The effect of play distraction on anxiety before premedication administration: a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The majority of children scheduled to undergo surgery experience substantial anxiety in the preoperative holding area before induction of anesthesia. Pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing perioperative anxiety are paradoxically a source of stress for children themselves. Midazolam is frequently used as premedication, and the formula of this drug in Turkey is bitter. We aimed to assess the role of distraction in the form of playing with play dough (Play-Doh) on reducing premedication anxiety in children. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Preoperative holding area. PATIENTS: One hundred four healthy children aged 3 to 7 years scheduled to undergo elective surgery were enrolled into the study. INTERVENTIONS: All children routinely receive sedative premedication (oral midazolam) before anesthesia. Children were randomized to 2 groups to receive either play dough (group PD) (n=52) or not (group C) (n=52) before administration of oral premedication. MEASUREMENTS: Children's premedication anxiety was determined by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS). MAIN RESULTS: The difference in mYPAS scores between groups at T0 (immediately after entering the preoperative holding area) was not significant (P=.876). Compared with group C, group PD was associated with lower mYPAS scores at T1 and T2 (P<.001). In group PD, mYPAS scores were significantly lower at both T1 and T2 as compared with the scores at T0 (P<.001); they were similar between T1 and T2 (P>.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that distraction in the form of playing with play dough facilitated administration of oral midazolam in young children.

Attitudes and program preferences of African-American urban young adults about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

We elicited attitudes about, and service access preferences for, daily oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) from urban, African-American young men and women, ages 18-24 years, at risk for HIV transmission through their sexual and drug-related behaviors participating in eight mixed-gender and two MSM-only focus groups in Atlanta, Georgia. Participants reported substantial interest in PrEP associated with its perceived cost, effectiveness, and ease of accessing services and medication near to their homes or by public transportation. Frequent HIV testing was a perceived benefit. Participants differed about whether risk-reduction behaviors would change, and in which direction; and whether PrEP use would be associated with HIV stigma or would enhance the reputation for PrEP users. This provides the first information about the interests, concerns, and preferences of young adult African Americans that can be used to inform the introduction of PrEP services into HIV prevention efforts for this critical population group.

Motivators, concerns, and barriers to adoption of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men in HIV-serodiscordant male relationships.

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that may facilitate or impede future adoption of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men in HIV-serodiscordant relationships. This qualitative study utilized semistructured interviews conducted with a multiracial/-ethnic sample of 25 gay and bisexual HIV-serodiscordant male couples (n=50 individuals) recruited from community settings in Los Angeles, CA. A modified grounded theory approach was employed to identify major themes relating to future adoption of PrEP for HIV prevention. Motivators for adoption included protection against HIV infection, less concern and fear regarding HIV transmission, the opportunity to engage in unprotected sex, and endorsements of PrEP's effectiveness. Concerns and barriers to adoption included the cost of PrEP, short- and long-term side effects, adverse effects of intermittent use or discontinuing PrEP, and accessibility of PrEP. The findings suggest the need for a carefully planned implementation program along with educational and counseling interventions in the dissemination of an effective PrEP agent.

[Anaesthesiological experience and factoid public information - effects, interactions and possible strategies for perioperative stress reduction]. / Vorinformationen und Vorerfahrungen - ihre Auswirkung, Interaktionen und Prävention.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative stress influences perioperative complications. Their severity is influenced by advanced information and previous experience. This study evaluates the emotional effects of these factors. METHODS: In a prospective observational study we documented existing anaesthesiological pre-information and previous experience of 461 patients (255 w/206 m) individually. In addition, we recorded the affective emotional condition of each patient before and after the premedication visit via a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a test of current stress (KAB). RESULTS: 248 patients had previous anaesthesiological pre-information. Of those 61 were of a negative nature. These patients showed a significantly higher level of stress and anxiety compared to those with positive information. 41 of 388 patients reported bad experiences with increased anxiety and stress. The premedication visits caused a significant attenuation of the overall stress level in patients with negative experience/information. CONCLUSION: During the individual premedication visit, patients should be asked directly about negative pre-information and perioperative experience. Thus the conversation can be customised to the individual stress factors and show empathy as well. Independent of any medical intervention, this approach can be an effective contribution to stress reduction.

Efficacy of two oral premedicants: midazolam or a low-dose combination of midazolam-ketamine for reducing stress during intravenous cannulation in children undergoing CT imaging.

BACKGROUND: Pain, anxiety and fear of needles make intravenous cannulation extremely difficult in children. We assessed the efficacy and safety of oral midazolam and a low-dose combination of midazolam and ketamine to reduce the stress and anxiety during intravenous cannulation in children undergoing computed tomography (CT) imaging when compared to placebo. METHODS: Ninety-two ASA I or II children (1-5 years) scheduled for CT imaging under sedation were studied. Children were randomized to one of the three groups. Group M received 0.5 mg x kg(-1) midazolam in 5 ml of honey, group MK received 0.25 mg x kg(-1) midazolam mixed with 1 mg x kg(-1) ketamine in 5-ml honey and group P received 5-ml honey alone, orally. In 20-30 min after premedication, venipuncture was attempted at the site of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream. Sedation scores and venipuncture scores were recorded. Primary outcome of the study was incidence of children crying at venipuncture (venipuncture score of 4). RESULTS: Significantly more children cried during venipuncture in placebo group compared to the other two groups (19/32 (59%) in group P vs 1 each in groups M and MK, (P < 0.001) (RR 2.37, 95% CI 1.55-3.63). In 20-30 min after premedication, group P had more children in sedation score 1 or 2 (crying or anxious) compared to the other two groups (P < 0.05). At this time, group MK showed more children in calm and awake compared to group M (P = 0.02). At venipuncture, group P had more children in venipuncture score 3 or 4 (crying or withdrawing) compared to group M or MK (P < 0.05), while groups M and MK were comparable. CONCLUSION: A low-dose combination of oral midazolam and ketamine or oral midazolam alone effectively reduces the stress during intravenous cannulation in children undergoing CT imaging without any adverse effects. However, the combination provides more children in calm and quiet state when compared to midazolam alone at venipuncture.

[Apical ballooning syndrome in a 57-year-old woman during premedication for general anaesthesia]. / Zespól balotujacego koniuszka u 57-letniej chorej w trakcie premedykacji do znieczulenia ogólnego.

Apical ballooning after sudden emotional stress is a new syndrome characterised by abrupt onset of angina-like chest pain, ST-segment elevation, wall motion abnormalities involving the lower anterior wall and apex without significant coronary artery stenosis. We present a case of a 57-year-old woman with apical ballooning syndrome which occurred during premedication the general anaesthesia. We also found an increased B-type natriuretic peptide level in this patent--the finding not reported previously in the literature.

Preferences for shared decision making in chronic pain patients compared with patients during a premedication visit.

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that patients' outcomes improve if they are involved in shared decision making (SDM). A chronic pain clinic or premedication visit could be adequate settings for the implementation of SDM. So far, the patients' preference for involvement in decision making and their desire for information have not been tested in anesthesiological settings. METHODS: A group of chronic pain patients was compared with a group of patients in the premedication visit with respect to SDM, the desire for information and perceived involvement in care. The autonomy preference index (API, measuring preference for involvement and desire for information) and the perceived involvement in care scale (PICS, measuring patients' perception of easier involvement by doctors and information exchange) were administered. RESULTS: In total, 190 chronic pain patients and 151 patients of premedication were included in this study. Patient of the premedication visit had significantly higher SDM scores. Desire for information was high, but there were no differences between groups. Younger patients [B (estimate) =- 0.3; 95% CI (-0.4) - (-0.1)], women (B = 10.9; 95% CI 6.3-15.4) and patients with higher educational level (B = 10.1; 95% CI 5.6-14.6) had more desire for SDM. PICS scores were basically influenced by groups: chronic pain patients felt more facilitated by doctors [B =- 0.185; 95% CI (-0.4) - (-0.1)] and had more information exchange [B =- 19.5; 95% CI (-15.8) - (-2.4)] than patients in the premedication visit. CONCLUSION: In both anesthesiological settings, the desire for information was high, but patients in the premedication visit had higher SDM scores, especially young female patients with higher educational level. Real patient-physician interaction showed that premedication patients felt less involved by doctors and had less information exchange compared with the chronic pain patients. Therefore, premedication visits should be focussed more on adequate information exchange and involvement of the patient in the shared decision making process.

Giving toys to children reduces their anxiety about receiving premedication for surgery.

Children have increased anxiety during the preoperative period. The administration of oral premedication to children is often met with apprehension, reluctance, or refusal. We sought to determine whether giving a small toy to the children would decrease the anxiety associated with taking oral premedication. This was a prospective study involving 100 children 3-6 yr of age randomized into two equal groups. The anxiety of each child was assessed using the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale. The results showed significantly less anxiety in children who received a toy before oral administration of midazolam.

[Irritable bowel syndrome: colonoscopy painful and difficult?]. / Reizdarmsyndrom: Koloskopie schmerzhaft und schwierig?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hyperalgesia induced by pelvic colon distension has been demonstrated in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this study the authors analyzed whether colonoscopy of patients with IBS is more painful and technically more demanding as compared to non-IBS patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study 639 patients (132 with IBS, 507 without IBS) who underwent colonoscopy were evaluated for sex, age, body mass index, administration of sedatives and analgesics, time for cecal intubation, intensity of pain during examination (intensity graduated 1-5), diagnosis and degree of diverticulosis, spasticity, loop formation, elongation and distortion, respectively. A statistical comparison of both patient groups was performed. RESULTS: Patients of the IBS group were significantly younger compared with patients in the control group (p < 0.001). In an age-matched comparison of both groups low pain (intensity 1) was noted in 29 (22%) of IBS patients and 82 patients (31%) in the control group. Severe pain (intensity 4 and 5) occurred in 17 (12.9%) and six (4.5%), respectively, of IBS patients and in 21 (8%) and five patients (2%), respectively, of the control group. The differences were statistically not significant (p = 0.1). Administration of analgesics occurred significantly more frequently in the IBS group (p = 0.01), however, only nine IBS patients (6.8%) and four patients without IBS (1.5%) received analgesics. All other parameters analyzed did not show significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: Regarding perception of procedure-related pain and technical problems in colonoscopy, patients with IBS do not show significant differences compared to patients without IBS.

Increasing Latino adolescents' adherence to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection: a controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the efficacy of coaching Latino adolescents with latent tuberculosis infection to adhere to isoniazid treatment. METHODS: Participants (n = 286) were randomly assigned to adherence coaching, attention control, or usual care groups. Adherence was measured via interviews and validated with urine assays. RESULTS: Coaching resulted in significant increases in adherence compared with attention and usual care groups. Bicultural adolescents were more likely to be adherent than those most or least acculturated. Age and risk behavior were negatively related to adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Coaching can increase Latino adolescents' adherence to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection and should contribute to tuberculosis control for adolescents at high risk of contracting the disease.

[Determination of indicators for non-compliance with guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis]. / Quelles sont les situations de non-conformité de l'antibioprophylaxie chirurgicale par rapport aux recommandations nationales ?

We conducted a prospective study to identify predictors of inappropriateness of surgical prophylaxis. A total of 72 surgeon-anaesthesist pairs participated in data collection. We assessed practices by addressing 5 questions: did the surgical procedure justify the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis, and was it provided? Was the correct agent used? Was the timing of prophylaxis optimal? Was the duration of prophylaxis correct? Was the dose correct? We reviewed 687 procedures, 513 (74.7%) of which were included in the analysis. The proportion of these procedures with totally compliant prescriptions was 41.7%. Of the 156 patients who received an inappropriate drug, 133 (85.3%) received a drug with a broader spectrum than that recommended. Prophylaxis lasted too long in 81 (89.0%) of the 91 patients who received prophylaxis of incorrect duration. Multivariate analysis revealed a clear association between non-compliant prophylaxis and two operation-specific factors: prosthesis implantation (with a relative risk of 2.52) and clean-contaminated operations (with a relative risk of 4.19). More than 50% of patients received inappropriate surgical prophylaxis. Non-observance of guidelines was related to factors that did not influence the infectious potential of the flora.

Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Children display a variety of behaviour during anaesthetic recovery. The purpose of this study was to study the frequency and duration of emergence behaviour in children following anaesthesia and the factors that alter the incidence of various emergence behaviour following anaesthesia. METHODS: A prospective study of children who required outpatient lower abdominal surgery was designed to determine an incidence and duration of emergence agitation. We developed a 5-point scoring scale to study the postanaesthetic behaviour in these children. The scale included behaviour from asleep (score=1) to disorientation and severe restlessness (score=5). Children were scored by a blinded observer every 10 min during the first hour of recovery or until discharge from same day surgery. RESULTS: We found 27 of 260 children experienced a period of severe restlessness and disorientation (score 5) during anaesthesia emergence. Thirty percent of the children (79/260) experienced a period of inconsolable crying or severe restlessness (score 4 or 5) following anaesthesia. The frequency of this behaviour was greatest on arrival in the recovery room, but many children who arrived asleep in the recovery room later experienced a period of agitation or inconsolable crying. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated assessments of behaviour following anaesthetic recovery are required to define an incidence and duration of emergence agitation. Emergence agitation occurs most frequently in the initial 10 min of recovery, but many children who arrive asleep experience agitation later during recovery.

[Sedative premedication is necessary for infants in anesthetic induction under the presence of mother].

We examined the necessity of sedative premedication for elective operation of childhood when induction was performed beside the mother. One hundred and nine patients (aged from 2 to 8 years) were assigned randomly to two groups; midazolam (0.5 mg.kg-1, orally, n = 56) was administered 45 min before induction in Group M, and vehicle was administered (n = 53) in Group C. The differences between the two groups about their calmness and behavior were investigated using double blind method, and analyzed according to their ages, as infants (2 to 4 years), kindergarteners (5 to 6 years) and school children (7 to 8 years). The significantly higher incidences of agitation or alertness were observed in infants of Group C (P < 0.05) and all other patients were calm and well sedated. We conclude that sedative premedication is necessary in infants even if induction is performed beside patient's mothers.

Comparative study of oral and intramuscular atropine sulphate as a premedicant in paediatric age group.

The use of atropine sulphate in the paediatric age group as a premedicant orally in a dosage of 0.02 mg/kg body weight 70 minutes prior to surgery was found to be as effective as atropine sulphate given intramuscularly 35 minutes prior to surgery in a dosage of 0.01 mg/kg body weight. This avoids the unpleasant memory of needle prick; The duration of effect as studied in the normal healthy children not subjected to surgery was found to be 2 1/2-3 hours.