Pregabalin-induced delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction occurring after 40 days of use: a case report.

Pregabalin is the first-line treatment for neuropathic pain. Cases of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions caused by pregabalin generally occur within 2 weeks of initiating medication. We report a rare case of a delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction caused by pregabalin, which was confirmed by a drug provocation test. A 72-year-old man with severe herpes zoster neuralgia developed maculopapular drug eruption covering 80% to 90% of his total body surface area after 40 days of combined multidrug analgesia. A drug provocation test for pregabalin was positive. The time interval between initiating medication and the onset of the patient's rash was the longest and he also had the largest area of skin affected compared with patients with a similar condition in previous related reports. Remaining vigilant for possible adverse cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions during treatment is important because of the long-term course of pregabalin treatment for neuropathic pain.

Efficacy and safety of pregabalin vs carbamazepine in patients with central post-stroke pain.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of pregabalin and carbamazepine in patients with central post-stroke pain (CPSP). METHODS: Patients included in the study were randomly assigned to either flexible-dose pregabalin treatment group or carbamazepine treatment group. The primary efficacy variable was face visual analog scale (F-VAS), the second efficacy assessment was used to assess the effect of treatment on mental health by Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD). RESULTS: The mean baseline pain score F-VAS was 6.47 in the pregabalin group and 6.58 in carbamazepine treatment group. F-VAS was significantly lower in the pregabalin group (1.64) than (3.94) carbamazepine treatment group after treatment. Pregabalin was significantly superior to carbamazepine in endpoint assessments on the HAMA and HAMD after treatment. F-VAS and HAMD were showed efficacy as early as week 2 and maintained for whole duration of the study. The average pregabalin dose in the 12-week study was 214.6 (150-375) mg/day. The mean dose (range) of carbamazepine received by the patients was 275.0 (200-400) mg/day. Mild or moderate, typically transient, somnolence and dizziness were the most common adverse events (AES). The differences of the side effects between the two groups were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin, but not carbamazepine, may be effective in improving F-VAS, HAMA and HAMD in patients with CPSP.

Pregabalin Does Not Increase Risk of Heart Failure Exacerbation in Patients With Pre-existing Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Through actions of calcium channel trafficking inhibition and sodium/water retention, pregabalin may increase the risk of acute heart failure (AHF). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of heart failure (HF) acute exacerbations, measured by a composite of emergency department (ED) visits, per-patient per-year (PPPY) hospitalizations, time-to first ED admission, and time-to hospitalizations in pre-existing HF patients taking pregabalin compared with those who were pregabalin-naive. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of pregabalin users with HF were propensity score-matched to pregabalin-naïve patients with HF to evaluate the composite of ED admissions or PPPY hospitalizations, time-to first ED admission, and time-to hospitalizations during the 365 days post-index. Doubly robust generalized linear regression and Cox-proportional hazard regression modeling were undertaken for analysis of differences between groups. RESULTS: The matched cohort of 385 pregabalin users and 3460 pregabalin nonusers were principally middle-aged, equally gender distributed, and primary Caucasian. Most patients were on guideline-directed HF medical therapy. The estimated cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was a hazard ratio of 1.099 (95% CI: 0.789-1.530; P = 0.58). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This large, single-center, cohort study shows pregabalin is not associated with an increased risk of AHF events in patients with pre-existing HF.

Gabapentinoids in Ireland 2010 to 2020: An observational study of trends in gabapentinoid prescribing, law enforcement drug seizures and postmortem toxicology.

AIMS: We explored trends in gabapentinoid prescribing, drug seizures and postmortem toxicology using a national pharmacy claims database, law enforcement drug seizures data and a population-based postmortem toxicology database. METHODS: Gabapentinoid prescribing rates per 100 000 eligible population (2010-2020), annual number of drug seizures involving gabapentinoids (2012-2020) and gabapentinoid detection (positive) rates per 100 postmortem toxicology case (2013-2020) were calculated. Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate longitudinal trends for gabapentin and pregabalin separately. RESULTS: Gabapentin (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.06, P < .001) and pregabalin (adjusted RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.08-1.09, P < .001) prescribing increased annually, with higher rates of pregabalin (vs. gabapentin) observed every year. Drug seizures involving pregabalin also increased over time (RR 1.54 95% CI 1.25-1.90, P < .0001). Of the 26 317 postmortem toxicology cases, 0.92% tested positive for gabapentin, and 6.37% for pregabalin. Detection rates increased for both gabapentin (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.48, P < .001) and pregabalin (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11-1.48, P < .001) between 2013 and 2020. A total of 1901 cases (7.2%) tested positive for heroin/methadone; this sub-group had a higher detection rate for pregabalin (n = 528, 27.8%) and gabapentin (n = 41, 2.2%) over the study period, with a high burden of codetections for pregabalin with benzodiazepines (peaking at 37.3% in 2018), and pregabalin with prescription opioids (peaking at 28.9% in 2020). CONCLUSION: This study raises concerns regarding the wide availability of pregabalin in Ireland, including a growing illicit supply, and the potential for serious harm arising from poly drug use involving pregabalin among people who use heroin or methadone.

Unveiling the potential of perampanel and pregabalin in addressing pentylenetetrazole-induced electrographic alterations and neurobehavioral anomalies.

Chemical kindling is broadly used experimental model to investigate novel treatments on the process of epileptogenesis and coexisting behavioral comorbidities. The current study aimed to investigate the low dose perampanel (PER) (0.125 and 0.5 mg/kg) and pregabalin (PG) (15 mg/kg) as standalone treatments and in combination on kindling-induced seizure progression with concurrent electroencephalographic alterations. Mice were subjected to pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced kindling followed by neurobehavioral assessment for anxiety-like activity and cognitive deficit through behavioral experiments. The monotherapy with PER at 0.5 mg/kg and PG at 15 mg/kg delayed the kindling process but PRP+PG yielded pronounced benefits and hindered the development of seizures of higher severity. PER+PG combination relieved the animals from anxiety-like behavior in various employed anxiogenic tests. Furthermore, the kindling-associated cognitive deficit was protected by PER+PG combination as increased alteration behavior, discrimination index and latencies to enter the dark zone were noted in y-maze, object recognition and passive avoidance tests, respectively while shorter escape latencies were noted in water maze. The brain samples of kindled mice had elevated malondialdehyde and reduced catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase enzymes while treatment with PER and PG combination shielded the mice from heightened kindling-associated oxidative stress. Overall, the findings of the present study illustrate that concurrent administration of PER and PG effectively hindered the process of epileptogenesis by protecting neuronal excitability and brain oxidative stress. The results predict the dominance of PER and PG combination over monotherapy which might serve as an effective novel combination to combat drug resistance and behavioral disorders in epileptic patients.

Delirium following pregabalin discontinuation in an individual with no psychiatric or substance use history.

We report about a man in his mid-50s who was prescribed pregabalin (150 mg/day) for neuropathic pain due to a herniated intervertebral disc. Four weeks later, he presented to the emergency room with symptoms consistent with delirium. After ruling out acute intoxication with a substance and neurological causes, collateral information from the family and review of his medical chart indicated potential discontinuation syndrome owing to pregabalin. Following the successful treatment and resolution of delirium, the patient revealed he had been consistently consuming pregabalin doses upwards of 2 g/day over the past 2 weeks, leading to the premature exhaustion of his prescription and an abrupt cessation. The case findings underscore the necessity for physicians to recognise the potential for pregabalin misuse and the associated withdrawal risks, including delirium.

Abuse and addiction in gabapentinoid drug users for neuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVE: Gabapentinoids are gamma-aminobutyric acid analogue agents used in the treatment of neuropathic pain. They are increasingly being abused to achieve euphoric and dissociative effects. This study aimed to determine drug misuse/abuse and related factors in patients who used gabapentinoids for neuropathic pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 140 patients over the age of 18. Patients were excluded from the study if they had aphasia, dementia, or diseases that led to aphasia or cooperative and cognitive dysfunction. They were also excluded if they lacked sufficient information about how long or at what dosage they had been using the drug. The Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory were used to evaluate depression and anxiety states. The patients' levels of drug abuse were determined according to the definitions provided in the terminology for misuse, abuse, and related events. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 56.78 ± 14.45 years, and 52.1% of them were females. While 57.9% of the patients used pregabalin, 42.1% of the patients used gabapentin. For the median (min-max) of the dataset, the pregabalin dose was 300 (50-600) mg/day, and the gabapentin dose was 900 (300-2,400) mg/day. Abuse was present in 17.9% of the patients. Risk factors for gabapentinoid abuse were smoking, alcohol, and antidepressant use, anxiety and depression, living alone, and drug dose and duration of use. CONCLUSIONS: Before prescribing drugs and managing the treatment process in a controlled manner, questioning patients about their risk factors can reduce the rate of abuse.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Single-dose Perioperative Pregabalin in Ureteroscopy.

PURPOSE: Ureteroscopy is a commonly performed procedure, with postoperative pain that can lead to revisits and opioid prescribing. Perioperative gabapentinoids have shown promise in decreasing pain and opioid use. We hypothesized that single-dose perioperative pregabalin would be safe and efficacious for decreasing pain after ureteroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved and registered blinded, placebo-controlled trial conducted at a single institution. Patients undergoing ureteroscopy without histories that would limit use of opioids, gabapentinoids, and nonsteroidal medications were enrolled. Either 300 mg pregabalin or placebo was administered 1 hour before ureteroscopy. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale before administration and 1 hour after surgery. Clinical factors, pain scores, a proxy for cognition, patient satisfaction, and opioid prescribing were assessed in the first 30 postoperative days. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were enrolled over a 2-year period. Patients who received pregabalin were younger than those who received placebo (median of 44 years vs 57). Postoperative pain scores were higher in those who received pregabalin (3.7 vs 2.0, P = .004), a finding that remained statistically significant when accounting for patient age and preoperative pain scores. There was no difference in the measure of cognition or in reports of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial evaluating the efficacy of single-dose perioperative pregabalin in ureteroscopy, pregabalin did not decrease postoperative pain when compared to placebo. Urologists should not routinely use this adjunctive medication in ureteroscopy, as it is unlikely to provide benefit.

Palmitoylethanolamide and acetyl-L-carnitine act synergistically with duloxetine and pregabalin in fibromyalgia: results of a randomised controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterised by a form of debilitating pain that is unresponsive to standard analgesics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of supplementing ongoing pregabalin (PGB) and duloxetine (DLX) treatment with palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) for 24 weeks in FM patients. METHODS: After undergoing three months of stable treatment with DLX+PGB, FM patients were randomised to continue the same treatment (Group 1) or to add PEA 600 mg b.i.d + ALC 500 mg b.i.d. (Group 2) for a further 12 weeks. Every two weeks throughout the study, cumulative disease severity was estimated using the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) as the primary outcome measure; the secondary outcomes were the fortnightly scores of the patient-completed revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) and the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FASmod) questionnaire. All three measures were expressed as time-integrated area under the curve (AUC) values. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty (91.5%) of the initial 142 FM patients completed the study: 68 patients in Group 1 and 62 in Group 2. Twenty-four weeks after randomisation, the Group 2 patients showed additional significant improvements in all three outcome measures. Although there was some fluctuation in both groups during the study period, the AUC values of the WPI scores steadily decreased in Group 2 (p=0.048), which also showed better outcomes in terms of the AUC values of the FIQR (p=0.033) and FASmod scores (p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomised controlled study demonstrating the effectiveness of the adding on therapy of PEA+ALC to DLX+PGB in FM patients.

Pregabalin as an effective treatment for acute postoperative pain following spinal surgery without major side effects: protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients experience considerable postoperative pain after spinal surgery. As the spine is located at the centre of the body and supports body weight, severe postoperative pain hinders upper body elevation and gait which can lead to various complications, including pulmonary deterioration and pressure sores. It is important to effectively control postoperative pain to prevent such complications. Gabapentinoids are widely used as preemptive multimodal analgesia, but their effects and side effects are dose-dependent. This study was designed to examine the efficacy and side effects of varying doses of postoperative pregabalin for the treatment of postoperative pain after spinal surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind study. A total of 132 participants will be randomly assigned to the placebo (n = 33) group or to the pregabalin 25 mg (n = 33), 50 mg (n = 33), or 75 mg (n = 33) groups. Each participant will be administered placebo or pregabalin once prior to surgery and every 12 h after surgery for 72 h. The primary outcome will be the visual analogue scale pain score, total dose of administered intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and frequency of rescue analgesic administered for 72 h from arrival to the general ward after surgery, subdivided into four periods: 1-6 h, 6-24 h, 24-48 h, and 48-72 h. The secondary outcomes will be the incidence and frequency of nausea and vomiting due to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Safety will be assessed by monitoring the occurrence of side effects such as sedation, dizziness, headache, visual disturbance, and swelling. DISCUSSION: Pregabalin is already widely used as preemptive analgesia and, unlike nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is not associated with a risk of nonunion after spinal surgery. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated the analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effect of gabapentinoids with significantly decreased risks of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. This study will provide evidence for the optimal dosage of pregabalin for the treatment of postoperative pain after spinal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05478382. Registered on 26 July 2022.

Prenatal exposure to pregabalin, birth outcomes and neurodevelopment - a population-based cohort study in four Nordic countries.

INTRODUCTION: Pregabalin is an antiepileptic drug frequently prescribed to pregnant women. Risks of adverse birth and postnatal neurodevelopmental outcomes following prenatal exposure to pregabalin are uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between prenatal exposure to pregabalin and the risks of adverse birth and postnatal neurodevelopmental outcomes. METHODS: This study was conducted using population-based registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden (2005-2016). We compared pregabalin exposure against no exposure to antiepileptics and against active comparators lamotrigine and duloxetine. We obtained pooled propensity score-adjusted estimates of association using fixed-effect and Mantel-Haenszel (MH) meta-analyses. RESULTS: The total number of pregabalin-exposed births was 325/666,139 (0.05%) in Denmark, 965/643,088 (0.15%) in Finland, 307/657,451 (0.05%) in Norway, and 1275/1,152,002 (0.11%) in Sweden. The adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) following pregabalin exposure versus no exposure were 1.14 (0.98-1.34) for major congenital malformations and 1.72 (1.02-2.91) for stillbirth, which attenuated to 1.25 (0.74-2.11) in MH meta-analysis. For the remaining birth outcomes, the aPRs were close to or attenuated toward unity in analyses using active comparators. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) contrasting prenatal pregabalin exposure versus no exposure were 1.29 (1.03-1.63) for ADHD and attenuated when using active comparators, 0.98 (0.67-1.42) for autism spectrum disorders, and 1.00 (0.78-1.29) for intellectual disability. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal exposure to pregabalin was not associated with low birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low Apgar score, microcephaly, autism spectrum disorders, or intellectual disability. On the basis of the upper value of the 95% confidence interval, increased risks greater than 1.8 were unlikely for any major congenital malformation and ADHD. For stillbirth and most groups of specific major congenital malformations, the estimates attenuated in MH meta-analysis.

Non-opioid antinociceptive drugs : risk of respiratory depression and death related to concomitant use of gabapentinoids in addition to opioids.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory depression and opioid-related death are reported when opioids are associated with gabapentinoids. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials investigating efficacy and safety of such association failed to assess these risks because of the lack of data. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the risk of respiratory depression or death during this combination in the scientific literature, including case reports or series, observational studies, and clinical trials. AREAS COVERED: PubMed®, Web of Science®, Embase®, and Google Scholar® were searched from their inception to December 2021, for original articles in English, French, and German. Data synthesis was done on a narrative approach by type of articles. EXPERT OPINION: The review included 25 articles (4 case reports, 2 cross-sectional, 3 case-control, 14 cohort studies, and 2 clinical trials). Respiratory depression or opioid-related death and co-exposure to gabapentinoids were associated in perioperative setting/chronic pain (odds ratios around 1.3) and in opioid maintenance treatment (hazard ratio 3.4). These findings are in agreement with experimental studies showing that a single dose of gabapentinoid may reverse opioid respiratory tolerance. Because the combination gabapentinoids-opioids is highly prevalent in all clinical context, all health care professionals and patients must be aware of this risk.

Safety of mirogabalin and pregabalin in Japanese patients with neuropathic pain: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the safety risks between the gabapentinoids, pregabalin, and mirogabalin in post-marketing clinical settings. We assessed reported events associated with gabapentinoid use in patients with neuropathic pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study between September 2020 and December 2020 using the community pharmacies records in Japan. The pharmacists identified new vs. prevalent users of mirogabalin and pregabalin in September 2020 and reported data regarding baseline and adverse events to the Japan Pharmaceutical Association using web-based questionnaires. The incidence of events and hazard ratio (HR) were consequently compared. RESULTS: New users of mirogabalin and pregabalin were identified (n = 1,650 and 2,244; mean age (SD): 69 (15) and 68 (16) years; women: 59% and 56%, respectively). Although serious events were not reported, a marked difference in HRs of common adverse events, including somnolence (1.6), dizziness (1.3), nausea (2.8), edema (3.1), and acetaminophen (2.0)/antidepressant (2.4) addition, was observed. CONCLUSION: No new serious safety concerns were found for mirogabalin and pregabalin use in patients with neuropathic pain, although the HR of some events indicated increased risk among mirogabalin users. However, further studies are needed as estimates for events occurring in small numbers with wide confidence intervals.

Efficacy and safety of pregabalin in eye pain: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The pregabalin is approved for the management of persistent pain. The aim of this study is to assess the advantages and disadvantages of the use of pregabalin in eye pain management. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched until January 2022 for randomized controlled trials. Randomized, double-blinded trials comparing pregabalin with placebo in eye pain management were included. The primary outcome was visual analog scale or numerical rating scale at acute (24 hours) and chronic (≥7 days after surgery) timepoints. The secondary outcomes were analgesic medication requirements and pregabalin-related complications (nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and headache). We also compared the effect of pregabalin on dry-eye syndrome. MAIN RESULTS: Six relevant articles were identified that studied the use of pregabalin as pain relief for photorefractive keratectomy (n = 2), laser epithelial keratomileusis (n = 1), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (n = 1), eyelid surgery (n = 1), and dacryocystorhinostomy (n = 1). Pregabalin was associated with a significant reduction in pain scores (95% confidence interval = -0.41 [-0.76--0.06]) 24 hours after surgical procedures. The data were insufficient to draw conclusions regarding dry eye symptoms. Because of the high heterogeneity of outcomes regarding adverse effects, there is no conclusion regarding the safety of pregabalin in eye pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin reduced acute eye pain but had no significant effect on long-term analgesia after ophthalmological surgery in adults. It had no effect on dry-eye symptoms after ocular surgery. Further studies on the safety of pregabalin in eye pain management are required to draw solid conclusions.

A Meta-Analysis Showing the Quantitative Evidence Base of Preemptive Pregabalin for Postoperative Pain from Cancer-Related Surgery.

Background and Objectives: As an adjunct to postoperative multimodal analgesic regimens, pregabalin has been reported in reducing postoperative acute pain and opioid consumption. However, there is only a small amount of evidence for preemptive pregabalin in patients undergoing cancer-related surgery. This systematic review was conducted to integrate high-quality evidence to evaluate the preemptive analgesic effects of pregabalin in cancer-related surgery. Materials and Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched in a combination of subject terms and free words. Efficacy and safety of preemptive pregabalin on postoperative pain for cancer-related surgery were evaluated by assessing resting and dynamic pain scores postoperatively, cumulative morphine equivalent consumption, time to first analgesic request, hemodynamic parameters, and the safety indicators. Results: Thirteen trials were incorporated for quantitative synthesis. The pooled results showed administration of pregabalin preoperatively is clinically significant for improving resting (weighted mean difference (WMD), -1.53 cm; 95% CI, -2.30 to -0.77) and dynamic (WMD, -1.16 cm; 95% CI, -2.22 to -0.11) pain severity scores at 2 h postoperatively and prolonging time to first analgesic request (WMD, 2.28 h; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.77) in cancer-related surgery. Preemptive pregabalin was also statistically effective in some other pain indicators but would increase the risk of pregabalin-related side effects after surgery. Conclusions: Our findings do not support the administration of pregabalin in doses larger than 300 mg when put in cancer-related surgery. Taken together, more high-quality research particularly focused on the optimal dosages and timing of pregabalin in cancer-related surgery is needed in the future to establish stronger evidence for therapeutic effects.

The safety and efficacy of gabapentinoids in the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: There are increasing concerns regarding the abusive potential of gabapentinoids putting at risk patients with neuropathic pain requiring long-term pain management. The evidence to support this is rather inconcusive. AIM: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gabapentinoids in the management of neuropathic pain with a focus on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and categorising the side effects according to the body systems they were affecting. METHOD: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycoINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO), and included RCTs to identify and critically appraise studies investigating safety and therapeutic effects of gabapentionoids in adults with neuropathic pain. Data extraction was conducted using an established Cochrane form and the risk-of-bias tool was used in the assessment of quality. RESULTS: 50 studies (12,398 participants) were included. The majority of adverse events pertained to the nervous system (7 effects) or psychiatric (3 effects) disorders. There were more adverse effects reported with pregabalin (36 effects) than with gabapentin (22 effects). Six pregabalin studies reported euphoria as a side effect, while no studies reported euphoria with gabapentin. This was the only side effect that may correlate with addictive potential. Gabapentioids were reported to significantly reduce pain compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Despite RCTs documenting the adverse events of gabapentionoids on the nervous system, there was no evidence of gabapentinoid use leading to addiction, suggesting an urgent need to design studies investigating their abusive potential.

Prevention of Pregabalin-Related Side Effects Using Slow Dose Escalation Before Surgery: A Trial in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway.

BACKGROUND: The side effects of pregabalin likely occur after the first dose. We aimed to evaluate the effect of 75 milligrams (mg) of pregabalin prescribed as an initial dose with a slow dose escalation for primary total joint arthroplasty within the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to two groups. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, and twenty-nine were assigned to each group. Group 1 (G1) received pregabalin (37.5 mg) twice on the day before surgery, as well as pregabalin 75 mg two hours pre-operatively; Group 2 (G2) received none on the day before surgery and the same dose of pregabalin at two hours pre-operatively. The primary outcome was dizziness assessed by severity; secondary outcomes included nausea, vomiting, sedation, opioid consumption, independent transfer at six hours post-operatively, time to readiness for independent transfers, time to readiness for discharge, and pain. RESULTS: At two, four, and six hours post-operatively, the proportion of patients experiencing dizziness and nausea was significantly greater in G2 than in G1, and opioid consumption was significantly greater in G2 than in G1 (P = .012). The proportion of independent transfers at six hours post-operatively was significantly greater in G1 than in G2 (P = .010). The time to readiness for independent transfers was significantly shorter in G1 than in G2 (P = .016). CONCLUSION: Prescription of pregabalin 37.5 mg twice on the day before surgery was effective in reducing early postoperative dizziness and nausea after receiving pregabalin 75 mg two hours pre-operatively. It also promoted early independent transfers and reduced opioid consumption.