Steroid-induced ocular hypertension in the pediatric age group.

PURPOSE: Comparing the effects of topical Rimexolone versus Dexamethasone and Rimexolone versus Fluorometholone on the intraocular pressure in children <13 years. METHODS: A total of 40 patients (80 eyes) undergoing bilateral recession strabismus surgery were divided into two groups. Group A included 20 children (40 eyes); for each, one eye was randomized to receive 1% Rimexolone and the fellow eye received 0.1% Dexamethasone. Group B included 20 children (40 eyes); for each, one eye was randomized to receive 1% Rimexolone and the fellow eye received 0.1% Fluorometholone. Patients received eye drops for two consecutive weeks. Preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure values for weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were measured. The ocular-hypertensive response of all patients was categorized as either high, intermediate or low (Armaly-Becker Classification). RESULTS: After a 2-week treatment for both groups, peak and maximal intraocular pressure changes were reached. Changes were significantly higher in the Dexamethasone-treated eyes than in the Rimexolone- and Fluorometholone-treated eyes, which had a comparable change. (Week 2 intraocular pressure Group A: 14.15 ± 3.23 mmHg vs 17.95 ± 4.27 mmHg; Group B: 15.1 ± 2.27 mmHg vs 15.2 ± 2.73 mmHg). In both groups, the increase was statistically significant compared to the baseline intraocular pressure (preoperative intraocular pressure Group A: 13.2 ± 3.53 mmHg vs 13.1 ± 3.43 mmHg; Group B: 12.55 ± 2.98 mmHg vs 12.15 ± 3.31 mmHg). Intraocular pressure returned to near preoperative values over the following four consecutive weeks (Week 6 intraocular pressure Group A: 12.25 ± 2.67 mmHg vs 12.55 ± 2.95 mmHg; Group B: 12.15 ± 2.8 mmHg vs 12.00 ± 2.75 mmHg). None of the patients were high responders. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone caused a higher elevation in intraocular pressure than Rimexolone and Fluorometholone in children. The ocular-hypertensive response was transient after the 2-week course.

Risk of cataract development among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-related uveitis treated with topical corticosteroids.

PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the risk of cataract development among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis treated with topical corticosteroids. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: We included 75 patients with JIA-associated uveitis observed from July 1984 through August 2005 at a single academic center. METHODS: Clinical data on these patients were collected by chart review and were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of new-onset cataract. Risk factors for cataract development were assessed with attention paid to the use of topical corticosteroids. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 4 years, the incidence of new-onset cataract was 0.04/eye-year (EY; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.09). Of the 60 eyes in 40 patients who received topical corticosteroid therapy, there was a dose-dependent increase in the rate of cataract development among eyes receiving topical corticosteroids. The incidence of cataract was 0.01/EY for eyes treated with < or = 3 drops daily and 0.16/EY (P = 0.0006 for log-rank test) for eyes treated with >3 drops daily. Among eyes receiving < or = 2 drops daily, the incidence of cataract was 0/EY (95% CI [1 sided], 0.03/EY). Presence of posterior synechiae, active uveitis, and use of topical corticosteroids at presentation were significantly associated with cataract development after controlling for confounding variables. Use of topical corticosteroids was associated with cataract formation independent of uveitis activity. Using longitudinal data analysis and controlling for duration of uveitis, presence and degree of active uveitis, and concomitant use of other forms of corticosteroids in a time-updated fashion, treatment with < or = 3 drops daily of topical corticosteroid was associated with an 87% lower risk of cataract formation compared with eyes treated with >3 drops daily (relative risk, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.69; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, topical corticosteroid use was associated with an increased risk of cataract formation independent of active uveitis or presence of posterior synechiae. However, chronic use of topical corticosteroids dosed at < or = 3 drops daily seemed to be associated with a lower risk of cataract development relative to eyes receiving higher doses over follow-up in the setting of suppressed uveitis. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Comparison of prednisolone 1%, rimexolone 1% and ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% after cataract extraction: a prospective, randomized, double-masked study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety and patient comfort of two topical steroids (prednisolone 1% and rimexolone 1%) and a topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent (ketorolac tromethamine 0.5%) after extracapsular cataract extraction. METHODS: Forty-five patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. They were assigned to receive topical treatment with either prednisolone, rimexolone or ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution after phacoemulsification for cataract extraction. On postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 14 and 28 best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment and report of the patients' comfort were assessed and compared by Friedman rank time analysis. RESULTS: Regarding the primary outcome efficacy of inflammation control the assessment of cells did not differ (p=0.165), while flare in the anterior chamber was lowest (p=0.008) in the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) group. Surface inflammation was lowest with prednisolone (p=0.002). Regarding safety, visual acuity did not differ among the groups. In the prednisolone group one patient, however, responded to steroid treatment with elevated IOP and had to be excluded. In the remaining patients IOP was even lower in the two steroidal treatment groups than with ketorolac (p=0.030). One patient receiving ketorolac had to be excluded because a corneal erosion developed. Patient comfort was highest with prednisolone (p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Ketorolac tromethamine provides good control of intraocular inflammation after cataract extraction without the risk of a steroidal IOP increase, which was also not observed under rimexolone therapy. The best surface inflammation control and patient comfort was observed with prednisolone, which remains a good choice.

Efficacy and safety of 1% rimexolone versus 1% prednisolone acetate in the treatment of anterior uveitis--a randomized triple masked study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1% rimexolone versus 1% prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension in the treatment of anterior uveitis. METHODS: A randomised triple masked, parallel comparison of rimexolone and prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspensions was carried out on 78 patients with acute, chronic and recurrent anterior uveitis. Treatment regimen included instillation of one or two drops of drug one hourly through the waking hours during the first week, two hourly in the second week, four times a day in the third week, two times a day for the first 4 days and once a day for the 3 days in the last week. The patient was clinically evaluated on the 3-4th, 7-10th, 14th, 21st and 28th days. The patient was also reviewed on the 30th day. Anterior chamber cells and flare reactions were compared for evaluating the efficacy of the drugs. RESULT: Rimexolone is as effective as prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension in the treatment of anterior uveitis. The largest difference found was 0.1 in the flare reaction (statistically insignificant; p = 0.3) and 0.2 score units (statistically significant; p = 0.01) in the cells. Overall, comparison of the drugs shows no clinical significance in the treatment of anterior uveitis by either drug. Difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) was also statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). However, three patients in the prednisolone acetate group and 1 patient from the rimexolone group showed a rise in IOP. CONCLUSION: Rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension is as effective as and safer than prednisolone acetate 1% ophthalmic suspension in the treatment of anterior uveitis.

Ocular-hypertensive and anti-inflammatory response to rimexolone therapy in children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ocular-hypertensive and anti-inflammatory response to rimexolone (116-hydroxy-16alphafluoro-6alphamethylpresdnisolone) and fluorometholone (21-deoxy-9alphafluoro-6alphamethylprednisolone) therapy in children's eyes. METHODS: With parental consent, children who underwent surgical procedures for bilateral symmetric strabismus from January 18, 2000, through November 16, 2001, were recruited. One eye was randomized to receive topical 1% rimexolone while the contralateral eye received topical 0.1% fluorometholone, 4 times daily for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressures and anti-inflammatory responses were the main outcome measures and were serially measured postoperatively for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-four children, aged from 4 to 8 years (mean [SD] age, 5.33 [1.26] years), participated in the study. Intraocular pressure increased significantly in both treatment groups compared with the preoperative values (P<.001). The mean (SD) peak intraocular pressure was significantly higher in the rimexolone-treated group, 19.7 (6.1) vs 17.6 (4.6) mm Hg (P<.001). Similarly, the mean (SD) net increase in intraocular pressure (P<.001), was also higher in the rimexolone-treated eyes, 5.9 (4.4) vs 3.9 (4.1) mm Hg (P<.001). In addition, a greater percentage of the rimexolone-treated patients had no conjunctival erythema on days 13 (11.1% vs 0.0%) and 20 (88.9% vs 55.6%) (P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: Rimexolone seems to be a more effective anti-inflammatory agent than fluorometholone. However, unlike adults, the ocular-hypertensive effect in children treated with rimexolone was higher. It would be desirable to monitor the intraocular pressure regularly when rimexolone therapy is used in children.

Lipomatosis due to chronic steroid therapy.

(1) Lipomatosis (development of non encapsulated fatty masses) is a rare complication of chronic systemic steroid therapy. (2) Epidural and mediastinal lipomatosis due to steroid therapy carries a risk of symptomatic compression. (3) A dose reduction or, if possible, cessation of systemic steroid therapy almost always improves or removes the symptoms.

Pharmacological validation of a feline model of steroid-induced ocular hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To validate pharmacologically the feline model of steroid-induced ocular hypertension. METHODS: Serial studies were conducted in domesticated adult female cats trained to accept topical ocular drug administration and pneumotonometry. To establish intraocular pressure (IOP) values for each study, measurements were performed at the same time of day for 6 consecutive days. Beginning on day 7, cats received either steroid or vehicle administered topically to both eyes three times a day for approximately 28 days. The IOP measurements were performed daily. RESULTS: After 5 to 7 days of treatment with 0.1% dexamethasone or 1.0% prednisolone acetate, IOP began to increase, reaching peak values within 2 weeks. These values were sustained throughout dosing but declined rapidly to baseline upon cessation of treatment. Maximum IOPs for the dexamethasone- and prednisolone-treated groups averaged 4.5 +/- 0.3 mm Hg (n = 12) greater than the mean IOP value obtained in vehicle-treated cats. Cats treated with 0.25% fluorometholone, 1.0% loteprednol etabonate, and 1.0% rimexolone exhibited increases of 0.6, 1.2, and 1.7 mm Hg, respectively. These values were significantly lower than those observed following treatment with dexamethasone or prednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: The ocular hypertensive effects of selected anti-inflammatory topical ocular steroids in this model are consistent with clinical findings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This feline model is a useful tool for assessing the potential IOP liability of novel anti-inflammatory steroids.

A pharmacoeconomic analysis of rimexolone for the treatment of ophthalmic inflammatory conditions.

Topical steroids are the standard first-line therapy for treating ophthalmic inflammatory conditions. However, potent ophthalmic steroids can lead to an elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP), which can result in greater medical resource utilization and increased costs. We have developed a decision analysis model from a societal perspective to evaluate the costs and consequences of the treatment of ophthalmic inflammatory conditions with two potent topical steroids: prednisolone and rimexolone. Data for the model are based on information from clinical trials, national data-bases, published literature, and responses by ophthalmologists to a questionnaire on treatment patterns for elevated IOP. Three steroid-responsive conditions are examined separately with the model: uveitis; postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery; and other ophthalmic inflammatory conditions (blepharitis, episcleritis, postoperative refractive surgery, and corneal transplant). The model evaluates patients with acute conditions versus those with chronic conditions and those with mild to moderate elevation of IOP versus those with severe elevation of IOP. Although the unit cost of rimexolone is higher than that of prednisolone, use of rimexolone leads to cost savings because the incidence of elevated IOP is decreased. If rimexolone is used instead of prednisolone for the treatment of ophthalmic inflammatory conditions, the estimated cost saved (at 1995 AWP prices) is approximately $10 million across the entire US population. The savings across the health maintenance organization population on an annualized basis is approximately $3.9 million. Even if rimexolone were priced higher than current market charges (at 130% to 150% of the AWP of prednisolone), cost savings ranging from the $2.9 million to $720,000 would accrue with use of rimexolone compared with prednisolone. However if, rimexolone were priced at 160% of the AWP of prednisolone, its use would incur an additional cost of $300,000. The primary medical resource utilized in treating elevated IOP in ophthalmic inflammatory conditions is physician visits. Medications are responsible for only one-fifth to one-third of the total cost of treating elevated IOP. This analysis indicates that rimexolone is associated with decreased medical resource utilization and cost savings to the entire healthcare system.

Control of ocular inflammation after cataract extraction with rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension in controlling intraocular inflammation after cataract extraction. SETTING: Twelve independent investigational centers in the United States METHODS: This study comprised 197 patients who had cataract extraction. Postoperatively, patients were randomized to a 2 week regimen of rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension or a placebo. Efficacy was analyzed by monitoring total anterior chamber cells and flare, other parameters of inflammation, and treatment failures. Safety was evaluated by monitoring treatment-related adverse events and intraocular pressure (IOP). RESULTS: Rimexolone 1% was clinically and statistically more effective in suppressing cell and flare than the placebo (P < .02). The overall discontinuation rate for treatment-related adverse events was 5.3% in the rimexolone group and 22.2% in the placebo group. There were no between-group differences in IOP. CONCLUSION: Rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension was safe and significantly more effective than a placebo in controlling intraocular inflammation after cataract extraction when used four times daily and continued for 2 weeks.

Intraocular pressure-raising potential of 1.0% rimexolone in patients responding to corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) elevating potential of 1.0% rimexolone and 0.1% fluorometholone alcohol ophthalmic suspensions in patients known to have responded to corticosteroids. DESIGN: In a double-masked, randomized, single-eye, crossover protocol, corticosteroid responsiveness initially was verified in 40 asymptomatic known steroid responders by challenge with either 0.1% dexamethasone sodium phosphate or 1.0% prednisolone acetate for up to 6 weeks. After a 1-month medication washout, subjects randomly received either rimexolone or fluorometholone for 6 weeks. Medications were again discontinued for 1 month, and subjects then received the alternate drug for 6 weeks. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between rimexolone and fluorometholone in the number of subjects demonstrating a 10-mm Hg increase in IOP or in the mean number of weeks required to achieve a 10-mm Hg response. Responses occurred in significantly more subjects receiving dexamethasone sodium phosphate (P = .001) or prednisolone acetate (P < .001) and in a significantly shorter interval than in subjects receiving rimexolone. CONCLUSIONS: Rimexolone has a low IOP-elevating potential, comparable to that of fluorometholone and less than that of dexamethasone sodium phosphate and prednisolone acetate.

Efficacy and safety of rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension vs 1% prednisolone acetate in the treatment of uveitis.

PURPOSE: Two multicenter studies compared the efficacy and safety of rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension (Vexol 1%, Alcon) and 1% prednisolone acetate (Pred Forte, Allergan). METHODS: Patients with acute uveitis, recurrent iridocyclitis, or chronic uveitis treatable by topical corticosteroid were enrolled. Treatment regimen was one or two drops every hour during Week 1, every two hours during Week 2, four times a day during Week 3, and once a day for the last three days. Efficacy and safety were determined on Days 3, 4, 7 to 10, 14, 21, and 28. A poststudy evaluation was conducted 36 to 72 hours after treatment was stopped. RESULTS: When anterior chamber cell and flare were measured, rimexolone 1% was found to be as effective as 1% prednisolone. The largest difference observed between treatments was 0.5 score unit, not clinically significant. There were no statistically significant differences in cell scores in either study (P > .05). No statistically significant differences in flare scores were found except at Day 28 in Study One (P = .04). Also, prednisolone was found to be more likely than rimexolone to cause a clinically significant increase (10 mm Hg or more) in intraocular pressure (1.7 times more likely in Study One, eight times more likely in Study Two). CONCLUSION: Rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension is safe and effective for the treatment of uveitis.

A high dose (up to 200 mg) tolerance and efficacy study of intra-articular rimexolone (Org 6216) in rheumatoid synovitis of the knee.

Twenty patients with classical or definite rheumatoid arthritis received one intra-articular injection of 40, 80, 120, 160 or 200 mg rimexolone (Org 6216) into one knee joint. Rimexolone was well tolerated and the incidence of side-effects was low. A beneficial effect was sustained over the study period of 94 days and a long-lasting effect was observed in 84% of the patients after one year and in 79% after 2 years. Safety parameters remained unaffected. Individual changes in adrenal response to ACTH and morning cortisol levels did not correlate with the dose or with serum levels of rimexolone. Rimexolone showed linear kinetics. The mean residence time in the intra-articular depot was 44 days (SD +/- 53) with a median of 26 days. Ninety percent was absorbed after 4 months. Outside the intra-articular depot the mean residence time was less than 0.1 days.

The long-term safety of danazol in women with hereditary angioedema.

Although the short-term safety (less than or equal to 6 months) of danazol has been established in a variety of settings, no information exists as to its long-term safety. We therefore investigated the long-term safety of danazol by performing a retrospective chart review of 60 female patients with hereditary angioedema treated with danazol for a continuous period of 6 months or longer. The mean age of the patients was 35.2 years and the mean duration of therapy was 59.7 months. Virtually all patients experienced one or more adverse reactions. Menstrual abnormalities (79%), weight gain (60%), muscle cramps/myalgias (40%), and transaminase elevations (40%) were the most common adverse reactions. The drug was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 8 patients. No patient has died or suffered any apparent long-term sequelae that were directly attributable to the drug. We conclude that, despite a relatively high incidence of adverse reactions, danazol has proven to be remarkably safe over the long-term in this group of patients.

Danazol induced pancreatitis and hepatitis.

Danazol, a C17 alkylated anabolic steroid, has been tried as a hormonomodulator in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. We report the case of a patient receiving 400 mg of danazol per day who developed mild pancreatitis associated with hepatitis, both induced by danazol.

Pseudohypertestosteronemia during danazol therapy. A case report.

Several steroid radioimmunoassay kits, particularly testosterone, cross-react with danazol, producing false elevations of serum steroid levels. A patient taking danazol simultaneously developed signs of virilization and an apparent 15-fold elevation in her serum testosterone. Discontinuation of danazol resulted in a prompt return to physical and biochemical normality.

[Occurrence of subdural hematoma closely associated with danazol administration in a patient with refractory ITP].

We reported a 34-year-old female patient with refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in whom a subacute subdural hematoma occurred without any preceding trauma during danazol administration which resulted in a marked decrease of plasma fibrinogen level. It is strongly suggested that danazol should be very carefully administered in ITP patients with serious bleeding tendency.

Benign intracranial hypertension associated with danazol.

We describe a case of benign intracranial hypertension (BIH) whose onset coincided with treatment of danazol for menorrhagia. No other causative factors were identified. Headache and visual symptoms occurring in patients treated with danazol therefore require careful assessment, so that visual failure from advanced BIH can be avoided by appropriate treatment.