Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 57(3): 254-263, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28535898

RESUMO

Bisphosphonates are considered first-line agents in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis based on extensive experience of use, safety, and proven efficacy in reducing vertebral, non-vertebral and femur fractures. However, post-marketing reports based on the treatment of millions of patients/year over lengthy periods of time have revealed the occurrence of initially unexpected adverse effects, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture, leading to the restriction of treatment duration with bisphosphonates by global regulatory agencies. However, despite the association between these effects and bisphosphonates, this risk should be analyzed in the context of osteoporosis treatment, alongside the benefit of preventing osteoporotic fractures and their clinical consequences. Therefore, we consider it plausible to discuss the restriction to the use of bisphosphonates, possible indications for prolonged treatment and alternative therapies following the suspension of this drug class for patients with persistent high risk of fracture after initial treatment, especially considering the problems of public health funding in Brazil and the shortage of drugs provided by the government. Thus, to standardize the treatment of osteoporosis in the public health care system, we aim to develop a proposal for a scientifically-based pharmacological treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, establishing criteria for indication and allowing the rational use of each pharmacological agent. We discuss the duration of the initial bisphosphonate treatment, the therapeutic options for refractory patients and potential indications of other classes of drugs as first-choice treatment in the sphere of public health, in which assessing risk and cost effectiveness is a priority.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Algoritmos , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/economia , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/prevenção & controle , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício , Difosfonatos/economia , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco
2.
Rev. bras. reumatol ; 57(3): 254-263, May-June 2017. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-899421

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Bisphosphonates are considered first-line agents in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis based on extensive experience of use, safety, and proven efficacy in reducing vertebral, non-vertebral and femur fractures. However, post-marketing reports based on the treatment of millions of patients/year over lengthy periods of time have revealed the occurrence of initially unexpected adverse effects, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture, leading to the restriction of treatment duration with bisphosphonates by global regulatory agencies. However, despite the association between these effects and bisphosphonates, this risk should be analyzed in the context of osteoporosis treatment, alongside the benefit of preventing osteoporotic fractures and their clinical consequences. Therefore, we consider it plausible to discuss the restriction to the use of bisphosphonates, possible indications for prolonged treatment and alternative therapies following the suspension of this drug class for patients with persistent high risk of fracture after initial treatment, especially considering the problems of public health funding in Brazil and the shortage of drugs provided by the government. Thus, to standardize the treatment of osteoporosis in the public health care system, we aim to develop a proposal for a scientifically-based pharmacological treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, establishing criteria for indication and allowing the rational use of each pharmacological agent. We discuss the duration of the initial bisphosphonate treatment, the therapeutic options for refractory patients and potential indications of other classes of drugs as first-choice treatment in the sphere of public health, in which assessing risk and cost effectiveness is a priority.


RESUMO Com base na vasta experiência de uso, segurança e eficácia comprovada na redução de fraturas vertebrais, não vertebrais e femorais, os bisfosfonatos são considerados agentes de primeira linha no tratamento da osteoporose pós-menopáusica. No entanto, os relatos pós-venda baseados no tratamento de milhões de pacientes/ano durante períodos prolongados de tempo revelaram a ocorrência de efeitos adversos inicialmente inesperados, como osteonecrose da mandíbula e fratura atípica do fêmur. Isso levou as agências reguladoras globais a restringirem a duração do tratamento com bisfosfonatos. No entanto, apesar da associação entre esses efeitos e os bisfosfonatos, esse risco deve ser analisado no contexto do tratamento da osteoporose, paralelamente ao benefício na prevenção de fraturas osteoporóticas e suas consequências clínicas. Portanto, considera-se plausível discutir a restrição ao uso dos bisfosfonatos, possíveis indicações para o tratamento prolongado e terapias opcionais após a suspensão dessa classe de fármaco para pacientes com alto risco persistente de fratura após o tratamento inicial, especialmente se considerarmos os problemas financeiros de saúde pública no Brasil e a escassez de fármacos fornecidos pelo governo. Assim, para padronizar o tratamento da osteoporose no sistema público de saúde pretende-se desenvolver uma proposta de tratamento farmacológico cientificamente fundamentada para a osteoporose pós-menopáusica, estabelecer critérios de indicação e permitir o uso racional de cada agente farmacológico. Discutem-se a duração do tratamento inicial com bisfosfonatos, as opções terapêuticas para pacientes refratários e potenciais indicações de outras classes de medicamentos como tratamento de primeira linha na esfera da saúde pública, em que a avaliação do risco e custo-efetividade é uma prioridade.


Assuntos
Humanos , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Algoritmos , Brasil , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/economia , Fatores de Risco , Análise Custo-Benefício , Difosfonatos/economia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/economia , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/prevenção & controle , Programas Nacionais de Saúde
3.
Oral Dis ; 23(2): 141-151, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27062390

RESUMO

Osteonecrosis of the jaw may be caused by radiation, medication, or infection. Optimal therapy requires a multimodal approach that combines surgery with adjuvant treatments. This review focuses on the use of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for this condition. In addition to evidence regarding the basic and clinical science behind hyperbaric oxygen therapy, controversies in the field and economic implications are discussed.


Assuntos
Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Arcada Osseodentária , Osteorradionecrose/terapia , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/economia , Humanos , Osteonecrose/etiologia , Osteonecrose/terapia , Osteorradionecrose/economia
4.
Oral Dis ; 20(1): 94-9, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23419136

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (BONJ) is an emerging oral complication that occurs most commonly in the setting of high-dose bisphosphonate therapy for cancer. The purpose of this study was to estimate the health care-related costs associated with a diagnosis of BONJ in patients with cancer evaluated and managed at one tertiary oral medicine practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective electronic medical record review of cancer patients with BONJ. All health care-related resources were abstracted using a structured chart abstraction tool; data captured included medications, imaging studies, laboratory investigations, procedures, and visits. Standardized references were used to assign costs in 2010 US dollars. RESULTS: Ninety-two cancer patients with BONJ were identified who were followed for a median of 12 months. The median cost of a case of BONJ was $1667 (interquartile range from $976 to $3350). Medication costs comprised the majority (42%) of the total costs, followed by procedural interventions (22%), clinic visits (19.5%), and imaging studies (13.8%). Patient factors associated with higher median costs included a greater number of involved oral quadrants and more advanced BONJ stage. CONCLUSION: There are considerable costs associated with the diagnosis and management of BONJ in patients with cancer, with medications accounting for nearly half of resource expenditures.


Assuntos
Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/economia , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/etiologia , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...