Clinical Outcomes after Median Arcuate Ligament Release in Patients Responsive to Celiac Plexus Block.

PURPOSE: To determine if symptom relief with celiac plexus block (CPB) is associated with favorable clinical outcomes after median arcuate ligament release (MALR) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from January 2000 to December 2021. Fifty-seven patients (42 women, 15 men; mean age, 43 years [range, 18-84 years]) with clinical and radiographic features suggestive of median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous CPB for suspected MALS. Clinical outcomes of CPB and MALR surgery were correlated. Adverse events were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines. RESULTS: CT-guided percutaneous CPB was successfully performed in all 57 (100%) patients with suspected MALS. A cohort of 38 (67%) patients showed clinical improvement with CPB. A subset of 28 (74%) patients in this group subsequently underwent open MALR surgery; 27 (96%) responders to CPB showed favorable clinical outcomes with surgery. There was 1 (4%) CPB-related mild adverse event. There were no moderate, severe, or life-threatening adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who responded to CPB were selected to undergo surgery, and 96% of them improved after surgery.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pain Management.

The diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer has become a standard role for the endoscopic oncologist. Pancreatic cancer can produce disabling abdominal pain, and the medical management of this pain is often challenging. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac ganglia neurolysis serve as an alternative or adjunct for pain control in these patients. There remains a great deal of practice variability with regard to techniques and approaches. This article summarizes the latest scientific evidence and highlights contemporary best practice advice for these procedures.

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) with vs without bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with less than 5% 5-year survival. Inoperable patients often present with pain. Randomized controlled trial have shown that endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) improves pain control. It is usually performed by injecting bupivacaine followed by absolute alcohol around the celiac axis. STUDY DESIGN: Single center, randomized, double blind controlled trial of EUS-CPN with and without bupivacaine in patients with inoperable malignancy (pancreatic or other) involving the celiac plexus. The study was approved by research ethics board with approval number of 2022-9969, 21.151 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04951804). DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that bupivacaine is superfluous and may actually reduce pain control by diluting the neurolytic effect of alcohol. Bupivacaine is also potentially dangerous in that it may produce serious adverse events such as arrythmias and cardiac arrest if inadvertently injected intravascularly. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial is designed to assess whether bupivacaine is of any value during EUS-CPN.

Celiac plexus block combined with 125I seeds for refractory epigastric pain from abdominal malignancies: a retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of celiac plexus block (CPB) combined with 125I seeds implantation (ISI) for refractory epigastric pain from abdominal malignancies. METHODS: The data of 81 patients with refractory epigastric pain [visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 4] from abdominal malignancies were collected in this retrospective case-control study. Group A (n = 40) was treated with CPB alone, while Group B (n = 41) underwent CPB combined with ISI. The primary study endpoints were the VAS score, quality of life (QoL), and local tumor control (LTC) rate. The secondary endpoints were complications, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The VAS scores at week 2 (T2), week 4 (T4), week 8 (T8), and week 12 (T12) in both groups were significantly lower compared with the pretreatment values (all P < 0.01). VAS scores in Group B showed a sustained decrease, especially for "mild pain" and "moderate pain," while the VAS scores in Group A rebounded at T8 and T12 (both P < 0.01). The QoL in Group B improved significantly from T4 until T12, which better than that at T12 in Group A (all P < 0.01). The LTC rates at T8 were 35.0% and 92.7% in Groups A and B, respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.01). Group B had a slightly lower complication rate and a slightly longer median PFS/OS than group A, but neither was statistically different (P = 0.09 and P = 0.99, respectively). CONCLUSION: CPB combined with ISI performs more sustained pain relief (up to 12 weeks) compared to CPB alone, and ultimately improves the patients' QoL.

Nursing Cooperation Pattern for Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Abdominal Pain Undergoing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis.

Context: Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) at a late stage often suffer from severe abdominal pain due to the invasion of celiac plexus, and the analgesics they receive often have intolerable side effects. Endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-guided CPN) can have a good therapeutic effect. Objective: The study intended to evaluate the ability of two nursing cooperation patterns to reduce patients' pain, decrease operation times, increase operational efficiency, and increase nurses' satisfaction, for patients with advanced PC and abdominal pain who received EUS-guided CPN. Design: The research team designed a retrospective controlled study. Setting: The study took place at the Shenzhen People's Hospital of the Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University in Shenzhen, China, and at the Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University in Shanghai, China. Participants: Participants were 40 patients with advanced PC who received EUS-guided CPN at one of the two hospitals between January 2019 and January 2020. Intervention: Twenty participants at Changhai Hospital received the traditional nursing cooperation pattern and became the control group, and 20 participants at the Shenzhen People's Hospital received the new nursing cooperation pattern and became the intervention group. Outcome Measures: The study measured clinical data, nursing measures, diagnostic significance, and key points for the two patterns as well as compared the effects of the new nursing cooperation method to that of traditional nursing. If the measurement data met the requirements for normality, the team used the two independent sample t-test for the intergroup comparisons. If normality wasn't satisfied, the team used medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for expression and the rank sum test for the intergroup comparisons. Counting data were expressed using the constituent ratio, and team used the chi-square test for comparisons between groups. P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The operations were successful, and no complications occurred. No significant difference existed in the pain scores between the control group and the intervention group (P > .05), while a significant difference occurred in the nurses' operation times and satisfaction. Not only were the scores for operation times for the control group (97) and the intervention group (59) significantly different, but also the nurses' satisfaction was significantly higher for the intervention group postintervention, at 83.35 ± 5.25, than for the control group, at 62.25 ± 8.18 (P < .001). Such a new nursing cooperation method could assist in patient's rehabilitation and increase nurses' satisfaction. Conclusions: The new nursing cooperation method for patients with advanced PC and abdominal pain undergoing EUS-guided CPN can reduce operation time and improve nurses' satisfaction.

Percutaneous retrocrural versus ultrasound-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis for refractory pancreatic cancer pain.

We report a successful case of fluoroscopic percutaneous retrocrural coeliac plexus neurolysis (PRCPN) for pancreatic cancer pain refractory to endoscopic ultrasound-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN). A 55-year-old man with upper abdominal pain due to end-stage pancreatic cancer underwent EUS-CPN. Although CT revealed distribution of the contrast medium with neurolytic agent around the left and cephalic sides of the coeliac artery, the pain did not improve and became even more severe. PRCPN was performed, resulting in the drastic improvement of pain immediately. PRCPN should be considered when EUS-CPN is not effective.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in pancreatic cancer-associated pain: different technical approaches in three challenging cases.

Abdominal pain is severe in the vast majority of patients with pancreatic cancer. In some cases, chronic use of analgesics markedly reduces quality of life due to side effects. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis is a procedure that controls cancer-associated pain in this population and consists of injecting a neurolytic agent around or within the celiac plexus. In this report, we present three cases with different technical approaches for celiac plexus neurolysis.

EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreas cancer - Finally established or still under review?

Patients with pancreas cancer must deal frequently with intractable and refractory pain. Endoscopic ultrasound guided-celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) has been the most studied and used therapeutic technique aimed to destroy the pain fibres that allow the pancreas to communicate with the central nervous system. A neurolytic agent, most commonly ethanol, is optimally spread around the celiac axis in order to reduce pain and mitigate narcotic requirements. This can be performed early to prevent the spiral of pain and medication use, or more historically as salvage therapy. Different techniques to best administer the ethanol for effective EUS-CPN are still being debated. New EUS-guided injection techniques with radiofrequency, radioactive, and/or chemotherapeutic agents need more study.

Computed tomography-guided single celiac plexus neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided single celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) with the injection of a neurolytic agent into the celiac plexus in one session (CT-guided single CPN). METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web were searched for English or Japanese articles published up to February 2022, which reported findings about patients who underwent CT-guided single CPN. The outcome measures assessed in the systematic review and meta-analysis were the pain measurement scales from 0 to 10 before and after the intervention and the rate of minor and major complications. RESULTS: The pooled pain measurement scales at pre-intervention and 1- or 2-, 7-, 30-, 60-, 90-, and 180-day post-intervention was 6.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.77-9.46, I2 = 98%), 2.31 (95% CI 2.31-4.44, I2 = 92%), 2.84 (95% CI 1.39-5.79, I2 = 95%), 3.36 (95% CI 1.66-6.77, I2 = 98%), 3.19 (95% CI 1.44-7.08, I2 = 59%), 3.87 (95% CI 1.88-7.97, I2 = 0%), and 3.40 (95% CI 3.02-3.83, I2 = not applicable), respectively. The pooled minor complication rates of diarrhea, hypotension, nausea or vomiting, and pain associated with the procedure were 18% (95% CI 8-37%, I2 = 45%), 16% (95% CI 2-58%, I2 = 76%), 6% (95% CI 2-16%, I2 = 1%), and 7% (95% CI 2-21%, I2 = 17%), respectively. There was no major complication in the included studies. CONCLUSION: CT-guided single CPN can be performed safely and provides immediate analgesic efficacy although the amount of heterogeneity is characterized as large. Further investigation of its long-term analgesic efficacy is required.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of celiac plexus neurolysis for abdominal pain associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been developed as adjunctive therapy to medical management (MM) of abdominal pain associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain updated and more accurate evidence on the efficacy of additional types of CPN, including endoscopic ultrasound-guided CPN (EUS-CPN). METHODS: On March 16, 2021, we performed searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for original randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We defined the primary outcome as a standardized pain intensity score with a range of 0-10, and evaluated the mean difference between the CPN + MM and MM groups at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment. We used a random-effects model to synthesize the mean differences across RCTs. RESULTS: We selected 10 RCTs involving 646 individuals. The synthesized mean difference in the pain intensity score between the CPN + MM and MM groups was -0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.09 to -0.07) (p = 0.034) in favor of CPN + MM at 4 weeks, -0.46 (95%CI: -1.00 to 0.08) (p = 0.081) at 8 weeks, and - 1.35 (95%CI: -3.61 to 0.92) (p = 0.17) at 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis of CPN demonstrates its efficacy for managing abdominal pain at 4 weeks. Although there are various limitations, when abdominal pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer is poorly controlled with MM alone, CPN should be an option even if the duration of effect is short-lived, taking into account the absence of serious adverse events.

Robotic computed tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis: our experience of technique and outcomes.

Aim: We report the use of robot assistance for computed tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for the first time. Materials & methods: Four patients of upper abdominal cancer with intractable pain despite opioids were positioned prone on the PET-computed tomography scanner, which measured the accurate coordinates for the entry, depth and angle of the target point. The robot positioned its arm over the patient in accordance with the set needle path. The physician manually inserted needle through it and injected 20 ml of 0.75% alcohol after dye confirmation. Results: Significant reduction in pain scores and oral morphine consumption were observed in patients during 3 months follow-up. Conclusion: The robot precisely orients and helps in accurate placement of the needle through the robotic arm.

Efficacy of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in combination with EUS-guided celiac ganglia neurolysis for pancreatic cancer-associated pain: a multicenter prospective trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) in combination with EUS-guided celiac ganglia neurolysis (EUS-CGN) for pancreatic cancer-associated pain. METHODS: This multicenter prospective trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000031228). Fifty-one consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer-associated pain who presented at one of five Japanese referral centers between February 2018 and March 2021 were enrolled. EUS-CGN was added in cases of visible celiac ganglia. The primary endpoint was effectiveness, defined as a decrease in the numerical rating scale (NRS) by ≥ 3 points. NRS data were prospectively acquired at 1 week after the procedure to evaluate its effectiveness and the extent of pain relief. RESULTS: The technical success rates of EUS-CPN and EUS-CGN were 100% and 80.4%, respectively. The overall efficacy rate was 82.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 71.2-90.5, P < 0.0001]. The complete pain relief rate was 27.4%. The adverse events rate was 15.7%. The average pain relief period was 72 days. The efficacy rate was higher in the EUS-CPN plus EUS-CGN group than in the EUS-CPN alone group. EUS-CPN plus EUS-CGN was superior to EUS-CPN alone for achieving complete pain relief (P = 0.045). EUS-CGN did not improve the average length of the pain relief period. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-CPN combined with EUS-CGN is safe, feasible, and effective for pain relief in patients with pancreatic cancer. The patients who received additional EUS-CGN had a better short-term response. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: UMIN000031228.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided neurolysis in advanced pancreatic cancer: current status.

Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis with patients often presenting with locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic disease. A significant proportion of patients have visceral pain due to perineural infiltration or coeliac plexus involvement by the tumour. This pain is difficult to control and may become refractory to conventional pain management. Therefore, coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been proposed to ablate the neuronal transmission pathway of pain permanently. CPN is recommended for those who have uncontrolled pain, are experiencing unacceptable opioid adverse effects or are receiving escalating doses of analgesics. It is not known whether CPN performed at diagnosis as the first-line treatment ('early') would impact short-term and long-term pain control and quality of life. NICE has recommended (2018) a randomised trial comparing early endoscopic ultrasound-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) with on-demand EUS-CPN in pancreatic cancer. In this context, we will review the current evidence on its clinical benefits.

EUS-CGN versus EUS-CPN in pancreatic cancer: A qualitative systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Comparison between endosonographic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided celiac ganglia neurolysis (CGN) and EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) in pain management for pancreatic cancer has engendered controversy. To analyze the effectiveness and safety of EUS-CGN and figure out whether EUS-CGN is better than EUS-CPN, a qualitative systematic review was conducted. METHODS: Studies were searched from Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE up to April 2020. We only included studies with full-text and in English and assessed study quality with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We recorded details of study design, participants, procedure performed, protocol of follow-up, pain response, quality of life, survival, and adverse events. The study was conducted under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement 2009. RESULTS: Five studies involving 319 patients were included. Short-term pain response rates ranged from 65.0% to 88.46% in EUS-CGN group and most studies reported its superiority over EUS-CPN. As for adverse events, the incidence of transient hypotension and gastrointestinal symptoms seemed comparable, while results of initial pain exacerbation varied among studies. Besides, EUS-CGN might provide a shorter survival. CONCLUSION: EUS-CGN can be safely performed while it may shorten survival. In terms of short-term pain response, EUS-CGN is better than EUS-CPN while no conclusion of long-term pain control can be drawn.

Celiac Plexus Block - An Old Technique with New Developments.

BACKGROUND: Celiac plexus block (CPB) is an interventional technique known to be effective in the management of abdominal pain caused by pancreatic cancer. OBJECTIVE: To review the journey of CPB as an interventional analgesic technique from its inception to its current status in the field of cancer pain management. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive review. METHODS: PubMed database was searched for celiac plexus block, celiac plexus neurolysis, and pancreatic cancer pain relief. Randomized control trials and case series with more than 10 patients were included. A second search was done from the references of all the included articles to add studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria which were missed in the first broad search. RESULTS: A total of 44 studies were included in this literature review. Available evidence through the years was categorized based on the imaging technique used to guide needle insertion and studies were tabulated based on study design, the number of patients included, the technique of CPB, and the conclusions drawn. LIMITATIONS: Meta-analysis of the available studies was not done because of heterogeneous nature of studies. CONCLUSION: Over the years, the majority of clinical trials have focused on fluoroscopy-guided CPB. Computed tomography-guided blockade of celiac plexus is the next choice among pain physicians and percutaneous ultrasound-guided CPB is a relatively new technique. The data generated over the years does not point to a single technique being the gold standard for CPB and choice of technique may be guided by the individual's preference, familiarity with the technique, and institutional practice.

Single-Center Review of Celiac Plexus/Retrocrural Splanchnic Nerve Block for Non-Cancer Related Pain.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Celiac plexus and retrocrural splanchnic nerve (CP/RSN) blocks are widely used for cancer-related abdominal pain, but there is limited literature on their efficacy for non-cancer related pain. Our aim was to determine the indications and effectiveness of CT-guided CP/RSN blocks performed on patients with abdominal pain from non-cancer related sources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT-guided CP/RSN blocks for non-cancer related abdominal pain from 2011-2020 were retrospectively reviewed for patient demographics, procedure details, duration of pain relief, and complications. Effective blocks were defined as patient-reported pain relief or decrease in opioid use lasting 2 or more days for temporary blocks and 14 or more days for permanent blocks. RESULTS: Of 72 CT-guided CP/RSN blocks for non-cancer related abdominal pain, 48 (67%) were effective for a mean of 51 days (median 14, range 2-700). Of the 18 permanent blocks, 9 (50%) were effective for a mean of 111 days (median 90, range 14-390). Of the 54 temporary blocks, 39 (72%) were effective for a mean of 37 days (median 9, range 2-700). Indications included postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome/dysautonomia (77% effective, 20/26), pancreatitis (86% effective, 12/14), postsurgical pain (62% effective, 8/13), median arcuate ligament syndrome (70% effective, 7/10), chronic pain syndrome (20% effective, 1/5), gastroparesis (80% effective, 4/5), and renal cystic disease (33% effective, 1/3). For postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome /dysautonomia, pancreatitis, post-surgical pain, and MALS, there were no statistically significant differences in effectiveness between celiac vs. splanchnic blocks in groups matched by indication and intended duration (temporary/permanent). CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided CP/RSN blocks can effectively manage non-cancer related abdominal pain, though there is discrepancy in efficacy between temporary and permanent blocks.

Clinical Response to Celiac Plexus Block Confirms the Neurogenic Etiology of Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response of median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) symptoms, including postprandial pain, nausea, and vomiting, to celiac plexus block (CPB) and correlate the response with arterial anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-institution, retrospective cohort of clinically diagnosed MALS patients, 96 patients (female, 75; male, 21; mean age, 27 years) underwent 103 computed tomography‒guided percutaneous CPB procedures. Imaging, procedural, and clinical reports were reviewed. Primary outcomes evaluated were technical success, change in self-reported pain score, and change in nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Computed tomography imaging before the procedure was available for 81 of 96 patients and demonstrated findings of celiac artery compression in 22 of 81 (27%) patients. Technical success was achieved in 102 of 103 cases. No major adverse events and 1 moderate adverse event were reported. The postprandial pain score decreased in 86 (84%) patients, and the mean score decreased from 6.3 to 0.9 points (P < .001). The prevalence of postprandial nausea decreased from 37.9% to 11.6% (P < .001) and that of vomiting decreased from 15.5% to 4.9% (P = .019). No differences were noted in pain relief after CPB between patients with and without celiac artery compression (P = .745). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a clinical diagnosis of MALS, a large majority reported pain relief and decreased gastrointestinal symptoms after CPB. Pain relief did not correlate with the presence of celiac arterial abnormalities. This supports neuropathy as the primary etiology of MALS and suggests that the absence of celiac stenosis should not be used as an exclusion criterion.