Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 17(1): 87-95, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22402617

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This randomized split-mouth clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of scaling and root planing associated to the high-intensity diode laser on periodontal therapy by means of clinical parameters and microbial reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 chronic periodontitis subjects, of both genders, were selected. One pair of contralateral single-rooted teeth with pocket depth >5 mm was chosen from each subject. All patients received non-surgical periodontal treatment, after which the experimental teeth were designated to either test or control groups. Both teeth received scaling, root planing and coronal polishing (SRP) and teeth assigned to the test group (SRP + DL) were irradiated with the 808 ± 5 nm diode laser, for 20 s, in two isolated appointments, 1 week apart. The laser was used in the continuous mode, with 1.5 W and power density of 1,193.7 W/cm(2). Clinical and microbiological data were collected at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months after therapy. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement of all the clinical parameters-clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP)-for both groups (P < 0.001), with no statistical difference between them at the 6 weeks and the 6 months examinations. As for microbiological analysis, a significant reduction after 6 weeks (P > 0.05) was observed as far as colony forming units (CFU) is concerned, for both groups. As for black-pigmented bacteria, a significant reduction was observed in both groups after 6 months. However, the difference between test and control groups was not significant. There was no association between group and presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans at any time of the study. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months of evaluation, the high-intensity diode laser has not shown any additional benefits to the conventional periodontal treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The high intensity diode laser did not provide additional benefits to non-surgical periodontal treatment. More studies are necessary to prove the actual need of this type of laser in the periodontal clinical practice.


Assuntos
Periodontite Crônica/terapia , Raspagem Dentária/métodos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers Semicondutores/uso terapêutico , Aplainamento Radicular/métodos , Adulto , Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans/isolamento & purificação , Carga Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Carga Bacteriana/efeitos da radiação , Periodontite Crônica/microbiologia , Periodontite Crônica/radioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Placa Dentária/microbiologia , Índice de Placa Dentária , Profilaxia Dentária/métodos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/radioterapia , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/terapia , Índice Periodontal , Bolsa Periodontal/radioterapia , Bolsa Periodontal/terapia , Porphyromonas gingivalis/isolamento & purificação , Prevotella intermedia/isolamento & purificação , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA