Comprehensive Audiologic Analyses After Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.

Importance: Cisplatin is highly ototoxic but widely used. Evidence is lacking regarding cisplatin-related hearing loss (CRHL) in adult-onset cancer survivors with comprehensive audiologic assessments (eg, Words-in-Noise [WIN] tests, full-spectrum audiometry, and additional otologic measures), as well as the progression of CRHL considering comorbidities, modifiable factors associated with risk, and cumulative cisplatin dose. Objective: To assess CRHL with comprehensive audiologic assessments, including the WIN, evaluate the longitudinal progression of CRHL, and identify factors associated with risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Platinum Study is a longitudinal study of cisplatin-treated testicular cancer survivors (TCS) enrolled from 2012 to 2018 with follow-up ongoing. Longitudinal comprehensive audiologic assessments at Indiana University and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center included 100 participants without audiometrically defined profound hearing loss (HL) at baseline and at least 3.5 years from their first audiologic assessment. Data were analyzed from December 2013 to December 2022. Exposures: Factors associated with risk included cumulative cisplatin dose, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, tobacco use, physical inactivity, body mass index, family history of HL, cognitive dysfunction, psychosocial symptoms, and tinnitus. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were audiometrically measured HL defined as combined-ears high-frequency pure-tone average (4-12 kHz) and speech-recognition in noise performance measured with WIN. Multivariable analyses evaluated factors associated with risk for WIN scores and progression of audiometrically defined HL. Results: Median (range) age of 100 participants at evaluation was 48 (25-67) years; median (range) time since chemotherapy: 14 (4-31) years. At follow-up, 78 (78%) TCS had audiometrically defined HL; those self-reporting HL had 2-fold worse hearing than TCS without self-reported HL (48 vs 24 dB HL; P < .001). A total of 54 (54%) patients with self-reported HL showed clinically significant functional impairment on WIN testing. Poorer WIN performance was associated with hypercholesterolemia (ß = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.69; P = .03), lower-education (F1 = 5.95; P = .004), and severity of audiometrically defined HL (ß̂ = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.09; P < .001). CRHL progression was associated with hypercholesterolemia (ß̂ = -4.38; 95% CI, -7.42 to -1.34; P = .01) and increasing age (ß̂ = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.50; P < .001). Importantly, relative to age-matched male normative data, audiometrically defined CRHL progression significantly interacted with cumulative cisplatin dose (F1 = 5.98; P = .02); patients given 300 mg/m2 or less experienced significantly less progression, whereas greater temporal progression followed doses greater than 300 mg/m2. Conclusions and Relevance: Follow-up of cisplatin-treated cancer survivors should include strict hypercholesterolemia control and regular audiological assessments. Risk stratification through validated instruments should include querying hearing concerns. CRHL progression relative to age-matched norms is likely associated with cumulative cisplatin dose; investigation over longer follow-up is warranted.

Risk factors associated with ototoxicity in long-term nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors.

PURPOSE: To investigate patient-reported outcomes among long-term survivors and to analyze their associated risk factors to provide better treatment and symptom management for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study collected patients diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy in our hospital from June 2009 to June 2016. The patients' disease status and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed by follow-up. The ototoxicity was graded according to CTCAE 5.0. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were included in the study. Among the enrolled patients, the median follow-up time was 8.4 (6.0-13.0) years. Based on the patient-reported outcomes, ototoxicity was the most common symptom (52.9 %). After univariable and multivariable logistic regression, age ≥ 50 years old (OR, 4.066; 95 % CI, 1.799-9.190; P = .001), diabetes (OR, 3.520; 95 % CI, 1.442-8.591; P = .006), D2 ≥ 69 Gy (OR, 3.715; 95 % CI, 1.064-12.969; P = . 040) and V35 ≥ 91.5 % (OR, 3.398; 95 % CI, 1.113-10.372; P = .032) were associated with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 ototoxicity. Then, we constructed the individual nomogram and the C index of the graph was 0.815. By univariable logistic regression, we found that grade 3-4 ototoxicity was associated with an increased risk of multiple other symptoms, dysmasesia, tongue dysfunction, hoarseness, dysphagia and ocular toxicity. CONCLUSION: In long-term survivors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving IMRT, the most common patient-reported outcome was ototoxicity. Age ≥ 50 years, diabetes, ear exposure dose of D2 ≥ 69 Gy and V35 ≥ 91.5 % are independent risk factors for grade 3-4 ototoxicity.

Establishing multifactorial risk factors for adult-onset hearing loss: A systematic review with topic modelling and synthesis of epidemiological evidence.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review explores the multifaceted nature of risk factors contributing to adult-onset HL. The objective was to synthesise the most recent epidemiological evidence to generate pooled proportional incidences for the identified risk factors. METHODS: We conducted an extensive search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and psychINFO) for studies providing epidemiological evidence of risk factors associated with hearing loss. Topic modelling using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was first conducted to determine how many risk factor themes were available from the papers. Data were analysed by calculating the pooled proportional incidence using a meta-analysis of proportions. RESULTS: From the 72 studies reviewed, six key risk factor themes emerged through LDA topic modelling. The review identified ototoxicity, primarily caused by cancer treatments and antibiotics, infectious diseases like COVID-19, occupational noise exposure, lifestyle factors, health conditions, biological responses, and age progression as significant risk factors for HL. The highest proportional incidence was found with cancer-related ototoxicity at 55.4% (95%CI: 39.0-70.7), followed closely by ototoxicity from infectious diseases at 50.0% (95%CI: 28.5-71.5). This high proportional incidence suggests the need to explore less destructive therapies and proactively monitor hearing function during treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review, combined with the synthesis of epidemiological evidence, enhance our understanding of hearing loss (HL) pathogenesis and highlight potential areas for intervention, thereby paving the way for more effective prevention and management of adult-onset hearing loss in our ageing global population.

Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity amongst cervical cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in south Africa.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using weekly cisplatin remains standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa. While cisplatin remains a popular cancer chemotherapeutic, it has an irreversible ototoxic effect on patients' auditory system. However, there is a paucity of epidemiological information on its extent and severity during cervical cancer treatment. In a region with a high burden of cervical cancer, this has serious consequences for aural intervention and rehabilitation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Using a prospective cohort study design, 82 patients with incident cervical cancer, receiving weekly cisplatin chemotherapy (50 mg/m2 body surface) at a tertiary level hospital in KwaZulu-Natal Province of South Africa, underwent audiological assessments at various intervals. We describe the temporal impact of cisplatin exposure on hearing loss, its combined effect with HIV-infection, and estimate ototoxicity incidence in this cohort. The median age was 52 years with Stages IIB (45%) and IIIB (35.4%) cancers being most common. Complaints of reduced hearing sensitivity increased significantly (p<0.0001). Bilateral, asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss, with greater effect in the extended high-frequency range, was evident. Cisplatin dosage was significantly associated with ototoxicity severity at one- (p = 0.017), three- (p = 0.010), and six-month (p = 0.015) post-treatment follow-up. HIV-seropositivity (53.7%) was significantly associated with NCI-CTCAE Grading Scale at three- (p = 0.022) and six-months (p = 0.023) post-treatment. Multiple Tobit regression revealed a cumulative dose effect bilaterally, after adjustment for age and HIV status, evident from 9000Hz and above in the right ear, while a plateau effect was observed at 250mg/m2 in the left ear. The incidence was ototoxicity was 98% at a cumulative dose of 150mg/m2. CONCLUSION: The findings of this epidemiologic study highlight the temporal course and severity of ototoxicity experienced by cervical cancer patients treated with cisplatin, with greater impact in HIV-positive subgroup, thus underscores the need for audiological monitoring and timely interventions in this cohort.

Ototoxicity and long-term hearing outcome in pediatric patients receiving cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Hearing is essential in child development. Cisplatin which is a common chemotherapy used in many pediatric solid-tumor protocols cause various degrees of ototoxicity. Several risk factors for cisplatininduced ototoxicity have been reported, including race and age. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of ototoxicity and its long-term outcome in Thai pediatric solid-tumor patients receiving cisplatin and to determine the risk factors associated with hearing impairment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in solid-tumor patients < 15 years old from 2007 to 2019 at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Hearing was evaluated by an audiogram and/or auditory steady-state response and the impairment was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5. Grade 2 and above was considered significant hearing loss. RESULTS: In total, the hearing of 47 patients was evaluated. At the end of treatment, hearing impairment and significant hearing loss were found in 66% and 48.9% of patients, respectively. A high median cumulative cisplatin dose was significantly associated with worse hearing impairment (p = 0.039) and a more progressive grading of ototoxicity (p = 0.005). A risk factor for significant hearing loss was a cumulative dose ≥400 mg/m2 (p = 0.014). All 9 patients who received a cumulative dose > 600 mg/m2 and 5 patients who received aminoglycoside developed significant hearing loss. One patient had progressive hearing impairment at 8 months after the end of treatment and 1 patient developed grade 3 ototoxicity which required a hearing aid after bone marrow transplantation. The latter patient received a total cisplatin dose of 708.2 mg/m < sup > 2 < /sup > and carboplatin 1400 mg/m < sup > 2 < /sup > . CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hearing impairment in pediatric patients receiving cisplatin is high. Regular hearing evaluation is essential for the early detection of ototoxicity. Long-term follow-up is recommended, especially in patients who have a combination of other risk factors for hearing loss.

Global burden of ototoxic hearing loss associated with platinum-based cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents cisplatin and carboplatin are widely used in cancer treatment worldwide and may result in ototoxic hearing loss. The high incidence of cancer and salient ototoxic effects of platinum-based compounds pose a global public health threat. The purpose of this study was twofold. First, to estimate the prevalence of ototoxic hearing loss associated with treatment with cisplatin and/or carboplatin via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Second, to estimate the annual global burden of ototoxic hearing loss associated with exposure to cisplatin and/or carboplatin. For the systematic review, three databases were searched (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection) and studies that reported prevalence of objectively measured ototoxic hearing loss in cancer patients were included. A random effects meta-analysis determined pooled prevalence (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of ototoxic hearing loss overall, and estimates were stratified by treatment and patient attributes. Estimates of ototoxic hearing loss burden were created with published global estimates of incident cancers often treated with platinum-based compounds and cancer-specific treatment rates. Eighty-seven records (n = 5077 individuals) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence of ototoxic hearing loss associated with cisplatin and/or carboplatin exposure was 43.17% [CI 37.93-48.56%]. Prevalence estimates were higher for regimens involving cisplatin (cisplatin only: 49.21% [CI 42.62-55.82%]; cisplatin & carboplatin: 56.05% [CI 45.12-66.43%]) versus carboplatin only (13.47% [CI 8.68-20.32%]). Our crude estimates of burden indicated approximately one million individuals worldwide are likely exposed to cisplatin and/or carboplatin, which would result in almost half a million cases of hearing loss per year, globally. There is an urgent need to reduce impacts of ototoxicity in cancer patients. This can be partially achieved by implementing existing strategies focused on primary, secondary, and tertiary hearing loss prevention. Primary ototoxicity prevention via otoprotectants should be a research and policy priority.

Detection of unknown ototoxic adverse drug reactions: an electronic healthcare record-based longitudinal nationwide cohort analysis.

Ototoxic medications can lead to significant morbidity. Thus, pre-marketing clinical trials have assessed new drugs that have ototoxic potential. Nevertheless, several ototoxic side effects of drugs may remain undetected. Hence, we sought to retrospectively investigate the potential risk of ototoxic adverse drug reactions among commonly used drugs via a longitudinal cohort study. An electronic health records-based data analysis with a propensity-matched comparator group was carried out. This study was conducted using the MetaNurse algorithm for standard nursing statements on electronic healthcare records and the National Sample Cohort obtained from the South Korea National Health Insurance Service. Five target drugs capable of causing ototoxic adverse drug reactions were identified using MetaNurse; two drugs were excluded after database-based analysis because of the absence of bilateral hearing loss events in patients. Survival analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate the incidence, survival rate, and hazard ratio of bilateral hearing loss among patients who were prescribed candidate ototoxic drugs. The adjusted hazard ratio of bilateral hearing loss was 1.31 (1.03-1.68), 2.20 (1.05-4.60), and 2.26 (1.18-4.33) in cimetidine, hydroxyzine, and sucralfate users, respectively. Our results indicated that hydroxyzine and sucralfate may cause ototoxic adverse drug reactions in patients. Thus, clinicians should consider avoiding co-administration of these drugs with other well-confirmed ototoxic drugs should be emphasized.

Prevalence and risk factors for cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children, adolescents, and young adults: a multi-institutional North American cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is used to treat a wide range of childhood cancers and cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is a common and debilitating toxicity. We aimed to address persistent knowledge gaps in CIHL by establishing benchmarks for the prevalence of and risk factors for CIHL. METHODS: In this multi-institutional cohort study, children (age 0-14 years), adolescents, and young adults (age 15-39 years) diagnosed with a cisplatin-treated tumour from paediatric cancer centres, who had available cisplatin dosing information, and primary audiology data for central review from consortia located in Canada and the USA were eligible for inclusion. Audiology was centrally reviewed and CIHL graded using the consensus International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) Boston Ototoxicity Scale. We assessed the prevalence of moderate or severe CIHL (SIOP grade ≥2) at latest follow-up and end of therapy, in each demographic, diagnosis, and treatment group and their relative contributions to risk for CIHL. Secondary endpoints explored associations of cisplatin dose reductions and CIHL with survival. We also examined whether cisplatin dose reductions and CIHL were associated with survival outcomes. FINDINGS: We included 1481 patients who received cisplatin. Of the 1414 (95·5%) participants who had audiometry at latest follow-up (mean 3·9 years [SD 4·2] since diagnosis), 620 (43·8%) patients developed moderate or severe CIHL. The highest prevalence of CIHL was seen in the youngest patients (aged <5 years; 360 [59·4%] of 606 patients) and those with a CNS tumour (221 [50·9%] of 434 patients), hepatoblastoma (110 [65·9%] of 167 patients), or neuroblastoma (154 [62·1%] of 248 patients). After accounting for cumulative cisplatin dose, higher fractionated doses were associated with risk for CIHL (for each 10mg/m2 increase per day, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·15 [95% CI 1·07-1·25]; for each 50 mg/m2 increase per cycle aOR 2·16 [1·37-3·51]). Vincristine exposure was newly identified as a risk factor for CIHL (aOR 3·55 [2·19-5·84]). Dose reductions and moderate or severe CIHL were not significantly associated with survival differences. INTERPRETATION: Using this large, multicentre cohort, benchmarks were established for the prevalence of CIHL in patients treated with cisplatin. Variations in cisplatin dosing confer additive risk for developing CIHL and warrant investigation as a potential approach to decrease the burden of therapy. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health and National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, US National Institutes of Health and National Cancer institute, St Baldrick's Foundation, Genome Canada, Genome British Columbia, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, University of British Columbia, British Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, British Columbia Provincial Health Services Authority, Health Canada, and C17 Research Network.

Atorvastatin is associated with reduced cisplatin-induced hearing loss.

BACKGROUNDCisplatin is widely used to treat adult and pediatric cancers. It is the most ototoxic drug in clinical use, resulting in permanent hearing loss in approximately 50% of treated patients. There is a major need for therapies that prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Studies in mice suggest that concurrent use of statins reduces cisplatin-induced hearing loss.METHODSWe examined hearing thresholds from 277 adults treated with cisplatin for head and neck cancer. Pretreatment and posttreatment audiograms were collected within 90 days of initiation and completion of cisplatin therapy. The primary outcome measure was a change in hearing as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).RESULTSAmong patients on concurrent atorvastatin, 9.7% experienced a CTCAE grade 2 or higher cisplatin-induced hearing loss compared with 29.4% in nonstatin users (P < 0.0001). A mixed-effect model analysis showed that atorvastatin use was significantly associated with reduced cisplatin-induced hearing loss (P ≤ 0.01). An adjusted odds ratio (OR) analysis indicated that an atorvastatin user is 53% less likely to acquire a cisplatin-induced hearing loss than a nonstatin user (OR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.78). Three-year survival rates were not different between atorvastatin users and nonstatin users (P > 0.05).CONCLUSIONSOur data indicate that atorvastatin use is associated with reduced incidence and severity of cisplatin-induced hearing loss in adults being treated for head and neck cancer.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03225157.FUNDINGFunding was provided by the Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (1 ZIA DC000079, ZIA DC000090).

Opioid-Associated Hearing Loss: A 20-Year Review from the New Jersey Poison Center.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-associated ototoxicity is a known complication of opioid exposure, although the mechanism remains unclear. While historically most closely linked to heroin and oxycodone, evolving reports suggest that it may be a class effect of opioids. However, the evidence is limited to case reports. METHODS: A retrospective review of the New Jersey Poison Center records (ToxiCALL®) identified cases that included both hearing loss and recent opioid exposure between January 1, 1999, and September 21, 2018. RESULTS: Forty-one cases were identified, mean age 29.4 years, 51% (n = 21) were male. Reported heroin exposures comprised 51% (n = 22), 18 of which were heroin alone. The next most commonly cited opioids were oxycodone (n = 7), methadone, (n = 4), and tramadol (n = 3). Hearing loss was described as tinnitus in 24% of cases, hypoacusis in 37% of cases, deafness in 29% of cases, and mixed tinnitus/hypoacusis in 10% of cases. Only 34% (n = 14) of cases were associated with a potential hypoxic event. Of the cases that documented resolution data, 21% (n = 4 of 19) reported no improvement at time of hospital discharge. DISCUSSION: Opioid-associated ototoxicity appears to be a hypoxia-independent adverse effect since most of the reported cases did not involve a known contributory hypoxic event. It occurs with a wide array of opioids, which supports an opioid receptor-mediated mechanism. The ototoxic effect may be self-limited in many patients. CONCLUSION: Opioid-associated ototoxicity was most commonly associated with heroin exposure and appeared independent of hypoxic events. Further investigation that clarifies the risk factors and long-term outcomes is needed.

Ear and labyrinth toxicities induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis from 2014 to 2019.

Aim: We aimed to systematically characterize ear and labyrinth toxicities after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) initiation. Materials & methods: Data were extracted from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Disproportionality analysis including information component and reporting odds ratio (ROR) was performed to access potential signals. Results: In FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database, 284 records for ICIs-associated ear/labyrinth adverse events (AEs) were involved. In general, there was no significant association between total ICIs use and total ear and labyrinth AEs (ROR025: 0.576). However, in ICIs monotherapy and polytherapy groups, signals were detected in several specific ear and labyrinth AEs. Conclusion: Total ear and labyrinth toxicities were not significantly reported with ICI immunotherapy, while class-specific ear toxicities were detected in some strategies.

[Kanamycin-induced ototoxicity during treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis]. / Ototoxicité liée à la kanamycine au cours du traitement de la tuberculose multirésistante.

INTRODUCTION: Aminoglycosides are commonly used in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Their use can cause ototoxicity with irreversible hearing loss. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and to identify factors associated to kanamycin-induced ototoxicity during MDR-TB treatment in Yaounde. METHODS: The records of patients hospitalized in the pulmonology department of the Jamot Hospital of Yaounde between May 2008 and July 2015 (7 years) for treatment of MDR-TB with regimens containing kanamycin were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify for factors associated with ototoxicity during this treatment. RESULTS: Of the 79 patients included, 60.7% were male and their median age (25th-75th percentile) was 31 (25-43) years. Eighteen (22.8%) patients had HIV infection. During treatment, the incidence of kanamycin-induced ototoxicity [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] was 36.7 (26.9-47.7) %. Factors independently associated with this ototoxicity [odds ratio (95% CI)] during MDR-TB treatment were age>40 years [13.47 (3.66-49.49)] and a body mass index<18.5kg/m2 [4.58 (1.36-15.44)]. CONCLUSION: The incidence of kanamycin-induced ototoxicity during MDR-TB treatment is relatively high. Taking these factors into consideration at the initiation of MDR-TB treatment would allow to reduce the occurrence of irreversible functional impairment induced by the treatment of MDR-TB.

The estimated prevalence of exposure to carcinogens, asthmagens, and ototoxic agents among healthcare workers in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers are occupationally exposed to various hazardous chemicals and agents that can potentially result in long-term adverse health effects. These exposures have not been comprehensively examined at a population level. The aim of this study was to examine occupational exposures to a wide range of asthmagens, carcinogens, and ototoxic agents among healthcare workers in Australia. METHODS: Data were collected as part of the Australian Work Exposures Studies, which were computer-assisted telephone surveys conducted in 2011, 2014, and 2016 to assess the prevalence of occupational exposures to carcinogens, asthmagens, and ototoxic agents, respectively, among Australian workers. Using data on healthcare workers, the prevalence of exposures to these agents was calculated and associations of demographic variables and occupation groups with exposure status were examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of exposure to at least one asthmagen, carcinogen, and ototoxic agent was 92.3%, 50.7%, and 44.6%, respectively. The most common exposures were to (a) cleaning and sterilizing agents in the asthmagen group; (b) shift work in the carcinogen group; and (c) toluene and p-xylene among ototoxic agents. Exposure varied by occupation, with exposure to carcinogens and ototoxic agents highest among personal carers and exposure to carcinogens most likely among nursing professionals and health and welfare support workers. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that a substantial proportion of Australian healthcare workers are occupationally exposed to asthmagens, carcinogens, and ototoxic agents. These exposures are more common among certain occupational groups. The information provided by this study will be useful in prioritizing and implementing control strategies.

The Relationship Between Cisplatin-related and Age-related Hearing Loss During an Extended Follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Cisplatin-related hearing loss (HL) is claimed to progress after treatment. This controlled longitudinal study with extended follow-up investigates HL in testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) after cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CBCT). STUDY DESIGN: Controlled longitudinal study. METHODS: Eighty-two TCSs treated with CBCT between 1980 and 1994 in Norway participated in two surveys (S1/S3), including pure-tone audiograms (0.125-8 kHz) and self-reported HL, 12 and 31 years after treatment, respectively. Hearing thresholds were age-adjusted based on age-matched hearing thresholds from the general population (controls). Hearing loss was defined as thresholds >20 dB at any frequency. RESULTS: Between the two surveys, the prevalence of high-frequency HL (4, 6, and 8 kHz) increased from 73% to 94% but approached those of the aging general population after age adjustment. In TCSs aged >40 years at first survey, HL at the subsequent survey equaled that of controls. Self-reported HL increased from seven (9%) at S1 to 20 (26%) at S3. At S1, age-adjusted HL was identified in all (seven) TCSs reporting decreased hearing whereas at S3, hearing thresholds did not differ from controls in seven out of 20 patients reporting HL. CONCLUSION: CBCT-related ototoxicity causes high-frequency HL, but in contrast to reports from follow-up studies from the first post-treatment decade, no major progression was found beyond the first post-treatment decade for frequencies 0.125-8 kHz. Importantly, with extended follow-up, hearing thresholds of patients approach those of the general population, possibly due to a less-than-additive effect with age-related hearing loss (ARHL) in CBCT-treated patients. Age-and sex-matching is strongly advised in long-term follow-up of CBCT-related ototoxicity. Specificity for detecting ototoxicity with self-reported questionnaires decreases with extended follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 130:E515-E523, 2020.

Otomycosis With Tympanic Membrane Perforation: A Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to assess the rate of tympanic membrane perforation in patients with otomycosis and to discuss the literature regarding the difficulties in managing this condition. DATA SOURCES: Literature review from 1999 to 2019, Web of Science, PubMed, and Medline. STUDY SELECTION: We searched for eligible articles concerning the clinical entity of tympanic membrane perforation secondary to otomycosis. Case series and clinical trials were the types of articles included for this review. DATA EXTRACTION: All the articles described in the study selection were used for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Statistical techniques were not used. CONCLUSION: Based on the available literature, it seems that tympanic membrane perforation secondary to otomycosis is not uncommon. The presence of this complication is associated with 2 problems: Antimycotic solutions are irritant to middle ear and may be ototoxic to the cochlea. Although most cases of fungus caused tympanic membrane (TM) perforation resolve with proper medical treatment, in a few patients a tympanoplasty may be required.

Prevalence of Ototoxicity Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients.

The use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is increasing for a variety of diseases. Ototoxicity from this procedure has not been extensively studied. A retrospective chart review examined 275 patients from this institution who underwent HSCT between January 1, 2007, and April 30, 2017. Data extracted included therapy before HSCT and the subsequent course of transplantation. Evaluable patients had complete medical records and interpretable audiograms available. Ototoxicity constituted significant threshold changes from baseline or changes in International Society of Pediatric Oncology/Boston Ototoxicity Grading Scale (SIOP) grade comparing audiogram results just before HSCT with those following the transplantation procedure. A total of 147 patients were evaluable. Ototoxicity was observed in 10.2% of the patients. Higher SIOP grade before HSCT was significantly associated with a higher risk of post-transplantation ototoxicity (P < .01). Previous cisplatin treatment (P < .0001), but not carboplatin or radiation treatment, was also associated with ototoxicity. Patients with a solid tumor or brain tumor (P < .0001) and those who received an autologous transplant (P = .0002) were also at increased risk. No post-transplantation event was significantly associated with ototoxicity. Ototoxicity affects a significant percentage of patients undergoing HSCT, and careful monitoring is needed to identify patients impacted by this procedure.

Genetic variation of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in non-cranial-irradiated pediatric patients using a candidate gene approach: The International PanCareLIFE Study.

Ototoxicity is a common side effect of platinum treatment and manifests as irreversible, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Genetic association studies have suggested a role for SNPs in genes related to the disposition of cisplatin or deafness. In this study, 429 pediatric patients that were treated with cisplatin were genotyped for 10 candidate SNPs. Logistic regression analyses revealed that younger age at treatment (≤5 years vs >15 years: OR: 9.1; 95% CI: 3.8-21.5; P = 5.6 × 10-7) and higher cumulative dose of cisplatin (>450 vs ≤300 mg/m2: OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3-4.6; P = 0.007) confer a significant risk of ototoxicity. Of the SNPs investigated, none of them were significantly associated with an increase of ototoxicity. In the meta-analysis, ACYP2 rs1872328 (OR: 3.94; 95% CI: 1.04-14.03; P = 0.04) and SLC22A2 rs316019 (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.07-2.00; P = 0.02) were associated with ototoxicity. In order to increase the understanding of the association between SNPs and ototoxicity, we propose a polygenic model, which takes into account multiple interacting genes of the cisplatin pathway that together confer an increased risk of ototoxicity.

Pharmacokinetics and other risk factors for kanamycin-induced hearing loss in patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.

Objective: The toxicity associated with the use of kanamycin includes irreversible hearing loss. There are limited data describing the relationship between hearing loss and kanamycin pharmacokinetics (PK). We explored the association of kanamycin PK with hearing loss in patients on MDR-TB treatment.Design: We prospectively recruited patients on kanamycin-based MDR-TB treatment in Cape Town. Hearing thresholds from 0.25 to 16 kHz were tested at baseline and at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. We determined kanamycin concentrations at steady-state in serial plasma samples over 10 h, and explored factors associated with hearing loss.Study sample: One hundred and two participants including 58 (56.9%) men had analysable audiometric data; median age was 34.9 years, 65 (63.7%) were HIV-positive, and 24 (23.5%) had been treated for MDR-TB previously.Results: Eighty-four participants (82.4%) developed hearing loss. We found a 3% (95% CI: 1-6%, p = 0.028) increased risk of cochleotoxicity for each 10 µg h/L increase in 0-10 h AUC.Conclusion: We describe a high incidence of hearing loss in MDR-TB patients treated with kanamycin, with higher AUC0-10 significantly associated with hearing loss.

Long-term vancomycin use had low risk of ototoxicity.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is a commonly used antibiotic with potent activity against Gram-positive organisms, but prolonged use and high doses can lead to toxicity. While vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity is widely reported, few cases of ototoxicity have been described. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of negative changes in audiograms in patients receiving long-term intravenous (IV) vancomycin and to identify high-risk patients who need audiogram monitoring. METHODS: This was an IRB approved, cross-sectional study performed at an academic medical center from 1/2012-3/2019. Patients who were prescribed IV vancomycin for ≥ 14 days and had baseline and follow-up weekly audiometry were included. All data was extracted from the electronic medical record. The primary endpoint was worsening audiogram while on vancomycin. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to describe the patient population. RESULTS: 424 patients were screened for inclusion; 92 received at least two audiograms while on vancomycin. Fifty-three percent of patients were men, the median (IQR) patient age was 44 (34-58) years, and 8% of patients had an estimated Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL/min or received hemodialysis. The median (IQR) vancomycin exposure up until the last recorded audiogram was 30 (17-42) days. Vancomycin indications were: 53 (58%) bone and joint infections, 17 (18%) infective endocarditis, 10 (11%) bacteremia, 12 (13%) other infections. Seven (8%) patients experienced a worsening change in hearing from baseline, two (2%) of them suffered mild loss, two (2%) had mild to moderate loss, and three (3%) developed moderate-to-severe hearing loss. In bivariate analyses, no variables were found to be associated with a worsening change in audiogram, including baseline abnormal audiogram, age ≥ 40 years, elevated serum vancomycin levels, or vancomycin doses ≥ 4 grams/day. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of negative changes in audiograms among patients receiving long-term intravenous vancomycin was low. The utility of routine audiogram testing in this population remains questionable except in high-risk patients; however, larger prospective studies with controls may be warranted to further explore the risk of ototoxicity.

Rates and risk factors for nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity among tuberculosis patients in Tbilisi, Georgia.

SETTING: Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is lengthy and utilizes second-line anti-TB drugs associated with frequent adverse drug reactions (ADRs).OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for ADRs among patients with MDR- and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB).DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of patients initiating treatment for M/XDR-TB in 2010-2012 in Tbilisi, Georgia.RESULTS: Eighty (54%) and 38 (26%) of 147 patients developed nephrotoxicity per RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease) classification and ototoxicity, respectively. Twenty-five (17%) patients required permanent interruption of injectables due to an ADR. Median hospital stay, total treatment duration and number of regimen changes were higher among those with nephrotoxicity and/or ototoxicity, compared to those without (P < 0.01). Multinomial logistic regression analysis identified increasing age (per year) as a risk factor for nephrotoxicity (aOR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.12) and for both, nephro- and ototoxicity (aOR 1.11, 95%CI 1.05-1.17). Low baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) was a significant risk factor for developing nephrotoxicity (aOR 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.07).CONCLUSION: Second-line injectable drug-related ADRs are common among M/XDR-TB patients. Patients with increasing age and low baseline CrCl should be monitored closely for injectable-related ADRs. Notably, our findings support WHO's latest recommendations on introduction of injectable free anti-TB treatment regimens.