Etiological classification of presbycusis in Turkish population according to audiogram configuration.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to classify age related hearing loss in Turkish population according to Schuknecht audiometric configurations for presbycusis and investigate the most common etiologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,134 patients (568 males, 566 females; mean age 70.5±7.7 years; range 55 to 80 years) with age related hearing loss were included in the study. Audiograms of patients were classified into three categories: high frequency steeply sloping (HFSS), flat, and high frequency gently sloping (HFGS). Speech discrimination scores were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: In the study population, HFSS audiogram configuration was the most frequently observed (48.5%), followed by HFGS configuration (26.9%), and flat configuration (24.5%), respectively. While HFSS audiogram configuration was statistically significantly more common in males, flat audiogram configuration was statistically significantly more common in females (p=0.0001). HFSS group mean air conduction threshold were statistically significantly higher than flat and HFGS groups (p=0.0001). No statistically significantly difference was detected in terms of speech discrimination scores between three groups (p=0.796). CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggest that, in Turkish population, while sensory presbycusis is more common in males, strial presbycusis is more common in females. No difference was detected in terms of the prevalence of cochlear presbycusis in males and females (p=0.0001).

[Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes]. / Göttinger Satztest im Störgeräusch für verschiedene Gruppen von Schwerhörigkeit.

BACKGROUND: In addition to the standardized Freiburg sentence test in silence validated speech tests in noise are available. They are mainly used to test the benefit of hearing systems in everyday-life situations. In diagnostics tests in noise can also give additional information of the patients' hearing impairment. The determined speech reception threshold (SRT) depends on the degree of hearing loss and the used speech and noise test material. Aim of this study was to analyze the results of the Göttingen sentence test in noise in relation to different audiogram classes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Göttingen sentence test in stationary noise (65 dB) was performed for 135 patients with different degrees of hearing losses. Based on the air-conducted threshold all ears were categorized to an audiogram class by an automated procedure. RESULTS: For the mild hearing losses the results of the Göttingen sentence test increased with increasing pure-tone-average (PTA) and the values are smaller than 0 dB SNR with a small standard deviation (± 1-2 dB SNR). For the moderate hearing losses values of 5 dB SNR with a standard deviation of 6 dB SNR were achieved on average. Patients with a high hearing loss achieved values higher than 20 dB SNR. CONCLUSION: For the mild hearing losses the results were located in a small range. However, they can give important information about the patient's hearing impairment mainly appears in a noisy environment. With increasing hearing loss also the reduced hearing in silence affects the results achieved with the Göttingen sentence test in noise. Therefore the hearing in silence has to be taken into account at the interpretation of the results.

[Problematic medical expertise concerning simulation and aggravation in audiology]. / Zur Problematik der Simulation und Aggravation in der HNO-ärztlichen Begutachtung.

BACKGROUND: The effect of an incorrect audiological medical assessment of noise trauma deafness can be substantial. The impact will be demonstrated using a case example. The reasons for incorrect assessment are often insufficient examination conditions or simulation and aggression of the subject. The results of a study on this topic will be presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 61 patients who underwent a psycho-acoustic medical assessment were grouped into 1 of 4 categories ranging from category 0 for no simulation or aggravation to category III for severe simulation and aggravation. For category III reliable and valid thresholds of pure tone audiometry can only be achieved using objective audiological measurements. The frequency, extent and socio-economic factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 61 individuals 26 showed no simulation or aggravation behavior (category 0), 10% were grouped into category III and 48% into categories I and II. The tendency to simulation and aggravation increased with the patients' age, the level of education and the frequency of medical examinations prior to this investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation and aggravation is a more frequent phenomenon than previously assumed (approximately 58% of all audiological examinations). The effect in terms of economical damage could be substantial. The usage of a well-defined classification is highly recommended in order to improve the quality of medical assessment in ENT.

[Loudness scaling. A procedure for quantitative recruitment detection]. / Lautheitsskalierung. Ein Verfahren zum quantitativen Recruitmentnachweis.

Direct loudness scaling has been known as an audiological tool for about four decades. Although numerous publications have shown its clinical importance, loudness scaling has not been used in audiology and hearing aid fitting until now. This might be due to the lack of audiometers equipped with loudness scaling devices as well as missing evidence for its clinical applicability. In this study normal data for a single-step direct scaling procedure were established and loudness determinations of 105 patients with sensorineural hearing losses collected. The results show that normal level loudness functions exhibit very similar shapes for narrow band stimulation in the frequency range of 500 to 4000 Hz. However, loudness scaling is affected by the gender of the subjects: females scale systematically louder than do males. In hearing-impaired subjects the slopes of the level loudness functions tend to decrease with increasing hearing loss, indicating negative recruitment. This holds particularly true in the high-frequency range, e.g. at 4000 Hz. Our long-term experience with single-step direct loudness scaling has proven its clinical feasibility in typical patients of an audiology unit. Loudness scaling will prove useful for the localization of hearing impairments, as it can be employed as a quantitative indicator of recruitment without any restrictive preconditions. In addition, it allows the evaluation of hearing aids and cochlear implants by frequency-specific gain measurement.

Cisplatin ototoxicity in children: a practical grading system.

A long-term follow-up study was carried out to assess ototoxicity in children who had been treated for a malignant tumour with "standard dose" cisplatin (60-100 mg/m2 per course), and were at least 2 years from stopping treatment. The median age at diagnosis was 2 years 2 months (range 1 month to 13.5 years). On the basis of hearing assessment by pure-tone audiometry, a practical grading system of hearing loss from 0 to 4 is proposed. Moderate to severe high-frequency hearing loss (grade 2-4) was found in half the children and 10 require appropriate hearing aids. The risk of developing ototoxicity increased significantly with the cumulative cisplatin dose (P = 0.027), although there was considerable individual susceptibility. Serial follow-up testing, to a median of 4 years after completion of cisplatin treatment, showed no recovery of hearing in any of these children. We suggest careful monitoring of young children by a consultant audiological physician throughout treatment with cisplatin, particularly when doses of 400 mg/m2 and over have been reached. Alternative chemotherapy should be discussed if grade 2 ototoxicity develops.