T1 mapping for the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: correlation with Cambridge classification system.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine if T1 relaxation time of the pancreas can detect parenchymal changes in early chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 42 patients grouped as no CP (Cambridge 0; n = 21), equivocal (Cambridge 1; n = 12) or mild CP (Cambridge 2; n = 9) based on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings using the Cambridge classification as the reference standard. Unenhanced T1 maps were acquired using a three-dimensional dual flip-angle gradient-echo technique on the same 1.5 T scanner with the same imaging parameters. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the T1 relaxation times of Cambridge 0 and 1 group (p = 0.58). There was a significant difference (p = 0.0003) in the mean T1 relaxation times of the pancreas between the combined Cambridge 0 and 1 (mean = 639 msec, 95% CI: 617, 660) and Cambridge 2 groups (mean = 726 msec, 95% CI: 692, 759). There was significant difference (p = 0.0009) in the mean T1 relaxation times of the pancreas between the Cambridge 0 (mean = 636 msec, 95% CI: 606, 666) and Cambridge 2 groups (mean = 726 msec, 95% CI: 692,759) as well as between Cambridge 1 (mean = 643 msec, 95% CI: 608, 679) and Cambridge 2 groups (mean = 726 msec, 95% CI: 692,759) (p = 0.0017). Bland-Altman analysis showed measurements of one reader to be marginally higher than the other by 15.7 msec (2.4%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: T1 mapping is a practical method capable of quantitatively reflecting morphologic changes even in the early stages of chronic pancreatitis, and demonstrates promise for future implementation in routine clinical imaging protocols. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: T1 mapping can distinguish subtle parenchymal changes seen in early stage CP, and demonstrates promise for implementation in routine imaging protocols for the diagnosis of CP.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Management of Chronic Pancreatitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis (CP). RECENT FINDINGS: EUS has evolved and become invaluable in diagnosing early CP with the use of elastography and contrast enhancement. Lumen-apposing metal stents have allowed for easier transmural drainage and necrosectomy for pancreatic pseudocyst and walled of necrosis. EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage is being utilized for pancreatic duct complications including stenosis, stones, and duct disruptions that are not amendable to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. EUS is an effective tool that assists with the diagnosis and treatment of CP. The technology continues to evolve allowing for diagnosis of CP in earlier stages, which enables more effective therapy. The development of new EUS-guided tools and techniques has improved the treatment of complications from CP.

Classification of Early-Onset and Late-Onset Idiopathic Chronic Pancreatitis Needs Reconsideration.

Bimodal classification of idiopathic chronic pancreatitis (ICP) into early-onset (<35 years) and late-onset (>35 years) ICP was proposed in 1994 based on a study of 66 patients. However, bimodal distribution wasn't sufficiently demonstrated. Our objective was to examine the validity and relevance of the age-based bimodal classification of ICP. We analyzed the distribution of age at onset of ICP in our cohort of 1633 patients admitted to our center from January 2000 to December 2013. Classify ICP patients into early-onset ICP(a) and late-onset ICP(a) according to different cut-off values (cut-off value, a = 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65 years old) for age at onset. Compare clinical characteristics of early-onset ICP(a) and late-onset ICP(a). We found slightly right skewed distribution of age at onset for ICP in our cohort. There were differences between early-onset and late-onset ICP with respect to basic clinical characteristics and development of key clinical events regardless of the cut off age at onset i.e. 15, 25, 35, 45 or even higher. The validity of the bimodal classification of early-onset and late-onset ICP could not be established in our large patient cohort and therefore such a classification needs to be reconsidered.

Impact of age on the diagnostic performance of pancreatic ductal diameters in detecting chronic pancreatitis.

PURPOSE: In the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP), definition of main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilation is challenging due to lack of commonly accepted normal values. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of MPD diameters to detect CP including the impact of age. METHODS: 274 patients with ERCP-verified CP and 262 healthy controls were included. All had magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with measurement of MPD diameters in the pancreatic head, body, and tail. CP disease stage was defined as patients with and without functional (exocrine and/or endocrine) impairment. Diagnostic performance of MPD diameter and corresponding cut-offs values to diagnose CP were determined, including an age-stratified analysis. RESULTS: In healthy controls, an effect of age on MPD diameters was seen for the pancreatic head (P < 0.001), body (P = 0.006), and tail (P = 0.03). Patients with CP had increased MPD diameter compared to controls (all segments P < 0.001). Increased pancreatic head MPD diameter was seen in patients with functional pancreatic impairment compared to patients without (P = 0.03). The diagnostic performance of MPD diameter to detect CP was high (all segments ROC-AUC > 0.92). The optimal pancreatic MPD diameter cut-off values for diagnosing CP were: < 40 years: 2.0(head) and 1.8(body) mm; 40-60 years: 2.4(head) and 2.1(body) mm; > 60 years: 2.7(head) and 2.1(body) mm. CONCLUSION: Age is an important factor when evaluating the diameter of the pancreatic ductal system. Our findings challenge the existing reported thresholds for defining an abnormal duct diameter and point at age-stratified assessments as an integrated part of future imaging-based diagnostic and grading systems for CP.

Inter-observer variability of radiologists for Cambridge classification of chronic pancreatitis using CT and MRCP: results from a large multi-center study.

PURPOSE: Determine inter-observer variability among radiologists in assigning Cambridge Classification (CC) of chronic pancreatitis (CP) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). METHODS: Among 422 eligible subjects enrolled into the PROCEED study between 6/2017 and 8/2018, 39 were selected randomly for this study (chronic abdominal pain (n = 8; CC of 0), suspected CP (n = 22; CC of 0, 1 or 2) or definite CP (n = 9; CC of 3 or 4). Each imaging was scored by the local radiologist (LRs) and three of five central radiologists (CRs) at other consortium sites. The CRs were blinded to clinical data and site information of the participants. We compared the CC score assigned by the LR with the consensus CC score assigned by the CRs. The weighted kappa statistic (K) was used to estimate the inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: For the majority of subjects (34/39), the group assignment by LR agreed with the consensus composite CT/MRCP score by the CRs (concordance ranging from 75 to 89% depending on cohort group). There was moderate agreement (63% and 67% agreed, respectively) between CRs and LRs in both the CT score (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.56 [0.34, 0.78]; p-value = 0.57) and the MR score (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.49, 0.86]; p-value = 0.72). The composite CT/MR score showed moderate agreement (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.62 [0.43, 0.81]; p-value = 0.80). CONCLUSION: There is a high degree of concordance among radiologists for assignment of CC using MRI and CT.

Pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis in chronic pancreatitis: a feasibility and validation study.

PURPOSE: This feasibility and validation study addresses the potential use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture analysis of the pancreas in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: Extraction of 851 MRI texture features from diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of the pancreas was performed in 77 CP patients and 22 healthy controls. Features were reduced to classify patients into subgroups, and a Bayes classifier was trained using a tenfold cross-validation forward selection procedure. The classifier was optimized to obtain the best average m-fold accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Classifiers were: presence of disease (CP vs. healthy controls), etiological risk factors (alcoholic vs. nonalcoholic etiology of CP and tobacco use vs. no tobacco use), and complications to CP (presumed pancreatogenic diabetes vs. no diabetes and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency vs. normal pancreatic function). RESULTS: The best classification performance was obtained for the disease classifier selecting only five of the original features with 98% accuracy, 97% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 100% positive predictive value. The risk factor classifiers obtained good performance using 9 (alcohol: 88% accuracy) and 10 features (tobacco: 86% accuracy). The two complication classifiers obtained similar accuracies with only 4 (diabetes: 83% accuracy) and 3 features (exocrine pancreatic function: 82% accuracy). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic texture analysis demonstrated to be feasible in patients with CP and discriminate clinically relevant subgroups based on etiological risk factors and complications. In future studies, the method may provide useful information on disease progression (monitoring) and detection of biomarkers characterizing early-stage CP.

Accuracy of a novel noninvasive secretin-enhanced MRCP severity index scoring system for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: correlation with EUS-based Rosemont criteria.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of a secretin-enhanced MRCP Chronic Pancreatitis Severity Index (CPSI) in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP) based on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) Rosemont criteria. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 31 patients (20 women; median age 48 years, range 18-77) with known/suspected CP evaluated with both EUS and secretin-enhanced MRCP were included. CP severity was graded using a ten-point-scale secretin-enhanced MRCP-based CPSI scoring system which considered ductal, parenchymal and secretin-based dynamic abnormalities. Cases were categorized as normal, mild, moderate or severe CP. Correlation between CPSI and the EUS Rosemont criteria was performed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Comparative evaluation of test performance was obtained using ROC analysis. RESULTS: Using EUS Rosemont criteria, eight patients had features consistent/suggestive of CP, 20 patients were normal and three were indeterminate. On CPSI, five patients were normal, 12 had mild and 14 had moderate/severe CP. There was only fair agreement (k = 0.272) between CPSI and Rosemont criteria categories. CPSI showed 87.5% sensitivity, 69.6% specificity and 74.2% accuracy (cutoff value = 3.5 points; area under the curve = 0.804; p = 0.0026) for CP diagnosis based on EUS Rosemont criteria. CONCLUSION: CPSI showed relatively high diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of CP based on Rosemont criteria. The CPSI scoring system can be proposed as a noninvasive alternative to the EUS Rosemont criteria for CP diagnosis.

Cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring of chronic pancreatitis: why it is necessary and how it can be done.

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) remains a diagnostic challenge as clinical symptoms are non-specific, histopathological appearances are varied and pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. Multiple classifications and grading systems have been proposed for CP, but none leverage the full capabilities of cross-sectional imaging modalities and are not widely accepted or validated. CT and MRI/MRCP are useful in identifying a wide spectrum of histopathological changes in CP and can also assess exocrine reserve of pancreas. Advanced MRI techniques such as T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction can potentially identify early CP. Cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring can quantify CP disease burden and may have positive implications for clinicians and researchers. In this review, we discuss the need for cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring for CP, role of CT, and MRI/MRCP in assessment of CP and how these modalities can be used to obtain severity scoring for CP. We summarize relevant information from recently published CT and MRI/MRCP reporting standards for CP, and from international guidelines for cross-sectional imaging and severity scoring for CP.

Clinical Classification and Severity Scoring Systems in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is characterised by pain, functional deficits, nutritional and mechanical complications. Frequently managed in out-patient settings, the clinical course is unpredictable and requires multi-disciplinary care. There remains substantial variation in management. In contrast to acute pancreatitis, there are no globally accepted classification or severity scores to predict the disease course or compare interventions. We conducted a systematic review to determine the scope and clinical use of existing scoring systems. METHODS: A systematic search was developed with a medical librarian using the Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Original articles and conference abstracts describing an original or modified classification or scoring system in CP that stratified patients into clinical and/or severity categories were included. To assess clinical application/validation, studies using all or part of a score as a stratification tool to measure another parameter or outcome were selected. Studies reporting on diagnosis or aetiology only were excluded. Four authors performed the search in independent pairs and conflicts were resolved by a fifth author using CovidenceTM systematic review software. RESULTS: Following screening 6,652 titles and 235 full-text reviews, 48 papers were analysed. Eleven described original scores and 6 described modifications of published scores. Many were comprehensive but limited in capturing the full spectrum of disease. In 31 studies, a score was used to categorise patients to compare or correlate various outcome measures. Exocrine and endocrine dysfunction and pain were included in 6, 5, and 4 scoring systems, respectively. No score included other nutrition parameters, such as bone health, malnutrition, or nutrient deficiency. Only one score has been objectively validated prospectively and independently for monitoring clinical progression and prognosis, but this had been applied to an in-patient population. CONCLUSION: Available systems and scores do not reflect recent advances and guidelines in CP and are not commonly used. A practical clinical classification and scoring system, validated prospectively for prognostication would be useful for the meaningful analysis in observational and interventional studies in CP.

Laparoscopic longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy and modified Frey's operation for chronic calcific pancreatitis.

Background: Chronic pancreatitis is a debilitating disease presenting with pain, diabetes and steatorrhoea. Surgery offers better long-term pain relief than other interventions, but there is still uncertainty about the optimal surgical procedure and approach and a lack of long-term follow-up data in patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis selected for laparoscopic surgical treatment. Methods: This was an observational cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for chronic calcific pancreatitis between January 2006 and April 2017, and had completed a minimum follow-up of 1 year at a tertiary-care teaching institute. Eligibility for the laparoscopic approach was main duct diameter greater than 7 mm, absence of extensive head calcification, size of head less than 3·5 cm, absence of local complications, and ASA grade I or II status. The primary outcome variable was a reduction in pain score by 1 year. Secondary outcomes were hospital stay, complications, pain score at 3 and 5 years, and the development or progression of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Results: Some 57 patients were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgery for chronic pancreatitis: longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy (39), modified Frey's procedure (15) and pancreatoduodenectomy for suspicion of malignancy (3). The latter three patients were excluded from the analysis. Conversion to open surgery was needed in ten of the 57 patients (18 per cent). The mean(s.d.) age of the analysed cohort was 34·2(3·7) years and there was a predominance of men (34, 63 per cent). Adequate pain relief was achieved in 91, 89 and 88 per cent of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years of follow-up respectively. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgical management of chronic calcific pancreatitis with longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy or modified Frey's procedure is feasible, safe and effective in selected patients for the relief of pain.

Clinical evaluation of the M-ANNHEIM classification: Development of the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score as a new tool to monitor patients with chronic pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: The M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis (CP) stratifies degrees of disease severity according to the M-ANNHEIM-Severity-Score. We aimed to demonstrate the clinical usefulness of the M-ANNHEIM-Severity-Score in quantifying and predicting the frequency of pancreatic surgery, and to establish the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score as a simplified system for patient surveillance regarding the demand of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study with 741 CP patients (Mannheim/Germany, n = 537; Gießen/Germany, n = 100; Donetsk/Ukraine, n = 104) categorized according to the M-ANNHEIM classification. RESULTS: We observed a significantly higher M-ANNHEIM-Severity-Score in patients that were classified within 7 days preceding pancreatic surgery than in individuals that did not require surgery (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney-U-test). Using a logistic regression analysis with all variables of the M-ANNHEIM-Severity-Score, we established the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score as a simplified new tool to identify patients that may require surgery. A receiver operating characteristic-analysis revealed a cut-off-value of 9 points within the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score to identify these individuals (sensitivity 78.7 %, specificity 91 %). Based on the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score, we defined three categories for demand of surgery with frequencies of pancreatic operations of 1.6 % (n = 7/440) in the "Baseline-Demand"-category, 7 % (n = 12/172) in the "Low-Demand"-category (p < 0.0001, Chi-square-test, OR 4.6, Confidence Interval (CI) 1.8 - 12), and 54 % (n = 70/129) in the "High-Demand"-category (p < 0.0001, OR 73, CI 32 - 167). Patients that were categorized for the "High-Demand"-category, but were not operated on, had a significantly increased ratio of clinical features that hamper performance of surgery (p < 0.001, Chi-square-test). CONCLUSIONS: The M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score represents a useful tool to monitor patients with CP and to estimate the demand of surgery in CP.

Pancreatitis crónica. Algunos aspectos históricos relevantes / Chronic pancreatitis. Some important historical aspects

Desde la antigüedad había llamado la atención el aumento de tamaño y dureza que, en ocasiones, presentaba la estructura abdominal que recibió el nombre de páncreas. Portal en 1803 describió por primera vez los signos clínicos de la pancreatitis crónica. En 1815 Fleischman especuló sobre el posible papel del consumo exagerado de alcohol. Comfort en 1946 acuñó el término «pancreatitis crónica recidivante» y 6 años más tarde refirió lo que se llamaría pancreatitis hereditaria. Zuidema en 1959 definió la pancreatitis tropical y 2 años después Sarles puntualizó sobre otra forma de pancreatitis que en 1995 Yoshida denominaría pancreatitis autoinmune. La pancreatitis del surco era descrita en 1970 por Potet. En 1984 se definió la pancreatitis obstructiva y en 1987 Ammann refirió la pancreatitis idiopática. En este artículo se hace un recuerdo histórico de los pioneros que supieron valorar determinadas características que permitieron definir diferentes formas de pancreatitis crónicas

Since ancient times the increase of size and hardness sometimes presented by the abdominal structure known as the pancreas has attracted attention. Portal was the first to describe the clinical signs of chronic pancreatitis in 1803. In 1815, Fleischman speculated about the potential role of excessive alcohol consumption. Comfort coined the term "chronic relapsing pancreatitis" in 1946 and described hereditary pancreatitis 6 years later. Zuidema defined tropical pancreatitis in 1959 and 2 years later Sarles described another form of pancreatitis to which Yoshida gave the name autoimmune pancreatitis in 1995. Groove pancreatitis was described by Potet in 1970. Obstructive pancreatitis was defined in 1984 and Ammann identified idiopathic pancreatitis 3 years later. This article gives a historical account of the pioneers who developed the knowledge of how to assess the characteristics that allowed the different forms of chronic pancreatitis to be defined

Chronic pancreatitis. Some important historical aspects. / Pancreatitis crónica. Algunos aspectos históricos relevantes.

Since ancient times the increase of size and hardness sometimes presented by the abdominal structure known as the pancreas has attracted attention. Portal was the first to describe the clinical signs of chronic pancreatitis in 1803. In 1815, Fleischman speculated about the potential role of excessive alcohol consumption. Comfort coined the term "chronic relapsing pancreatitis" in 1946 and described hereditary pancreatitis 6 years later. Zuidema defined tropical pancreatitis in 1959 and 2 years later Sarles described another form of pancreatitis to which Yoshida gave the name autoimmune pancreatitis in 1995. Groove pancreatitis was described by Potet in 1970. Obstructive pancreatitis was defined in 1984 and Ammann identified idiopathic pancreatitis 3 years later. This article gives a historical account of the pioneers who developed the knowledge of how to assess the characteristics that allowed the different forms of chronic pancreatitis to be defined.

Point shear-wave elastography in chronic pancreatitis: A promising tool for staging disease severity.

BACKGROUND: Objectives: ElastPQ®-pSWE is an ultrasound technique developed to stage disease severity in patients with chronic liver diseases. Little data is available about its application to the pancreas. We aimed to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of pancreatic stiffness (PS) measurements in patients with chronic pancreatitis and their relationship with clinical and laboratory data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 52 consecutive patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) (40 males; median age 60 years) underwent hepatic and pancreatic pSWE. Liver stiffness was measured by transient elastography, 42 healthy subjects being controls (25 males; median age 54 years). Pancreatic pSWE inter-observer agreement was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effects of clinical, laboratory and US data on PS measurements were evaluated by linear regression. RESULTS: pSWE was feasible in all the CP patients, but one. Pancreatic stiffness was significantly higher in CP patients than healthy controls (4.3 ± SD 2.4 vs. 2.8 ± SD 1.1 kPa, respectively, p = 0.001). Significantly higher values in the CP group were observed in patients with longer disease duration (>10 vs. ≤10 years) (5.8 ± SD 4 vs. 3.9 ± SD 1.5 kPa, respectively, p = 0.01), on chronic analgesic drugs (6.0 vs. 3.5 kPa, p < 0.05) and with lower body weight (p < 0.05, r = -0.38). At multivariate analysis all the three variables resulted independently associated to the pancreatic stiffness value. The ICC for PS was 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: ElastPQ®-pSWE is promising and reproducible in assessing pancreatic stiffness, which mainly reflects disease length and severity. Accordingly, its use is of potential value in stratifying CP patients by identifying those with a more serious degree of disease.

Paraduodenal Pancreatitis: Imaging and Pathologic Correlation of 47 Cases Elucidates Distinct Subtypes and the Factors Involved in its Etiopathogenesis.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of paraduodenal (groove) pancreatitis (PDP) remain to be fully unraveled. In this study, 47 PDPs with preoperative enhanced images available were subjected to detailed comparative analysis in conjunction with pathologic findings. PDP were predominantly in males (3:1) with a mean age of 50 years, and 60% had a preoperative diagnosis of cancer. Mean lesional size was 3.1 cm. Three distinct subtypes were identified by imaging. Solid-tumoral (type-1) with groove-predominant (type-1A, 36%) forming a distinct solid band between the duodenum and pancreas often with histologic microabscesses (69% vs. 33% in others), and pancreas-involving (type-1B, 19%) forming a pseudotumoral mass spanning into the head-groove area, always diagnosed preoperatively as "cancer," but often lacked parenchymal atrophy of the body (44% vs. 92%). Cyst-forming (type-2) had groove-predominant (type-2A, 15%), often accompanied by Brunner gland hyperplasia, and pancreas-predominant (type-2B, 15%) were in younger (mean: 44 y) females (57% vs. 18%) and had less alcohol/tobacco abuse (50/33% vs. 81/69%). Ill-defined (type-3; 15%) often had main pancreatic duct dilatation (mean: 5.6 vs. 2.8 mm). The capricious presentations of PDP could be attributed to variable effects of different mechanistic and precipitative etiopathogenetic factors such as disturbed accessory duct outflow (dilated Santorini duct, 87%), aggravated by alcohol (77%) with superimposed stasis in the main ampulla (previous cholecystectomy, 47%; choledocholithiasis, 9%), strictured Wirsung duct (68%), and some likely exacerbated by ischemia (hypertension [59%], tobacco abuse [64%], arteriosclerosis in the tissue [23%]). In conclusion, our study identified 3 distinct types of PDP and each may reflect different pathogenetic contributing factors.

Epidemiology of Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Similarities and Differences.

Emerging data in the past few years suggest that acute, recurrent acute (RAP), and chronic pancreatitis (CP) represent a disease continuum. This review discusses the similarities and differences in the epidemiology of RAP and CP. RAP is a high-risk group, comprised of individuals at varying risk of progression. The premise is that RAP is an intermediary stage in the pathogenesis of CP, and a subset of RAP patients during their natural course transition to CP. Although many clinical factors have been identified, accurately predicting the probability of disease course in individual patients remains difficult. Future studies should focus on providing more precise estimates of the risk of disease transition in a cohort of patients, quantification of clinical events during the natural course of disease, and discovery of biomarkers of the different stages of the disease continuum. Availability of clinically relevant endpoints and linked biomarkers will allow more accurate prediction of the natural course of disease over intermediate- or long-term-based characteristics of an individual patient. These endpoints will also provide objective measures for use in clinical trials of interventions that aim to alter the natural course of disease.

Evaluation of Rosemont criteria for non-calcific chronic pancreatitis (NCCP) based on histopathology - A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Rosemont classification for chronic pancreatitis has not been evaluated specifically in non-calcific chronic pancreatitis (NCCP) patients and to this date, it has not been correlated with the gold standard namely histopathology. OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation of EUS Rosemont criteria for NCCP with histopathology from surgical specimens and evaluate the impact of age, sex, BMI, smoking and alcohol on Rosemont classification. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing TPIAT for NCCP between July 2009 and January 2013 were identified from our institutional database. The presence or absence of standard and Rosemont (major and minor) criteria were determined by expert endosonographers using linear endosonography. Patients were categorized into normal, indeterminate and suggestive with CP based on Rosemont classification. Histology was obtained at time of TPIAT from the resected pancreas by wedge biopsy of head, body and tail. All histopathology were re-reviewed by a GI pathologist blinded to endosonographic features and clinical outcomes. Available pancreatic tissue was graded for severity of intralobular and perilobular pancreatic fibrosis by the Ammann classification system. RESULTS: 50 patients with NCCP (42 females, mean age± SD = 37.9 ± 10.8) underwent TPIAT with preoperative EUS during the study period. Univariate analysis of features such as age, sex, BMI, smoking and alcohol history showed no significant difference between patients identified as normal and those identified as indeterminate/suggestive (p > 0.05). Rosemont "Normal" was poor in excluding CP as 5/9 patients (55.5%) had CP on histopathology. 25/26 patients (96.2%) with features "suggestive" of CP had evidence of CP on histopathology. 12/15 patients (80.0%) with "indeterminate" features had CP on histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Rosemont classification can be used independent of patient characteristics (age, sex and BMI) and environmental factors (smoking and alcohol exposure). In our cohort, Rosemont classification was strongly predictive of CP in patients with features "suggestive" of CP. However, "normal" Rosemont classification had poor correlation in this study. This is maybe due to lack of true comparator "normal" pancreas which cannot be obtained reasonably. The strength of agreement for diagnosis of CP was substantial between the standard and Rosemont criteria.