Hearing aid benefits in children with mild bilateral hearing loss: AUDIO-INFANS study.

OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of consensus regarding the definition, consequences, and management of mild bilateral hearing loss in children. The objective of this study is to analyze the benefit of hearing aids in children with mild bilateral hearing loss by evaluating their functional hearing. METHODS: This retrospective study included 57 children with mild bilateral hearing loss between 20 dB HL and 40 dB HL. Pure tone and speech audiometry thresholds were assessed with and without hearing aids. Two groups were subsequently formed: group E with an effective use of hearing aids (>10 h/day), and group IE whose use of hearing aids was deemed ineffective (<10 h/day). RESULTS: Without hearing aids, the initial median of hearing level was 35 dB HL and 36 dB HL in the right and left ears, respectively, compared to 23 dB HL and 25 dB HL with hearing aids. The Lafon test performed on 25 children at 55 dB HL and 65 dB HL showed results ranging from 0% to 100% without hearing aids and from 90% to 100% with hearing aids. Scores obtained with hearing aids were significantly higher than those without them at an average speech level. Median age at diagnosis and at prescription were found to significantly influence the daily use of hearing aids. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in the case of mild bilateral hearing loss, hearing aids have positive effects on the functional hearing of children and help them to no longer be disadvantaged. This study highlights the need to provide regular support to these children to ensure their optimal care in the event of hearing-related problems. Coordination between the different professionals working with these children is also necessary for their follow-up and appropriate management.

Implante coclear, efectos en implante unilateral o bilateral: revisión de la literatura / Cochlear implant, effects on unilateral or bilateral implant: review of the literature

El implante coclear (IC) es un dispositivo que habilita la capacidad de escucha en una persona con sordera neurosensorial profunda o moderada. La mayoría de las sorderas profundas son bilaterales, aunque no suelen ser simétricas, por lo que requerirán una adaptación específica de un aparato auditivo para cada oído. Según el grado de sordera, el individuo experimentará diversos grados de complicaciones en el desarrollo del lenguaje; en la sordera prelocutiva, habría modificaciones neuronales realizadas por la plasticidad cerebral, en las que los núcleos del lenguaje no se desarrollarían hasta no tener algún tipo de input de lenguaje. Idealmente, la edad máxima de implantación sería de 42 meses de edad en sorderas prelocutivas. Se recomienda fuertemente realizar implantación coclear bilateral (ICB) simultánea siempre que sea necesaria y adaptar un audífono de forma contralateral al implante coclear unilateral (ICU), cuando así se amerite, para proporcionar binauralidad y sus beneficios.(AU)

Determining unilateral or bilateral hearing aid preference in adults: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite high rates of bilateral hearing aid fitting globally, a number of adults continue to reject one hearing aid. The current study aimed to identify a clinically suitable tool for determining, pre-fitting, which clients might prefer one hearing aid.Study Sample: Ninety-five new adult hearing aid candidates, aged 49-87 years, were assessed prior to a first hearing aid fitting. Sixty-eight participants adhered to the prescribed protocol for both bilateral and unilateral hearing aid use. DESIGN: Performance was assessed on a modified version of the Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences test (LiSN-S), the Dichotic Digits difference Test, the Experiential Hearing Aid simulator, and the Grooved Pegboard Test. All participants were fitted bilaterally, but were instructed to alternate between unilateral and bilateral hearing aid use over fourteen weeks post-fitting. Participants' wearing preferences were assessed via a short questionnaire. RESULTS: 78% of participants expressed an overall preference for bilateral hearing aid use. Only the LiSN-S bilateral advantage test outcomes significantly correlated with overall wearing preference. CONCLUSIONS: Although the LiSN-S bilateral advantage score related to overall wearing preference, the accuracy of the predictor was too low to warrant implementation of this test prior to hearing aid fitting. The current practice of recommending bilateral hearing aid use continues to be the best option for clinicians.

The outcomes of bilateral cochlear implant users in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral cochlear implants are seen to improve hearing capabilities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the auditory outcome of paediatric bilateral cochlear implant in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional and descriptive study single centre analysis. Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP-II) scale and Speech, Spatial and Qualities (SSQ) of Hearing questionnaire were used. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were recruited. Majority of the children (30.4%) rated 7 and 23.9% scored perfectly (9) based on the CAP-II Scale. The least performing children were rated 5 (average). Children that were implanted sequentially within 24 months showed median CAP-II scale of 7. No significant correlation seen between CAP-II and the duration interval, use and age of 1st CI (p > .05). The speech domain of SSQ-P scale showed median value of 8 indicating good speech understanding. The spatial hearing domain had median value of 7, quality of hearing domain had median of 8. Significant correlation seen in hearing in noise with the duration of use of CI (p < .05). DISCUSSION: Bilateral CI have shown benefits in auditory performance even though majority were performed sequentially. Promising outcome was better with prolonged usage of the device. CONCLUSION: Hearing in noise is significantly better in bilateral CI.

Early diagnosis and treatment of unilateral or asymmetrical hearing loss in children: CODEPEH recommendations. / Diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz de la hipoacusia unilateral o asimétrica en la infancia: recomendaciones CODEPEH.

The aim of this document is to improve the management and the treatment of unilateral or asymmetrical hearing loss in children. One in one thousand newborn infants has unilateral hearing loss and this prevalence increases with age, due to cases of acquired and delayed-onset hearing loss. Although the impact on the development and learning processes of children of these kinds of hearing loss have usually been minimized, if they are not treated they will impact on language and speech development, as well as overall development, affecting the quality of life of the child and his/her family. The outcomes of the review are expressed as recommendations aimed at clinical diagnosis and therapeutic improvement for unilateral or asymmetrical hearing loss.

Quality of Life in Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: To assess quality of life (QOL) in pediatric patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL 4.0) and the Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life 26 (HEAR-QL-26) and HEAR-QL-28 surveys. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Surveys were administered to patients with SNHL (ages 2-18 years) from July 2016 to December 2018 at a multidisciplinary hearing loss clinic. Patients aged >7 years completed the HEAR-QL-26, HEAR-QL-28, and PedsQL 4.0 self-report tool, while parents completed the PedsQL 4.0 parent proxy report for children aged ≤7 years. Previously published data from children with normal hearing were used for controls. The independent t test was used for analysis. RESULTS: In our cohort of 100 patients, the mean age was 7.7 years (SD, 4.5): 62 participants had bilateral SNHL; 63 had mild to moderate SNHL; and 37 had severe to profound SNHL. Sixty-eight patients used a hearing device. Mean (SD) total survey scores for the PedsQL 4.0 (ages 2-7 and 8-18 years), HEAR-QL-26 (ages 7-12 years), and HEAR-QL-28 (ages 13-18 years) were 83.9 (14.0), 79.2 (11.1), 81.2 (9.8), and 77.5 (11.3), respectively. Mean QOL scores for patients with SNHL were significantly lower than those for controls on the basis of previously published normative data (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in QOL between children with unilateral and bilateral SNHL or between children with SNHL who did and did not require a hearing device. Low statistical power due to small subgroup sizes limited our analysis. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to collect QOL data from children with SNHL in a hearing loss clinic. Children with SNHL had significantly lower scores on validated QOL instruments when compared with peers with normal hearing.

Hearing Impairment and Quality of Life in Adults with Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Bimodal stimulation for asymmetric hearing loss is an emerging treatment with proven audiometric outcomes. Our objectives are to assess the changes of the hearing impairment and the quality of life of patients treated with this type of stimulation, when compared to a unilateral Cochlear Implant (CI) stimulated condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 31 patients with asymmetric hearing loss (Group 1) were recruited for the study. They were divided into three groups, based on their hearing loss in the ear treated with the hearing aid: Group 1A (Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) between 41 and 70 decibels (dB)); Group 1B, (PTA between 71 and 80 dB) and Group 1C (PTA between 81 and 90 dB). 30 patients had profound, bilateral hearing loss. Then, users of a unilateral cochlear implant were recruited for the control group. Their hearing impairment and quality of life were analyzed with questionnaires Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI). They were followed up for at least 2 years. RESULTS: The group with the asymmetric hearing loss obtains a statistically significant clinical improvement in the APHAB under category "with hearing aid" compared to "without hearing aid". The group with the asymmetric hearing loss benefits more across basically all variables compared with the control group in the SSQ. Group 1A obtains the best outcome of the sample in the HUI. CONCLUSION: Bimodal stimulation and better hearing in the ear treated with the hearing aid reduce hearing impairment and improve the quality of life.

Immune-Mediated Inner Ear Disease: Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches / Enfermedad inmunomediada del oído interno: diagnóstico y enfoques terapéuticos

Introduction: Immune Mediated Inner Ear Disease (IMIED) is a rare form of sensorineural bilateral hearing loss, usually progressing in weeks to months and responsive to immunosuppressive treatment. Despite recent advances, there is no consensus on diagnosis and optimal treatment. Methods: A review of articles on IMIED from the last 10 years was conducted using PubMed(R) database. Results: IMIED is a rare disease, mostly affecting middle aged women. It may be a primary ear disease or secondary to autoimmune systemic disease. A dual immune response (both cellular and humoral) seems to be involved. Cochlin may be the inner ear protein targeted in this disease. Distinction from other (core common) forms of neurosensory hearing loss is a challenge. Physical examination is mandatory for exclusion of other causes of hearing loss; audiometry identifies characteristic hearing curves. Laboratory and imaging studies are controversial since no diagnostic marker is available. Conclusion: Despite recent research, IMIED diagnosis remains exclusive. Steroids are the mainstay treatment; other therapies need further investigation. For refractory cases, cochlear implantation is an option and with good relative outcome

Introducción: La enfermedad inmunomediada del oído interno (EIMOI) es una forma rara de pérdida auditiva bilateral sensorineural, que progresa generalmente en semanas a meses y responde al tratamiento inmunosupresor. A pesar de los recientes avances, no hay consenso sobre el diagnóstico y el tratamiento óptimo. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión de artículos sobre la EAOI de los últimos 10 años utilizando la base de datos PubMed(R). Resultados: La EIMOI es una enfermedad rara que afecta principalmente a las mujeres de 2 a 50 años de edad. Puede ser una enfermedad del oído primaria o secundaria a una enfermedad sistémica autoinmune. Parece estar involucrada una respuesta inmune dual (tanto celular como humoral). La coclina parece ser la proteína del oído interno diana en esta enfermedad. La distinción de otras formas de pérdida de audición neurosensorial es un desafío. El examen físico es obligatorio para la exclusión de otras causas de pérdida de la audición; la audiometría identifica curvas características de pérdida de audición. Los estudios de laboratorio y de imágenes son controvertidos, ya que no hay marcador diagnóstico disponible. Conclusión: A pesar de la investigación reciente, el diagnóstico de la EAOI sigue siendo de exclusión. Los esteroides siguen siendo el pilar del tratamiento; otras terapéuticas necesitan más investigación. Para los casos refractarios, la implantación coclear es una opción con buen resultado relativo

Outcomes of early intervention for deaf children with additional needs following an Auditory Verbal approach to communication.

OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the rates of progress made by pre-school aged children with all degrees and types of hearing impairment and deafness, both with and without additional needs as catalogued using SNOMED CT, at the end of a non-statutory programme of individualised Auditory Verbal (AV) intervention. METHODS: An audit was conducted using a retrospective and comparative study design to examine spoken language outcomes in children who had spent more than two years on an AV programme and had completed their programmes between January 2007 and December 2017. The children were stratified according to i) whether they achieved age appropriate language (AAL) (n =102) or not (n =27); ii) whether they had deafness alone (n = 77) or deafness with additional needs (n =52); and iii) whether children with additional needs achieved AAL (n= 27) or not (n =25). Children undertook standardised spoken language assessments on joining the AV programme and then at intervals of at least 6 months for the duration of their programme. Derived measures of rates of language development (RLD) were used to compare the groups at i) the outset (initial RLD), and ii) the conclusion of the AV programme (programme RLD). RESULTS: Overall, 79% of children within this cohort achieved age appropriate spoken language scores. Children with additional needs (40%) embarked on a non-statutory AV programme at a significantly older age (corrected for prematurity), with significantly lower initial RLD and, as a group, attained significantly lower programme RLD compared with children with deafness alone. One in two of the children with additional needs reached AAL by the end of their individualised programme. The children with additional needs also demonstrated a highly significant increase in their mean programme RLD compared with the mean initial RLD indicating an acceleration in acquiring spoken language competencies while on the AV programme. CONCLUSIONS: For deaf children with additional needs who stay on an AV programme for more than two years, listening and spoken communication is significantly enhanced. Specific access to the AV approach in addition to generic, statutory early intervention could facilitate deaf children with additional needs to achieve or approach AAL. Ensuring families have access to effective early intervention increases the chances that i) a suitable communication approach is adopted at the earliest opportunity, and ii) a child with additional needs acquires listening and spoken language at a rate commensurate with their full potential. Applying the SNOMED CT framework as a means of categorising children's additional needs will enable more effective comparisons across studies from different centres around the world.

Patterns of Aided Loudness Growth in Experienced Adult Listeners with Early-Onset Severe-Profound Hearing Loss.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with early-onset severe-profound bilateral hearing loss (S/PHL) manifest diverse levels of benefit and satisfaction with hearing aids (HAs), even with prescriptive HA fitting. Such fittings incorporate normal loudness values, but little is known about aided loudness outcomes in this population and how those outcomes affect benefit or satisfaction. PURPOSE: To describe aided loudness growth and satisfaction with aided listening in experienced adult HA users with S/PHL. RESEARCH DESIGN: The Contour Test of loudness perception was administered to listeners with S/PHL in the aided sound field using broadband speech, band-limited speech, and warble tones. Patterns and slopes of resultant loudness growth functions were referenced to sound field results from listeners with normal hearing (NH). S/PHL listeners also rated their aided listening satisfaction. It was expected that (1) most S/PHL listeners would demonstrate steeper than normal aided loudness growth, (2) loudness normalization would be associated with better high-frequency detection thresholds and speech recognition, and (3) closer approximation to normal would yield greater satisfaction. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants were paid college-student volunteers: 23 with S/PHL, long-term aided listening experience, and new HAs; 15 with NH. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants rated loudness on four ascending runs per stimulus (5-dB increments) using categories defined in 1997 by Cox and colleagues. The region between the 10th and 90th percentiles of the NH distribution constituted local norms against which location and slope of the S/PHL functions were examined over the range from Quiet to Loud-but-OK. S/PHL functions were categorized on the basis of their configurations (locations/slopes) relative to the norms. RESULTS: Pattern of aided loudness was normalized or within 5 dB of the normal region on 37% of trials with sufficient data for analysis. Only one of the 23 S/PHL listeners did not demonstrate Normal/Near-normal loudness on any trials. Four nonnormal patterns were identified: Steep (recruitment-like; 38% of trials); Shifted right, with normal growth rate (10%); Hypersensitive, with most intensities louder than normal (10%); and Shallow, with decreasing growth rate (7%). Listeners with high-frequency average thresholds above 100 dB hearing loss or no phonemic-based speech-discrimination skill were less likely to display normalized loudness. Slope was within norms for 52% of S/PHL trials, most also having a Normal/Near-normal growth pattern. Regardless of measured loudness results, all but four listeners with S/PHL reported satisfactory hearing almost always or most of the time with their HAs in designated priority need areas. CONCLUSIONS: The variety of aided loudness growth patterns identified reflects the diversity known to characterize individuals with early-onset S/PHL. Loudness rating at the validation stage of HA fit with these listeners is likely to reveal nonnormal loudness, signaling need for further HA adjustment. High satisfaction, however, despite nonnormal loudness growth, suggests that listeners with poor auditory speech recognition may benefit more from aided loudness that supports pattern perception (via the time-intensity waveform of speech), different from most current-day prescription fits.

Bimodal benefit for cochlear implant listeners with different grades of hearing loss in the opposite ear.

OBJECTIVE: To determine speech perception in quiet and noise of adult cochlear implant listeners retaining a hearing aid contralaterally. Second, to investigate the influence of contralateral hearing thresholds and speech perception on bimodal hearing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sentence recognition with hearing aid alone, cochlear implant alone and bimodally at 6 months after cochlear implantation were assessed in 148 postlingually deafened adults. Data were analyzed for bimodal summation using measures of speech perception in quiet and in noise. RESULTS: Most of the subjects showed improved sentence recognition in quiet and in noise in the bimodal condition compared to the hearing aid-only or cochlear implant-only mode. The large variability of bimodal benefit in quiet can be partially explained by the degree of pure tone loss. Also, subjects with better hearing on the acoustic side experience significant benefit from the additional electrical input. CONCLUSIONS: Bimodal summation shows different characteristics in quiet and noise. Bimodal benefit in quiet depends on hearing thresholds at higher frequencies as well as in the lower- and middle-frequency ranges. For the bimodal benefit in noise, no correlation with hearing threshold in any frequency range was found.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis presenting with acute sensorineural hearing loss: a case report and review of the literature.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (EBV-HLH) is a life-threatening catastrophic and rarely seen complication of EBV infection especially in adults. While typical presentation of EBV infection is easily diagnosed as mononucleosis syndrome in teenagers and adults, some atypical clinical presentations may be challenged. We did not encounter any patient presenting with sudden sensorineural hearing loss associated with EBV infection in our English medical literature research (1966-2016). In this study, we report an adult patient who was complicated with EBV-HLH under high dose steroid therapy after diagnosis as sensorineural hearing loss. Our aim is to emphasise the atypical presentation of EBV infection and to discuss steroid therapy complication in sensorineural hearing loss that had been simply defined as idiopathic.

Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CIs) successfully restore hearing in postlingually deaf adults, but in doing so impose a frequency-position function in the cochlea that may differ from the physiological one. PURPOSE: The CI-imposed frequency-position function is determined by the frequency allocation table programmed into the listener's speech processor and by the location of the electrode array along the cochlea. To what extent can postlingually deaf CI users successfully adapt to the difference between physiological and CI-imposed frequency-position functions? RESEARCH DESIGN: We attempt to answer the question by combining behavioral measures of electroacoustic pitch matching (PM) and measures of electrode location within the cochlea. STUDY SAMPLE: The participants in this study were 16 adult CI users with residual hearing who could match the pitch of acoustic pure tones presented to their unimplanted ears to the pitch resulting from stimulation of different CI electrodes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We obtained data for four to eight apical electrodes from 16 participants with CIs (most of whom were long-term users), and estimated electrode insertion angle for 12 of these participants. PM functions in this group were compared with the two frequency-position functions discussed above. RESULTS: Taken together, the findings were consistent with the possibility that adaptation to the frequency-position function imposed by CIs does happen, but it is not always complete. CONCLUSIONS: Some electrodes continue to be perceived as higher pitched than the acoustic frequencies with which they are associated despite years of listening experience after cochlear implantation.

Automated Smartphone Threshold Audiometry: Validity and Time Efficiency.

BACKGROUND: Smartphone-based threshold audiometry with automated testing has the potential to provide affordable access to audiometry in underserved contexts. PURPOSE: To validate the threshold version (hearTest) of the validated hearScreen™ smartphone-based application using inexpensive smartphones (Android operating system) and calibrated supra-aural headphones. RESEARCH DESIGN: A repeated measures within-participant study design was employed to compare air-conduction thresholds (0.5-8 kHz) obtained through automated smartphone audiometry to thresholds obtained through conventional audiometry. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 95 participants were included in the study. Of these, 30 were adults, who had known bilateral hearing losses of varying degrees (mean age = 59 yr, standard deviation [SD] = 21.8; 56.7% female), and 65 were adolescents (mean age = 16.5 yr, SD = 1.2; 70.8% female), of which 61 had normal hearing and the remaining 4 had mild hearing losses. DATA ANALYSIS: Threshold comparisons were made between the two test procedures. The Wilcoxon signed-ranked test was used for comparison of threshold correspondence between manual and smartphone thresholds and the paired samples t test was used to compare test time. RESULTS: Within the adult sample, 94.4% of thresholds obtained through smartphone and conventional audiometry corresponded within 10 dB or less. There was no significant difference between smartphone (6.75-min average, SD = 1.5) and conventional audiometry test duration (6.65-min average, SD = 2.5). Within the adolescent sample, 84.7% of thresholds obtained at 0.5, 2, and 4 kHz with hearTest and conventional audiometry corresponded within ≤5 dB. At 1 kHz, 79.3% of the thresholds differed by ≤10 dB. There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) between smartphone (7.09 min, SD = 1.2) and conventional audiometry test duration (3.23 min, SD = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The hearTest application with calibrated supra-aural headphones provides a cost-effective option to determine valid air-conduction hearing thresholds.

[20 Years of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation - an Analysis of the Implanted Patients]. / 20 Jahre bilaterale Cochleaimplantation ­ eine Analyse seither implantierter erwachsener Patienten.

Binaural hearing is essential for localization abilities and improves the speech perception in noise. Since 20 years, bilateral cochlear implantation is routinely performed to restore binaural hearing. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated speech perception in quiet (Freiburger monosyllables, Hochmair-Schulz-Moser (HSM) sentence test, each at 70 dB) and in noise (HSM test, signal-to-noise ratio 10 dB) in 103 out of 165 adult patients who were bilaterally implanted in Würzburg between 1995 and June 2014. In almost half the patients, the second implanted side showed the better speech perception. Compared to the first implanted side, the average monosyllable scores with bilateral implants were improved from 54 to 63% and the HSM scores from 86 to 96%. In noise the speech perception improved from 47 to 65%. The speech perception of the second implanted side was independent of the time interval between the implantation of both sides in this cohort of postlingually deafened patients. This cross-sectional data underline the importance of bilateral cochlear implantation for speech understanding in quiet and even more in noise and thus, for the everyday life. For this, bilateral cochlear implantation should be the generally accepted standard in the treatment of deaf patients.

Endoscopic-Assisted Cochlear Implantation: A Case Series.

The aim of the present study was to describe the use of the endoscopic-assisted cochlear implantation in cases with an unsuccessful standard surgical technique because of not achieving adequate exposure to the round window (RW). Three patients with a bilateral profound hearing loss were operated using an endoscopic-assisted cochlear implant procedure at our tertiary university referral center between 2012 and 2014. In all of the patients, a retroauricular "c" shaped incision was performed and a subperiosteal pocket was created. Standard cortical mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy were accomplished using a otomicroscope. However, RW and promontory could not be seen using this approach. The tympanomeatal flap was elevated and the middle ear cavity was entered A rigid 0 degree endoscope (2.7 mm wide, 18 cm in length) (Karl Storz company, Tuttlingen, Germany) and a connected HD camera system (Karl Storz Company, Tuttlingen, Germany) were used to expose RW through posterior tympanotomy, and a drill was passed through the external ear canal. The RW niche was removed using a diamond burr under endoscopic view; the endoscope was placed through the external ear canal, and electrodes were transferred through posterior tympanotomy. The electrodes were fully inserted under the endoscopic view in all cases. Endoscopic-assisted cochlear implantation may be a safe alternative surgical technique in cases where surgeons are not able to visualize RW and promontory using a microscope.

The clinical analysis of bilateral successive sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics of successive bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) with an interval of more than 1 year to aid the evaluation and management of successive bilateral SSNHL (BSSNHL). 14 successive BSSNHL patients and 118 unilateral SSNHL patients with severe and profound hearing loss were reviewed retrospectively. Information about successive BSSNHL was collected included demographics, the intervals between the attacks of bilateral ears, the past medical history, inducing factors, accompanying symptoms, pure-tone tests, blood tests, b-ultrasound examinations of vertebral artery and carotid artery, and medical interventions. And the comparison of improvement rate was made between successive BSSNHL and unilateral SSNHL. SPSS 15.0 was used to analyze the data. In successive BSSNHL, there were six males and eight females; the average aged was 49.86 ± 15.45 years (20-73 years). The interval of the two attacks was 11.43 ± 12.07 years (1-50 years) on average. The onset of treatment was 18.86 ± 12.71 days. Tinnitus was seen in 100 % of the patients, followed by vertigo in 42.85 %, and ear fullness in 21.43 %. 3 of 14 patients described obvious inducing factor: tiredness. Five patients (35.71 %) had hypertension histories, three (21.43 %) had diabetes histories, two (14.29 %) had surgery histories, one (7.14 %) was with depression history, one (7.14 %) was with coronary heart disease history. 30 % (3/10) patients were with atherosclerotic plaque in carotid artery. 4 (28.57 %) patients were with high blood sugar. 8 patients (57.14 %) were with high blood lipids. Thyroid function tests were positive in 27.27 % (3/11) patients. No abnormality was found in antinuclear antibodies titer. The percentage of profound and severe hearing loss were 71.43 and 78.57 % in the recently affected ear and contralateral ear separately. The PTAs of the recently affected ear were 77.14 ± 27.12 dB before treatment and 68.84 ± 22.32 dB after treatment, the improvement rate was 28.57 %. No improvement was found in the contralateral ears. In unilateral SSNHL, the average age was 42.47 ± 14.18 years. The onset of treatment was 18.08 ± 15.84 days. The improvement rate was 57.63 %, which was much higher than that of successive BSSNHL. There was no difference in age and time of onset of treatment between successive BSSNHL and unilateral SSNHL (p > 0.05). Successive BSSNHL is rare, the hearing impairment is severe, and the outcome of treatment is poorer. It may have a completely different profile compared with the simultaneous BSSNHL and unilateral SSNHL.

Benefit of contralateral hearing aid in adult cochlear implant bearers.

OBJECTIVES: The present study assessed the interest of a contralateral hearing aid (HA) in adult cochlear implant (CI) bearers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study recruited 10 French-speaking adult HA bearers with postlingual bilateral hearing loss, fitted for at least 2 years with a unilateral CI after loss of benefit from HA in one ear but continuing to use their contralateral HA: 4 male, 6 female; mean age, 58 years. All had regularly used bilateral HAs prior to CI. Audiometric assessment comprised: (1) individual ear hearing assessment on pure-tone audiometry and speech discrimination; and (2) free-field testing without aid, with CI only, with HA only and with CI plus HA, on pure-tone audiometry and speech discrimination with quiet background and on speech discrimination in noise. RESULTS: Speech discrimination was significantly improved in the bimodal condition (CI plus HA) as compared to CI alone, on all tests. In quiet, discrimination for disyllabic words was>50% in 7 cases with HA alone, in 2 cases with CI alone and in 1 case in with HA+CI. Under 0dB signal-to-noise ratio, discrimination was>50% in 1 case with HA alone, in 3 cases with CI alone and in 6 cases with HA+CI. CONCLUSION: The present results showed benefit in auditory perception in quiet and in noise with bimodal stimulation. When there is residual hearing in the non-implanted ear, a HA should be fitted; and in progressive bilateral hearing loss, CI should be suggested when HA benefit decreases in one ear.