Number-dependent association of potentially inappropriate medications with clinical outcomes and expenditures among community-dwelling older adults: A population-based cohort study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing and its number-dependent association (PIM = 1, 2, ≥3) with all-cause hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and medication expenditures in Beijing, China. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted to analyse PIM prescribing in community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years within the Beijing Municipal Medical Insurance Database (data from July to September 2016). The prevalence of PIMs was estimated based on the 2015 Beers Criteria. Logistic models were utilized to investigate the associations between PIM use and all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits. Generalized linear models with the logic link and gamma distribution were used to analyse associations between PIM use and medication expenditures. RESULTS: Among the 506 214 older adults, the prevalence of PIM was 38.07%. After adjusting for covariables, prescribing two and three or more PIMs was associated with increased risks of hospitalizations (PIM = 2: odds ratio [OR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.47; PIM ≥ 3: OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.32-1.63) and ED visits (PIM = 2: OR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.48; PIM ≥ 3: OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44). Exposures to two and three or more PIMs were associated with higher medication expenditures for inpatient visits (PIM = 2: incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16; PIM ≥ 3: IRR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.08-1.28). Vasodilators were the most frequent PIM prescribing group among patients who were hospitalized or had to visit the ED. CONCLUSIONS: PIMs were prescribed at a high rate among community-dwelling older adults in Beijing. Two or more PIMs were associated with increased risks of hospitalizations, ED visits, and increased inpatient medication expenditures. Effective interventions are needed to target unnecessary and inappropriate medications in older adults.

Economic and social drivers of antibiotic dispensing practices among community pharmacies in Nepal.

OBJECTIVE: To assess economic and social drivers of dispensing antibiotics without prescription by community pharmacies in Nepal. METHOD: A survey was conducted among 111 pharmacy owners and managers in five districts. Information on demographic and economic characteristics of the pharmacies (e.g. revenue and profits from antibiotics) and their inclination to sell antibiotics without a physician's prescription under various scenarios (e.g. diarrhoea in a child) was collected. Univariate analysis was conducted to assess the demographic and economic characteristics. Bivariate analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between dispensing antibiotics without prescription and economic and social factors. RESULTS: Azithromycin and amoxicillin were the most commonly dispensed antibiotics. The proportions of pharmacies reporting that they would 'most likely' or 'likely' dispense antibiotics without prescription to adult patients ranged from 36.9% (sore throat) to 67.6% (cough). The proportions for paediatric patients ranged from 62.2% (sore throat) to 80.2% (cough or diarrhoea). There was no consistent relationship between the likelihood of dispensing antibiotics and revenues, profits or the number of patients. Instead, dispensing behaviour was influenced by the pressure from the patient; the respondents were more likely to dispense antibiotics when the patient specifically asked for 'an antibiotic' rather than for 'a medicine', and 68.5% respondents ranked 'customer satisfaction' as the most important factor motivating their work. CONCLUSIONS: In Nepal, inappropriate sale of antibiotics by community pharmacists is high, particularly for paediatric patients. Additional research is needed to establish key drivers of this behaviour and to help design effective approaches to reducing AMR.

Clinical Pharmacist-Led Impact on Inappropriate Albumin Utilization and Associated Costs in General Ward Patients.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate albumin use in clinical practice remains problematic. Health-systems face continued challenges in promoting cost-appropriate use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of a clinical pharmacist-led intervention strategy targeting inappropriate albumin use in general ward patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study evaluated all adult (≥18 years) general ward patients administered ≥1 dose of albumin at a university medical center over a 2-year period. The intervention consisted of a clinical pharmacist-led strategy intervening on all albumin orders not in accordance with institutional guidelines. The primary end point was to compare inappropriate albumin utilization before and after implementation. Secondary end points compared the rates of inappropriate albumin use adjusted for hospital admission and patient-days as well as associated costs by appropriateness between study periods. RESULTS: A total of 4420 patients were screened, with 1971 (44.6%) patients meeting inclusion criteria. The clinical pharmacist strategy significantly reduced inappropriate albumin (grams) utilization by 86.0% (P < 0.001). A 7-fold reduction of inappropriate albumin administered adjusted for the number of patient admissions was found from the preimplementation period following clinical pharmacist intervention strategy implementation (415.3 ± 83.2 vs 57.5 ± 34.2 g per 100 general ward hospital admissions, respectively; P < 0.001). Also, the adjusted inappropriate albumin rate was reduced from 62.2 ± 12.3 to 8.6 ± 5.2 g per 100 patient-days in the preimplementation and postimplementation periods, respectively (P < 0.001). Annual cost savings were $421 455 overall, with $341 930 resulting from mitigation of inappropriate use. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Clinical pharmacist-led interventions significantly reduced inappropriate albumin use and costs in hospitalized patients.

Economic Evaluation of Sedative Deprescribing in Older Adults by Community Pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Sedative use in older adults increases the risk of falls, fractures, and hospitalizations. The D-PRESCRIBE (Developing Pharmacist-Led Research to Educate and Sensitize Community Residents to the Inappropriate Prescriptions Burden in the Elderly), pragmatic randomized clinical trial demonstrated that community-based, pharmacist-led education delivered simultaneously to older adults and their primary care providers reduce the use of sedatives by 43% over 6 months. However, the associated health benefits and cost savings have yet to be described. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the D-PRESCRIBE intervention compared to usual care for reducing the use of potentially inappropriate sedatives among older adults. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis from the public health care perspective of Canada estimated the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with the D-PRESCRIBE intervention compared to usual care over a 1-year time horizon. Transition probabilities, intervention effectiveness, utility, and costs were derived from the literature. Probabilistic analyses were performed using a decision tree and Markov model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: Compared to usual care, pharmacist-led deprescribing is less costly (-$1392.05 CAD) and more effective (0.0769 QALYs). Using common willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of $50 000 and $100 000, D-PRESCRIBE was the optimal strategy. Scenario analysis indicated the cost-effectiveness of D-PRESCRIBE is sensitive to the rate of deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Community pharmacist-led deprescribing of sedatives is cost-effective, leading to greater quality-of-life and harm reduction among older adults. As the pharmacist's scope of practice expands, consideration should be given to interprofessional models of remuneration for quality prescribing and deprescribing services.

Effect of pharmacist interventions on antibiotic use in the general pediatric ward.

Antibiotics are widely prescribed and often used irrationally in Chinese hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacist's influence on antibiotic use in the pediatric ward. We conducted this pre-to-post intervention study in the pediatrics of a Chinese tertiary hospital. The patients hospitalized from April to June 2018 were assigned to the pre-intervention group and those from April to June 2019 were distributed to post-intervention group. In the post-intervention stage, the pharmacist took measures to promote rational use of antibiotics and their effects were assessed. This study analyzed data of 1408 patients totally, 671 and 737 in the pre-intervention and post-intervention group respectively. The interventions of clinical pharmacist significantly reduced the rate of using antibiotics without indications (from 33.55% to 15.82%, p<0.01), percentage of inappropriate antibiotic choice (from 24.79% to 16.58%, p p<0.01), dose (from 8.55% to 4.34%, p p<0.05), combination (from 11.75% to 5.10%, p p<0.01) and prolonged duration (from 14.53% to 10.46%, p p<0.05). The mean antibiotic cost and cost/patient-day were also significantly reduced after the intervention. The ratio of average antibiotic cost saving to pharmacist time cost was 16.77:1. The pharmacist could play vital roles in optimizing antibiotic use, thus resulting in favorable clinical and economic outcomes in pediatric ward.

Drug utilization, rationality, and cost analysis of antimicrobial medicines in a tertiary care teaching hospital of Northern India: A prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: The burden of bacterial infections is huge and grossly under-represented in the current health-care system. Inappropriate use of antimicrobial medicines (AMMs) poses a potential hazard to patients by causing antibiotic resistance. This study was conducted to assess the: (i) AMM consumption and use patterns in patients attending the outpatients and inpatients of Medicine and Surgery departments of the hospital. (ii) Appropriateness of the AMM in the treatment prescribed, and (iii) cost incurred on their use in admitted patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, prospective study was conducted among inpatients and outpatients of the Medicine and Surgery departments of a tertiary care hospital of northern India. Analysis of 2128 prescriptions and 200 inpatient records was performed using a predesigned format. The use of AMMs was reviewed using anatomical therapeutic chemical classification and defined daily doses (DDDs). To evaluate the expenditure incurred on AMMs, ABC analysis was performed. RESULTS: AMMs were prescribed to 37.9% outpatients and 73% of admitted patients. The percentage encounters with AMMs was 40.6% (medicine) and 25.6% (surgery) outpatients. The total DDDs/100 patient days of AMMs in medicine and surgery were 3369 and 2247. Bacteriological evidence of infection and AMM sensitivity was present in only 8.5% of cases. Over 90% of AMMs were prescribed from the hospital essential medicines list. Most of the AMMs were administered parenterally (64.9%). Multiple AMMs were prescribed more to inpatients (84.2% vs. 4.2% outpatients). Overall, expenditure on AMM was 33% of the total cost of treatment on medicine. ABC analysis showed that 74% of the expenditure was due to newer, expensive AMM, which constituted only 9% of the AMM used. The AMM therapy was found to be appropriate in 88% of cases as per Kunin's criteria for rationality. CONCLUSION: AMMs are being commonly prescribed without confirmation of AMM sensitivity in the hospital. A large proportion of expenditure is being incurred on expensive AMM used in a few number of patients. There is a need for developing a policy for rational use of AMM in the health facility.

Estimating the Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Among Older Adults in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Inappropriate prescribing of medications is common in health care, and is an important safety concern, especially for older adults, who have a high burden of comorbidity and are at greater risk for medication-related adverse events. This study aims to estimate the extent and cost of potentially inappropriate prescribing of medications to older adults in the United States. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program data set (2014-2018). PARTICIPANTS: Older adults who were enrolled in Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program between 2014 and 2018. MEASUREMENTS: Potentially inappropriate medications were identified using the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria®. RESULTS: In 2018, 7.3 billion doses of potentially inappropriate medications were dispensed. The most common medications by number of doses dispensed were proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and tricyclic antidepressants, and the top five unique medications by reported spending were dexlansoprazole, esomeprazole, omeprazole, dronedarone, and conjugated estrogens. From 2014 to 2018, 43 billion doses of potentially inappropriate medications were dispensed, with a reported spending of $25.2 billion. CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults is both common and costly. Careful attention to potentially inappropriate medication use and deprescribing when clinically appropriate could reduce costs and potentially improve outcomes among older adults.

Effects of pharmacist intervention on polypharmacy in patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of polypharmacy in patients with type 2 diabetes revealed that medications administered according to the patient's symptoms and complaints strongly contributed to polypharmacy. We explored the effects of clinical ward pharmacy service, which evaluated the need for symptomatic treatment, therefore minimizing polypharmacy by reducing inappropriate medications. RESULTS: The number of drugs (hospitalization vs. discharge: 9 [1-17] vs. 7 [1-16], P < 0.001) and rate of polypharmacy (hospitalization vs. discharge: 75.4% vs. 61.1%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower at discharge. Since hospital admission, the number of drugs increased (n = 6, 11%), remained unchanged (n = 15, 28%), decreased by 1 drug (n = 4, 8%), decreased by 2 drugs (n = 3, 6%), and decreased by more than 2 drugs (n = 25, 47%). Daily drug costs were significantly reduced (hospitalization vs. discharge: $8.3 vs. $6.1, P < 0.001).

Cost of inappropriate antimicrobial use for upper respiratory infection in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are often prescribed inappropriately to patients with upper respiratory infection (URI) in ambulatory care settings; however, the economic burden of such prescription has not been quantitatively assessed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the additional cost of antimicrobial prescription for URI at the population level in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational survey using longitudinal claims data between 2013 and 2016 obtained from JMDC Claims Database, which contains data from 5·1 million corporate employees and family members under the age of 65 years. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescription was assessed by a panel of six infectious disease physicians according to ICD-10 code in JMDC Claims Database. Total additional cost of antibiotic prescription for URI at the national level was estimated by weighting of age-structured population data. RESULTS: The annual additional cost of inappropriate antibiotic prescription for URI was estimated at 423·6 (95% CI: 416·8-430·5) million USD in 2013, 340·9 (95% CI: 335·7-346·2) million USD in 2014, 349·9 (95% CI: 344·5-355·3) million USD in 2015, and 297·1 (95% CI: 292·4-301·9) million USD in 2016. Three classes of broad-spectrum oral antibiotics (third-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones) accounted for > 90% of the total additional cost. CONCLUSIONS: Although a decreasing trend was observed, annual additional costs of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for URI could be a substantial economic burden in Japan. Appropriately prescribing broad-spectrum oral antibiotics might be an important issue to reduce unnecessary medical costs in Japanese ambulatory care.

Antibiotic use in children hospitalised with pneumonia in Central Vietnam.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Excessive use of antibiotics has been noted in children with respiratory tract infections in Vietnam, but antibiotic use in hospitalised children is poorly documented. Antibiotic use and direct healthcare costs in children hospitalised with pneumonia in central Vietnam were assessed. METHODS: A prospective descriptive study of children under 5 years old admitted with a primary admission diagnosis of 'pneumonia' to the Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children over 1 year. RESULTS: Of 2911 children hospitalised with pneumonia, 2735 (94.0%) were classified as 'non-severe' pneumonia by the admitting physician. In total, 2853 (98.0%) children received antibiotics. Intravenous antibiotics were given to 336 (12.3%) children with 'non-severe' and 157/176 (89.2%) children with 'severe' pneumonia; those with 'non-severe' pneumonia accounted for 68.2% (336/493) of intravenous antibiotics given. Only 19.3% (95/493) of children on intravenous antibiotics were stepped down to an oral antibiotic. Cefuroxime was the preferred oral agent, and ceftriaxone was the preferred injectable agent. Hospital admission for oral antibiotics in 'non-severe' pneumonia was a major cost driver, with an average direct cost of US$78.9 per patient, accounting for 54.0% of the total hospitalisation cost in the study cohort. In addition, 336 (12.3%) children with non-severe pneumonia received intravenous antibiotics without indication, accounting for a further 23.2% of hospitalisation costs. CONCLUSION: Limiting unnecessary hospitalisation and considering early intravenous to oral step down antibiotic will reduce direct health system costs and morbidity in children with respiratory tract infections in Vietnam.

Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Deprescribing of NSAIDs in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Older adults are often prescribed potentially inappropriate medications associated with adverse health outcomes and increased health services utilization. Developing Pharmacist-led Research to Educate and Sensitize Community Residents to the Inappropriate Prescriptions Burden in the Elderly (D-PRESCRIBE), a pragmatic randomized clinical trial, demonstrated how a community pharmacist-led evidence-based educational intervention successfully empowered community-dwelling older adults and their physicians to reduce chronic use of inappropriate medications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the D-PRESCRIBE intervention for discontinuing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: Decision analysis combining decision tree and Markov state transition modeling was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of D-PRESCRIBE (NSAIDs) compared with usual care from a Canadian healthcare system perspective with a time horizon of 1 year. Data from the D-PRESCRIBE trial and published literature were used to calculate effectiveness, utilities, and costs. Reference case and scenario analyses were conducted using probabilistic modeling. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of the reference case model. RESULTS: D-PRESCRIBE (NSAIDs) was less costly (-$1008.61) and more effective (.11 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) than usual care and was the dominant strategy. At willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50 000 per QALY and $100 000 per QALY, D-PRESCRIBE (NSAIDs) incurred a positive incremental net benefit compared with usual care, suggesting it is cost-effective. Compared with the reference case, scenario analyses gave comparable QALYs with modest variation in cost estimates. CONCLUSION: For community-dwelling older adults, D-PRESCRIBE (NSAIDs) provides greater benefits at lower system costs, making it a compelling strategy to reduce the use and harms associated with chronic NSAID consumption. Our findings support reimbursing community pharmacists' clinical professional services for deprescribing inappropriate NSAIDs in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1090-1097, 2020.

Impact of pharmacist-led multidisciplinary medication review on the safety and medication cost of the elderly people living in a nursing home: a before-after study.

Objectives: Adverse drug events (ADE) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. In this study, we assessed the impact of multidisciplinary medication review (MMR) for nursing home residents on patient safety and costs incurred by the hospital and the national health service. Methods: Medical files of residents were retrospectively assessed for medications prescribed in the previous six months. A pharmacist reviewed the prescriptions and suggested modifications to the patient's medical team. Patients were followed for six months. Trivalle's ADE geriatric risk score was calculated before and after MMR, as were number of potentially inappropriate medications, and economic impact from the perspective of the health care system and the nursing home. Results: Forty-nine patients were recruited. ADE score dropped one risk level (median score of 4 before versus 1 after, p < 0.0001). The number of patients taking at least one potentially inappropriate medication decreased from 30.6% before to 6.1% after MMR (p = 0.005). A mean saving of €232 per patient was made from the nursing home perspective following MMR (p = 0.008). Conclusion: The MMR reduced the iatrogenic drug risk for elderly residents and costs from the nursing home perspective, particularly drug expenditure.

Cost analysis of potentially inappropriate medication in older hospitalized patients.

Objectives: Pubmed literature search show that the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications is a major concern in older hospitalized patients, both from a clinical and financial perspective. This study aims to identify factors associated with exposure and potentially inappropriate medication costs in older hospitalized patients and to assess the financial impact of substituting these medications with safer alternatives. Methods: We performed an observational cross-sectional study of all patients aged 75 years or older hospitalized in a university hospital (except geriatric wards) on a given day. Potentially inappropriate medications were identified using European and French guidelines. Results: A total of 365 patients were included. At least one potentially inappropriate medication was prescribed in 50.4% of these patients. This contributed 19.7% [16.1; 23.6] to the average cost of medication per patient. Substitution of these medications with recommended alternatives was cost saving: average incremental cost per patient: -3.97 € [-7.21; -1.58]. Both polypharmacy and type of ward providing care were associated with increased costs of potentially inappropriate medications. Conclusions: This study assessed the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications in older hospitalized patients and established that their substitution by alternative medications provided a cost saving.

Clinical Pharmacist-Led Impact on Inappropriate Albumin Use and Costs in the Critically Ill.

Background:Optimal albumin use in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains challenging with inappropriate use approaching 50%. No published reports have described clinical pharmacist impact aimed at mitigating inappropriate albumin use in the ICU. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of a clinical pharmacist-led intervention strategy targeting inappropriate albumin in the ICU. Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluated all adult (≥18 years) ICU patients administered albumin at an academic medical center over a 2-year period. Institutional guidelines were developed with clinical pharmacists targeting inappropriate albumin use. The primary end point was to compare inappropriate use of albumin administered before and after pharmacist intervention implementation. Secondary analyses compared the overall albumin use between study periods. In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and albumin-related costs between study periods were also compared. Results: A total of 4419 patients were identified, with 2448 (55.4%) critically ill patients included. The pharmacist-led strategy resulted in a 50.9% reduction of inappropriate albumin use (P < 0.001). The rate of inappropriate albumin use was 44.3 ± 10.5 and 5.5 ± 2.9 g per patient-day in the preimplementation and postimplementation periods, respectively (P < 0.001). Costs associated with overall and inappropriate albumin use in the ICU decreased by 34.8% and 87.1%, respectively. Total annual cost-savings was $355 393 in the ICUs. No differences in clinical outcomes were found. Conclusion and Relevance: Clinical pharmacist-led interventions reduced overall and inappropriate albumin use and costs without negatively affecting clinical outcomes.

Doctors, drugs of dependence and discipline: a retrospective review of disciplinary decisions in New Zealand, 1997-2016.

AIM: To describe disciplinary cases for inappropriate prescribing of drugs of dependence by doctors in New Zealand, 1997-2016. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of disciplinary decisions to describe characteristics of cases (setting, drugs, outcome) and doctors (sex, specialty, years since qualification). RESULTS: There were 25 disciplinary decisions involving 24 doctors. Disciplined doctors were mostly male (19;76%), working in general practice (19;76%), and older (mean 24 years in practice). Pharmacists were the most common source of notification to the authorities (6;24%); medical colleagues reported only four (16%). The alleged misconduct often involved behaviour in addition to inappropriate prescribing. In all cases the doctor was found guilty of professional misconduct. Penalties were severe: six doctors were removed from practice, 11 were suspended, and of the remainder all but one had restrictions on practice imposed. In many decisions there was no patient harm documented. CONCLUSION: Disciplinary cases for inappropriate prescribing of drugs of dependence by doctors in New Zealand are not common, but the consequences can be dire. The role of discipline in doctors with drug dependence is unclear.

Albumin Usage in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Human albumin is an expensive therapy with inappropriate use in many clinical conditions. Inappropriate use of albumin imposes a substantial economic burden on the healthcare system and society. Drug use evaluation (DUE) is one method of assessing the appropriateness of drug use which has been powered by increasing concern about the cost-effectiveness of drugs. The objective of this study is to systematically review the appropriateness of albumin utilization in Iranian hospitals. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar for articles in English and SID, Magiran, Medlib, and Irandoc for articles in Persian from 1997 to 2018. Studies on the DUE of albumin in Iranian hospitals were included in this study. Articles conducted outside Iran, editorials, letters and review articles were excluded. RESULTS: In total, eight studies were selected for the final review. The majority of the papers were conducted in Tehran. In most studies, the highest albumin consumption was related to the intensive care unit. The most frequent reasons for prescribing albumin were edema, hypoalbuminemia, volume expansion after heart surgery, ascites, cardiac surgery and cirrhosis. Of the studies included, five studies evaluated the costs of drug use. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that inappropriate use of albumin imposes a relatively high additional cost on the society. The included studies show that the percentage of inappropriate use of albumin is relatively high in Iran and this abuse is an essential problem in Iranian hospitals. Prescription based on standard guidelines could improve rational use of albumin and lead to savings in treatment costs.

Adaptation of a deprescription intervention to the medication management of older people living in long-term care facilities.

Objectives: Inappropriate prescription is a problem related to aging and deprescription could be a possible strategy. The aim of this study was to adapt the available evidence on deprescribing to the medication management of older people living in long-term care facilities. Methods: The authors carried out a bibliographic search based on the most prevalent drugs in our context to develop a specific deprescribing intervention. A committee of experts reviewed this intervention which was later validated through an interobserver variability study. Finally, the authors evaluated it in a sample of patients through a controlled before-after study. Results: The authors included 119 subjects living in a public elderly long-term care center and 122 controls living in a center with similar clinical characteristics. The authors evaluated 852 medications, identifying a total of 175 (20.5%) potentially inappropriate medications and 162 (92.5%) drugs were deprescribed (1.4 per patient). The application of the intervention meant an annual saving of 9.525.25 €. Conclusion: The implementation of a deprescribing intervention aimed at the most prevalent drugs prescribed in a particular setting improves the appropriateness of pharmacotherapy in the patients.

Economic Impact of Reducing Inappropriate Inhaled Corticosteroids Use in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: ISPOR's Guidance on Budget Impact in Practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the budget impact of restricting inappropriate inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) use according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)-guidelines indication for ICS use in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-population, taking The Netherlands as a reference case. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed and closely aligned with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research best-practice guidelines. The model estimates the impact of pharmacologic COPD maintenance treatments on clinical events (exacerbations and pneumonias) and associated healthcare utilization and costs. The current treatment mix included all maintenance treatments including long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), long-acting ß2-agonists (LABA), LABA/ICS, LABA/LAMA, and triple therapy (LABA/LAMA/ICS). We modeled a situation where 25% of patients would use ICS-containing treatments and compared this to the current Dutch situation with 60% ICS use. A 5-year time horizon with a Dutch healthcare payer's perspective was used. In sensitivity analyses, a range of values for absolute ICS reduction (20%-40%), relative risks of exacerbations and pneumonia events, and other input parameters were explored. RESULTS: Over a period of 5 years, the new treatment mix with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guideline recommended ICS, and LABA/LAMA use resulted in potential avoidance of 17 405 exacerbations and 11 984 pneumonias and accompanied savings of €84 million in the base-case scenario. Savings were consistent in various sensitivity analyses, indicating cost savings between €30 and €200 million. CONCLUSION: Reducing inappropriate ICS use and increasing use of LABA/LAMA in COPD patients could result in a reduction of exacerbations and pneumonias, corresponding with a reduction in total costs for COPD in The Netherlands.