Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper.

This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline dedicated to standardizing and optimizing perioperative care for women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The guideline was rigorously formulated by an American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Task Force of US and Canadian gynecologic surgeons with special interest and experience in adapting ERAS practices for patients requiring minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. It builds on the 2016 ERAS Society recommendations for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncologic surgery by serving as a more comprehensive reference for minimally invasive endoscopic and vaginal surgery for both benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. For example, the section on preoperative optimization provides more specific recommendations derived from the ambulatory surgery and anesthesia literature for the management of anemia, hyperglycemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Recommendations pertaining to multimodal analgesia account for the recent Food and Drug Administration warnings about respiratory depression from gabapentinoids. The guideline focuses on workflows important to high-value care in minimally invasive surgery, such as same-day discharge, and tackles controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery, such as thromboprophylaxis. In these ways, the guideline supports the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and our collective mission to elevate the quality and safety of healthcare for women through excellence in clinical practice.

Novel Technology to Capture Objective Data from Patients' Recovery from Laparoscopic Endometriosis Surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a noncontact radio sensor as an objective measurement tool to study postoperative recovery from endometriosis surgery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort pilot study. SETTING: Center for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery at an academically affiliated community hospital in conjunction with in-home monitoring. PATIENTS: Patients aged above 18 years who sleep independently and were scheduled to have laparoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of suspected endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: A wireless, noncontact sensor, Emerald, was installed in the subjects' home and used to capture physiologic signals without body contact. The device captured objective data about the patients' movement and sleep in their home for 5 weeks before surgery and approximately 5 weeks postoperatively. The subjects were concurrently asked to complete a daily pain assessment using a numeric rating scale and a free text survey about their daily symptoms. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three women aged 23 years to 39 years and with mild to moderate endometriosis participated in the study. Emerald-derived sleep and wake times were contextualized and corroborated by select participant comments from retrospective surveys. In addition, self-reported pain levels and 1 sleep variable, sleep onset to deep sleep time, showed a significant (p <.01), positive correlation with next-day-pain scores in all 3 subjects: r = 0.45, 0.50, and 0.55. In other words, the longer it took the subject to go from sleep onset to deep sleep, the higher their pain score the following day. CONCLUSION: A patient's experience with pain is challenging to meaningfully quantify. This study highlights Emerald's unique ability to capture objective data in both preoperative functioning and postoperative recovery in an endometriosis population. The utility of this uniquely objective data for the clinician-patient relationship is just beginning to be explored.

Multiple comparisons of the efficacy and safety for six treatments in Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The choice of the best therapeutic regimen for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture (AATR) remains controversial. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapeutic regimens in AATR patients using a network meta-analysis of data from clinical randomized controlled trials. MATERIAL/METHODS: The studies were abstracted from Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). RESULTS: 38 randomized controlled trials involving 2480 participants were included. The studies were published between 1981 and 2019. A total of 6 therapeutic regimens -open repair (OR), minimally invasive repair (MIR) and nonoperative treatment (non) combined with traditional standard rehabilitation (TSR) and accelerated functional rehabilitation (AFR) - were included in the literature. The treatments were ranked based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probability. In terms of the re-rupture rate, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: OR&AFR, OR&TSR, MIR&AFR, MIR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &AFR and nonoperative treatment &TSR. In terms of the wound-related complication, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&AFR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, MIR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &TSR, OR&AFR and OR&TSR. In terms of the sural nerve injury, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: non, OR and MIR. In terms of the deep venous thrombosis, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&AFR, OR&AFR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, OR&TSR, MIR&TSR and nonoperative treatment &TSR. In terms of the returning back to sport, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&TSR, OR&AFR, OR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, nonoperative treatment &TSR and MIR&AFR. CONCLUSIONS: MIR can repair the ruptured Achilles tendon and narrow the tendon gap with low risk of complications. AFR is superior to TSR without increasing the risk of rerupture. MIR&AFR is the best therapeutic regime for AATR. More RCTs focused on AATR are needed to further indicate this conclusion.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVES: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principle and minimally invasive surgery allow patients to recover faster and better postoperatively. Due to a paucity of their integration, this retrospective study aims to assess clinical outcomes of ERAS pathway in microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 72 consecutive cases were enrolled. According to their inclusion order, the former 21 cases received microendoscopy-assisted MIS-TLIF without any ERAS approach (control group), while the latter 51 participants underwent the same surgery with ERAS protocol (observation group). Perioperative parameters, including operative duration, intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay, postoperative analgesic usage and ambulatory time, were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS, back and leg), Barthel index were obtained before and at three days, one month, six months postoperatively. Modified MacNab criteria and Bridwell grading were used to assess surgical outcome and interbody fusion at one week and two years after surgery, respectively. RESULTS: Observation group had statistically improved perioperative parameters (operative duration, intraoperative EBL, length of stay, postoperative analgesic usage and ambulatory time) in comparison with control group. Remarkable decreases in VAS (back and leg) were observed continuously at three days, one month and six months post-surgery in both groups when compared with scores prior to the surgery. More significant improvement of VAS (back and leg) was found in observation group at both three days and one month postoperatively. Regarding Barthel index, despite its transient decrease at three days after surgery in control group, it showed statistical increase at postoperative one month when compared with preoperative values in both groups; moreover, its inter-groups comparison revealed much more improvement in patients receiving ERAS recommendations; while at final follow-up, it continued further increase in either group. Marginally higher proportion of patients in observation group showed perfect or good clinical outcome, as well as solid interbody fusion. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS pathway in microendoscopy-assisted MIS-TLIF has advantages of decreased operative time, reduced intraoperative haemorrhage, increased initial back pain relief, decreased length of stay, lowered analgesic usage and earlier daily activity recovery and thus, benefit postoperative rehabilitation further.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery surgical patients: one size fits all?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs aim to expedite functional recovery and improve surgical outcomes without increasing complications or cost. First championed by colorectal surgeons, ERAS protocols are now widely utilized among surgical subspecialties. The present review focuses on use of ERAS pathways in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) and risk factors for suboptimal outcomes in this population. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies across multiple fields has shown benefit to adoption of ERAS protocols. However, lack of protocol standardization among institutions, implementation of interventions as a bundle, varied compliance, and lack of study randomization collectively obscure generalizability of findings from such studies. Emerging data in fact suggest benefits may not translate equally across all populations, cautioning against indiscriminate application of protocols to all surgeries or patients. Thus applicability of ERAS protocols to the MIGS population merits close examination. SUMMARY: ERAS protocols improve postoperative outcomes, satisfaction, and cost of care for most patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. However, modifications to typical ERAS protocols may be beneficial to certain subsets of patients including patients with chronic pelvic pain, opiate dependence, or psychiatric disorders. Identification of risk factors for admission or increased hospital stay may help guide protocol modifications for at-risk groups within the MIGS population.

Survey of Postoperative Activity Guidelines After Minimally Invasive Gynecologic and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Most surgeons recommend restriction of activities after minimally invasive gynecologic and pelvic reconstructive surgery. The goal of this study was to identify and assess the postoperative guidelines gynecologists and urogynecologists provide their patients. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of physicians at a national gynecology conference in March 2018. Respondents were asked to answer questions about the typical postoperative recommendations they provide patients after gynecologic surgery as well as their postoperative prescribing habits. RESULTS: There were 418 attendees, and 135 (32%) eligible physicians completed the survey. Of respondents, 87% were specialists in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Most respondents (61%) were in academic practice. Most respondents (82%-86%) recommended specific postoperative lifting restrictions, and 49% to 52% recommended limiting lifting to a maximum of 10 lb after surgery with some variation depending on the surgical procedure performed. Many respondents (42%-56% depending on the surgical procedure) recommended that patients wait at least 2 weeks before returning to sedentary work. Male respondents and those who were in practice for more than 10 years recommended that patients return to work sooner compared with those who were in practice less than 10 years. Male respondents prescribed fewer opioids to patients after vaginal hysterectomy (P = 0.04) and vaginal prolapse repair (P = 0.03) compared with female respondents. CONCLUSIONS: After minimally invasive gynecologic or pelvic reconstructive surgery, providers recommend a wide range of postoperative restrictions and prescribe significantly different quantities of opioids during the postoperative period. This study highlights some of the recommendations with the greatest variability.

Do Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Benefit from an Enhanced Recovery Pathway?

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have been shown to reduce length of stay (LOS), complications, and costs after colorectal surgery; yet, little data exists regarding patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We hypothesized that implementation of ERP for IBD patients is associated with shorter LOS and improved economic outcomes. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective clinical database was used to identify consecutive patients from 2015 to 2017. Patients were grouped as "pre-ERP" and "post-ERP" based on the date of implementation of a comprehensive ERP. Ileostomy closures, redo pouch operations, and outpatient operations were excluded. The relationship between ERP, LOS, and secondary outcomes was assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, a total of 671 patients were included: 345 (51.4%) with Crohn's disease (CD) and 326 (48.6%) with ulcerative colitis (UC). Of these, 425 were pre-ERP (63.4%), and 246 were post-ERP (36.6%). The groups did not differ in terms of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores, comorbidities, estimated blood loss, or ostomy construction. The post-ERP group had a significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI), more patients with CD, longer operative time, and more minimally invasive surgery (MIS; all P < 0.05). The post-ERP group had a significantly shorter LOS (6 vs 4.5 days, median), whereas mean hospital costs decreased by 15.7%. There was no difference in readmissions or complications. On multivariate analysis, MIS and ERP use were both associated with a shorter LOS. CONCLUSION: Inflammatory bowel disease patients benefit from the use of ERP, demonstrating decreased LOS and costs without an increase in complications and readmissions. Enhanced recovery pathways should be routinely implemented in this often challenging patient population.

Does aggressive respiratory rehabilitation after primary nuss procedure improve pulmonary function?

OBJECTIVE: Here, we present the efficacy of an aggressive respiratory rehabilitation program that was initiated from early postoperative period, expecting to improve inspiratory volume at an early stage after primary Nuss procedure. METHODS: The study was performed as a nonrandomized controlled study undergoing primary Nuss procedure at our institute from 2016 to 2018. We evaluated 34 patients and assigned them to two groups based on whether or not they received a respiratory rehabilitation. Group A (between June 2016 and March 2018) includes patients with inspiratory training postoperatively, and group B (between April 2018 and July 2018) includes patients without training. At the time of admission, a physiatrist provided each patient with a training instruction. From day five postoperatively, the patients in group A started training for inspiration with an incentive spirometer (Coach 2®PORTEX) four times a day. Patients were instructed to perform the same training at home after discharge. Using this device, we measured pre- and postoperative inspired volumes in each group. Data were analyzed with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and a paired Student t-test. A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning both operative age and the degree of the deformity calculated by Haller index. Preoperative inspiratory volume showed no significant differences. Although there were no statistical differences between two groups in the inspiratory volume at discharge, these two parameters were significantly higher in group A after three months postoperatively (A: 1404 ±â€¯466 ml vs B: 900 ±â€¯314 ml) and the values increased compared to the preoperative stage in group A. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate the aggressive respiratory rehabilitation is an effective regimen to increase inspiratory volume at an early stage after Nuss procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

[Minimally invasive ascending aortic replacement in patient with chronic aortic dissection type A (in Russian only)]. / Protezirovanie voskhodiashchei aorty iz mini-dostupa u patsienta s khronicheskoi dissektsiei aorty tipa A.

It is presented case report of minimally invasive surgical repair of chronic aortic dissection type A in a 61-year-old patient. Perspective minimally invasive surgical approach is suggested for this pathology in order to improve quality of life and rehabilitation after cardiac surgery. Surgical technique and features are comprehensively described.

Insights in work rehabilitation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about work rehabilitation after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. The goal of this study was to further objectify the postoperative work rehabilitation. Not only duration of sick leave, but also the extent of return to work will be assessed. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study was conveyed between January 2009 and April 2014. Eighty-six preoperatively employed patients were included. Data regarding patients' preoperative occupation, actual job status, and postoperative duration until return to work were retrieved. Potential prognostic factors for work rehabilitation were analyzed. Complaints that could impede rehabilitation were questioned (based on EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18). Work activity, defined as either partially or fully resumed professional activity as compared to the preoperative status, was measured at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, 40.2% of patients reached partial and 14.6% had full professional recovery and after 12 months 28.2% and 40.8%, respectively. After 18 months, a stagnation was seen (19.0% partial; 43.1% full recovery). Median follow-up was 18 months (IQR 12-18). Self-employment was a significant predictor for full professional recovery (p = 0.005, OR 2.45 95% CI 1.32-4.56). The median time to full professional recovery was shorter for this group. The most common complaint among all patients was fatigue. This complaint did not significantly differ between working (fully and partially) and non-working groups (p = 0.727). CONCLUSIONS: Only approximately 40% of patients reached full professional recovery 1 year after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. Barely any progression toward return to work was seen after 1 year postoperatively. Roughly 30% of patients never returned to work. Self-employed workers had a higher percentage of restoration to full professional activity, as well as shorter duration to return. These findings highlight the importance of adequate counseling of patients in order to prepare them for the impact of this procedure on professional activities.

Enhanced recovery program for minimally invasive and vaginal urogynecologic surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) are evidenced-based interventions designed to standardize perioperative care and expedite recovery to baseline functional status after surgery. There remains a paucity of data addressing the effect of ERPs on pelvic reconstructive surgery patients. METHODS: An ERP was implemented at our institution including: patient counseling, carbohydrate loading, avoidance of opioids, goal-directed fluid resuscitation, immediate postoperative feeding and early ambulation. Patients undergoing elective pelvic reconstructive surgery before and after implementation of the ERP were identified in this cohort study. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery within the ERP compared with 76 historic controls. Reductions were seen in length of hospital stay (29.9 vs. 27.9 h, p = 0.04), total morphine equivalents (37.4 vs. 19.4 mg, p < 0.01) and total intravenous fluids administered (2.7 l vs. 1.5 l, p < 0.0001). Hospital discharges before noon doubled (32.9 vs. 60.2%, p < 0.01). More patients in the ERP group ambulated on the day of surgery (17.1 vs. 73.7%, p < 0.01) and ambulated at least two times the day following surgery (34.2 vs. 72.9%, p < 0.01). No differences were seen in average pain scores (highest pain score 7.39 vs. 7.37, p = 0.95), hospital readmissions (3.9 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.84), or postoperative complications (6.58 vs. 8.47%, p = 0.79). Patient satisfaction significantly improved. ERP was not associated with an increase in 30-day total hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of ERP for pelvic reconstructive surgery patients was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay, improved patient satisfaction, and decreased administration of intravenous fluids and opioids without an increase in complications, readmissions, or hospital costs.

Early gain in pain reduction and hip function, but more complications following the direct anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial of 100 patients with 5 years of follow up.

Background and purpose - The minimally invasive direct anterior (DA) approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is supposed to reduce surgical tissue trauma. We hypothesized that patients operated with the DA technique would have less postoperative pain and better hip function compared with a group operated with a conventional direct lateral (DL) approach. Patients and methods - 100 patients with hip osteoarthritis scheduled for THA were equally randomized to surgery through either DA or DL. Pain was assessed on a VAS scale, hip function with TUG, 10mWT, HHS, and quality of life with EQ-5D. Patients were followed up after the first 3 days, 8 weeks, and at 1 and 5 years postoperatively. Results - The DA group registered less pain with activity on the second day (VAS 42 vs. 55), performed TUG 6 seconds faster on the third day and had 8 points higher HHS and higher EQ-5D index (0.86 vs 0.78) at 8 weeks; all differences were statistically significant. No clinically relevant differences between groups in pain, hip function, or quality of life were seen at 1 or 5 years. 7 surgical approach related complications appeared in the DA group, none in the DL. Interpretation - The results indicate that the presumably less traumatic approach results in reduced immediate postoperative pain and better hip function and higher quality of life in the early postoperative period. However, this positive effect is not seen at later time points. Instead, complications appear to be over-represented, thus questioning the use of the method.

FA01.03: USE OF 'NON-TUBE NO FASTING' ERAS PROTOCOL IN PATIENTS AFTER MIE WITH LI'S ANASTOMOSIS: OUTCOMES IN THE FIRST 113 PATIENTS PERFORMED BY A SURGEON AFTER TRAINING COURSE.

BACKGROUND: Use of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) protocol in the patients after esophagectomy is reported to be feasible and safe in recent studies. And in Prof. Yin Li's research, patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE) with Li's anastomosis took oral feeding on the 1st day after operation (POD1). However, all the esophagectomy-procedures were proceeded by experienced experts. There was no report regarding whether ERAS protocol after MIE with Li's anastomosis could be safely proceeded by a young surgeon after training course. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of 'Non-Tube No Fasting' ERAS Protocol in patients after MIE with Li's Anastomosis proceeded by a surgeon after the training course. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent MIE for cancer from December 2015 to September 2017 by a new surgical team finished MIE training course in our department. During the study period, the new team performed Mckeown MIE with Li's anastomosis for 127 esophageal cancer patients. We analyzed the data of 113 patients who followed the protocol of 'Non-tube No Fasting' ERAS. The primary end-points were the incidence of anastomotic fistula, the injury of recurrent laryngeal nerve, pneumonia, and postoperative length of hospital-stay. RESULTS: All the 113 patients began oral feeding on POD1. Two patients exited the ERAS protocol on account of bucking caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve injury on POD3. The incidence of anastomotic fistula, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and pneumonia were 3.5% (4/113), 12.4%(14/113) and 18.5%(21/113). The average length of postoperative hospital-stay was 8.6 ± 6.9 days. Both of the in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality were 0. CONCLUSION: Our date indicated that it was feasible and safe for a selected surgeon after 'Non-tube no fasting' ERAS and MIE training courses to proceed the protocol. Of course, more clinical researches are needed to confirm this result. DISCLOSURE: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Good results with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee resurfacing after 10-year follow-up.

The current study was designed to determine (1) 10-year implant survival and (2) patient's self-reported functional outcome in a single surgeon's consecutive cohort of patients who had undergone minimally invasive unicondylar resurfacing with a modified cementation technique utilizing a cobalt-chromium femur/inlaid all-PE tibia, fixed-bearing unicompartmental prosthesis. We included 344 consecutive patients (361 knees) who had received the study device between January 2002 and December 2005 in this retrospective study. After 10 years, 78 patients (78 knees) had died, 59 (59 knees) were lost to follow-up and four (four knees) did not participate. Thirteen knees (11 patients) were revised after a mean of 5.8 ± 1.9 years. Hence, the study population at follow-up comprised 192 patients (207 knees). Ten-year implant survival was 94.6% (95% confidence interval, 90.9-96.8%). The Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score were 68.9 ± 28.9 and 39 ± 9.1, respectively. Excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes were obtained with UKA with an inlaid all-PE tibia with a modified cementation technique.

Comparison of supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach total hip versus conventional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been one of the most successful orthopedic procedures over the past 30 years. Nowadays, the techniques of exposure for THA have undergone great changes, allowing surgeons to perform THA through mini-incisions. Recently, a novel minimally invasive surgical technique of the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty was reported in 2011. The purpose of this study was to compare the SuperPath approach with the conventional posterior approach, in terms early outcomes and radiologic results. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive unilateral primary hip osteoarthritis adult patients were randomly divided into two groups. Forty-six patients (SuperPath group) were operated on using the SuperPath approach, and 46 patients (conventional group) were operated on with the conventional posterior approach. Outcomes were evaluated using preoperative index, intraoperative data, and postoperative function data. The positioning of the implants was analyzed by radiography. RESULTS: No significant difference was detected in skin-to-skin operation time, blood loss, transfusion rate, postoperative complications, abduction angle, anteversion angle, and stem alignments. The incision length and length of stay (LOS) in the SuperPath group were significantly lower. The VAS score in the SuperPath group at the 1-week, 1-month and 3-month postoperative intervals were lower than those VAS scores in the conventional group. The Harris Hip Score and Barthel Index (BI) for Activities of Daily Living in the SuperPath group were significantly higher at the 1- and 3-month follow-up intervals and were not significantly different 1 year after operation. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomized study reveals that the SuperPath technique was associated with shorter LOS, earlier time to walk and climb, and lower postoperative pain levels. It also allowed early postoperative rehabilitation and faster recovery than conventional technique.

[Intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal clavicle fractures using minimally invasive percutaneous reduction]. / Die intramedulläre Nagelung der diaphysären Klavikulafraktur in minimal-invasiver Repositionstechnik.

OBJECTIVE: Closed reduction and intramedullary nailing is common in diaphyseal clavicle fractures. The aim of this report is to demonstrate a surgical method with minimally invasive percutaneous reduction in cases where closed reduction fails. The procedure is associated with good cosmetic results. INDICATIONS: Percutaneous reduction using two reduction forceps enables intramedullary nailing without an open procedure. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Open, multifragmented or non-dislocated fractures, oblique fractures due to postoperative dislocation or shortening risk, fracture having potential to become compound fractures, neurovascular complications, pseudoarthroses. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The patient is in beach-chair position. After an incision, the nail is entered from medial, two reduction forceps are mounted percutaneously at the lateral and medial fragment. After reduction the nail is pushed forward into the lateral fragment. Thereby, the fracture hematoma is not disturbed for the most part. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early functional rehabilitation with maximal abduction and anteversion of 90° for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Anatomic reduction can be achieved with mild cosmetic impairment.

A long-term (20 years') follow-up after arthroscopically assisted repair of the TFCC.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess long-term functional outcome for patients after arthroscopic assisted suture for peripheral tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). METHODS: Eleven patients, 26 (15-59) years old at time of surgery, 48 (35-78) years old at time of follow-up, were available for this 20-year follow-up. Subjective and objective outcomes, such as range of motion, grip strength, patients' satisfaction, pain, and Mayo Modified Wrist Score, were assessed, as well as asking the question if the patients would have had the surgery done again, knowing the outcome, based on a clinical examination and patient reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Median Mayo Wrist score was 85 (30-100) and, according to the Modified Mayo Wrist Score, seven patients presented good or excellent results. The patients reported median low 25 (0-66) on pain and median high 90 (1-100) on satisfaction. Ten patients presented with intact stability of the distal radioulnar joint at follow-up. Compared to the level of pain prior to surgery, two patients reported to be free of pain, five patients experienced major pain relief, two patients reported minor pain relief, while two patients reported no difference. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study support the trend of persisting good results for the majority of patients having undergone arthroscopically assisted repair with an outside-in suture technique for peripheral tears of the TFCC.

The Effectiveness of Open Repair Versus Percutaneous Repair for an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture.

Clinical Scenario: There are 2 approaches available for surgical repair of the Achilles tendon: open or percutaneous. However, there is controversy over which repair is superior. Focused Clinical Question: Which type of surgery is better in providing the best overall patient outcome, open or percutaneous repair, in physically active men and women with acute Achilles tendon ruptures? Summary of Search, "Best Evidence" Appraised, and Key Findings: The literature was searched for studies of level 3 evidence or higher that investigated the effectiveness of open repair versus percutaneous repair on acute Achilles tendon ruptures in physically active men and women. The literature search resulted in 3 studies for possible inclusion. All 3 good-quality studies were included. Clinical Bottom Line: There is supporting evidence to indicate that percutaneous repair is the best option for Achilles tendon surgery when it comes to the physically active population. Percutaneous repair has faster surgery times, less risk of complications, and faster recovery times over having an open repair, although it is acknowledged that every patient has a different situation and best individual option may vary patient to patient.

[Strategy and prospective of enhanced recovery after surgery for esophageal cancer].

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition and psychology. It aims to minimize surgical stress and maintain physiological function in perioperative care, thereby expediting recovery. ERAS theory has been clinically applied for nearly 20 years and it is firstly used in colorectal surgery, then widely used in other surgical fields. However, ERAS is not used commonly in esophagectomy because of its surgical complexity and high morbidity of postoperative complications, which limits the application of ERAS in the field of esophagectomy. In recent years, with the increasing maturation of minimally invasive esophagectomy, attention to tissue and organ protection concept, improvement of making gastric tube, breakthrough of anastomosis technique, and the presentation and application of new concepts, ERAS has made great progress in the field of esophagectomy. This article summarizes some ERAS measures in the treatment of esophageal cancer based on evidence-based medicine, and performs an effective ERAS mode for clinical application of esophagectomy. During preoperative preparation and evaluation, we propose preoperative education and nutrition evaluation without regular intestinal preparation, and advocate preemptive analgesia without preanesthetic medication. During intra-operative management, anesthesia scheme should be optimized, fluid transfusion should be controlled properly, suitable operation mode should be chosen, and intraoperative hypothermia should be avoided. During postoperative management, sufficient analgesia should be administered with non-opioid analgesics, drainage tube placement must be decreased and removed earlier, urinary catheter and gastrointestinal decompression tube should be removed earlier, and oral intake and ambulation should be resumed as early as possible. "Received surgery yesterday, oral intake today, discharged home 5-7 days", ERAS program based on "non tube no fasting" has been applied in some medical centers and becomes more and more maturation. In the future, we will rely on the increasing improvement and systemic training of ERAS mode in order to promote such application in more medical centers. With the multi-center clinical trials, based on constant enrichments and improvements, a general expert consensus will be made finally.

Factors for Assessing the Effectiveness of Early Rehabilitation after Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The effectiveness of current rehabilitation programs is supported by high-level evidence from the results of randomized controlled trials, but an increasing number of patients are not discharged from the hospital because of the schedule of the critical path (CP). The present study aimed to determine which factors can be used to assess the effectiveness of early rehabilitation. We enrolled 123 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) who had undergone unilateral minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for the first time. The following factors were assessed preoperatively: the maximum isometric muscle strength of the knee extensors and flexors, maximum knee and hip joint angle, pain, 5-m maximum walking speed, sex, age, body mass index, exercise habits, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, femorotibial angle, failure side (bilateral or unilateral knee OA), and functional independence measure. We re-evaluated physical function (i.e., muscle strength, joint angle, and pain) and motor function (5-m maximum walking speed) 14 days postoperatively. Changes in physical function, motor function (5-m maximum walking speed), and number of days to independent walking were used as explanatory variables. The postoperative duration of hospitalization (in days) was used as the dependent variable in multivariate analyses. These analyses were adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, exercise habits, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, femorotibial angle, failure side, and functional independence measure. The duration of hospitalization was significantly affected by the number of days to independent walking (p < 0.001, ß = 0.507) and a change in the 5-m maximum walking speed (p = 0.016, ß = -0.262). Multiple regression analysis showed that the radiographic knee grade (p = 0.029, ß = 0.239) was a significant confounding factor. Independent walking and walking speed recovery were considered to reduce the duration of hospitalization. Therefore, these indices can be used to assess the effectiveness of early rehabilitation.