatment of MRONJ, even though the CBCT positively affected decision-making. No significant increase in knowledge could be confirmed through clinical education. This study highlights the need for students to catch up on MRONJ diagnostics and treatment planning. Further expansion of teaching in this disease's context and X-ray diagnostics is needed.

Quantitative proteomics in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVE: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a paradoxical effect associated with bone-modifying agents (BMAs) and other drugs. Currently, no valuable diagnostic or prognosis biomarkers exist. The goal of this research was to study MRONJ-related salivary proteome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This case-control aimed to study salivary proteome in MRONJ versus control groups (i) formed from BMAs consumers and (ii) healthy individuals to unravel biomarkers. Thirty-eight samples of unstimulated whole saliva (18 MRONJ patients, 10 BMA consumers, and 10 healthy controls) were collected. Proteomic analysis by SWATH-MS coupled with bioinformatics analysis was executed. RESULTS: A total of 586 proteins were identified, 175 proteins showed significant differences among MRONJ versus controls. SWATH-MS revealed differentially expressed proteins among three groups, which have never been isolated. These proteins had distinct roles including cell envelope organization, positive regulation of vesicle fusion, positive regulation of receptor binding, or regulation of low-density lipoprotein particle clearance. Integrative analysis prioritized 3 proteins (MMP9, AACT, and HBD). Under receiver-operating characteristic analysis, this panel discriminated MRONJ with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 78.9%. CONCLUSION: These findings may inform a novel biomarker panel for MRONJ prediction or diagnosis. Nonetheless, further research is needed to validate this panel.

Awareness and Attitude among Physicians Regarding Bisphosphonaterelated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ): A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: An invasive dental procedure is considered one of the risk factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw, especially among patients on bisphosphonates. This study aimed to determine the awareness and perceptions of medical practitioners regarding bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), and their attitude towards dental referrals of such patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among medical practitioners in and around Mysore city, Karnataka, India, who commonly prescribe bisphosphonates. The sample included orthopaedic doctors, physicians, endocrinologists, and oncologists, divided based on the duration of practice and speciality. Data on the type of practice, awareness of BRONJ, referral to a dentist before/during therapy, and patient education about adverse effects, were collected and analyzed. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among 58 practitioners, 84.5% (49) were aware of the association between bisphosphonates and BRONJ, while 56.9% (33/58) believed dental procedure to be a risk factor, and 55.2% (32/58) did not recommend screening of the oral cavity by a dentist before initiation of bisphosphonate therapy. A majority (65.5%) of them educated their patients about adverse effects. Mean knowledge scores varied with specialization (post-graduation vs. super specialization = 1.43 vs. 2; p = 0.01) but not with the duration of practice (<= 10 years vs. >10 years= 1.57 vs. 1.4; p= 0.24). CONCLUSION: The practitioners in our study were oblivious to dental procedures' role in the osteonecrosis of the jaw, highlighting the need for continuing education programs regarding BRONJ for medical and dental professionals. Clinicians updated regarding evidence-based practices and working cooperatively in teams may reduce the incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

[Therapeutic alternatives for drug-associated maxillary osteonecrosis (MRONJ): reports of two clinical cases and review of the literature]. / Alternativas terapéuticas de osteonecrosis maxilar asociada a medicamentos (ONMAM): reportes de dos casos clínicos y revisión de la literatura.

Introduction: Drug-associated Maxillary Osteonecrosis is one of the most relevant adverse effects in treatment with antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates and denosumab. Oncological conditions such as multiple myeloma, breast cancer, prostate, and bone-metabolic disorders such as osteoporosis lead the indications for these antiresorptive therapies. Treatment is complex because the disease is often refractory. Pharmacological, conservative and surgical treatments are described. Objective: The aim of this study is to report two clinical cases of MRONJ treated with two different therapeutic protocols and the analysis of the available literature on these aspects based on the clinical classification defined by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS). Conclusion: Patients who develop clinical signs of great morbidity associated with MRONJ, may see their quality of life conditioned and suffer a worsening of their underlying pathology. MRONJ treatment is conditioned by the stage of the disease, its success depends on interdisciplinary management and strict medical and dental clinical follow-up, as well as rigorous monitoring to prevent or detect future recurrences early.

Introducción: La Osteonecrosis Maxilar asociada a Medicamentos (ONMAM) constituye uno de los efectos adversos más relevantes en el tratamiento con drogas antirresortivas como bifosfonatos y denosumab. Patologías oncológicas como mieloma múltiple, cáncer de mama, próstata, y alteraciones óseas-metabólicas como la osteoporosis lideran las indicaciones para estas terapias antirresortivas. El tratamiento es complejo debido a que muchas veces, la enfermedad es refractaria a la terapéutica aplicada. Se describen tratamientos farmacológicos, conservadores y quirúrgicos. Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es reportar dos casos clínicos de ONMAM tratados con dos protocolos terapéuticos diferentes y el análisis de la literatura disponible en la actualidad sobre estos aspectos en base a la clasificación clínica definida por la American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS). Conclusión: Los pacientes que desarrollan cuadros clínicos bucales de gran morbilidad como lo es ONMAM, pueden ver condicionada su calidad de vida y sufrir un agravamiento de su patología de base. El tratamiento de ONMAM está condicionado al estadio de la enfermedad, el éxito del mismo depende del manejo interdisciplinario y de un estricto seguimiento clínico médico y odontológico, así como también un riguroso monitoreo para evitar o detectar precozmente futuras recurrencias.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw in primary dental care: Recognition and referral.

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) are uncommon conditions, however when present they have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life and are notoriously difficult to treat. With medical advances resulting in improved survival rates and increased life expectancy, it is likely that general dental practitioners (GDPs) will more frequently be involved in the oral health management of patients at risk of both ORN and MRONJ. Though management of both diseases is beyond the scope of primary care dentistry, the GDP still has a key role in the patient's overall care. It is therefore important to have a good understanding of these conditions and their consequences for dental treatment in order to provide adequate patient support. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and as part of this GDPs are integral in prevention, early recognition and maintenance of oral health following diagnosis. This article aims to refresh the reader's knowledge regarding MRONJ and ORN and support the GDP in managing this patient group.

Idiopathic lingual mandibular sequestration and its relationship to medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ): mini review.

OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic lingual mandibular sequestration is an uncommon condition that affects the lingual aspect of the mandible and may result in a necrosis of the jaw that is clinically indistinguishable from medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. This condition, however, is not associated with the intake of antiresorptive medication and may not require the same safeguards for extended periods of time. The etiology of idiopathic lingual mandibular sequestration is still unknown although trauma has been shown to play an important role. METHOD AND MATERIALS: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were used to retrieve papers written in English through the years 1970 to 2021 using the key words "idiopathic osteonecrosis," "lingual sequestration," and "idiopathic jaw sequestration." In addition, clinical presentation of the lesion was included. RESULTS: Idiopathic lingual mandibular sequestration is a benign, mostly self-limiting condition distinct from medication- related osteonecrosis of the jaw. CONCLUSION: The dental clinician should be familiar with this condition and include it in their differential diagnosis when exposed bone is present with no history of radiation to the area or intake of antiresorptive medication. The course of the condition is usually very mild and may be self-limiting and usually does not require surgical intervention.