Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with biodegradable ductal stenting (Archimedes BPS®).

BACKGROUND: Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF) development remains a challenge after pancreaticoduodenectomy, occurring in 3-45% of cases [1]. The placement of a trans-anastomotic Wirsung stent is usually done in high-risk patients to decrease incidence and severity of POPF. METHODS: Herein, we present a fully robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with a biodegradable ductal stent interposition in a 47 y.o. female with a main duct IPMN of the pancreatic head and a fistula risk score of 6 (Moderate-risk). VIDEO: After gastrocolic ligament division and hepatic flexure and duodenum mobilization, the loco-regional lymphadenectomy was performed. Following gastric transection with endo-GIA, the bile duct and gastroduodenal artery have been divided, and the cholecystectomy performed. The neck of the pancreas has been transected, the jejunum divided with endo-GIA and mobilized from the Treitz ligament, and the uncinate process dissected from the mesenteric vessels. A Blumgart anastomosis has been performed between the soft-texture pancreatic stump and the jejunal loop with the interposition of a 6 Fr/60 mm long, medium degrading stent (20 days) in the 2 mm duct (Archimedes BPS®, AMG Int., Winsen-Germany). The hepatico-jejunostomy and gastro-jejunostomy have been performed distally on the same loop. Three abdominal drains have been positioned. RESULTS: Surgery lasted 480 min, with 175 mls blood loss. The patient postoperatively developed a biochemical leak and was discharged home by day 12. She was readmitted a month later for an amylase-negative intra-abdominal abscess that was successfully treated with percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSION: Biodegradable pancreatic stent positioning could be an effective strategy in reducing POPF occurrence in high-risk patients.

Thunderbeat™ Integrated Bipolar and Ultrasonic Forceps in the Whipple Procedure: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Thunderbeat™ is a device that uses both ultrasonic and advanced bipolar energies to achieve hemostasis. It has been evaluated in a variety of clinical contexts, but no literature exists regarding its application to pancreatic surgery. Using a prospective, randomized controlled trial, we evaluated its safety and efficacy in the Whipple procedure. Thirty-two participants were enrolled in the study. The Thunderbeat™ device during the Whipple procedure showed similar safety profile compared to standard of care.

Use of an intraoperative wound protector to prevent surgical-site infection after pancreatoduodenectomy: randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infection (SSI) increases treatment costs, duration of hospital stay and readmission rate after pancreatic surgery. This study aimed to assess whether a wound protector could reduce the risk of superficial incisional SSI after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: This RCT included patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy at Verona University Hospital, between 2017 and 2018. The experimental group had a dual-ring wound protector, whereas the control group had standard surgical drapes. The groups were stratified by preoperative biliary stent placement. The primary outcome was the overall rate of superficial SSI. RESULTS: An interim analysis was conducted after 212 patients had been enrolled; 22 patients (10·4 per cent) were excluded owing to inability to complete the pancreatoduodenectomy, or the need for postoperative reintervention. Some 94 patients (49·5 per cent) had a wound protector and 96 (50·5 per cent) had standard drapes. There were no differences between groups in demographics, or in intraoperative findings, pathological data or surgical outcomes. The overall superficial SSI rate was 7·4 per cent, which did not differ between groups (7 per cent in each group; P = 0·585). Subanalysis of patients with a preoperative biliary stent showed a similar outcome (superficial SSI rate 9 versus 8 per cent with wound protector versus surgical drapes respectively; P = 0·536). The trial was stopped prematurely on the grounds of futility. CONCLUSION: Use of a wound protector did not reduce the rate of superficial SSI after pancreatoduodenectomy. Registration number: NCT03820648 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

ANTECEDENTES: La infección de la herida quirúrgica (surgical-site infection, SSI), especialmente de la incisión, aumenta sobremanera los costes del tratamiento, la duración de la estancia y la tasa de reingresos en la cirugía de páncreas. En los últimos años se han introducido los protectores de las heridas (wound protectors, WP) con la intención de reducir la tasa de SSI. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar si un WP podría reducir la incidencia de la SSI superficial de la incisión (superficial incisional surgical-site infection, SI-SSI) en pacientes sometidos a duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (pancreaticoduodenectomy, PD). MÉTODOS: Ensayo aleatorizado controlado en el que se incluyeron los pacientes a los que se realizó una PD en la Universidad de Verona entre 2017 y 2018. En el grupo experimental se utilizó un WP de doble anillo, mientras que el grupo control se utilizaron tallas quirúrgicas convencionales (standard drape, SD). Los grupos se estratificaron también según la colocación preoperatoria de una prótesis biliar. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 212 pacientes, de los que 22 (10%) abandonaron el estudio debido a la imposibilidad de realizar la DP o a la necesidad de una reintervención durante el curso postoperatorio. Los pacientes se dividieron en 94 (49%) en el grupo WP y 96 (51%) en el grupo SD. No se detectaron diferencias entre grupos en cuanto a las variables demográficas y a los resultados intraoperatorios, patológicos o quirúrgicos. La tasa global de SI-SSI fue del 7,4%, que no difirió entre los grupos (WP 7,5% versus SD 7,3%, P = 0,585). Teniendo en cuenta los resultados descritos, se cumplieron los criterios de futilidad del análisis y el ensayo se interrumpió prematuramente. CONCLUSIÓN: En el entorno de un centro de alto volumen, la WP por si sola no redujo la tasa de SI-SSI. Cabría plantear su utilización dentro de un programa multimodal, que debería incluir un replanteamiento interno de la institución encaminado a la reducción de complicaciones infecciosas.

Robotic Treatment for Large Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (D-GISTs) represent a rare entity.1 Surgery is the primary treatment choice for localized or potentially resectable D-GISTs. The main principle is the complete excision of the lesion with microscopically negative margins, without performing lymph node dissection.2 Nevertheless, the best surgical choice is still controversial since the strategy depends not only on the tumor size but also on its anatomic location.3,4 As a result, surgical management ranges from a major resection such as pancreaticoduodenectomy to more conservative procedures.5-8 This video presents a duodenal sparing robotic resection of a large GIST of the second-third duodenal portion. METHODS: A 49-year-old healthy female complained episodes of melena. Endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound identified a 6-cm lesion of the second-third portion of the duodenum with recent bleeding, arising from muscolaris propria. A computed tomography scan confirmed a large mass suspected to be a GIST without metastases or involvement of the ampulla of Vater. On the basis of these findings, after a multidisciplinary consultation, she was offered robotic surgery with a radical intent. RESULTS: A duodenal-sparing da Vinci®Si™ resection with robot-sewn primary duodenal closure was performed. After an uneventful postoperative course, the patient was discharged on post-operative day 7. Final pathology revealed a high-grade risk D-GIST with free margins: adjuvant Imatinib was recommended.9 At 4 years follow-up, no recurrence has been detected. CONCLUSIONS: A robotic approach might be considered in cases of large D-GISTs amenable to a conservative R0 surgery. This system provides several technical advantages that facilitate otherwise complex resection and reconstruction.10.

Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most severe complications after pancreatic surgeries. POPF develops as a consequence of pancreatic juice leakage from a surgically exfoliated surface and/or anastomotic stump, which sometimes cause intraperitoneal abscesses and subsequent lethal hemorrhage. In recent years, various surgical and perioperative attempts have been examined to reduce the incidence of POPF. We reviewed several well-designed studies addressing POPF-related factors, such as reconstruction methods, anastomotic techniques, stent usage, prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage, and somatostatin analogs, after pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, and we assessed the current status of POPF. In addition, we also discussed the current status of POPF in minimally invasive surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries, and robotic surgeries.

[Robot-assisted Whipple resection; results of the first 100 procedures in the Netherlands]. / Robotgeassisteerde Whipple-operatie.

OBJECTIVE: Investigation into the results of robot-assisted Whipple resection in the Netherlands. These results were compared with those of open Whipple procedures on the basis of recent large case series of patients. DESIGN: Case series of patients and systematic literature review. METHOD: We carried out a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data on the first 100 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted Whipple procedures in the period from March 2016 until March 2018 at the Erasmus MC, the Maasstad hospital or the Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht. We were mainly interested in surgery characteristics and postoperative outcomes. We compared our results with those of case series of patients with more than 500 open Whipple procedures carried out in a single hospital, published in the last 5 years. RESULTS: There were one or more serious complications in 22 patients (22%) and 2 patients (2%) developed multiple organ failure. 7 patients (7%) underwent reoperation. There was no postoperative mortality. In 14 case series (n = 12,708), complications occurred in 38% of patients and 7% of patients underwent reoperation. Mean mortality rate was 3%. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that robotic Whipple procedures can be carried out safely in the Netherlands. The number of complications and mortality rates are comparable with results of large case series of patients who underwent open Whipple procedures in a centre of expertise.

Surgical Loupe at 4.0× Magnification in Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Does It Affect the Surgical Outcomes? A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data about the impact of using magnification on rate of pancreatic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to show the impact of using magnifying surgical loupes 4.0× EF (electro-focus) on technical performance and surgical outcomes of PD. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This is a propensity score-matched study. Thirty patients underwent PD using surgical loupes at 4.0× magnification (Group A), and 60 patients underwent PD using the conventional method (Group B). The primary outcome was postoperative pancreatic fistula. Secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital stay. RESULTS: The total operative time was significantly longer in the loupe group ( P = .0001). The operative time for pancreatic reconstruction was significantly longer in the loupe group ( P = .0001). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding hospital stay, time to oral intake, total amount of drainage, and time of nasogastric tube removal. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated 3 independent factors of development of postoperative pancreatic fistula: pancreatic duct <3 mm, body mass index >25, and soft pancreas. CONCLUSION: Surgical loupes 4.0× added no advantage in surgical outcomes of PD with regard to improvement of postoperative complications rate or mortality rate.

Stented Pancreatico-duodenectomy: Does it lead to decreased pancreatic fistula rates? A prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rates in patients with stented versus non-stented pancreatico-jejunostomies. METHODS: The randomised comparative clinical trial was conducted at Civil Hospital, Karachi, from September 2009 to August 2015, and comprised patients presenting to the Surgical Unit 4 with a diagnosis of resectable periampullary carcinoma, carcinoma of head of pancreas, duodenal carcinoma involving the second part, and distal cholangiocarcinomas. Pancreatic fistula or leakage was defined as amylase-rich fluid lasting over 5 days, collected from the peripancreatic drains on day 1, 3 and 7 postoperatively, and the rate of clinically relevant fistulas was taken as primary study endpoint. RESULTS: There were 102 patients with a male to female ratio of 2.4:1. The overall mean age was 53.16±12.11 years (range: 30-80 years). Of the total, 53(51.9%) patients had pancreatic duct stent and 49(48%) did not. Clinically relevant pancreatic leak was seen in 13(12.7%) patients of whom 8(61.5%) were stented (p=0.46), 9(69.2%) patients had soft pancreatic texture (p=0.54) and 7(53.8%) had pancreatic duct <3mm (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic fistula rates between stented and non-stented anastomosis did not show any significant difference.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between open and robot-assisted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Robot surgery is a new method that maintains advantages and overcomes disadvantages of conventional methods, even in pancreatic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate safety and benefits of robot-assisted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (robot PD). METHODS: This study included 237 patients who underwent PD between 2015 and 2017. Demographics and surgical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent robot PD and 186 underwent open PD. Robot PD group had younger age (60.7 vs. 65.4 years, P = 0.006) and lower body mass index (22.7 vs. 24.0, P = 0.007). Robot PD group had lower proportion of patients with firm or hard pancreatic texture (15.7% vs. 38.2%, P = 0.004) and smaller pancreatic duct size (2.3 vs. 3.3 mm, P = 0.002). Two groups had similar operation time (robot vs. open: 335.6 vs. 330.1 min) and complications (15.7% vs. 21.0%), including postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (6.0% vs. 12.0%). Robot PD group had lower postoperative pain score (3.7 vs. 4.1 points, P = 0.008), and shorter postoperative stay (10.6 vs. 15.3 days, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robot PD is comparable to open PD in early outcomes. Robot PD is safe and feasible and enables early recovery; indication for robot PD is expected to expand in the near future.

Surgeon Variation in Intraoperative Supply Cost for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is Intraoperative Supply Cost Associated with Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: With increased scrutiny on the quality and cost of health care, surgeons must be mindful of their outcomes and resource use. We evaluated surgeon-specific intraoperative supply cost (ISC) for pancreaticoduodenectomy and examined whether ISC was associated with patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2012 and March 2015 were included. Outcomes were tracked prospectively through postoperative day 90, and ISC was defined as the facility cost of single-use surgical items and instruments, plus facility charges for multiuse equipment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test associations between ISC and patient outcomes using repeated measures at the surgeon level. RESULTS: There were 249 patients who met inclusion criteria. Median ISC was $1,882 (interquartile range [IQR] $1,497 to $2,281). Case volume for 6 surgeons ranged from 18 to 66. Median surgeon-specific ISC ranged from $1,496 to $2,371. Greater case volume was associated with decreased ISC (p < 0.001). Overall, ISC was not predictive of postoperative complications (p = 0.702) or total hospitalization expenditures (p = 0.195). At the surgeon level, surgeon-specific ISC was not associated with the surgeon-specific incidence of severe complication or any wound infection (p > 0.227 for both), but was associated with delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.004) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a single-institution cohort of 249 pancreaticoduodenectomies, high-volume surgeons tended to be low-cost surgeons. Across the cohort, ISC was not associated with outcomes. At the surgeon level, associations were noted between ISC and complications, but these may be attributable to unmeasured differences in the postoperative management of patients. These findings suggest that quality improvement efforts to restructure resource use toward more cost-effective practice may not affect patient outcomes, although prospective monitoring of safety and effectiveness must be of the utmost concern.

Efficacy of a Dual-ring Wound Protector for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Intrabiliary Stents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for preventing incisional surgical site infection (SSI) among patients with preoperative biliary stents undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study was a parallel, dual-arm, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Adult patients with a biliary stent undergoing elective PD at 2 tertiary care institutions were included (February 2013 to May 2016). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a surgical dual-ring wound protector or no wound protector, and also the current standard of care. The main outcome measure was incisional SSI, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, within 30 days of the index operation. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were recruited (mean age 67.2 years; standard deviation 12.9; 65% male). No significant differences were identified between the intervention and control groups (age, sex, body mass index, preoperative comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, prestent cholangitis). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of incisional SSI in the wound protector group (21.1% vs 44.0%; relative risk reduction 52%; P = 0.010). Patients with completed PD also displayed a decrease in incisional SSI with use of the wound protector compared with those palliated surgically (27.3% vs 48.7%; P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis did not identify any significant modifying factor relationships (estimated blood loss, duration of surgery, hospital site, etc.) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among adult patients with intrabiliary stents, the use of a dual-ring wound protector during PD significantly reduces the risk of incisional SSI.

The pancreatic juice length in the stent tube as the predicting factor of clinical relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Several risk factors for pancreatic fistula had been widely reported, but there was no research focusing on the exocrine output of remnant gland.During the study period of January 2015 to September 2016, 82 patients accepted pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD, end-to-end dunking pancreaticojejunostomy with internal stent tube). All the data were collected, including preoperative medical status, operative course, final pathology, gland texture, pancreatic duct diameter, size of the stent, length of pancreatic juice in the stent tube, width of the pancreatic stump, diameter of the jejunum and the status of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). POPF was defined according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula criteria.The diameter of pancreatic duct in the POPF group was significantly smaller than that in the group without POPF (1.99 vs 2.90 mm, P = .000). The length of pancreatic juice in the stent tube in the POPF group was significantly longer than that in the group without POPF (18.04 vs 6.92 cm, P = .014). There were more pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cases and hard glands in the group without POPF. The length of pancreatic juice in the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) group was significantly longer than that in the grade A group (32.4 vs 9.21 cm, P = .000). Multivariate analysis identified gland texture and length of pancreatic juice as independent predictors for pancreatic fistula. Multivariate analysis also identified the length of pancreatic juice as an independent predictor for CR-POPF.The length of pancreatic juice in the stent tube might be a useful predictive factor of POPF after PD, especially for CR-POPF.

How to treat intestinal obstruction due to malignant recurrence after Whipple's resection for pancreatic head cancer: Description of 2 new endoscopic techniques.

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer remains poor, even after initial surgical therapy. Local recurrence after Whipple's pancreatico-duodenectomy may lead to intestinal obstruction at the level of the afferent limb or the alimentary limb. Endoscopic insertion of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) into the intestinal malignant stricture is the preferred method of choice for palliation. We describe two new endoscopic techniques to treat a malignant intestinal obstruction with the insertion of a SEMS into the afferent limb and the alimentary limb. A case of malignant gastric outlet obstruction after a Whipple's resection was treated by the creation of an endoscopic gastrojejunostomy by the insertion of a lumen apposing HotAxios stent in between the stomach and the alimentary limb under fluoroscopic and endoscopic ultrasound control. Biliary obstruction and jaundice caused by a malignant stricture of the afferent limb after a Roux-en-Y Whipple's resection was treated by the insertion of a SEMS by means of the single-balloon overtube-assisted technique under fluoroscopic control. Feasibility and advantages of both techniques are discussed.

[Robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy : Video article]. / Roboterassistierte pyloruserhaltende Pankreaskopfresektion : Videobeitrag.

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is one of the most complex procedures in general surgery. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy was initially described in 1994; however, its worldwide distribution is so far limited to only a few specialist centers. Robotic surgery using the DaVinci® system can overcome many limitations of laparoscopic surgery. The system is a promising tool for a more widespread introduction of minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic diseases. Mortality rates of 0-5% and pancreatic fistula rates of 0-35% are described in the literature; therefore, thorough complication management is crucial in the postoperative course. The video presents a robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma in a female patient.

Manejo del gastrinoma pancreático asociado a la enfermedad de Von Hippel-Lindau. A propósito de un caso / Management of pancreatic gastrinoma associated with Von Hippel-Lindau disease: a case report

Introducción: los tumores neuroendocrinos de páncreas (TNEP) son un grupo heterogéneo y constituyen el 1,3% de todos los tumores pancreáticos. Aproximadamente el 10% aparecen en el contexto de síndromes familiares como el Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL). Caso clínico: presentamos el caso de una paciente mujer de 37 años diagnosticada de VHL e intervenida en varias ocasiones por hemangioblastomas cerebrales y carcinomas renales. Durante su seguimiento se diagnostica de 2 gastrinomas funcionantes menores de 2 cm que se enuclearon. Posteriormente desarrolló nuevo TNEP y se le realizó una duodenopancreatectomía total sin preservación pilórica. Discusión: el manejo de los TNEP en el VHL es difícil debido a la asociación de múltiples tumores en diferentes órganos y a la morbi-mortalidad asociada a la cirugía del páncreas. Su tratamiento hay que individualizarlo en cada paciente, basándonos en su capacidad de producción de hormonas y, por tanto de dar sintomatología, en su tamaño y localización y, además debe ser contextualizado con el resto de tumores que suelen presentar estos pacientes (AU)

Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group and constitute 1.3% of all pancreatic tumors. Approximately 10% of these occur in the context of hereditary syndromes, such as VHL disease. Case report: We report a case of a female patient of 37 years diagnosed VHL and intervened on several occasions by cerebral hemangioblastoma and renal carcinomas. During its follow-up she was diagnosed 2 gastrinomas functioning under 2 cm were enucleated. Later developed new PNET and underwent a total duodenopancreatectomy without pyloric preservation. Discussion: The management of PNET in VHL is difficult due to the association of multiple tumors in different organs and the morbidity and mortality associated with the surgery of the pancreas. Management must be individualized for each patient, based on the ability to produce hormones and present symptoms, the size and location, and in the context of other tumors that usually present in these patients (AU)

Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute.

The use of robotic surgery in the hepatobilio-pancreatic (HBP) field is still limited. Our aim is to present our early experience of robotic liver resection. A retrospective review of robotic pancreatic and liver resection was performed at Sanchinarro University hospital from October 2010 to April 2016. Since the beginning of the robotic program in our center, 22 hepatic procedures and 45 pancreatic robotic procedures have been performed. Of the 21 patients subjected to liver resection, 13 (65%) were for malignancy. There were two left hepatectomies, one right hepatectomy, one associated liver partition and portal vein ligation staged procedure (both steps by robotic approach), three bisegmentectomies and three segmentectomies, eight wedge resections, and three pericystectomies. The mean operating time was 282 min. The overall conversion rate and postoperative complication rate were 4.7 and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.4 days (range 4-64 days). Of the 45 patients subjected to pancreatic resection, 22 were male and 23 female. The average age of all patients was 62 years (range 31-82 years). The mean operating room (OR) time was 370 min (120-780 min). Among the procedures performed were 15 pancreatico-duodenectomies, 19 distal pancreatectomies, and 11 enucleations. All procedures in the HBP area were R0. Our early experience shows that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible procedure in the HBP area. The complication and mortality rates are comparable to those of open surgery, but with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Measure of pancreas transection and postoperative pancreatic fistula.

BACKGROUND: In pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), a standard protocol for pancreas transection has not been established although the method of pancreas transection might be involved in the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). This study aimed to compare whether pancreas transection by ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) or that by scalpel contributed more to POPF development. METHODS: A prospective database of 171 patients who underwent PD for periampullary tumor at National Cancer Center Hospital East between January 2010 and June 2013 was reviewed. Among the 171 patients, 93 patients with soft pancreas were specifically included in this study. Surgical results and background were compared between patients with pancreas transection by UAS and scalpel to evaluate the effectiveness of UAS on reducing POPF. RESULTS: Body mass index, main pancreatic duct diameter, or other clinicopathologic factors that have been reported as predictive factors for POPF were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of all grades of POPF and that of grade B were significantly lower in the scalpel group (52%, 4%) than in the UAS group (74%, 42%). Postoperative complications ≥ grade III were also significantly fewer in the scalpel group. CONCLUSIONS: Scalpel transection was less associated with POPF than UAS transection in patients who underwent PD for soft pancreas. The method of pancreas transection plays an important role in the prevention of clinical POPF.

[Robot-assisted Pylorus-Preserving Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Kausch-Whipple Procedure)]. / Roboterassistierte, pyloruserhaltende partielle Duodenopankreatektomie nach Kausch-Whipple.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of pancreatic head tumours is one of the most complex procedures in general surgery. In contrast to colorectal surgery, minimally-invasive techniques are not very commonly applied in pancreatic surgery. Both the delicate dissection along peri- and retropancreatic vessels and the extrahepatic bile ducts and subsequent reconstruction are very demanding with rigid standard laparoscopic instruments. The 4-arm robotic surgery system with angled instruments, unidirectional movement of instruments with adjustable transmission, tremor elimination and a stable, surgeon-controlled 3D-HD view is a promising platform to overcome the limitations of standard laparoscopic surgery regarding precise dissection and reconstruction in pancreatic surgery. INDICATION: Pancreatic head resection for mixed-type IPMN of the pancreatic head. PROCEDURE: Robot-assisted, minimally-invasive pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (Kausch-Whipple procedure). CONCLUSION: The robotic approach is particularly suited for complex procedures such as pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resections. The fully robotic Kausch-Whipple procedure is technically feasible and safe. The advantages of the robotic system are apparent in the delicate dissection near vascular structures, in lymph node dissection, the precise dissection of the uncinate process and, especially, bile duct and pancreatic anastomosis.

[Robotic Pancreatic Surgery]. / Roboterchirurgie des Pankreas.

Pancreatic surgery is one of the most challenging fields in visceral surgery. However, laparoscopic pancreatic surgery has not become the standard of care as yet, especially because of the very demanding reconstruction of anastomoses in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Robotic surgery has been a recent advance in laparoscopy. Its benefits are a better 3D view, a greater degree of freedom corresponding to that of the human hand, and tremor elimination. These factors greatly facilitate the intracorporeal suturing and knot-tying, which offers a technical advantage in performing pancreaticojejunostomy as compared with laparoscopic resections. However, only a few centres are offering this procedure for pancreatic resections. Retrospective analyses show that robotic pancreatic resections are safe und oncologically adequate if performed by experienced surgeons. Prospective, randomised trials comparing laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic resection techniques are not available to date.