Top 100 most-cited papers on diabetes mellitus in Dentistry: a bibliometric study.

This study assessed the features of the 100 most-cited papers on diabetes mellitus (DM) in dentistry using bibliometric measures. A search of the most cited papers on DM using journals included in the category "Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine" in the Web of Science database up to January 2023 was performed. The complete bibliographic records of the selected papers were exported in plain text or Research Information Systems (RIS) file format. The following bibliometric indicators were collected: title, year, authors, number of citations, mean number of citations, institution, country, continent, study design, journal, impact factor, and keywords. Graphical bibliometric networks were created using the VOSviewer software. The number of citations for the 100 most-cited papers in DM research ranged from 111 to 566. Six papers each had more than 400 citations. Most were observational studies (n = 50) from the United States (USA) (n = 23) and were published in the Journal of Periodontology (30%; n=30). Robert Genco was the most cited author and contributed the most to the top 100 articles (3,653 citations; n = 13). The VOSviewer map of co-authorship showed the existence of clusters in research collaboration. The most prolific institutions were the Universities of Buffalo and Michigan (n = 6 each). "Diabetes mellitus" was the most frequent keyword, with 31 occurrences. In conclusion, the most cited studies that investigated the relationship between dentistry and DM were in periodontology. Observational studies, primarily from the USA, have been the most cited thus far.

Spin in dental publications: a scoping review.

The aim of this review was to map the practice of spin in scientific publications in the dental field. After registering the review protocol (osf.io/kw5qv/), a search was conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and OpenGrey databases in June 2023. Any study that evaluated the presence of spin in dentistry was eligible. Data were independently extracted in duplicate by two reviewers. After removing duplicates, 4888 records were screened and 38 were selected for full-text review. Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria, all of which detected the presence of spin in the primary studies, with the prevalence of spin ranging from 30% to 86%. The most common types of spin assessed in systematic reviews were failure to mention adverse effects of interventions and to report the number of studies/patients contributing to the meta-analysis of main outcomes. In randomized controlled trials, there was a focus on statistically significant within-group and between-group comparisons for primary or secondary outcomes (in abstract results) and claiming equivalence/noninferiority/similarity for statistically nonsignificant results (in abstract conclusions). The practice of spin is widespread in dental scientific literature among different specialties, journals, and countries. Its impact, however, remains poorly investigated.

Dental research related to COVID-19 in Brazil: research presented at the 38th SBPqO Meeting.

The aim of this study was to identify and describe the characteristics of coronavirus (COVID-19)-disease related dental research in Brazil presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Division of the International Association for Dental Research (SBPqO). A search was carried out in the proceedings of the meeting to retrieve all abstracts. Those containing the term "COVID-19" in titles, abstracts, or keywords, and/or those of which the scope approached a COVID-19-related topic were included. The variables extracted from abstracts were: presenter category, field of study, design, data collection method, population, affiliation, and authors' gender. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used, with a significance level of α = 0.05. The search retrieved 185 abstracts, 5 did not meet study eligibility criteria and were excluded. COVID-19-related research was presented by either aspiring/associate members (67.8%) or beginner members (32.2%). Data collection methods were predominantly digitally mediated (65%), followed by secondary data use (25%), and in-person data collection (7.2%). Irrespective of the role of authorship, there were a ratio of two female authors to each male. Among the last authors, the ratio was three females to each male. Female lead authors more frequently came from the Southeast region (71.8%; p = 0.470). There was an association between presenter category and study design (p = 0.012), clinical and epidemiological studies were more concentrated among experienced presenters. In conclusion, female dental researchers affiliated to southeastern institutions approached the topic of pandemic more frequently than male colleagues. The use of digital technology for data collection may have long-lasting impacts on the teaching and publication of dental research.

Research interest on dental sealant in dentistry based on the 100 most cited articles: bibliometric analysis.

The aim of this study was to identify and analyze the characteristics of the 100 most cited articles about dental sealants (DS) in dentistry. In September 2023, a search was performed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS-CC) database. The following information was extracted from each article: number and density of citations, year of publication, authorship, journal, impact factor, keywords, study design, theme, continent, country, and institution. The citations of the WoS-CC were compared with those of the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. The VOSviewer software was used to generate collaborative networks. The number of citations ranged from 33 to 205. The articles were published between 1961 and 2016. Buonocore MG (7%) was the most prominent author among the most cited. The Journal of the American Dental Association was the most frequent journal (25%) and Journal of Dental Research (7.6) had the highest impact factor. Most studies had interventional (41%) and laboratory (31%) designs, mainly addressing DS effectiveness in the prevention and control of dental caries (86%). There was a predominance of publications from North America (46%) and the USA was the country with the highest number of articles (44%). The most frequent institutions were the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) and the University of Rochester (USA) (6% each). "Retention" was the most frequent keyword. In conclusion, the 100 most cited articles were mostly interventional and laboratory studies, addressing the retention and efficacy of DS. Most of the articles were concentrated in North America and Europe, demonstrating a little collaboration from other continents.

Reporting characteristics of systematic review abstracts published in the proceedings of the SBPqO meeting

Aim: This study aimed to assess the reporting characteristics of systematic review abstracts published in the proceedings of the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) meeting. Methods: We selected abstracts published in the SBPqO meeting proceedings of 2019 and 2020, mentioning that a systematic review was conducted in the title, objective or methods sections. One researcher performed the screening and the data extraction after a pilot test training. The following data were extracted: affiliation of the primary author, dental specialization, the term "systematic review" mentioned in the title, reporting of the objective, reporting of eligibility criteria, reporting of information sources, reporting of the number of included studies and if a meta-analysis was performed. A descriptive analysis of the data was performed with data summarized as frequencies. Results: We included 235 abstracts. A total of 20 studies were from the Universidade de Uberlândia (8.5%), and the main specialization was Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry, with 47 studies (20%). Most of the studies mentioned the term "systematic review" in the title (n=219; 93.2%) and reported the objective (n=231; 98.3%). A great majority of studies did not report the eligibility criteria (n=97; 41.3%) or it was classified as unclear (n=96; 40.8%). The great majority of studies only reported the databases searched (n=103; 43.8%) or databases and date of search (n=74; 31.5%). Most of the studies reported the number of included studies (n=204; 86.8%). Conclusion: Based on this study, the reporting characteristics of systematic review abstracts published in the proceedings of the SBPqO meeting are satisfactory. However, there is room for improvement

Half-century of Dental Public Health research: bibliometric analysis of world scientific trends.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of Dental Public Health (DPH) scientific publications within core DPH journals over time and to compare DPH journals with DPH content from other journal types. METHODS: The Scopus database was used to identify DPH-relevant articles published from 1965 to 2014 in three core DPH journals (DPHJs) and from 2005 to 2014 in Dental Journals (DJs), Public Health (PHJs) and General Journals (GJs). To identify DPH-relevant articles, a search strategy with words about oral health and public health was applied to each group of journals. Research themes were created by grouping similar keywords to report changes in the focus of articles over time. The most productive journals, countries, institutions and authors were also estimated for each set of journals. RESULTS: In 2005-2014, 60 297 articles were identified, of which 2.7% in DPHJs, 10.4% from PHJs, 38.2% from GJs and 48.7% from DJs. DPH-relevant articles published in the core DPHJs, DJs and PHJs tended to share a strong emphasis on dental caries, healthcare/services research on children and adolescents. Over time, the focus in the DPHJs has increased towards health behaviour/promotion/education, quality of life and socioeconomic factors. In the last decade, those themes were more frequent in DPH journals than in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: DPH research published in DPHJs had some unique features and greater focus on the themes of quality of life, socioeconomic factors and health behaviour/education/promotion than other groups of journals.

Global Dental Research Productivity and Its Association With Human Development, Gross National Income, and Political Stability.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the associations between country level factors (such as human development, economic productivity, and political stability) and their dental research productivity. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of bibliometric data from Scopus search engine. Human Development Index (HDI), Gross National Income per capita (GNI), and Failed State Index measures were the independent variables. Outcomes were "Total number of publications (articles or articles in press) in the field of dentistry" and "Total number of publications in the field of dentistry per million population." Non-parametric tests were used to examine the association between the independent and outcome variables. RESULTS: During the year 2013, a total of 11,952 dental research articles were published across the world. The top 5 publishing countries were United States, Brazil, India, Japan, and United Kingdom. "Very High" HDI countries had significantly higher number of total dental research articles and dental research articles per million population when compared to the "High HDI," "Medium HDI," and "Low HDI" countries (p < 0.0001). There was a significant linear relationship between the GNI quartile income levels and outcome metrics (p ≤ 0.007). Countries which were highly politically stable were associated with significantly higher dental research productivity (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a regional concentration of articles with just five countries contributing to over 50% of all articles. The human development and economic development of a country are linearly correlated with dental research productivity. Dental research productivity also increases with increasing political stability of a country.

How sample size influences research outcomes.

Sample size calculation is part of the early stages of conducting an epidemiological, clinical or laboratory study. In preparing a scientific paper, there are ethical and methodological indications for its use. Two investigations conducted with the same methodology and achieving equivalent results, but different only in terms of sample size, may point the researcher in different directions when it comes to making clinical decisions. Therefore, ideally, samples should not be small and, contrary to what one might think, should not be excessive. The aim of this paper is to discuss in clinical language the main implications of the sample size when interpreting a study.

Perfil bibliométrico de revistas odontológicas de Chile del período 2002-2012 / Bibliometric profile of Chilean dental journals during the 2002-2012 period

OBJETIVO: Describir los principales indicadores bibliométricos de las revistas odontológicas chilenas durante el período 2002-2012. MATERIALES Y MÉTODO: Estudio bibliométrico. Se revisaron manualmente las bibliotecas de las 3 facultades de Odontología más antiguas de Chile para recuperar todas las publicaciones periódicas de revistas odontológicas chilenas durante los años 2002-2012 publicadas por universidades o sociedades profesionales. Adicionalmente, se buscó en bases de datos en línea. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron 7 revistas periódicas odontológicas en el período 2002-2012, que publicaron en total 827 artículos, con una tendencia al alza en el tiempo. Las revistas con mayor cantidad de artículos fueron Int J Odontostomatol (225), Rev Dent Chile (185) y Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral (145). Las instituciones con mayor número de autores son la Universidad de Chile (702), la Universidad de Valparaíso (179) y la Universidad de La Frontera (160). Las palabras clave más utilizadas fueron enfermedad periodontal, caries e implante dental. CONCLUSIÓN: Se observó un aumento en el número de revistas, cantidad de artículos, autores e instituciones que publican en revistas periódicas chilenas. Futuros estudios deberían enfocarse en el tipo y calidad de la evidencia publicada en revistas odontológicas chilenas, y evaluar el impacto que tendría la indización en bases de datos internacionales

AIM: Describe the main bibliometric indicators of chilean peer-reviewed dental journals for the 2002-2012 period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bibliometric study. The three oldest dentistry schools' libraries were manually checked in order to gather all the numbers of chilean dental journals from the 2002-2012 period, published by Universities or professional societies. Also, online databases were researched. RESULTS: There were 7 periodical chilean dental journals during the 2002-2012 period, which published a total of 827 articles. The journals with the most published articles were Int J Odontostomatol (225), Rev Dent Chile (185) and Rev. Clin. Periodoncia Implantol. Rehabil. Oral (145). The most used keywords were periodontal disease, cavity, and dental implant. The institutions with most authors were Universidad de Chile (702), Universidad de Valparaíso (179) and Universidad de La Frontera (160). CONCLUSION: There is an increase in the quantity of journals, number of articles, authors and institutions who publish in periodical chilean peer-reviewed dental journals. Future research should focus on research design, and quality of the evidence published in those journals, and evaluate what kind of impact indexation in international databases would have

How sample size influences research outcomes

Sample size calculation is part of the early stages of conducting an epidemiological, clinical or lab study. In preparing a scientific paper, there are ethical and methodological indications for its use. Two investigations conducted with the same methodology and achieving equivalent results, but different only in terms of sample size, may point the researcher in different directions when it comes to making clinical decisions. Therefore, ideally, samples should not be small and, contrary to what one might think, should not be excessive. The aim of this paper is to discuss in clinical language the main implications of the sample size when interpreting a study.

O cálculo amostral faz parte dos estágios iniciais de realização de um estudo epidemiológico, clínico ou laboratorial. Há indicações éticas e metodológicas para o seu emprego na elaboração de um trabalho científico. Duas pesquisas, realizadas com a mesma metodologia obtendo resultados equivalentes, e que diferem apenas no tamanho da amostra, podem apontar para diferentes direções no processo de tomada de decisão clínica. Portanto, as amostras estudadas idealmente não devem ser pequenas e, ao contrário do que pode-se pensar, não devem ser excessivas. O objetivo desse artigo é discutir, numa linguagem clínica, as principais implicações do tamanho das amostras na interpretação de um estudo.

Bibliometric analysis of scientific articles published in Brazilian and international orthodontic journals over a 10-year period.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at describing the profiles of Brazilian and international studies published in orthodontic journals. METHODS: The sample comprised 635 articles selected from two scientific journals, i.e., Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics and American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, which were analyzed at three different intervals over a 10-year period (1999 - 2004 - 2009). Articles were described in terms of knowledge domain, study design, and country of origin (or state of origin for Brazilian papers). RESULTS: The most frequent study designs adopted in international studies were cohort (23.9%) and cross-sectional (21.7%) designs. Among Brazilian papers, cross-sectional studies (28.9%) and literature reviews (24.6%) showed greater frequency. The topics most often investigated in international articles were dental materials (17%) and treatment devices (12.4%), with the latter topic being addressed by 16% of the Brazilian publications, followed by malocclusion, with 12.6%. In all cases, the most frequent countries of origin coincided with the countries of origin of each journal. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the studies analyzed featured a low level of scientific evidence. Moreover, the findings showed that journals tend to publish studies produced in their own country of origin, and that there are marked discrepancies in the number of papers published by different Brazilian states.

Research training in dental undergraduate curriculum in Chile / Formación en investigación en las mallas curriculares de odontología en Chile

Research plays a central role in professional training in dentistry. There is a clear recommendation to include a minimum training in biomedical research at undergraduate level. In Chile, there is no standardized curriculum structure including research training for undergraduate students. Objective: To describe the presence of research courses in the undergraduate dental curriculum in Chile during 2014. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study. The curriculum for all Chilean universities teaching dental careers and updated during 2014 were analyzed. Results: The dental curriculum for twenty Chilean universities was analyzed. On average, each university has 4.05+/-2.06 research courses (semesterly) from which 1+/-0.92 are thesis courses. In the private universities, these numbers were 4.64+/-1.91 and 1.18+/-0.87 respectively. Meanwhile, these numbers were 3.33+/-2.12 and 0.78+/-0.97 respectively in the traditional universities. Sixty percent of universities have thesis or research project courses. Conclusion: There is a disparate presence of research courses in the undergraduate dental curriculum in Chile, with a higher presence in private institutions. However, this does not actualize a greater scientific production by them.

La investigación juega un rol central en la formación del profesional en Odontología. Existe una clara recomendación de incluir en el pregrado una cantidad mínima de formación en investigación biomédica. En Chile no existe una estructura curricular estandarizada que incluya investigación a alumnos de pregrado. Objetivo: Identificar la presencia de asignaturas de investigación en las mallas curriculares de las carreras de odontología dictadas en Chile para el año 2014. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, la unidad de análisis correspondió a las mallas curriculares de la carrera odontología, de todas las universidades dictantes en Chile y actualizadas al año 2014. Resultados: Se analizaron las mallas curriculares de las carreras de odontología de 20 universidades chilenas. En promedio cada universidad tiene 4,05+/-2,06 ramos (semestrales) de investigación y de los cuales 1+/-0,92 son ramos de tesis. En las universidades privadas estas cifras son 4,64+/-1,91 y 1,18+/-0,87 respectivamente, mientras que en las tradicionales fueron de 3,33+/-2,12 y 0,78+/-0,97 respectivamente. El 60 por ciento de las universidades tiene algún ramo de tesis o proyecto de investigación. Conclusión: Existe una dispar presencia de ramos de investigación en los programas curriculares de odontología en Chile, con una mayor presencia en instituciones privadas. Sin embargo, esto no se materializa en una mayor producción científica por parte de ellas.

Bibliometric analysis of scientific articles published in Brazilian and international orthodontic journals over a 10-year period

Objective: This study aimed at describing the profiles of Brazilian and international studies published in orthodontic journals. Methods: The sample comprised 635 articles selected from two scientific journals, i.e., Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics and American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, which were analyzed at three different intervals over a 10-year period (1999 - 2004 - 2009). Articles were described in terms of knowledge domain, study design, and country of origin (or state of origin for Brazilian papers). Results: The most frequent study designs adopted in international studies were cohort (23.9%) and cross-sectional (21.7%) designs. Among Brazilian papers, cross-sectional studies (28.9%) and literature reviews (24.6%) showed greater frequency. The topics most often investigated were dental materials (17%) and treatment devices (12.4%) in international articles, with the latter topic being addressed by 16% of the Brazilian publications, followed by malocclusion, with 12.6%. In all cases, the most frequent countries of origin coincided with the countries of origin of each journal. Conclusions: The majority of the studies analyzed featured a low level of scientific evidence. Moreover, the findings showed that journals tend to publish studies produced in their own country of origin, and that there are marked discrepancies in the number of papers published by different Brazilian states. .

Objetivo: determinar o perfil das publicações nacionais e internacionais nos periódicos de Ortodontia. Métodos: foram avaliados 635 artigos da Revista Dental Press de Ortodontia e Ortopedia Facial e American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, em três tempos distintos, dentro de um intervalo de 10 anos (1999, 2004 e 2009), caracterizando as áreas de conhecimento, os delineamentos utilizados e identificando países e estados brasileiros com maior produção científica. Resultados: os delineamentos dos estudos internacionais mais utilizados foram estudos de coorte (23,9%) e transversal (21,7%). Em estudos nacionais, destacam-se os delineamentos transversais (28,9%) e revisão de literatura (24,6%). Nas publicações internacionais, as categorias temáticas mais pesquisadas foram materiais dentários (17%), além de dispositivos de tratamento (12,4%); essa mesma categoria esteve presente em 16% das publicações nacionais, e a má oclusão dentária em 12,6%. A nacionalidade das publicações mais observada foi a do próprio país de origem do periódico. Conclusões : a maioria dos artigos publicados refere-se a estudos de menor potencial para estabelecer evidências científicas. Além disso, a situação detectada ilustra a propensão das revistas publicarem os artigos produzidos dentro de seu país de origem, bem como as disparidades entre os estados do Brasil quanto ao número de publicações. .

Bibliometrics study on authorship trends in periodontal literature from 1995 to 2010.

BACKGROUND: Biomedical research has grown considerably in the last few decades, and the authorship characteristics of the dental literature as a whole and of its specialty fields has changed significantly. Unfortunately, the bibliometrics of the periodontal literature have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the bibliometrics of periodontal literature, assessing the geographic origin, study design, and topics investigated in periodontal research published from 1995 to 2010. METHODS: Articles published in periodontal journals during 1995 to 2010 were retrieved through hand search. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied. The following variables were extrapolated from each article: number of authors, study design, topic investigated, financial support, and geographic origin. The general linear model assessed the influence of independent variables on number of authors per article, and χ(2) test assessed the statistical difference of the variables over years 1995 to 2010. RESULTS: A total of 2,260 articles were reviewed; 2,076 met the inclusion criteria. The number of authors per article increased (P <0.001) from 4.0 (1995) to 5.1 (2010). The proportion of articles published from North America and Europe decreased (P <0.001) from 84.3% (1995) to 58.6% (2010), whereas for Asia and South America the article proportion increased (P <0.001) from 13.8% (1995) to 40% (2010). Research targeting prevention and treatment of periodontal disease is decreasing (P <0.001) in favor of implant-related research. Governmental research funding is increasing (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Periodontal research significantly changed during the last 15 years.