Pramipexole inhibits formalin-induce acute and long-lasting mechanical hypersensitivity via NF-kB pathway in rats.

Pain is one of the most frequent causes for patients to seek medical care. It interferes with daily functioning and affects the quality of life of the patient. There is a clear need to investigate nonopioid or non-nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug alternatives for the treatment of pain. In this study, we determined the effect of acute pre- and posttreatment with pramipexole (PPX), a dopamine D2/D3 selective agonist, on formalin 1%-induced acute and long-lasting nociceptive behavior sensitivity in rats. Moreover, we sought to investigate whether the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effect induced by PPX was mediated through the nuclear factor-κB (NF-kB) signaling pathway. Moreover, acute systemic pretreatment with PPX (1 and 3 mg/kg, ip) suppressed the formalin-induced nociceptive behavior during both phases of the formalin test and the development of formalin-induced secondary mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia in both paws. Acute systemic posttreatment with PPX (3 mg/kg, ip) reverted the formalin-induced long-lasting secondary mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia. Furthermore, PPX inhibits the protein expression of NF-κB-p65 and the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1ß in the spinal cord of animals with secondary mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia induced by formalin. These data suggest that PPX has a potential role in producing anti-inflammatory activity. Moreover, the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects induced by PPX can be mediated through the NF-kB signaling pathway.

Pramipexole and Lactoferrin ameliorate Cyclophosphamide-Induced haemorrhagic cystitis via targeting Sphk1/S1P/MAPK, TLR-4/NF-κB, and NLRP3/caspase-1/IL-1ß signalling pathways and modulating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway.

BACKGROUND: The use of cyclophosphamide (CP) as a chemotherapeutic agent is limited by its major complication haemorrhagic cystitis (HC). Finding preventive, safe, and efficient treatments for such problems is extensively ongoing. OBJECTIVE: This research aims to assess the uroprotective effect of pramipexole (PPX) and/or lactoferrin (LF) against CP-induced HC, in addition to shedding light on their possible molecular targets. METHODS: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were orally administered PPX (3 mg/kg) and/or LF (300 mg/kg) for seven consecutive days, followed by a single intraperitoneal injection of CP (150 mg/kg). RESULTS: Pretreatment of CP-intoxicated rats with either PPX or LF mitigated oxidative urinary bladder damage via upregulation of the Nrf2/HO-1 signalling pathway, resulting in a significant reduction in bladder MDA and 8-OHdG levels with concomitant elevations in SOD activity and GSH content. Simultaneously, both drugs markedly halted inflammation in bladder tissue through inhibition of the TLR4/NF-κB signalling pathway, followed by a significant decrease in inflammatory cytokine levels (TNF-α and IL-6). Interestingly, the PPX/LF protocol downregulated p-p38, p-ERK1/2, Sphk1, and S1P protein expression and inhibited the NLRP3/caspase1/IL-1ß axis. PPX/LF also significantly reduced BAX and caspase-3, in addition to increasing Bcl-2 levels in bladder tissue of CP-treated animals. These biochemical findings were supported by the improvement in the histological alterations induced by CP in the urinary bladder. CONCLUSIONS: The current study verified the protective effect of PPX and LF against CP-induced HC by halting oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. The molecular mechanism underlying this protective effect may involve targeting the crosstalk among Sphk1/S1P/MAPK/NF-κB, TLR-4/NF-κB, and NLRP3/caspase-1/IL-1ß signalling pathways and modulating the Nrf2/HO-1 signalling pathway.

Effects of pramipexole on beta-amyloid1-42 memory deficits and evaluation of oxidative stress and mitochondrial function markers in the hippocampus of Wistar rat.

Oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction are two prominent pathological features and gradually understood as important pathogenic events for neurodegenerative diseases, including aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present study was aimed to explore the prolonged treatment of pramipexole (PPX) following amyloid beta (Aß1-42)-induced cognitive impairments , oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction in a Wistar rat model. We have found that PPX (1.0 mg/kg, b.wt.) improves cognitive impairments of Aß1-42-infused rats in Morris water maze. At the same time, PPX attenuated Aß1-42-induced oxidative damage and increased reduced-glutathione content level, decreased lipid peroxidation rate and suppressed the activity of acetylcholinesterase and shows antioxidant effects. Additionally, PPX treatment has shown inhibition of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production and restored mitochondrial membrane potential, oxidative phosphorylation, and enhanced ATP levels in Aß1-42 rats. Furthermore, PPX treatment reduced bioenergetics loss and dynamics alterations by upregulating PGC-1α protein level and mitigating translocation of Bax and Drp-1 to mitochondria and cytochrome-c release into the cytoplasm. PPX also increased mitofusin-2 protein expression, a basic element of mitochondrial fusion process. We conclude that remedial role of PPX in mitigating oxidative damage and mitochondrial perturbation that are modulated in Aß1-42 rats may have the propensity in AD pathogenesis.

[Gambling addiction as a side effect of low dose pramipexole in the treatment of restless legs syndrome].

Pathologic gambling is a rare but severe side effect of dopamine agonists (DA). Low dosage DA, as given when treating restless legs syndrome (RLS), has been thought only to have mild side effects. This case report describes two patients with low dosage pramipexole for RLS, who developed gambling addiction for a decade, highly affecting their quality of life. After stopping the treatment, the patients' gambling addiction ceased. Even though this is a very rare side effect, patients prescribed a DA should be informed of the risk of gambling addiction, independently of dosage.

Reorienting of pramipexole as a promising therapy for acute pancreatitis in a rat model by suppressing TLR4\NF-κB p65\NLRP3 inflammasome signaling.

Acute pancreatitis (AP), a disorder of global importance, has a growing incidence and prevalence, particularly in the Western world. Its complications include pseudocysts and chronic pancreatitis. Pramipexole (PMX), a D2/3 receptor selecting agonist used in Parkinsonism, was reported to have anti-inflammatory effects. This study explored the potential curative role of PMX in an l-arginine-induced acute pancreatitis rat model in addition to a possible mechanistic pathway. Rats were divided randomly into three groups: control, l-arginine, and l-arginine + PMX. Seven days after AP induction, rats were decapitated and estimated for serum amylase, lipase, glucose, pancreatic inflammatory mediators toll-like receptor-4, nuclear factor κ B p65, serum tumor necrosis factor-α, NOD-, LRR and pyrin domain- containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, caspase-1, interleukin 1ß, oxidative biomarkers malondialdehyde, myeloperoxidase, nitrite/nitrate, reduced glutathione, and the apoptotic marker caspase-3, with pancreatic histopathological changes. l-arginine-mediated AP was proved by elevated serum lipase and amylase and pancreatic inflammatory, oxidative, and apoptotic markers with infiltration of inflammatory cells using hematoxylin and eosin stain. PMX improved all these adverse signs of AP greatly. PMX might be considered an innovative therapy for AP due to its remarkable antioxidant, antiapoptotic, and anti-inflammatory effects, which are attributed to the suppression of the NLRP3 inflammasome and its downstream inflammatory cytokines.

Impulse control disorders associated with dopaminergic drugs: A disproportionality analysis using vigibase.

BACKGROUND: Dopamine receptor agonist drugs, which are used, for example, to treat Parkinson's disease (PD), increase the risk for impulse control disorders (ICDs), potentially resulting in devastating psychosocial consequences. It is unknown whether other drugs with dopaminergic properties also increase the risk for ICDs. This study assesses the disproportionality of reporting ICDs between drugs with dopaminergic properties and selected non-dopaminergic drugs. METHODS: A case/non-case disproportionality analysis was performed, using data from VigiBase (1968-2020). Reports on ICDs as suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were cases (n=852), and those with ADRs other than ICDs were non-cases (n=281,720). Relative reporting frequencies were expressed as adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs). Within the dopamine receptor agonists, the relationship between reporting odds ratios and dopamine receptor occupancy was explored. RESULTS: A high disproportionality was found for reporting ICDs for all dopaminergic drugs (aROR 20.4 [95% CI 17.4-24.1]) compared to non-dopaminergic drugs. In pharmacotherapeutic subgroups, a high disproportionality was found for primary dopaminergic agents used in PD (aROR 52.1 [95% CI 44.1-61.5]), and to a lesser extent for ADHD psychostimulants and antidepressants (aROR 5.8 [95% 4.1-8.3] and aROR 3.9 [95% CI 2.9-5.6], respectively). There was no difference in reporting by consumers and healthcare professionals. The highest disproportionality was found for the dopamine receptor agonists pramipexole and ropinirole. CONCLUSIONS: A signal of disproportion in ICD occurrence was found among all investigated drugs with dopaminergic properties, highlighting the importance of counselling and monitoring for ICDs when prescribing dopaminergic drugs.

Augmentation in patients with restless legs syndrome receiving pramipexole therapy: a retrospective study in a single center from China.

PURPOSE: Augmentation is a major complication of long-term pramipexole treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS). However, there have been no studies on augmentation in Chinese patients with RLS. We therefore investigated the clinical characteristics of augmentation in RLS patients treated with pramipexole in a real-world Chinese setting. METHODS: This study was an observational, retrospective assessment of 103 patients with RLS, who had been continuously treated with pramipexole for at least one month between January 2016 and December 2018 in a tertiary hospital in East China. Demographic data and disease and drug treatment information were collected from electronic medical records and telephone interviews to analyze the rate and clinical features of augmentation. Augmentation was confirmed by Max Planck Institute criteria. Comparisons were made between patients with and without augmentation. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (15%) were classified as having augmentation. Compared to RLS patients without augmentation, more patients with augmentation switched from other dopaminergic drugs (P<0.05) and had a longer duration of RLS symptoms before pramipexole treatment (P<0.05). In addition, patients with augmentation had a longer duration (P<0.05) and higher dosage (P<0.05) of pramipexole than those without augmentation. Augmentation was possibly associated with pramipexole tolerance (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The augmentation rate of the Chinese RLS patients in our study was 15%. Augmentation may be associated with switching from other dopaminergic drugs, long disease duration before pramipexole use, the dose and duration of pramipexole, and tolerance to pramipexole.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with pramipexole and levodopa vs levodopa monotherapy in patients with Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pramipexole (P) or levodopa (L) treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic method for Parkinson disease (PD) in many clinical studies. Nonetheless, the combined effects of 2 drugs for PD patients are not completely understood.The aim of this research was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of P plus L (P+L) combination therapy in the treatment of PD compared to that of L monotherapy, in order to confer a reference for clinical practice. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of P+L for PD published up to April, 2020 were retrieved. Standardized mean difference (SMD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was measured with the I2 test. Sensitivity analysis was also carried out. The outcomes of interest were as follows: the efficacy, unified Parkinson disease rating scale (UPDRS) scores, Hamilton depression rating scale score or adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs with 2171 participants were included. Clinical efficacy of P+L combination therapy was significantly better than L monotherapy (9 trials; OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.78 to 6.64, P < .00001). Compared with L monotherapy, the pooled effects of P+L combination therapy on UPDRS score were (22 trials; SMD -1.31, 95% CI -1.57 to -1.04, P < .00001) for motor UPDRS score, (16 trials; SMD -1.26, 95% CI -1.49 to -1.03, P < .00001) for activities of daily living UPDRS score, (12 trials; SMD -1.02, 95% CI -1.27 to -0.77, P < .00001) for mental UPDRS score, (10 trials; SMD -1.54, 95% CI -1.93 to -1.15, P < .00001) for complication UPDRS score. The Hamilton depression rating scale score showed significant decrease in the P+L combination therapy compared to L monotherapy (12 trials; SMD -1.56, 95% CI -1.90 to -1.22, P < .00001). In contrast to L monotherapy, P+L combination therapy reduced the number of any adverse events obviously in PD patients (16 trials; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.50, P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: P+L combination therapy is superior to L monotherapy for improvement of clinical symptoms in PD patients. Moreover, the safety profile of P+L combination therapy is better than that of L monotherapy. Further well-designed, multicenter RCTs needed to identify these findings.

Increased risk for developing gambling disorder under the treatment with pramipexole, ropinirole, and aripiprazole: A nationwide register study in Sweden.

Gambling Disorder (GD) has recently been reclassified from an impulse-control disorder to a behavioural addiction and, as in other addictive disorders, the dopaminergic reward system is involved. According to neuroimaging studies, alterations within the striatal dopaminergic signalling can occur in GD. However, the findings to date are controversial and there has been no agreement yet on how the reward system is affected on a molecular basis. Within the last 20 years, there has been growing evidence for a higher risk to develop GD in response to certain dopaminergic medication. Especially the dopamine agonists pramipexole and ropinirole, and the dopamine modulator aripiprazole seem to increase the likelihood for GD. The goal of this study was to examine the association between a prescription for either of the three pharmaceuticals and a GD diagnosis in a large cross-sectional study of the Swedish population. Compared to patients with any other dopaminergic drug prescription (38.7% with GD), the diagnosis was more common in patients with a dopamine agonist prescription (69.8% with GD), resulting in an odds ratio of 3.2. A similar association was found between aripiprazole prescriptions and GD diagnoses, which were analysed within the subgroup of all patients with schizophrenia or a schizotypal, delusional, or another non-mood psychotic disorder. An aripiprazole prescription increased the likelihood of GD (88.8%) in comparison to patients without an aripiprazole prescription (71.2%) with an odds ratio of 3.4. This study contributes to the increasingly reliable evidence for an association between several dopaminergic drugs and a higher risk for developing GD. Therefore, one future research goal should be a better understanding of the neurobiology in GD to be able to design more selective dopaminergic medication with less severe side effects. Additionally, this knowledge could enable the development of pharmacotherapy in GD and other addictive disorders.

Pramipexole to Improve Cognition in Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Adults with bipolar disorder (BD) often experience neurocognitive impairment that negatively impacts functioning and quality of life. Previous trials have found that dopamine agonist agents improve cognition in healthy volunteers and that adults with BD who have stable mood and mild cognitive deficits may also benefit. We hypothesized that pramipexole, a dopamine agonist, would improve neurocognitive function in patients with BD. METHODS: We recruited 60 adults (aged 18-65 years) with a diagnosis of BD I or II for an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02397837). All had stable mood and clinically significant neurocognitive impairment at baseline. Participants were randomized to receive pramipexole (n = 31) or a placebo (n = 29), dose was initiated at 0.125 mg 2 times a day and increased to a target of 4.5 mg/d. RESULTS: At trial end, the primary outcome, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score, had not improved more in the pramipexole group (mean [SD] = 1.15 [5.4]) than in the placebo group (mean [SD] = 4.12 [5.2], Cohen's d = 0.56, P = 0.049), and mixed models, controlling for symptoms, showed no association between treatment group and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery scores. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that pramipexole is not an efficacious cognitive enhancement agent in BD, even in a sample enriched for characteristics that were associated with a beneficial response in prior work. There are distinct cognitive subgroups among adults with BD and may be related differences in neurobiology that affect response to pramipexole. Additional research to better understand the onset and nature of the cognitive deficits in people with BD will be an important step toward a more personalized approach to treatment.

Dilemma in Parkinson's Treatment; Levodopa Monotherapy May be the Best Choice.

INTRODUCTION: Several treatment strategies have been claimed for Parkinson's disease (PD) so far. However, there remains controversies over the best possible treatment. The aim of this study is to compare Levodopa monotherapy versus Pramipexole in combination with Levodopa L in patients with PD with regards to the efficacy and side effects. METHODS: Patients being treated with levodopa alone and Pramipexole add-on therapy to Levodopa were enrolled in the study. Factors regarding efficacy and side effects were assessed and analyzed between both groups by appropriate tests. RESULTS: 176 Patients were enrolled in the study. Results showed significant higher total MDS-UPDRS (worse total disease severity score) among patients being treated with Pramipexole add-on therapy which was particularly higher in parts 1 (Mentation, behavior and mood), 2 (Activity of daily living) and 3 (Motor examination) (P-values < 0.05). Psychosis global score with significantly higher frequency of hallucination and depression, statistically higher in combination therapy group compared to Levodopa monotherapy group (P-value < 0.05). Patients in the Pramipexole add-on group reported lower scores of Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (P-value < 0.05). Significant correlation was between disease duration and psychosis score among Levodopa monotherapy group (P-value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to Levodopa monotherapy, Add-on therapy with Pramipexole shows less efficiency yet more side effects. This indicates that single administration of Levodopa still remains the best available treatment for Parkinson's disease.

Lack of correlation between dyskinesia and pallidal serotonin transporter expression-induced by L-Dopa and Pramipexole in hemiparkinsonian rats.

The role of pallidal serotonergic terminals in the development of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs) in Parkinson's disease (PD) has been recently highlighted correlating pallidal serotonin transporter (SERT) expression levels with dyskinesias severity. However, the role of external globus pallidus (GPe, GP in rodents) serotonergic function in LIDs is still controversial since several studies have shown no differences in GPe serotonin (SER) and SERT levels between dyskinetic and non-dyskinetic PD patients. In addition, the increase in pallidal SERT/dopamine transporter (DAT) binding ratio obtained in positron emission tomography studies has been shown similar in both subtypes of PD patients. Based on these controversial results, further studies are required to clarify the possible involvement of GPe serotonergic activity in LIDs expression. We investigated the pallidal SER and SERT expression changes and the abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) induced by L-Dopa or the D3/D2 dopamine (DA) agonist, Pramipexole, in partial unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned rats. L-Dopa treatment led to an increment of axial (p < 0.01), limb (p < 0.01), and orolingual (p < 0.01) AIMs. However, Pramipexole treatment did not induce AIMs. The number of GP SERT-positive axon varicosities was increased in L-Dopa (p < 0.05) and Pramipexole (p < 0.01) treated rats. No differences were observed in the number of GP SERT-positive varicosities between L-Dopa and Pramipexole treatments. Our results indicate a lack of correlation between GP SERT expression levels and the development of AIMs suggesting that pallidal serotonergic fibers are not responsible for LIDs. The possible involvement of the SER system in dyskinesia may include other mechanisms.

The Efficacy and Safety of Piribedil Relative to Pramipexole for the Treatment of Early Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with early Parkinson disease (PD) frequently defer initiation of levodopa treatment to minimize long-term complications. Nonergoline dopamine agonists, such as pramipexole and piribedil, are frequent first-line therapies for early PD patients, yet limited head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence exists for dopamine agonists in this population. We therefore conducted a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched (until January 7, 2020), identifying RCTs assessing the efficacy of piribedil or pramipexole in early PD. Eligible trial data were incorporated into fixed- and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses. RESULTS: No RCTs were identified directly comparing piribedil with pramipexole, but 6 trials provided data for pramipexole versus placebo and 2 compared piribedil versus placebo, facilitating indirect comparisons. Across all time points assessed, no significant differences were found between pramipexole and piribedil for change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score from baseline. Piribedil and pramipexole demonstrated superiority relative to placebo for UPDRS II/III change at weeks 22 to 30. No significant differences were noted between the treatments at weeks 20 to 35 for anxiety, constipation, hypotension, nausea, and somnolence. Sensitivity analyses on adjustment for dose titration periods and baseline risk yielded the same pattern of results. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found for pramipexole versus piribedil in the UPDRS II/III scores from baseline in early PD, with similar safety profiles.

What drugs modify the risk of iatrogenic impulse-control disorders in Parkinson's disease? A preliminary pharmacoepidemiologic study.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated with pramipexole (PPX) and ropinirole (ROP) exhibit a higher risk of developing impulse control disorders (ICDs), including gambling disorder, compulsive shopping, and hypersexuality. The management of ICDs in PD is challenging, due to the limited availability of effective therapeutic alternatives or counteractive strategies. Here, we used a pharmacoepidemiological approach to verify whether the risk for PPX/ROP-associated ICDs in PD patients was reduced by drugs that have been posited to exert therapeutic effects on idiopathic ICDs-including atypical antipsychotics (AAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and glutamatergic modulators (GMs). METHODS: To quantify the strength of the associations between PPX/ROP and other medications with respect to ICD risk, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, gender, marital status race, psychiatric comorbidities, and use of cabergoline and levodopa. RESULTS: A total of 935 patients were included in the analysis. Use of GMs, SSRIs, and AAs was not associated with a decreased ICD risk in PD patients treated with PPX/ROP; conversely, ICD risk was significantly increased in patients treated with either GMs (Adjusted Odds Ratio, ORa: 14.00 [3.58-54.44]) or SSRIs (ORa: 3.67 [1.07-12.59]). Results were inconclusive for AAs, as available data were insufficient to compute a reliable ORa. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that some of the key pharmacological strategies used to treat idiopathic ICD may not be effective for ICDs associated with PPX and ROP in PD patients. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm, validate, and extend these findings.

Drugs-Induced Pathological Gambling: An Analysis of Italian Spontaneous Reporting System.

Pathological gambling has been reported as a direct complication of Parkinson's disease and its pharmacological treatment based on dopamine agonists. Moreover, further medications (not dopamine agonists) were associated to the occurrence of gambling disorder. We aim to analyze the spontaneous reports of gambling disorder on the whole Italian territory with a focus on Campania Region (Southern Italy) from January 1st 2002 to July 31st 2018. We analyzed gambling disorder's reports across the 2002-2018 period in the Italian spontaneous reporting database (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza-RNF), with a focus on Campania region. 94 suspected cases of gambling disorder associated to apomorphine, aripiprazole, cabergoline, levodopa, levodopa and derivatives in association with entacapone/benserazide and carbidopa, pergolide, pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine were reported into the RNF. Of these cases, two related to pramipexole and one to aripiprazole were sent to Campania Pharmacovigilance Regional Centre. Although it is widely recognized that dopamine agonists may induce behavioral disorders, Parkinson's disease is itself associated to pathological gambling, compulsive shopping and eating. Since our results could not clarify the correlation between Parkinson's disease, its pharmacological treatment and pathological gambling, in order to better define this correlation there is a need to conduct further ad hoc observational studies.

Pramipexole in the treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Several depressed patients do not respond to traditional antidepressants. Our aim was to systematically review the effectiveness and safety of pramipexole in unipolar and bipolar depression. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies on pramipexole for patients with major depressive episodes, following PRISMA guidelines. Our primary outcome measure was treatment response at endpoint. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO: CRD42018108699. RESULTS: We found five RCTs, three open-label trials and five observational studies, with 504 participants (57% women; mean age, 45.3 years; mean sample size, 39; median duration of treatment, 8 weeks; mean follow-up duration, 45 weeks; mean maximum dose, 1.62 mg). We found an overall short-term response rate of 52.2% and remission rate of 36.1%, and an overall long-term response rate of 62.1% and remission rate of 39.6%. In RCTs, patients treated with pramipexole had a superior response rate compared with placebo (RR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.11-2.82) and similar to SSRIs (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.44-1.95). Acceptability and tolerability were good, with nausea being the most frequent side-effect. CONCLUSION: Our study found some evidence for an effect of pramipexole for the treatment of major depressive episodes.