Impact of first- and second-line treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma on the incidence of AML/MDS and NHL--experience of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group analyzed by a parametric model of carcinogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Using a parametric carcinogenesis model, we disentangle the superimposing effects of primary and relapse therapies of Hodgkin's disease on secondary neoplasias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyze eight randomized trials of the German Hodgkin's lymphoma study group [5357 individuals, 67 secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and 97 secondary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)]. Primary therapies were divided into four groups: radiotherapy alone, moderately dosed COPP/ABVD-like chemotherapies for intermediate and advanced stages and BEACOPP escalated. RESULTS: For secondary AML/MDS, the hazards after primary therapies are proportional (maximum at 3.4 years), while the hazard after relapse therapy is more peaked (maximum at 1.8 years). Intermediate and advanced stage chemotherapy resulted in a cumulative risk of 1.5%, while the risk after BEACOPP escalated is higher (4.4%, P = 0.004) and comparable with that after relapse therapy (4.5%). For secondary NHL, there are no differences in cumulative risk between the primary therapies (2.9%), while the risk after relapse therapy is increased (6.6%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: BEACOPP escalated moderately increases the risk of secondary AML/MDS but not NHL. No differences were found between other chemotherapies of advanced stages and intermediate stages. Secondary AML/MDS occurs faster after relapse treatment than after primary treatment.

Low acute hematological toxicity during chemotherapy predicts reduced disease control in advanced Hodgkin's disease.

Chemotherapy-treated patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease (HD) differ considerably in acute hematotoxicity. Hematotoxicity may be indicative of pharmacological and metabolic heterogeneity. We hypothesized that low hematotoxicity might correlate with reduced systemic dose and thus reduced disease control. A total of 266 patients with advanced HD treated with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (COPP-ABVD) were analyzed (HD6 trial of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group). The reported WHO grade of leukocytopenia was averaged over chemotherapy cycles given and weighted with the reciprocal dose intensity of the corresponding cycle. The low and high toxicity groups were defined in retrospect as having had an averaged WHO grade of leukocytopenia 2.1, respectively. The independent impact of low hematological toxicity on freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was assessed multivariately adjusting for the international prognostic score for advanced HD. The results were validated in two independent cohorts [181 patients treated with COPP-ABVD (HD9-trial) and 250 patients treated with COPP-ABV-ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisone (IMEP) (HD6 trial)]. The 5-year FFTF rates were 68% for patients with high toxicity vs 47% for patients with low toxicity [multivariate relative risk (RR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-3.0, p=0.0002]. Patients with low toxicity received significantly higher nominal dose ( p=0.02) and dose intensity ( p<0.0001). This finding was confirmed in both validation cohorts (multivariate RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.8, p=0.01 and RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.01-2.26, p=0.04, respectively). Patients with low hematotoxicity have significantly higher failure rates despite higher doses and dose intensity. Hematotoxicity is an independent prognostic factor for treatment outcome. This observation suggests a strategy of individualized dosing adapted to hematotoxicity.

Does long-term application of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor adversely influence overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer? A clinical study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of long-term administration of G-CSF with regard to its impact on overall survival of patients with ovarian cancer. We report the results of a non-randomized trial on 64 patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with 6 cycles of conventional chemotherapy. Chemotherapy comprised carboplatin 400 mg/m2 and epirubicin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle and prednimustine 100 mg/m2 on days 3 to 7, every 28 days. Thirty-three patients received CEP chemotherapy with G-CSF support whereas 31 women received CEP chemotherapy alone. The schedule of G-CSF was 5 mg/kg/day subcutanously on days 8 to 21 of each cycle. The severity of reduction in white cells and neutrophil count was significantly different in the two treatment groups (p<0.05), with more toxicity in the non- G-CSF group. G-CSF users had a non significant 0.88-fold lower risk of dying from ovarian cancer (95% CI, 0.48-1.60, p=0.678). In a survival analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model, residual tumor remained as an independent prognostic factor. The increasing amount of residual tumor resulted in a 1.767-fold higher risk (95% CI, 1.23-2.53, p=0.002) of death secondary to the underlying disease. In conclusion, this trial has failed to demonstrate any negative impact on patients' overall survival for the additional use of G-CSF with platinum-based chemotherapy; our results were consistent with the beneficial effects of G-CSF treatment on cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression.

Treatment of patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma aged over 70 years with an all-oral regimen combining idarubicin, etoposide and alkylators.

In elderly patients age-specific comorbidity often reduces the possibility of administering intensive chemotherapy and of obtaining response to treatment. Therefore, chemotherapy must differ from that for non-elderly patients, while maintaining the primary goal of a complete clinical response. We treated 19 patients over the age of 70 years (median age 75 years, range 70-86) with stage II-IV high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with a combination regimen including idarubicin plus etoposide and prednimustine (or chlorambucil+prednisone), all administered orally on an outpatient basis. The therapeutic schedule included six 5-day courses of idarubicin 20 mg/sqm on day 1 (or 10 mg/sqm on days 1 and 3 in the nine patients last treated), etoposide 60 mg/sqm/12 h days 2-5, prednimustine 60 mg/sqm days 2-5, G-CSF 300 microg/day from day+7 until PMN>1000/microl. In ten patients prednimustine was replaced by chlorambucil 10 mg/sqm, days 2-5, and prednisone 50 mg days 2-5, because of non-availability of the drug. Of the 19 patients submitted to this regimen 15 (79%) obtained a clinical response: eight reached a complete response (CR), and seven a partial response (PR). Hematologic toxicity was generally mild. Only three patients had to be hospitalised for infection. Except alopecia, non-hematologic toxicities were negligible. At a median follow-up of 16 months, five of eight patients who obtained CR relapsed (median CR duration 7 months). The actuarial median survival is 34 months (range 6-46). This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of an all-oral regimen including idarubicin, plus etoposide and prednimustine (or chlorambucil+prednisone) in NHL patients aged over 70 years.

Comparison in low-tumor-burden follicular lymphomas between an initial no-treatment policy, prednimustine, or interferon alfa: a randomized study from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively in patients with follicular lymphoma and a low tumor burden three therapeutic options: delay of any treatment until clinically meaningful progression, immediate treatment with an oral alkylating agent, or treatment with a biologic response modifier, interferon alfa-2b. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma patients with a low tumor burden (n = 193) were randomly assigned to one of three arms: arm 1, no initial treatment (n = 66); arm 2, prednimustine 200 mg/m2/d for 5 days per month for 18 months (n = 64); or arm 3, interferon alfa 5 MU/d for 3 months then 5 MU three times per week for 15 months (n = 63). Clinical characteristics were similar in the three arms. RESULTS: Overall response rates with prednimustine and interferon alfa were 78% and 70%, respectively. The overall response to therapy, when deferred, was similar at 70%. With a median follow-up duration of 45 months after randomization, the median freedom-from-treatment (FFT) interval was 24 months in arm 1 and the interval of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was 40 months in arm 2 and 35 months in arm 3. The median overall survival time was not reached and the overall survival rate at 5 years was 78% in arm 1, 70% in arm 2, and 84% in arm 3. Therefore, deferred treatment does not adversely influence survival at 5 years. Patients who progressed within 1 year had a significantly shorter survival duration (median, 48 months). CONCLUSION: Delayed treatment is feasible in patients with follicular lymphoma and a low tumor burden. For patients with early progression, more intensive therapy should be considered. For others, because delay of treatment until significant clinical progression does not seem to hamper the prognosis or subsequent response to treatment, the long-term toxicity of alkylating agents can be reduced.

Combination of oral idarubicin and prednimustine in advanced breast cancer: a phase II study.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of an idarubicin-prednimustine combination in advanced breast cancer. 19 patients received idarubicin 35 mg/m2 day 1 and prednimustine 100 mg/m2 days 2-6, every 21 days. Three objective responses with a median duration of 7 months were observed. Tolerance was good. A further 23 patients were given idarubicin administered at 15 mg/m2 days 1, 2 and 3 and prednimustine at the aforementioned dosage. 8 (35%) showed an objective response (4 CRs, 4 PRs) with a median duration of 6 months. No severe toxicity was observed. Results suggest activity of idarubicin-prednimustine combinations in advanced breast cancer, and further studies are indicated since this regimen is easily administered, especially to elderly patients.

Analysis of the risk of solid tumor following Hodgkin's disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study examines the occurrence of solid tumor (ST) in relation to the different types of therapy (radiotherapy, chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy; splenectomy or splenic irradiation vs no splenectomy-no splenic irradiation) received by patients treated for Hodgkin's disease (HD). METHODS: The study included 1,045 HD patients treated at the Department of Radiation Oncology, the Institute of Radiology and the Department of Human Biopathology, Hematology Section, University of Rome, "La Sapienza", from 1972 to 1992. For 23% of the patients the follow-up period was longer than 10 years. The average follow-up period was 72 months. For a more accurate calculation of the risk of ST occurrence, the patients were first divided into 3 subgroups according to initial treatment and then according to the total treatment they had received. Moreover, to establish a probable connection between solid tumor and splenic treatment the patients were also divided into 3 subgroups (splenectomy, splenic irradiation and no splenectomy/no splenic irradiation). RESULTS: We recorded twenty-four cases of ST after initial treatment. Secondary solid tumor showed a cumulative risk of 0.2% and 13.4% at 5 and 20 years, respectively. After initial treatment with radiotherapy (RT) alone, the cumulative risk was 1.7% and 5.2% at 10 and 20 years, respectively; in the chemotherapy (CT) group, it was 2.4% and 18.1%; in the CT(+)RT group, it was 1.7% and 9%. No statistically significant differences were observed among the different types of treatment (splenectomy, splenic irradiation or no splenectomy/no splenic irradiation) as regards the occurrence of ST. According to multivariate analysis, the most important factor in the risk of ST was age (> 40). Relative risk was 5.2, p = 0.0001. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that an age of over 40 at diagnosis and treatment with CT alone greatly increase the risk of solid tumor occurrence.

Prednimustine, mitoxantrone (PmM) vs cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (COP) for the treatment of advanced low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group.

The current study was initiated to compare the anti-lymphoma activity and side-effects of prednimustine/mitoxantrone (PmM) vs cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (COP) in patients with advanced low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in way of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Two hundred and forty-six patients with stage III or IV centroblastic-centrocytic (CB-CC (Kiel-classification)) or follicle center lymphoma (FCL (REAL classification)) and centrocytic (CC) or mantle-cell-lymphoma (MCL) were randomized for therapy with either PmM or COP and are fully evaluable for response and toxicity. PmM consisted of prednimustine 100 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 and mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 /day days 1 and 2, while COP comprised cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2/day on days 1-5, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2/day on day 1 and prednisone 100 mg/m2/day on days 1-5. Both regimens were repeated for a total of six cycles followed by an additional two courses for consolidation in responding cases and a subsequent second randomization for interferon alpha maintenance vs observation only. Overall response rates were comparable with 83% complete and partial remissions after COP and 84% remissions after PmM. PmM revealed a significantly higher rate of complete remissions (36 vs 18%, P < 0.006), the majority being achieved after four courses. The more rapid and possibly also more effective reduction of the lymphoma cell mass by PmM resulted in a tendency to a longer event-free interval for patients achieving remissions after PmM as compared to COP with estimated median event-free intervals of 31 vs 14 months, respectively (P=0.04). Separate analysis of lymphoma subtypes showed a tendency to a lower rate of complete remission in CC or MCL as compared to CB-CC or FCL (16 vs 30%, P=0.12, NS) while overall response rates were in a similar range (81 vs 85%). In both subtypes, PmM induced a higher rate of complete remission while overall response rates were comparable after PmM or COP. Treatment associated side-effects comprised predominantly myelosuppression and granulocytopenia in particular which was more frequently observed after PmM than COP (43 vs 31 %, P < 0.0001). This difference was clinically irrelevant, however, since serious infectious complications were encountered in less than 3% of cycles after both regimens. COP therapy was associated with a significantly higher incidence and degree of hair loss and complete alopecia (31 vs 2%) as well as of peripheral neurotoxicity (23 vs 2%). These data show that both PmM and COP reveal a high anti-lymphoma activity in patients with advanced stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PmM appears advantageous with a higher rate of complete remissions and a better tolerability with regard to secondary side-effects. A longer follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effects of initial treatment on disease-free and overall survival and the impact on additional maintenance therapy with interferon alpha.

Total body irradiation and prednimustine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. A 9-year experience at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and toxicity of total body irradiation (TBI) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) were evaluated. METHODS: Between January 1984 and September 1992, 81 consecutive patients, 40 affected with CLL and 41 with low grade NHL, with symptomatic Stage III and IV disease, were treated with TBI followed by prednimustine. TBI was given with a 6 MV linear accelerator, applying two opposite alternating fields, including total body, with two fractions of 15 cGy given per week (3-day interval). A total dose of 150 cGy was given over 5 weeks. Six to nine courses of prednimustine (100 mg/m2 orally for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks) was administered 2 months after TBI treatment as consolidation therapy. RESULTS: Of 40 patients with CLL, 18 (Group I; median age 58.5 years) were younger than 65 years and 22 (Group II; median age 73 years) were older. The overall response rates were 78% in Group I and 91% in Group II, with a median response time of 16.5 and 16 months, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was 72% in Group I and 73% in Group II. It was reversible in all but one heavily pretreated patient who died of progressive anemia and thrombocytopenia after TBI alone. In the 40 patients with CLL, the response rate was 85%; there were 5 complete responses (CRs) (12.5%) and 29 partial responses (PRs) (72.5%). Of the 41 patients with NHL, 29 (Group I; median age 55 years) were younger than 65 years and 12 (Group II; median age 71.5) were older. The overall response rate in both groups was 83%, with median response times of 18.5+ and 14.5+ months for Groups I and II, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was 59% in Group I, whereas it was 50% in Group II. It was reversible in all patients. Overall, in the 41 patients with symptomatic Stage III and IV low grade NHL, the response rate was 82.8%; there were 10 CRs (24.3%) and 24 PRs (58.5%). The prednimustine regimen was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, TBI given in a dose of 150 cGy in 10 fractions twice a week, followed by prednimustine, is an effective treatment for patients with CLL and patients with low grade NHL. This treatment also is effective in patients older than 65 years. The toxicity is acceptable, particularly when TBI and prednimustine are given as initial treatment. Pretreated patients should be monitored strictly.

[Treatment of advanced stage Hodgkin disease with CCNU, etoposide and prednimustine (CEP)]. / Elörehaladott stádiumú Hodgkin-kóros betegek kezelése CCNU, etoposide és prednimustine (CEP) terápiával.

The authors treated 21 advanced, pretreated Hodgkin's disease patients with CEP (CCNU, etoposide, prednimustine) polychemotherapy between March 1988 and February 1993. Complete remission was achieved in 4 patients, partial remission in 8 patients, while 9 patients were unresponsive to treatment. None of the complete responders relapsed during the follow-up period, and the median duration of remission was 24 months. The median survival for the unresponsive and partially responsive patients was less than half a year. Side-effects included gastrointestinal symptoms, myelosuppression and alopecia, but treatment-related deaths did not occur. The present data confirm the favourable impact of CEP polychemotherapy on pretreated, advanced Hodgkin's disease patients.

Continuous versus intermittent prednimustine treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Seventy-eight patients with advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphomas were randomized for treatment with prednimustine (Sterecyt) in two different schedules: either receiving continuous treatment at a dosage of 60 mg daily, or intermittent two-week courses with 200 mg daily for five days. The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and side effects of the two different schedules. Forty patients received continuous, and 38 patients intermittent treatment. Objective response was achieved in 66% of 71 evaluable patients, equally distributed between the two treatment arms. The 10-year survival rate was 20% (SE = 6%; continuous treatment) and 11% (SE = 5%; intermittent treatment), respectively (logrank p = 0.26). Median time to response, duration of response and time to progression showed no significant difference between the treatment groups. Median time on treatment was longer for patients treated continuously, probably due to more easily performed dose adjustments in such patients. There was a significant decrease of the white blood cell counts in patients who received prednimustine continuously compared with those treated according to the intermittent schedule (p = 0.02). No significant differences were found regarding the thrombocyte levels. The response rate was closely related to haematological toxicity (p = 0.01). Our results suggest that prednimustine in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas has similar effectiveness both in daily treatment and in a two-weekly intermittent schedule. Continuously given treatment may be easier to govern and, thereby, allow for higher treatment intensity. With respect to toxicity, daily doses of approximately 30-40 mg in previously untreated patients may be recommended.

Mitozantrone and prednimustine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer--a toxic regimen with low activity.

The combination of mitozantrone and prednimustine has been reported to elicit response rates of around 50% in patients with advanced breast cancer. In the present trial, either three or nine courses of this combination were given to previously untreated patients with advanced breast cancer. Mitozantrone was given at 12 mg/m2 on day 1 and prednimustine was given orally at 130 mg/m2 on days 1-5; treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. A total of 34 patients were treated; the performance status was 0-1 in 29 subjects and 2 in 5 cases. Locoregional disease only was present in 13 patients; 9 showed lung involvement; 8, liver; 3, bone; and 1, stomach involvement. A total of 10 subjects had received no prior hormone therapy. The median disease-free interval from the time of initial diagnosis was 24 months (range, 0-144 months). In all 14/23 patients exhibited an oestrogen receptor level of greater than 20 fmol. Grade 1 nausea and vomiting occurred in 16 patients and that of grade 2-3, in 11 subjects; nausea was prolonged for greater than 10 days in 7 cases. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 2 patients. The response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval, 8%-38%). The combination of mitozantrone and oral prednimustine is toxic and displays low activity.

Prednimustine combined with mitoxantrone and 5-fluorouracil for first and second-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

A total of 60 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with a combination of prednimustine (P: 110 mg/m2, days 1-5), mitoxantrone (M: 12 mg/m2, day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (F: 500 mg/m2, day 1) (PMF). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. In all 53 patients were evaluable for response. A total of 12 subjects had failed prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. In response to PMF treatment we observed 21 partial remissions and 3 complete remissions, amounting to a total response rate of 45%. The median duration of response was 39 weeks, and median survival was 56 weeks. Dose-limiting side effects were leukopenia (40 cases) and thrombocytopenia (11 patients). Nausea and vomiting was experienced by 93% of subjects; in 56% of cases it reached WHO stage II-III. Alopecia occurred in 18% of our patients. Our results suggest that PMF represents an active regimen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and yields a response rate of 45%. Considering that the majority of our patients had not received prior chemotherapy, the question remains open as to whether a 45% response rate outweighs the observed toxicity.

High risk of therapy-related leukemia and preleukemia after therapy with prednimustine, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and tamoxifen for advanced breast cancer.

Therapy-related acute non-lymphocytic leukemia or preleukemia was observed in five of 71 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with combination chemotherapy comprising prednimustine, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and tamoxifen. In this closely followed cohort of patients the cumulative risk of leukemic complications was 25.4% +/- 10.3% (+/- SE) 37 months after start of chemotherapy. The relative risk of overt leukemia was 339 (95% CI: 41-1223), as two cases were observed versus 0.0059 cases expected. The very high risk of leukemia and preleukemia observed may partly reflect the advanced age of the patients (mean, 61 years) and partly the diagnostic procedures used, which included cytogenetic screening of all patients developing refractory cytopenia. A particularly high leukemogenic effect of prednimustine or a synergism between prednimustine and other drugs used in this study cannot be excluded. In the light of the above results, the authors caution against the use of intensive combination chemotherapy with alkylating agents as in the current study in potentially curable patients with breast cancer.